Upload
nguyendien
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
MULTIFERROICS AND
MAGNETOELECTRICS:
MODELLING AND UNDERSTANDING
Sponsored as a Starting Grant 2007 by the European Research Council - Eu FP7 IDEAS
Project “BISMUTH”:
Breaking Inversion-Symmetry in Magnets: Understand via THeory
Dr. Silvia PicozziConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche,
CNR-SPIN, UOS L’Aquila67100 L’Aquila, Italy
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
FERROELECTRICITY: BASICS
“Order-disorder” vs “displacive”
•Ferroelectrics: polar materials, in which a spontaneous electric
polarization can be switched via an external electric field (P: primary
order parameter in the phase transition)
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
PROPER DISPLACIVE FERROELECTRICITY
•BaTiO3:
Up or down
displacement
of B-site cationPup
Pdw
Ba Ti
O
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
PROPER DISPLACIVE FERROELECTRICITY
•BaTiO3:
Up or down
displacement
of B-site cationPup
Pdw
Ba Ti
O
PE
FE
Hybridization:
Ti d (empty) -
O p states
“covalency-
driven”
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
PROTON TRANFER: EFFICIENT SOURCE OF P
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
MAGNETOELECTRICS MULTIFERROICS
Magnetoelectrics: Control
of P (M) via a magnetic
(electric) field
Magnetization vs
magnetic field in
FMs
M
H
Polarization vs
electric field in
FEs
P
E
Polarization vs
magnetic field in
MEs
P
H
M
E
Magnetization vs
electric field in
MEs
Ferroic: P, M or are spontaneously formed to produce
ferroelectricity, ferromagnetism or
ferroelasticity
Multiferroic: coexistence of at least
two kinds of long-range ordering
(MULTI-) FERROICS:
SYMMETRY PROPERTIES
W. Eerenstein, N. D. Mathur and J. F. Scott, N ature 442, 759 (2006)
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
CRITERIA FOR MAGNETISM AND FERROELECTRICITY
•Uncompensated spins form magnetic moments
• Exchange interaction results from virtual hopping of
electrons between ions
In order to stabilize ferro- or ferri- or antiferro-
magnetism one needs partially filled d-shells!
•Ferroelectricity requires “d0-ness”
•Ferromagnetism (or FiM- or AFM)
requires partially filled d-electrons
WAY OUT:
Put FE-active ion on A-site
Put magnetic ion on B-site
CHEMICAL
INCOMPATIBILITY!QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
The holy grail: BiFeO3
IMPROPER
FERROELECTRICITY IN MAGNETS
What do we mean by “improper ferroelectricity”?
Concepts:
how to break inversion symmetry
via spin- or charge-ordering
Materials and mechanisms
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
BREAKING INVERSION SYMMETRY IN MAGNETS
FERROELECTRICITY no Inversion Symmetry
Spin-order (some AFM
or “spiral”) Charge-order
•“Proper”
• Ionic displac. break
inversion symmetry (IS)
• “Covalency”-driven
Co
nv
en
tio
na
l
•“Improper”
• Electron degrees of freedom break IS
• “Correlation”-driven
No
n-C
on
ve
ntio
na
l
Orbital-order
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
Left handed
Left handed Right handed
HOW MAGNETIC ORDERING CAN BREAK INV. SYM.?
Spinspiral
TN
Ortho-TbMnO3
T.Kimura et al., Nature 425, 55 (03); S.W.Cheong and M.Mostovoy, Nature Mater. 6, 13 (07)
q
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
DZYALOSHINSKII-MORIYA VS HEISENBERG
p r ij x (S1 x S2)
p = (S1· S2)
Vector coupling: Requires non-collinear spins
Scalar coupling: Works with collinear spins
Superexchange striction
FM
AFM < FM
p
p’
?
Direct exchange striction
d’ > d
d
p
p’
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
DZYALOSHINSKII-MORIYA VS HEISENBERG
p r ij x (S1 x S2)
p = (S1· S2)
Vector coupling: Requires non-collinear spins
Scalar coupling: Works with collinear spins
Superexchange striction
FM
AFM < FM
p
p’
?
Through center of symmetry:
cancellation ==>> P = 0 !
