Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2 May 2016
Ms. Grainne Oglesby Administration Officer Office of Climate, Licensing & Resource Use Environmental Protection Agency PO Box 3000 Johnstown Castle Estate County Rexford Re: Response in Relation to Licence Application Reg No: P-0977-01 by Magh nAla, LTD. Dear Ms. Grainne Oglesby: Please find attached response in relation to the additional information requested in your correspondence of the 23rd March 2016. The additional information requested is for a licence application by Magh nAla, Ltd (Reg. No. P0977-01). In order for the application to be determined, Magh nAla was requested by the EPA (Reference Correspondence letter from the EPA dated 23rd March 2016) to provide an updated non-technical summary to reflect the information previously supplied in Table G.1 (i), Table H.3 (i), Table E.1 (i) Building 1, Table E.1 (i) Building 2, and Table E.1 (iv) Building 1 (updated), and contained in Attachment 1 of this document. The listed tables detailing information for Buildings 1 and 2 have been provided in Attachment 2. Further correspondence from the Agency was received in March 2016 made under Article 10(2)(b)(ii) of the EPA (Industrial Emissions) (Licensing) Regulations 2013 requesting Magh nAla provide information for the following aspects;
Hours of Operation [Regulation 9(2)(b)]; Air Emissions [Regulation 9(2)(k)], including:
o Emissions from Boiler; o Emissions from Building 1 (Emission Point A); o Emissions from Building 2 (Emission Point B); o Air Dispersion Modelling; and o Solvent Use and Consumption
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
• Emissions to Sewer [Regulation 9(2)(k)]; • Emissions to Water [Regulation 9(2)(k)]; • Baseline Report [Regulation 9(2)(n)]; • Process Chemicals Stored Onsite; and • Statutory Requirements
Hours of Operation [Regulation 9(2)(b)] The facility (Building I) presently employs I 0 - 15 people on a fi.JII time basis to support the zinc pigment manufacturing operation. Building I operates 24 hours a day 4 days a week and is closed on weekends and public holidays (Note the facility is open on a Friday but does not include manufacturing).
It is proposed that the new facility (Building 2) operate 24 hours a day, seven days per week. Products manufactured in this operations are prepared using a batch (not continuous) process.
Air Emissions [Regulation 9(7)(k)l
Emissions ti"om Boiler In Building I, the boiler is not intended for industrial use but rather services domestic hot water and space heating purposes. The LPHW unit is DE Dietrich GT228 Cast Iron Boiler with a I OOkW rating. Kerosene is used as the boiler fuel resulting in very low emissions of S02, NOx and particulates. It is located on the plant floor. There are no process sources of S02 or NOx.
In Building 2, the proposed boiler will be a similar model with an 80 kW rating. It is also used for space heating purposes and is not intended for industrial use. This boiler will also have very low emissions of S02, NOx, and particulates.
Since neither boiler is for industrial use nor, more importantly, neither has a rated capacity of 5MW (gas boiler) or 250kW (other fuels), they were not considered a signiiicant source for emissions. Therefore, air dispersion modelling was not performed on this equipment. Please see Tables E. I (i) completed for Buildings I and 2 in Attachment 2.
Emissions fi·om Buildinr.z I (Emission Poi111 A) Existing Facility Legend: Point A on Map 112142-SK-006 (submitted with original application) X,Y: 554481,597514 Flue Diameter: 300mm Flue Height: 9750mm above ground level
The emissions !l·om point A referenced above are from a fume cupboard. The fume cupboard is located in the Quality Control laboratory in Building I. It is considered a minor source of emissions. Due to the very low usage of the fume hood, it was not included in the air dispersion modelling.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
VOCs would be the only source of emissions from the fctme cupboard. The emissions would be very low due to the small amount of chemicals used in the laboratory. Please refer to Table E. I (iv) in Attachment 2 for further information on emissions.
Emissions fi'om Building 2 (Emission Poinr B)
Proposed Facility Legend: Point Bon Map 112142-SK-006 (submitted with original application) X,Y: 554493,597563 Flue Diameter: 150mm Flue Height: 11 OOOmm above ground level
In Building 2 the process involves the transfer and mixing of liquid materials only. There is no particulate matter coming from the process, hence there are no dust abatement measures required.
Emissions in the fonn ofVOCs will only arise during the condensation step of the process proposed for Building 2. As the manufacturing process is completed in a closed mixing vessel, the VOC release to atmosphere is minimal. The main control measure in place is the closed nature of the process and the pumped transfers of each raw material input. It is estimated that there will be an overall 2% solvent loss from the overall process operation. This estimate is based on mass loss calculations performed on pilot plant operations.
Based on these calculations, the average daily volume ofVOC discharge is estimated to be in the region of27.2 kg/day. The volumetric flow rate for Emission Point B is 0.069Nm3/day.
Air Dispersion Modelling Air Emission Modelling was caiTied out to detennine the impact, if any, on ambient air quality arising from the mixing process in Building 2. Maximum emission levels for pollutant emissions were used in the air dispersion modelling exercise. The overall impact to the receiving environment was assessed by undertaking dispersion modelling using the EPA approved modelling software SCREEN3.
The modelling exercise was originally conducted by SiteRlTE Environmental. The report on the assessment of impact on air quality arising from the proposed use of a single vent containing npropanol solvent was included in the original application in 2013. The parameters used in modelling were based on the worst case scenario. It was calculated that predicted ground level concentrations of n-Propanol, 678 ~tg/mg3 , are substantially below the Environmental Assessment Level of 73 8,000 f.lg/mg3. It was concluded that no further assessment of impact is necessary.
Unfortunately the incmTect stack information was provided to SiteRITE Environmental for the modelling exercise. This oversight was not noticed in the original application. The air emission dispersion was recalculated using the SCREEN3 modelling software mentioned in the report. The only change was the information on stack height for Emission Point B. The stack height is II m and the flue diameter is 0.15m. When these parameters are substituted, the maximum
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
ground level concentration ofn-propanol arising from a single vent is 337.6 f.lg/mg3. This
concentration continues to be significantly lower than the Environmental Assessment Level mentioned above. Please see the air modelling report and output file in Attachment 3.
Solvent Use The processes in Building I involve a wet mill and dry mill operations. In the wet mill operation, zinc powder is reduced in particle size in a lubricant and solvent using a media. The resulting material is a functional pigment that would be used in anti-corrosion coatings. The pigment was developed primarily for the automotive market, but there are non-automotive applications as well.
In the dry mill operation, zinc powder is once again reduced in particle size in a lubricant. However, no solvents are used in this process.
In Building 2, organometallic compounds are manufactured in a closed mixing vessel. The solvents proposed for use in the manufacturing process (Refer to G(i) and G(ii) from main IPPC Application submitted in March 2013 and Attachment 2) are not categorised as Carcinogens, Mutagens or Reproductive toxins or Annex I chemicals in any related Directives and not listed in the schedule of principal polluting substances (Regulation 39) contained in EPA (Industrial Emissions) licensing) Regulations 2013.
In evaluating the solvent use and processes in Building I and Building 2, it has been determined there are no process activities which come under the scope of Chapter V of the Industrial Emissions Directive 20 I 0/75/EU. The scheduled list of activities was reviewed to make this conclusion.
Emissions to Sewer [Regulation 9(7)(k)] Mallow Town Cork County Council is the authority responsible for discharges to sewer (domestic) from Buildings I and 2.
Sanitary waste and canteen waste water streams are piped tl·om Building I to the municipal foul sewer system. The operation in Building I does not include water in the manufacturing process.
There are no sanitary services available in Building 2. Therefore, there are no emissions to sewer for this facility.
Sprinkler water contaminated or potentially contaminated (in the event of sprinkler activation) from either building will be diverted to the underground storage tank for firewater retention from which it will be transferred to a tanker for off-site treatment and disposal.
Emissions to Water [Regulation 9(2l(k)J A site map (112142-CV-002-1) has been provided in Attachment 4 ofthis letter. It is the drainage map showing the locations of Building I and Building 2. Surface water from the site will discharge to the IDA Industrial Estate storm water system.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
In Building I there is no water used in the manufacturing process. The manufactming process consists of zinc pigment manufacturing. There would be no discharge to the public trade effluent discharge system.
In Building 2 the CTF for the jacket of the mixing vessel is an aqueous mixture of glycol and water. This is a closed system and no additional water or materials are required for the jacket. The annual consumption of water consists of adding 25litres to the vacuum pump every three months, if needed, to replenish the system. This water may be potentially contaminated with isopropanol from the condenser. Any water removed from the process would be sent off-site at an approved waste transfer facility for disposal. There shall be no discharge to the public trade effluent discharge system from Building 2.
Magh nAla will ensure that there are adequate mitigation measures in place (prior to Operational phase) to deal with unplanned events including; • Provision of experienced personnel in the facility and implementation of appropriate training for facility personnel particularly in areas including; PLC and SCAD A operating system, Preventative Maintenance, Safely SOP's. • Implementation of a site specific Environmental management System (EMS) including and Environmental Management Programme (EMP) and Corrective Action Procedures. • Provision of impermeable flooring in areas of the facility associated with the movement, handling and storage of potentially contaminating materials. • Provision of a Jirewater retention tank which will allow for the collection of potentially contaminated Erewater or any spills or leaks to be retained within the site pending sampling and removal off site. • Optimum layout for the storage of process raw materials and finished product in fully contained and bunded storage facilities. • Provision of appropriate bunding for all tank and drum storage areas (internally) and integrity testing of these (as per the frequency set by the sites fl.tlme licence). Additionally there is a floor sump in Building 2 to deal with any local leaks/spills ±!·om the system. • Provision and maintenance of appropriate spill response and clean-up equipment in areas where there is a risk of spills occmTing. • A Baseline Report was conducted by Priority Geotechnical LTD for Buildings I and 2.
Baseline Report !Regulation 9(2)(n)] In early October 2015 a Baseline Report was conducted by Priority Geoteclmical. The report originally filed had an error in the title stating the work was commenced for Building 3. It has been since corrected. The report (resubmitted in Attachment 5) now clearly states that the work detailed was for Building I and Building 2. A map where samples were taken ±!·om the site is transcribed in the report.
