Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MultidimensionalMultidimensional SAR SAR ImagingImaging::StudiesStudies in the in the FrameworkFramework
of LIMES Projectof LIMES ProjectM. Costantini1, G. Fornaro2, F. Lombardini3, M. Pardini3, F. Serafino2, F. Soldovieri2
1 Telespazio S.p.A.Via Tiburtina, 965 - I-00156 Roma (Italy)
2 IREA-CNRVia Diocleziano,328 I-80124 Napoli (Italy)
3 Dip. di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Università di PisaVia G. Caruso, 16 - I-56122 Pisa (Italy)
FRINGE 2007 Workshop - European Space Agency
Overview
The LIMES projectMotivation3D tomographic imaging, ERS results4D differential tomography, ERS resultsPerformance evaluation, satellite clustersConclusions
In the framework of LIMES project, SAR 3D/4D Tomography is experimented for supporting Critical Infrastructure SurveillanceCritical regasification plants and pipelines in Spain considered as test areas
Development of satellite-based services providing relevant information and decision-support tools in relation to:
Critical infrastructure monitoringOrganization and distribution of humanitarian relief & reconstructionSurveillance of the EU borders (land and sea)Surveillance and protection of maritime transport for sensitive cargoProtection against emerging security threats
Among the main users involved in the project there are Civil Protection organizations, FRONTEX, EU and International Agencies
LIMESLand and Sea Integrated Monitoring for European Security
Sixth Framework Program GMES Security
Motivation
3D SAR 3D SAR TomographyTomography Multibaseline dataSeparation in elevation of scattering contribution within a single pixelFull 3D Imaging
4D SAR 4D SAR ImagingImaging((differentialdifferential tomographytomography))
Multibaseline multitemporal data Joint elevation-velocity reconstruction
[Pasquali-Prati-Rocca et al., IGARSS ’95] [Reigber-Moreira, IEEE-TGARS ’00]
[Lombardini, IEEE-TGARS ’05]
Surface penetrationSteep ground topography (layover)High spatial density of strong scatterers
Superposition of responses frommultiple scatterers in the same pixel
• accurate determination of scatterer locations• precise tracking of their movement
• SAR interferometry • Multibaseline InSAR• SAR differential interferometry• Multitemporal interferogram stacking• Persistent scatterers
•
Need for more sophisticated techniques
3D Imaging: SAR Tomography
flight d
irectio
n Data acquired at the nth antenna (pass):
SN
Sn
S0
xs
r
z
g0
gn
gN
Need for data calibration (removal of atmospheric variations, scene deformations, …)
Backscatteringprofile
elevation
n-th orthogonalbaseline
After collecting all data, the problem is the inversion of a simple semi-discrete linear operator:
Beamforming SVDAdaptive beam.MUSIC……
The inversion can be affordedwith different algorithms
(linear, regularized, adaptive, parametric, …)
SPATIAL COMPLEX AMPLITUDE SPECTRUMSPATIAL COMPLEX AMPLITUDE SPECTRUM[ Note: equivalent to the classical imaging concept ]
3D: Real data experimentsSan Paolo stadium, Naples
ERS-1/2 data, 63 imagesBaseline span: 1700 m, height resolution 5.5 m Temporal span: ∼ 10 years
range
Singular Value Decomposition(single look)
SVD(5 azimuth looks)
height
azimuth azimuth
Adaptive beamforming(5 azimuth looks)
SAR image
4D: Differential Tomography
flight d
irectio
n
SNB-1,NT-1
Sn,m
S0,0
x s
r
z
rn,m (s)
v
NB : number of tracks per passNT : number of passes
Multistatic system: data acquired at the nth
track and the mth pass:
Elevation-velocitybackscattering
profile
n-th orthogonalbaseline
m-th pass
SNB-1,0
S0,NT-1 g0,0
gn,m
gNB-1,NT-1
gNB-1,0
g0,NT-1
SPATIOSPATIO--TEMPORAL COMPLEX AMPLITUDE SPECTRUMTEMPORAL COMPLEX AMPLITUDE SPECTRUM
After collecting all data, we have again:
2D Beamforming2D SVD2D Adaptive beamforming……
4D: Experimental results (1)
amplitude
Theoretical point-spread function
2D Beamforming
Velocity (mm/yr)
2D Adaptive beamforming
Velocity (mm/yr)
“Mergellina”, NaplesSingle scattering mechanism30 tracksBaseline span: 1066 m, height resolution 8.8 mTime span: ∼ 6 years
-10 -5 0 5 10
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Doppler (mm/year)
