Multi Business Company

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    1/20

    Managing the MultibusinessCorporation

    Structure of the Multidivisional Company

    o Theory of the M-formo The divisionalized firm in practice

    The Role of Corporate Management

    Managing the Corporate Portfolio

    o Portfolio planning techniques

    o Value-creation through corporaterestructuring

    Managing Individual Businesses

    Managing Internal Linkages

    Recent Trends

    OUTLINE

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    2/20

    The Multidivisional Structure: Theory of the M-Form

    Effic iency advantages o f the mult id iv is ional f i rm:

    Recognizes bou nded rat ional itytop management has limiteddecision-making capacity

    Divides decision-making according to frequency:

    high-frequency operating decisions at divisional level

    low-frequency strategic decisions at corporate level

    Reduces costs of communication and coordination: businesslevel decisions confined to divisional level (reduces decisionmaking at the top)

    Global, rather than local optimization:- functional organizations

    encourage functional goals. M-form structure encourages focuson profitability.

    Efficient allocation of resources through internal capital and labormarkets

    Resolves agency problem-- corporate management an interfacebetween shareholders and business-level managers.

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    3/20

    The Divisionalized Firm in Practice

    Cons traints upon decentralizat ion.

    Difficult to achieve clear division of decision making betweencorporate and divisional levels.

    On-going dialogue and conflict between corporate and divisional

    managers over both strategic and operational issues. Standardizat ion of divis ional management

    Despite potential for divisions to develop distinctive strategies andstructurescorporate systems may impose uniformity.

    Managing divis ional inter-relat ions hips

    Requires more complex structures, e.g. matrix structures wherefunctional and/or geographical structure is imposed on top of aproduct/market structure.

    Added complexity undermines the efficiency advantages of the M-form

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    4/20

    The Functions of Corporate Management

    Decisions over diversification, acquisition,divestment

    Resource allocation between businesses.

    Business strategy formulation

    Monitoring and controlling businessperformance

    Sharing and transferring resources andcapabilities

    Managinglinkagesbetween

    businesses

    Managing theindividual

    businesses

    Managing theCorporatePortfolio

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    5/20

    The Development of Strategic Planning Techniques:General Electric in the 1970s

    Late 1960s: GE encounters problems of direction,coordination, control, and profitability

    Corporate planning responses:

    Portfo l io Plannin g Modelsmatrix-based frameworksfor evaluating business unit performance, formulatingbusiness strategies, and allocating resources

    Strategic Bus iness UnitsGE reorganized around

    SBUs (business comprising a strategically-distinctgroup of closely-related products

    PIMSa database which quantifies the impact ofstrategy on performance. Used to appraise SBUperformance and guide business strategy formulation

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    6/20

    Portfolio Planning Models: TheirUses in Strategy Formulation

    Al locat ing resou rces-- the analysis indicates both theinvestment requirements of different businesses and theirlikely returns

    Formulat ing business -unit strategy-- the analysis yieldssimple strategy recommendations (e.g..: build, hold, or

    harvest)

    Sett ing performance targets-- the analysis indicates likelyperformance outcomes in terms of cash flow and ROI

    Portfo l ios balance-- the analysis can assist in corporategoals such as a balanced cash flow and balance of growingand declining businesses.

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    7/20

    Low

    Medium

    High

    Low Medium HighIndus

    tryA

    ttrac

    tiveness

    Portfolio Planning Models:The GE/ McKinsey Matrix

    Ind us try Attract iveness Cri ter ia Bu siness Unit Posit ion

    - Market size - Market share (domestic,- Market growth global, and relative)- Industry profitability - Competitive position

    - Inflation recovery - Relative profitability- Overseas sales ratio

    Bu siness Uni t Posi t ion

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    8/20

    HIGHLOW

    Annualrealrateofmarketg

    rowth(%)

    Relative market share

    Earnings: high stable

    Cash flow: high stable

    Strategy: milk

    Earnings: low, unstable

    Cash flow: neutral or negative

    Strategy: divest

    Earnings: high stable, growing

    Cash flow: neutral

    Strategy: invest for growth

    Earnings: low, unstable, growing

    Cash flow: negative

    Strategy: analyze to determine

    whether business can

    be grown into a

    star, orwill degenerate

    into a dog

    HIGH

    ?

    Portfolio Planning Models: The BCGGrowth-Share Matrix

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    9/20

    Annualrealrateofmarketgrowth(%)

    Relative market share

    -8

    -4

    0

    4

    8

    12

    Bakery division

    Position in 2003 Position in 2000. (Area of circle proportional to $ sales)

    Applying the BCG Matrix to Time Warner Inc.

    AOL

    Filmproduction

    Cable

    Cable TVNetworks

    Music

    MagazinePublishing

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    10/20

    Do Portfolio Planning Models Help or Hinder

    Corporate Strategy Formulation?

    ADVANTAGES

    Simplicity: Can be quicklyprepaired

    Big picture: Permits one pagerepresentation of the corporateportfolio & the strategicpositioning of each business

    Analytically versatile:Applicable to businesses,products, countries,distribution channels.