The environmental soil samples recovered from depths !.Om bglto 6.0m bgl were analysed for; • asbestos, • metals, • volatile organic compounds (VOC),
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
• semi volatile organic compounds (SVOC), • Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), • polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (P AH 17), • total phenols, • total petroleum hydrocarbons, • Criteria Working Group (TPH CWO), • Benzene, Toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX), and • polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
All soil detem1inands analysed were screened against either UK Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) or generic assessment criteria for a commercial land use scenario.
All materials used in Building I and Building 2 have been listed in Table G .1 (i) in Attachment 2. There are no additional process materials used in either facility.
Statutory Requirements The proposed facility does not fall under the provisions of the European Communities (Control of Major Accident Hazards Involving Dangerous Substances) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 74 of2006) (COMAH Regulations) and regulated by the Irish Health and Safety Authority on the basis that it will not exceed current annual threshold limits set down for zinc powder and the relevant solvents.
The layout of the proposed development separates the distinct manufacturing operations i.e. organometallic compounds and zinc pigment, the related raw materials are stored and processed in defined areas, all equipment within these areas will be ex rated.
Magh nAla will continue to ensure that inventories are managed on an ongoing basis so that thresholds for relevant dangerous substances are not breached in the context of the current Seveso III requirements. The facility utilizes a computer software system for inventory control. Operators also perfom1 physical counts to confirm the inventory.
We hope the information provided within satisfies the request of the Agency made under A1iicle I 0(2)(b )(ii) of the EPA (Industrial Emissions) (Licensing) Regulations 2013.
Yours sincerely,
Kieran Murray, General Manager, For Magh nA!a, LTD
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
MAoH nALA, LTD"
ATTACHMENT 1
Updated Non-Technical Summary
Revision C
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
GH nALA, LTII
UPDATED NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY FOR
MAGH nALA IPPC LICENCE APPLICATION (BUILDING 2)
IDA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE LOWER QUARTERTOWN, MALLOW
CO. CORK IRELAND
Revision C 7 April 2016
Mat·y Kay Heidtke, EHS Engineer
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
CONTENTS
1.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 OVERALL DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3 OVERALL DESCRIPTION OF EMISSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4 EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 EMISSIONS TO SEWER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.6 EMISSIONS TO WATER ...................................... 7
1.7 PROCESS CHEMICALS STORED ONSITE ......................... 8
1.8 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS .................................. 9
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
1.0 NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The current manufacturing facility, Magh nA!a, in Mallow, Co Cork was installed in 2010. It is located in the IDA Industrial Estate, Lower Qumiertown, Mallow, Co. Cork. Cunently it operates as a zinc pigment manufacturer, the products from which are used primarily as a key component in anti-conosion coatings lor the automotive market.
The facility is proposing to expand the product line. As a result of its intent to manufacture an organometallic compound in its future activities, Magh nA!a has applied to the EPA (correspondence letter and IPPC application submitted 22nd March 2013) for an Integrated Pollution Prevention Control (IPPC) licence under Classes 5.12 (g) "The production of basic organic chemicals such as: (g) organometallic compounds" of the First Schedule of the Protection of the Environment Act 2003.
In order for the application to be determined, Magh nAla was requested by the EPA (Reference Correspondence letter J1·om the EPA dated 07 April 20 16) to provide an updated nontechnical summary to reflect the information previously supplied in Tables G.1(i), Table H.3 (i) and Table E.1 (ii).
Further correspondence Ji·om the Agency was received in April2016 made under Article 10(2)(b)(ii) of the EPA (Industrial Emissions) (Licensing) Regulations 2013 requesting Magh nA!a provide information for the following aspects;
• Hours of Operation [Regulation 9(2)(b)]; • Air Emissions [Regulation 9(2)(k)], including:
o Emissions !rom Boiler; o Emissions Jl·om Building 1 (Emission Point A); o Emissions Jl·om Building 2 (Emission Point B); o Air Dispersion Modelling; and o Solvent Use and Consumption
• Emissions to Sewer [Regulation 9(2)(k)]; • Emissions to Water [Regulation 9(2)(k)]; • Process Chemicals Stored Onsite; • Statutory Requirements
In view of the above request, the Non-Technical Summary has been fi.Irther updated to reflect the infom1ation provided in the response letter. Information on the manufacturing processes for both Building 1 (existing) and Building 2 (proposed) has been included.
1.2 OVERALL DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY
The facility presently employs I 0 - 15 people on a full time basis to supp01i the zinc pigment manufacturing operation. The facility (Building 1) operates 24 hours a day 4 days a week and is closed on weekends and public holidays (Note the facility is open on a Friday but does not
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
include manufacturing). It is proposed that the new facility (Building 2) operate 24 hours a day, seven days per week.
Raw materials for the current process (Building 1) include zinc, iron oxides, fatty acids, and mineral spirits. Zinc powder is
Raw materials for the proposed process (Building 2) will include three solvents to manufacture the finished product. The process will be housed in a new stand-alone manufacturing facility complete with new process equipment (mixing and receiving vessels), a new water heating and cooling skid, nitrogen generator, vacuum pump and new air handling units. The process will involve a distillation and condensation step. Raw materials are transfened into the mixing vessel via a pumping station. The entire process is completed in a closed vessel to minimize any releases to atmosphere. The operation is a batch process, each batch is maximum 4,000 litres and the process will be optimised to produce a batch every couple of days. After the process is complete, the finished goods arc then pumped into approved IBC containers or drums for shipment. Water is not used in any part of the process hence there are no routine waste water emissions to the trade waste drainage system.
Isopropanol is recovered during the distillation step and is reused in the CJP wash cycle to clean equipment, the waste isopropanolli·om the cleaning process is then drummed and removed from site as hazardous waste by an approved and licenced waste contractor. Apart from a dedicated underground firewater retention tank, there are no other underground storage tanks cmTently on site. All raw materials used in the process are stored intemally in bunded facilities. Their integrity will be tested on a Jl·equency detem1ined by the Agency in the sites future licence.
The source of VOC air emissions fi·om Building 2 is the exhaust air from the condensation step in the process. It is deemed that there will be an overall 2% solvent loss. The process system is a closed system reducing the potential for excess atmospheric emissions being produced, tl1e process has been optimised to ensure raw material efliciency and waste is as minimal as possible.
From an environmental perspective, there are no extemal receptors as the full process is housed indoors. Equipment housed intemally has a Predictive Preventative maintenance plan in place to monitor trace noise and vibration variations and allow for repairs to be made. This includes chillier/Compressor, Air Handler and Reactor Agitator.
1.3 OVERALL DESCRIPTION 011 EMISSIONS
Atmosphere The manufacturing process for the Proposed Development has one main emission point to deal with VOCs, the emissions from this point have been assessed and found to be well within the legislative limits. Refer to Appendix I for Table E. I (ii) "Main Emissions to Atmosphere" in the original lPPC Application Form. ·rhere are no solid materials used in the process, therefore particulate matter (PM) arising Ji-om the process is not a concern.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
The emissions fi·om Building 1 are Jl·om a fume cupboard. The fi.une cupboard is located in the Quality Control laboratory in Building I. Due to the very low usage of the fume hood, it is considered a minor source of emissions. Due to the very low usage of the fume hood, it was not included in the air dispersion modelling.
VOCs would be the only source of emissions from the fi.1me cupboard. The emissions would be very low clue to the small amount of chemicals used in the laboratory. Please refer to Table E.1 (iv) in Attachment 2 for further information on emissions.
Soil & Groundwater Emissions From a water consumption perspective, the process does not require water as a raw material or for cleaning purposes hence there will be no discharges to the waste water system with the exception of surface water !rom roofs, car park and yard areas. As mentioned above, in the event of a fire sprinkler water from either building will divert to an underground firewater retention tank.
The external area is served by a concrete surfaced yard for car parking and HGV deliveries with associated drainage gullies. Equipment will be cleaned by a cleclicatecl CIP system which uses the lPA (recovered 11·om distillation step), upon completion of the CIP cycle, the IPA waste stream is collected and removed from site as hazardous waste. Additionally there are no discharges to the foul water system fi·om this building. Sanitary waste and canteen waste water streams are piped 11·om Building 1 to the municipal foul sewer. In summary there are no scheduled emissions to soil and groundwater 11·om the proposed and existing process and associated infrastructure.
Surface Water
Surface water arising !rom the site (t1·om either roof or uncontaminated yard areas) will discharge to the IDA Industrial Estate stonn water system. Please see map in Attachment 4 of the letter. There will be no enluent discharges from the manufacturing processes in Building 1 and Building 2.
Industrial Waste Water
Neither the manufacturing process in Building 1 nor Building 2 utilise water hence there will be no discharges to the public trade eft1uent discharge system. Sprinkler water contaminated or potentially contaminated (in the event of sprinkler activation) !rom either building will be diverted to the underground storage tank for firewater retention from which it will be transferred to a tanker for off-site treatment and disposal (at an approved disposal facility).
Equipment in Building 1 is llushed with mineral spirits used in the process. The used mineral spirits is re-used as pm1 of the manulacturing process.
Equipment in Building 2 is cleaned by using the recovered IP A 11·om the condensation step and re-used in the CIP wash cycle. Eventually the CIP wash is collected as liquid hazardous waste for otT-site treatment and disposal at an approved facility.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
Waste The non-hazardous waste streams Ji·om Building I comprise waste packaging matelials (timber pallets and plastic packaging)- approximately 2.5 tonnes of this waste will be generated from Building I on an annual basis. Building 2 will accumulate approximately 1.5 tonnes on an annual basis.
The main solid hazardous waste streams will be contaminated packaging i.e. empty packaging contaminated with chemical residues, and protective clothing from both buildings. Building I would generate approximately 3.5 tonnes on an annual basis Building 2 would generate approximately 2.5 tonnes.
In Building I solvents and zinc products can be reworked into the manufacturing process. Occasionally material would not be able to be reworked due to contamination. In this case any material trom this process would be sent to an approved off-site facility for disposal. The process also generates spent filters contaminated with process materials that are sent off-site for incineration at an approved site.
In Building 2 there is little solid waste generated ll·omthe manufacturing process, solid hazardous waste is generated mainly from used protective clothing mentioned above while the liquid fraction is generated Ji·om the rinsing of equipment. This IPA waste will be collected in drums and removed lrom site as hazardous waste. All raw materials arrive in IBC's or drums, the majority of which will be re-used for packaging. The remaining packaging is sent off to a licenced facility as hazardous waste. In addition there are no waste raw materials, all ends of drums etc. are used in the next batch.
