MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    1/68

    Mass Spec - FragmentationAn extremely useful result of EI ionization in particular is a

    phenomenon known asfragmentation.

    The radical cation that is produced when an electron is knocked out

    of a neutral closed-shell molecule in EIMS initially possesses a lot of

    energy.

    Energy sufficient to break chemical bonds: radical cation will usuallybreak into a neutral radical and a cation. It is also possible for a

    neutral closed shell fragment (such as water) to fall off.

    CH3 OH CH3 OH

    +

    CH3

    OH+

    CH3

    OH+

    CH2 OH+ H

    CH3

    OH

    + 1 electron 2 electrons+

    +

    ++

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    2/68

    Predicting Fragmentation

    A considerable volume of literature regarding the

    fragmentation reactions of certain molecules is available.

    Using this knowledge, we can predict how a given molecule

    might fragment.

    But first a few conventions.

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    3/68

    Conventions

    It is always best to localize the cation and radical, obeying the

    rules of Lewis structures (i.e. dont put more than 8electrons on carbon).

    For example, for the three structures above, A is discouraged

    in favour of B or C. This convention is not always possible

    to obey (alkanes).

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    4/68

    More on Conventions

    When a molecule is ionized by EIMS, must decide which

    electron to remove. Always best to remove an electron from

    a -bond, or from aheteroatom lone pair. It will become

    more clear which is the better choice when we look at

    individual examples.

    The bond breaking can be done either byhomolytic or

    heterolytic cleavage.H3C CH2 O R

    EI

    CH3 CH2 O R+

    CH3 H2C O R++

    H3C CH2 Br

    EI

    CH3 CH2 Br+

    CH3 CH2+ + Br

    Homolytic Heterolytic

    1 e

    2 e

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    5/68

    Fragmentation Notes

    - Most fragments are even-electron cations. These split to

    make more even-electron cations.

    - The probability of cleaving a given bond is related to the

    bond strength, and to the stability of the fragments formed.

    In particular, cations like to rearrange or decay into more

    stable cations.

    - Remember that for a ring system, at least 2 bonds must

    break for the ring to fragment.

    In addition, there are 10 general rules to keep in mind when

    predicting the most likely ions to be formed for a given

    molecule.

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    6/68

    Fragmentation Guidelines

    1. The relative height of the M+ peak is greatest for straight-

    chain molecules and decreases as the branching increases.

    2. The relative height of the M+ peak decreases with chain lengthfor a homologous series.

    3. Cleavage is favoured at alkyl-substituted carbons, with the

    probability of cleavage increasing as the substitution increases.These rules mostly arise from the fact that carbocation and radical

    stability show the following trend:

    Most Stable Benzylic > Allylic > Tertiary > Secondary >> Primary Least Stable

    Stevensons Rule

    At the point of breakage, the larger fragment usually takes the

    radical to leave the smaller cation.

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    7/68

    Fragmentation Guidelines

    4. Double bonds, cyclic structures, and especially aromatic rings

    will stabilize the molecular ion and increase its probability of

    appearance.5. Double bonds favor allylic cleavage to give a resonance

    stabilized allylic carbocation, especially for cycloalkenes.

    6. For saturated rings (like cyclohexanes), the side chains tend

    to cleave first leaving the positive charge with the ring.

    R+

    + + R

    EI + +

    +

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    8/68

    Fragmentation Guidelines

    7. Unsaturated rings can also undergoretro-Diels-Alder

    reactions to eliminate a neutral alkene.

    8. Aromatic compounds tend to cleave to give benzylic cations,

    or more likely tropylium cations.

    EI + ++

    +

    R

    EI

    R +

    +

    +

    m/z 91

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    9/68

    Fragmentation Guidelines

    9. C-C bonds next to heteroatoms often break leaving the

    positive charge on the carbon with the heteroatom.

    10. Cleavage is often favoured if it can expelsmall stablemolecules like water, CO, NH3, H2S, etc.

    In addition to bond fragmentation, various intramolecular

    rearrangements can take place to give sometimes unexpected

    ions.

    O+

    O+

    +O

    +

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    10/68

    Rearrangements

    One common type of rearrangement in MS is theMcLafferty

    rearrangement which takes place in compounds that

    contain a carbonyl group.

    Many other rearrangements are possible, even some that are

    not well understood and are considered random.

    O

    Y

    H+

    OH+

    +

    H3C

    CH3

    CH3

    CH3

    +

    CH3CH2+

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    11/68

    Chem 325

    Mass Spectra

    of

    Various Classes

    of

    Organic Compounds

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    12/68

    1. Saturated HydrocarbonsGeneral rules 1-3 apply well to hydrocarbons.

    Rearrangements are common but usually do not give

    intense peaks.

