37
http://w w w .sbg.ac.a t/erz/m ss

Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

http://www.sbg.ac.at/erz/mss

Page 2: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects

© 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon

• Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements - Scales – Questionnaire)

• Self-Evaluation (Motivation, STP (Students/Teachers/Parents) Consensus)

• School Development (Individuality/Schoolspecificity)

• Multiperspectivity (Students, Teachers, Parents – School Partnership)• Anonymity (Individual Persons, Single Schools)• Full Data Collection (Everybody gets the Oportunity to Contribute)• Analysis of Discrepances (Is[fact]-Ought[ideal]-Comparison, Strengths-

Weaknesses-Profile)• Aims (Definitions and Evaluation of Achievement (Interventions))• Quantitative & Qualitative Aspects (‚Empirical‘ Facts)• Cross Section Analysis (Flashlight Perspective)• Longitudinal Analysis (Measurement of Changes)• Comparison between Schools (System Level)• Expert Knowledge (University – School - Family)

Page 3: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

MODUL POOL

– Overlaping Moduls: Students-Teachers-Parents

– Single Items up to Inventories and Complete Scales

– Specific Modules

• Level Specific Moduls (5. & 12/13. Grade)

• Students (for instance: Class Climate, …)

• Theachers (for instance: Curriculum, Advanced Training, …)

• Parents (for instance: Parents Organisation, P-P-Contact, …)

• Headmaster (for instance: Leadership, …)

• Graduates (School Leavers) (Retrospective Evaluation)

– Development of School Specific Items (Moduls)

Page 4: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Group of persons

Module topictheory

Instrument for data collection

Dimensios of the MSS-Analysis-Cube

Page 5: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Students

Headmasters

Internat. Comparisons of Achievements

Aggres-sions

Feedback Leader-ship

Goals of Education

Interview

Questionnaire

Test

Discussion

Observation

.

.

.

. . .

Former Students

Parents

MSS-Module Cube

Teachers

Page 6: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Internat..Comp. of Achieve-ments

TeachersParents

Informa-tion Flow

Head Master

Visions

Feedback on Teaching

Questionnaire

Parents

Goals of Education

Questionnaire

1

2

3

5

47

6

Teachers

Teachers

Students

Questionnaire

Test

Interview

Interview

Discussion

Goals of Education

Goals of Education

Selection of Module Cubes

Page 7: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

1.

First Contact

2.Module Selection/Pool 3.

QuestionnaireStudent, Teachers, Parents, Head Master, ...

4.

Data Collection

5.

Statistical Analysis &

Interpretation

6.

Results(Presentation) 7.

Discussion

8.

InterventionImplementation

9.

Measurement of Changes

© 2000

Page 8: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Desiderata of Research (Bunge 1967)

• SCIENCE• true• new• deep/comprehensive• rich (many

parameters)• bold• precise

• TECHNOLOGY• reliable• useful• efficient• secure• confirmed• utility-cost-relation• cost reducing

Page 9: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

STP-Selection of Modules Students Teachers Parents Summs S1 S2 S3 S4 S L E S L E S L E

1 Social.statical Information 2 Working place (school as …) 1 1 2 4 1 3 2 1 2 7 6 4 Class Room 2 2 7 3 2 3 14 2 3 6 Gym 5 6 7 4 22 0 0