Finally in Building I, non-hazardous general waste includes small quantities of paper, cardboard and waste packaging as well as cafeteria waste. Where it is not feasible to recycle segments of this waste it is collected on site for off-site disposal to an approved and licenced landfill site.
1.4 EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE
Existing Facility Legend: Point A on fvlap X,Y: 554481, 597514 Flue Diameter: 300mm Flue Height: 9750mm above ground level
Proposed Facility Legend: Point B on ~1ap X,Y: 554493, 597563 Flue Diameter: 150mm Flue Height: 11 OOOmm above ground level
Nature of Air Emission VOC emissions will only arise during the condensation step of the process proposed for Building 2. As the manufacturing process is completed in a closed mixing vessel, the VOC release to atmosphere is minimal. The main control measure in place is the closed nature of the
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
process and the pumped transfers of each raw material input. It is estimated that there will be an overall 2'Vo solvent Joss f1·om the overall process operation.
There is no particulate matter coming fl·om the process as it involves liquid transfers only hence there are no dust abatement measures required.
Foreseeable Quanti tv of emission The average daily volume of VOC discharge is estimated to be in the region of 0.069 Nm3/day.
Reducing Emissions In order to optimise the reduction ofVOC's at source, a condenser has been installed after the mixer vessel to remove solvents from the vapour stream as soon as they are generated. This works by having a cooling jacket (supplied with chilled water) around the condenser which will convert the solvent vapours back to liquid and return them to a condensate receiver vessel. The recovered condensate material Isopropanol will then be re-used in the CIP cleaning cycle.
1.5 !<:MISSIONS TO SEWER Mallow Town Cork County Council is the authority responsible for discharges to sewer (domestic) fi·om Buildings I and 2 in the IDA Industrial Estate.
Sanitary waste and canteen waste water streams are piped from Building I to the municipal foul sewer system. The operation in Building I does not include water in the manufacturing process.
There are no sanitary services available in Building 2. Therefore, there are no emissions to sewer for this fl1cility.
Sprinkler water contaminated or potentially contaminated (in the event of sprinkler activation) f1'0m either building will be diverted to the underground storage tank for firewater retention from which it will be transferred to a tanker for ofT-site treatment and disposal.
1.6 EMISSIONS TOW ATER A site map (112142-CV -002-1) has been provided in Attachment 4 of this letter. It is the drainage map showing the locations of Building I m1d Building 2. Surface water from the site will discharge to the IDA Industrial Estate storm water system.
In Building I there is no water used in the manufacturing process. The manufacturing process consists of zinc pigment manufacturing. There would be no discharge to the public trade effluent discharge system.
In Building 2 the CIT for the jacket of the mixing vessel is m1 aqueous mixture of glycol m1d water. This is a closed system and no additional water or materials are required for the jacket. The annual consumption of water consists of adding 25 litres to the vacuum pump every three months, if needed, to replenish the system. This water may be potentially contaminated with isopropanol from the condenser. Any water removed from the process would be sent off-site at
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
an approved waste transfer facility for disposal. There shall be no discharge to the public trade effluent discharge system from Building 2.
Magh nAla will ensure that there are adequate mitigation measures in place (prior to Operational phase) to deal with unplanned events including; • Provision of experienced personnel in the facility and implementation of appropriate training for facility personnel particulmly in areas including; PLC and SCADA operating system, Preventative Maintenance, Safety SOP's. • Implementation of a site specific Environmental management System (EMS) including and Environmental Management Programme (EMP) and Corrective Action Procedures. • Provision of impe1meable Jlooring in areas of the facility associated with the movement, handling and storage of potentially contaminating materials. • Provision of a firewater retention tank which will allow for the collection of potentially contaminated firewater or any spills or leaks to be retained within the site pending sampling and removal oJTsite. • Optimum layout for the storage of process raw materials and finished product in fully contained and bunded storage facilities. • Provision of appropriate bunding for all tank and drum storage areas (intemally) and integrity testing of these (as per the frequency set by the sites fi.1ture licence). Additionally there is a Jloor sump in Building 2 to deal with any local leaks/spills from the system. • Provision and maintenance of appropriate spill response and clean-up equipment in meas where there is a Iisk of spills occulTing.
1.7 PROCESS CHEMICALS STORED ONSITE
The current process in Building I is utilised for zinc pigment manufacturing. There are two processes housed in this facility, wet mill and dry mill. All materials are stored in-house i.e. in IBC containers ( 1,000 litre capacity), drums (220 litre capacity), Bags (22Kg) or Pails (approx. 20 litre capacity). or FIBCs ( 1 MT capacity). The (Industrial Mineral Spirits) IMS raw material supply tank is also located intemally on the zine pigment manufacturing side and is stored in a bunded area. Raw materials fur the above mentioned processes include zinc, lubricant, mineral spirits, and triiron tetraoxide Note the manufacturing Jloor will be designed to act as a form of additional retention fur the facility.
The proposed development project (Building 2) will manufacture organometallic compounds to be used in various markets. These are very stable compounds and a safer alternative than what is currently used in industry. The proposed operation is a batch process, which will be a controlled process under the supervision of an operator. Each batch is maximum 4,000 litres clue to size of equipment. Raw materials will include various solvents, resins and other additives to manufacture compounds. Raw materials will be transferred into a mixing vessel via a pumping station. The entire proposed process is completed in a closed vessel to minimize any releases to atmosphere. In the event of' an emergency, there is a secondary containment available. All materials utilised in the process have been listed in Table G.l (i) as detailed in Attachment 2. All materials are stored in-house i.e. in IBC containers (1,000 litre capacity) or drums (220 litre capacity). There are no additional process materials used in this building.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
All materials used in Buildings I (cu!Tent) and Building (2) mentioned above are stored indoors. There shall be no outside storage of chemicals on this site.
1.8 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
The proposeclliicility does not fall under the provisions of the European Communities (Control of Major Accident Hazards Involving Dangerous Substances) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 74 of 2006) (COMAH Regulations) and regulated by the Irish Health and Safety Authority on the basis that it will not exceed current am1ual threshold limits set clown for zinc powder and the relevant solvents.
The zinc pigments purchased and manu1uctured in Building I are considered and environmental hazard. However. the quantities of these materials, along with any solvents that may also be consiclerecl an environmental hazards will be kept below I 00 MT.
There are no materials used in the proposecllucility (Building 2) that would be stored in quantities close to the threshold listed in the current Seveso III requirements.
The layout of the proposed development separates the distinct manufacturing operations i.e. organometallic compounds and zinc pigment, the related raw materials are stored and processed in defined areas, all equipment within these areas will be ex rated.
Magh nAia will continue to ensure that inventories are managed on an ongoing basis so that thresholds for relevant dangerous substances are not breached in the context of the current Seveso Ill requirements. The facility utilises a computer software system for inventory control. Operators also perfom1 physical counts to conlirm the inventory.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
MAGH rALA, LTIT
ATTACHMENT 2
Table E.l (i) Building 1
Table E.1 (i) Building 2
Table E.l (iv) Building 1
Table G.l (i), Buildings 1 and 2
Table H.3 (i) Buildings 1 and 2
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
Table E.l (i) BOILER EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE (1 Page for each emission point)
Emission Point· ----------- ------Emission Point Ref. Ng: Due to size of boiler, the emissions to atmosphere are not applicable for the process in Building
1. Location:
Grid Ref. (12 digit, 6E,6N):
Vent Details Diameter: I Height above Ground(m):
Date of commencement of emission:
Characteristics of Emission: Boiler rating Steam Output: kg/hr Thermal Input: MW
Boiler fuel Type: Maximum rate at which fuel is burned kg/hr % sulphur content: NOx mg/Nm3
O'C. 3% Oz(Liquid or Gas), 6% O,(Solid Fuel) Maximum volume* of emission m3/hr
O'C 3 % o, (liquid or gas), 6 % Oz (solid fuel) Minimum efflux velocity m.sec-1
Temperature I
'C(max) 'C(min) 'C(avg)
Volume flow limits for emissions to atmosphere shall be based on Normal conditions of temperature and pressure, (i.e. 0°C,101.3kPa), dry gas; 3% oxygen for liquid and gas fuels; 6% oxygen for solid fuels.
(i) Period or periods during which emissions are made, or are to be made, including daily or seasonal variations (start-up/shutdown to be included):
Periods of Emission (avg)
___ .min/hr ___ hr/day ___ day/yr
' I ' I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
Table E.l (i) BOILER EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE (1 Page for each emission point)
Emission Point· Emission Point Ref. N': Due to size of boiler, the emissions to atmosphere are not applicable for the process in Building
2. Location:
Grid Ref. (12 digit, 6E,6N):
Vent Details Diameter: I Height above Ground(m):
Date of commencement of emission:
Characteristics of Emission· Boiler rating Steam Output: kg/hr Thermal Inout: MW
Boiler fuel Type: Maximum rate at which fuel is burned kg/hr % sulohur content: NOx mg/Nm 3
O'C. 3% Oz(Liquid or Gas), 6% Oz(Solid Fuel) Maximum volume* of emission m3/hr
O'C 3 % Oz_(liguid or_gas), 6 % Oz (solid fuel) Minimum efflux velocity m.sec 1
Temperature I
'C(max) 'C(min) 'C(avg)
*Volume flow limits for emissions to atmosphere shall be based on Normal conditions of temperature and pressure, (i.e. 0°C,101.3kPa), dry gas; 3% oxygen for liquid and gas fuels; 6% oxygen for solid fuels.
(i) Period or periods during which emissions are made, or are to be made, including daily or seasonal variations (start-up/shutdown to be included):
Periods of Emission I (avq)
___ min/hr ---hr/day ___ dayjyr
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
A
TABLE E.l(iv): EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE- Minor atmospheric emissions
Emission point Description Emission details1 Abatement system employed
Reference Numbers material mg/Nm kg/h. kg/year 3(2)
Lab Fume Cupboard in VOC Not Not Not None. Very low volume of lab chemicals will
QC Lab (Building 1) monitored monitored monitored be used.