    The M+ peak of a straight-chain hydrocarbon is always visible,

    but decreases in intensity as the molecule gets larger. The

    fragmentation pattern is characterized by peaks separated

    by 14 mass units (a CH2 group). The most intense peaks are

    the C3 C5 fragments.

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    13/68

    Branched HydrocarbonsThe MS for branched saturated hydrocarbons are similar,

    except certain fragments become more prominent.

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    14/68

    CI-MS

    For some types of compounds the M+ peak is very weak or

    not observable at all!

    Due to EI ionization being a hard ionization: so much

    internal energy is given to the molecular ion that extensive

    fragmentation immediately results.

    How to measure the molecular mass??

    Chemical Ionization (CI).

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    15/68

    Chemical Ionization

    Ion source filled with relatively high pressure reagent gas,

    example isobutane i-C4H10, ammonia, or methane CH4

    Electron impact ionizes the CH4, high pressure ensuresmany ion-molecule collisions and reactions to produce

    CH5+, which acts as aprotonating agent when it collides

    with sample molecule M

    e CH4 CH5+

    CH5+ + M MH+ + CH4

    (M+C2H

    5)+, (M+C

    3H

    5)+

    Can also use i-C4H10, NH3, etc.

    soft ionization: much less fragmentation, can see molecular ion

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    16/68

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    17/68

    Cyclic Hydrocarbons

    Cyclic hydrocarbons show a much more intense M+ ion (Rule 4)

    Two bonds must break to form fragments.

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    18/68

    2. Alkenes

    It is usually easy to see the M+ peak of alkenes in EIMS.

    In acyclic alkenes, the double bond freely migrates in the

    fragments, so it can be difficult to determine the doublebond location, but for cyclic alkenes it is easier.

    Cleavage usually happens at allylic bonds (Rule 5).

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    19/68

    3. Aromatic Hydrocarbons

    Aromatic hydrocarbons usually show strong M+ peaks (Rule 4).

    Aromatic rings are stable and have a lower tendency to

    fragment.

    Alkyl substituted benzenes often give a strong peak at m/z 91

    due to benzylic cleavage (Rule 8).

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    20/68

    MS of n-butylbenzene

    +

    +

    +

    +

    m/z 91

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    21/68

    4. Alcohols

    Alcohols fragment very easily secondary and primary alcohols show

    very weak M+ peaks, and tertiary alcohols often do not show M+ at

    all. MW is often determined by derivatization or CI-MS.

    The C-C bond nearest the OH is frequently the first bond to break.

    Thus primary alcohols often show a prominent peak at 31 m/z.

    OH+ OH OH++

    m/z = 60 m/z = 31

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    22/68

    Secondary Alcohols

    Secondary alcohols cleave in the same way, often showing a

    prominent +CHR-OH peak.

    OH+

    m/z = 74

    OH

    +

    m/z = 45

    OH+

    OH

    +

    m/z = 74 m/z = 59

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    23/68

    Alcohols

    Sometimes the hydrogen R2CH-OH in 1 and 2 alcohols

    cleaves rather than an alkyl group. The result is an M-1

    peak.

    H

    OH+

    OH

    +

    M+m/z = 74 M-1m/z = 73

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    24/68

    Tertiary Alcohols

    Tertiary alcohols cleave in a similar fashion to give +CRR-OH

    fragments.

    OH+

    A B

    OH

    +

    m/z = 116 (not observed)

    OH

    +

    A B

    m/z = 101m/z = 59

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    25/68

    More on Alcohols

    Alcohols can lose a molecule of water to show a sometimes

    prominent M-18 peak. It is especially noticeable for

    primary alcohols.

    O

    H

    +

    H

    HO

    H+

    +

    M+m/z = 102 M-18m/z = 84

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    26/68

    Benzylic Alcohols

    Benzylic alcohols fragment much differently from aliphatic

    alcohols. Benzylic cleavage happens as expected (Rule 8).

    Benzyl alcohol fragments via the following pathway:

    OH

    +

    OH

    +-H -CO

    H H

    + H

    H

    H

    H

    H+

    m/z = 108 m/z = 107 m/z = 79 m/z = 77

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    27/68

    Benzylic Alcohols

    Benzylic alcohols will usually lose water (M-18). The M-18

    peak is especially strong for molecules for which loss of water

    is mechanistically straightforward.

    H

    O

    H

    + +

    m/z = 122 m/z = 104

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    28/68

    Phenols

    Phenols often show peaks at 77 m/z resulting from formation

    of phenyl cation, and peaks resulting from loss of CO (M-28)

    and CHO (M-29) are usually found in phenols.

