MTA-DPT TC-Implementation Early Implementation/Spot Improvements ($56,100): ... State of Cycling Report: The MTA has requested a total of $150,000 in sales tax funds for the

J:\2010\Memos\03 Mar 23 2010\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation MEMO.doc Page 1 of 5

Memorandum

Date: 02.04.10 RE: Plans and Programs Committee February 9, 2010

To: Plans and Programs Committee: Commissioners Campos (Chair), Chu (Vice Chair), Chiu, Avalos, Dufty and Mirkarimi (Ex Officio)

From: Anna LaForte – Deputy Director for Policy and Programming Maria Lombardo – Chief Deputy Director for Policy and Programming

Through: José Luis Moscovich – Executive Director

Subject: ACTION – Recommend the Allocation of $2,807,175 in Prop K Funds, with Conditions, to the Municipal Transportation Agency for Six Requests, Subject to the Attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules, and Amendment of the Traffic Calming 5-Year Prioritization Program

Summary

Due to a crowded February Plans and Programs Committee agenda, we have grouped six Prop K allocation requests from the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) into a single memo. The MTA has requested a total of $2,807,175 in Prop K funds for a variety of projects, including: procuring and installing raised pavement markings; continuing its Traffic Sign Graffiti and Upgrade Program; planning, design, and implementation of traffic calming projects; planning and design work for five bicycle infrastructure projects; creation of an innovative bicycle treatments toolbox and implementation of two innovative pilots (i.e., green-wave and back-in angled parking); and development of the 2011 State of Cycling Report. Attachment 1 summarizes the applications received, and Attachment 2 provides a brief description of each project. Attachment 3 provides a summary of our staff recommendation, highlighting issues of potential interest to the committee, such as recommended special conditions. The Authority Board has previously approved the 2009 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) update for the relevant Prop K categories. Only the traffic calming request requires minor revisions to the corresponding 5YPP, which would remain consistent with programming levels and financing assumptions in the Strategic Plan. We are seeking a recommendation to allocate $2,807,175 in Prop K funds, with conditions, to the MTA for six requests, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules, and amendment of the Traffic Calming 5YPP.

BACKGROUND

Due to crowded February Plans and Programs Committee agenda, we have grouped six Prop K allocation requests from the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) into a single memo. The MTA has requested a total of $2,807,175 in Prop K funds from the following Expenditure Plan categories: New Signals and Signs, Signals and Signs Maintenance, Traffic Calming, and Bicycle Circulation and Safety. The Authority Board has previously approved the 2009 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) for each of these Expenditure Plan categories.

The purpose of this memorandum is to present these six requests to the Plans and Programs Committee and seek a recommendation to allocate the requested funds, with conditions.

DISCUSSION

Attachment 1 summarizes the six Prop K applications received from the MTA, including information on leveraging (i.e., stretching Prop K dollars further by matching them with other fund sources) as

Attachments and Enclosures were updated for the March 23, 2010 Plans and Programs Committee meeting.


compared to Expenditure Plan assumptions. Attachment 2 provides a brief description of each project. Further details on scope, schedule, budget and funding plan for each project are included in the enclosed Allocation Request Forms.

As shown in Attachment 1, none of the six requests leverage any Prop K funds for the phase or phases for which funding is requested. For most of the requests, while not ideal, this is not inconsistent with the approved 5YPPs where these particular projects may not leverage funds (e.g. State of Cycling Report), but the category as a whole (e.g. Bicycle Circulation and Safety) or future project phases (e.g. bicycle project implementation) typically meet Expenditure Plan leveraging expectations.

Staff Recommendation: Attachment 3 summarizes the staff recommendation for the six allocation requests and highlights information that may be of interest to the committee such as recommended special conditions. In all cases, our funding recommendation matches the amount requested by the project sponsor. In the sections below, we provide some additional detail on four of the proposed projects.

Traffic Calming Implementation: When San Francisco voters approved Prop K in 2003, it provided the first steady source of funding for the MTA’s traffic calming program. During the first 5 years of Prop K, the MTA’s traffic calming program had a heavier focus on planning and experienced a learning curve regarding the level of effort and resources necessary to develop traffic calming planning projects through a community-based planning process. The recently approved 2009 Traffic Calming 5YPP marks a shift to implementation, which is what we see with the MTA’s request for $2,085,450 in Prop K funds for the following three traffic calming implementation projects:

• Traffic Calming Implementation ($1,944,150): The MTA will plan, design and construct over 90 separate traffic calming devices including speed humps, islands, curb bulb-outs, and various operational improvements like red curbs and signage to improve sightlines and visibility of crosswalks, and edge-lines to visually narrow roadways. The proposed improvements stem from 19 completed traffic calming planning projects.

• Sunset Traffic Circle ($85,200): The MTA will plan, design and construct a pilot traffic circle in the Sunset District to determine if it can be a useful measure where STOP signs are requested but unwarranted, and where speeding may occur at the intersection. The MTA will work with the community and Supervisor Chu’s office to select an appropriate location for the pilot.

• Early Implementation/Spot Improvements ($56,100): The MTA will use this funding to implement early action projects from traffic calming planning projects that were recently funded by Prop K [Resolution 10-25, approved October 2009, and are currently underway (i.e., Minna/Natoma, South Silver Terrace, and Folsom Street)]. The MTA has not yet identified the specific improvements and would need to submit the scope of the proposed projects to Authority staff before it proceeds with implementation.

The MTA expects to start the implementation of all these projects by March 2010 and to complete the projects by June 2012. All planning and design work will be performed by the MTA and the construction work will be done by city forces.

5YPP Amendment: The requested allocation requires several minor revisions to the Traffic Calming 5YPP to match available funding to the updated project budgets. The changes will not accelerate Prop K cash flow and are consistent with the Strategic Plan amount programmed to the Traffic Calming category in Fiscal Year 2009/10.


If the Authority Board approves the subject allocation, there would still be additional implementation funds remaining in Fiscal Year 2009/10, and we are currently working with the MTA on some upcoming requests. We are continuing to work with the MTA to identify leveraging opportunities for the remaining traffic calming funds.

Bicycle Network Planning and Design: The MTA has requested $60,000 in Prop K funds to help complete the design phase of four bicycle projects and the planning phase of one bicycle project, all of which are included in the 2009 Bicycle Plan (See Attachment 2 for a list of the specific projects). Most of the near-term bicycle network improvements described in the Bicycle Plan have been fully planned, designed, and cleared environmentally at the project level, but a number of projects, including the five in this request, require additional planning, design, and environmental clearance before they can move forward to implementation.

The MTA expects to complete the proposed scope of work by March 2011. The MTA has indicated that the planning and design work of bicycle projects included as near-term projects in the 2009 Bicycle Plan, as well as work proposed as part of the two bicycle projects discussed below, can occur under the modified injunction of the Bicycle Plan. The MTA anticipates that the modified injunction may be lifted as soon as early Summer 2010.

Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments: The MTA has requested $100,000 in Prop K funds for the development of an Innovative Treatments Toolbox, as well as the implementation of two high priority pilot projects. To create the Innovative Treatments Toolbox, the MTA will produce a summary of innovative treatments (e.g., bike boulevards, bike boxes) cost estimates for those treatments, a description of necessary regulatory approvals, and an evaluation methodology to gauge the effectiveness of innovative treatments. As part of the toolbox development process, the MTA will also create a prioritized list of locations for innovative treatments in San Francisco, with funding plans for implementing the high priority projects as pilots. The final piece of the toolbox will consist of a number of fully designed innovative treatments with construction cost estimates, funding plans, and implementation schedules. This will enable the toolbox to set the road map for future year Prop K allocations from the Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments line item included in the Bicycle Circulation and Safety 5YPP. The MTA expects to complete the toolbox by December 2011.

As part of this same request, the MTA would also implement two innovative treatment pilots (i.e. a green wave and back-in angled parking project) in Spring 2010. The green-wave project will occur on a bike route along which the traffic signals are timed to allow for the unimpeded progression of bicyclists. The back-in angled parking project will allow vehicles to enter a parking space in reverse, since vehicles reversing out of angled parking spaces pose potential risks to cyclists because of awkward sightlines. The MTA would evaluate each pilot installation based on a combination of user feedback and observed impacts to traffic and transit. MTA staff anticipates that these two projects will be piloted from May to October 2010.

State of Cycling Report: The MTA has requested a total of $150,000 in sales tax funds for the development of the 2011 State of Cycling Report, including some data collection and analysis. The funding would include $131,325 in Prop K funds and necessitate a concurrent amendment to two Prop B bicycle grants to allow the remaining $18,675 to be used for the report.

The State of Cycling Report is a publication produced by the MTA biennially. It uses bicycle traffic volumes and public opinion surveys to gauge ridership and public perception of bicycle facilities in San Francisco. The survey data will be used to design promotional and educational campaigns that address the specific barriers to cycling as described by survey respondents. In addition, calculation of the


bicycling mode split is a useful indicator of the success of San Francisco’s efforts to improve cycling infrastructure and to promote bicycling as a healthy, sustainable, and cost-effective mode of transportation. The first San Francisco State of Cycling Report was released in Summer 2009 and was also funded by Prop K funds. In Spring 2010, the MTA will issue a request for proposals for consultant services to complete a number of tasks related to the 2011 report. The MTA expects to publish the report by May 2011.

Special Condition for Overhead Multiplier: We have also included a special condition that, pending Authority approval of the MTA’s proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI.

We are seeking a recommendation to approve the allocation of $2,807,175 in Prop K funds, with conditions, to the MTA for six requests, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules, and amendment of the Traffic Calming 5YPP.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Recommend allocation of $2,807,175 in Prop K funds, with conditions, to the MTA for six requests, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules, and amendment of the Traffic Calming 5YPP, as requested.

2. Recommend allocation of $2,807,175 in Prop K funds, with conditions, to the MTA for six requests, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules, and amendment of the Traffic Calming 5YPP, with modifications.

3. Defer action, pending additional information or further staff analysis.

CAC POSITION

The Citizens Advisory Committee was briefed on this item at its January 27, 2010 meeting, and unanimously adopted a motion of support for the staff recommendation.