18 Computer Room 4 5 6 5 1 1 1 20 1 2 20 Sponsoring 2 2 3 4 1 4 2 1 11 1 7 21 School journal 3 3 4 2 2 3 1 12 2 4 25 „Smoker corner“ 3 3 8 6 2 1 20 0 3 27 School order 1 2 1 1 4 2 2 1 1 5 8 2 28 Transparency of decisions 2 5 4 1 1 5 0 11 7 29 Self-Efficacy 3 4 5 5 2 2 2 3 2 3 17 6 8 30 School events 1 5 4 3 1 2 3 1 3 13 6 4 32 Teaching Materials (Books, PCs, …) 1 1 1 4 1 3 2 1 8 34 Time table 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 8 3 5 36 School Democracy 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 6 2 45 Equality & Discrimination 1 2 3 1 3 4 2 3 6 4 9 46 Class Mates/Class Climate 4 5 5 5 7 4 1 6 1 2 19 12 9 47 Motivation 6 3 5 7 9 7 6 1 3 14 23 10 54 Parental involvment in school 1 1 2 5 4 2 7 4 59 Teacher-Teacher-Interaction 2 1 3 2 5 2 2 4 9 61 Climate in school 1 1 3 4 9 4 2 4 5 17 6 62 Class teacher 1 4 3 3 1 1 1 10 2 65 Headmaster 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 6 6 1 67 Students-Teachers-Interaction 1 2 3 1 1 4 2 1 3 5 7 70 Teachers-Parentes-Interaction 3 4 2 3 0 7 5 75 New Subjects 6 4 5 3 1 0 2 18 3 0 78 Disciplin 1 1 6 7 7 1 2 20 1 80 Quality of Instruction 1 2 2 4 2 4 4 3 3 8 11 91 Difficulties in the new school (1.year) 4 1 2 1 1 0 7 2

101 Aggression 3 3 4 7 4 3 5 3 4 10 14 12 102 Fear/Anxiety 1 1 1 1 7 4 4 5 1 3 4 15 9 103 Home Work – general (F) 2 1 1 2 4 2 2 2 2 6 8 4 105 Evaluation of Achievement – general (F) 4 13 4 1 3 1 1 21 1 5 107 Contentment - Eder (F) 1 2 3 4 3 1 1 3 10 2 111 Ressources 1 1 2 3 1 2 6 0 114 Strengths and Weaknesses of this School 3 1 4 6 4 2 3 4 4 14 9

123 Feed-Back for Teachers (all students to all teachers on all subjects) 2 3 3 2 3 1 1 2 10 3 4

Etc.

Page 10: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Instrument Development: Constructing a School Specific Questionnaire

Preparatory work at the University– Overview of available modules– Collecting questions/catchwords– Protocols about the results of Students/Teachers/Parents-

meetings

Maximum version including all selected modules Reducing the modules at the university (suggestion) Extention to the school (commentaries/reductions) Revision according to the wishes of the „school“ Involvment of the school`s „development group“ „Ping-Pong-game“ until the final „optimum“ is reached Final decision concerning the optimal MSS-version Print of the questionnaire (usually: Students/Teachers/Parents

each 4 pages) Data collection at the school

Page 11: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

MSS-Data Feedback

2. Time in School: Result Presentation

• Verbal Presentation in all three groups (STP) • Diagrams on CD-Rom• Final Report written feed back • „Open“ Answers lists (in the appendix)• Basic Data Report answers to all

questions• Detailed-Comparisons tabels (in appendix)

Page 12: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

MSS MSS-No.: Firstname of Mother

Type: S-GR12 Your Date of Birth

Schoolcode: 8 0 7 Firstname of Father S Class (z.B. 5a, 7b):

Für die Auswertung wird für jede Person eine eigene stabile Buchstabenkombination benötigt, um Ver-änderungen messen zu können. Bitte jeweils die 3 ersten Buchstaben angeben – wir geben diese Info an niemanden weiter! Bitte Deinen Code ausfüllen: Your Year of Birth 1 9

How do you evaluate the following statements? Y our oppinion is important! Please express the degree of consent or rejectiont by checking off!

stimmt genau

stimmt nicht

Coding Help

If I have learning problems I get help from my class mates. O O O O O S046_001

The Relation among the class mates in our class is very good. O O O O O S046_002

Sometimes I am affraid that class mates might laugh at me. O O O O O S046_015

Often I feel like an outsider in my classes. O O O O O S046_020

I have to cheat in order to be able to pass the tests and examinations. O O O O O S105_006

