72
- i - Monroe County and Monroe County Bar Association Assigned Counsel Program 2011 Amended Annual Report Maggie Brooks*, Monroe County Executive Steven C. Bowman*, Director of Public Safety Susan Schultz Laluk*, Esq., President, Monroe County Bar Association *2011 Submitted by: Charles T. Noce, Esq., Conflict Defender *2014 for 2011 Date: April 3, 2014

Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- i -

Monroe County and

Monroe County Bar Association

Assigned Counsel Program 2011 Amended Annual Report

Maggie Brooks*, Monroe County Executive Steven C. Bowman*, Director of Public Safety Susan Schultz Laluk*, Esq., President, Monroe County Bar Association *2011 Submitted by: Charles T. Noce, Esq., Conflict Defender *2014 for 2011 Date: April 3, 2014

Page 2: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- ii -

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1

"To Provide Quality Representation" .................................................................................................... 1 "To Provide A Coordinated And Centralized Assignment System For Conflict Cases" ....................... 2 "To Provide A More Equitable Distribution Of Conflict Assignments Among Lawyers" ...................... 2 "To Attract More Lawyers Willing To Handle Conflict Assignments" ................................................... 3 "To Maintain Uniform And Proper Billing Practices And To Ensure Cost Accountability Of Services" 4 "To Provide Increased Efficiency For The Courts" ............................................................................... 4

NEW ATTORNEYS IN 2011 .……………………………………………………………………………………....5 TOTAL CASES REFERRED BY PANEL 2006-20111.………………………………………………………….6 2011 ASSIGNMENTS.………………………………………………………………………………………………7

2011 Homicide Assignments……….………………………………………………………………………...8 2011 ABC Felony Assignment…………………………………...…………………………………………..9 2011 DE Felony Assignment………………………………………………………………………………..14 2011 Misdemeanor Assignments….……………………………………………………………………….20 2011 Family Court Assignments……………………………………………………………………………27 2011 Apellate Assignments…………………………………………………………………………………33

2011 COSTS

BY PANEL……………….………………………………………………………………………………………….34

BY ATTORNEY………………………………………………...…………………………………………………..35

BY TYPE OF CASE………………………………………………………………………………………………..44

2011 TABLE OF PROGRAM USE BY JUDICIARY……………………………………………………………52 TYPES OF CASES REFERRED IN 2011……………………………………………………………….………61 CASE DISPOSITION IN 2011…………………………………………………………………….………….…..68

Page 3: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 1 -

Introduction 2011 was the twentieth year the Assigned Counsel Program operated in all

courts. It was also the ninth year of operation for the Conflict Defender Office.

In 2011 The Conflict Defender Office had a staff of 10 attorneys and three support staff. Outside support services such as investigation and service of process are done on a contract basis. The attorneys in the office represent clients in conflict cases in Family Court, Rochester City Court and all of the appellate courts. All cases in Local Criminal Court, all felony cases and all statutorily assigned cases in Superior Court are still assigned to private counsel under the Joint Monroe County/Monroe County Bar Association Plan for Conflict Assignments.

The following statistical information shows the Program's relative success in meeting the goals of the Plan:

"The objectives of this conflict assignments plan are to provide quality representation to eligible indigent defendants or other litigants in those cases where the Public Defender has a conflict of interest; to provide a coordinated and centralized assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict assignments among lawyers; to attract more lawyers willing to handle conflict assignments; to maintain uniform and proper billing practices; to ensure cost accountability of services, and to provide increased efficiency for the courts by making qualified attorneys more readily available to handle conflict cases." Monroe County Bar Association Sponsored Plan for Conflict Assignments, ARTICLE II. Plan Objectives

"To Provide Quality Representation" 2011 saw a significant increase in case assignments to the Conflict Defender

Office from Family Court. The Conflict Defender Office has only four attorneys assigned to the same number of parts. There is no way that four attorneys can adequately cover all the parts. Additionally, the Public Defenders Office has two full-time paralegals assigned to Family Court while the Conflict Defender Office has none. Paralegals greatly reduce the amount of office time that attorneys must spend on document preparation giving the attorneys more time for court appearances and client counseling. The demands placed on attorney time by Family Treatment Court and the

Page 4: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 2 -

new Permanency legislation – requiring hearings every six months – continued to pose a coverage problem for the Conflict Defender Office in 2011.

In response to this developing issue, the office had successfully applied for two Grants from The New York State Office of Indigent Legal Services that will allow for the hiring of two full time Family Court attorneys starting in January of 2012 to address this issue. These two Grant positions will be each be funded for three year terms.

Since the CLE requirements of the Assigned Counsel Program overlap with the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirements of the State of New York, compliance is 100%.

"To Provide A Coordinated And Centralized Assignment System For Conflict Cases"

The Assigned Counsel Program is fully computerized. The Program enters all cases reported to it in a centralized database that tracks the representation from assignment through payment of the voucher. This system avoids duplication of representation by showing all open cases for a particular client, thus insuring that there is a continuity of representation if the client is arrested on new charges. This system also promptly closes any case thus clearing any potential conflict of interest that the Conflict Defender might have in representing the client in future cases.

Assignments referred by the courts continue to be assigned from a rotating list of available attorneys who are qualified for varying panels. The Program is very successful in insuring continuity of counsel where a client is re-arrested on new charges, even when the arrests span differing jurisdictions. Additionally, the Program continues to track conflict of interest information so that counsel is not unnecessarily assigned when the Conflict Defender Office could ethically continue.

Through the efficiency of the court’s requesting assignment of counsel in a timely manner, and the cooperation of the panel members, we were able to insure that no clients went without counsel regardless how short a notice of the next appearance our office received.

"To Provide A More Equitable Distribution Of Conflict Assignments Among Lawyers"

While not perfect, the Program does achieve a significant improvement over the previous system of assignment of conflict cases. The Program constantly strives for new and better systems to distribute assignments more equitably among the participating

Page 5: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 3 -

attorneys. In criminal cases, the current system is highly effective. There are still several local criminal courts that do not fully utilize the services of the Program in the assignment of counsel. This sometimes leads to a client having multiple attorneys for different pending charges. This results in increased and unnecessary costs to the taxpayer.

The District Attorney’s policy change regarding felony hearings causes a situation that skews the assignment distribution toward those attorneys who were most available for assignments. Since we need attorneys very quickly, those available when called got a disproportionate number of assignments. We are working on development of systems designed to alleviate this problem. Attorneys may notify us of availability on certain dates and at certain times so we may contact them when an assignment opportunity occurs on that date and time. Notice can be emailed, telephoned or faxed to our office. In addition, the first page of our web site contains a form that can be filled out and sent to us.

Equitable distribution of cases remained low in those Family Court cases not represented by the Conflict Defender staff. A mechanism must be found to address the inequities in Family Court assignments. The fact that a very few attorneys receive the bulk of the assignments places an undue burden on those attorneys and can impact directly on the quality of representation. More training through the appropriate committee of the Bar Association is necessary to familiarize the panel attorneys with local Family Court practice. The panel requirements for differing levels (custody/neglect versus removal proceedings) of Family Court representation are being revised and panel requirements are being enhanced so that issues regarding quality of representation are addressed.

"To Attract More Lawyers Willing To Handle Conflict Assignments"

Included in this report is a list of new panel members added during the 2011 calendar year. The Program continued to take every opportunity to remind the current panel members to apply for the more restrictive panels once they achieve the requisite qualifications. Panel applications, the volume of which had increased in 2010, continued at a robust rate, making available plenty of qualified assigned counsel members on all panels to more than meet requests for assignment of counsel.

Page 6: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 4 -

"To Maintain Uniform And Proper Billing Practices And To Ensure Cost Accountability Of Services"

As was the case in previous years, The Administrator reviews each voucher before processing to insure compliance with the voucher regulations and notifies each attorney of any noncompliance to educate the attorney on proper procedures. The review and notification help maintain proper and uniform billing practices among the participating attorneys.

The District Attorney’s policy regarding felony hearings negatively affected the overall cost of the Assigned Counsel Program. Attorneys were forced to spend more time in court and more time attempting to obtain information previously obtained before or during the felony hearing. Additionally, more cases that would have been screened by the felony hearing process were indicted leading to increased time spent in hearings and trials.

"To Provide Increased Efficiency For The Courts" Courts fully utilizing the services of the Assigned Counsel Program report a

positive impact on the efficiency in obtaining assigned counsel in conflict cases. They report a significant decrease in the burden on the court staff in finding attorneys willing to accept assignments, a decrease in the number of phone calls necessary to contact an attorney for assignment, a decrease in the voucher processing time since the vouchers are now clearly labeled as to the matter and already reviewed with comments by the Administrator, and a prompt response from the Assigned Counsel Program in obtaining assigned counsel.

Due in no small part to the number of dedicated attorneys serving on the assigned counsel panels, and the staff attorneys in the Office of The Conflict Defender, a very high quality of representation in all of the criminal, family, and appellate courts was continued in 2011.

Page 7: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 5 -

New Attorneys in 20111 Panel

Attorney ABC Felony

DE Felony Misdemeanor Family Court

Appellate Grand Total

Abbatoy Jr., David x 1

Astacio, Leticia x x x x 4

Barnes, Stephanie x x x x 4

Guarino, Michael x x x 3

Lamb, Robert x x x x 4

Roxin, Richard x x x x 4

Session, Jerry x x x x 4

Wesley, Sarah x x 2

Grand Total 5 7 7 6 1 26

1 Panel for which the attorney was approved in 2011. Attorney may have been approved in a previous year for a different panel or panels

Page 8: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 6 -

Total Cases Referred by Panel 2006-20112 Year

Panel 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

ABC Felony 641 663 683 641 590 534

Appellate 46 53 55 53 44 45

DE Felony 496 493 531 508 606 537

Family Court 1755 1693 1745 2470 2940 2867

Misdemeanor 2008 1995 2496 2458 2703 2759

Other 26 54 42 47 50 45

Probation/Parole 198 221 211 225 221 298

Grand Total 5170 5172 5763 6402 7154 7085

2. Does not represent number of assignments made, only initial cases referred for assignment.

Page 9: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 7 -

2011 Assignments3 The following charts show the assignments each attorney received in 2011. The

number of assignments is higher than the number of cases referred because in some cases more than one attorney receives an assignment for a case. Also, an attorney might be assigned in 2011 to a case originally referred in a previous year. This occurs most often after a court relieves one attorney and either the court or the Assigned Counsel Program assigns a new attorney.

Several factors should be considered in looking at these tables. First, approved panel members receive more assignments than non-approved panel members do. Some of the attorneys with a low number of assignments are non-approved panel members. Most often, such an attorney is court assigned. Secondly, those attorneys gaining membership on a panel for the first time during 2011 will have fewer assignments in that panel because they were not on the panel for an entire year. Thirdly, a number of attorneys decline a significant number of assignments, requested removal from the Program for periods of time or resigned from the Program during 2011. While the report includes non-approved attorneys, new panel members, attorneys declining appointments, and attorneys temporarily removed from panels at their own request, concentrating on those members who participated for the full year as approved members of a particular panel gives a truer picture of the equitable distribution of assignments.

The success of the program in achieving equitable distribution of cases is excellent when compared with other New York jurisdictions.

Of particular significance in this report is the fact that in the criminal courts, where the Assigned Counsel Program assigns a large percentage of cases, there is a more even distribution of assignments. This is attributable to the fact that, by comparison, Family Court has a much lower percentage of cases assigned by the Assigned Counsel Program. Most assignments are directly by the court. Attaining more equitable distribution of cases is difficult, if not impossible. The Administrator and Advisory Committee must work diligently to provide a workable solution to the inequities of the Family Court assignments. Looking at the last column of the tables, it takes significantly fewer attorneys for the Family Court assignments to reach a high percentage than it does for the criminal court assignments. This is less of a concern since the Conflict Defender Office represents the bulk of the conflict cases in Family Court.

3 Only assignments to new clients or to old clients with more serious charges are counted here.

Page 10: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 8 -

Nonetheless, it is an issue that should be addressed for those cases where the Conflict Defender Office cannot represent the client in Family Court.

2011 Homicide Assignments

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

ACP Ciardi, Francis M 1 1

Cocuzzi, Thomas 1 1

Damelio, Joseph 3 3

Easton, William T 1 1

Funk, Mark 1 1

Krane, Joel 1 1

Lamb, Meredith 1 1

Morabito, David R 1 1

Murante, David 1 1

Nobles, James 1 1

Vacca, Paul 1 1

ACP Total 5 8 13

CDO Total 0 0 0

Grand Total 5 8 13

Page 11: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 9 -

2011 ABC Felony Assignments Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

ACP Ajaka, Maroun 4 3 7

Annechino, John A. 4 4

Aramini, Mary E. 4 4

Astacio, Leticia D 6 9 15

Aureli, Daniel L. 3 6 9

Barnes, Stefanie 4 1 5

Bitetti, Gary 3 1 4

Bourtis, Eftihia 6 1 7

Bowman, Jason J. 5 5

Brown, James E. 9 1 10

Catalano, Christian A. 4 4

Ciardi, Francis M. 6 4 10

Cocuzzi, Thomas J. 3 4 7

Damelio, Joseph S. 3 3 6

DeCarolis, Brian 3 5 8

DeJohn, Timothy W. 3 3

DiPalma, Jeffrey P. 2 2

DiPrima, Michael T. 2 2

DiSalvo, Thomas J. 7 7

Easton, William T. 4 4

Egger, Jan P. 4 2 6

Falk, Jr., Terrance A. 3 3

Farrell-Gallagher, Barbara E. 8 8

Page 12: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 10 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Feindt, Mary E. 6 2 8

Funk, Mark D. 4 1 5

Ganguly, Avik K. 8 5 13

Garretson, Scott A. 8 1 9

Gross, Richard R. 6 6

Guarino, Michael 4 4

Guerrieri, Paul 3 14 17

Hinman, James S. 6 6

Holliday, Billie D. 4 1 5

Housel, Jason M. 5 2 7

Hummel, Chad M. 1 1 2

Hurwitz, Phillip R. 5 5

Hyland, Kenneth 5 2 7

Infantino, Marc 5 5

Johnson, Christopher G. 4 1 5

Kasperek, Lawrence L. 4 4

Kaul, Richard A. 1 1

Kennedy, Christian J. 2 5 7

Krane, Joel N. 3 1 4

Kristal, Peter L. 2 2

LaDuca, John J. 1 1

Lamb, III, Robert G. 4 2 6

Lamb, Meredith M.B. 4 4

Leegant, Jo Anne 3 3

Page 13: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 11 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Lester, Frederick 7 1 8

MacAulay, Paul D. 5 5

Marley, Allison L. 1 1

McCarthy, II, Martin Patrick 1 1

McKain, Kevin 5 1 6

Mix, Matthew J. 2 2

Monaghan, Lori Robb 6 6

Morabito, David R. 3 2 5

Morabito, Kevin A. 1 1

Muldoon, Gary 1 1

Murante, David A. 10 5 15

Nadler, Christian M. 3 3

Napier, James A. 1 1

Napier, Robert A. 1 1

Napolitano, Lorenzo 6 2 8

Nobles, Jamie Lee 1 1

Noce, Charles T. 2 2

Oathout, Bryan 10 7 17

Owens, David L. 3 3

Perez, Gilbert R. 2 5 7

Pilato, Charles M. 1 1 2

Pullano, Peter J. 5 5

Ratchford, Beth A. 5 1 6

Riotto, II, James L. 1 1

Page 14: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 12 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Rizzo, James J. 5 1 6

Rodeman, Christopher K. 3 3 6

Rose, Angelo A. 1 1 2

Roxin, Richard C 1 2 3

Rumi, Fares A. 3 1 4

Russell, Dianne C. 5 1 6

Russi, Patrick K. 1 2 3

Schiano, Jr., Charles A. 3 3

Schiano, Michael P. 2 2 4

Schmitt, Michael D. 4 4

Scibetta, Michael P. 2 2 4

Session, Jerry 2 2

Shepard, Zuleika Z. 1 1

Shulman, Brian J. 6 2 8

Siragusa, Lisa Serio 1 1

Sperano, Aaron J. 6 1 7

Stowe, Eric W. 3 3 6

Thomas-Diaz, Kathleen 5 5

Thompson, Donald M. 3 3

Tuohey, Michael J. 1 1

Turner, Karen Bailey 3 3

Vacca, James P. 6 1 7

Vacca, Jr., Paul J. 4 2 6

Valleriani, Sam L. 8 8

Page 15: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 13 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Wesley, Sarah 1 2 3

Wood, Robert W. 5 1 6

Young, D. Scott 6 6

Young, Mark A. 5 5 10

Zimberlin, John F. 3 1 4

Zimmermann, Jr., Clark J. 3 2 5

ACP Total 357 164 521

CDO Total

Grand Total 357 164 521

Page 16: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 14 -

2011 DE Felony Assignments Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

ACP Ajaka, Maroun 4 1 5

Annechino, John A. 3 1 4

Aramini, Mary E. 1 1

Astacio, Leticia D 2 4 6

Aureli, Daniel L. 2 1 3

Barnes, Stefanie 8 2 10

Barraco, Ted A. 1 1

Bitetti, Gary 4 2 6

Bourtis, Eftihia 3 3

Bowman, Jason J. 9 3 12

Brown, James E. 6 1 7

Buettner, Brian C. 5 1 6

Catalano, Christian A. 2 8 10

Chait, Mitchell A 1 1 2

Ciardi, Francis M. 4 3 7

Cocuzzi, Thomas J. 1 2 3

Colombo, Jeanne M. 1 1

Damelio, Joseph S. 1 1

DeCarolis, Brian 4 5 9

Dedes, Williams C. 1 1

DeJohn, Timothy W. 2 2

DiPalma, Jeffrey P. 1 1

DiSalvo, Thomas J. 6 1 7

Page 17: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 15 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Dolan, Eric 2 2

Duclos, Marc A. 1 1

Easton, William T. 2 2

Egger, Jan P. 3 1 4

Falk, Jr., Terrance A. 1 1

Farrell-Gallagher, Barbara E. 5 1 6

Feindt, Mary E. 6 4 10

Flowerday, Michael D. 2 1 3

Fulmer, Daniel C. 1 1

Funk, Mark D. 3 1 4

Ganguly, Avik K. 5 9 14

Garretson, Scott A. 6 4 10

Gianforti, Gary J. 3 3

Gross, Richard R. 2 1 3

Guarino, Michael 3 3

Guerrieri, Paul 2 15 17

Hinman, James S. 4 3 7

Holliday, Billie D. 4 4

Housel, Jason M. 5 1 6

Hummel, Chad M. 3 1 4

Hurwitz, Phillip R. 2 2

Hyland, Kenneth 2 1 3

Infantino, Marc 3 3

Johnson, Christopher G. 1 2 3

Page 18: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 16 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Jones, Rhian Dudson 2 2

Josh, Sylvia W. 5 5

Kasperek, Lawrence L. 2 2

Kennedy, Christian J. 4 3 7

Khuns, Kevin M. 3 1 4

Krane, Joel N. 4 4

Kristal, Peter L. 3 3

Lamb, III, Robert G. 2 2

Lamb, Meredith M. B. 3 3

Leegant, Jo Anne 4 3 7

Lester, Frederick 7 1 8

MacAulay, Paul D. 3 1 4

Maggio, Frank G. 1 1

Marley, Allison L. 1 1

McCarthy, II, Martin Patrick 5 5

McKain, Kevin 4 1 5

Merante, Vincent E. 2 3 5

Meyer, Melissa A. 1 1

Mix, Matthew J. 1 2 3

Monaghan, Lori Robb 4 4

Morabito, David R. 1 3 4

Morabito, Kevin A. 1 1 2

Mort, Lawrence D. 1 1

Murante, David A. 11 5 16

Page 19: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 17 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Jones, Rhian Dudson 2 2

Murante, David A. 11 5 16

Murante, Kathleen 1 1

Nadler, Christian M. 2 2

Nafus, Matthew D. 3 3

Napier, James A. 2 2

Napier, Robert A. 1 1

Napolitano, Lorenzo 5 8 13

Nobles, Jamie Lee 2 3 5

Noce, Charles T. 1 1

Oathout, Bryan 4 5 9

Owens, David L. 3 3

Palmiere, David M. 2 2

Paluch, Stephen James 1 1

Parks, Anthony 2 2

Pennica, Kenneth L. 2 2

Perez, Gilbert R. 6 2 8

Pilato, Charles M. 1 1

Pilato, David C. 2 2

Pullano, Peter J. 2 2

Ratchford, Beth A. 5 2 7

Riotto, II, James L 1 3 4

Rizzo, James J. 3 1 4

Rodeman, Christopher K. 3 1 4

Page 20: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 18 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Rose, Angelo A. 1 1

Roxin, Richard C. 2 2

Ruby, William S. 1 1

Rumi, Fares A. 3 3

Russell, Dianne C. 2 1 3

Russi, Patrick K. 4 1 5

Ryan, Scott A. 2 2

Schiano, Christopher 1 1

Schiano, Jr., Charles A. 2 3 5

Schiano, Michael P. 2 2 4

Schiano, Sr., Charles A. 1 1

Schmitt, Michael D. 1 2 3

Scibetta, Michael P. 6 2 8

Session, Jerry 4 4

Shepard, Zuleika Z. 1 4 5

Shulman, Brian J. 7 7

Siragusa, Lisa Serio 1 1

Sperano, Aaron J. 3 1 4

Stowe, Eric W. 5 2 7

Thomas-Diaz, Kathleen 3 3

Thompson, Donald M. 1 1

Tuohey, Michael J 2 2

Turner, Karen Bailey 3 3

Turner, Robert P. 2 2

Page 21: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 19 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Vacca, James P. 5 1 6

Vacca, Jr., Paul J. 4 4

Valleriani, Sam L. 4 14 18

Walsh, Jr., James E. 1 2 3

Wesley, Sarah 2 1 3

Wisner, Todd J.W. 1 1

Wood, Robert W. 4 4

Young, D. Scott 3 3

Young, Mark A. 2 5 7

Zimberlin, John F. 5 5

Zimmermann, Jr., Clark J. 3 3

ACP Total 352 185 537

CDO Total 0 0 0

Grand Total 352 185 537

Page 22: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 20 -

2011 Misdemeanor Assignments Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

ACP Ajaka, Maroun 10 6 16

Annechino, John A. 8 2 10

Aramini, Mary E. 3 3

Asamoah-Wade, Yolanda A. 7 7

Astacio, Leticia D. 8 1 9

Aureli, Daniel L. 3 7 10

Barnes, Stefanie 12 3 15

Barraco, Ted A. 6 6

Beretta, Frank 2 2

Bitetti, Gary 7 7 14

Bourne, Leah K. 3 3

Bourtis, Eftihia 4 1 5

Bowman, Jason J. 21 3 24

Brooker, James G. 2 2

Brown, James E. 9 9

Buettner, Brian C. 9 1 10

Byrnes, James M. 9 9

Catalano, Christian A. 2 14 16

Chait, Mitchell A. 8 8

Cianca, Mark F. 2 4 6

Ciardi, Francis M. 18 7 25

Cocuzzi, Thomas J. 2 5 7

Colombo, Jeanne M. 1 1

Connor, Ann Elizabeth 1 1

Page 23: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 21 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

D'Arpino, John Joseph 4 2 6

DeCarolis, Brian 6 5 11

Dedes, William C. 2 1 3

DeJohn, Timothy W. 5 5

Demo-Vazquez, Kristine M. 4 4 8

Dever, Richard W 1 1

DiPalma, Jeffrey P. 2 2

DiPalma, Michael T. 1 1

DiSalvo, Thomas J. 6 1 7

Dolan, Eric 6 6

Dollinger, Alison 5 7 12

Duclos, Marc A. 2 6 8

Egger, Jan P. 1 1 2

Falk, Jr., Terrance A. 4 4

Farrell-Gallagher, Barbara E. 10 8 18

Feindt, Mary E. 6 3 9

Ferlicca, John J. 1 1

Flowerday, Michael D. 2 2

Fulmer, Daniel C. 5 15 20

Funk, Mark D. 8 2 10

Ganguly, Anjan K. 1 1

Ganguly, Avik K. 13 10 23

Garretson, Scott A. 9 5 14

Getz, Jon P. 1 1

Gianforti, Gary J. 2 2

Page 24: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 22 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Gibbons, Patricia Ann 1 1 2

Gladstone, Katherine 9 9

Goldman, Ronald S. 2 2

Gravelle, Jeffrey D. 2 2

Gross, Richard R. 9 7 16

Guarino, Michael 1 2 3

Guerrieri, Paul 12 24 36

Handelman, Eric D. 2 2

Hardies, Robert M. 4 2 6

Harris, John T. 3 3

Hartt, James D. 4 4

Hinkley, Kim A. 2 2

Hinman, James S. 11 2 13

Holliday, Billie D. 10 3 13

Housel, Jason M. 12 4 16

Hummel, Chad M. 5 1 6

Hurwitz, Phillip R. 1 3 4

Hyland, Kenneth 2 3 5

Infantino, Marc 9 9

Ingersoll, Timothy E. 1 1

Jain, Rekha 11 11

Johnson, Christopher G. 6 3 9

Jones, Rhian Dudson 5 5

Josh, Sylvia W. 10 1 11

Karatas, Nigos 1 1

Page 25: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 23 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Kennedy, Christian J. 7 1 8

Khuns, Kevin M. 20 9 29

King, Jr., William H. 1 1 2

Kovalsky, Shaina 2 2

Krane, Joel N. 3 3 6

Kristal, Peter L. 8 1 9

LaBue, Eugene P. 5 5

LaDuca, John J. 4 4

Lahman, Janice Allen 2 2

Lamb, III, Robert G. 1 3 4

Lamb, Meredith M. B. 7 1 8

Leegant, Jo Anne 1 1 2

Lester, Frederick 13 1 14

MacAulay, Paul D. 1 1

Maggio, Frank G. 11 3 14

Marcera, Jr., Salvatore J. 4 4

Marley, Allison L. 3 3

Mastrella, Daniel J. 1 1

McCarthy, II, Martin Patrick 6 6

McCarty, Terence 4 4

McClenathan, Edward W. 2 5 7

McKain, Kevin 12 1 13

Merante, Vincent E. 2 9 11

Meyer, Melissa A. 2 1 3

Mix, Matthew J. 5 1 6

Page 26: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 24 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Monaghan, Lori Robb 5 2 7

Morabito, David R. 1 3 4

Morabito, Kevin A. 1 1

Mort, Lawrence D. 1 1

Murante, David A. 31 2 33

Murante, Kathleen 6 5 11

Nadler, Christian M. 6 4 10

Nafus, Matthew D. 1 1

Napier, James A. 3 3

Napolitano, Lorenzo 6 3 9

Nobles, Jamie Lee 1 1 2

Noce, Charles T. 2 2

Oathout, Bryan 11 5 16

O'Neill, Jr., Raymond B. 2 2

O'Toole, Keith 2 5 7

Owens, David L. 9 2 11

Palmiere, David M. 1 1

Paluch, Stephen James 2 2

Parks, Anthony 7 7

Paulino, James M. 2 2

Pennica, Kenneth L. 4 4

Perez, Gilbert R. 9 4 13

Pilato, Charles M. 1 1 2

Pilato, David C. 4 2 6

Pullano, Peter J. 1 1 2

Page 27: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 25 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Randall, Mary W. 1 1

Ratchford, Beth A. 13 5 18

Reardon, Kathleen P. 4 4

Redmond, Gregg H. 9 1 10

Riotto, II, James L. 8 8 16

Rizzo, James J. 7 2 9

Rodeman, Christopher K. 5 1 6

Rogoff, Stephen D. 1 1

Rosner, Leonard A. 4 4

Ruby, William S. 2 2

Rumi, Fares A. 9 9

Russell, Dianne C. 1 1 2

Russi, Patrick K. 6 16 22

Ryan, Scott A. 4 4

Schiano, Christopher 1 4 5

Schiano, Jr., Charles A. 1 1

Schiano, Michael P. 1 1 2

Schiano, Sr., Charles A. 1 1 2

Schmitt, Michael D. 6 2 8

Scibetta, Michael P. 6 2 8

Sekharan, Raja N. 4 4

Sercu, Stephen 1 2 3

Session, Jerry 4 2 6

Shepard, Zuleika Z. 2 2

Shramek, William J. 4 4

Page 28: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 26 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Shulman, Brian J. 9 20 29

Siragusa, Lisa Serio 3 3

Sperano, Aaron J. 9 1 10

Stern, Jon M. 6 6

Stowe, Eric W. 20 5 25

Thomas-Diaz, Kathleen 13 3 16

Thompson, Donald M. 1 1

Tuohey, Michael J. 5 3 8

Turner, Robert P. 2 2

Vacca, James P. 10 3 13

Vacca, Jr., Paul J. 3 1 4

Valleriani, Sam L. 7 19 26

Walsh, Jr., James E. 4 4

Welch, Jamie 5 5

Wesley, Sarah 3 1 4

Wisner, Todd J.W. 1 1 2

Wood, Robert W. 2 1 3

Young, D. Scott 4 5 9

Young, Mark A. 4 3 7

Zimberlin, John F. 8 8

Zimmermann, Jr., Clark J. 1 1

ACP Total 837 415 1252

CDO Crimi, Joseph P. 506

Milliken, David 459

Solomon, R. Adrian 542

Page 29: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 27 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

CDO Total 1507

Grand Total 837 415 2759

2011 Family Court Assignments Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

ACP Ajaka, Maroun 2 13 15

Annechino, John A. 2 2

Aramini, Mary E. 2 2

Asamoah-Wade, Yolanda A 4 10 14

Astacio, Leticia D 3 1 4

Badain, Lara R. 1 1

Barnes, Stefanie 2 8 10

Bitetti, Gary 1 1

Bourne, Leah K. 10 10 20

Bourtis, Efthia 4 4

Bowman, Jason J. 7 10 17

Brown, James E. 4 4

Budd, Alexander M. 1 1

Buettner, Brian C. 1 1 2

Byrnes, James M. 1 1

Callanan, Karen Smith 1 13 14

Page 30: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 28 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Chait, Mitchell A. 1 6 7

Chase, Carolyn L. 14 14

Ciardi, Francis M. 4 2 6

Cimino, Michelle Y. 1 1 2

Costello, Paul Keely 1 1

Crowder, Debra A. 1 1

D’Arpino, John Joseph 1 1

Davison, Mary P. 1 1

DeCarolis, Brian 1 1

DeJohn, Timothy W. 2 1 3

Demo-Vazquez, Kristine M. 2 4 6

DiSalvo, Thomas J. 1 1 2

Dollinger, Alison 2 21 23

Duclos, Marc A. 1 1

Elsner, Erin M. 3 3

Falk, Jr., Terrance A. 1 1

Farr, William H. 2 2

Farrell-Gallagher, Barbara E. 3 6 9

Feinberg, Heidi W. 1 1

Feindt, Mary E. 3 37 40

Fero, Matthew John 3 3

Flowerday, Michael D. 1 1

Forsyth, George K. 1 1

Funk, Mark D. 1 5 6

Page 31: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 29 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Gibbons, Patricia Ann 1 10 11

Gladstone, Katherine 3 8 11

Gravelle, Jeffrey D. 1 1

Gross, Richard R. 1 7 8

Guarino, Michael 1 2 3

Guerrieri, Paul 2 2

Handelman, Eric D. 15 15

Hartzell, Jr., Thomas C. 2 2

Hinman, James S. 1 11 12

Holliday, Billie D. 1 4 5

Hummel, Chad M. 1 1

Indivino, Deborah A. 1 1

Infantino, Marc 3 3

Jain, Rekha 7 1 8

Johnson, Christopher G. 1 1

Jones, Rhian Dudson 6 23 29

Josh, Sylvia W. 3 1 4

Kaplan, David M. 1 1 2

Karatas, Nigos 1 1

Kennedy, Christian J. 1 1 2

Khuns, Kevin M. 7 7 14

King, Jr., William H. 1 14 15

Kovalsky, Shaina 2 2

Krane, Joel N. 4 4

Page 32: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 30 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Kristal, Peter L. 4 4

Lahman, Janice Allen 2 2

Lamb, Meredith M. B. 1 6 7

Laragy, Susan 9 9

Leavy, Anthony 10 10

Leegant, Jo Anne 1 1

Lester, Frederick 5 5 10

Martin, Thomas N. 12 12

Maslow, Lisa J. 32 32

McCarty, Terence 2 2

McClenathan, Edward W. 3 1 4

McKain, Kevin 5 5

McMullen, Margaret 1 13 14

Menard, John 3 4 7

Merante, RoseMaria 20 20

Monaghan, Lori Robb 1 6 7

Morabito, David R. 1 1

Muldoon, Gary 1 1

Nafus, Matthew D. 7 7

Napolitano, Lorenzo 6 6

Nevarez, Juan A. 4 4

Oathout, Bryan 1 31 32

Owens, David L. 1 1

Paluch, Stephen James 1 1

Page 33: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 31 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Pappalardo, Fauna M. 6 6

Perez, Gilbert R. 4 38 42

Pilaroscia, Marla J. 1 1

Ratchford, Beth A. 4 16 20

Reinstein, Natalia 3 3

Riotto, II, James L. 1 1

Rizzo, Seema Ali 1 1

Rogoff, Stephen D. 2 2

Rosner, Leonard A. 1 1

Rumi, Fares A. 4 1 5

Russi, Patrick K. 1 11 12

Ryan, Scott A. 1 1

Sadinsky, Lisa A. 1 1

Schmitt, Michael D. 2 4 6

Scibetta, Michael P. 2 2

Sekharan, Raja N. 1 1

Session, Jerry 4 4

Shulman, Brian J. 3 42 45

Siragusa, Lisa Serio 1 1

Sperano, Aaron J. 1 1 2

Stacy, Michael P. 1 1

Stern, Jon M. 1 27 28

Stowe, Eric W. 4 4

Taylor, Laura J. 1 1

Page 34: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 32 -

Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

Thomas-Diaz, Kathleen 3 3

Turner, Robert P. 3 45 48

Vacca, James P. 7 4 11

Van Loon, Nathan Allen 7 7

Walsh, Jr., James E. 3 3

Watkins, Paul B. 1 1

Weisbeck, Kimberly W. 3 3

Young, D. Scott 4 4

Young, Mark A. 3 3

Zunno, Harriet L. 1 1

ACP Total 173 706 879

Asamoah-Wade, Yolanda A. 363

Edwards, Tynise Y. 384

Khuns, Kevin 35

Leonardo, Stephanie N. 412

Palmisano, Chelsea 417

Thomson, Derek A. 377

CDO Total 1988

Grand Total 173 706 2867

Page 35: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 33 -

2011 Appellate Assignments Referral

Agency Attorney ACP Court Grand Total

ACP Bird, Stephen J. 1 1

Bourne, Leah K. 1 1

Davison, Mary P. 1 1

Gorman, Shirley A. 1 1

Kaplan, David M. 1 1

McCarthy, Il, Martin Patrick 1 1

Nafus, Matthew D. 1 1

Napolitano, Lorenzo 1 1

Reardon, Kathleen P. 1 1

CDO Czapranski, Kimberly J. 18 18

Provo, Kelley 12 1 13

Splain, Kristin F. 5 5

Page 36: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 34 -

2011 Costs by Panel4 PANEL AMOUNT

Homicide $ 144,310.69

All other ABC Felonies $ 965,739.31

DE Felonies $ 608,269.48

Misdemeanor $ 510,351.03

Family Court $ 738,966.17

Appellate $ 129,202.43

Parole/Probation $ 90,039.28

Other $ 42,621.82

Grand Total $ 3,229,500.21

4 Includes cases closed and paid in 2011 even if assigned in a prior year. Excludes administrative costs.

Page 37: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 35 -

2011 Costs by Attorney

Attorney Full Name Cost

Ajaka, Maroun $19,680.00

Annechino, John A. $12,135.00

Aramini, Mary E. $20,832.49

Asamoah-Wade, Yolanda A $5,256.00

Astacio, Leticia D $12,781.41

Aureli, Daniel L. $17,353.50

Badain, Lara R. $959.79

Barnes, Stefanie $27,095.87

Barr, Culver K. $712.50

Bernacki, Jr., John E. $420.00

Bitetti, Gary $14,287.50

Bourne, Leah K. $11,461.97

Bourtis, Efthia $18,637.50

Bowman, Jason J. $39,686.27

Brown, James E. $60,462.38

Buettner, Brian C. $11,549.54

Byrnes, James M. $2,382.00

Callanan, Karen Smith $3,862.50

Capanna, Paloma A. $13,349.23

Castellano, June $517.50

Catalano, Christian A. $36,732.00

Chait, Mitchell A. $4,517.25

Page 38: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 36 -

Attorney Full Name Cost

Chamblee, J.M. $911.25

Chase, Carolyn L. $6,390.00

Cianca, Mark F. $1,266.00

Ciardi, Francis M. $32,835.98

Cirando, John A. $342.75

Cocuzzi, Thomas J. 20,057.00

Colombo, Jeanne M. $345.00

Connor, Ann E. $765.00

Crowder, Debra A. $562.50

Damelio, Joseph S. $18,007.50

D’Arpino, John Joseph $660.00

Davison, Mary P. $8,902.22

DeCarolis, Brian $37,146.00

Dedes, William C. 1,410.00

DeJohn, Timothy W. $17,482.50

Demo-Vazquez, Kristine M. $3,609.39

DiPalma, Jeffrey P. $2,728.20

DiPrima, Michael T. $3,532.50

DiSalvo, Thomas J. $6,483.00

Dolan, Eric $1,308.00

Dollinger, Alison $17,576.45

Duclos, Marc A. $5,089.50

Easton, William T. $8,617.50

Egger, Jan P. 22,499.25

Page 39: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 37 -

Attorney Full Name Cost

Elsner, Erin M. $2,272.50

Falk, Jr., Terrance A. $8,075.07

Farr, William H. $165.00

Farrell-Gallagher, Barbara E. $33,190.73

Feindt, Mary E. $58,344.00

Felicca, John J. $2,818.12

Fero, Matthew John $8,342.86

Forsyth, George K. $382.50

Fulmer, Daniel C. $8,052.00

Funk, Mark D. $35,675.00

Gangarosa, Edward C. $240.00

Ganguly, Anjan K. $4,681.14

Ganguly, Avik K. $49,238.58

Garretson, Scott A. $87,774.95

Getz, Jon P. $24.00

Gianforti, Gary J. $1,081.50

Gibbons, Patricia Ann $7,298.25

Gladstone, Katherine $35,402.01

Goldman, Ronald S. $126.44

Gorman, Shirley A. $7,352.91

Gross, Richard R. $27,961.50

Guarino, Michael $10,360.50

Handelman, Eric D. $4,016.25

Hardies, Robert M. $1,260.00

Page 40: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 38 -

Attorney Full Name Cost

Hartt, James D. 4,974.00

Hinkley, Kim A. 84.00

Hinman, James S. $36,670.80

Holliday, Billie D. $21,503.25

Houde, Ardeth L. $3,933.50

Housel, Jason M. $45,943.50

Hummel, Chad M. $9,885.00

Hurwitz, Phillip R. $32,059.21

Hyland, Kenneth $28,572.44

Indivino, Deborah A. $273.59

Infantino, Marc $12,826.50

Ingersoll, Timothy E. $576.00

Jain, Rekha $9,917.06

Johnson, Christopher G. $9,663.00

Jones, Rhian Dudson $42,475.50

Josh, Sylvia W. $6,613.35

Kaplan, David M. $1,106.25

Karatas, Nigos $9,155.56

Kasperek, Lawrence L. $40,951.58

Kaul, Richard A. $330.00

Kennedy, Christian J. $48,508.12

Khuns, Kevin M. $64,356.48

King, Jr., William H. $7,147.50

Kovalsky, Shaina $3,034.56

Page 41: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 39 -

Attorney Full Name Cost

Krane, Joel N. $39,417.00

Kristal, Peter L. $9,468.50

LaBue, Eugene P. $1,320.00

LaDuca, John L. $1,443.00

Lahman, Janice Allen $4,827.69

Lamb, III, Robert G. $18,169.94

Lamb, Meredith M. B. $11,726.25

Laragy, Susan $9,396.60

Leavy, Anthony $39,747.50

Leegant, Jo Anne $21,250.80

Lester, Frederick $37,311.00

MacAulay, Paul D. $37,339.69

Maggio, Frank G. $9,081.00

Marcera, Jr., Salvatore J. $2,250.00

Marley, Allison L. $543.00

Martin, Thomas N. $3,827.25

Maslow, Lisa J. $13,401.35

Mastrella, Daniel J. $1,680.00

McCarthy, II, Martin P. $15,514.36

McCarty, Terence $997.50

McClenathan, Edward W. $3,591.98

McKain, Kevin $40,116.00

McKeown, John F. $450.23

McMullen, Margaret $5,767.50

Page 42: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 40 -

Attorney Full Name Cost

Menard, John $2,175.00

Merante, RoseMaria $23,340.00

Merante, Vincent E. $18,502.50

Mix, Matthew J. $10,278.38

Monaghan, Lori Robb $21,907.50

Morabito, David R. $26,217.54

Mort, Lawrence D. $150.00

Muldoon, Gary $21,324.62

Murante, David A. $84,354.05

Murante, Kathleen $3,477.73

Nafus, Matthew D. $21,835.50

Napier, James A. $5,208.00

Napier, Robert A. $9,942.80

Napolitano, Lorenzo $33,729.60

Nevarez, Juan A. $1,485.00

Nobles, James L. $14,266.50

Noce, Charles T. $12,495.00

Oathout, Bryan $71,450.25

Offen, Alan L. $585.00

O’Neill, Jr., Raymond B. $825.00

O’Toole, Keith $3,528.00

Owens, David L. $13,787.00

Palmiere, David M. $8,820.00

Paluch, Stephen James $5,303.11

Page 43: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 41 -

Attorney Full Name Cost

Parks, Anthony $8,715.45

Parrinello, J.M. $2,565.00

Paulino, James M. 186.00

Pennica, Kenneth L. $3,834.00

Perez, Gilbert R. $127,914.00

Pilato, Charles M. $5,415.00

Pilato, David C. $1,591.50

Pixley, William G. $16,927.50

Pullano, Peter J. $31,121.88

Randall, Mary W. $186.00

Ratchford, Beth A. $61,378.14

Rath, Timothy C. $318.00

Reardon, Kathleen P. $16,550.79

Redmond, Gregg H. $7,428.00

Riotto, II, James L. $11,092.50

Rizzo, James J. $16,947.00

Rizzo, Seema Ali $1,882.50

Rodeman, Christopher K. $18,273.75

Romeo, Stacey M. $4.087.50

Rose, Angleo A. $214.80

Rossow, Nicole A. $1,582.50

Roxin, Richard C. $1,908.80

Ruby, William S. $6,318.75

Rumi, Fares A. $30,220.48

Page 44: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 42 -

Attorney Full Name Cost

Russell, Dianne C. $16,878.00

Russi, Patrick K. $23,595.00

Ryan, Scott A. $2,365.50

Sadinsky, Lisa A. $1,304.50

Schiano, Christopher $1,533.00

Schiano, Jr., Charles A. $21,862.50

Schiano, Michael P. $11,790.00

Schiano, Sr., Charles A. $11,938.50

Schmitt, Michael D. $17,561.42

Scibetta, Michael P. $18,573.83

Sekharan, Raja N. $3,455.39

Sercu, Stephen $4,681.82

Session, Jerry $7,632.00

Shapiro, Robert A. $6,175.50

Shramek, William J. $1,722.00

Shulman, Brian J. $42,727.15

Siragusa, Lisa Serio $5,584.50

Sperano, Aaron J. $6,423.00

Spoto, David $1,050.00

Stacy, Michael P. $894.00

Stern, Jon M. $30,190.32

Stowe, Eric W. $34,573.73

Thomas-Diaz, Kathleen $25,150.50

Thompson, Donald M. $53,826.28

Page 45: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 43 -

Attorney Full Name Cost

Tuohey, Michael J. $2,529.39

Turner, Karen B. $62,468.25

Turner, Robert P. $20,245.50

Vacca, James P. $43,251.00

Vacca, Jr., Paul J. $34,623.75

Valleriani, Sam L. $21,464.25

Van Loon, Nathan Allen $24,135.00

Walsh, Jr., James E. $3,723.75

Watkins, Paul B. $1,305.00

Weisbeck, Kimberly W. $5,055.00

Welch, Jamie $4,968.16

Wisner, Todd J. $5,049.00

Wood, Robert W. $18,238.55

Young, D. Scott $33,870.00

Young, Mark A. $35,346.70

Youngman, Richard W. $8,746.03

Zimberlin, John F. $28,363.50

Zimmermann, Jr., Clark J. $16,022.88

Zunno, Harriet L. $423.75

Grand Total $3,229,500.21

Page 46: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 44 -

2011 By Type of Case Crime Description COST

Act Manor Injur Child < 17 $1,635.21

Adoption $480.00

Agg DWI with Child 1st $4,845.00

Agg. Harassment 2 $21,851.27

Agg. Unlicensed Operation 1 $16,638.96

Agg. Unlicensed Operation 2 $10,161.24

Agg. Unlicensed Operation 3 $4,566.91

Alcoholic Beverage Control $222.00

Appeal-Criminal Court (Fel.) $94,877.24

Appeal-Criminal Court (Misd.) $11,044.10

Appeal-Family Court $23,281.09

Arson 2 $10,394.67

Arson 2, Att. $3,750.00

Arson 3 $915.00

Arson 4 $2,475.00

Arson 5 $732.74

Article 78 proceeding $6,065.85

Assault 1 $25,560.00

Assault 2 $124,535.28

Assault 2, Att. $1,568.35

Assault 3 $47,220.83

Auto Strip 2 $150.00

Bribing a Witness $843.26

Page 47: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 45 -

Crime Description COST Burglary 1 $50,479.13

Burglary 2 $129,955.46

Burglary 2, Att. $15,887.20

Burglary 3 $58,569.91

Burglary 3, Att. $6,390.00

Child Protective Proceeding $276,969.28

Conspiracy 2 $47,890.85

CPFI 1 $8,633.68

CPFI 2 $11,445.88

CPFI 2, Att. $1,905.00

CPFI 3 $708.00

Crim. Obstruc Breath or Blood $2,328.00

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 2 $3,618.75

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 3 $172,297.43

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 4 $1,477.50

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 5 $2,867.80

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 7 $33,050.30

Crim. Poss. Marihuana 2 $4,575.00

Crim. Poss. Marihuana 3 $14,753.61

Crim. Poss. Marihuana 4 $4,748.40

Crim. Poss. Marihuana 5 $10,027.63

Crim. Poss. Stolen Property 2 $600.00

Crim. Poss. Stolen Property 3 $19,418.24

Crim. Poss. Stolen Property 4 $36,495.01

Page 48: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 46 -

Crime Description COST Crim. Poss. Stolen Property 5 $9,633.10

Crim. Poss. Weapon 2 $116,831.15

Crim. Poss. Weapon 3 $12,709.29

Crim. Poss. Weapon 4 $5,393.08

Crim. Sale Marihuana 4 $1,506.00

Crim. Sale Marihuana 5 $1,020.44

Crim. Sale of Controlled Substance 2 $4,252.19

Crim. Sale of Controlled Substance 3 $26,370.82

Crim. Trespass 2 $5,404.18

Crim. Trespass 3 $1,997.95

Crim. Use Drug Paraphernalia 2 $1,092.00

Criminal Contempt 1 $54,727.62

Criminal Contempt 1, Aggravated $15,142.90

Criminal Contempt 2 $30,120.03

Criminal Facilitation 4 $690.00

Criminal Impersonation 2 $1,890.59

Criminal Mischief 2 $1,792.50

Criminal Mischief 3 $19,210.90

Criminal Mischief 4 $30,534.98

Criminal Mischief 4, Att. $606.00

Criminal Nuisance 1 $2,482.50

Criminal Possession of Forgery Devices $405.00

Criminal Sexual Act 1 $11,310.33

Criminal Sexual Act 2 $8,062.50

Page 49: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 47 -

Crime Description COST Custody/Visitation $372,351.65

Disorderly Conduct $11,887.04

Driving While Ability Impaired $324.00

Driving While Intoxicated $11,144.38

Driving While Intoxicated (Fel.) $9,129.44

End. Welfare Child $9,536.50

Escape 2 $5,940.00

Escape 3 $444.00

Exposure of Person $78.00

Fail to Reg:Sex Off 2nd O $3,703.26

Fail to Reg:Sex Offender $892.50

False Personation $762.00

Falsely Reporting Incident 3 $1,240.76

Family Offense $50,608.69

File False Written Statement $558.00

Forcible Touching $3,501.00

Forgery 2 $14,077.00

Forgery 3 $258.00

Foster Care $14,247.28

Fugitive $399.44

Gang Assault 1 $21,368.69

Gang Assault 1, Att. $1,822.50

Gang Assault 2 $5,034.43

Grand Larceny 1 $3,317.50

Page 50: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 48 -

Crime Description COST Grand Larceny 3 $22,683.24

Grand Larceny 3, Att. $420.00

Grand Larceny 4 $48,511.24

Grand Larceny 4, Att. $474.00

Guardianship $6,223.01

Harassment $1,213.04

Harassment 2 $38,965.09

Hindering Prosecution 2 $1,987.50

Hindering Prosecution 3 $3,900.00

Identity Theft 1 $332.52

Identity Theft 2 $3,495.00

Inciting to Riot $432.00

Inhalation of Certain Toxic Vapors $660.00

Kidnapping 1 $22,935.00

Kidnapping 2 $3,822.40

Leaving Scene Incident-PI-F $3,220.65

Loitering $4,062.44

Loitering 1 $2,526.74

Menacing 2 $17,398.64

Murder 1, Att. $18,712.50

Murder 2 $144,310.69

Murder 2, Att. $15,896.81

Obstructing Govt'l Administration 2 $11,224.04

Parole Violation $18,874.08

Page 51: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 49 -

Crime Description COST Participate Animal Fight $645.00

Paternity $6,556.18

Petit Larceny $114,179.01

Petit Larceny, Att. $1,426.44

Pins-Intervenor/FC $2,598.54

Poss. Alcohol By Minor $114.45

Poss. Burglar's Tools $3,678.55

Post-Conviction Motion $20,720.33

Predatory Sexual Assault $12,934.50

Prohibited Use of Weapon $4,560.00

Promoting Prison Contraband 1 $1,860.00

Promoting Prison Contraband 2 $544.50

Promoting Prostitution 3 $6,652.50

Prostitution $1,152.00

Public Health Law $712.50

Public Lewdness $895.48

Rape 1 $9,796.41

Rape 1, Att. $4,069.03

Rape 2 $6,719.97

Reckless Driving $336.00

Reckless Endangerment 1 $14,251.87

Reckless Endangerment 2 $214.80

Resentence (F) $7,387.50

Resisting Arrest $9,853.32

Page 52: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 50 -

Crime Description COST Rioting 2 $2,666.40

Robbery 1 $150,509.53

Robbery 1, Att. $14,227.69

Robbery 2 $67,055.36

Robbery 2, Att. $2,760.00

Robbery 3 $18,041.25

Robbery 3, Att. $2,061.08

Sexual Abuse 1 $292.50

Sexual Abuse 3 $1,656.00

SORA $2,460.00

Stalking 4 $730.31

Support $8,931.54

Suspended Registration $1,166.99

Tampering Physical Evidence $1,800.00

Theft of Services $1,812.00

Torturing & Injuring Animals $866.16

Trespass $3,724.56

Unauthorized Use Motor Vehicle 2 $1,938.75

Unauthorized Use Motor Vehicle 3 $9,006.59

Unlawful Poss. Fire Arms MV $625.92

Unlawful Poss. Marihuana $1,742.50

Unlawfully Dealing With Child $636.00

Violation Probation (F) $38,065.61

Violation Probation (M) $33,099.59

Page 53: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 51 -

Crime Description COST Witness $4,876.20

Grand Total $3,229,500.21

Page 54: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 52 -

2011 Table of Program Use by Judiciary5 The table below shows the number of assignments for each Judge making at least

one assignment during 2011. The statistics, between this chart and the attorney assignments, clearly show that Rochester City Court, which assigns the greatest number of cases in the County, is very high in percentage of cases assigned through the Assigned Counsel Program. These facts directly correlate to the fact that the distribution of cases among the attorneys is greatest for criminal cases. Conversely, the statistics show that Family Court has a very low percentage of cases assigned through the Assigned Counsel Program when removing those cases assigned to the Conflict Defender Office.

Judge ACP Court Total

Affronti, Francis A. 1 14 15

Amarosa, Louis 1 0 1

Appellate Division, 8 45 53

Arcarese, Vincent 0 1 1

Argento, Victoria M. 3 49 52

Ark, John J. 2 2

Arnold, Jeanne 2 2

Arnold, Michael H. 3 6 9

Aronson, Stephen D. 1 1

Barone, Vincent M. 1 10 11

Beikirch, James F. 17 17

Bellini, Elma A. 1 1

Bernacki, John E. 6 6

5 The assignment numbers are higher here because unlike reporting of attorney assignments where only new assignments are reported, all assignments made by the Judges are counted here. These numbers include those cases handled by the Office of the Conflict Defender.

Page 55: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 53 -

Judge ACP Court Total

Boldt , Margaret M. 8 8

Brown-Steiner, Terrence 7 6 13

Campbell, Vincent 11 38 49

Castro, Melchor E. 80 18 98

Coapman, Carl A. 11 11

Connors, Robert P. 3 9 12

Constantino, Cynthia 2 2

Corretore, David 15 1 16

Crimi, Jr., Charles F. 80 21 101

DeMarco, John L. 6 28 34

Depferd, Mark R. 8 1 9

Dinolfo, Vincent M. 1 32 33

DiSalvo, Thomas J. 11 9 20

Dixon, Maija C. 72 39 111

Donofrio, Gail 1 160 161

Donsky, Steven M. 1 34 35

Doyle, Daniel J. 28 28

Elliott, John E. 110 35 145

Falk, John A. 7 7

Farber, Sidney T. 3 3

Fletcher, William P. 1 1

Gallagher, John 4 97 101

Gallaher, Patricia E. 33 33

Page 56: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 54 -

Judge ACP Court Total

Genier, Joseph T. 51 51

Geraci, Jr., Frank P. 25 18 43

Gordon, Julie Anne 42 46 88

Hammel, Allyn S. 4 3 7

Irizarry, Diana M. 8 1 9

Johnson, Teresa D. 147 12 159

Jones, Henry 13 13

Kasperek, Lawrence L. 1 1

Klonick, Thomas A 8 8

Kohout, Joan S. 6 118 124

Litteer, Jr., Harold H. 2 2

Lomenzo, Jr., John P. 8 3 11

Maley, Jr., James E. 4 4

Marks, Patricia D. 2 2

Miller, Stephen T. 647 217 864

Moffett, Richard W. 3 3

Morris, Karen 19 1 20

Morse, Thomas Rainbow 139 28 167

Mulley, James 5 3 8

Murante, David A. 2 2

Nesser, Joseph G. 37 37

Nitti, Gino M. 49 8 57

Odorisi, J. Scott 8 1 9

Page 57: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 55 -

Judge ACP Court Total

O’Keefe, Shannon 1 2 3

Olver, Melvin L. 5 7 12

Owlett, Deborah 8 1 9

Pericak, John G. 33 33

Piampiano, James J. 24 27 51

Pietropaoli, Patrick 1 7 8

Pilato, Linda Lohner 3 3

Pisaturo, John J. 37 8 45

Polito, Thomas W. 33 14 47

Proano, Galo 3 3

Pupatelli, Peter P. 4 31 35

Rao, Michael G. 10 1 11

Rath, Paul W. 3 3

Redfield, Christine 4 1 5

Renzi, Alexander 11 178 189

Riordan, Paul M. 21 11 32

Rivoli, John J. 2 2

Romeo, Stacey 3 2 5

Ruhlmann, Dandrea L. 1 127 128

Russi, Patrick 14 14

Schiano, Jr., Charles A. 35 41 76

Schiano, Michael Patrick 3 3

Schwartz, John R. 6 8 14

Page 58: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 56 -

Judge ACP Court Total

Sciortino, Michael A. 5 3 8

Smith, Jr., William A. 3 2 5

Stowe, Richard E. 1 7 8

Valentino, Joseph D. 10 10 20

Valentino, Joseph J. 49 49

Wilcox, Christopher T. 1 1

Winslow, Joanne M. 1 1

Yacknin, Ellen M. 100 17 117

Grand Total 1930 1901 3831

2011 Case Cost Judiciary

Judges COST

Affronti, Francis A. $59,764.72

Amarosa, Louis $391.55

Anderson, Paula $1,621.76

Appellate Division, $118,158.33

Arcarese, Vincent $4,632.29

Argento, Victoria M. $34,879.26

Ark, John J. $232.50

Arnold, Jeanne $712.50

Arnold, Michael H. $22,949.82

Barone, Vincent M. $2,623.94

Page 59: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 57 -

Judges COST

Beikirch, James F. $2,889.53

Bellini, Elma A. $33,592.58

Bernacki, John E. $2,034.03

Boldt , Margaret M. $1,091.37

Brown-Steiner, Terrence $2,536.80

Campbell, Vincent $34,178.41

Castro, Melchor E. $46,346.92

Coapman, Carl A. $2,194.50

Connell, John J. $15,960.00

Connors, Robert P. $7,075.94

Constantino, Cynthia $1,350.00

Corretore, David $14,788.50

Crimi, Jr., Charles F. $36,881.93

DeMarco, John L. $43,191.72

Depferd, Mark R. $4,876.50

Dinolfo, Vincent M. $26,700.06

DiSalvo, Thomas J. $11,507.04

Dixon, Maija C. $51,653.80

Dollinger, Richard A. $132.00

Donofrio, Gail $84,402.63

Donsky, Steven M. $20,715.22

Doyle, Daniel J. $62,599.52

Egan, David D. $60,859.84

Page 60: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 58 -

Judges COST

Elliott, John E. $34,180.08

Falk, John A. $10,890.75

Farber, Sidney T. $4,267.50

Fletcher, William P. $386.25

Frazee, Evelyn $712.50

Gallagher, John $29,267.45

Gallaher, Patricia E. $71,643.13

Gallina, Fred S. $3,913.50

Genier, Joseph T. $25,414.78

Geraci, Jr., Frank P. $29,611.26

Gordon, Julie Anne $62,713.10

Hammel, Allyn S. $4,697.56

Irizarry, Diana M. $3,920.69

Johnson, Teresa D. $37,244.71

Jones, Henry $5,594.67

Kasperek, Lawrence L. $324.00

Keenan, Richard A. $14,775.60

Klonick, Thomas A $6,689.84

Kohout, Joan S. $112,199.15

Litteer, Jr., Harold H. $14,142.38

Lomenzo, Jr., John P. $26,271.27

Maley, Jr., James E. $975.00

Marks, Patricia D. $65,096.50

Page 61: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 59 -

Judges COST

McCaarthy, Brian M. $21,817.50

Miller, Stephen T. $945,273.07

Moffett, Richard W. $3,556.46

Morris, Karen $19,026.00

Morse, Thomas Rainbow $51,881.09

Mulley, James $7,030.12

Murante, David A. $5,575.44

Nesser, Joseph G. $41,776.69

Nitti, Gino M. $33,432.16

Odorisi, J. Scott $2,110.27

O’Keefe, Shannon $285.00

Olver, Melvin L. $5,488.77

Owlett, Deborah $1,666.32

Pericak, John G. $9,931.95

Piampiano, James J. $34,122.10

Pietropaoli, Patrick $10,087.12

Pilato, Linda Lohner $637.50

Pisaturo, John J. $35,071.58

Polito, Thomas W. $42,417.74

Proano, Galo $1,471.19

Pupatelli, Peter P. $25,410.40

Rao, Michael G. $1,646.25

Rath, Paul W. $1,470.00

Page 62: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 60 -

Judges COST

Redfield, Christine $2,940.00

Renzi, Alexander $66,373.95

Riordan, Paul M. $8,412.73

Rivoli, John J. $34,618.81

Romeo, Stacey $900.00

Ruhlmann, Dandrea L. $137,341.16

Russi, Patrick $912.00

Schiano, Jr., Charles A. $53,514.23

Schiano, Michael Patrick $8,595.30

Schwartz, John R. $17,953.46

Sciortino, Michael A. $18,640.58

Smith, Jr., William A. $474.00

Stowe, Richard E. $1,887.00

Valentino, Joseph D. $96,515.42

Valentino, Joseph J. $33,329.32

Wiggins, Robert B. $3,225.00

Wolford, Kelly C. $25,710.40

Yacknin, Ellen M. $38,514.95

Grand Total $3,229,500.21

Page 63: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 61 -

Types of Cases Referred in 20116

Crime Total Act Manor Injur Child < 17 2

Adoption 1

Agg DWI with Child 1st 2

Agg. Harassment 2 57

Agg. Unlicensed Operation 1 26

Agg. Unlicensed Operation 2 25

Agg. Unlicensed Operation 3 11

Alcoholic Beverage Control 2

Appeal-Criminal Court (Fel.) 19

Appeal-Criminal Court (Misd.) 3

Appeal-Family Court 5

Arson 2 3

Arson 2, Att. 1

Arson 3 1

Arson 4 1

Arson 5 1

Article 78 proceeding 1

Assault 1 8

6 Based only on cases referred to ACP (not including CDO) for assignment. Assignment numbers may vary for a variety of reasons.

Page 64: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 62 -

Crime Total Assault 2 86

Assault 2, Att. 4

Assault 3 71

Auto Strip 2 1

Bribing a Witness 1

Burglary 1 12

Burglary 2 92

Burglary 2, Att. 13

Burglary 3 64

Burglary 3, Att. 1

Child Protective Proceeding 125

Conspiracy 2 16

CPFI 1 5

CPFI 2 11

CPFI 2, Att. 1

CPFI 3 1

Crim. Obstruc Breath or Blood 5

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 2 6

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 3 149

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 4 3

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 5 6

Crim. Poss. Controlled Substance 7 53

Crim. Poss. Marihuana 2 8

Crim. Poss. Marihuana 3 8

Page 65: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 63 -

Crime Total Crim. Poss. Marihuana 4 7

Crim. Poss. Marihuana 5 17

Crim. Poss. Stolen Property 2 1

Crim. Poss. Stolen Property 3 9

Crim. Poss. Stolen Property 4 41

Crim. Poss. Stolen Property 5 19

Crim. Poss. Weapon 2 63

Crim. Poss. Weapon 3 16

Crim. Poss. Weapon 4 9

Crim. Sale Marihuana 4 3

Crim. Sale Marihuana 5 2

Crim. Sale of Controlled Substance 2 2

Crim. Sale of Controlled Substance 3 17

Crim. Trespass 2 14

Crim. Trespass 3 7

Crim. Use Drug Paraphernalia 2 2

Criminal Contempt 1 80

Criminal Contempt 1, Aggravated 13

Criminal Contempt 2 67

Criminal Facilitation 4 1

Criminal Impersonation 2 4

Criminal Mischief 2 2

Criminal Mischief 3 21

Criminal Mischief 4 69

Page 66: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 64 -

Crime Total Criminal Mischief 4, Att. 1

Criminal Nuisance 2 1

Criminal Possession of Forgery Devices 1

Criminal Sexual Act 1 3

Criminal Sexual Act 2 1

Custody/Visitation 408

Disorderly Conduct 47

Driving While Ability Impaired 1

Driving While Intoxicated 13

Driving While Intoxicated (Fel.) 9

End. Welfare Child 15

Escape 2 1

Escape 3 1

Exposure of Person 1

Fail to Reg:Sex Off 2nd O 3

Fail to Reg:Sex Offender 1

False Personation 3

Falsely Reporting Incident 3 2

Family Offense 117

File False Written Statement 1

Forcible Touching 2

Forgery 2 13

Forgery 3 1

Foster Care 7

Page 67: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 65 -

Crime Total Fugitive 2

Gang Assault 1 6

Gang Assault 1, Att. 1

Gang Assault 2 5

Grand Larceny 1 1

Grand Larceny 3 12

Grand Larceny 3, Att. 1

Grand Larceny 4 45

Grand Larceny 4, Att. 2

Guardianship 7

Harassment 3

Harassment 2 139

Hindering Prosecution 2 1

Hindering Prosecution 3 4

Identity Theft 1 1

Identity Theft 2 3

Inciting to Riot 1

Inhalation of Certain Toxic Vapors 1

Kidnapping 1 4

Kidnapping 2 3

Leaving Scene Incident-PI-F 2

Loitering 13

Loitering 1 8

Menacing 2 33

Page 68: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 66 -

Crime Total Murder 1, Att. 1

Murder 2 19

Murder 2, Att. 3

Obstructing Govt'l Administration 2 20

Parole Violation 42

Participate Animal Fight 1

Paternity 22

Petit Larceny 233

Petit Larceny, Att. 3

Pins-Intervenor/FC 5

Poss. Alcohol By Minor 1

Poss. Burglar's Tools 4

Post-Conviction Motion 4

Predatory Sexual Assault 4

Prohibited Use of Weapon 8

Promoting Prison Contraband 1 1

Promoting Prison Contraband 2 2

Promoting Prostitution 3 1

Prostitution 3

Public Health Law 1

Public Lewdness 3

Rape 1 4

Rape 1, Att. 2

Rape 2 2

Page 69: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 67 -

Crime Total Reckless Driving 1

Reckless Endangerment 1 11

Reckless Endangerment 2 1

Resentence (F) 10

Resisting Arrest 22

Rioting 2 4

Robbery 1 65

Robbery 1, Att. 8

Robbery 2 45

Robbery 2, Att. 2

Robbery 3 10

Robbery 3, Att. 3

Sexual Abuse 1 1

Sexual Abuse 3 1

SORA 2

Stalking 4 1

Support 21

Suspended Registration 2

Tampering Physical Evidence 3

Theft of Services 4

Torturing & Injuring Animals 1

Trespass 18

Unauthorized Use Motor Vehicle 2 2

Unauthorized Use Motor Vehicle 3 18

Page 70: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 68 -

Crime Total Unlawful Poss. Fire Arms MV 1

Unlawful Poss. Marihuana 12

Unlawfully Dealing With Child 1

Violation Probation (F) 53

Violation Probation (M) 69

Witness 14

Grand Total 3143

2011 Case Dispositions7 Disposition Total Abated by Death 2

ACD 734

Admit Petition 167

Appeal Judgment - Affirmed 27

Appeal Judgment - Discontinued 3

Appeal Judgment - Dismissed 1

Appeal Judgment – Modified 2

Appeal Judgment - Reversed 2

Appeal Sentence - Modified 2

Bench Trial - Acquittal 21

7 Includes all cases closed and paid in 2011 even if assigned in prior year.

Page 71: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 69 -

Bench Trial - Guilty Lesser 5

Bench Trial - Guilty Original 7

Bench Warrant 38

Client Retained Own Counsel 95

Conflict of Interest 10

Consolidated - Other Charges 6

Covered by Plea - Other Charge 203

Dismissed - CPL 30.30 370

Dismissed - Felony Complaint 6

Dismissed - Indictment 17

Dismissed - Information 280

Dismissed – Plea in Satisfaction 45

Extradition Granted 2

Incompetent to Stand Trial 3

Jury Trial - Acquittal 8

Jury Trial - Guilty Lesser 8

Jury Trial - Guilty Original 16

No Bill – Grand Jury 141

No Conflict - PD Continued 31

Not Indigent 4

Other 21

Petition Dismissed 869

Petition found after hearing 24

Plea to Reduced Charge 774

Plea to Top Charge 376

Page 72: Monroe County Final Draft Report.pdf · assignment system for conflict cases arising in the courts specified in Article IV herein; to provide a more equitable distribution of conflict

- 70 -

Post-Conviction Denied 3

Pre-Trial Diversion 1

Relieved by Court 58

Stipulated Settlement 1010

Transfer to Family Court 5

Transfer to IDV 61

Trial Order of Dismissal 4

YO Adjudication 64

Grand Total 5526