1 The maximum emission should be stated for each material emitted, the concentration should be based on the maximum 30 minute 2 Concentrations should be based on Normal conditions of temperature and pressure, (i.e. 0°C101.3kPa). Wet/dry should be clearly~ sources.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
Table G.l(i) Details of Process related Raw Materials, Intermediates, Products, etc., used or generated on the site
Ref. Material/ CAS Danger<2 l Amount Annual Nature of R< 3 l - Phrase s(3)- Hazard Statement NQ Substance<1l Number Category Stored Usage Use Phrase ( 4)
or Code i (tonnes' tonnes' 1 2-Ethyl-1- 104-76-7 Xn 9.2 110 Production 20-36/37/38 26- H332-H315-H319-
hexanol 36/37/39 H335 2 Acetylacetone 123-54-6 Xn 4.6 55 Production 10-20/21/22 21-23- H226-H302-H311-
24/25 H331 3 1-0ctanol 111-87-5 Xi 9.2 110 Production 36/38 26-36/37 H319 4 1-Butanol 71-36-3 Xn 9.2 110 Production 10-22-37/38- 7/9-13-26- H226-H302-H315-
41-67 37/39-46 H318-H336-H335 5 Isopropyl 67-63-0 F, Xi 9 110 By-product 11-36-37 7-16- H225-H319-H336
Alcohol 24/25-26 6 Metal Various Xi 11 132 Product 10-20-36 16-26- H226-H319-H331
alkoxides 36/37/39 7 Stearic acid 57-11-4 Xi 3 36 Production 38 38 H315 8 Mineral spirits 64742-82-1 Xn 20 90 Production 65-10-66-67- 23-24-61- H226-H336i-H304-
51/53 62 H411 9 Zinc 7440-66-6 N 60 1350 Production 50/53 61-62 H371-H400-H410 10 Triiron 1309-38-2 None 10 45 Production None None H302
tetra oxide Notes: 1. In cases where a material comprises a number of distinct and available dangerous substances, please give details for
each component substance. 2. Article 2(2) of S.I. No. 116/2003. 3. Schedules 9 and 10 of S.I. No. 62/2004 (as amended by S.I. No. 271/2008) 4. EC Regulation 1272/2008 (Chemicals Act 2008 (13 of 2008) and 2010)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
TABLE H.3(i): Generation of waste at the installation and its management
Waste description EWC Code Category per Source of waste Quantity Location of Method of (use asterisk Animal By- generated recovery of recovery or to indicate products (tonnes per disposal (on-site, disposal (e.g.
whether Regulation month) off-site, recycling, energy hazardous 1069/2009 exported) recovery, other
waste or not) incineration, landfill)
Alcohols 07 01 04* Not applicable I Production 11 Off-site Fuel blendinq Waste timber 15 01 03 Not applicable Packaging from raw 0.4 Off-site Recycling pallets materials Empty metal drums 15 01 04 Not applicable Packaging from raw 0.1 Off-site Recycling
materials Waste plastic 15 01 02 Not applicable Packaging from raw 0.1 Off-site Recycling packaging materials Empty packaging 15 01 10* Not applicable Packaging from raw 0.3 Off-site Recycling contaminated with materials residues of dangerous substances Protective clothing 15 02 02* Not applicable Protective clothing used 0.2 Off-site Thermal contaminated with during manufacturing treatment dangerous process substances
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
MAGH nALA, LTD."
ATTACHMENT 3
IP A Air Quality Modelling Report
SCREEN3 Output File
(Updated from original application)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
MAoH rA_LA, LTD"
Assessment of Impact on Air Quality from Use of n-Propanol Solvent Magh nAla, LTD Building 2
Report Updated By:
Corrected Stack Height Information
Mary Kay Heidtke El-lS Engineer Magh nAla, LTD 28 April 2016 Revision B
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
Objective
Detennine the impact on ambient air quality arising from a single vent from Building 2 site that uses n-propanol solvent [CASRN 71-23-8].
Dispersion Model
USEPA SCREEN3 is a single source Gaussian pltm1e model which provides maximum ground-level concentrations lor point, area, flare, and volume sources. SCREEN3 is a screening version of the ISC3 model.
This report has been corrected from the original report. Stack height infonnation was updated for the proposed facility (Building 2).
Modelling Inputs and Assumptions
1. n-Propanol is the sole constituent of the emission that requires impact assessment. 2. Then-Propanol emission of27.2kg/d is assumed to be steady state (worst case scenario) over a 24 hom period. No shorttem1 emission peaks occur so that the daily output is calculated to an emission rate of 0.31 g/s. 3. Minimum exit velocity is assumed to simulate minimum momentum velocity (worst case dispersion scenario) 4. Minimum stack temperature is assumed to simulate minimum buoyancy momentum (worst case dispersion scenario). 5. Background levels ofn-Propanol arising !rom other sources (if they exist) are not considered. 6. The model inputs for the SCREEN3 software are:
- n-Propanol emission at peak equals 27.2kg/d- (0.31 g/s) - Stack height (m) 11m - Stack inside diameter (m) 0.15m -Stack gas exit velocity (m/s) 6.8 to 38.37 m/S or flow rate (ft3/min or m3/s) 0.0139 to
0.078 m3/S - Stack gas temperature (K) 20 Deg C to 80 Deg C -Ambient temperature (K) (use default of293K if not known) - Urbanln1ral option (U =urban, R =rural) Urban
7. USEP A SCREEN3 was used to predict the worst case 1 hour Ground Level Concentrations (GLC) that will result Ji·om the operation of then-Propanol emission point (Emission Point B). The SCREEN3 model options included: simple tenain, no building wake and full meterology. The model output file is provided below.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
Impact Assessment
Impact ofn-propanal a from single source at Building 2.
Emission Total Emission Maximum 1 hr GLC Downwind distance Environmental scenario (g/s) (f.lg/m3) to location of
••
Assessment maximum. GLC (m) . Level (~-tg/m3)
I 0.31 337.6 49 738,000
Note: The Environmental Assessment Level (EAL) for n-Propanol is based on 3 times the HSA 8 hour Occupational Exposure Limit!. The practice of deriving EAL's from Occupational Exposure Limits is recommended for ce1iain chemical species in the EPA guidance note on dispersion modelling2 and the Environment Agency of England and Wales guidance on the same topic3. The 8 hour OEL for nPropanol is I 00 ppm (246,000 ug/m3 ).
Conclusion
The results using the corrected stack height and diameter are similar to the original model. The predicted ground level concentrations of n-Propanol are substantially below the Environmental Assessment Level. No further assessment of impact is necessary.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
SCREEN3 Model at T1 R1 corrected stack Dimensions
t.--1.-t.- SCREEN3 MODEL RUN VERSION DATED 13043
Building 2
SIMPLE TERRAIN INPUTS: SOURCE TYPE = EMISSION RATE (G/S) = STACI( HEIGHT (M) = STK INSIDE DIAM (M) STK EXIT VELOCITY (M/S)= STK GAS EXIT TEMP (K) = AMBIENT AIR TEMP (K) RECEPTOR HEIGHT (M) URBAN/RURAL OPTION = BUILDING HEIGHT (M) MIN HORIZ BLDG DIM (M) = MAX HDRIZ BLDG DIM (M)
POINT 0.310000 11.0000 0.1500 6.8000
293.0000 293.0000
1. 5000 URBAN
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
THE REGULATORY (DEFAULT) MIXING I·IEIGHT OPTION WAS SELECTED.
04/28/16 08:30:31
THE REGULATORY (DEFAULT) ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OF 10.0 METERS WAS ENTERED.
BUOY. FLUX= 0.000 M**4/S'"'3; MOM. FLUX= 0.260 M*''4/S**2.
*'"' FULL METEOROLOGY ''**
********************************** ''** SCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES *** *************~**~*****************
*''* TERRAIN HEIGHT OF 0. M ABOVE STACK BASE USED FOR
DIST CONC U10M USTK MIX HT PLUME (M) (UG/M*''3) STAB (M/S) (M/S) (M) HT (M)
------- ---------- ------ ------10. 0.2217 2 5. 0 5.1 1600.0 11.56
100. 265.9 4 1.0 1.0 320.0 13.99 200. 197.2 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 13.92 300. 120.6 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 13.92 400. 79.60 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 13.92 500. 56.73 6 1.0 1. 0 10000.0 13.92 600. 42.85 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 13.92 700. 33.78 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 13.92 800. 27.52 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 13.92 900. 23.00 6 1.0 1.0 10000.0 13.92
1000. 19.62 6 1.0 1. 0 10000.0 13.92
MAXIMUM 1-HR CONCENTRATION AT OR BEYOND 10. M: 49. 337.6 3 1.0 1.0 320.0 14.00
DWASH= DWASH=NO DWASH=HS DWASH=SS DWASH=NA
MEANS MEANS MEANS MEANS MEANS
NO CALC MADE (CONC = 0.0) NO BUILDING DOWNWASH USED HUBER-SNYDER DOWNWASH USED SCHULMAN-SCIRE DOWNWASH USED DOWNWASH NOT APPLICABLE, Xd '' LB
******************************************** * ,, SUMMARY OF TERRAIN HEIGHTS ENTERED FOR
SIMPLE ELEVATED TERRAIN PROCEDURE * ********************************************
Page 1
FOLLOWING
SIGMA y (M)
------3.20
15.71 21.19 31.19 40.86 50.21 59.28 68.06 76.60 84.90 92.97
10.93
DISTANCES ***
SIGMA Z (M) DWASH
------2.42 NO
13.82 ND 14.06 NO 19.95 NO 25.31 NO 30.25 NO 34.83 NO 39.12 NO 43.16 NO 46.98 NO 50.60 ND
10.04 NO
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
TERRAIN HT (M)
0.
SCREEN3 Model at Tl Rl corrected stack Dirnensions
DISTANCE RANGE (M) MINIMUM MAXIMUM
10. 1000.
**********~****************************
'"''' SUMMARY OF SCREEN MODEL RESULTS **'' ***************************************
CALCULATION PROCEDURE
SIMPLE TERRAIN
MAX CONC (UG/W'''3)
337.6
DIST TO MAX (M)
49.
TERRAIN HT (M)
0.
*************************************************** ** REMEMBER TO INCLUDE BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS *'' ***************************************************
Page Z
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
MAGH nALA, LTD."