The achievement standards in our school are very high in most subjects. O O O O O S105_011

There are many conflicts in our classes. O O O O O S101_112

Our headmaster is competent. O O O O O S065_050

Most terachers treat the students respectful. O O O O O S067_101

Remarks on „new school rules“: S027_901

Remarks on „confidential teacher“ S130_901

Example I: MSS – Data Feedback

Page 13: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

MSS MSS-Databasis: n=687 CHRISTIAN-DOPPLER-GYMNASIUM SALZBURG

Typ: SGR12

Schoolcode: 8 0 7 S Date of Collection: 2001/4

687 student questionnaires (of 746) were filled in; i.e. 92%. Distribution among the classes: 1.cl (119), 2.cl (134), 3.cl (121), 4.cl (92), 5.cl (55), 6.cl (61), 7. cl (52), 8.cl (53). Note: Valid-percents are given for each statement and category. The numbers highlighted grey are the modal values. In the right row the mean values are presented.

How do you evaluate the following statements? Y our oppinion is important! Please express the degree of consent or rejectiont by checking off!

I agree I disagree

If I have learning problems I get help from my class mates. 33 29 22 10 7 2,29

The „fellow feeling“ inour class is very good. 21 35 29 8 7 2,45

Sometimes I am affraid that class mates might laugh at me. 8 10 14 18 51 3,93

I often feel like an outsider in my classes. 3 6 9 17 65 4,35

I have to cheat often in order to be able to pass the tests and examinations. 4 4 6 17 68 4,42

The (achievement) standards in our school are very high in most subjects. 15 14 29 25 17 3,16

There are many conflicts in our classes. 12 17 22 30 19 3,27

Our headmaster is competent. 11 10 23 20 35 3,58

Most terachers treat the students respectful. 39 34 17 7 3 2,03

Remarks on „new school rules“: 38% for the answers see appendix S027_901

Remarks on „confidential teacher”: 44% for the answers see S130_901

mean valuesmean values

modal valuesmodal values

general informationgeneral information

amount of answers to open questions

amount of answers to open questions in percent in percent

valid valid percentagespercentages

Example II: MSS-Online – Data Feedback (Final Data Report)

Page 14: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

45

000

55

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

stimmt genau stimmt eher weder noch stimmt eher nicht stimmt nicht

SchülerInnen

10

3040

25

50

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

stimmt genau stimmt eher weder noch stimmt eher nicht stimmt nicht

SchülerInnen

1550

20

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

stimmt genau stimmt eher weder noch stimmt eher nicht stimmt nicht

SchülerInnen

1520

20

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

stimmt genau stimmt eher weder noch stimmt eher nicht stimmt nicht

stimmt genaustimmt eherweder nochstimmt eher nichtstimmt nicht

Example III: MSS – Data Feedback (Graphics)

Page 15: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

School 851

My

Class

Percentage (%) of approval Minimum Average Maximum %

STUDENTS: I am content with my class teacher. 35 75 100 82

STUDENTS: I have confidence in my class teacher. 19 72 100 65

STUDENTS: Unser Klassenvorstand setzt sich für uns ein. 48 75 100 88

PARENTS: My child s̀ class teacher often gives informations too late to the students.. 0 8 16 10

PARENTS: I am content with my child s̀ class teacher. 54 88 100 95

Example for Class-Teacher Feedback

Page 16: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

TEACHER X… 2b 4a 4b 6a 7a 8b mean Comp. 2a 5a 7c mean Comp.

