Upload
adri-hdzpedraza
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
1/68
Mass Spec - FragmentationAn extremely useful result of EI ionization in particular is a
phenomenon known asfragmentation.
The radical cation that is produced when an electron is knocked out
of a neutral closed-shell molecule in EIMS initially possesses a lot of
energy.
Energy sufficient to break chemical bonds: radical cation will usuallybreak into a neutral radical and a cation. It is also possible for a
neutral closed shell fragment (such as water) to fall off.
CH3 OH CH3 OH
+
CH3
OH+
CH3
OH+
CH2 OH+ H
CH3
OH
+ 1 electron 2 electrons+
+
++
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
2/68
Predicting Fragmentation
A considerable volume of literature regarding the
fragmentation reactions of certain molecules is available.
Using this knowledge, we can predict how a given molecule
might fragment.
But first a few conventions.
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
3/68
Conventions
It is always best to localize the cation and radical, obeying the
rules of Lewis structures (i.e. dont put more than 8electrons on carbon).
For example, for the three structures above, A is discouraged
in favour of B or C. This convention is not always possible
to obey (alkanes).
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
4/68
More on Conventions
When a molecule is ionized by EIMS, must decide which
electron to remove. Always best to remove an electron from
a -bond, or from aheteroatom lone pair. It will become
more clear which is the better choice when we look at
individual examples.
The bond breaking can be done either byhomolytic or
heterolytic cleavage.H3C CH2 O R
EI
CH3 CH2 O R+
CH3 H2C O R++
H3C CH2 Br
EI
CH3 CH2 Br+
CH3 CH2+ + Br
Homolytic Heterolytic
1 e
2 e
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
5/68
Fragmentation Notes
- Most fragments are even-electron cations. These split to
make more even-electron cations.
- The probability of cleaving a given bond is related to the
bond strength, and to the stability of the fragments formed.
In particular, cations like to rearrange or decay into more
stable cations.
- Remember that for a ring system, at least 2 bonds must
break for the ring to fragment.
In addition, there are 10 general rules to keep in mind when
predicting the most likely ions to be formed for a given
molecule.
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
6/68
Fragmentation Guidelines
1. The relative height of the M+ peak is greatest for straight-
chain molecules and decreases as the branching increases.
2. The relative height of the M+ peak decreases with chain lengthfor a homologous series.
3. Cleavage is favoured at alkyl-substituted carbons, with the
probability of cleavage increasing as the substitution increases.These rules mostly arise from the fact that carbocation and radical
stability show the following trend:
Most Stable Benzylic > Allylic > Tertiary > Secondary >> Primary Least Stable
Stevensons Rule
At the point of breakage, the larger fragment usually takes the
radical to leave the smaller cation.
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
7/68
Fragmentation Guidelines
4. Double bonds, cyclic structures, and especially aromatic rings
will stabilize the molecular ion and increase its probability of
appearance.5. Double bonds favor allylic cleavage to give a resonance
stabilized allylic carbocation, especially for cycloalkenes.
6. For saturated rings (like cyclohexanes), the side chains tend
to cleave first leaving the positive charge with the ring.
R+
+ + R
EI + +
+
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
8/68
Fragmentation Guidelines
7. Unsaturated rings can also undergoretro-Diels-Alder
reactions to eliminate a neutral alkene.
8. Aromatic compounds tend to cleave to give benzylic cations,
or more likely tropylium cations.
EI + ++
+
R
EI
R +
+
+
m/z 91
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
9/68
Fragmentation Guidelines
9. C-C bonds next to heteroatoms often break leaving the
positive charge on the carbon with the heteroatom.
10. Cleavage is often favoured if it can expelsmall stablemolecules like water, CO, NH3, H2S, etc.
In addition to bond fragmentation, various intramolecular
rearrangements can take place to give sometimes unexpected
ions.
O+
O+
+O
+
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
10/68
Rearrangements
One common type of rearrangement in MS is theMcLafferty
rearrangement which takes place in compounds that
contain a carbonyl group.
Many other rearrangements are possible, even some that are
not well understood and are considered random.
O
Y
H+
OH+
+
H3C
CH3
CH3
CH3
+
CH3CH2+
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
11/68
Chem 325
Mass Spectra
of
Various Classes
of
Organic Compounds
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
12/68
1. Saturated HydrocarbonsGeneral rules 1-3 apply well to hydrocarbons.
Rearrangements are common but usually do not give
intense peaks.