FINANCIAL IMPACTS

As detailed in Attachment 2 and the enclosed Allocation Request Forms, the recommended action would allocate a total of $2,807,175 in Fiscal Year 2009/10 Prop K funds. The allocations would be subject to the Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules contained in the enclosed Allocation Request Forms. The recommended cash flows are consistent with the Prop K Strategic Plan, and as such, will not trigger the need for additional financing beyond that already assumed in the Strategic Plan. The Prop K Capital Budget (Attachment 4) shows cash flow distribution schedules for the staff recommendation. Attachment 5 contains a summary table of the recommended cash flow distribution schedules.

Sufficient funds are included in the adopted Fiscal Year 2009/10 budget to accommodate the proposed recommendation. Furthermore, sufficient funds will be included in future budgets to cover the recommended cash flow distribution for those respective fiscal years.

RECOMMENDATION

Recommend allocation of $2,807,175 in Prop K funds, with conditions, to the MTA for six requests, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules, and amendment of the Traffic Calming 5YPP.


Attachments: 1. Summary of Applications Received 2. Brief Project Descriptions 3. Staff Recommendation 4. Prop K Capital Budget* 5. Prop K Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution – Summary Table* 6. Allocation Request Form*

Enclosures: Prop K Allocation Request Forms (6) **

**Updated Enclosures for the March 23, 2010 Plans and Programs Committee Meeting: • Map of Installed Traffic Calming Measures • List of Installed Traffic Calming Measures by District • Map of All Traffic Calming Applications • Map of All Accepted Traffic Calming Applications and Current Status

*Updated Attachments for the March 23, 2010 Plans and Programs Committee Meeting: • Attachment 4: Prop K Capital Budget • Attachment 5: Prop K Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution – Summary Table • Attachment 6: Allocation Request Form – This item moved from Enclosure to

Attachment

Attachment 1: Summary of Allocations Received - January 2010

EP Line

No. 1Project

Sponsor 2Project Name

Project

Type 3Current Prop

K Request

Total Cost for Requested

Phase

Expected Leveraging by

EP Line 4

Actual Leveraging by

Project Phase5

Phases Requested

31 MTA-DPT Raised Pavement Markings Annual 180,400$ 180,400$ 28% 0% Procurement/ Construction

33 MTA-DPT Traffic Sign Graffiti and Upgrade Program Annual 250,000$ 250,000$ 41% 0% Procurement/ Construction

38 MTA-DPT Traffic Calming Implementation Annual 2,085,450$ 2,085,450$ 51% 0% Planning/ Design/

Construction

39 MTA-DPT Bicycle Network Planning and Design Annual 60,000$ 60,000$ 28% 0% Planning/Env/Design

39 MTA-DPT Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments Annual 100,000$ 100,000$ 28% 0% Planning/ Design/Construction

39 MTA-DPT State of Cycling Report6 Annual 131,325$ 150,000$ 28% 12% Planning $ 2,807,175 $ 2,825,850

6 To fully fund the State of Cycling Report, MTA has also requested amendment of two Prop B grants to allow a total of $18,675 in remaining funds to be applied to this project. See enclosed Allocation Request Form for details.

3 "Project Type" differentiates between one-time capital projects and annual programs funded by Prop K.

Prop K Leveraging

4 Expected Leveraging is calculated by dividing the total non-Prop K funds expected to be available for a given Expenditure Plan line item (e.g. Bicycle Circulation and Safety) by the Total Expected Funding for that Expenditure Plan line item over the 30-year Expenditure Plan period. Expected Leveraging of 90% indicates that on average non-Prop K funds should cover 90% of the total project cost and Prop K should cover only 10% of the project cost.5 Actual Leveraging by Project is calculated by dividing the total non-Prop K funds in the project's funding plan by the total cost for the requested phase or phases. If the percentage in the "Actual Leveraging" column is lower than in the "Expected Leveraging" column, the particular request (indicated by yellow highlighting) is leveraging fewer non-Prop K dollars than assumed in the Expenditure Plan.

TOTAL1 "EP Line No." is the Expenditure Plan line number referenced in the provisionally adopted 2009 Prop K Strategic Plan.2 Acronym for project sponsor includes Municipal Transportation Agency - Department of Parking and Traffic (MTA-DPT).

J:\2010\Memos\03 Mar 23 2010\Traffic Calming Implementation\TC - Implementation ATT 1-3 Page 1of 4

Attachment 2: Brief Project Descriptions

EP Line No.

Project Sponsor

Project NameProp K Funds

RequestedProject Description

31 MTA-DPT Raised Pavement Markings 180,400$

MTA's Sign Shop will use the requested Prop K funds to procure and install 25,000 raised pavement markers on approximately 35 miles of roadway in 14 corridors citywide. MTA prioritizes roadways where visibility is often poor due to fog or infrequent street lights, and where traffic from heavy vehicles has damaged existing lane markings. Project completion is expected by June 30, 2011.

33 MTA-DPT Traffic Sign Graffiti and Upgrade Program 250,000$

Requested Prop K funds will allow continuation of MTA's Traffic Sign Graffiti and Upgrade Program through December 2010. This program has been funded entirely by Prop K since its inception in 2006. It reduces the impact of vandalism on traffic signs by installing signs with graffiti-resistant coatings in place of existing signs and by raising signs where appropriate. To date the program has upgraded nearly 17,000 signs. Procurement and installation will be performed by city forces.

MTA's traffic calming implementation request includes three sub-projects: Traffic Calming Implementation ($1,944,150): MTA will plan, design and construct over 90 separate traffic calming devices (e.g. speed humps, traffic islands, speed humps) from 19 separate traffic calming planning projects. See enclosed Allocation Request Form for detailed listing of improvements and locations. Sunset Traffic Circle ($85,200): MTA will plan, design and construct a pilot traffic circle in the Sunset District to determine if it can be a useful measure where STOP signs are requested but unwarranted, and where speeding may occur at the intersection. MTA will work with the community and SupervisorChu's office to select an appropriate location for the pilot.

Early Implementation/Spot Improvements ($56,100): MTA will use this funding to implement early action projects from traffic calming planning projects that are currently underway (Minna/Natoma, South Silver Terrace, Folsom) and expected to be complete in Fiscal Year 2010/11. MTA expects to start the implementation of these projects by March 2010 and to complete the projects by June 2012. All planning and design work will be performed by MTA staff. All construction work will be done by city forces at the Department of Public Works.

Traffic Calming Implementation 2,085,450$ MTA-DPT38


Attachment 2: Brief Project Descriptions

EP Line No.

Project Sponsor

Project NameProp K Funds

RequestedProject Description

39 MTA-DPT Bicycle Network Planning and Design 60,000$

Requested Prop K funds will allow for the continuation of planning and design work for near-term projects identified in the Bicycle Plan that have not yet received environmental clearance or local legislation for roadway and/or parking changes—2nd Street (Market Street to King Street) and Phelan Avenue. Additionally, this allocation will fund MTA staff time for coordination on bicycle facility improvements that will be implemented by other city agencies, private entities, or other MTA sections, including Marina Boulevard (Lyon Street to Buchanan Street), Innes Avenue (Donahue Street to Hunters Point Boulevard), and coordination of Glen Park BART Station area bicycle facilities with the Glen Park Community Plan. MTA expects to complete near-term project design and planning coordination activitiesby March 2011.

39 MTA-DPT Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments 100,000$

Requested Prop K funds will allow creation of an Innovative Treatments Toolbox and implementation of two innovative treatments pilots--a green wave signal retiming project and a back-in angled parking configuration, which will be piloted from May to October 2010. Along with development of a toolbox, MTA will prioritize locations for future pilots and produce final designs, construction costs, funding plans, and implementation schedules for the top priority locations. All of the above work would be completed by December 2011.

39 MTA-DPT State of Cycling Report 131,325$

The requested Prop K funds ($131,325) and amendment of two Prop B grants (providing an additional $18,675) would fund development of the 2011 State of Cycling Report, including some data collection and analysis. MTA's biennial report uses bicycle traffic volumes and public opinion surveys to gauge ridership and public perception of bicycle facilities in San Francisco. The purpose of the report is to inform the public about the progress of cycling in San Francisco and to advise the MTA Bicycle Program on how to maximize its efforts. It also provides required performance measure data for Prop K. MTA anticipates completing the report by December 2011.

$ 2,807,175 TOTAL


Attachment 3: Staff Recommendation

EP Line No.

Project Sponsor Project Name

Prop K Funds

Recommended 1 Notes31 MTA-DPT Raised Pavement Markings 180,400$ No issues. Prior year allocations were delivered and are being closed out.

33 MTA-DPT Traffic Sign Graffiti and Upgrade Program 250,000$ No issues. Prior year allocations were delivered and are being closed out.

This request has several required deliverables and special conditions. Highlights include: 5YPP Amendment: This allocation will require several minor revisions to the 5YPP for Traffic Calming to match programming amounts to the updated project budgets. The amendments will not accelerate Prop K cash flow and are consistent with the Strategic Plan amount programmed to the Traffic Calming category in Fiscal Year 2009/10.Budget Flexibility: The Traffic Calming Implementation sub-project provides funds for implementing improvements from 19 areawide plans. MTA can modify the individual budgets up to 20% as long as the total budget remains unchanged. Larger revisions will require prior approval by Authority staff. Conditional Release of Funds: MTA may not incur expenses for the design or construction phases for the Early Implementation/Spot Improvements sub-project ($56,100) until it has submitted the locations and treatments identified for implementation to Authority staff for approval.

Multi-phase Allocation: We are recommending a multi-phase allocation due to the project's straightforward scope (e.g., finalizing planning/design for speed humps), and short duration and low cost of planning and design phases.

39 MTA-DPT Bicycle Network Planning and Design 60,000$ Multi-phase Allocation: We are recommending a multi-phase allocation due to the project's

straightforward scope and relatively short duration of planning and design phases.