Ele
vatio
n (m
)
2D Capon TOMO-DOPPLER
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Velocity (mm/yr)
Elev
atio
n(m
)
2D Capon2D Adaptive beamforming
Scatterers well resolved in heightEstimation of deformation velocity consistent with independent measuresReduced SLL w.r.t. 2D Fourier beamforming, but higher sensitivity to miscalibration residualsNo equal velocity constraints (equal velocity case: [Ferretti-Bianchi-Prati-Rocca, EURASIP JASP ’05])
San Paolo stadium, NaplesDouble scattering mechanism
2D Adaptive beam., multilook(9 looks)
-10 -5 0 5 10
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Doppler (mm/year)
Ele
vatio
n (m
)
2D Beam. TOMO-DOPPLER
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Velocity (mm/yr)
Elev
atio
n(m
)
2D Beamforming
-3.1 mm/yr
∼ 10 m
4D: Experimental results (2)
“Vomero”, NaplesERS-1/2, 58 passes, ∼10 years temporal span
- Single scatterers - - Double scatterers -
Scattering mechanisms can be separatedAutomatic single/double scatterer identification also tested
SVD single look
4D: Experimental results (3)
San Paolo Stadium, Naples
- Single scatterers - - Double scatterers -
SVD single look
4D: Experimental results (4)
Imaging Capabilities and Satellite Clusters (1)Typical poor and irregular
baseline/time samplingHigh sidelobes in the 3D/4D High sidelobes in the 3D/4D
reconstructedreconstructed profileprofile
Double speckled compact scatterersSNR = 15, 12 dB32 looks
Elevation ElevationVelocity Velocity
2D Beamforming 2D Adaptivebeamforming
Single track per pass
Elevation ElevationVelocity Velocity
2D Beamforming 2D Adaptivebeamforming
3 tracks per pass
Imaging Capabilities and Satellite Clusters (2)
Acquisition grid (baseline/time) Singular value (SV) distribution
Larger SV dynamic
2 antennas per pass
58 passes, orth. baseline separation 150 m
Accuracy Bounds EvaluationAlgorithm performance judgementCharacterization of precision limits
ToolsTools fromfrom informationinformation theorytheory::
3D Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB)[Gini-Lombardini-Montanari, IEEE-Tr. on AES ’02]
3D Hybrid CRLB (HCRLB)takes into account possible miscalibration residuals[Pardini-Lombardini-Gini, IEEE-TSP, accepted for publication]
Given a statistical model for the data vector g, bounds can be
evaluated for the 4D estimation of scatterer scatterer elevationselevations and line of line of
sightsight velocitiesvelocitiesERS-1/2, 58 passes10 looksDouble speckled scatterers, large critical baseline(b⊥ TOT /bC = 0.05, classical triangular-shaped spatial decorrelation)Possible temporal decorrelation, τc = 2 months (exponential decorrelation model)[Lombardini-Griffiths, IEE Meeting on RS Sign. Proc. ’98][Rocca-De Zan-Monti Guarnieri-Tebaldini, ENVISAT Symp. ’07]
CRLB Sample Curves
Single track per pass
4D: height
Double scatterer distance in height: 2 resolution unitsRelative motion: 0.7 mm/yr
4D: l.o.s. velocity
[Fully ideal]
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 3010
-2
10-1
100
101
Signal-to-Noise ratio (dB)
Ver
tical
hei
ght s
tand
ard
devi
atio
n (m
)
4D - CRLB on height estimation - No temporal decorrelation
1 antenna2 antennas
4D: height
NO temporaldecorrelationNO ATMOSPHERE
2 antennas per passBaseline separation: 150 m
Limited advantage in the heightprecision limit, but gain in the SLL
High gain expected in real cases withmiscalibration residuals (atmosphere)HCRLB for 4D: work in progress
ConclusionsIn this work, we have summarize the achievements of 3D/4D SAR imagingwith satellite long-term data.The presented results demonstrate that urban scatterers can be separatedin the elevation/velocity domain by multi-dimensional imaging.By means of numerical tests and analytical bounds we have investigatedthe potentialities of SAR tomography with satellite clusters.
Future systems (e.g. COSMO-Skymed) or cooperative satellite formations (CartWheel, Pendulum, e.g. Tandem-X, ASI Sabrina) are expected in the future
to collect high resolution data with lower temporal separation, or simultaneously.
Thus, the accuracy and performance are expected to increase.