...can explain very well 57% 74% 46% 91% 67% 58% 66% 80% 29% 76% 57% 54% 40%

...puts me under pressure 20% 7% 23% 14% 11% 14% 15% 25% 0% 0% 3% 1% 30%

...teaches lively 58% 56% 32% 59% 57% 58% 53% 40% 13% 61% 67% 47% 40%

...offers projects for applying the subject matters 57% 59% 50% 55% 63% 42% 54% 70% 29% 66% 63% 53% 27%

...is unfair 5% 4% 32% 0% 27% 17% 14% 43% 17% 4% 7% 9% 80%

...gives stiff exams 15% 30% 50% 9% 7% 26% 23% 80% 13% 4% 33% 16% 42%

...is well prepared most of the time 60% 59% 42% 50% 47% 29% 48% 40% 13% 57% 50% 40% 50%

...is very competent in his subject 40% 56% 50% 50% 60% 48% 51% 30% 9% 39% 83% 44% 25%

...thinks his subject is the most important 11% 8% 32% 23% 27% 26% 21% 40% 27% 0% 3% 10% 24%

…can motivate me to do additinal work in this domain 0% 0% 23% 5% 10% 30% 11% 20% 9% 0% 4% 4% 10%

...is fair 39% 42% 17% 41% 37% 20% 33% 50% 18% 41% 55% 38% 70%

...has problems to teach his subject matters 11% 4% 4% 9% 10% 29% 11% 40% 18% 0% 45% 21% 20%

...interests me by his teaching 42% 50% 32% 45% 40% 35% 41% 25% 9% 57% 28% 31% 30%

...is boring 16% 23% 12% 9% 30% 26% 19% 25% 0% 18% 17% 12% 26%

teacher`s name

teacher`s name

evaluation statements

evaluation statements

classes

classes

mean about all c

lasses

mean about all c

lasses

mean about all t

eachers

mean about all t

eachers

subject I

subject I

susubject II

bject II

Example IV: MSS – Data Feedback (Teacher Individual Feedback)

Page 17: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Information

7981

62

2 519

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

always/often

good inormed

never/rarely

good informed

Students Parents Teachers

Page 18: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

New Subjects

78

55

79 8176

71

84

65

98

83

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Civic Education

Experimenting (Science)Italian

FrenchMultimedia

Parents Students

Page 19: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Strenghths of this School ...

... parents:

• Low number of students per class (39)

• Subjects that can be choosen freely (13)

• Cooperation (T,P,S) (6)

• etc.

... teachers:

• Low number of students per class (13)

• Teachers (5)

• Equipment (3)

• Rural surrounding (3)

Page 20: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Aims of Education (Students)

Please rate… IS In our school it is a fact

that...

OUGHT In our scholl it schould be so

that ...

Percentage (valid%) Stimmt genau

stimmt nicht

Ø

stimmt genau

stimmt nicht

Ø

1 scial cometences are trained. 18 25 36 12 9 2,71 57 26 13 2 1 1,64

2 creative potentials are cultivated. 16 30 35 11 7 2,64 57 27 12 2 1 1,63

3 the will for achievement is promoted. 26 33 25 10 6 2,36 59 27 10 2 1 1,58

4 ethical attitudes can be acquired. 19 27 35 13 7 2,62 50 25 19 2 4 1,84

5 logical thinking is promoted. 31 32 27 7 4 2,21 64 24 10 1 1 1,50

6 human condact is practized. 17 31 33 12 7 2,62 65 22 10 2 1 1,53

7 factual knowledge is taught. 44 33 19 3 1 1,83 68 24 8 0 0 1,42

8 technical understanding is promoted. 14 18 29 22 17 3,09 40 23 20 9 7 2,19

9 democratical attitudes in school life are promoted. 21 27 28 13 10 2,65 56 25 14 2 2 1,70

10 scientific experimenting is encouraged. 16 28 33 14 9 2,72 42 29 19 5 5 2,01

11 joy of bodily activities can be experienced. 22 28 25 16 10 2,63 61 23 11 3 3 1,65

