Upload
dodung
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Multi-disciplinary studies for understanding the Seamounts in the Levantine Basin – Eastern
Mediterranean
Dr. V. Lykousis Research Director
Institute of Oceanography-HCMR
Mud volcanoes hydrates and methane seepage in
the Levantine basin
outline -Mud volcanoes? -Significance -Gas Hydrates -Anaximandrer Mts -Florence Rise and Eratosthenes SM -Conclusions/further work
Mud volcanoes (MV) The term mud volcanoes or mud domes are used to refer to morphological formations similar to earth volcanoes created by geo-excreted liquids and gases like fluid mud, hydrocarbons (methane) and various rock clasts originated from deep sources. Highly compressed deep sediment strata is the cause of upward migration of the geofluids through raptures or major fault zones. Usually are associated with subduction zones and mega (thick) sediment sliding.
Olympi FIELD
Cita et al.,1996; Robertson et al.,1998
DeLange & Brumsack, 1998 Dahlmann & DeLange, 2003
Napoli MV
CRETE
SSW NNE
Significance of MV Mud volcanoes are often associated with petroleum deposits and the active ones are the seabed witnesses for the presence of deep hydrocarbon resources Mud volcanoes are “oasis” of symbiotic benthic communities providing the primary energy/food (carbon) source from the hydrocarbons (chemosynthesis) Mud volcanoes are associated with the creation of hydrocarbon clathrate/gas hydrate deposits.
Isorropodon perplexum 2-14 mm
Myrtea amorpha 8-20 mm
Idas modiolaeformis 2-17 mm
Typical benthic communities of mud volcanoes
Lucinoma kazani 15 -40 mm
Thyasira striata 2-9 mm
3 см
В
CH4.6H2O
Methane hydrate structure
Gas hydrates or hydrates
Sea bed
Sea water
Sub-bottom Sediments + CH4 +GH
Fluid mud+CH4 +H2O Relatively high To
CH4 free gas
Upward free gas dispersion and
Cooling
Г 1 см
1 m3 Gas hydrate=164m3 CH4 Future Energy Source
Contribution to the Global Change
Contribution to slope instabilities-hazards
CH4 Fluidized hydrates
CH4 gas Temperature
increase
Το μέλλον της θαλάσσιας ερευνας στην Ελλάδα, Ιδρυμα Ευγενίδου 14-15 Νοεμβρίου 2011
Morpho-bathymetric map of the Mediterranean
CIESM and IFREMER
Anaximander Mts
Florence rise
Eratosthenes SM
May, 2003
November, 2004
ANAXIMANDER EU Project
Gas hydrate sites (sampled) Gas hydrate sites (inferred)
ANAXIMANDER
R/V AEGAIO 2003,2004
Bathymetric/Backscatter image. High backscatter (ORANGE) probably from mud breccia with methane gas indicating MUD
VOLCANISM
Amsterdam
Kazan
Kula
Athina
Thessaloniki ~1200m
Amsterdam Mud Volcano
Central crater
Shaded relief and backscatter image. Dark blue indicates high backscatter (fluid mud with methane gas
and rock clasts from deep sources)
2 km
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 50 100 150 200CH4 [nM]
dept
h [d
bar]
03 CT 1
05 CT 1
08 CT 1
020
406080
100
120140
0 2500 5000
CH4 [µmol/l wet sed]
dept
h [c
mbs
f]
AN 05 BC5-1
AN 05 GC3
AMSTERDAM MV
Water column
Subbottom sediments
Methane plume
Methane hydrates
SEA BED
G.de Lange team, Un. of
Utrecht
GH AN05BC3 AN05GC3
2004
1 Box core
13 Gravity cores
5 MAK
4 APCA
3 Gravity cores
10 Box cores
2003 AMSTERDAM MUD VOLCANO
GH AX02GC2 AX06GC1 AX09GC1 AX10GC1 AX11GC1 AX15GC1
Sampling sites
Slow depressuarisation –collection of released methane from GH- actual methane
concentration/volume sediment (Vmeth/Vsed)
High in-situ pressure
Hydrocarbon (methane gas) potential of the Anaximander MVs
(Lykousis et al., 2009)
Rough estimations of the total volume of methane gas in the Anaximander MVs are about 6.40 km3 (6.40 109 m3 of methane gas), - if the base of GH/BSR at 200 m (Praeg et al., 2007) - and assuming uniform density of GH with burial depth
In 2005 (scale 1/2000 000)
Florence rise
Eratosthenes SM
Florence rise
Woodside et al., 2002
Anaximander Mts
TEXEL MV
Woodside et al., 2002
DSDP drilling
Activity of Texel MV? GH??
J.Mascle Fluid seepages from
backscatter images of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea
ERATOSTHENES SM
J.Mascle Fluid seepages from
backscatter images of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea
NAUTILUS Expeditions 2008?, 2011, 2012
NAUTILUS Expedition (www.nautiluslive.org)
NAUTILUS Expedition (www.nautiluslive.org)
CONCLUSIONS / FURTHER WORK
-Detailed investigations on the Florence rise MVs and methane seeps of the Eratosthenes SM (multibeam, ROV observations and sampling, seabed coring, water column sampling etc), Benthic biodiversity-benthic habitat mapping of the Eratosthenes SM
-extension of methane seepage on Eratosthenes SM? activity of MVs (methane plumes?), GH on Florence rise?, complicate geology (“columnar” limestones?) etc
Thank you