The M+ peak of a straight-chain hydrocarbon is always visible,
but decreases in intensity as the molecule gets larger. The
fragmentation pattern is characterized by peaks separated
by 14 mass units (a CH2 group). The most intense peaks are
the C3 C5 fragments.
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
13/68
Branched HydrocarbonsThe MS for branched saturated hydrocarbons are similar,
except certain fragments become more prominent.
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
14/68
CI-MS
For some types of compounds the M+ peak is very weak or
not observable at all!
Due to EI ionization being a hard ionization: so much
internal energy is given to the molecular ion that extensive
fragmentation immediately results.
How to measure the molecular mass??
Chemical Ionization (CI).
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
15/68
Chemical Ionization
Ion source filled with relatively high pressure reagent gas,
example isobutane i-C4H10, ammonia, or methane CH4
Electron impact ionizes the CH4, high pressure ensuresmany ion-molecule collisions and reactions to produce
CH5+, which acts as aprotonating agent when it collides
with sample molecule M
e CH4 CH5+
CH5+ + M MH+ + CH4
(M+C2H
5)+, (M+C
3H
5)+
Can also use i-C4H10, NH3, etc.
soft ionization: much less fragmentation, can see molecular ion
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
16/68
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
17/68
Cyclic Hydrocarbons
Cyclic hydrocarbons show a much more intense M+ ion (Rule 4)
Two bonds must break to form fragments.
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
18/68
2. Alkenes
It is usually easy to see the M+ peak of alkenes in EIMS.
In acyclic alkenes, the double bond freely migrates in the
fragments, so it can be difficult to determine the doublebond location, but for cyclic alkenes it is easier.
Cleavage usually happens at allylic bonds (Rule 5).
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
19/68
3. Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Aromatic hydrocarbons usually show strong M+ peaks (Rule 4).
Aromatic rings are stable and have a lower tendency to
fragment.
Alkyl substituted benzenes often give a strong peak at m/z 91
due to benzylic cleavage (Rule 8).
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
20/68
MS of n-butylbenzene
+
+
+
+
m/z 91
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
21/68
4. Alcohols
Alcohols fragment very easily secondary and primary alcohols show
very weak M+ peaks, and tertiary alcohols often do not show M+ at
all. MW is often determined by derivatization or CI-MS.
The C-C bond nearest the OH is frequently the first bond to break.
Thus primary alcohols often show a prominent peak at 31 m/z.
OH+ OH OH++
m/z = 60 m/z = 31
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
22/68
Secondary Alcohols
Secondary alcohols cleave in the same way, often showing a
prominent +CHR-OH peak.
OH+
m/z = 74
OH
+
m/z = 45
OH+
OH
+
m/z = 74 m/z = 59
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
23/68
Alcohols
Sometimes the hydrogen R2CH-OH in 1 and 2 alcohols
cleaves rather than an alkyl group. The result is an M-1
peak.
H
OH+
OH
+
M+m/z = 74 M-1m/z = 73
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
24/68
Tertiary Alcohols
Tertiary alcohols cleave in a similar fashion to give +CRR-OH
fragments.
OH+
A B
OH
+
m/z = 116 (not observed)
OH
+
A B
m/z = 101m/z = 59
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
25/68
More on Alcohols
Alcohols can lose a molecule of water to show a sometimes
prominent M-18 peak. It is especially noticeable for
primary alcohols.
O
H
+
H
HO
H+
+
M+m/z = 102 M-18m/z = 84
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
26/68
Benzylic Alcohols
Benzylic alcohols fragment much differently from aliphatic
alcohols. Benzylic cleavage happens as expected (Rule 8).
Benzyl alcohol fragments via the following pathway:
OH
+
OH
+-H -CO
H H
+ H
H
H
H
H+
m/z = 108 m/z = 107 m/z = 79 m/z = 77
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
27/68
Benzylic Alcohols
Benzylic alcohols will usually lose water (M-18). The M-18
peak is especially strong for molecules for which loss of water
is mechanistically straightforward.
