Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
My Teaching Por/olio
Gundeti Sreeram Reddy
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Vidya Jyothi Institute of Technology Hyderabad
Contents
! Introduc7on ! Teaching Philosophy ! Course Design ! Ac7ve learning methods ! Collabora7ve learning Ac7vity ! Technology incorporated ! Course Assessment ! Conclusions
Introduc7on About me Name : Gunde7 Sreeram Reddy Designa7on : Professor & Head of the Department Department : Mechanical Engineering Qualifica7ons: ! B.E(Mechanical) from Osmania University , Hyderabad
! M.Tech(Energy systems) from JNT University, Hyderabad
! Pursuing Ph.D from JNT University , Hyderabad
! Experience in this field : 16 years
My Teaching Philosophy
! To prepare students to solve problems related to technical systems that will be useful to the industry
! My teaching methods draw from my own experience in teaching and mentoring students.
! I maintain good rela7onships and rapport with my students. ! I hold an open-‐door policy in which students are able to come to consult me in my room any day and any 7me.
! I aVended and aVending many workshops to make myself ready for future challenges in engineering educa7on.
Experimental Course
Course Title : Finite Element Methods (FEM) Class : Third year second semester Program : Mechanical Engineering (Undergraduate Program) Prerequisite: Matrices , MOS and Heat Transfer.
Course Design
First day of class
Course descrip7on document
Office hours
Macro level course planning
Lesson plan (Micro level)
Ac7vity based learning
Think-‐Pair-‐share
In class Teams
Ac7vity based learning
Ac7vity Name: Think-‐Pair-‐Share (TPS) Year : First Year Mechanical Course : Engineering Drawing prac7ce. Topic : Projec7on of Straight lines
Reflec,ons Earlier I used to solve this problems using tradi7onal way of teaching i.e. where I used solve the problems and students used to note it down in their notes ,but a^er implemen7ng this ac7ve learning ac7vity(think-‐pair-‐share) not only I found my students enjoyed it ,I too came to know how much my students understood about this topic. I will be implemen7ng this ac7vity regularly.
Feed back on TPS
76
14 10
YES can not say NO
Chart Title Series1
Feed back on student opinion about aVainment of ac7vity outcome
Ac7vity based learning
Ac7vity Name: In class Teams Year : Third year Second semester Mechanical Course : Finite element method. Topic : Numerical Integra7on
Reflec,ons I found this ac7vity is helpful when we are solving mathema7cal problems, where numbers are important. Students compare their results with other teams and they diagnose themselves where they went wrong. It worked well in my class
Feed back on In class Teams
Feed back on student opinion about aVainment of ac7vity outcome
54.3
36.4
10.3
yes can not say NO
Chart Title Series1
Collabora7ve learning
Ac7vity Name: Student Team Achievements Division (STAD) Year : Third year Second semester Mechanical Course : Finite element method. Class strength : 59 Ac7vity done in 2 periods @ 50 mins Students present on the day of the ac7vity: 50
Problem statement : Given assignment (4 Problems)
Poten,al challenges How I could overcome
Most of the students show resistance to new things
Mo7vated the students about the ac7vity and its outcomes
Time Management Reminded them about it for every 20 mins
Maintaining discipline Acted as a facilitator (moving around)
Involving all the students in group Problems are chosen in such a way that students can solve part of the problem independently
Absenteeism Mo7vate.Mo7vate.Mo7vate.Mo7vate
Collabora7ve learning
Poten,al challenges
Feedback is taken from both the streams students on 5 parameters ! Satisfaction level with the tutor ! Time of the activity used effectively
! Confidence to perform external exam ! Did you enjoy attending the activity ! Do you recommend methodology to your juniors
Collabora7ve learning
Feed back parameters
Collabora7ve learning
0 1
12
27
10
1-‐2 3-‐4 5-‐6 7-‐8 9-‐10
Sa7sfac7on level with the tutor Series2
0 0
8
27
15
1-‐2 3-‐4 5-‐6 7-‐8 9-‐10
Time of the ac,vity used effec7vely
Series2
1 2
14
25
8
1-‐2 3-‐4 5-‐6 7-‐8 9-‐10
Confidence to perform external exam
Series2
0 0
14
22
14
1-‐2 3-‐4 5-‐6 7-‐8 9-‐10
Did you enjoy aVending the ac,vity
Series2
Feed back analysis
Collabora7ve learning Feed back analysis
1 2
6
29
12
1-‐2 3-‐4 5-‐6 7-‐8 9-‐10
Do you recommend this methodology to your juniors
Series2
Technology Incorpora7on
Simula7ons from Autodesk Inventor
Google classroom
Group messenger (Informal)
Technology Incorpora7on
simula,ons
Technology Incorpora7on
Google classroom
Assessment Mid exam Ques7on Paper
0 points 1 points 2-3 points 4 points 5 points Student left the problem blank, or simply gave answer correct or not, without showing appropriate work.
Student attempted the problem and did not finish it. Student failed to use correct method, or did not follow the instructions given in the problem.
Students attempted the problem and did not finish it. student used the correct method, however did not take the problem to completion.
The students work is for the most part correct .There may be an arithmetic error, or a problem with the format of the answer. Work is clear and easy to follow.
Students showed all required work to arrive at correct solution. Work is clear and easy to follow.
Rubrics
Assessment -‐ feed back
Faculty opinion on its implementa7on
75
15 10
YES CAN NOT SAY NO
Chart Title Series1
Conclusions
Learned to conduct some of the ac7ve learning methods
Importance of teaching philosophy statement
Office hours concept
Using technology
Importance of Assessment
Reason to change
Ques7ons
Thank you