12 Insights into political connectionsis promoted. 8 18 26 25 22 3,36 35 25 19 9 13 2,40

13 an exhaustive general education is given. 32 32 25 7 3 2,16 65 22 10 2 1 1,50

14 gelehrt wird, Zusammenhänge zu erfassen. 30 37 23 7 3 2,16 61 26 9 2 2 1,59

15 team work is exercised. 35 31 21 9 4 2,15 69 22 7 1 1 1,44

16 traditionall gender role stereotyps are critically reflected. 34 27 25 9 6 2,24 60 18 14 2 6 1,76

17 peace education takes place. 23 34 29 9 4 2,38 56 27 14 2 0 1,63

18 It is taught how to learn. 27 22 23 15 14 2,68 67 22 7 2 2 1,49

19 ein Bewußtsein staatsbürgerlicher Rechte & Pflichten geweckt wird. 13 20 32 18 17 3,05 38 30 22 6 4 2,08

20 interdisciplinary connections are made explicit. 18 32 29 14 7 2,62 47 33 16 3 2 1,81

21 assertivity is trained. 21 25 29 14 11 2,68 63 22 11 2 1 1,56

22 sensitivity towards nature is promoted. 28 22 24 14 11 2,57 53 24 15 5 4 1,84

23 the importance of the mass media is made explicit. 24 27 24 15 11 2,61 47 27 17 5 4 1,92

24 students are motivated to act in civil disobidience if necessary. 20 25 30 14 11 2,69 49 30 15 3 2 1,78

25 religious attitudes are promoted. 23 20 25 16 16 2,80 23 18 21 15 23 2,96

26 self-disciplin is trained. 23 32 30 10 4 2,41 31 28 26 9 6 2,33

27 competences on compouters are taught. 22 19 23 17 19 2,90 68 19 9 3 2 1,53

28 enjoyment of great art is stirred/deepend. 28 26 27 12 7 2,45 46 29 14 6 5 1,94

29 the abilities to work at a university are taught. 22 28 29 11 10 2,60 60 22 14 2 2 1,64

Please rank those three educational aims which are most important for you! (Simply fill in the number of the educational aim!)

IS (already realzed)

OUGHT (to be realized)

A 1: Nr.: 7 (30,6%) Nr.: 27 (28,2%)

B 2: Nr.: 13 (19,9%) Nr.: 13 (21,7%)

C 3: Nr.: 5 (17,7%) Nr.: 29/7 (19,1%)

Page 21: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

AIMS OF EDUCATION10-14yrs 15-18yrs Teachers Parents 10-14yrs 15-18.yrsTeachers ParentsMittelw ert Rang Mittelw ert Rang Mittelw ert Rang Mittelw ert Rang Mittelw ert Rang Mittelw ert Rang Mittelw ert Rang Mittelw ert Rang

1 scial cometences are trained. 2,58 23 2,95 17 2,26 6 2,60 12 1,64 16 1,63 11 1,40 4 1,49 9

2 creative potentials are cultivated. 2,48 17 2,93 16 2,59 13 2,66 18 1,61 13 1,66 12 1,55 9 1,52 10

3 the will for achievement is promoted. 2,38 12 2,31 3 2,39 8 2,23 4 1,50 6 1,71 13 1,54 7 1,64 17

4 ethical attitudes can be acquired. 2,48 18 2,88 15 2,78 19 2,68 19 1,76 18 1,97 22 1,76 19 1,69 20

5 logical thinking is promoted. 2,12 5 2,38 4 2,17 4 2,33 7 1,49 5 1,53 8 1,61 12 1,42 6

6 human condact is practized. 2,49 19 2,85 14 2,22 5 2,50 10 1,54 9 1,50 5 1,34 2 1,31 2

7 factual knowledge is taught. 1,91 1 1,69 1 1,83 1 1,57 1 1,44 2 1,38 2 1,70 16 1,44 8

8 technical understanding is promoted. 2,92 28 3,41 25 3,36 29 2,97 26 2,01 26 2,49 27 2,67 28 2,26 28