ATTACHMENT 4
Drainage Map 112142-CV-002-1
(Submitted with original application)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:35
' I ,_ :s 2
II " II
' .,. ' ' !
!q
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
MAoH nALA, LTD."
ATTACHMENT 5
Updated Baseline Report Building 1 and 2
Revision B
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
Our Ref: JMcH/ P15136
271h November, 2015
Messrs. DPS Engineering and Construction Ltd.
4 Eastgate,
Little Island,
Co. Cork.
priority geotechnical
Re: Magh Nala Ltd Building- Main Site- Environmental Baseline Assessment
for IPPC License, Final Report
In September, 2015, Priority Geotechnical were requested by DPS Engineering and
Construction to undertake environmental soil and groundwater sampling at a site
adjacent to Mallow Accident Repair Centre in the Lower Quartertown Industrial Estate,
Mallow, Co. Cork.
The site is located to the west of a rail line and the N20. To the north of the site is a
residential development and north of this is a road identified as the R619. To the south
is further commercial/industrial developments and to the west is undeveloped greenfield
sites.
The Geological Survey of Ireland, 1:100,000 mapping (Sheet 21) indicated that the
geology of the area was characterised by the Waulsortian Limestone Formation (WA)
described as massive unbedded Limestone and Mudstone. Directly to the north of the
site is Copstown Limestone Formation (CT) described as dark grey well bedded muddy
limestone. Teagasc sub-soil mapping indicated the superficial deposits in the area were
characterised by Alluvium in the vicinity of the River Blackwater, Made ground and
Glacial deposits chiefly derived from Devonian Sandstones.
P15136_F01 1 of 4
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
The works were undertaken between the 291h September and 01 51 October 2015, using
the PGL's Dando 2000 cable percussive drilling rig. The fieldwork was carried out in
general accordance with BS 5930 (1999) Code of Practice for Site Investigation and Part
9 of BS 1377 (1990), Method of Tests for Soil for Civil Engineering Purposes, in situ
Tests and BS10175: 2001, Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Site - Code of
Practice. The records provide descriptions, in accordance with BS 5930 (1999) +A2:
2010, of the materials encountered and details of the samples taken, together with any
observations made during the fieldworks
The subsequent sections should be read in conjunction with the logs and laboratory test
data accompanying this report.
A total of six (6) cable percussive boreholes (BH01, BH02, BH03, BH04, BH05 and
BH06) were undertaken to depths of 5.30m below existing ground level (bgl) to 8.00m
bgl. The locations are provided as indicative only below. Groundwater well installations
were constructed at boreholes; BH01, BH02, BH03, BH05 and BH06.
P15136_F01
I E\HD1
'.®
® BHD6
® 81-103 BHOtj
--· ® ®' '
BH04
® BH02
2 of 4
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
A total number of twenty nine (29) bulk samples (B) were recovered. A total of sixteen
(16) number environmental samples (ES) were recovered in general accordance with
the preparation for and methods of taking samples, together with their size, preservation
and handling was in accordance with British Standard BS 5930: 1981 -Code of Practice
for Site investigation, the BS10175:2001 Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites
- Code of Practice, the contract documents and the Association of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) guide to environmental sampling, September,
2010.
All samples were transported to Priority Geotechnical's laboratory in Midleton, Co. Cork
examined and subsequently dispatched to Chemtest for environmental analysis.
Specialist testing was carried out by Chemtest Laboratories on behalf of PGL. The
laboratory test results accompany this report.
On the 121h November, 2015, after purging the well to ensure representative samples
were recovered, appropriate groundwater samples were taken from the 50mm diameter
standpipe well installations at locations: BH01, BH02, BH03 and BH06, in accordance
with best practice. Groundwater was also monitoring undertaken and is summarised as
follows;
Exploratory Hole ID Depth to Well Base (m bgl) Groundwater Level (m bgl)
BH01 4.47 3.82
BH02 4.30 4.34
BH03 7.13 2.90
BH04 No standpipe installed
BH05 3.10 Dry
BH06 5.07 3.85
The ground conditions encountered comprised intermixed glacial and alluvial deposits of
CLAY, SAND and GRAVEL to depths >8.0m bgl. No bedrock was encountered during
the investigation. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the boreholes during the
fieldworks where the casing may cut-off low volume flow in cohesive deposits. However
groundwater monitoring installations were constructed as detailed above and on the
exploratory borehole logs.
P15136_F01 3 of 4
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
The environmental soil samples recovered from depths 1.0m bgl to 6.0m bgl were
analysed for;
asbestos, metals, volatile organic compounds (VOC), semi volatile organic
compounds (SVOC), Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHn), total phenols, total petroleum hydrocarbons Criteria
Working Group (TPH CWG), Benzene, Toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes
(BTEX) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
All soil determinands analysed were screened against either UK Soil Guideline Values
(SGVs) or generic assessment criteria for a commercial land use scenario. All soil
concentration values were below the assessment criteria values. No asbestos was
detected.
Groundwater samples recovered were analysed and the results screened against
Environmental Quality Standards as per the Environmental Protection Agency's Report
entitled Parameters of Water Quality Interpretation and Standards.
The majority of parameters were below the limit of detection. Chromium, arsenic, boron,
nitrate, cadmium, nickel, lead, chloride, nitrate and ammonium were all slightly above the
limit of detection but were significantly below their relevant Drinking Water Directive
98/83/EC limit.
Should you have any queries in relation to the data collected, please do not hesitate to
contact our office.
Yours sincerely, For Priority Geotechnical,
r; v
Jacqueline McHugh CEng MCIWEM Senior Geoenvironmental Engineer
P15136_F01 4 of 4
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
KEY TO SYMBOLS ON EXPLORATORY HOLE RECORDS
All linear dimensions are in metres or miHimetres
DESCRIPTIONS
Friable
SAMPLES
U{) U( )F, U( )P
U38
P(F). (P)
B
D
w CBR ES
Drillers Description
Easily crumbled
Undisturbed 102mm diameter sample, ( ) denotes number of blows to drive sampler
F- not recovered, P-partially recovered
Undisturbed 38mm diameter sample
Piston sample- disturbed
Bulk sample- disturbed
Jar Sample- disturbed
Water Sample
California Bearing Ratio mould sample
Chemical Sample for Contamination Analysis
SPTLS Standard Penetration TestS lump sample from split sampler
CORE RECOVERY AND ROCK QUALITY
TCR SCR RQD
Total Core Recovery(% of Core Run)
Solid Core Recovery (length of core having at least one full diameter as% of core run)
Rock Quality Designation (length of solid core greater than 100mm as% of core run)
Where there is insufficient space for the TCR, SCR and RQD, the results may be found in the remarks column
If Fracture Spacing in mm (Minimum/Average/Maximum) Nl- non intact, NR- no recovery
AZCL
Nl
GROUNDWATER
v
Date/Water
IN SITU TESTING
s c sw lvp, HVp (R) KIF), (C), {R).{P) ~
HP
Assumed Zone of Core Loss
Non intact
Groundwater strike
Groundwater level after standing period
Date of shift (day/month)/Depth to water at end of previous shift shown above the date
and depth to water at beginning of shift given below the date
Stundard Penetration Test- split barrel sampler
Stand;Jrd Penetrution Test- solid 60° cone
Self Weight Penetmtion
In Situ Vane Test, Hand Vane Test (R) demonstrates remoulded strength
Permeubility Test
Hand Penetrometer Test
MEASURED PROPERTIES
N Stundard Penetration Test- blows required to drive 300mm after seating drive
4v '11."'/y
CBR
Denotes x blows for y mm within the Standard Penetration Test
Denotes x blows for y mm within the seating drive
Undrained Shear Strength (kN/m2)
California Bearing Ratio
ROTARY DRILLING SIZES
Index Letter
N
H
p
s
Nominal Diameter (mm)
Borehole
75
99 120 146
Core
54 76
92 113
Key Sheet
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
Priority Geotechnical Ltd. Tel: 021 4631600 Fax: 021 4638690
www.prioritygeotechnical.ie
Magh Nala Building 1 & 2
Mallow
DPS Engineering
1.00 ES
1.20-2.00
2.00
3.00-4.00
4.00 4.00- 5.00
B
ES
B
ES B
Depth (m)
0.30
1.20
2.00
3.00
5.30
Groundwater: I Information:
Struck(m) Ro~a IP Attar (rnrns) Ccrnme~t
Nono cncmmleFe~ Hale Depth (m)
5 30
terminated at 5.30m bgt due to hard stratum. Refer to chiseling records. (Gco:md:wo:ll<>e installation constructed. Response zone 1 .90m bgl to 5.3Dm bgl.
Hole D1a (mm)
'" Dando 200
0111012015 0111012015
Stratum Descriptlon
Gravel is medium to
Casing D1a {mm)
'"' Depth Top Depth Base
1.90 2.00 5 25 S.JO
Duration 00 JQ at·aa
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
Priority Geotechnical Ltd. Tel: 021 4631600 Fax: 021 4638690
www.prioritygeotechnical.ie
Drilled By: PC
Logged By:
JM
Borehole No.
BH02 Sheet1 of 1
Project Name: Magh Nala Building 1 & 2 Hole Type
CP
Location: Mallow
Client: DPS Engineering
Sample and In Situ Testing
Depth (m) Type
0.30-1.20 B
Groundwater:
1.00
1.20-2.00
2.00 2.00- 3.00
3.00- 4.00
4.00
5.00- 6.00
6.00
Struck (m) RosD to Almr (rnms)
IB<>COI"Iil ;tecm•loatod at 6.50m bg!.
ES B
ES 8
8
ES
8
ES
Sealed
Results
Comment tlcne er~counle!ed
Depth (m)
0.30
1.20
3.00
6.15
Level (m)
Date: 30/09/2015 30/09/2015
Stratum Description Legend I ~(~MADE~~~G~co"t--------~~
. (MADE ) Cloo>e 804oggcog"""b-bo>e.
, -;::·:c,' bcowo gcoy •lightly ""''· •lightly ,. gravelly l._LKY with low cobble content. Sand is fine I ,. coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse and sub-angular.
·· Cobbles are sub-rounded to angular.
~·.·''
'-"'"'-;c:
·'-'"':·. '-0-.
