Upload
lethuy
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Music of the MicrospheresEigenvalue problems from micro-gyro design
David Bindel
Department of Computer ScienceCornell University
Tufts/Schlumberger, 15 Oct 2013
Tufts/Schlumberger 1 / 43
G. H. Bryan (18641928)
Tufts/Schlumberger 2 / 43
G. H. Bryan (18641928)
Elected a Fellow of the Royal Society (1895)Best known for Stability in Aviation (1911)Also did important work in thermodynamics and hydrodynamics
Tufts/Schlumberger 3 / 43
G. H. Bryan (18641928)
Bryan was a friendly, kindly, very eccentric individual...
(Obituary Notices of the Fellows of the Royal Society)
... if he sometimes seemed a colossal buffoon, he himself didnot help matters by proclaiming that he did his best workunder the influence of alcohol.
(Williams, J.G., The University College of North Wales, 18841927)
Tufts/Schlumberger 4 / 43
Bryans Experiment
On the beats in the vibrations of a revolving cylinder or bellby G. H. Bryan, 1890
Tufts/Schlumberger 5 / 43
Bryans Experiment Today
Tufts/Schlumberger 6 / 43
The Beat Goes On
0.00 6.48 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.60 3.70 3.80 3.90 4.00 4.10 4.20 4.30 4.40 4.50 4.60 4.70 4.80 4.90 5.00 5.10 5.20 5.30 5.40 5.50 5.60 5.70 5.80 5.90 6.00 6.10 6.20 6.30 6.40
Audio Track
0.00 8.36 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.60 3.70 3.80 3.90 4.00 4.10 4.20 4.30 4.40 4.50 4.60 4.70 4.80 4.90 5.00 5.10 5.20 5.30 5.40 5.50 5.60 5.70 5.80 5.90 6.00 6.10 6.20 6.30 6.40 6.50 6.60 6.70 6.80 6.90 7.00 7.10 7.20 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60 7.70 7.80 7.90 8.00 8.10 8.20
Audio Track
Tufts/Schlumberger 7 / 43
The Beat Goes On
99.4
99.6
99.8
100
100.2
100.4
100.6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Free vibrations in a rotating frame (simplified):
q + 2Jq + 20q = 0, J [0 11 0
]Eigenvalue problem:
(2I + 2iJ + 20
)q = 0.
Solutions: 0 . = beating !
Tufts/Schlumberger 8 / 43
A Small Application
Northrup-Grummond HRG(developed c. 1965early 1990s)
Tufts/Schlumberger 9 / 43
A Smaller Application (Cornell)
Tufts/Schlumberger 10 / 43
A Smaller Application (UMich, GA Tech, Irvine)
Tufts/Schlumberger 11 / 43
A Smaller Application!
Tufts/Schlumberger 12 / 43
Micro-HRG / GOBLiT / OMG
Goal: Cheap, small (1mm) HRGCollaborator roles:
Basic designFabricationMeasurement
Our part:Detailed physicsFast softwareSensitivityDesign optimization
Tufts/Schlumberger 13 / 43
Foucault in Solid State
Tufts/Schlumberger 14 / 43
Rate Integrating Mode
Tufts/Schlumberger 15 / 43
Rate Integrating Mode
Tufts/Schlumberger 16 / 43
A General Picture
=q1(t) +q2(t)
q2
q1
q2
q1
q + 2Jq + 20q = 0, J [0 11 0
]
Tufts/Schlumberger 17 / 43
A General Picture
=q1(t) +q2(t)
q2
q1
q2
q1
[q1(t)q2(t)
][cos(t) sin(t)sin(t) cos(t)
] [q01(t)q02(t)
].
Tufts/Schlumberger 18 / 43
An Uncritical FEA Approach
Why not do the obvious?Build 3D model with commercial FERun modal analysis
Tufts/Schlumberger 19 / 43
The Perturbation Picture
Perturbations split degenerate modes:Coriolis forces (good)Imperfect fab (bad, but physical)Discretization error (non-physical)
Tufts/Schlumberger 20 / 43
Three Step Program
1 Perfect geometry, no rotation2 Perfect geometry, rotation3 Imperfect geometry
Tufts/Schlumberger 21 / 43
Step I: Perfect Geometry, No Rotation
Tufts/Schlumberger 22 / 43
Step I: Perfect Geometry, No Rotation
Free vibration problem in weak form
w, b(w, u) + a(w,u) = 0.
Symmetry: Q any rotation or reflection
b(Qw, Qu) = b(w,u)
a(Qw, Qu) = a(w,u)
Decompose by invariant subspaces of Q = Fourier analysis!
Tufts/Schlumberger 23 / 43
Fourier Expansion and Axisymmetric Shapes
Decompose into symmetric uc and antisymmetric us in y:
uc =
m=0
cm()ucm(r, z), u
s =
m=0
sm()usm(r, z)
where
cm() = diag ( cos(m), sin(m), cos(m))
sm() = diag ( sin(m), cos(m), sin(m)) .