    OH

    94

    M-28

    M-29

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    29/68

    Phenols

    If alternative attractive cleavage pathways are available for

    phenols, the molecule will often take that path.

    Molecular ions will fragment along the path of least

    resistance!

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    30/68

    Example: Octane

    m/z = 114

    *

    *

    *

    * *

    *

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    31/68

    Example: 4-methyl-2-hexene

    m/z = 98

    *

    **

    *

    *

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    32/68

    Example: 3-methyl-1-pentanol

    OH

    m/z = 102

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    33/68

    Example: 4-methyl-2-pentanol

    OH

    m/z = 102

    *

    *

    *

    *

    **

    *

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    34/68

    Example: 2-phenylethanol

    OH

    m/z = 122

    *

    *

    * * *

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    35/68

    Example: 1-phenylethanol

    m/z = 122

    OH

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    36/68

    5. Ethers

    Cleavage happens in two main ways:

    1. Breakage of the C-C bond next to O (like alcohols)

    OCH3

    m/z = 88

    A B

    A

    OCH3

    + +

    m/z = 73

    OCH3

    +or

    +

    B

    m/z = 59 m/z = 29

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    37/68

    Ethers

    Cleavage happens in two main ways:

    2. C-O bond cleavage with the charge on the C fragment.

    OCH3+

    O CH3+

    m/z = 57m/z = 88

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    38/68

    Aromatic Ethers

    M+ is usually strong. MS is similar to phenols both form

    phenoxyl cation (m/z 93) and associated daughters.

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    39/68

    6. Ketones

    Ketones usually give strong M+ peaks. A major fragmentation

    pathway involves -cleavage to give anacylium ion.

    O

    A B

    A

    B

    O

    O

    + +

    +

    m/z = 57

    m/z = 71

    m/z = 100

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    40/68

    6. Ketones

    The carbonyl-containing fragment can also take the radical.

    O

    A B

    A

    B

    O

    O

    +

    +

    m/z = 43

    m/z = 100

    +

    m/z = 29

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    41/68

    6. Ketones

    For ketones with longer chains, the McLafferty

    rearrangement often leads to strong peaks.

    O

    H+

    m/z = 128

    OH+

    m/z = 58

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    42/68

    6. Aromatic Ketones

    M+ is evident. Primary cleavage is to the carbonyl to give a

    strong ArCO+ peak (m/z 105 when Ar = Ph). This will lose CO

    to give the phenyl cation (m/z 77).

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    43/68

    7. Aldehydes

    Aldehydes show weak but discernable M+ peaks. Major

    pathways are -cleavage and McLafferty Rearrangement.

    O

    H

    H

    M+m/z = 86

    A B

    C

    O

    H

    + +A

    M-1 m/z = 85

    O

    H +

    M-R m/z = 29

    H

    OH+

    m/z = 44

    B

    C

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    44/68

    7. Aromatic Aldehydes

    are similar to aromatic ketones. M+ is strong, and M-1 (-

    cleavage to carbonyl) is also strong to give the ArCO+ ion (m/z

    105 for Ar = Ph). Loss of CO from this ion is common to give

    m/z77 phenyl cation.

    O

    H

    +

    M+m/z = 106

    O

    +

    M-1 m/z = 105

    -CO +

    m/z = 77

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    45/68

    8. Carboxylic Acids (Aliphatic)

    M+ is weak, and not always visible. A characteristic m/z 60 peak

    is often present due to the McLafferty Rearrangement. Bonds

    to carbonyl also frequently break to give M-OH and M-CO2H

    peaks.

    OH

    O

    M+m/z = 88

    O

    +

    +m/z = 71

    + m/z = 43

    OH

    OH+

    m/z = 60

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    46/68

    Aromatic Acids

    M+ is very prominent. Common peaks are loss of OH (M-17)

    and loss of CO2H (M-45).

    H3C

    O

    OH

    +

    M+ m/z = 136

    H3C

    O

    +

    M-17 m/z = 119

    H3C+

    M-45 m/z = 91

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    47/68

    Aromatic Acids

    If anortho hydrogen-bearing group is present, loss of water

    (M-18) is visible as well.

    OH2

    O

    +H

    H

    H

    O

    OH2+

    O

    +

    M+ m/z = 136 M-18 m/z = 118

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    48/68

    9. Aliphatic Esters

    M+ is usually distinct. The most characteristic peak is due to

    the McLafferty rearrangement.

    O

    O

    M+ m/z = 144

    H+

    O

    OH+

    +

    m/z = 88

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    49/68

    Aromatic Esters

    M+ is usually prominent, unless RO chain is long. The base

    peak is loss of RO.

    O

    O

    m/z = 164

    +

    O

    +

    O

    m/z = 105

    +

    + CO

    m/z = 77

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    50/68

    Aromatic Esters

    The McLafferty rearrangement give the corresponding acid.

