The Henderson Repository is a free resource of the HonorSociety of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International. It isdedicated to the dissemination of nursing research, research-related, and evidence-based nursing materials. Take credit for allyour work, not just books and journal articles. To learn more,visit www.nursingrepository.org

Item type Presentation

Format Text-based Document

Title Using the Glasgow Coma Scale in Non-NeurologicalClinical Areas

Authors Thornley, Tracey; Rullis, Lauren

Downloaded 16-May-2018 21:45:33

Link to item http://hdl.handle.net/10755/243333

My interest Honours research study Purpose

The cornerstone of neurological assessment (Ellis & Cavanagh, 1992)

Designed with simplicity in mind for a wide range of clinical environments and by staff with no special training (Teasdale & Jennet, 1974)

Used by the majority of neurological units both Australia & Internationally

Assumed to be reliable and a reproducible measure of neurological function (Gill, Reiley & Green, 2004)

Variation in practice Between neuroscience units and other areas

(Waterhouse, 2005)

Two hours longer to detect change in non neurological areas (Rowley & Feilding, 1990; Crewe & Lye, 1990)

Inconsistencies in application

Little known about pattern of errors made by nurses (Ellis & Cavanagh, 1992)

Few nurses appreciate the mechanism underpinning assessment (Waterhouse, 2005)

Patient deterioration not identified early enough (Waterhouse, 2008)

Problems with assessment

Discrepancy & uncertainty in areas such as painful stimulus: how to apply & which type (Waterhouse, 2009)

Lack of standard criteria universally (Fischer & Mathieson, 2001)

Inter-reliability was not high (Waterhouse, 2008)

Differences noted in the way doctors and nurses perform GCS (Holdgate, Ching &Angonese, 2006)

Nurses from NICU had higher accuracy levels (Heron,

Davie, Gilles & Courtney, 2001)

Mixed Methodology

2 Phases

Questionnaire

Semi structured Interviews

Participants

Registered Nurses

Lack of training Confusion associated with purpose of GCS Lack of understanding what constituted the

GCS No standardisation in practice Difficulty in communication and documenting

results Difficulty interpreting results which led to

confusion in areas of application

“I Didn’t use it at all last year…I don’t think I have seen the form’’

“I don’t even know on our ward where I would find

it” “it wasn’t even something I would think of

using…in retrospect of course you should. Its just if you don’t see it for that length of time you just don’t think about using it”

“I would probably have more difficulty doing what

would be assessing subtle differences in their condition”

“I really struggle with it” “Often most days I will start the shift and go

‘how the hell did they get a 15 or how the hell did they get a six’

“I’m a bit confused with the scoring too because of things like the reflexes and things”

“I still struggle with it. I keep asking because I am not convinced.. I find whenever I start my shift mine can be quite different to theirs”

“I don’t feel confident in doing it definitely not”

“I heard my educator going through something’s with the new grads today and I was like I didn’t know this…I was like this is kind of scary. The educator said to me ‘you have missed out on a lot being chucked in the deep end’ it has forced me to ask other nurses things but I don’t know”

“Some say it’s right some say it’s not, so I don’t know”

“I would start with the peripheral and then move to central. I am not sure I haven’t been taught anything”

“when some of these things are routine that are standard people just go put down the same thing without thinking… that is what we are use to writing and I am just thinking it might be the same with the GCS that people are not really doing the assessments there not really putting any thought into it”. .. I am pretty sure most of them would do a good one at least at the start of their shift because you want to know if your patient is going to deteriorate… it depends on the patient but I do think it happens definitely “

“if it is not there on paper kind of thing. You might be doing your own little assessment…but you’re not doing the specific ticking and crossing it kind of gets missed”

“when I think back to when I was on the ward doing it but I think I was more unconsciously doing it…Like if you are really busy on the ward and they have started to get confused but they kind of go in and out of it, it could be a big deal but your just busy. I remember being really busy on the ward and you kind of miss it and then you forget to hand it over and then the next person the same thing like it can escalate. Giving it a number like the GCS could be quite helpful”

“The thing that we don’t do is go and do it together and kind of align to get over that subjectivity” When this did not occur, participants felt very unsure of their assessment results and said “I got no one to compare it with its so isolated” and another

“When you have had three days off and you come on an this patient has been there for four days but you just don’t happen not to get them.. So its quite a good one I think to say with handover and definitely every shift”

Skill development failure impacts on an individuals confidence and thus creates enduring confusion

May be related to minimal education and training a lack of reinforcement minimal repetition during the early years of practice

This affects confidence with using the GCS to assess patients confused with their assessment reinforces not using the GCS This appears to be a cyclical process

Review training (University & Hospital) Implementation of training and education

guidelines Simple guidelines attached to GCS to aid in

assessment Assessment as mandatory introduction to

hospital Evaluation

Forms the basis for future clinical decisions Important to early identification the

deteriorating patient

Garling report (2008) where there was a priority on the detection of the deteriorating patient

Consistency in nursing assessment Ultimately key to improving patient outcome

Addison, C., & Crawford, B. (1999). Not bad, just misunderstood. Nursing Times, 95(43), 52-53. Baker, M. (2008). Reviewing the application of the Glasgow Coma Scale: Does it have interrater

reliability? British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 4(7), 342-347. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo

Park, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Bjork, I.T. (1995). Neglected conflicts in the discipline of nursing: perceptions of the importance

and value of practical skill. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(1), 6-12. Bjork, I.T. (1997). Changing conceptions of practical skill and skill acquisition in nursing education.