39 MTA-DPT Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments 100,000$

Although the requested funds only provide for implementation of two pilots (green wave and back-in angled parking), we encourage MTA to seek funds for implementation of additional pilots in FY 2009/10 or early FY 2010/11 if design work is able to be completed sooner than anticipated. Multi-phase Allocation: We are recommending a multi-phase allocation due to the nature of the scope (e.g. developing a toolbox of innovative treatments and then planning and designing pilots for high priority locations).

39 MTA-DPT State of Cycling Report 131,325$

Prop B Amendments: The recommended allocation is contingent upon concurrent amendment of two Prop B bicycle grants (Res. 99-36, Project 47d - $570 and Res. 01-38, Project 47.4 - $18,105) to allow the remaining funds totaling $18,675 to be used for the State of Cycling Report. These amendment would expedite close out of these older grants.

$ 2,807,175 1 In all cases, the amount of Prop K funds recommended equals the amount requested by the project sponsor.

TOTAL

38 MTA-DPT Traffic Calming Implementation 2,085,450$


Attachment 4.

Prop K FY 2009/10 Capital Budget1

EP # Sponsor Project Name Total FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14TRANSIT

3 MTA Inner Sunset Traffic Calming Project - Phase 12 $317,000 $158,500 $158,500

3 MTAGolden Gate Park and Duboce Avenue Pedestrian Improvements2 $310,000 $310,000

3 MTA Central Subway - Design PS&E Segment3 $27,418,669 $0 $27,418,6695 TJPA Transit Center Final Design $18,200,000 $9,100,000 $9,100,000

7 PCJPB Systemwide Signal and Communications Improvements $33,333 $16,667 $16,666

7 PCJPB Systemwide Station Improvements $166,667 $83,333 $83,3347 PCJPB Caltrain Capital Planning $1,530,000 $765,000 $765,000

17M MTA Re-power Standard Motor Coaches $245,000 $37,000 $168,000 $40,00017P PCJPB Vehicle and Operating Improvements $1,412,363 $706,181 $706,18220M MTA Islais Creek Phase I $27,935,055 $9,777,269 $12,570,775 $5,587,01120M MTA Escalator Rehabilitation - Phase I $1,028,069 $452,350 $575,719

22M MTA C3 - Subway PA & PDS Systems Replacement $600,000 $200,000 $400,000

22M MTA Capital Grants Staffing $270,000 $270,000

22M MTA Green Light Rail Center Track Replacement $660,000 $429,000 $231,000

22M MTA St. Francis Circle Rail Replacement $2,210,000 $287,300 $1,723,800 $198,900

22M MTA Radio Communications System & CAD Replacement $69,174,932 $0 $17,293,733 $24,211,226 $20,752,480 $6,917,493

22M MTA California Street Cable Car Infrastructure Improvements 3,159,506$ $0 $1,920,000 $1,207,911 $31,595

22M MTA Church and Duboce Track Improvement 4,950,000$ $0 $495,000 $2,475,000 $1,980,000

22P PCJPB Systemwide Signal and Communications Improvements $320,000 $160,000 $160,000

22P PCJPB Systemwide Station Improvements $1,408,333 $0 $1,408,33322P PCJPB Systemwide Bridge Improvements $333,333 $180,000 $153,333

$161,682,260 $22,932,600 $75,348,044 $33,720,048 $22,764,075 $6,917,493

PARATRANSIT23 MTA Paratransit $9,670,000 $9,670,000

Paratransit Subtotal: $9,670,000 $9,670,000 $0 $0 $0 $0

STREETS AND TRAFFIC SAFETY

26 DPW Great Highway Emergency Toe Stabilization $1,330,000 $1,330,000

31 MTA New Signal Contract 60 $375,000 $187,500 $187,500

31 MTA Raised Pavement Markings $180,400 $45,100 $135,300

32 MTA SFgo Franklin and Gough Streets (Van Ness Corridors) Improvements 1,470,850$ $0 $980,570 $490,280

33 MTA Traffic Sign Graffiti and Upgrade Program $250,000 $125,000 $125,000

34 DPW Harrison Street Pavement Renovation $2,970,000 $1,485,000 $1,485,000

35 DPW Street Repair and Cleaning Equipment $699,000 $0 $699,000

37 MTA Public Sidewalk Repair $554,760 $554,760

Cash Flow Distribution

Transit Subtotal:

Capital Budget FY 0910 March Capital Budget - 3 Page 1 of 2

Attachment 4.

Prop K FY 2009/10 Capital Budget1

EP # Sponsor Project Name Total FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14


38 MTA Traffic Calming - Planning, Evaluation, and Outreach $298,000 $149,000 $149,000

38 MTA Clarendon School Traffic Calming - Local Match $86,120 $2,330 $83,790

38 MTA Traffic Calming Program - Implementation $2,085,450 $527,771 $807,880 $749,79939 MTA Bicycle Network Planning and Design $60,000 $15,057 $44,94339 MTA Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments $100,000 $22,600 $66,694 $10,70639 MTA State of Cycling Report $131,325 $0 $131,325

40 MTA Golden Gate Park and Duboce Avenue Pedestrian Improvements $140,000 $140,000

40 MTA Citywide Pedestrian Safety and Circulation Improvements $470,000 $285,000 $185,000

40 MTA Duboce Avenue Pedestrian Improvements $173,000 $0 $173,000

41 DPW Curb Ramps $731,000 $22,000 $709,000

42 DPW Tree Establishment and Maintenance $1,016,000 $1,016,000

Streets and Traffic Safety Subtotal: $13,120,905 $5,907,118 $5,963,002 $1,250,785 $0 $0

TSM/STRATEGIC INITIATIVES

43 DOE Clean Air Program - Commuter Benefits Program $119,790 $119,790

43 DOE Clean Air Program - Emergency Ride Home Program Program $13,310 $13,310

43 DOE Clean Air Program - Bicycle Program $10,000 $10,000

43 DOE Clean Air Program - Regional Rideshare Program $35,000 $35,000

TSM/Strategic Initiatives Subtotal: $178,100 $178,100 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL $184,651,265 $38,687,818 $81,311,046 $34,970,833 $22,764,075 $6,917,493

2 Amount shown is part of a $2.025 M swap of FY 2008/09 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds programmed to 3 MTA Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Program (RBPP) projects with an equivalent amount of Prop K funds programmed to MTA's Central Subway project (EP No. 3) (Resolution 09-25, approved 11.25.08).3 Amount shown is the Prop K portion of a $36,418,669 final design allocation that includes $9,000,000 in FY 2009/10 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), which were concurrently allocated by the Authority. TCRP fund may be fully expended in FY 2009/10.

1 This table shows Cash Flow Destribution Schedules for all FY 2009/10 allocations approved to date, along with the current recommended allocation(s).Shaded lines indicate allocations/appropriations that are part of the current action.

Capital Budget FY 0910 March Capital Budget - 3 Page 2 of 2

Attachment 5.

Prop K FY 2009/10 Capital Budget Summary1


Total FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2012/13Prior Allocations 182,565,815 38,160,047 80,503,166 34,221,034 22,764,075 6,917,493Current Request(s) 2,085,450 527,771 807,880 749,799 0 0Total Allocations 184,651,265 38,687,818 81,311,046 34,970,833 22,764,075 6,917,493

1 This table shows total cash flow for all FY 2009/10 allocations approved to date, along with the current recommended allocation(s).

Capital Budget FY 0910 March CF Summary - 3 Page 1 of 1

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form

FY of Allocation Action: 2009/10

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Project/Program:

EP Line Number (Primary): 38 Current Request:

Other EP Line Numbers: Supervisorial District(s):

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

a. Traffic Calming

$2,085,450

Traffic Calming Program - Implementation

SCOPE

MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT)

C. Street & Traffic Safety

Citywide

Gray cells will automatically be filled in.

Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonablenes of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided ina separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7-Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets.

Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was priortized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans,including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 1-Scope Form v. 0809 Page 1 of 31

Please see attached MS Word document.

Gray cells will automatically be filled in.

Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonablenes of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided ina separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7-Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets.

Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was priortized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans,including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs.

Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account.

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 1-Scope Form v. 0809 Page 1 of 31

No. 3

1

Background and Scope SFMTA requests an allocation of $2,085,450 in Prop K funds for the project development, design, and construction phases of 19 traffic calming projects. Of the total amount, $141,300 will fund Early Implementation/Action measures (defined below). $1,944,150 will fund the project development, detailed design and construction phases of traffic calming measures from 19 traffic calming areawide projects approved by the SFMTA Board. The project budget includes $1,408,060 for DPW construction labor and materials, $352,015 for project contingencies and monitoring, $135,406 for design engineering, and $189,969 for project development and MTA staff to perform outreach associated with the speed hump balloting process in which MTA staff holds a public meeting and ballots the neighbors on the block to vote yay or nay on the siting of a speed hump. To move forward, at least 50% of those voting have to approve the installation, with at least 25% of the ballots being returned. The areawide projects to be implemented with Prop K funds include:

1. 18th Avenue Bypass 2. Bayview 3. Central Richmond 4. Cerritos-Cedro 5. Circular 6. Crestlake 7. Excelsior 8. Fillmore 9. Holloway-Garfield 10. North Bernal Heights 11. O'Shaughnessy 12. Potrero Hill 13. Randolph-Broad 14. Roosevelt-Buena Vista-17th Street 15. St Francis Wood 16. South Bernal Heights 17. Sunnyside 18. Teresita 19. West Portal

Traffic calming measures include speed humps, islands, bulbouts, and various operational improvements like red curbs and signage to improve sightlines and visibility of crosswalks, and edgelines to visually narrow roadways. These projects are listed by device type and areawide plan in tables on the following pages. Prop K funds are programmed in the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) for the Traffic Calming category under the Early Implementation Action sub-category for Spot Improvements ($56,100) where early action is prudent. Spot Improvement funds will be used to implement early action measures identified through the Minna-Natoma, South Silver

No. 3

2

Terrace, and/or the Folsom Street project development efforts which were recently funded with Prop K funds as part of a Fiscal Year 2009/10 allocation for plan development. SFMTA also requests $85,200 for a traffic circle in the Sunset District to determine if this can be a useful measure where STOP signs are requested but unwarranted, and where speeding may occur at the intersection. SFMTA will determine the location by working with the Supervisor’s office to determine a suitable location that is also supported by residents. Implementation SFMTA staff will perform the planning and design phase work and manage the construction phase for the implementation of traffic calming measures. SFMTA will work order funds to DPW to construct the measures. Schedule To the extent possible, the implementation of these measures will be broken down by areawide project, with recently completed areawide projects receiving first priority in order to maintain project development momentum and to begin installation of measures. The group of areawide projects receiving priority includes:

• Central Richmond • Cerritos-Cedro • Crestlake • Fillmore • Holloway-Garfield • Potrero Hill • Roosevelt-Buena Vista-17th Street • St Francis Wood • Sunnyside

As there are different DPW crews for asphalt (speed humps) and concrete (islands and bulb outs) work, implementation will also be grouped by measure type, particularly speed humps where there is economy of scale for SFMTA to do the outreach and balloting. For DPW crews, who can install more than one hump a day, there is also an efficiency associated with constructing multiple humps in the same area. There are fewer economies of scale with islands and bulb-outs which require more than a day to construct, but efficiencies via grouping will still be sought by SFMTA and DPW crews.

