21
Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly Presented by: Christos A Ioannou University of Minnesota Diamond is the only appropriate gem to symbolize lifetime love and commitment The company spends $180 million a year worldwide to advertise cut diamonds - a product it doesn't even sell ...

Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Presented by:Christos A Ioannou University of Minnesota

Diamond is the only appropriate gem to symbolize lifetime love and commitment

The company spends $180 million a year worldwide to advertise cut diamonds - a product it doesn't even sell ...

Page 2: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

What is De Beers?

arbiter of the prices

not retailer

not manufacturer

BUT

miner and buyer of 70% of the world's

rough diamonds

DE BEERS

CUTTERS

JEWELERS

Page 3: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Rough Diamonds

Cut Diamonds

Page 4: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Jewelry Stores

OutlineOrigin

How it achieved its market powerHow it has managed to control the market

How the Monopoly operatesConflict Diamonds Moving Away From the Monopoly

Antitrust LawsTechnological AdvancesLev Leviev

Page 5: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Facts about De Beers

Most successful monopoly of modern trade

Other commodity prices (e.g. gold, silver) fluctuate greatly in response to economic conditions

Diamonds’ prices are constantly rising

20th century, De Beers sold 85% to 90% of the diamonds mined worldwide

Rockefeller's Standard Oil

Gates' Microsoft

Page 6: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

De Beers is a typical example of monopoly!!!

It is almost the sole seller of diamonds

Sells a commodity with no close substitutes(created this illusion by advertising)

It restricts output and it responds to changes in market demand

Are diamonds rare?

Page 7: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Before the 19th century:

Diamonds were exceptionally rare

Small quantities in India and Brazil

No diamond mines were discovered

Nowadays:

Many diamond mines:

Republic of South Africa

Sub-Saharan countries

SiberiaAustraliaCanada

Origin

1869

First diamond mines in the colonies of southern Africa

Drastically increased the number of stones available

1870Many diamond hunters bought mines

Page 8: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Cecil Rhodes

Bought the rights to two mines on the farm of :

Nicolas

and

Diedrick De Beer

in the Cape Colony (now South Africa).

Diamond hunters realized that scarcity increases diamond prices.

Had no other alternative than to merge their interests into a single entity:

control the mines’ production

keep the scarcity illusion

Page 9: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

De Beers Consolidated Mines Limited

Established 12th March 1888

Rhodes, founding chairman

De Beers:

South African company

By 1890, De Beers controlled 95% of the world’s diamond production

Page 10: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

DE BEERS

CUTTERS

JEWELERS

DE BEERS

?

CUTTERS

JEWELERS

Page 11: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Wholesalers

Group of 10 merchants

(London Diamond Syndicate)

Agree to be purchasing the entire production from all the De Beers mines

Resell the diamonds to cutters

DE BEERS

SYNDICATE

CUTTERS

JEWELERS

Page 12: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Ernest Oppenheimer

Oppenheimer family still controls De Beers

Started buying his own mines(Consolidated Diamond Mines)

Started competing with De Beers

Took over De Beers

Chairman in 1929

His thinking was:

“The only way to increase the value of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production”

Page 13: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Example: Great Depression

Oppenheimer realized that:

Prices will fall

People will lose faith in diamonds

Public stopped buying diamonds (demand shifted left)

London Diamond Syndicate could not absorb the world’s diamond production at the high prices

Huge Stockpiles

Wanted to put them in the market

DE BEERS

CUTTERS

JEWELERS

Page 14: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Took over the Syndicate

Sell the diamonds to a selected group of cutters that abide De Beers rules.

To eliminate excess supply closed all major mines in South Africa

Year Production (carats)1930 2,242,0001933 14,000

Page 15: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

De Beers’ Stockpile……

By 1937 De Beers stockpile of diamonds had grown to………..

40 million carats (20 years supply) !!!

How the Monopoly Functions

“Supplier of Choice” Systemsends invitations to 120 chosen clients (diamond cutting factories in NY, Tel Aviv, Antwerp) to attend the 10 annual “sights”

client receives a small box:uncut diamonds price of the box ($1-$25 million)

Page 16: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Rules of the Game

Rule #1DTC decides who gets which box

Rule #2No Haggling over price (price maker)

Rule #3Take the entire Box or None

Rule #4No client may resell the diamonds in his box in their uncut form

RemarkIsraeli Dealers (1977)

Page 17: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Rule #5Clients will provide any information to evaluate the diamond market

Before the sight, clients fill out a detailed questionnaire

number of uncut diamonds in inventorydiamonds in process to cutfuture sales

De Beers audits their cutting factories in surprised visits

Thus, De Beers decides:

How many diamonds of each quality will be distributed in total

How this supply will be divided among the clients

Price of diamonds

Page 18: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

What determines their decisions?

Demand

Information about rate of family formation in USA and Japan

Economic conditions

SupplyQuestionnaires

Supplier of Choice aims to stimulate growth in

diamond demand and close this opportunity gap.

Page 19: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Conflict Diamonds

Angolan Adventure

18-year civil war

Began as a struggle against the Portuguese occupation

Escalated to the country's natural resources

De Beers buys lots of diamonds from areas controlled by rebels.

Rebels used the money to finance the war

By 1994, De Beers' Angolan adventure threatened to become a PR nightmare

Fearful of a consumer backlash, De Beers closed its buying offices in Angola and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

Page 20: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Kimberley Process Certification Scheme

The KPCS is a joint governmental, international, and civil society initiative to stem the flow of conflict diamonds

Certifies that shipments of rough diamonds are free from conflict

Was decreed in 2000 at Kimberley

So far 45 participants

Moving AwayAntitrust Laws

In 2004 De Beers paid $10 million fine for price fixing

As part of the class action settlement, De Beers promised to comply with the US antitrust laws

In February 2006, De Beers entered similar agreement with EU

Page 21: Moving Away From The De Beers Monopoly

Moving AwayTechnological Advances

We can manufacture diamonds (carbon, heat and high pressures)

The cost has been going down

Apollo is a publicly funded R & D establishment

Moving AwayLev Leviev

Worth is $2 billion

Expressed interest in entering the diamond industry

Healthy competition will lead to a correction in the prices of diamonds