H
O
H
+ +
m/z = 122 m/z = 104
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
28/68
Phenols
Phenols often show peaks at 77 m/z resulting from formation
of phenyl cation, and peaks resulting from loss of CO (M-28)
and CHO (M-29) are usually found in phenols.
OH
94
M-28
M-29
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
29/68
Phenols
If alternative attractive cleavage pathways are available for
phenols, the molecule will often take that path.
Molecular ions will fragment along the path of least
resistance!
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
30/68
Example: Octane
m/z = 114
*
*
*
* *
*
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
31/68
Example: 4-methyl-2-hexene
m/z = 98
*
**
*
*
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
32/68
Example: 3-methyl-1-pentanol
OH
m/z = 102
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
33/68
Example: 4-methyl-2-pentanol
OH
m/z = 102
*
*
*
*
**
*
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
34/68
Example: 2-phenylethanol
OH
m/z = 122
*
*
* * *
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
35/68
Example: 1-phenylethanol
m/z = 122
OH
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
36/68
5. Ethers
Cleavage happens in two main ways:
1. Breakage of the C-C bond next to O (like alcohols)
OCH3
m/z = 88
A B
A
OCH3
+ +
m/z = 73
OCH3
+or
+
B
m/z = 59 m/z = 29
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
37/68
Ethers
Cleavage happens in two main ways:
2. C-O bond cleavage with the charge on the C fragment.
OCH3+
O CH3+
m/z = 57m/z = 88
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
38/68
Aromatic Ethers
M+ is usually strong. MS is similar to phenols both form
phenoxyl cation (m/z 93) and associated daughters.
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
39/68
6. Ketones
Ketones usually give strong M+ peaks. A major fragmentation
pathway involves -cleavage to give anacylium ion.
O
A B
A
B
O
O
+ +
+
m/z = 57
m/z = 71
m/z = 100
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
40/68
6. Ketones
The carbonyl-containing fragment can also take the radical.
O
A B
A
B
O
O
+
+
m/z = 43
m/z = 100
+
m/z = 29
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
41/68
6. Ketones
For ketones with longer chains, the McLafferty
rearrangement often leads to strong peaks.
O
H+
m/z = 128
OH+
m/z = 58
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
42/68
6. Aromatic Ketones
M+ is evident. Primary cleavage is to the carbonyl to give a
strong ArCO+ peak (m/z 105 when Ar = Ph). This will lose CO
to give the phenyl cation (m/z 77).
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
43/68
7. Aldehydes
Aldehydes show weak but discernable M+ peaks. Major
pathways are -cleavage and McLafferty Rearrangement.
O
H
H
M+m/z = 86
A B
C
O
H
+ +A
M-1 m/z = 85
O
H +
M-R m/z = 29
H
OH+
m/z = 44
B
C
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
44/68
7. Aromatic Aldehydes
are similar to aromatic ketones. M+ is strong, and M-1 (-
cleavage to carbonyl) is also strong to give the ArCO+ ion (m/z
105 for Ar = Ph). Loss of CO from this ion is common to give
m/z77 phenyl cation.
O
H
+
M+m/z = 106
O
+
M-1 m/z = 105
-CO +
m/z = 77
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
45/68
8. Carboxylic Acids (Aliphatic)
M+ is weak, and not always visible. A characteristic m/z 60 peak
is often present due to the McLafferty Rearrangement. Bonds
to carbonyl also frequently break to give M-OH and M-CO2H
peaks.
OH
O
M+m/z = 88
O
+
+m/z = 71
+ m/z = 43
OH
OH+
m/z = 60
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
46/68
Aromatic Acids
M+ is very prominent. Common peaks are loss of OH (M-17)
and loss of CO2H (M-45).
H3C
O
OH
+
M+ m/z = 136
H3C
O
+
M-17 m/z = 119
H3C+
M-45 m/z = 91
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
47/68
Aromatic Acids
If anortho hydrogen-bearing group is present, loss of water
(M-18) is visible as well.
OH2
O
+H
H
H
O
OH2+
O
+
M+ m/z = 136 M-18 m/z = 118
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
48/68
9. Aliphatic Esters
M+ is usually distinct. The most characteristic peak is due to
the McLafferty rearrangement.
O
O
M+ m/z = 144
H+
O
OH+
+
m/z = 88
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
49/68
Aromatic Esters
M+ is usually prominent, unless RO chain is long. The base
peak is loss of RO.