9 democratical attitudes in school life are promoted. 2,57 21 2,78 12 2,41 11 2,48 9 1,60 12 1,86 17 1,54 8 1,58 15

10 scientific experimenting is encouraged. 2,58 24 2,98 19 2,93 24 2,76 22 1,89 22 2,20 25 2,00 24 1,95 23

11 joy of bodily activities can be experienced. 2,40 13 3,06 21 2,39 9 2,61 14 1,50 7 1,89 19 1,78 20 1,65 18

12 Insights into political connectionsis promoted. 3,24 29 3,58 29 2,91 22 3,13 29 2,53 28 2,17 23 1,75 18 2,03 25

13 an exhaustive general education is given. 2,19 8 2,11 2 2,15 3 1,84 3 1,59 11 1,35 1 1,38 3 1,28 1

14 gelehrt wird, Zusammenhänge zu erfassen. 1,98 2 2,48 8 2,36 7 2,28 6 1,63 15 1,52 7 1,22 1 1,37 4

15 team work is exercised. 2,02 3 2,38 5 2,65 16 2,26 5 1,42 1 1,47 4 1,57 11 1,42 5

16traditionall gender role stereotyps are criticallyreflected. 2,13 6 2,47 7 2,73 17 2,73 20 1,67 17 1,91 21 1,80 22 2,06 26

17 peace education takes place. 2,19 7 2,72 11 2,54 12 2,47 8 1,55 10 1,76 14 1,68 15 1,58 14

18 It is taught how to learn. 2,36 11 3,27 23 2,91 23 2,98 27 1,47 3 1,51 6 1,49 6 1,34 3

19ein Bewußtsein staatsbürgerlicher Rechte & Pflichtengeweckt wird. 2,82 27 3,47 27 3,07 26 3,08 28 1,96 23 2,27 26 1,87 23 2,02 24

20 interdisciplinary connections are made explicit. 2,44 14 2,96 18 2,76 18 2,66 17 1,76 20 1,87 18 1,43 5 1,59 16

21 assertivity is trained. 2,45 15 3,10 22 2,80 21 2,74 21 1,52 8 1,63 10 2,00 25 1,65 19

22 sensitivity towards nature is promoted. 2,09 4 3,48 28 2,80 20 2,53 11 1,62 14 2,19 24 1,64 14 1,53 11

23 the importance of the mass media is made explicit. 2,57 22 2,69 10 2,62 15 2,64 16 1,97 25 1,84 16 1,74 17 1,72 21

24students are motivated to act in civil disobidience ifnecessary. 2,52 20 3,01 20 3,04 25 2,82 24 1,77 21 1,80 15 1,63 13 1,57 13

25 religious attitudes are promoted. 2,46 16 3,45 26 3,07 28 2,96 25 2,72 29 3,36 29 2,70 29 2,50 29

26 self-disciplin is trained. 2,27 9 2,66 9 3,07 27 2,60 13 2,07 27 2,74 28 2,28 27 2,06 27

27 competences on compouters are taught. 2,70 26 3,29 24 2,39 10 2,79 23 1,47 4 1,62 9 2,19 26 1,54 12

28 enjoyment of great art is stirred/deepend. 2,27 10 2,79 13 2,60 14 2,63 15 1,97 24 1,90 20 1,78 21 1,82 22

29 the abilities to work at a university are taught. 2,69 25 2,44 6 1,98 2 1,82 2 1,76 19 1,44 3 1,55 10 1,43 7