Modes involve only one azimuthal number m; degenerate for m > 1.
Preserve structure in FE: shape functions Nj(r, z)c,sm ()
Tufts/Schlumberger 24 / 43
Block Diagonal Structure
Finite element system: Muh + Kuh = 0
K =
Kcc0Kss1
Kcc1Kss2
Kcc2. . .
KssMKccM
Mass has same structure.
Tufts/Schlumberger 25 / 43
Step II: Perfect Geometry, Rotation
Free vibration problem in weak form
w, b(w,a) + a(w,u) = 0.
wherea = u + 2 u + ( x) + x
Discretize by finite elements as before:
Muh + Cuh + Kuh = 0
where C comes from Coriolis term (2b(w, u)).
Tufts/Schlumberger 26 / 43
Block Structure of Finite Element Matrix
Discretize 2b(w, u):
C =
C00 C01C10 C11 C12
C21 C22 C23. . . . . . . . .
Off-diagonal blocks come from cross-axis sensitivity:
= zez + r =
00z
+cos()x sin()ysin()x + cos()y
0
.Neglect cross-axis effects (O(2/20), like centrifugal effect).
Tufts/Schlumberger 27 / 43
Analysis in Ideal Case
Only need to mesh a 2D cross-section!Compute an operating mode uc for the non-rotating geometry.Compute associated modal mass and stiffness m and k.Compute g = b(uc, ez us).Model: motion is approximately q1uc + q2us, and
mq + 2gJq + kq = 0,
Tufts/Schlumberger 28 / 43
Step III: Imperfect Geometry
Tufts/Schlumberger 29 / 43
What Imperfections?
Let me count the ways...Over/under etchMask misalignmentThickness variationsAnisotropy of etching single-crystal Si
These are not arbitrary!
Tufts/Schlumberger 30 / 43
Representing the Perturbation
Map axisymmetric B0 real B:
R B0 7 r = R + (R) B.
Write weak form in B0 geometry:
b(w,a) =
B0w a J dB0,
a(w,u) =
B0(w) : C : (u) J dB0,
where J = det(I + F) with F = /R.
Tufts/Schlumberger 31 / 43
Decomposing
Do Fourier decomposition of , too! Consider case where
m = only azimuthal number of wn = only azimuthal number of up = only azimuthal number of
Then we have selection rules
a(w,u) =
{O(k), |m n| = kp0, otherwise
Similar picture for b.
Tufts/Schlumberger 32 / 43
Decomposing
Over/under etch (p = 0)Mask misalignment (p = 1)Thickness variations (p = 1)Anisotropy of etching single-crystal Si (p = 4)
Tufts/Schlumberger 33 / 43
Block matrix structure
Ex: p = 2
K =
K0 2 3
K1 2
K2 2
K3 2 K4
2 K53 2 K6
. . .
Tufts/Schlumberger 34 / 43
Impact of Selection Rules
Fast FEA: Can neglect some wave numbers / blocksAlso qualitative information
Tufts/Schlumberger 35 / 43
Qualitative Information
Operating wave number m, perturbation number p:
p = 2m frequencies split by O()kp = 2m frequencies split at most O(2)p 6 |2m frequencies change at O(2), no splitp = 1
p = 2m 1 O() cross-axis coupling.
Note:m = 2 affected at first order by p = 0 and p = 4(and O(2) split from p = 1 and p = 2).m = 3 affected at first order by p = 0 and p = 6(and O(2) split from p = 1 and p = 3).
Tufts/Schlumberger 36 / 43
Mode Split for Rings: (r, ) = (cos(2m), 0).
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22
2
0
2
Perturbation amplitude / thickness
Freq
uenc
ysh
ift(%
)
Tufts/Schlumberger 37 / 43
Mode Split for Rings: (r, ) = (cos(m), 0).
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22
1
0.5
0
Perturbation amplitude / thickness
Freq
uenc
ysh
ift(%
)
m = 2a m = 2bm = 3a m = 3bm = 4a m = 4b
Tufts/Schlumberger 38 / 43
Analyzing Imperfect Rings
Tufts/Schlumberger 39 / 43
Analyzing Imperfect Rings
q2
q1
q2
q1
q2
q1
q2
q1
q2
q1
q2
q1
Tufts/Schlumberger 40 / 43
Beyond Rings: AxFEM
Mapped finite / spectral element formulationLow-order polynomials through thicknessHigh-order polynomials along lengthTrig polynomials in Agrees with results reported in literatureComputes sensitivity to geometry, material parameters, etc.
Tufts/Schlumberger 41 / 43
Further Steps
Lots of possible directions:Symmetry breaking through damping?Integration with fabrication simulation?Joint optimization of geometry and fabrication?
Tufts/Schlumberger 42 / 43
Thank You
Yilmaz and BindelEffects of Imperfections on Solid-Wave Gyroscope DynamicsProceedings of IEEE Sensors 2013, Nov 36.
Thanks to DARPA MRIG + Sunil Bhave and Laura Fegely.
Tufts/Schlumberger 43 / 43