18
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie March 25, 2009 Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The Torre Aquila Deployment IN4316 Seminar Wireless Sensor Networks Panagiotis Afratis March 25, 2009 Matteo Ceriotti, Luca Mottola, Gian Pietro Picco, Amy L. Murphy, Stefan Guna, Michele Corrà, Matteo Pozzi, Daniele Zonta, Paolo Zanon University of Trento, Italy 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN09), April 13-16, 2009, San Francisco, USA

Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie

March 25, 2009

Monitoring Heritage Buildings withWireless Sensor Networks: The Torre Aquila Deployment

IN4316 Seminar Wireless Sensor NetworksPanagiotis AfratisMarch 25, 2009

Matteo Ceriotti, Luca Mottola, Gian Pietro Picco, Amy L. Murphy, Stefan Guna, Michele Corrà, Matteo Pozzi, Daniele Zonta, Paolo Zanon

University of Trento, Italy

8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN09), April 13-16, 2009, San Francisco, USA

Page 2: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Introduction

• Preservation of heritage buildings• Monitoring vibrations, temperature, and humidity

• Torre Aquila• A 31 meter-tall medieval tower

in the city of Trento (Italy)

presentation progress:

Page 3: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Introduction

• Peculiarity of the Torre Aquila WSN Deployment• Heterogeneity• Temporal span• Online tasking

presentation progress:

Page 4: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Overview

• Related Work• Hardware• Software Design• Deployment• Evaluation• Conclusion

presentation progress:

Page 5: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Related Work

• Environmental monitoring applications• low-power operation allowing them to run for long periods• high-rate, high-fidelity ones running only for a relatively short time

• Most deployments deal only with monitoring vibrations• Bottom-up hardware design for a given deployment• In software, mostly feature ad-hoc implementations

presentation progress:

Page 6: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Hardware

• 3Mate! WSN nodes (TI MSP430 CPU, ChipCon 2420 Radio)

• 4 different customization of nodes• Environmental nodes• Deformation nodes• Acceleration nodes• Sink node

presentation progress:

Page 7: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Software Design

• Software Architecture

• TeenyLIME

presentation progress:

Page 8: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Software Design

• Sampling and Data Collection (1)• Requirements and challenges

• Two classes of trafficI. Bursty, high-rate data with strong reliability requirementsII. Low-rate data with weak reliability requirements

presentation progress:

Page 9: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Software Design

• Sampling and Data Collection (2)• Design and implementation

Handing sampled data over for routing towards the sink.

presentation progress:

Page 10: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Software Design

• Time Synchronization• Design and implementation

• Tasking and Data Dissemination• TeenyLime : Deployment-driven Enhancements

• Typed tuples and dynamic memory• Automatic field types.• Reliable, low-power operations.

presentation progress:

Page 11: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Deployment• Node Placement [16 Nodes]

(3 Acceleration, 2 Deformation, 11 Environmental, plus Sink node)

presentation progress:

Page 12: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Deployment

• Data Visualizationand Access

presentation progress:

Page 13: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Evaluation

• Reliable delivery of data (1)• Overall data loss rate always remained below 0.01%

presentation progress:

Page 14: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Evaluation

• Reliable delivery of data (2)

presentation progress:

Page 15: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Evaluation

• Effective compression of acceleration readings• Use of Huffman compression scheme

presentation progress:

Page 16: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Evaluation

• Energy consumption and system lifetime

presentation progress:

Page 17: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Evaluation

• Programming effort

• Decoupling and reusability

presentation progress:

Page 18: Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The

Conclusion

• The deployment faces successfully the challenges of • Heterogeneity• Temporal span• Online tasking

• WSN achieves highly reliable data delivery• The use of the TeenyLIME middleware offers highly

reusable and easily extensible software services• Deployment of the system in other heritage buildings

will verify the flexibility and reusability of the design

presentation progress: