_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ , _ Jcnucry 13, 1977, ,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICANUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board.

In the Matter of ))

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and )

[346A).

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) Docket No.COMPANY )

^

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, )Unit 1) )

)THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )

COMPANY, ET AL. ) Docket Nos. FH A'(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, ) 50-441A

Units 1 and 2) ))

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. )(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, ) Docket Nos. 50-500A

Units 2 and 3) ) 50-501A

MOTION FOR AN EXTEN!3 ION OF TIME TOFILE EXCEPTIONS AND BRIEFS IN SUPPORT THEREOF

/-/3-771. On January 6, 1977 the Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board (" Licensing Board") rendered its Initial

Decision in the above-captioned antitrust proceeding. Pur-

suant to Section 2.711 of the Commission's Rules of Practice

(10 C.F.R. S 2.711), Applicants hereby move the Atomic Safety

and Licensing Appeal Board (" Appeal Board") to extend the

time within which to file exceptions and briefs in support

thereof. Applicants regret having to file this motion on the

last day contemplated by the rules (see 10 C.F.R. S 2.762),

but we had been endeavoring to reach agreement on a schedule

mutually satisfactory to all parties. In fact, the parties

002 2 1/1940 o l/ us -

- . , - - -

. _,

-2--

were very close to agreement on such a joint schedule and

it was not until yesterday that Applicants first learned

that it would not be possible to reach agreement.

2. Applicants request the Appeal Board to set

the following schedule which is essentially the same schedule

agreed to by the parties and approved by the Appeal Board

in the Consumers antitrust proceeding -(see Consumers Power

Company (Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2), ALAB-282, 2 N.R.C. 9

(1975)):

Exceptions To The Initial Decision - February 28, 1977

Briefs In Support Of Exceptions - April 29, 1977

Answering Briefs - June 28, 1977

Reply Briefs - July 19, 1977

3. This request is made in view of the length of

the Initial Decision (264 pages), the length and complexity

of the record (12,836 transcript pages and 1331 documentary

exhibits), and the multiplicity of parties involved. The

proceedings in this consolidated docket have been as protracted

as those in.the Consumers proceeding, and the record compiled

here is even more lengthy. Applicants need a fair opportunity

to evaluate the factual findings and legal conclusions and

to brief the many issues contained in tha Licensing Board's

Initial Decision. i

l

l

11

_ _ _ . - _

. . ...

-3- I

WHEREFORE, Applicants request the Appeal Board

to grant their motion to extend the time within which to

file exceptions and briefs in support thereof.

Respectfully submitted,

SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE

c , %By: C ~hi Nd wC-

Wm. Bradford Reynblds N

Counsel for Applicants

Dated: January 13, 1977.

.

6

v - - .. . - , . - .

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ .

. - . -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICANUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board

In the Matter of ))

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and )THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) Docket No. 50-346A

COMPANY )(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, )

Unit 1) ))

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )COMPANY, ET AL. ) Docket Nos. 50-440A

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, ) 50-441AUnits 1 and 2) )

)THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANI, ET AL. )(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, ) Docket Nos. 50-500A

Units 2 and 3) ) 50-501A

CERTITTCATE CF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing

" Motion For An Extension Of Time To File Exceptions And

Briefs In Support Thereof" were served upon each of the

persons listed on the attached Service List, by hand de-

livering copies to those persons in the Washington, D.C. j

area, and by mailing copies, postage prepaid, to all others,

all on this 13th day of January, 1977.

"SHAW , PITTMAN, POTTS & 'IROWBRIDGE

7i sBy: ( j m. OdLJ \ C_~_A

Wm. Bradford Reynolds \Counsel for Applicants

|

|

__

_ .__ _ _ _ . _ _ - - _ _ _ _

..e .

UNITED STATES OF AMERICANUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board

.

