Click here to load reader
Upload
hellas
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
REVIEW
n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation: effects on infant and maternaloutcomes
Rachele De Giuseppe • Carla Roggi •
Hellas Cena
Received: 22 May 2013 / Accepted: 15 January 2014
� Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Abstract
Background Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-
PUFA), particularly docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and
arachidonic acid, are, respectively, n-3 and n-6 family
members and play an important role in fetal and infant
growth and development. Pregnancy and lactation impose
special nutritional needs for the mother-fetus situation.
Since the LC-PUFA required by the fetus is supplied by
preferential placental transfer of preformed LC-PUFA
rather than their precursor, it has been hypothesized that
additional maternal supply of LC-PUFA, especially DHA,
during pregnancy may improve maternal and infant
outcomes.
Aim To summarize evidences of the effect of n-3 LC-
PUFA intake during pregnancy and lactation on maternal
and infant outcomes in order to offer a comprehensive view
of this issue that should be useful for clinical practice.
Results Maternal n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation may
reduce risk for early preterm birth [34 weeks and seems
very promising for primary allergy prevention during
childhood. On the contrary, there are not sufficient data
proving that the consumption of oils rich in n-3 LC-PUFA
during pregnancy optimizes child’s visual and neurode-
velopment and reduces the risk for preeclampsia and
perinatal depression; the implications of these findings
remain to be elucidated.
Conclusion The implications of n-3 LC-PUFA supple-
mentation on fetal development, maternal outcomes and
later infant growth is worth being elucidated and is
promising in its potential for a positive impact on fetal and
maternal outcomes.
Keywords Pregnancy � Docosahexaenoic acid �a-Linolenic acid � Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids
Introduction
Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA), par-
ticularly Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) and Ara-
chidonic Acid (AA, 20:4n-6), are important constituents of
the phospholipids of all cell membranes, where they play
roles assuring the correct environment for membrane protein
function, maintaining membrane fluidity, regulating cell
signaling, gene expression and cellular function, and serving
as substrates for the synthesis of lipid mediators [1].
DHA may be obtained directly from dietary fish oils or
from the precursor a-linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3n-3); the
usual precursor of AA is dietary linoleic acid (LA, 18:2n-6)
from plant sources.
Because humans don’t possess desaturase enzymes
capable of inserting either the n-3 or the n-6 double
bounds, AA and LA are considered essential and can be
derived only from the diet [2].
Over the past decades, evidences from observational
studies and randomised trials have suggested that the intake
of LC-PUFA throughout pregnancy, particularly DHA,
plays potential benefits on maternal and fetal/neonatal
health [3].
R. De Giuseppe (&)
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Chirurgiche e
Odontoiatriche, U.O. Ematologia e CTMO, Fondazione IRCCS
Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Universita degli
Studi di Milano, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
C. Roggi � H. Cena
Unit of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Department of Public
Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of
Pavia, Via Bassi 21, 27100 Pavia, Italy
123
Eur J Nutr
DOI 10.1007/s00394-014-0660-9
Since the ability of the fetus and the human placenta to
desaturate and elongate fatty acids is limited, a preferential
materno-fetal transfer of LCPUFA via specific fatty acid
transport system, including multiple placental transport
proteins (FATP) [4], has been suggested.
Numerous studies have reported that LC-PUFA per-
centages in the lipids of cord plasma are higher than in
maternal plasma at birth time [5].
In vitro and in vivo experiments show that the placenta
is capable of transporting LC-PUFA preferably to the fetal
site, with the following preference order: DHA [ AA [ALA [ LA [6].
Therefore, since preferential placental transfer of pre-
formed LC-PUFA rather than the precursor ALA and LA
supplies the LC-PUFA required by the fetus, it has been
hypothesized that additional maternal supply of DHA
during pregnancy may improve maternal and infant
outcomes.
The aim of this article was to summarize evidence of n-3
LC-PUFA intake during pregnancy on children’s cognitive
and visual development, gestational length, preeclampsia,
postpartum depression and childhood’s allergic diseases.
Visual and cognitive development
About 60 % of the dry weight of brain tissue is fat; DHA
and AA are the most abundant LC-PUFA in the brain and
are critical for proper brain, nervous system and eye
development [7]. Because considerable amounts of fatty
acids accumulate in the fetal renal cortex tissue and retinal
membrane synapses during the third trimester of pregnancy
and during the first postpartum month [8, 9], data from
large cohort studies as well as from randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) indicated that an adequate amount of n-3 LC-
PUFA is important for the neonate to support long-term
cognitive and visual development [10].