OUGHTIS

Page 22: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

AIMS OF EDUCATION10-14yrs 15-18yrs TeachersParents

Diff. rank Diff. rank Diff. rank Diff. rank

1 scial cometences are trained. -0,94 4 -1,32 6 -0,85 17 -1,10 6

2 creative potentials are cultivated. -0,87 11 -1,27 8 -1,03 9 -1,14 5

3 the will for achievement is promoted. -0,89 10 -0,60 25 -0,85 18 -0,60 24

4 ethical attitudes can be acquired. -0,72 14 -0,90 19 -1,02 10 -0,99 12

5 logical thinking is promoted. -0,63 18 -0,85 21 -0,57 25 -0,91 15

6 human condact is practized. -0,95 3 -1,35 5 -0,88 14 -1,19 4

7 factual knowledge is taught. -0,47 23 -0,31 27 -0,13 29 -0,13 29

8 technical understanding is promoted. -0,91 7 -0,92 17 -0,70 23 -0,71 22

9 democratical attitudes in school life are promoted. -0,97 2 -0,93 16 -0,87 15 -0,89 18

10 scientific experimenting is encouraged. -0,69 16 -0,78 23 -0,93 11 -0,81 20

11 joy of bodily activities can be experienced. -0,90 8 -1,17 11 -0,61 24 -0,96 13

12 Insights into political connectionsis promoted. -0,70 15 -1,41 4 -1,16 5 -1,10 7

13 an exhaustive general education is given. -0,60 21 -0,76 24 -0,77 22 -0,56 25

14 gelehrt wird, Zusammenhänge zu erfassen. -0,35 26 -0,96 15 -1,14 7 -0,91 16

15 team work is exercised. -0,60 22 -0,92 18 -1,09 8 -0,85 19

16 traditionall gender role stereotyps are critically reflected.-0,45 25 -0,55 26 -0,93 12 -0,67 23

17 peace education takes place. -0,63 19 -0,97 14 -0,86 16 -0,90 17

18 It is taught how to learn. -0,89 9 -1,76 1 -1,42 1 -1,64 1

19 ein Bewußtsein staatsbürgerlicher Rechte & Pflichten geweckt wird.-0,86 12 -1,20 10 -1,20 4 -1,05 10

20 interdisciplinary connections are made explicit. -0,67 17 -1,09 12 -1,33 3 -1,07 9

21 assertivity is trained. -0,93 6 -1,47 3 -0,80 20 -1,09 8

22 sensitivity towards nature is promoted. -0,46 24 -1,29 7 -1,15 6 -1,00 11

23 the importance of the mass media is made explicit. -0,60 20 -0,85 22 -0,88 13 -0,92 14

24 students are motivated to act in civil disobidience if necessary.-0,75 13 -1,21 9 -1,41 2 -1,24 3

25 religious attitudes are promoted. 0,26 29 -0,08 28 -0,37 27 -0,46 27

26 self-disciplin is trained. -0,20 28 0,08 29 -0,79 21 -0,54 26

27 competences on compouters are taught. -1,22 1 -1,66 2 -0,20 28 -1,25 2

28 enjoyment of great art is stirred/deepend. -0,31 27 -0,90 20 -0,82 19 -0,81 21

29 the abilities to work at a university are taught. -0,93 5 -0,99 13 -0,42 26 -0,39 28

Analysis of Discrepances

Page 23: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Strategies• Do not try to work with all data at once• Find those aims which show a high homogenity between

the groups (STP)• Find out which goals are most important/most urgent• Dived the goals into long-term, middle-term and short

term goals• Form a few working groups (including memebrs of all

three groups STP), each only dealing with one topic at once

• How can the realization of the goals be examined? (Self-Evaluation)

Page 24: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Goal Evaluation Grid

Goal…… important for Students&Teachers/Parents

… mainly important for group…

Short-term: … …

Middle-term: … …

Long-term: … …

Page 25: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Realisization-Check (on all levels)

Degree of Obligation- Must (Obligation)- Ought (Option)- Allowed (Self-Obligation/Wish)

Degree of Motivation- Want (wilingness)

Kompetenzgrad- Can (potential)

Reality

Start level:-Old Aims-Ols Procedure(s)

Vision 1Single loop:- Old Aims- New Procedure(s)

Vision 2Double loop:- New Aim- New Procedure(s)