    Can be augmented: A usefulpoint of departure for moresophisticated analysis

    DISADVANTAGES

    Simplicity: Oversimplifies thefactors determining industry

    attractiveness and competitiveadvantage Ambiguous:The positioningof a business dependscritically upon how a market isdefined

    Ignores synergy: the analysistakes no account of anyinterdependencies betweenbusinesses

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    11/20

    Corporate Restructuring to Create

    Value: The McKinsey PentagonCurrent

    market

    value

    Maximum raider

    opportunity

    Current perceptions

    gap

    Company

    value as is

    Opt imal

    restructured

    value

    Strategic and

    operating

    opportunities

    Potential value

    with in ternal

    improvements

    Disposal/acquisition

    opportunities

    Total company

    opportunities

    1

    2 5RESTRUCTURING

    FRAMEWORK

    3 4Potential value

    with external

    improvements

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    12/20

    Exxons Strategic Planning Process

    EconomicReview

    Energy Review

    BusinessPlans

    Discuss--ion withcontact

    director

    Approvalby

    Mgmt.

    Committee

    StewardshipReview

    StewardshipBasis

    FinancialForecast

    CorporatePlan

    InvestmentReappraisals

    AnnualBudget

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    13/20

    Corporate Control over the Businesses

    2 basic approaches

    Input

    control

    Monitoring & approvingbusiness level decisions

    Output (or performance)

    control

    Setting & monitoringthe achievement of

    performance targets

    Primarily through strategicplanning system & capital

    expenditure approval

    system

    Primarily through performancemanagement system,

    including operating budgets

    and HR appraisals

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    14/20

    Goold & Campbells Corporate Management

    Styles: Financial and Strategic Control

    High

    Low

    CONTROL INFLUENCE

    Strategicplanning

    Centralized

    Strategiccontrol

    Holdingcompan

    y

    Financialcontrol

    Flexible strategic Tight strategic Tight financial

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    15/20

    Corporate Management

    Applications of PIMS Analysis

    Sett ing performance targetsfeeding business unit strategic and industry data into the PIMS

    regression model gives performance norms for the business(PAR ROI).

    Formulating b usiness uni t s trategy PIMS model can simulate the impact of changing strategic

    variables.

    Al locat ing investment funds between businesses PIMS Strategic Attract iveness Scancomparison different

    business unitsstrategic attract ivenessand their cash flowcharacteristics

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    16/20

    Managing Linkages between Businesses

    KEY ISSUEHow does the corpo rate center add value to th e business?

    BASIS OF BUSINESS LINKAGESSharing of resources and capabilities.

    SHARING OCCURS AT TWO LEVELS:

    Corporate levelcommon corporate services Business levelsharing resources, transferring capabilities

    PORTERS ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS LINKAGES AND CORPORATESTRATEGY TYPES Port fo l io management Parent creates value by operating an internalcapital market

    Restructur ingParent create value by acquiring and restructuringInefficiently-managed businesses

    Transferr ing sk i l lsParent creates value by transferring capabilitiesbetween businesses

    Shar ing act iv i t iesParent creates value by sharing resources betweenbusinesses

    ROLE OF DOMINANT LOGICimportance of corporate managersperception of linkages

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    17/20

    What Corporate Management Activities are Implied byPorters Concepts of Corporate Strategy

    (1) Port fo l io Management

    Using superior information and analysis to acquire attractive companies at

    favorable prices (e.g. Berkshire Hathaway).

    Minimizing cost of capital (e.g. GE)

    Create efficientt internal system for capital allocation (e.g. Exxon-Mobil) Efficient monitoring of business unit performance (e.g BP-Amoco).

    (2) Restructur ing: Intervening to cut costs and divest under performing assets (e.g.

    Hanson during 1980s & early 1990s)

    (3) Transferr ing ski l ls:

    Transferring best practices (e.g. Hewlett-Packard)

    Transferring innovations (e.g. Sharp)

    Transferring key personnel between businesses (e.g. Sony)

    (4) Sharing activi t ies:

    Common corporate services (e.g. 3M)

    Sharing operational resources and functions (e.g. sales and distribution,

    manufacturing facilities).

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    18/20

    Rethinking the Management of Multibusiness

    Corporations: Lessons from General Electric

    Delayering --- from 9 or 10 layers of hierarchy to 4 or 5

    Decentralizing decisions.Reformulating strategic planningfrom formal, document-intensiveanalysis to direct face-to-face discussion of key issues.

    Redefining the role of HQfrom checker, inqu isi tor, and author i tytofaci l i tator, helper, and suppor ter.

    Coordinating role of HQ corporate HQ to lead in creating theboundaryless corporation where innovations and ideas flow and where

    horizontal coordination occurs to respond to new opportunities.

    HQ as change agent corporate HQ driving force for continualorganizational change (e.g. workout, six-sigma).

    Jack Welchs transformation of GEs structure and management systems:

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    19/20

    Rethinking the Management of MultibusinessCorporations: Lessons from ABB

    Matrix organizationboth product and country / regionalcoordination; flexible reporting requirements

    Radical decentralizationABBs corporate HQ was tiny (

  • 7/28/2019 Multi Business Company

    20/20

    Rethinking the Management of MultibusinessCorporations: Bartlett & Ghoshals Analysis

    of Key Management Processes

    Managing the tensionbetween short-term

    ambition

    Managing operationalinterdependencies and

    personal networks

    Creating and pursuingopportunities

    Creating and maintainingorganizational trust

    Linking skills, knowledge,and resources

    Reviewing, developing, andsupporting initiatives

    Shaping and embeddingcorporate purpose

    Developing and

    nurturing organizationalvalues

    Establishingstrategic mission &performance standards

    Front- l ine Management Middle Management Top Management

    RENEWAL PROCESS