:=s:i '-'"'--
,_
,_
:-
,-
.-
-
Hole Information: Chiselling:
Hole Depth (rn) fi.15
Hole Pta (mm) 200
Dando 2000
I shift Data:
Cnsing Pia (mm)
'" Depth Top
2.45 ,, ,, Depth Ba~c
2.60 J.go 6.15
Dum lion
"" "" 01:00
Hole ~~th (rn) 30109;~~~ 00.00 JOI09r.1015 17 00
Tool CMir;el Cl1ioel. CIIISCI.
s~a~~~:~~n €n!lofol!!n
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
priority !JPU11'1huuol
Priority Geotechnical Ltd. Tel: 021 4631600 Fax: 021 4638690
www.prioritygeotechnlcal.le
Project Name: Magh Nala Building 1 & 2
Location:
Groundwater:
Mallow
DPS Engineering
1.00
1.20- 2.00
2.00 2.00- 3.00
ES B
ES B
3.00- 4.00 B
4.00 ES 4.00- 5.00 B
5.00- 6.00 B
6.00 6.00- 7.00
ES B
7.00-8.00 B
Strud: (m) l~ose to After (m1ns) Sualed Commont fJon~ encour.le•eO
Depth (m)
1.00
2.00
6,00
B.OD
level (m)
Legend
Information:
Hole Depth (m) 6GO
Hole Dia (mm) 2DO
Dando 2000
It terminated at B.Om bgl. Groundwater installation constructed. Response zone bgl\o 6.50m bgl.
24/09/2015 24/09/2015
Stratum Description
Chiselling:
Casing Ora (mm) Depth Top Depth Base Durntion Tool
'"'
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
~ Priority Geotechnical Ltd. Drilled By: Borehole No.
~H:. 'tt; ir..~!,~.~.:!!Y Tel: 021 4631600 PC BH04 Fax:: 021 4638690 Logged By:
www.prioritygeotechnical.ie DMC Sheel 1 of 1
Project Name: Magh Nala Building 1 & 2 1:~;~;~ No. Hole Type
CP
Location: Mallow Level: Scale 1;50
Client: DPS Engineering Date: 2510912015 - 25/09/2015
Well Water Sample and In Situ Testing Depth Level
Legend Stratum Description Strikes Deplh (m) , Type Resulls (m) (m)
~~~~l~cks. ) hll ""';'" " .
-
-
1.30 End of BoreiHIIe nl1.30m
-
-
,_
,_
;-
;-
!
-
-
-
-
,_
Groundwater: Hole Information: I :
Struck (m} Ros!.' to After(mino) Sealed Comment Hole Depth (m) Hole Dia (mm) Ca~ing Dia (mm) Depth Top Depth Base Duration Tool None encountered uo 20(} '"' uo 1.30 01 (}(}
Doodo 2000
!Shift Data: '" 25109,;~;~ 00 00 Hola ~.C:Oth (m) S~a~~~~~n
jsoreholc terminated at 1.30m bgl. '" :05/0912015 17 00 1.30 End of u111n
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
~ Priority Geotechnical Ltd. Drilled By: Borehole No.
Tel: 021 4631600 PC BH05 ~!:~~,~!!Y Fax: 021 4638690 Logged By: www.prloritygeotechnical.le JM Sheet1 of 1
Project Name: Magh NaJa Building 1 & 2 ~~~;~;~No. Cowards: Hole Type
CP
Location: Mallow Level: s,~;~·
lcuent: DPS Engineering Date: 25/09/2015 " 25/09/2015
Well ! Water Sample and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description
: ""'"", Deplh (m) Type Results (m) (m)
0.00. 1.20 B \f';,~~o~ cobble cjn~;~~;n~nr~~~f;~s~r~~~~~~e~~e ~~nd coarse. Gravel is coarse and angular. Cobbles are angular to tabular and of limestone lithology.
,_ 1.20-2.00 8 1.20
~;~~',: ~"~~ ~~~~i~mgr~elly, .'"'~"Y fine to i Gravel is fine to medium,
··=",=.:.~ angular to sub-angular.
:.="'=.:.~ 2.00 ES ~~
. ,_ 2.00- 3.00 8
<"::;;.; ... :
··="<·.:., 3.00 ES 3,00
:, :'\ ~~~~~~ ~:~~~ ~R;~d~~~ ~~~ds~b~~:u~0d~de~~u:b-1-
3.00- 3.60 8
:;-::,·: angular.
3.65 """' '
-
;-
;-
-
,_
'-
Groundwater: I Hole Information; Chiselling: Struck (m) Ro~c to After(m1ns) Scaled Comment Hole Depth (m) Hole D•a (mm) ca~ing D1a (mm) Oopth Top Depth Base Dur.~ticn Too!
/Jan" cr1onunlcmd J 65 ;mo '"' 2.95 '" 00 30 Cl•met :l.60 3.€5 01"00 en met
Equipment: Dando 2000
Shift Data: '" 2E/09~:~~ 07 00
Halo ~.:th (m) S~ac~":,~~~~n
Borehole tenninated at 3.65m bgl. "" 2~10912015 17 00 3.65 End or ~tHn
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
~ Priority Geotechnical Ltd. Drilled By: Borehole No.
Tel: 021 4631600 PC BH06 priority Fax: 021 4638690 Logged By: ~··ulollonH''l
www.priorltygeotechnical.ie JM Sheet 1 of 1
Project Name: Magh Nala Building 1 & 2 1:~;~;~ No. : CP
Scale Location: Mallow Level: 1:50
Client DPS Engineering Date: 29/09/2015 - 29/09/2015
Wetl ':'Vater Sam pte and tn Situ Te;ting Depth Level Legend Stratum Description
. Depth (m) Tvoe Re;otls (m) (m)
0.00-1.20 8
~~~:~ ""'·'~-~·~~~J'::;~~t ClA':_~':;':~?,~,~od '""''' wllh rootlets) fine to . lis medium to
~=::::'"' coarse and sub-rounded. -
~-'::::-'::
1.00 ES :'t=~~ -:..c;:: ' 1.20-2.00 B 1.20 ,::::-:;::::;: g~~{~;b_mwn _mollle_o gcey , .'.'"-'Y
th pockets of grey fin SAND. Gravel is fine to :: _c:;:: -C~C medium and sub-rounded.
: ~=:':;_::=;: -2.00 ES 2.00 ::;:'7:-;: ~8o~~;~~~~- I Gravel is fi~ea~u _or~v,r~ sli?ll~ly ~~~~e11~y, -·:·'.:
2.00- 3.00 B ;::=:=~
••••
fine to coarse.
~=-~ < ~=::::=-:; .
•••• ••••• 3.00. 4.00 B '"~"'=···:,
-
> '"-- .. , .... ':·:·.
;~3~2 .··· '"= .. :;-' '• ..
4.00 ES ~~2~~ .-
,; 4.00" 5.00 B
'•
~~~3 "
: :;-':::: -'~-i-
-·:·:·- 5.00 B 5.00
•••• I
-::·.
6.00 ES -
""" "'""'"""'" "' "·"'"
-
-
-
-
Groundwater: Hole Information: tt :
Struck (m) Rose to Aller (mon~) se~led Comment Hole Depth (m) Hole Dia (mm) Casing Dia (mm) Depth Top Depth Ba~o Duration Tool Rolar to oh1lt data "'" '"" 200 3.15 J.J(! 00 30 Chioel
4.ZO 4.35 0000 Chtod
Equipment: Dando 2000 6.00 "'" 01 00 C!u~el
Shift Data: '" 21!103..;0~~ 03 00 Hole ~-~th (m) S~aen";,~~.~fl
'" 29/Q~/2015 17 00 6.10 End o/ sh.n B~r_::hole _terminated at 6.10m bgt Groundwater installation constructed. Response zone
.10m bgl to 5.70rn bgl.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
KEY TO SYMBOLS - LABORATORY TEST RESULT
u p TWS B D w pH so, S03
+ Cl PI <425 LL PL MC NP Yb Yd Ps U/D UIC TIM 100138 REM TST v DSB RSB RS a, cr 1-o3
c c_ ~ <I>_ Ef
# 1#1 p_o m, c, Opt Nat Std Hvy Vib CBR Satm.c. MCV
l<ey sheet
Undisturbed Sample Piston Sample Thin Wall Sample Bull< Sample- Disturbed Jar Sample- Disturbed Water Sample Acidity/Alkalinity Index % -Total Sulphate Content (acid soluble) g/ltr- Water Soluble Sulphate (Water or 2:1 Aqueous Soil Extract) Calcareous Reaction Chloride Content Plasticity Index % of material in sample passing 425 micron sieve Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Water Content Non Plastic Bull< Density Dry Density Particle Density Undrained/Drained Triaxial Unconsolidated/Consolidated Triaxial Single Stage/Multistage Triaxial Sample Diameter (mm) Remoulded Triaxial Test Specimen Triaxial Suction Test Vane Test Drained Shear Box Residual Shear Box Ring Shear Cell Pressure Deviator Stress Cohesion Effective Cohesion Intercept Angle of Shearing Resistance - Degrees Effective Angle of Shearing Resistance Strain at Failure Failed under 1 "'Load Failed under 2"u Load Untestable Excessive Strain Effective Overburden Pressure Coefficient of Volume Decrease Coefficient of Consolidation Optimum Natural Standard Compaction - 2.5kg Rammer Heavy Compaction- 4.51<g Rammer Vibratory Compaction California Bearing Ratio Saturation Moisture Content Moisture Condition Value
I~ CBR) I§ CBR)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
Final Report
Report No.:
Initial Date of Issue:
Client
Client Address:
Contact(s):
Project
Quotation No.:
Order No.:
15-23298-1
09-0ct-2015
Priority Geotechnical Ltd
Unit 12 Owenacurra Business Park Midleton County Cork Ireland
Colette Kelly
P15136- Magh Nala Building 1 & 2
No. of Samples: 16
Turnaround (Wkdays): 5
Date Approved: 09-0ct-2015
Approved By:
Details: Darrell Hall, Laboratory Director
Page 1 of 6
Tl1e nght chemistry to deliver results
Chern test Ltd.
Date Received:
Date Instructed:
Target Date:
Results Due:
Depot Road Newmarket
CBBOAL Tel: 01638 606070
Email: [email protected]
06-0ct-2015
05-0ct-2015
09-0ct-2015
09-0ct-2015
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
~ ~1ntest The nght cht:m•slry to do! rver results
iect: P15136- Magh Nala Building 1 & 2 !Client: Priority Geotechnica_!_~-~- ;tJob No.:
No ..