However, even if results from in vivo studies [11] and
from many observational ones in humans suggested a
benefit of n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation, data from RCTs
of LC-PUFA administration in pregnancy and lactation are
not consistent in showing a benefit in infant retinal and
neurocognitive development [8].
We reported the two most recently systematic review
and meta-analysis of RCTs which evaluated the poten-
tial effects of n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation on infant
neurobehavioral and visual development during preg-
nancy [12] as well as during both pregnancy and lac-
tation [9].
Lo and colleagues [12] identified 9 RCTs of n-3 LC-
PUFA supplementation (DHA and EPA supplied, varied
among trials) focused on retinal development and neuro-
development with a starting point of intervention which
ranged from the 15th to the 25th week gestational age.
Data presented in this systematic review were conflict-
ing. In fact, as for visual acuity, the authors identified only
a small longitudinal, double-blinded RCT of 30 non-
smoking women supplemented with either DHA-fortified
cereal bars (n = 16) or placebo bars (n = 14), in which
there was a significant improvement in visual acuity
(assessed by Teller Acuity Cards Procedures) in DHA-
supplemented group at 4 months, but not at 6 month
postnatal [13]. Another randomized double-blind and pla-
cebo-controlled study, included in this systematic review,
reported that although DHA maternal supplementation
didn’t correlate with DHA infant status and had no effect
on retinal development, infants in the highest quartile for
cord blood DHA had significantly higher retinal sensitivity
when compared with infants in the lowest quartile [14].
Because the small number of trials, short-term follow-up
and assessments used, further research is needed to clarify
the effect of n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation on visual
development.
With regard to the neurodevelopment, the neurocogni-
tive studies included in this systematic review [12] reported
variable results in terms of whether LC-PUFA supple-
mentation during pregnancy could lead to benefits or not in
neurocognitive outcomes. Among 6 RCTs on the effect of
maternal LC-PUFA supplementation on neurocognitive
development in infants, 3 studies on mothers supplemented
daily with 10 mL cod liver oil or 10 mL corn oil placebo,
from 18 gestational weeks until 3 months after delivery,
have been reported [15–17]. In these trials, the neurode-
velopment measurement was assessed at ages day 2, at 3, 6,
9 months [15], as well as at 4 [16] and 7 years [17] of age;
differences were found only at 4 years old when children
of cod-oil-supplemented mothers had a higher score on the
mental processing composite of Kaufman Assessment
battery for Children, compared to children of placebo
group mothers [16].
Another RCT reported that significantly higher problem-
solving scores (i.e., better performance), assessed by the
infant planning test (IPT), were found in children of
mothers supplemented with DHA-rich cereal bars when
compared to placebo bars group [18].
A further double-blind and placebo-controlled study
described that a supplementation of fish oil (3.7 n-3 LC-
PUFA g/day) during pregnancy from 20 weeks till delivery
improved significantly the scores on the eye and hand
coordination of the Griffiths Mental Development Scales in
infants at age 2.5–3 years old [19].
Despite favorable effect of some studies reported in this
systematic review, considering the results of these 6 studies
on neurocognitive development, there is no evidence which
describes a correlation between the LC-PUFA supple-
mentation during pregnancy and the improvement in child
neurodevelopment. The authors reported that a possible
Eur J Nutr
123
explanation for these conflicting results may be due to the
presence of several other confounding factors (such as
nutrients, drugs, social stimulation and diseases) or to the
use of sufficiently sensitive or not standardized (such as
IPT) cognitive tests [12].
The 9 RCTs included in the systematic review by Lo
and colleagues [12] were also reported in the most recent
and first comprehensive systematic review and meta-ana-
lysis of RCTs published by Gould et al. [9] which sum-
marized 23 published and unpublished double-blind
randomized trials of n-3 PUFA supplementation during
pregnancy as well as during both pregnancy and lactation
on neurologic and visual development of the offspring.
The authors evaluated the development standard score
(DSS) in infants, toddlers and preschoolers and the intel-
ligence quotient (IQ) in children; secondly, they evaluated
other aspects of neurodevelopment (such as language,
behavior and motor development) and visual development.
Authors reported that differences between the treatment
and control groups for cognition were observed only in
preschool children 2–5 years who had a 3.92 point increase
in DSS when compared to the control group. Also sec-
ondary neurodevelopment aspects, such as motor and lan-
guage, didn’t differ between treated and placebo group
after supplementation during pregnancy as well as during
both pregnancy and lactation [9].