Nursing Inquiry, 4(3), 184-195. Bjork, I.T. (1999). Practical skill development in new nurses. Nursing Inquiry. 6(1), 34-47. Bowker, N.I. (2001). Understanding online communities through multiple methodologies combined

under a postmodern research endeavor. Forum Qualitative Social Research(Sozialforschung), 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm

Brannen, J. (2005). Mixed methods research: a discussion paper. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/89/

Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed

Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.

Bryman, A. (2007). The research question in social research: what is its role? The International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(1), 5-20.

Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Dallas: Houghton Miffin.

Cornford, I.R. (1993). Theories of skill development and research into the development of expertise: some implications for competency based training. Conference Papers, After Competence: The future of Post Compulsory Education and Training Conference, 1-3(1) Brisbane: Centre for Skill Formation, Research and Development, Griffith University.

Cornford, I., & Athanasou, J. (1995). Developing expertise through training. Industrial and Commercial Training, 27(2), 10-18.

Creswell, J.W., & Clark, P.L.V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed method research. Thousand Oaks, California; London: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J.W. (1994) Research design: qualitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Crewe, H., & Lye, R. (1990). Nurses’ knowledge of coma assessment using the Glasgow Coma Scale. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 8(2), 94-99.

Crimlisk, J.T., & Grande, M.M. (2004). Neurologic assessment skills for the acute medical surgical nurse. Orthopaedic Nursing, 23(1), 3-9.

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process, St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Dawson, R., Von Fintel, N., & Nairn, S. (2010). Sedation assessment using the Ramsay Scale. Emergency Nurse, 18(3), 18-20.

Denzin, N.K. (1970). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Denzin, N.K. (Ed.) (1978). Sociological methods: a sourcebook. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ellis, A., & Cavanagh, S.J.( 1992). Aspects of neurological assessment using the Glasgow Coma

Scale. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 8(2), 94-99. Fielding, K., & Rowley, G. (1990). Reliability of assessment by skilled observers using the Glasgow

Coma Scale. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 7(4), 13-17. Fischer, J., & Mathieson, C. (2001). The history of the Glasgow coma scale: implications for

practice. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 23(4), 52-58. Fitts, P.M. (1964). Perceptual skill learning. Categories of Skill Learning. New York: Academic Press. Fitts, P.M. (1986). Factors in complex training. In G. Kuhlen (Ed.), Studies in educational psychology.

Waltham, Massachusetts: Blaisdell Publishing Company. Friel, J.P. (Ed.). (1900). Dorland’s illustrated medical dictionary (26th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders. Garbett, R., & McCormack, B. (2000). Concept analysis: practice development. London: RCN

Institute, London. Garling, P. (2008). Final report of the special commission of inquiry: Acute care services in public

hospitals—Overview. Retrieved from http://www.nswnurses.asn.au/documents/16524/DocumentName/E_Overview.pdf

Giddings, L.S. (2006). Mixed methods research. Positivism dressed in drag? Journal of research in nursing. 11(3), 195-203.

Giddings, L.S., & Grant, B. (2008). A Trojan horse for positivism? A critique of mixed methods research. Advances in Nursing Science, 30(1), 52-60.

Gill, M.R., Reiley, D.G., & Green, S.M. (2004). Interrater reliability of Glasgow coma scale scores in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 43(2), 215-223.

Glason., J, Chang, E., Chenoweth, L., Hancock, K., Hall, T., & Hill-Murray, F., et al. (2006). Evaluation of a model of nursing care for older patients using participatory action research in an acute medical ward. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(5), 588-598.

Glasson, J.B., Chang, E.M.L., & Bidewell, J.W. (2008). The value of participatory action research in clinical nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 14(1), 34-39.

Grbich, C. (1999). Qualitative research in health: an introduction. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Green, J., Caracelli, V.J., & Graham, W.F. (1989). Towards a conceptual framework for mixed- method evaluation designs. Education, Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.

Habermas, J. (1972). In shapiro JJ. Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann. Heron, R., Davie, A., Gilles, R., & Courtney, M. ( 2001). Interrater reliability of the Glasgow coma

scale scoring among nurses in sub-specialties of critical care. Australian Critical Care, 14(3), 100-105.