IACMType
Identification
IPH !Boron (Hot Water Soluble)
!Cyanide
!Cyanide (Free)
Cyanide (Total)
Arsen
Copper
jMercury
I Nickel [Lead
Zinc . : TPH >C5-C6
[Aliphatic TPH >CS-CB 1 >C8-C10 1 >C10-C12 1 >C12-C16 1 >C16-C21
Total Alip
ITo~ fj'Qt,
"'>CS-C 1 >C7-C8 ---·
; >C8-C10 i >C1n.
i >C
i >C ·:TPH>C
: TPH >C35-C44
-
t Sample I D.: I 201712 Client Sample Ref.-
Client Sample I D. BH1 Sample Type SOIL
Top Depth (m)· .00 Bottom Depth {m)
Date Sampled. I 01-0ct-2015
I Accred. LCD I U N/A -u 2192 N/A I No Asbestos
Detected
N 12030 I % I 0.020 N/A
0.40 u 0.50
_u_[23oo 1 molko 1 o.5o u I 23oo I molko I o.5o
2450 mglkg 150 mg/kg I 0.10 ~50 1.0 ~50 0.50
u 1 24561mo/kg 1 o.1 o u 1 24so 1 mg/ko 1 o.5o
2450 mg 2450 mg
2450 I mg 2680 mg 2680 mg
2660 mg/kg U 2660 mglkg 1.0 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0
2680 mg/kg 2680 mg/kg 2680 mglkg 1 ~
N 2680 mgtkg
N 2660 mglk\!.[_1,0 U 2680 mgfl~g I 1.0
2680 mgfkg 2680 mgfkg 2680 mgtkg
2680 mglkg N 2680 mgfkg 1.0 U 2660 mg/kg 5.0 U 2660 mg/kg 10 U 2700 mg/kg 0.10
19 8.
< 0.4C < 0.5C < 0.50 < 0.50
15 0.20 29 27
< 0.10 35 32
< 0.20
< '· <
< <
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
< 1.0 < 5.0 <10
< 0.10
Results -Soil
15-23298 201713
BH1 SOIL
2.00
201714
BH1 SOIL 4.00
15-23296 201715
BH2 SOIL
.00
15-23298 201716
BH2 sOIL 2.00
201717
BH2 SOIL
4.00
11-0ct-2015 115 I 30-Sep-2015
--No Asbestos
Detected
16 8.
<
<' < 0.50 < 0.50
16
< 0.10 51 22
< 0.20
< <
<
< 1.0 < 1. < 1.0 < 1.
< 1.
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
<
< 1.0 < 5.0 <10
< 0.10
-No Asbestos I No Asbestos
Detected Detected
10
< 0.40 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
16 0.37
< 0.10 43 16
< 0.20
< '· <
< < <
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1. <
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
< <
< 5.0 < 10
< 0.10
11 8.
< 0.40 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
16 .34
< 0.10 39 17
<D.
< <
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1. <
<
< < 1.0 < 5.0 <10
< 0.10
Page 2 of 6
-No Asbestos I No Asbestos
Detected Detected 16
< 0.40 < 0.50 < 6.50 < 0.2Q_
< 0.10 4!
.3! < 0.20
<
<
< 1.0
~ ~
< 1.0
< 1.0
~ < 1.0
__::.1 <
<
< 6.7
< 1.0 7.4 29
< 0.10
16 B.
< <
<•
< 0.50 18
8.5' 30 40
< 0.10 55 24
< 0.20
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <
<
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
<
< 1.0 < 5.0 < 10
< 0.10
201718
BH2 SOIL
6.60
-No Asbestos
Detected
16 8.3
< 0.40 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
16 1.62
36 < 0.10
54 2·
< 0.
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
<
< 1.0 --:?1.0
< •. <
<
< < 1.0 < 1.0 < 5.0 < 10
--:?(jTo
201719
BH3 SOIL
1.00
-
14
< 0.40 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
19 0.44
< 0.10 55 27
< 0.20
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1. <
<
< < 1.
< 5.0 < 10
< 0.10
115
15-23296 201720
BH3 SOIL
2.00
•15
-No Asbestos
Detected
13
< 0.40 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
16 0.42 26 36
< 0.10 51 23
< 0.20
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1. <
<
<
< 1.0 < 5.0 < 10
< 0.1C
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
fJC test Results -Soil ihe ngl<t CllCmlstry to dolrver results
Project: P15136- Maqh Nala Building 1 & 2 -Client: Priority Geotechnical Ltd Ch'erritest Job No.: 15~23298 15-23298 15-23298 15-23298 15-23298 15-23298--c r 15-23298 15-23298 I 15-23298
Quotation No. Chern test Sample 10.: 201712 201713 201714 201715 201716 201717 201718 201719 201720 Order No.: Client Sample Ref.:
Client Sample 10.: BH1 BH1 BH1 BH2 BH2 BH2 BH2 BH3 BH3
Sample Type: SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL Top Depth (m): 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 6.60 1.00 2.00
Bottom Depth (m):
Date Sampled: 01-0ct-2015 01-0ct-2015 01-0ct-2015 30-Sep-2015 30-Sep-2015 30-Sep-2015 30-Sep-2015 24-Sep-2015 24-Sep-2015
Determinand -- .... Accred. SOP Units LOD · ...• .....•... · .. • I
--c .·. --c --c-:-Acenaphthylene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Acenaphthene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Fluorene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Phenanthrene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Anthracene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Fluoranthene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Pyrene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[a anthracene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Chrysene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[bJfluoranthene u 2700 mgfkg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo{k]fluoranthene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[a]pyrene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
lndeno{ 1 ,2,3-c,d)Pyrene u 2700 mgfkg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Dibenz{ a, h)Anthracene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[g,h,! perylene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Coronene N 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Total Of 17 PAH's N 2700 mg/kg 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0
PCB28 u 2810 mg/kg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 52 u 2815 mg/l(g 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 101 u 2815 mg/kg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 118 u 2815 mg/kg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 153 u 2815 mg/kg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 138 u 2815 mgfkg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 180 u 2810 mg/kg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
Total PCBs {7 Congeners) N 2815 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
T a tal Phenols u 2920 mg/kg 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 -
Page 3 of6
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
~ mtest The ngt1t chemls\ry to dOI<'JOf rosul;s
iect: P15136- Magh Nala jCiie:_~J:F:_riority Geotechnical Ltd
ion No.·
[Order No.
1 & 2 ,bNo.
Chemtest Sample I D.: Client Sample Ref.:
Client Sample 10 ..
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m). Bottom Depth (m)
Date
201721
BH3 SOIL 4.00
d I Accred. SOP I Units )0 I IACM Type
I Asbestos Identification
loH !Boron (Hot Water Soluble)
(Complex) (Free
Total IArse1 ·
Copper
!Mercury
!Nickel
I Lead
~ ~..,;;c TPH >C5-C6
c TPH >C6-C8 c TPH >C8-C10 lc TPH >C10-C12 ic TPH >C12-C16 ic TPH >C16-C21 ·c TPH >C21-' c TPH >r':':l.~>-·
~To~t=:,ai:';A"'Ii'='oh='a:7:ti
!Total
c TPH >(
ic TPH >C7-C8 ·c TPH >C8-C10
i >C12-C16 H >C16-C21 H >C21-C35 H ,,
u 2192 </A
u 2192 N/A No
N 12030 1----.y;-fW U 2010 N/A U mg/kg
2300
mg/kg mg/kg
0.10
U 2450 mg/kg I 1.0 U 2450 mQ/kq
I mg/kg I mg/kg I mg/k~ I mg/k~ mgikQf0.50
N 2680 mg/kg_J. 1.0 N 2680 mg/kg
2680 mg/kg 1.0 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 u 2680 mg/kg 1.0 U 2680 mglkg N 2680 mg/kg U 2680 mg/kg !
N 2680 mg/kg i
N T 2680 mg/kg 1:0 U T2680 mg/kg 1.0
u J2680 ~
~ mg/kg
mglkg 1.0 mglkg 1.0
U 2680 mglkg 5.0 U 2680 mg/kg 10
U 2700 mg/kg 0.10
17 8.4
< 0.40
<
<
<
0.13
17
<
<
54 < 1.0 < 1. <
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 ~
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0
< < <
< < 1.0 < 5.0 < 10
< 0.10
Results - Soil
15-23298 15-23298 201722 201723 201726
BH5 son 2.00
..... ,)15
-
16 8.4
< 0.40 < 0.50 <D. <
0.
<
<
28 37
86 < 1.0 < 1.0
< <
< 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0
< 1. <
<
< 1.0 < 1.0
< 1. <
<
< <
< 5.0 < 10
< 0.10
BHS I BH6 SOIL I SOIL 3.oo I 1.oo
--'""---)15
I No
13
8.5 < 0.40
< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
10 0.30 19 23
< 0.10
<
52 < 1.[
< 1. < 1 < 1
< 1 < 1.0 < 1. < 1.
< 5. <
< 1 < 1.
< 1. <
<
<
< < 5.0 <10
< 0.10
\ No Ast Detected
18 7.8
< 0.4{
< <
<
0.28
23
< 0.10
< 0.20 54
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 <
< < < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1. <
<
< < 1.0
< 1.0 < 5.0 <10
< 0.10
Page 4 of6
Fa
BH6 SOIL
2.00
15 8.0
< 0.40 < <
<
0.18
26
<
< 0.20 59
< 1.0 <
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
< 1. < 5. < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1. <
<
<
<
< 1.0
< 5.0 < 10
< 0.10
BH6 son 4.00
-
Fa 16 7.7
< 0.40 < 0.50 < <
(
<
<
30 37
83 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1. < 5. < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0 <1.
< < < <
< 5.0 < 10
< 0.10
15-23298
BH6 SOH 6.00
_, . ., ... , _ _,,)15
!No 14 8.2
< 0.40 <
<
<
0.23
25
--<
< 0.20
67 < 1.0
""71.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 1.0
< 1. <
<
<
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.