Because visual outcomes were evaluated with a variety
of assessment at different ages, they were not combined in
a meta-analysis; no difference was found between infants
in the treatment group when compared to the placebo group
on retinal sensitivity at 1 week and visual acuity at any
ages.
In summary, despite the encouraging data from in vivo
and observational studies, results reported by Lo et al. [12]
and by Gould et al. [9] do not support or refute the
hypothesis that n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation in preg-
nancy or in pregnancy and lactation improve child visual
and cognitive outcomes.
Many of the trials reviewed had methodological prob-
lems such as small sample sizes, inadequate blinded par-
ticipants and assessors, inadequate follow-up, inadequate
random sequence generation and inadequate compliance.
Therefore, in order to improve the basis of evidence-based
guidelines for pregnant women, future high-quality RCTs
will need large samples and appropriately specialized
assessments.
Gestational length
Preterm infants are recognized as being at risk of LC-
PUFA dietary insufficiency because they are born before
the last trimester is completed, prematurely ending the
supply of LC-PUFA across the placenta [20].
The maternal n-3 LC-PUFA intake during pregnancy
has been proposed as a mechanism to delay the onset of
spontaneous labor because DHA seems to be in part
responsible for the E2 and F2 prostaglandins inhibition
involved in the ripening of the cervix. DHA also appears to
relax uterine smooth muscles via increased production
PGI2 and PGI3 levels, thereby slowing contractions in the
last weeks of pregnancy [21].
Some observational studies, mainly in women living in
communities with high fish consumption, have suggested
that greater marine n-3 LC-PUFA intake during pregnancy
promotes longer gestation and higher birth weight [22, 23].
Several systematic reviews and meta-analysis of RCTs
reported that n-3 LC-PUFAs’ treatment was associated
with significantly longer gestational period, as compared to
no treated control group.
For example, Szajewska et al. [2] reported that n-3
supplementation LC-PUFA during pregnancy may increase
the duration of gestational period by an average of 1.6 day.
A Cochrane review (6 RCTs and 2,783 women) [24]
revising such findings revealed a mean 2.6 days longer
gestation in the marine-oil-supplemented group compared
with the no supplemented group.
Salvig and Lamont [25] reported that the mean gesta-
tional age at delivery was significantly higher by 4.5 days
in the supplemented n-3 LC-PUFA group when compared
to placebo.
The effect of n-3 LC-PUFA on the rate of preterm birth
is controversial and is still debated.
Szajewska et al. [2] didn’t find significant difference
between supplemented and non-supplemented women at
low-risk pregnancies in the percentage of preterm deliv-
eries (\37 week gestation) as not even Makrides et al. [24]
in a Cochrane review in the relative risk of birth before 37
completed weeks (5 RCTs, involving 1,916 women);
however, women allocated to marine oil supplementation
showed a lower risk of giving birth before 34 completed
weeks’ gestation compared with placebo (2 RCTs,
involving 860 women).
Similar findings were reported in a subsequent meta-
analysis about the effects of LC-PUFA supplementation on
women in high-risk pregnancies [26] demonstrating no
association of maternal fatty acid intake with risk of pre-
term birth \37 weeks of gestation (3 RCTs involving 523
participants); however, when the effects of supplementa-
tion were examined on the rate of early preterm birth
(\34 weeks of gestation), the relative risk was found to be
reduced in the supplemented group (2 RCTs involving 291
participants).
Finally, a recent meta-analysis [25] that, for the outcome
of preterm birth evaluated 4 RCTs involving 927 women,
demonstrated that fish oil or DHA-enriched eggs supple-
mentation significantly reduced preterm deliveries
Eur J Nutr
123
\37 weeks; data on delivery before 34 completed weeks
showed the same trend.
With regard to the influence of n-3 LC-PUFA supple-
mentation during pregnancy on growth measure at birth,
results are conflicting.
Szajewska et al. [2] reported that only head circumfer-
ence was significantly higher in the n-3 LC-PUFA sup-
plemented group.
Salvig and Lamont [25] described a mean birth weight
in women who received n-3 PUFA during pregnancy
higher by 71 g than that of women who did not receive the
treatment.
On the contrary, a Cochrane review [27] covering 15
RCTs and involving 1,889 term infants reported that none
of the studies considered showed beneficial effects of LC-
PUFA supplementation on weight, length and head cir-
cumference until 3 years of age. The results were the same
regardless of the type, concentration and duration of LC-
PUFA supplementation.
As described in a systematic review by Larque et al.
[10], the higher birth weight after n-3 LC-PUFA sup-
plementation during pregnancy could be probably due to
a greater length of these pregnancies; moreover, the
authors cited a study in which the difference in birth
weight disappeared when using the gestational age as
covariable.