MTA expects to start the implementation of all these projects by March 2010 and to complete the projects by June 2012. All planning and design work will be performed by MTA and the construction work will be done by city forces. Prioritization Implementation - Local Streets is a sub-category in the 5YPP for the Traffic Calming category. According to prioritization criteria, plans that are formally adopted by the City become eligible for implementation or construction funds. Such plans are project-ready and have been fully vetted through an intensive community process. The measures included in this current request have been identified through the planning process and are phased so

No. 3

3

that the least intrusive and least expensive are implemented first, before moving on to more drastic measures. For example, speed humps are usually the first treatment on a particular block. If speeding is not addressed with the hump installation, then a subsequent funding request would be made for a physical change in the roadway configuration either through bulbouts, chicanes, islands, or partial closures.

No. 3

Prop K FY 09/10 Traffic Calming ImplementationSummary by Device Type

Bulb-outs

Project Measure

Circular Judson/Circular/Paulding - 2Crestlake 34th Ave at Yorba St - 1Excelsior Persia at Munich - 1Excelsior Persia/Dublin Gateway Treatment - 1 Excelsior Madrid/Russia - 1

Holloway/Garfield Holloway at Junipero Serra - 2North Bernal Heights Alabama/Mullen - 1

Potrero Hill Rhode Island at Southern Heights - 1Roosevelt/Buena Vista/ 17th St Buena Vista Ave at Upper Ter - 1

South Bernal Heights Crescent at Murray - 2

Islands

Project Measure

18th Avenue 17th Ave Choker (L-I) - 1Crestlake Crestlake Dr at Wawona St - Island - 2Fillmore Webster at Ellis - Median Extension/Thumbnail Island - 2

Central Richmond 23rd Ave/Anza St - Traffic Circle - 1Central Richmond Cabrillo St/Funston Ave Island - 1 Central Richmond 14th Ave/Lake St Island - 1Central Richmond 14th Ave/Cabrillo St Island - 1Central Richmond 17th Ave btwn Anza & Balboa Island - 1Central Richmond 17th Ave btwn Anza & Geary Island - 1

O'Shaughnessy Build Out Median near Bosworth - 1Potrero Hill 18th St btwn Carolina and Wisconsin - Chicane - 2Potrero Hill Mariposa at Vermont - Gateway Island - 1Potrero Hill Mariposa at Pennsylvania - Gateway Island - 1Potrero Hill Rhode Island at Southern Heights - Island - 1

Roosevelt/Buena Vista/ 17th St 17th Street at Corbin Pl Steps - Median Island - 1Roosevelt/Buena Vista/ 17th St Roosevelt from Museum Way to Park Hill Ter/15th St - Chicane - 1Roosevelt/Buena Vista/ 17th St Roosevelt at Park Hill/15th St - Two Islands - 1

St. Francis Wood Santa Ana Ave at San Anselmo and Portola Dr Channelization - 1St. Francis Wood Yerba Buena Ave at San Pablo Ave Island - 1

Sunnyside Intersection of Joost and Lippard Median Island - 1Sunnyside Intersection of Joost and Monterey Expand Median - 1Sunnyside Intersection of Monterey Boulevard and Circular Expand Median - 1Teresita Teresita Chokers Ph 2 - 8

West Portal 14th Ave Choker - Vicente to Ulloa - 1

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F1a-Scope page 5 of 31

No. 3

Speed Humps/Cushions

Project Measure

Bayview Palou (SC), bet Lane and Keith - 2 Bayview Van Dyke, bet Lane and Keith - 2Bayview Oakdale (bet Lane and Keith) - 2

Cedro/Cerritos Cedro between Ocean and Moncada - replace bump with hump - 1Cedro/Cerritos Paloma between Ocean and Moncada - replace bumps with hump - 1

Crestlake 34th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona St - 1Crestlake 35th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona St - 1Crestlake 36th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona Sts - 1Crestlake Crestlake Dr btwn Yorba St and Wawona St - 1Crestlake 34th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente - 1 Crestlake 35th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente - 1 Crestlake 36th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente - 1Crestlake Crestlake Dr btwn Constanso Wy and El Mirasol Pl - 1Crestlake Escolta Way btwn 33rd Ave and 31st Ave - 1Crestlake Wawona St btwn 33rd Ave and 30th Ave - 1

Central Richmond 17th Ave btwn Balboa & Cabrillo Sts - 1Central Richmond 18th Ave btwn Balboa & Cabrillo Sts - 1

Potrero Hill 19th St btwn Carolina and Wisconsin - 1St. Francis Wood San Benito Wy btwn Portola Dr and St. Francis Blvd - 1St. Francis Wood San Benito Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Monterey Blvd - 1St. Francis Wood Santa Clara Ave btwn St. Francis Blvd and San Anselmo Ave - 1St. Francis Wood San Fernando Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Portola Dr - 1St. Francis Wood San Fernando Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Monterey - 1St. Francis Wood San Pablo Ave btwn Yerba Buena Ave and Santa Monica Wy - 1St. Francis Wood San Pablo Ave btwn Santa Monica Wy and Portola Dr - 1

Sunnyside Hearst Ave between Baden and Congo - 1Sunnyside Flood Ave between Detroit and Edna - 1Sunnyside Mangels Ave between Foerster and Gennessee - 1Sunnyside Mangels Ave between Foerster and Detroit - 1Sunnyside Hearst Ave between Foerster and Gennessee - 1Sunnyside Staples Street between Foerster and Gennessee - 1Sunnyside Joost Ave between Edna and Foerster - 1Sunnyside Mangels Ave between Detroit and Congo - 1

Other Measures

Project Measure

Fillmore

Fillmore at Ellis - Ped Visibility Improvements including red zones along the curb, signage, and pavement markings to improve sightlines and yielding between pedestrians and motorists

Fillmore

Webster at Ellis - Ped Visibility Improvements including red zones along the curb, signage, and pavement markings to improve sightlines and yielding between pedestrians and motorists

Holloway/Garfield Holloway between Beverly and Head - chicanes/edgelines (painted trial)Randolph-Broad Edgelines

Roosevelt/Buena Vista/ 17th St 17th Street from Temple to Ord Sts - EB - Speed-Radar Sign

Sunnyside

Operational improvements - various locations:Congo St btwn Stillings and Martha red zone, Acadia at Joost tall vehicle

restriction, Monterey and Circular yield sign and teeth, WS Forester north of Monterey block off driveway, Monterey at Edna center STOP

Sunnyside Joost between Acadia and Lippard 90 degree parking

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F1a-Scope page 6 of 31

No. 3

Prop K FY 09/10 Traffic Calming ImplementationSummary by Planning Project

18th Avenue Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure17th Ave Choker (L-I) 2 Island

Bayview Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasurePalou (SC), bet Lane and Keith 1 Speed HumpsVan Dyke, bet Lane and Keith 1 Speed HumpsOakdale (bet Lane and Keith) 1 Speed Humps

Bernal Heights Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureAlabama/Mullen Bulb 5 BulboutsCrescent Bulb-outs (Murray) 2 Bulbouts

Cedro/Cerritos Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureCedro between Ocean and Moncada - replace bump with hump 1 Speed HumpsPaloma between Ocean and Moncada - replace bumps with hump 1 Speed Humps

Central Richmond Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure17th Ave btwn Balboa & Cabrillo Sts 1 Speed Humps18th Ave btwn Balboa & Cabrillo Sts 1 Speed Humps23rd Ave/Anza St - traffic circle 1 IslandCabrillo St/Funston Ave 1 Island14th Ave/Lake St 1 Island14th Ave/Cabrillo St 1 Island17th Ave btwn Anza & Balboa 1 Island17th Ave btwn Balboa & Geary 1 Island

Circular Avenue Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureReconfigure Judson/Circular/Paulding 3 Bulbouts

Crestlake Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure34th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona St 1 Speed Humps35th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona St 1 Speed Humps36th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona Sts 1 Speed HumpsCrestlake Dr btwn Yorba St and Wawona St 1 Speed Humps34th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente 1 Speed Humps35th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente 1 Speed Humps36th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente 1 Speed HumpsCrestlake Dr btwn Constanso Wy and El Mirasol Pl 1 Speed HumpsCrestlake Dr at Wawona St - island 1 Island34th Ave at Yorba St - bulb outs 1 BulboutsEscolta Way btwn 33rd Ave and 31st Ave 1 Speed HumpsWawona St btwn 33rd Ave and 30th Ave 1 Speed Humps

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F1b-Scope page 7 of 31

No. 3

Excelsior Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasurePersia Bulbouts (@Munich) 3 BulboutsPersia/Dublin gateway treatment 3 BulboutsMadrid/Russia Bulbouts NE Corner Only (Playground) 3 Bulbouts

Fillmore Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureFillmore at Ellis - Ped Visibility Improvements 1 OtherWebster at Ellis - Ped Visibility Improvements 1 OtherWebster at Ellis - Median Extension/Thumbnail Island 2 Island

Holloway/Garfield Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureHolloway at Junipero Serra - bulb outs 1 Bulbouts