<
<
<
< 1.0
"""""<"1.0 < 5.0 < 10
-;;;-o.;o
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
~ n1test Results -Soil Tloe ngh\ chem1stry to cJolrvor results
Proiect: P15136- Maqh Nala Building 1 & 2 -Client: Priority Geotechnical Ltd .. Chern test Job No.: 15-23298 15-23298 15-23298 15-23298 15-23298 15~23298 15-23298 Quotation No. Chern test Sample 10.: 201721 201722 201723 201724 201725 201726 201727 Order No. Client Sample Ref ..
Client Sample I D.: BH3 BH5 BH5 BH6 BH6 BH6 BH6 Sample Type· SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
Top Depth (m): 4.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 Bottom Depth {m):
Date Sampled: 24~Sep-2015 25-Sep-2015 28-Sep-2015 29-Sep-2015 29-Sep-2015 29-Sep-2015 29-Sep-20 15 Detenninand Accred. SOP Units LOD ... . ·· . .. -c Acenaphthylene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Acenaphthene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Fluorene u 2700 mg/l1g 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Phenanthrene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Anthracene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Fluoranthene u 2700 mgfkg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Pyrene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[ajanthracene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Chrysene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[b]fluoranthene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[k]fluoranthene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[a]pyrene u 2700 mofkg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
lndeno(1 ,2,3-c,d)Pyrene u 2700 mgfkg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benz a[ g, h, ijperylene u 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Coronene N 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Total Of 17 PAH's N 2700 mg/kg 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0
PCB 28 u 2810 mg/l(g 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 <0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 52 u 2815 mgfkg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 <0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 101 u 2815 mg/kg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 118 u 2815 mgfkg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 153 u 2815 mgfkg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 138 u 2815 mg/kg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
PCB 180 u 2810 mg/kg 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010
Total PCBs {7 Congeners) N 2815 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Total Phenols u 2920 mg/kg 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30
Page 5 of6
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
test Report Information
Ke U UKAS accredited M MCERTS and UKAS accredited N Unaccredited S This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis
SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysis T This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory
1/S Insufficient Sample U/S Unsuitable Sample N/E not evaluated
< "less than" > "greater than"
Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation The results relate only to the items tested Uncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery corrected All results are expressed on a dry weight basis The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVCOs, PCBs, Phenols For all other tests the samples were dried at< 37"C prior to analysis All Asbestos testing is performed at our Coventry laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1
Sample Deviation Codes A - Date of sampling not supplied B Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction) C- Sample not received in appropriate containers D - Broken Container
Sample Retention and Disposal All soil samples will be retained for a period of 60 days from the date of receipt All water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receipt Charges may apply to extended sample storage
If you require extended retention of samples, please email your requirements to: [email protected]
Page 6 of 6
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
2183
Final Report
Report No.:
Initial Date of Issue:
Client
Client Address:
Contact(s):
Project
Quotation No.:
15-26843-1
19-Nov-2015
Priority Geotechnical Ltd
Unit 12 Owenacurra Business Park Midleton County Cork Ireland
Colette Kelly
P15136 - Magh Nala Building 1 & 2
Order No.: 8113
No. of Samples: 3
Turnaround (Wkdays): 5
Date Approved: 19-Nov-2015
Approved By:
Details: Darrell Hall, Laboratory Director
Page 1 of 3
The nght chom1stry to deliver results
Date Received:
Date Instructed:
Target Date:
Results Due:
Chemtest Ltd. Depot Road Newmarket
CBS OAL Tel: 01638 606070
Email: [email protected]
16-Nov-2015
16-Nov-2015
20-Nov-2015
20-Nov-20 15
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
~ mtest Results -Water Tl1e ng!1t cllem1stry 10 cJul<ver ros~1lts
Project: P15136- Maqh Nala Building 1 & 2 Client: Priority Geotechnical Ltd .·· Chern test Job No.: 15'26843 15~26843 15·26843 Quotation No.: Chemtest Sample 10.: 219643 219644 219645 Order No.: 8113 Client Sample Ref.:
Client Sample 10.: BH1 BH3 BH6 Sample Type WATER WATER WATER
Top Depth (m)
Bottom Depth (mj· Date Sampled: 12·Nov-2015 12-Nov-2015 12-Nov-2015
Determinand Accred. SOP Units LCD : pH u 1010 NiA 8.0 8.2 7.9 Electrical Conductivity u 1020 1-JS/cm 1.0 310 380 490 Chloride u 1220 mg/1 1.0 42 12 11 Ammonium u 1220 m9n 0.010 0.64 0.43 0.42 Nitrite u 1220 m9n 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 Nitrate u 1220 m9n 0.50 3.5 < 0.50 1.9 Arsenic (Dissolved) u 1450 IJQ/1 1.0 < 1.0 1.1 < 1.0 Boron (Dissolved) u 1450 ~gil 20 21 29 < 20 Cadmium (Dissolved) u 1450 IJQ/1 0.080 0.16 < 0.080 < 0.080 Chromium (Dissolved) u 1450 IJQ/1 1.0 1.2 3.0 1.8 Copper {Dissolved) u 1450 ~gil 1.0 < 1.0 2.3 < 1.0 Mercury {Dissolved) u 1450 IJQ/1 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 Nickel (Dissolved) u 1450 IJ0/1 1.0 3.0 1.2 < 1.0 Lead {Dissolved) u 1450 IJQ/1 1.0 < 1.0 1.4 < 1.0
Selenium {Dissolved) u 1450 ~gil 1.0 < 1.0 1.5 1.0 Zinc {Dissolved) u 1450 !JQII 1.0 21 4.6 5.2 Naphthalene u 1700 ~gn 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Acenaphthylene u 1700 ~gil 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Acenaphthene u 1700 !JQII 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Fluorene u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Phenanthrene u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Anthracene u 1700 ~gil 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Fluoranthene u 1700 IJ0/1 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Pyrene u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Bem':o[a]anthracene u 1700 ~gil 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Chrysene u 1700 ~gil 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzofb]ftuoranthene u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[k]ftuoranthene u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[a]pyrene u 1700 ~gil 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 lndeno(1 ,2,3-c,d)Pyrene u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Oibenz(a,h)Anthracene u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene u 1700 "gil 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Total Of 16 PAH's u 1700 ~gil 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0
Phenol N 1790 _)Jg/1_ 0.50 ............ < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
Page 2 of 3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
Report Information
Ke U UKAS accredited M MCERTS and UKAS accredited N Unaccredited S This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis
SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysis T This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory
1/S Insufficient Sample U/S Unsuitable Sample N/E not evaluated
< "less than" > "greater than"
Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation The results relate only to the items tested Uncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery corrected All results are expressed on a dry weight basis The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, Phenols For all other tests the samples were dried at< 3TC prior to analysis All Asbestos testing is performed at our Coventry laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1
Sample Deviation Codes A- Date of sampling not supplied B- Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction) C- Sample not received in appropriate containers D - Broken Container
Sample Retention and Disposal All soil samples will be retained for a period of 60 days from the date of receipt All water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receipt Charges may apply to extended sample storage
If you require extended retention of samples, please email your requirements to: customerservices@chemtest. co. uk
Page 3 of 3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
2!33
Final Report
Report No.:
Initial Date of Issue:
Client
Client Address:
Contact(s):
Project
Quotation No.:
Order No.:
No. of Samples:
15-26840-1
19-Nov-2015
Priority Geotechnical Ltd
Unit 12 Owenacurra Business Park Midleton County Cork Ireland
Colette Kelly
P15136- Magh Nala Building 1 & 2
8113
Turnaround (Wkdays): 5
Date Approved: 19-Nov-2015
Approved By:
Details: Darrell Hall. Laboratory Director
Page 1 of3
The nght chemistry to deliver results
Chern test Ltd.
Date Received:
Date Instructed:
Target Date:
Results Due:
Depot Road Newmarket
CBB OAL Tel: 01638 606070
Email: [email protected](
16-Nov-2015
16-Nov-2015
20-Nov-2015
20-Nov-2015
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
~ n1test The nght ctlem•stry to c!el!ver results
iect: P15136- Magh Nala Building 1 & 2 [f_U~_Il_t:f'>riority Geotechnical Ltd :Job No'.
ion No.:
IOrder~3
I Deterrn inand
IPH
!Nitrite
~Nitrate "----=-'"'-solved:
Copper
Mercury \UIS
Nickel (Dissolved: Lead-~-
~~_s; __ l
Fluorene
lyrene
Ictal Of 16 PAH's !Phenol
;t Sample ID.:I 21964C Client Sample Ref.·
Client Sample ID :I BH: Sample Type:! WATER
Top Depth (m): Bottom Depth (m):
Date Sampled:[1-~-""'u-i Accred. I Units I LOD
I "S/cm mgn
u 11220 I mgn I U 1220 mg/1 0.020 u 11220 I mgn I 0.50
u
"" ...!!.!! ...!!.!! "g
u 0.50
I.JC::
1-19
11450 I IJC u 1450 1-19 u 11700 ~g/1 0.10 u _)_1700 ~g/1 0.10
~ 0.10
~ ~
IJQ/1 u 1700 IJQ/l u 1700 IJQ/1 0. 1 0
u 1700 "g/1 0.10 u 1700 IJQ/l 0.10 u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10
u 1700 IJQ/1 0.10 u 010
___I!!! ~g
N 117901 ~g
0.10
< 0.020
< 0.50 < 1.0
< 0.080
< 0.50 < 1. < •. <
< 0.10 < 0.10
< 0.10 < 0. < 0. < <
< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0. <
<
<
< 0.10
< 0.10 < 0.10 < 2.
< 0.50
Results -Water
Page 2 of3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
Report Information
Ke U UKAS accredited M MCERTS and UKAS accredited N Unaccredited S This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis
SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysis T This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory
1/S Insufficient Sample U/S Unsuitable Sample N/E not evaluated
< "less than" > "greater than"
Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation The results relate only to the items tested Uncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery corrected All results are expressed on a dry weight basis The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, Phenols For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37'C prior to analysis All Asbestos testing is performed at our Coventry laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1
Sample Deviation Codes A- Date of sampling not supplied B- Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction) C- Sample not received in appropriate containers D- Broken Container
Sample Retention and Disposal All soil samples will be retained for a period of 60 days from the date of receipt All water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receipt Charges may apply to extended sample storage
If you require extended retention of samples, please email your requirements to: [email protected]
Page 3 of 3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 01-06-2016:01:17:36