In the Matter of ))

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and )THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) Docket No. 50-346A

COMPANY )(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, )

Unit 1) ))

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )COMPANY, ET AL. ) Docket Nos. 50-440A

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, ) 50-441AUnits 1 and 2) )

)THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. )(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, ) Docket Nos. 50-500A

Units 2 and 3) ) 50-501A

SERVICE LIST

Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq. Ivan W. Smith, Esq.Chairman, Atomic Safety and Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555Washington, D. C. 20555

John M. F2Fsiak, Esq.,

Jerome E. Sharfman, Esq. Atomic Safety and Licensing BoardAtomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Appeal Board Washinoton, D. C. 20555U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D. C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing

Board PanelRichard S. Salzman, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAtomic Safety and Licensing Washington, D. C. 20555

Appeal BoardU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docketing & Service SectionWashington, D. C. 20555 office of the Secretary

' U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAtomic Safety and Licensing ashington, D. C. 20006

,

Appeal Board PanelU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Joseph Rutberg, Esq.Washington, D. C. 20555 Benjamin H. Vogler, Esq.

Douglas V. Rigler, Esq. Roy P._Lessy, Jr., Esq.Office of the Executive

,

Chairman, Atomic Safety andLicensing Board Legal Director

,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFoley, Lardner, Hollabaugh and Jacobs~Chanin Building - Suite 206 Washington, D. C. 2055a815 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington, D. C. 20006

m . _

. .-. . - - . .

.

.. , .

-2-

Jcseph J. Saunders, Esq. Terence H. Benbow, Esq.Antitrust Division A. Edward Grashof, Esq.Department of Justice Steven A. Berger, Esq.Washington, D. C. 20530 Steven B. Peri, Esq.

Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & RobertsM0lvin G. Berger, Esq. 40 Wall StreetJcnet R. Urban, Esq. New York, New York 10005Antitrust DivisionP. O. Box 7513 Thomas J. Munsch, Esq.W2shington, D. C. 20044 General Attorney

Duquesne Light CcmpanyR uben Goldberg, Esq. 435 Sixth Avenue"

D vid C. Hjelmfelt,. Esq. Pittsburgh, PA 15219Michael D. Oldak, Esq.Goldberg, Fieldman & Hjelmfelt David McNeil Olds, Esq.Suite ~550 Reed Smith Shaw & McClay1700 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Union Trust BuildingWashington, D. C. 20006 Box 2009

Pittsburgh, PA 15230Vincent C. Campanella, Esq.

Director of Law Lee A. Rau, Esq.,

Robert D. Hart, Esq. Joseph A. Rieser, Jr., Esq.1st Ass't Director of Law Reed Smith Shaw & McClay

City of Cleveland Suite 900213 City Hall 1150 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Washington, D. C. 20036

Frank R. Clokey, Esq. James R. Edgerly, Esq.

1 Special Ass't Attorney General Secretary and General Counsel; Room,219 Pennsylvania Power Company

| Towne House Apartments One East Washington StreetHarrisburg, PA 17105 New Castle, PA 16103

Donald H. Hauser, Esq. John Lansdale, Esq.Victor F. Greenslade, Jr., Esq. Cox, Langford & BrownWilliam J. Kerner, Esq. 21 Dupont Circle, N.W.The Cleveland Electric Washington, D. C. 20036

Illuminating Company ,

Alan P. Buchmann, Esq.55 Public SquareCleveland, Ohio 44101 Squire, Sanders & Dempsey

1800 Union Commerce Building

Michael M. Briley, Esq. Cleveland, Ohio 44115'

' Edward A. Matto, Esq.F e , H n y, ge & Snyder

Richard M. Firestone, Esq.P. O. Box 2088

Karen H. Adkins, Esq.Toledo, Ohio 43603Antitrust Section

Russell J. Spetrino, Esq. 30 E. Broad Street, 15th FloorThomas A. Kayuha, Esq. Columbus, Ohio.43215Ohio Edison Company Christopher R. Schraff, Esq.47 North Main Street Assistant Attorney GeneralAkron,-Ohio 44308 Environmental Law Section

361 E. Broad Street, 8th FloorColumbus, Ohio 43215

- . .-.- - - - - -