Holloway between Beverly and Head - chicanes/edgelines (painted trial) 1 Other

O'Shaughnessy Boulevard Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureBuild out median 2 Island

Potrero Hill Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure18th St btwn Carolina and Wisconsin - chicane 1 Island19th St btwn Carolina and Wisconsin - speed hump 1 Speed HumpsMariposa at Vermont - gateway island 1 IslandMariposa at Pennsylvania - gateway island 1 IslandRhode Island at Southern Heights - bulbout 1 BulboutsRhode Island at Southern Heights - island 1 Island

Randolph-Broad Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureEdgelines 1 Other


No. 3

Roosevelt Way/Buena Vista Avenue/17th Street Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure17th Street at Corbin Pl Steps - Median Island 1 Island17th Street from Temple to Ord Sts - EB - Speed-Radar Sign 1 OtherRoosevelt from Museum Way to Park Hill Ter/15th St - Chicane 1 IslandRoosevelt at Park Hill/15th St - Two Islands 1 IslandBuena Vista Ave at Upper Ter - Bulb-out 1 Bulbouts

St. Francis Wood Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureSan Benito Wy btwn Portola Dr and St. Francis Blvd hump 1 Speed HumpsSan Benito Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Monterey Blvd hump 1 Speed HumpsSanta Ana Ave at San Anselmo and Portola Dr channelization 1 Island

Santa Clara Ave btwn St. Francis Blvd and San Anselmo Ave hump 1 Speed HumpsSan Fernando Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Portola Dr hump 1 Speed HumpsSan Fernando Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Monterey hump 1 Speed Humps

San Pablo Ave btwn Yerba Buena Ave and Santa Monica Wy hump 1 Speed HumpsSan Pablo Ave btwn Santa Monica Wy and Portola Dr hump 1 Speed HumpsYerba Buena Ave at San Pablo Ave island 1 Island

Sunnyside Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureOperational improvements - various locations:Congo St btwn Stillings and Martha red zone, Acadia at Joost tall veh restriction, Monterey and Circular yield sign and teeth, WS Forester north of Monterey block off driveway, Monterey at Edna center STOP marking 1 OtherHearst Ave between Baden and Congo 1 Speed HumpsFlood Ave between Detroit and Edna 1 Speed HumpsMangels Ave between Foerster and Gennessee 1 Speed HumpsMangels Ave between Foerster and Detroit 1 Speed HumpsHearst Ave between Foerster and Gennessee 1 Speed HumpsStaples Street between Foerster and Gennessee 1 Speed HumpsJoost Ave between Edna and Foerster 1 Speed HumpsMangels Ave between Detroit and Congo 1 Speed HumpsIntersection of Joost and Lippard median island 1 IslandIntersection of Joost and Monterey expand median 1 IslandIntersection of Monterey Boulevard and Circular expand median 1 IslandJoost between Acadia and Lippard 90 degree parking 1 Other

Teresita Boulevard Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureTeresita Chokers Ph 2 2 Island

West Portal Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure14th Ave Choker - Vicente to Ulloa 3 Island


No. 3

Prop K FY 09/10 Traffic Calming ImplementationSummary by Supervisorial District

District 1Central Richmond Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure17th Ave btwn Balboa & Cabrillo Sts 1 Speed Humps18th Ave btwn Balboa & Cabrillo Sts 1 Speed Humps23rd Ave/Anza St - traffic circle 1 IslandCabrillo St/Funston Ave 1 Island14th Ave/Lake St 1 Island14th Ave/Cabrillo St 1 Island17th Ave btwn Anza & Balboa 1 Island17th Ave btwn Balboa & Geary 1 Island

District 4Crestlake Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure34th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona St 1 Speed Humps35th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona St 1 Speed Humps36th Ave btwn Yorba St and Wawona Sts 1 Speed HumpsCrestlake Dr btwn Yorba St and Wawona St 1 Speed Humps34th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente 1 Speed Humps35th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente 1 Speed Humps36th Ave btwn Wawona St and Vicente 1 Speed HumpsCrestlake Dr btwn Constanso Wy and El Mirasol Pl 1 Speed HumpsCrestlake Dr at Wawona St - island 1 Island34th Ave at Yorba St - bulb outs 1 BulboutsEscolta Way btwn 33rd Ave and 31st Ave 1 Speed HumpsWawona St btwn 33rd Ave and 30th Ave 1 Speed Humps

District 5

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F1c-Scope page 10 of 31

18th Avenue Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure17th Ave Choker (L-I) 2 Island

Fillmore Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureFillmore at Ellis - Ped Visibility Improvements 1 OtherWebster at Ellis - Ped Visibility Improvements 1 OtherWebster at Ellis - Median Extension/Thumbnail Island 2 Island

District 7Cedro/Cerritos Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureCedro between Ocean and Moncada - replace bump with hump 1 Speed HumpsPaloma between Ocean and Moncada - replace bumps with hump 1 Speed Humps

Circular Avenue Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureReconfigure Judson/Circular/Paulding 3 Bulbouts


No. 3

Holloway/Garfield Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureHolloway at Junipero Serra - bulb outs 1 Bulbouts

Holloway between Beverly and Head - chicanes/edgelines (painted trial) 1 Other

O'Shaughnessy Boulevard Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureBuild out median 2 Island

Randolph-Broad Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureEdgelines 1 Other

St. Francis Wood Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureSan Benito Wy btwn Portola Dr and St. Francis Blvd hump 1 Speed HumpsSan Benito Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Monterey Blvd hump 1 Speed HumpsSanta Ana Ave at San Anselmo and Portola Dr channelization 1 Island

Santa Clara Ave btwn St. Francis Blvd and San Anselmo Ave hump 1 Speed HumpsSan Fernando Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Portola Dr hump 1 Speed HumpsSan Fernando Wy btwn St. Francis Blvd and Monterey hump 1 Speed Humps

San Pablo Ave btwn Yerba Buena Ave and Santa Monica Wy hump 1 Speed HumpsSan Pablo Ave btwn Santa Monica Wy and Portola Dr hump 1 Speed HumpsYerba Buena Ave at San Pablo Ave island 1 Island

Sunnyside Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureOperational improvements - various locations:Congo St btwn Stillings and Martha red zone, Acadia at Joost tall veh restriction, Monterey and Circular yield sign and teeth, WS Forester


restriction, Monterey and Circular yield sign and teeth, WS Forester north of Monterey block off driveway, Monterey at Edna center STOP mar 1 OtherHearst Ave between Baden and Congo 1 Speed HumpsFlood Ave between Detroit and Edna 1 Speed HumpsMangels Ave between Foerster and Gennessee 1 Speed HumpsMangels Ave between Foerster and Detroit 1 Speed HumpsHearst Ave between Foerster and Gennessee 1 Speed HumpsStaples Street between Foerster and Gennessee 1 Speed HumpsJoost Ave between Edna and Foerster 1 Speed HumpsMangels Ave between Detroit and Congo 1 Speed HumpsIntersection of Joost and Lippard median island 1 IslandIntersection of Joost and Monterey expand median 1 IslandIntersection of Monterey Boulevard and Circular expand median 1 IslandJoost between Acadia and Lippard 90 degree parking 1 Other

Teresita Boulevard Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureTeresita Chokers Ph 2 2 Island

West Portal Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure14th Ave Choker - Vicente to Ulloa 3 Island


No. 3

District 8Roosevelt Way/Buena Vista Avenue/17th Street Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure17th Street at Corbin Pl Steps - Median Island 1 Island17th Street from Temple to Ord Sts - EB - Speed-Radar Sign 1 OtherRoosevelt from Museum Way to Park Hill Ter/15th St - Chicane 1 IslandRoosevelt at Park Hill/15th St - Two Islands 1 IslandBuena Vista Ave at Upper Ter - Bulb-out 1 Bulbouts

District 9Bernal Heights Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasureAlabama/Mullen Bulb 5 BulboutsCrescent Bulb-outs (Murray) 2 Bulbouts

District 10Bayview Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasurePalou (SC), bet Lane and Keith 1 Speed HumpsVan Dyke, bet Lane and Keith 1 Speed HumpsOakdale (bet Lane and Keith) 1 Speed Humps

Potrero Hill Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase Measure18th St btwn Carolina and Wisconsin - chicane 1 Island19th St btwn Carolina and Wisconsin - speed hump 1 Speed HumpsMariposa at Vermont - gateway island 1 IslandMariposa at Pennsylvania - gateway island 1 IslandRhode Island at Southern Heights - bulbout 1 BulboutsRhode Island at Southern Heights - island 1 Island


District 11Excelsior Areawide Traffic Calming ProjectLocation Phase MeasurePersia Bulbouts (@Munich) 3 BulboutsPersia/Dublin gateway treatment 3 BulboutsMadrid/Russia Bulbouts NE Corner Only (Playground) 3 Bulbouts


No. 3


FY 2009/10

Project Name:


ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE

Type : Completion Date

(mm/dd/yy)

Status:

Start Date End DateQuarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

3 2009/10 1 2011/12

3 2009/10 1 2011/12Prepare Bid Documents

N/A N/A

Design Engineering (PS&E)

Planning/Conceptual Engineering

R/W Activities/Acquisition

Ad rti C tr ti



Categorically Exempt

Environmental Studies (PA&ED)

PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES

N/A

Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2008/09). Additonal schedule detail may be provided in the text box below.

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 2-Schedule Form v. 0809 Page 13 of 31

N/A N/A4 2009/10 N/A N/A

N/A N/A 4 2011/12Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) 4 2011/12

Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock)Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use)

Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (e.g., Award Contract)

Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2008/09). Additonal schedule detail may be provided in the text box below.

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 2-Schedule Form v. 0809 Page 13 of 31

No. 3


Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant.

SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES

SFMTA inputs its projects in DPW's 5 Year Plan for street resurfacing online database to identify potential conflicts and joint opportunities. SFMTA also reviews DPW's 2 Year Paving Plan for more immediate coordination. Paving plans sometimes shift, but as of December 2009 the following partial list of paving projects may provide some coordination possibilities:

Folsom Street (10th Street to 19th Street): Contract Award - January 2010, Notice to Proceed - March 2010, Paving Complete - July 2010

Williams Avenue (3rd Street to Phelps Street): Contract Award - February 2010, Notice to Proceed - April 2010, Paving Complete - August 2010

O'Shaughnessy Boulevard (Portola Drive to Bosworth Street): Contract Award - March 2010, Notice to Proceed - May 2010, Paving Complete - September 2010

Holloway Avenue (Harold Avenue to Junipero Serra Boulevard): Contract Award - January 2011, Notice to Proceed - March 2011, Paving Complete - July 2011

Folsom Street (19th Street to Cesar Chavez Street): Contract Award - January 2011, Notice to Proceed - March 2011, Paving Complete - July 2011

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 2-Schedule Form v. 0809 Page 14 of 31P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 2-Schedule Form v. 0809 Page 14 of 31

No. 3


FY 2009/10

Project Name:


COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST

Cost for Current Request/Phase

Yes/No Total CostYes

Yes

Yes

Environmental Studies (PA&ED)Design Engineering (PS&E)R/W Activities/Acquisition


ConstructionProcurement (e.g. rolling stock)


Operations


$135,406

$1,760,075

$2 085 450 $2 085 450

Prop K - Current Request

$1,760,075

$189,969

$135,406

$189,969

Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

In the table below provide information just for the phase or phases included in the CURRENT Prop K request. For instance, if the request is for Phase 1 of a planning study, just show the total cost for Phase 1 and the amount of Prop K funds requested for Phase 1.

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 3-Cost Form v. 0809 Page 15 of 31

COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT

Total Cost Source of Cost Estimate$189,969

$135,406

$1,760,075

$2,085,450 Expected Useful Life: 20 Years

ConstructionProcurement (e.g. rolling stock)

Environmental Studies (PA&ED)

R/W Activities/Acquisition

Engineer's estimate based on prior projects


Total:


Operations

Design Engineering (PS&E)

$2,085,450 $2,085,450


Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number).

Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

In the table below provide information just for the phase or phases included in the CURRENT Prop K request. For instance, if the request is for Phase 1 of a planning study, just show the total cost for Phase 1 and the amount of Prop K funds requested for Phase 1.

Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliablity the farther along a project is in its development.

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 3-Cost Form v. 0809 Page 15 of 31

No. 3

DPW Construction/Material Cost Per DeviceSpeed Humps/Cushions 4,000$ Traffic Islands/Chicanes 10,000$ Bulbouts/Gateways 50,000$

Device Quantity Equivalent*

Project Development

(15%)

Conceptual Engineering

(10%)

Design Engineering

(10%)Contingency (10%),

Monitoring (15%)MTA Staff Labor

Cost**DPW Construction/

Materials

Total Cost (Staff Labor + Construction/

Materials) 18th Avenue Traffic Calming Implementation

Traffic Island/Chicanes 1 1.5 1,500$ 1,500$ 3,750$ 6,750$ 15,000$ 21,750$

Bayview Traffic Calming ImplementationSpeed Humps/Cushions 6 1 3,600$ 2,400$ 2,400$ 6,000$ 14,400$ 24,000$ 38,400$

Central Richmond Traffic CalmingImplementationSpeed Humps/Cushions 2 1 1,200$ 800$ 800$ 2,000$ 4,800$ 8,000$ 12,800$ Traffic Island/Chicanes 6 1.67 10,000$ 10,000$ 25,000$ 45,000$ 100,000$ 145,000$

157,800$ Cerritos-Cedro Traffic Calming Implementation

Speed Humps/Cushions 2 1 1 200$ 800$ 800$ 2 000$ 4 800$ 8 000$ 12 800$

MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET

1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide task-level budget information.2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies.4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below.

Speed Humps/Cushions 2 1 1,200$ 800$ 800$ 2,000$ 4,800$ 8,000$ 12,800$

Circular Traffic Calming ImplementationBulbouts/Gateways 2 1 10,000$ 10,000$ 25,000$ 45,000$ 100,000$ 145,000$

Crestlake Traffic Calming ImplementationSpeed Humps/Cushions 10 1 6,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 10,000$ 24,000$ 40,000$ 64,000$ Traffic Island/Chicanes 2 1 2,000$ 2,000$ 5,000$ 9,000$ 20,000$ 29,000$ Bulbouts/Gateways 1 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 12,500$ 22,500$ 50,000$ 72,500$

165,500$ Excelsior Traffic Calming Implementation

Bulbouts/Gateways 3 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 37,500$ 67,500$ 150,000$ 217,500$

1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide task-level budget information.2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies.4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below.

No. 3


Project Development

(15%)


(10%)

Design Engineering




Materials


Materials) Fillmore Traffic Calming Implementation

Traffic Island/Chicanes 2 1 2,000$ 2,000$ 5,000$ 9,000$ 20,000$ 29,000$ Ped Improvements 2 1 1,600$ 1,067$ 2,667$ 5,333$ 10,667$ 16,000$

45,000$ Holloway-Garfield Traffic Calming Implementation

Bulbouts/Gateways 2 1 10,000$ 10,000$ 25,000$ 45,000$ 100,000$ 145,000$ Traffic Island/Chicanes 1 1 2,500$ 1,667$ 4,167$ 8,333$ 16,667$ 25,000$

170,000$ North Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation


O'Shaughnessy Traffic Calming Implementation Traffic Island/Chicanes 6 1 6,000$ 6,000$ 15,000$ 27,000$ 60,000$ 87,000$

Potrero Hill Traffic Calming ImplementationSpeed Humps/Cushions 1 1 600$ 400$ 400$ 1,000$ 2,400$ 4,000$ 6,400$ Traffic Island/Chicanes 5 1.2 6,000$ 6,000$ 15,000$ 27,000$ 60,000$ 87,000$ Bulbouts/Gateways 1 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 12,500$ 22,500$ 50,000$ 72,500$

165,900$ Randolph-Broad Traffic Calming Implementation

Edgelines 1 1 2,000$ 1,333$ 3,333$ 6,667$ 13,333$ 20,000$

Roosevelt/Buena Vista/17th Street Traffic Calming ImplementationBulbouts/Gateways 5 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 12,500$ 22,500$ 50,000$ 72,500$ Traffic Island/Chicanes 1 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 12,500$ 22,500$ 50,000$ 72,500$ Radar Sign 1 1 1,500$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 2,500$ 6,000$ 10,000$ 16,000$

161,000$ St. Francis Wood Traffic Calming ImplementationSt. Francis Wood Traffic Calming Implementation

Speed Humps/Cushions 7 1 4,200$ 2,800$ 2,800$ 7,000$ 16,800$ 28,000$ 44,800$ Traffic Island/Chicanes 2 1 2,000$ 2,000$ 5,000$ 9,000$ 20,000$ 29,000$

73,800$ South Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation


Sunnyside Traffic Calming ImplementationSpeed Humps/Cushions 8 1 4,800$ 3,200$ 3,200$ 8,000$ 19,200$ 32,000$ 51,200$ Traffic Island/Chicanes 3 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 7,500$ 13,500$ 30,000$ 43,500$ Operational Improvements 1 1 1,000$ 667$ 1,667$ 3,333$ 6,667$ 10,000$ Operational Improvements 1 1 1,000$ 667$ 1,667$ 3,333$ 6,667$ 10,000$

114,700$ Teresita Traffic Calming Implementation

Traffic Island/Chicanes 8 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 20,000$ 36,000$ 80,000$ 116,000$

West Portal Traffic Calming Implementation Traffic Island/Chicanes 1 1 1,000$ 1,000$ 2,500$ 4,500$ 10,000$ 14,500$

No. 3


Project Development

(15%)


(10%)

Design Engineering




Materials


Materials) Sunset District Pilot Implementation

Traffic Circle 1 1 12,700$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 12,500$ 35,200$ 50,000$ 85,200$

Early Implementation/Spot Improvements TBD 1 1 5,263$ 3,506$ 3,506$ 8,765$ 21,040$ 35,060$ 56,100$

SUBTOTAL 99 49,163$ 140,806$ 135,406$ 352,015$ 677,390$ 1,408,060$ 2,085,450$ % of Construction 3% 10% 10% 25% 48%* Equivalence is used to modify the cost estimate based on an engineer's assessment that the specific project is larger then a typical treatment.** See next page for a breakdown of staff labor costs by traffic calming device.

No. 3

MTA Staff Costs for Implementing Measures (includes Project Development, Design, Construction Engineering, Contingency and Monitoring per measure)

Per Vertical Deflection Type Measure (Speed humps, cushions)

PositionUnburdened

SalaryOverhead Multiplier

Fully Burdened Salary No. of Hours

FTE Ratio Total Cost

5211 - Sr Engineer $ 144,456 2.37 $ 342,361 1 0.0004 $ 137 5241 - Engineer $ 124,774 2.37 $ 295,714 2 0.0010 $ 296 5203 - Asst Engineer $ 92,716 2.37 $ 219,737 4 0.0020 $ 439 5289 - Planner III $ 97,760 2.37 $ 231,691 6 0.0030 $ 695 5381 - Intern I $ 53,818 1.5 $ 80,727 2 0.0010 $ 81 5362 - Engineer Asst $ 69,160 2.37 $ 163,909 6 0.0030 $ 492 1424 - Clerk Typist $ 49,764 2.37 $ 117,941 5 0.0022 $ 259 Total per Measure 26 0.0100 2,399$ Total per Measure (rounded) 2,400$

Per Traffic Island/Chicane

PositionUnburdened




5211 - Sr Engineer $ 144,456 2.37 $ 342,361 1 0.0004 $ 137 5241 - Engineer $ 124,774 2.37 $ 295,714 3 0.0016 $ 473 5203 - Asst Engineer $ 92,716 2.37 $ 219,737 12 0.0060 $ 1,318 5289 - Planner III $ 97,760 2.37 $ 231,691 8 0.0040 $ 927 5381 - Intern I $ 53,818 1.5 $ 80,727 6 0.0030 $ 242 5362 - Engineer Asst $ 69,160 2.37 $ 163,909 17 0.0080 $ 1,311 1424 - Clerk Typist $ 49,764 2.37 $ 117,941 2 0.0008 $ 94 Total per Measure 50 0.0226 4,503$ Total per Measure (rounded) 4,500$

Per Bulb-Out/Gateway

PositionUnburdened




5211 - Sr Engineer $ 144,456 2.37 $ 342,361 17 0.0080 $ 2,739 5241 - Engineer $ 124,774 2.37 $ 295,714 29 0.0140 $ 4,140 5203 - Asst Engineer $ 92,716 2.37 $ 219,737 62 0.0300 $ 6,592 5289 - Planner III $ 97,760 2.37 $ 231,691 42 0.0200 $ 4,634 5381 - Intern I $ 53,818 1.50 $ 80,727 21 0.0100 $ 807 5362 - Engineer Asst $ 69,160 2.37 $ 163,909 42 0.0200 $ 3,278 1424 - Clerk Typist $ 49,764 2.37 $ 117,941 4 0.0020 $ 236 Total per Measure 216 0.0940 22,426$ Total per Measure (rounded) 22,500$

No. 3


FY

Project Name:


FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST

Prop K Funds Requested:

5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate)

Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY:

2009/10

$2,085,450

$2,666,450


$2,243,450


If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels.