Absence of inversion center:
P finite!
p
p
p’
p
1)
2)
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
E-TYPE
MANGANITES:
ELECTRONIC
AND IONIC
FERROELECTRICITY
•In collaboration with:
K. Yamauchi (CNR-INFM)I. A. Sergienko, E. Dagotto
(Oak Ridge Natl. Lab, Univ. Tennessee, TN)
Mn↑Mn↓O
Op
OapTw
o d
iffe
ren
t O
P
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
ORTHO-HoMnO3 AS A MAGNETICALLY
DRIVEN FERROELECTRIC
E1 E2
•First ab-initio calculation
of P driven by AFM*
• P is ~few C/cm2 (highest among magnetic
improper ferroelectrics)
• FE switching path via
spin-rotations
• Dual nature of P in real compounds:
ionic displacements and
electronic/magnetic
effects are both important
* S. Picozzi, K. Yamauchi, B. Sanyal,
I. Sergienko, E. Dagotto, PRL 99,
227201 (2007)
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
“Pure” charge-ordering
HOW CHARGE ORDERING CAN BREAK INV. SYM.?
Neutral chain
+ - + +- -
Inversion center: no P
Inversion center: no P
Site
centered
CO
Bond
centered
CO
Structural dimerization
Inversion center: no P
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
Structural dimerization“Pure” charge-ordering
+ - + +- -
+ + +- - -
Combination
Intermediate
Bond- and site-
centered
CO
Absence of
inversion
center:
it can be polar !!
Neutral chain Inversion center: no P
HOW CHARGE ORDERING CAN BREAK INV. SYM.?
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
CLASSIFICATION OF
IMPROPER MULTIFERROICS
Improper
Multiferroics
Spin-ordering
driven
“DM”-driven
(spin-orbit related)
“Heisenberg”-driven
(mostly collinear)
Charge-ordering
driven
TbMnO3
RMn2O5
(R=Tb,Dy,Ho)
LiCu2O2, LiCuVO4
LuFe2O4
Fe3O4
La0.5Ca0.5MnO3
RNiO3 (R = Pr, …, Lu)
RMnO3
(R=Ho,..,Lu)
Ca3CoMnO6
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
Crystalline hybrid materials like
Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs)
attractive materials for gas storage,
drug delivery, catalysis, ….
Pls attend talk
by Dr. Alessan-
dro Stroppa
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
MICROSCOPIC ORIGIN OF ME EFFECT
p r ij x (S1 x S2)
i) Inverse
Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya
Vectorial coupling:
e.g. spin spiral in TbMnO3
pi J12 (S1· S2)ii) Heisenberg-type exchange
striction
Scalar coupling:
e.g. AFM-E HoMnO3
i) and ii) Inter-site
spin interaction
iii) Spin-dependent p-d hybridizatione.g. CuFeO2
T. Arima, JPSJ 76, 073702 (2007).
e
p (S · e)2eSingle-site
spin-orbit coupling
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
MAGNETOELECTRICITY IN Ba2CoGe2O7
H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, S. Miyahara, N. Furukawa
and Y. Tokura, PRL105, 137202(2010).
Antiferromagnetism, TN=6.7K
= 24°
sin(2)
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
H-dependence of P
MAGNETOELECTRICITY IN Ba2CoGe2O7
H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, S. Miyahara, N. Furukawa
and Y. Tokura, PRL105, 137202(2010).
= 24°
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
CALCULATED ME EFFECT IN
Ba2CoGe2O7
Co1
(0, 0, 0)
Co(1/2, 1/2, 0)
a
b
Ba
Ge
O
P
Energy (meV/Co) (μB) (μC/m2)
MAE S 100 S 110
Co2+: eg2 t2g
3 eg2 t2g
0 small MAE
Spins in ab plane: OK with expts
Induced P by keeping AFM config and rotating spins
(under SOC)
Pc µsin2f
Pc sin (2) :
OK with expts
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
CALCULATED ME EFFECT IN
Ba2CoGe2O7
Co1
(0, 0, 0)
Co(1/2, 1/2, 0)
a
b
Ba
Ge
O
Expts:
Pcmax =
120μC/m2
cant AFM spinsM//110
H110
'
P
Induced P by canting spins w.r.t [1-10] AFM config
0 30 60 90
Spin-canting angle f’ (°)
-20
-10
0
10
20
Pc
(mC
/m2)
0 5 10 15H(T)
-20
-10
0
10
20
Pc (
mC
/m2)
F110
A1-10
H110
NB: Assume = M/H110
= 0.25 B/Co (expt)
Silvia Picozzi Congresso SIF - L’AQUILA Sept 29th 2011
(LOCAL) MICROSCOPIC ORIGIN OF P: SOC
non-bonding occupied state
yz-zx /√2
P
asymmetric-bonding non-occupied states
xy
z
x2-y2
x2-y2: -0.05
3z2-r2: -0.4
yz, zx: +0.9
xy: +1.2
EF
E (eV)
1
2
3
yz+zx /√2
P
0
SOC mixing
DFT-obtained Co d-orbital occupation
(% for spin sum) under enhanced SOC
θ spin polar angle, Φ spin azimuth angle
Most occupied orbital to the spin
Maximum P when Co spin parallel to upper or lower Oxygen bonds