    A more complicated rearrangement often gives a prominent

    acid+1 peak.

    O

    O

    m/z = 164

    + H

    O

    OH

    +

    m/z = 122

    OH

    OH

    +

    m/z = 123

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    51/68

    10. Amines

    Aliphatic monoamines have odd numbered and weak M+

    peaks. Most important cleavage is usually breakage of the

    C-C bond next to the C-N bond.

    NH3

    m/z = 73

    H

    NH2 NH2 NH2

    m/z = 72 m/z = 58 m/z = 44

    +

    + + +

    2

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    52/68

    10. Amines

    The base peak in nearly all primary amines comes at 30 m/z.

    NH2+

    NH2

    +

    m/z = 101m/z = 30

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    53/68

    Aromatic Amines

    M+ is intense (why?). An NH bond can be broken to give a

    moderately intense M-1 peak.

    N

    H

    H

    +

    - H N

    H

    +

    m/z = 93 m/z = 92

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    54/68

    Aromatic Amines

    A common fragmentation is loss of HCN and H2CN to give

    peaks at 65 and 66 m/z.

    N

    H

    H

    +

    m/z = 93

    A i A i

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    55/68

    Aromatic Amines

    Alkyl substituted aromatic amines typically show breakage of

    the C-C bond next to the C-N to give a strong peak at 106

    when Ar = Ph.

    N

    H

    +

    m/z = 121

    N

    H

    +

    m/z = 106

    11 A id

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    56/68

    11. Amides

    Primary amides give a strong peak at m/z 44 due to breakage

    of the R-CONH2 bond.

    NH2

    O+

    m/z = 115

    +NH2

    O

    +

    m/z = 44

    11 A id

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    57/68

    11. Amides

    Aliphatic amides M+ is weak but discernible. For straight-

    chain amides more than 3 carbons, McLafferty gives the base

    peak at m/z 59.

    NH2

    O

    H +OH

    NH2

    +

    m/z =115

    m/z = 59

    +

    A ti A id

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    58/68

    Aromatic Amides

    Any familiar features?

    A ti A id

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    59/68

    Aromatic Amides

    M+ is strong. Loss of NH2 to make PhCO+ (105) followed by

    loss of CO to make the phenyl cation (77).

    O

    NH2

    +

    O

    ++

    m/z = 121 m/z = 105 m/z = 77

    12 Nitriles

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    60/68

    12. Nitriles

    M+ are weak or absent for aliphatic nitriles. Loss of the -

    hydrogen can give a weak M-1 peak.

    C

    N

    H

    +

    C

    N+

    m/z = 69 m/z = 68

    Nitriles

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    61/68

    Nitriles

    Base peak is usually 41 due to a rearrangement like the

    McLafferty. This has limited diagnostic value since (C3H5+)

    has the same mass.

    C

    N

    H

    H

    H +

    m/z = 69

    CH2

    C

    NH+

    +

    m/z = 41

    13 Nitro compounds

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    62/68

    13. Nitro compounds

    Aliphatic nitro compounds have weak odd M+. The main

    peaks are hydrocarbon fragments up to M-NO2.

    NO2

    m/z = 29

    m/z = 43

    m/z = 57

    m/z = 71

    m/z = 85

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    m/z = 131

    Aromatic Nitro Compounds

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    63/68

    Aromatic Nitro Compounds

    M+ is strong. Prominent peaks result from loss of NO2radical to give an M-46 peak. Also prominent is M-30 from

    loss of NO. NO

    2

    m/z = 123 M-46 m/z = 77

    +

    + NO

    O

    +

    -

    M-30 m/z = 93

    Example: 4-methyl-2-hexene

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    64/68

    Example: 4-methyl-2-hexene

    m/z = 98

    *

    **

    *

    *

    98

    83

    69

    41

    29

    Example: 3-methyl-1-pentanol

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    65/68

    Example: 3 methyl 1 pentanol

    OH

    m/z =102

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    102

    84

    69

    56

    57

    45

    31

    Example: 4-methyl-2-pentanol

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    66/68

    Example: 4 methyl 2 pentanol

    OH

    m/z = 102

    *

    *

    *

    *

    **

    * 1028784

    69

    57

    45

    43

    Example: 2-phenylethanol

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    67/68

    Example: 2 phenylethanol

    OH

    m/z = 122

    *

    *

    * * *

    122

    91

    1047731

    Example: 1-phenylethanol

  • 7/25/2019 MS Fragmentation Functional Groups [Compatibility Mode]

    68/68

    Example: 1 phenylethanol

    m/z = 122

    OH

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    122

    107

    105

    91

    79

    77

    43