The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the Prop K funding programmed in Fiscal Year 2009/10 for Traffic Calming Implementation ($2,008,450) and Traffic Calming Early Implementation/Action ($235,000) in the 2009 5YPP for Traffic Calming. The $2,085,450 allocation requires several amendments to the 5YPP to shift funding among projects. See attached 5YPP amendment for details.

The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Traffic Calming category in Fiscal Year 2009/10.

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 5-Funding Form v. 0809 Page 20 of 31

Programmed$2,085,450

$2,085,450

Prop K Match % - Current Request:Total from Cost worksheet

$2,085,450

$0 $0

Fund Source Allocated TotalPlanned

$0

$0$0

$2,085,450$0

$0

$0$0

100.00%

$0$0

$2,085,450Total:

Prop K sales tax

Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet.

If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels.

The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the Prop K funding programmed in Fiscal Year 2009/10 for Traffic Calming Implementation ($2,008,450) and Traffic Calming Early Implementation/Action ($235,000) in the 2009 5YPP for Traffic Calming. The $2,085,450 allocation requires several amendments to the 5YPP to shift funding among projects. See attached 5YPP amendment for details.

The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Traffic Calming category in Fiscal Year 2009/10.


No. 3


Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No

Required Local Match%

FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES)

Programmed

$0

Prop K Match % - Entire Project:Total from Cost worksheet

FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST

100.00%

$0

$ Amount $

$0

$0.00

$0Total

$0

$0.00

Allocated

$0

$0

Planned

$0

$0

$2,085,450

$0

$0

$0

$0$0

Fund Source

Fund Source

Total:

Entire the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet.


FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST

Prop K Funds Requested:

Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule% Reimbursed

Annually

20%40%40%0%0%

$2,085,450

$0

$2,085,450

$834,180

Cash Flow

$0

$834,180

$0

$834,180$417,090 $1,668,360

Balance

FY 2009/10

Total:

FY 2010/11FY 2011/12

Fiscal Year

Entire the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet.

Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan.


No. 3


This section is to be completed by Authority Staff.

Last Updated: 02.02.10 Resolution. No. Res. Date:

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:Phase:

Prop K Recommended: AllocationAllocationAllocation

Total:

Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation)EP

Line%

Reimbursable

38 25%38 39%38 36% 0%

0%100%

Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation)EP

Line Fiscal YearMaximum

Reimbursement

38 FY 2009/10 $91,86938 FY 2009/10 $59,26638 FY 2009/10 $376,63638 FY 2010/11 $65,40038 FY 2010/11 $50,76038 FY 2010/11 $691,72038 FY 2011/12 $32,70038 FY 2011/12 $25,38038 FY 2011/12 $691,719

$2,085,450

Prop K Fund Expiration Date: Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date.

33%

33%

2% $717,099$691,719

$01%

$1,993,581Planning/Conceptual EngineeringPhase

$749,799

Balance

FY 2010/11

$0

Design Engineering (PS&E)Planning/Conceptual Engineering

Construction



Cumulative % Reimbursable

$2,085,450

12/31/2012

4%

$749,799

FY 2011/12 $749,799 $0

Total: $2,085,450

ConstructionDesign Engineering (PS&E)Planning/Conceptual EngineeringConstruction

BalanceFiscal Year Maximum

Reimbursement

$135,406$1,760,075

AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION

Total:

Notes (e.g.,justification for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-EP line item or multi-sponsor recommendations):

$0

$527,771 $1,557,679

Amount$189,969

$807,880FY 2009/10

$1,934,315$1,557,679$1,492,279$1,441,519

3%18%

Design Engineering (PS&E)ConstructionPlanning/Conceptual EngineeringDesign Engineering (PS&E)

3%2%

A multi-phase allocation is appropriate given the straightforward nature of the proposed improvements (e.g. speed humps), and the short duration and low cost of the project development phases.

See Note #1

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 6-Authority Rec Form v. 0809 Page 22 of 31




Project Name:

Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT)



Action Fiscal Year PhaseFuture Commitment to:

Trigger:

Deliverables:1.

2.

3.

4.

Amount

Quarterly progress reports shall include the percent complete for each of the 21 projects (e.g. the 19 planning projects, the Sunset Traffic Circle, and the early action/spot improvements), the status of the remaining scope, and the current or revised project budgets (See Special Condition #2), in addition to the standard contents as described in the Standard Grant Agreement.

Upon project completion, provide 2-3 digital before/after photos of typical completed improvements for each sub-project.

Sunset Traffic Circle Project: Upon completion of the design phase (ANTICIPATED DATE PENDING), MTA will provide evidence of completion of design (e.g. copy of signed certification page or striping drawing). See Special Condition #3.

Early Implementation/Spot Improvements: Before expenses are incurred, MTA must submit the locations and treatments identified for implementation to Authority staff. See Special Condition #4.

5.

Special Conditions:1.

2.

3.

4.

The recommended allocation is contingent upon a concurrent 5YPP amendment for the Traffic Calming category. See attached 5YPP amendment for details.

sub-project.

Upon project completion, provide electronic GIS shapefiles that are compatible with the Authority's GIS system depicting the location of the project and types of improvements.

Sunset Traffic Circle: MTA may not incur expenses for the construction phase of the Sunset Traffic Circle project until Authority staff releases the Prop K construction funds ($62,500), pending receipt of Deliverable #2.

Traffic Calming Implementation Project: MTA may modify the budgets for the 19 traffic calming planning projects contained in this sub-project (as detailed in the Major Line Item Budget Section) by up to 20% as long as the overall sub-project budget remains unchanged. MTA must seek approval in advance from Authority staff for increases of more than 20% to individual planning project budgets.

Early Implementation/Spot Improvements: MTA may not incur expenses for the design ($3,506) or construction ($43,825) phases for the Early Implementation/Spot Improvements sub-project until it has submitted the locations and treatments identified for implementation to Authority staff. The Prop K funds for this project are intended for the early implementation of traffic calming planning projects that are currently underway and expected to be completed in FY 2010/11 (e.g. Minna/Natoma, South Silver Terrace and Folsom).


No. 3




Project Name:




5.

6.

7.

Notes:1. Amount eligible for reimbursement by phase in a given fiscal year may vary as long as the maximum

reimbursed annually does not exceed the approved cash flow distribution schedule by fiscal year.

Pending Authority approval of MTA's proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI.

The Authority will not reimburse funds for the following projects until it has received the final deliverables for the following traffic calming planning projects as required by the corresponding planning phase allocation (Res. 08-13, 138.907026-35): Buena Vista/Roosevelt Way/17th Street, Sunnyside, Crestlake, St. Francis Wood and Fillmore. Traffic Calming planning project documents should include: 1) a brief description of the issue or problem addressed by the project; 2) a brief description of the public involvement and technical analyses that took place; 3) the recommended implementation strategy, including a list of recommended measures by stage or phase, the performance measure results that would trigger a decision to implement the stage or phase, a budget/cost estimate by stage or phase, a funding plan and an implementation schedule (which at a minimum includes start and end dates for design and implementation, with larger projects having schedule milestones by stage or phase).

DPW costs will not be reimbursed until the Authority has received labor details to support the construction cost estimates.

Supervisorial District(s): Citywide

Sub-project detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for sub-project detail.

TA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA:

reimbursed annually does not exceed the approved cash flow distribution schedule by fiscal year.


No. 3




Project Name:




Sub-Project # from SGA: Name:

Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation)

EP Line Fiscal Year

Maximum Reimbursement

38 FY 2009/10 $65,40038 FY 2009/10 $50,76038 FY 2009/10 $330,75038 FY 2010/11 $65,40038 FY 2010/11 $50,760

Design Engineering (PS&E) 6% $1,969,290

SUB-PROJECT DETAIL

Traffic Calming Implementation

PhaseCumulative % Reimbursable

3% $2,020,050Balance


Construction 21% $1,638,540Planning/Conceptual Engineering 3% $1,573,140Design Engineering (PS&E) 6% $1,522,380

1. Print this page only if the recommendation includes multiple subjects (e.g. 5 bike projects covered by one allocation). Replicate table as needed for additional sub-projects. 2. If deliverables or special conditions apply to a particular sub-project, be sure to note that specifically in the prior section, as well as below as needed for clarity.3. Be sure that total recommended allocation/appropriation, amounts by fiscal year, etc. match prior page.