Page 26: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

TEST1 OPERATION TEST2 EXIT

T O T E – Approach(Miller, Galanter & Pribram 1960)

Page 27: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

1. What is the Problem? (Who defines the Problem, how?)

2. Positiv formulation of the Aim and Controlability?

3. How can be observed (by the participants) that the Aim is realized?

4. Situation of Realization (where? when? what? how long? ...)

5. Ecological Check (who is affectede & to what extent?)

6. Is additional Help necessary?

7. Are there any further Obstacles?

8. Distribution of Work/Responsibilities: Who does what, together with whom, when, where, how, until when...?

9. Implementation/Realization

Page 28: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

EVALUATIONSSCHRITTE & PROBLEME Wer darf mitmachen? Wer darf mitentscheiden? Auf welcher Grundlage wird entschieden?

Art der Evaluation, Evaluationsinstrument

Festlegung der Evaluationsbereiche

MSS: ca. 6-8 Monate BASISEVALUATION - PHASE I:

DIAGNOSE Erhebung der Stärken und Schwächen

(IST-ZUSTÄNDE und der SOLL-WERTE)

MSS: 1 Tag Datenpräsentation

Mind. 1-2 Tage Dateninterpretation

Planung konkreter Interventionen

(Problemdefinition, Zielfestlegung, Methodenwahl, Festlegung von Erfolgskriterien und Evaluationsdesgin)

Prä-Messung 1 Prä-Messung 2 Prä-Messung 3 Intervention 1 Intervention 2 Intervention 3

(z.B. Schulforum) (z.B. Begabtenförderung) (z.B. neue Hausordnung)

Post-Messung 1 Post-Messung 2 Post-Messung 3

2-4 Jahre nach Erstevaluation

BASISEVALUATION-PHASE II VERÄNDERUNGSMESSUNG

Page 29: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Example III: MSS-Online – Data Feedback (Screen)

Page 30: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Example: MSS-Online – Data Feedback (Graphic Output)

Page 31: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Example IV: MSS-Online – Data Feedback (Percetage of answers given to open questions))

Page 32: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Example V: MSS-Online – Data Feedback (list of answers to open questions)

Page 33: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

PISA & TIMSS Tasks in MSS – a further possibility

(Two examples of PISA & TIMSS Tasks which could be Implemented in a MSS Evaluation)

Page 34: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

TIMSS Task Example

Given (see right): A cylinder with a length of 12 inches and the circumference of the circle of 4 inches. A thread is symmetrically twisted four times around the cylinder.

Question: How long is the thread?

Page 35: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Solution of the „Cylinder Problem“:

First it is necessary to have some knowledge about the surface of a cylinder: it consists of two circles and a rectangle (see rough draft at the right). The cylinder is 12 inches long (=one side of the rectangle). The circumference of the circle is 4 inches (the short side of the rectangle). Since the row is four times symmetrically wound around the cylinder we get four rectangles with the cathetuses having 4 inches and 3 inches (=12/4). Now we only have to apply the Pythagorean theorem and get the length of the long sinde of the rectangle: 42 + 32 = 25. So the length of the long side of the rectangle which is the square root of 25 namely 5 inches. Now we only have to take four times this length and receive the result: 20 inches.

Page 36: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

Relative Solution Frequency of the „Cylinder Problem“

Page 37: Module Approach to Self-Evaluation of School Development Projects © 2000 University Salzburg Riffert&Paschon Module Approach (Module pool – Items/Statements

A student thinks that a plant needs minerals in order to grow. S/he puts the plant into the sun (see image and conditions).

To examine

this hypothesis

s/he needs

another flower.

Which one

does she have

to choose?

sunlight, sand, minerals and water

A)

dark wardrobe, sand, minerals and water

B)

dark wardrobe, sand and water

C)

sunlight and only sand

D)

sunlight, sand and water

E)

sunlight, sand and minerals

(TIMSS; Baumert et al. 1997, 75)