O
O
m/z = 164
+
O
+
O
m/z = 105
+
+ CO
m/z = 77
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
50/68
Aromatic Esters
The McLafferty rearrangement give the corresponding acid.
A more complicated rearrangement often gives a prominent
acid+1 peak.
O
O
m/z = 164
+ H
O
OH
+
m/z = 122
OH
OH
+
m/z = 123
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
51/68
10. Amines
Aliphatic monoamines have odd numbered and weak M+
peaks. Most important cleavage is usually breakage of the
C-C bond next to the C-N bond.
NH3
m/z = 73
H
NH2 NH2 NH2
m/z = 72 m/z = 58 m/z = 44
+
+ + +
2
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
52/68
10. Amines
The base peak in nearly all primary amines comes at 30 m/z.
NH2+
NH2
+
m/z = 101m/z = 30
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
53/68
Aromatic Amines
M+ is intense (why?). An NH bond can be broken to give a
moderately intense M-1 peak.
N
H
H
+
- H N
H
+
m/z = 93 m/z = 92
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
54/68
Aromatic Amines
A common fragmentation is loss of HCN and H2CN to give
peaks at 65 and 66 m/z.
N
H
H
+
m/z = 93
A i A i
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
55/68
Aromatic Amines
Alkyl substituted aromatic amines typically show breakage of
the C-C bond next to the C-N to give a strong peak at 106
when Ar = Ph.
N
H
+
m/z = 121
N
H
+
m/z = 106
11 A id
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
56/68
11. Amides
Primary amides give a strong peak at m/z 44 due to breakage
of the R-CONH2 bond.
NH2
O+
m/z = 115
+NH2
O
+
m/z = 44
11 A id
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
57/68
11. Amides
Aliphatic amides M+ is weak but discernible. For straight-
chain amides more than 3 carbons, McLafferty gives the base
peak at m/z 59.
NH2
O
H +OH
NH2
+
m/z =115
m/z = 59
+
A ti A id
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
58/68
Aromatic Amides
Any familiar features?
A ti A id
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
59/68
Aromatic Amides
M+ is strong. Loss of NH2 to make PhCO+ (105) followed by
loss of CO to make the phenyl cation (77).
O
NH2
+
O
++
m/z = 121 m/z = 105 m/z = 77
12 Nitriles
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
60/68
12. Nitriles
M+ are weak or absent for aliphatic nitriles. Loss of the -
hydrogen can give a weak M-1 peak.
C
N
H
+
C
N+
m/z = 69 m/z = 68
Nitriles
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
61/68
Nitriles
Base peak is usually 41 due to a rearrangement like the
McLafferty. This has limited diagnostic value since (C3H5+)
has the same mass.
C
N
H
H
H +
m/z = 69
CH2
C
NH+
+
m/z = 41
13 Nitro compounds
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
62/68
13. Nitro compounds
Aliphatic nitro compounds have weak odd M+. The main
peaks are hydrocarbon fragments up to M-NO2.
NO2
m/z = 29
m/z = 43
m/z = 57
m/z = 71
m/z = 85
+
+
+
+
+
m/z = 131
Aromatic Nitro Compounds
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
63/68
Aromatic Nitro Compounds
M+ is strong. Prominent peaks result from loss of NO2radical to give an M-46 peak. Also prominent is M-30 from
loss of NO. NO
2
m/z = 123 M-46 m/z = 77
+
+ NO
O
+
-
M-30 m/z = 93
Example: 4-methyl-2-hexene
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
64/68
Example: 4-methyl-2-hexene
m/z = 98
*
**
*
*
98
83
69
41
29
Example: 3-methyl-1-pentanol
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
65/68
Example: 3 methyl 1 pentanol
OH
m/z =102
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
102
84
69
56
57
45
31
Example: 4-methyl-2-pentanol
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
66/68
Example: 4 methyl 2 pentanol
OH
m/z = 102
*
*
*
*
**
* 1028784
69
57
45
43
Example: 2-phenylethanol
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
67/68
Example: 2 phenylethanol
OH
m/z = 122
*
*
* * *
122
91
1047731
Example: 1-phenylethanol
7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]
68/68
Example: 1 phenylethanol
m/z = 122
OH
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
122
107
105
91
79
77
43