38 FY 2010/11 $661,50038 FY 2011/12 $32,70038 FY 2011/12 $25,38038 FY 2011/12 $661,500

$1,944,150



EP Line Fiscal Year


38 FY 2009/10 $17,70038 FY 2009/10 $5,00038 FY 2009/10 $22,94338 FY 2010/11 $19,77938 FY 2011/12 $19,778

$85,200

Planning/Conceptual Engineering 2% $828,180

Total:

Design Engineering (PS&E) 3% $802,800Construction

Construction 4% $2,000,250

Planning/Conceptual Engineering 1% $2,067,750Design Engineering (PS&E)

2% $2,039,807Construction 3% $2,020,028

88% $141,300

PhaseCumulative % Reimbursable Balance

Sunset Traffic Circle

Total:

Construction1% $2,062,750

Construction 59% $860,880


No. 3




Project Name:






EP Line Fiscal Year


38 FY 2009/10 $8,76938 FY 2009/10 $3,50638 FY 2009/10 $22,94338 FY 2010/11 $10,44138 FY 2011/12 $10,441

$56,100

Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance

Design Engineering (PS&E) 1% $2,073,175Planning/Conceptual Engineering 0% $2,076,681

Early Implementation/Spot Improvements

Phase

Construction 2% $2,050,232Construction 2% $2,039,791Construction 3% $2,029,350

Total:


No. 3


P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 7-Maps.etc Form v. 0809 Page 27 of 31P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 7-Maps.etc Form v. 0809 Page 27 of 31

No. 3


ranc

isco

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 7-Maps.etc Form v. 0809 Page 28 of 31

Auth

ority

Not

e: S

outh

wes

t Sec

tor o

f San

Fra

ncis

co


No. 3



Auth

ority

Not

e: E

astS

ecto

r of S

an F

ranc

isco


No. 3


Fran

cisco


Auth

ority

Not

e: N

orth

west

Sec

tor o

f San

Fra

ncisc

o


No. 3


FY of Allocation Action: 2009/10 Current Request:

Project Name:


Signatures

Project Manager Grants Section Contact

Name (typed):

Title:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

(415) 701-4563

[email protected]


Mike Sallaberry

By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) sales tax revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation.

(415) 701-4343


$2,085,450

Margurite A. Fuller

Manager, Grants Procurement

(415) 701-4331

(415) 701-4734

[email protected]

Traffic Calming Program Mgr

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 8-Signatures Form v. 0809 Page 31 of 31

Address:

Signature:

Date:

1 S. Van Ness Avenue, 7th FL, San Francisco, CA 94103

1 S. Van Ness Avenue, 8th FL, San Francisco, CA 94103

Please sign in blue ink.

P:\Prop K\FY0910\ARF Final\MTA-DPT TC-Implementation F, 8-Signatures Form v. 0809 Page 31 of 31

No. 3

2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14

DPT Evaluation of New Requests Programmed $50,000 $55,000 $55,000 $60,000 $220,000

DPT Evaluation of New Requests Allocated $50,000 $50,000

DPT Traffic Calming Program Outreach Programmed $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $40,000

DPT Traffic Calming Program Outreach Allocated $20,000 $20,000

DPTFolsom St. Traffic Calming Plan (Support Planning Dept and DPW Paving) Allocated $58,000 $58,000

DPT TBD (2 plans at $61,000 each) Programmed $122,000 $122,000




DPT TBD Programmed $152,000 $152,000

DPT Visitacion Valley Area Traffic Calming Plan Programmed $145,000 $145,000

DPT Cayuga-San Jose Avenue-Traffic Calming Plan Programmed $90,000 $90,000

DPT Clayton Area Traffic Calming Plan Programmed $87,000 $87,000

DPT Dewey Blvd. Area Traffic Calming Plan Programmed $87,000 $87,000

Programming and Allocations To-date

2009 Prop K 5YPP - Program of ProjectsTraffic Calming - EP 38

Last Update: January 21, 2009

Agency Project Name StatusFiscal Year

Total

Project Evaluation And Outreach

New Project Studies / Plan Development (Arterial)

New Project Studies / Plan Development (Local - Areawide - Large)

New Project Studies / Plan Development (Local - Site Specific - Small Area Wide - Linear)

P:\Prop K\SP‐5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP‐ PENDING\38 Traffic Calmingx38 2009 5YPP ‐ Dec DRAFT 1 of 5

2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14





Total

DPT Jerrold Ave. Traffic Calming Plan Programmed $90,000 $90,000

DPTJordan Park-Laurel Heights Area Traffic Calming Plan Programmed $87,000 $87,000

DPTMinna - Natoma - 15th St. Area Traffic Calming Plan Allocated $85,000 $85,000

DPT South Silver Terrace Area Traffic Calming Plan Allocated $85,000 $85,000

DPT TBD (2 plans at $90,000 each) Programmed $180,000 $180,000DPT TBD (3 projects at $92,000 each) Programmed $276,000 $276,000DPT TBD (4 projects at $95,000 each) Programmed $380,000 $380,000

DPT Early Implementation/Spot Improvements Programmed $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000DPT FY 2009/10 Early Implementation1 Pending $56,100DPT Sunset Traffic Circle2 Pending $85,200 $85,200

DPTTBD - Joint opportunity project (e.g. coordination with DPW repaving) Programmed $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000

DPTBalboa - Denman Middle School (Safe Routes 2 School Match) Programmed $105,000 $105,000

DPTClarendon Alternative Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) Programmed $3,880 $3,880

DPTClarendon Alternative Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) Allocated $86,120 $86,120

DPTGuadalupe Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) Programmed $110,000 $110,000

DPT TBD (Safe Routes to School Match) Programmed $150,000 $150,000

DPTWest Portal Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) Programmed $110,000 $110,000

DPT18th Avenue Bypass Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $21,750 $21,750

DPT Bayview Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $38,400 $38,400

DPT Central Richmond Traffic Calming Implementation3 Pending $157,800 $157,800

DPT Cerritos-Cedro Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $12,800 $12,800

Implementation (Early Implementation / Action)

Implementation (Local - School Area)

Implementation


2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14





Total

DPT Circular Traffic Calming Implementation4 Pending $145,000 $145,000

DPT Excelsior Traffic Calming Implementation5 Pending $217,500 $217,500

DPTHolloway - Garfield Traffic Calming Implementation6 Pending $170,000 $170,000

DPT Inner Sunset Traffic Calming Implementation7 Programmed $0 $70,000 $70,000

DPTNorth Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation8 Pending $72,500 $72,500

DPT O’Shaughnessy Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $87,000 $87,000

DPT Potrero Hill Traffic Calming Implementation9 Pending $165,900 $165,900

DPT Randolph/Broad Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $20,000 $20,000

DPTSouth Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation10 Pending $145,000 $145,000

DPT Teresita Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $116,000 $116,000

DPT West Portal Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $14,500 $14,500

DPTRoosevelt - Buena Vista - 17th St. Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $161,000 $161,000

DPT Sunnyside Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $114,700 $114,700

DPT Crestlake Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $165,500 $165,500

DPT St. Francis Wood Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $73,800 $73,800

DPT Fillmore Traffic Calming Implementation Pending $45,000 $45,000


2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14





Total

DPTMission St. South of Cesar Chavez St. Traffic Calming Implementation Programmed $58,000 $58,000

DPT

TBD (Implementation of projects from the following traffic calming plans: Bayview, 18th Ave. Bypass, West Portal, Teresita Blvd., Bernal Heights, Central Richmond, Potrero Hill, Holloway-Garfield, Cedro-Cerritos, Roosevelt-Buena Vista-17th St, Sunnyside, Crestlake, St. Francis Wood, Fillmore, Mission South of Cesar Chavez St., Folsom St.., Minna-Natoma, South Silver Terrace) Programmed $1,980,000 $1,980,000

DPT

TBD (Implementation of projects from the following traffic calming plans: Bayview, Central Richmond, Potrero Hill, Holloway-Garfield, Cedro-Cerritos, Roosevelt-Buena Vista-17th St, Sunnyside, Crestlake, St. Francis Wood, Fillmore, Mission St. South of Cesar Chaves St., Folsom St., West Portal, Minna-Natoma, South Silver Terrace, Clayton, Dewey, Jordan Park-Laurel Heights, Visitation Valley) Programmed $1,450,000 $1,450,000

DPT

TBD (Implementation of projects from the following traffic calming plans: Central Richmond, Potrero Hill, Holloway-Garfield, Roosevelt-Buena Vista-17th St, Sunnyside, Crestlake, Mission South of Cesar Chavez St., Folsom St. West Portal, Minna-Natoma, South Silver Terrace, Clayton, Dewey, Jordan Park - Laurel Heights, Visitation Valley, Cayuga-San Jose Ave., Jerrold) Programmed $1,075,000 $1,075,000


2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14





Total

DPT

TBD (Implementation of projects from the following traffic calming plans: Central Richmond, Potrero Hill, Mission St. South of Cesar Chavez St., Folsom St. West Portal, Minna-Natoma, South Silver Terrace, Clayton, Dewey, Jordan Park - Laurel Heights, Visitation Valley, Cayuga-San Jose Ave., Jerrold) Programmed $1,499,880 $1,499,880

$2,631,450 $3,004,500 $2,302,000 $2,067,000 $2,429,880 $12,378,730$2,666,450 $3,004,500 $2,307,000 $2,177,000 $2,279,880 $12,434,830

$35,000 $35,000 $40,000 $150,000 $0 $56,100

FOOTNOTES:

1 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for Early Implementation/Spot Improvements decreased from $65,200 to $56,100. 2 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for Sunset Traffic Circle increased from $72,500 to $85,200. 3 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for Central Richmond Traffic Calming Implementation decreased from $160,000 to $157,800. 4 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for Circular Traffic Calming Implementation increased from $135,000 to $145,000.

5YPP Amendment to accommodate adjusted FY 2009/10 cost estimates and project priorities (Res.xx-xx, xx.xx.xxxx)

Total Programmed in 5YPP

Programming for this category was adjusted to match the 2009 Prop K Strategic Plan, which was provisionally approved by the Authority Board on July 28, 2009 (R10-07).Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity

Total Programmed in 2009 Strategic Plan

9 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for Potrero Hill Traffic Calming Implementation increased from $160,000 to $165,900. 10 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for South Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation increased from $135,000 to $145,000.

5 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for Excelsior Traffic Calming Implementation increased from $202,500 to $217,000. 6 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for Holloway - Garfield Traffic Calming Implementation increased from $160,000 to $170,000. 7 Programming for Inner Sunset Traffic Calming Implementation ($70,000) moved from Fiscal Year 2009/10 to Fiscal Year 2010/11. 8 Fiscal Year 2009/10 programming for North Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation increased from $67,500 to $72,500.