Holdgate,A., Ching, N., & Angonese, L. (2006). Variability in agreement between physicians and nurses when measuring the Glasgow coma scale in the emergency department limits its clinical usefulness. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 18(4), 379-384.

Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing quantitative and qualitative methods: triangulation in action. Administration Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611

Johnstone, P.L. (2004). Mixed methods, mixed methodology health services research in practice. Qualitative Health Research, 14(2), 259-71.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

Kolb, D.A., & Fry, R. (1975). Towards an applied theory of experiential learning in C. Cooper (ed.) Theories of Group Process. London: John Wiley.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lipscomb, M. (2008). Mixed method nursing studies: a critical realist critique. Nursing Philosophy, 9(1), 32-45.

Lowry, M. (1999). The Glasgow coma scale in clinical practice: a critique. Nursing Times, 95 (22), 40-42.

Mallet, J., Cathmoir, D., Hughes, P., & Whitby, E. (1997). Forging new roles. Nursing Times, 93(18), 38-39.

Manley, K.(2001). Consultant nurse: concept, processes, outcome. (Doctoral Dissertation). London: Manchester University/RCN Institute.

Manley, K., & McCormack, B. (2003). Practice development: purpose, methodology, facilitation and evaluation. Nursing Critical Care, 8(1), 22-29.

Mason, J., (2006). Six strategies for mixing methods and linking data in social research. ESRC National Centre for research methods NCRM working paper series, 4(6), 1-12.

McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2006). A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Research In Nursing, 11(1), 66-78.

McGill., (2001). The Canadian Stroke Network. Retrieved from www.medicine.mcgill.ca/stokeengine.assess/definitions_enhtml

Miller, W.L., & Crabtree, B.F. (1994). Clinical Research in Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S (eds.). Handbook and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 340-352.

Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Morgan-Ellis, J., Alexander, V.D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding J., Sleney,J., & Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and Integration: processes, claims and implications. Qualitative research, 6(1), 45-59.

Morse, J.M. (1991). Designing funding qualitative research in Denzin, N.K., Lincolin, Y.S (eds) Handbook and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 220-235.

Morse,J.M. & Feild,P.A. (1996). Nursing Research: The application of qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.

Nagy, S., Mills, J., Waters, D., & Birks, M. (2010) Using research in healthcare practice. Sydney: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

NSW Health. (2007). Between the flags, keeping patients safe: Clinical excellence commission. Retrieved from http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/programs/between-the-flags.html

Patton, M.Q. (1981) Practical evaluation. Beverly Hills, California: Sage. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks,

California: Sage. Polgar, S. & Thomas, S.A. (2008). Introduction to research in the health sciences

(5th ed.). New York: Elsevier. Quinn, F.M. (1995). The principles and Practices of Nurse Education (3rd ed.).

London: Chapman & Hall. Quinn, F.M. (1980). The Principles and Practice of Nurse Education (1st ed.).

London: Chapman & Hall. Rattray, J., & Jones, M. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and

development. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 16(2), 234-243. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data

collection and Analysis Techniques in Mixed Method Studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(3), 246-255.

Segatore, M., & Way, C. (1992). The Glasgow coma scale: time for change. Neurologic assessment, 21(6), 548-556.

Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), 345-352.

Shah, S. (1999). Neurological assessment. Nursing Standard, 13(22), 49-56.

Shoqirat, N. (2006). Nursing students understanding of the Glasgow coma scale. Nursing Standard, 20(30), 41-47.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C., (Eds.) (2010). Sage handbook of Mixed methods in social research & behavioral research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Taylor, B., Kermode, S., & Roberts, K. (2007). Research in nursing and health care: Evidence for practice (3rd ed.). Victoria, Australia: Thomson.

Teasdale, G., & Jennet, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. The Lancet, 2(7872), 81-84.

The Brain Trauma Foundation (2000). The American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the joint section on neurotrauma and critical care: Glasgow coma scale score. Journal of Neurotrauma, 17(6-7), 563-571.

Upton, D., & Upton, P. (2006). Development of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54(4), 454-458.

Wadsworth, Y. (1997). Every day evlautaion on the run (2nd ed). Melbourne, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

Walsh, M. (1997). Watson’s clinical nursing and related sciences (5th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth & Heinemann.

Waterhouse, C. (2005). The Glasgow coma scale and other neurological observations. Nursing standard, 19(33), 56-64.

Waterhouse, C. (2008). An audit of nurses’ conduct and recording observations using the Glasgow coma scale. British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 4(10), 492-499.

Waterhouse, C. (2009). The use of painful stimulus in relation to Glasgow coma scale observations. British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 5(5), 209-214.

Watson, D. (2006). The impact of accurate patient assessment on quality patient care. Nursing Times, 102(6), 34-37.