The evidences so far produced do not support the routine
use of marine oil, or other PG precursor, supplements
during pregnancy to reduce the risk of preterm birth and
low birth weight, even if it has been reported an association
of maternal fatty acid intake with risk of preterm birth
\34 weeks of gestation. No advice can be given to their
rational use to avoid preterm deliveries in low- or high-risk
pregnancies; further research is required to establish this
therapeutic effect.
Allergic diseases
The biological activities of n-3 LC-PUFA have led inves-
tigators to hypothesize that maternal supplementation with
n-3 LC-PUFA during pregnancy and lactation may mod-
ulate immune response and allergy in neonates and
children.
The predisposition to allergic diseases may result from
insufficiently balanced T helper cell type 1 and 2 (Th1 and
Th2) pathways during fetal life. A possible mechanism
whereby n-3 LC-PUFA may alter the T helper cell balance
is through suppression of interleukin-13 (IL-13) production
which may be related to allergic diseases through its role in
inducing immunoglobulin E (IgE) synthesis in B cells and
Th2-type differentiation in T cells [28].
DHA and EPA also competitively inhibit the metabo-
lism of AA, resulting in reduced production of the ‘‘pro-
allergic four-series leukotrienes’’ and the two-series pros-
taglandins [28].
There are so far a number of studies investigating the
role of n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation in the development
and progression of atopy, childhood asthma and other
allergic diseases [29, 30].
Anandan et al. [29] conducted a systematic review and
meta-analysis of 6 RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of
LC-PUFA oil supplementation for the primary prevention
of sensitization, eczema/atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis,
asthma and other allergic disorders. Four of these RCTs
involved n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation and the others
involved n-6 LC-PUFA supplementation; both studies of
n-3 supplementation and n-6 supplementation were com-
bined. The results from well-conducted experimental
studies suggested that supplementation with n-3 and/or n-6
LC-PUFA oils was unlikely to be associated with a marked
reduction in risk of developing sensitization or allergic
disease.
On the contrary, a subsequent systematic review and
meta-analysis of 5 RCTs (949 participants) by Klemens
et al. [30] investigated the role of pregnancy and/or preg-
nancy and lactation n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation in
infant and childhood allergy, asthma, atopy and inflam-
matory markers (IL-13 and interferon-gamma). Authors
described a significant reduction in the incidence of asthma
(2 RCTs, involving 482 participants) and response to skin
prick tests (2 RCTs, involving 187 participants) in children
of mothers who received n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation
when compared to children of mothers receiving placebo.
A further significant difference was found in IL-13 levels
in cord blood.
Supplementation during lactation only did not signifi-
cantly affect these and other atopic outcome.
One of the sections of the most recent systematic review
by Kremmida et al. [31] evaluated five epidemiological
studies that investigated the association between maternal
fish intake in pregnancy and perinatal life (4 RCTs) and
during lactation (one study) and atopic outcomes in the
offspring of these mothers. In each of these observational
studies, maternal fish consumption had a protective effect
between 25 and 95 %; only the study investigating the
effects of maternal fish intake during lactation did not
report any significant association [32].
Another section of this systematic review [31] reported
five RCTs investigating the effects of fish oil supplemen-
tation during pregnancy or lactation on immune or atopic
outcomes in the offspring during infancy or childhood.
These studies reported that fish oil supplementation during
pregnancy and/or lactation is associated with immunologic
changes in cord blood and could impact on allergic sensi-
tization and on the development of atopic disease. How-
ever, authors prospect that these findings need to be
Eur J Nutr
123
confirmed by future and adequately powered trials in order
to examine clinical outcomes in the offspring later or in life
to inform recommendations [31].
Summarizing, the effects of n-3 LC-PUFA supplemen-
tation on reducing allergic disease in children seems very
promising, but more trials are recommended to clarify
when and how supplementation should be administered in
order to optimize the benefits.
Preeclampsia
Supplementation with n-3 LC-PUFA has been proposed as
a potential strategy to prevent preeclampsia, a pregnancy
complication associated with vasoconstriction and endo-
thelial damage, because of the effects of n-3 LC-PUFA on
modulating inflammatory and vascular function [33].
However, to date, there is uncertainty regarding the
efficacy of increasing n-3 LC-PUFA intake during preg-
nancy in reducing the risk of preeclampsia.
In the meta-analysis of 6 RCTs by Szajewska et al. [2],
no significant difference in the rate of preeclampsia or
eclampsia was found between n-3 LC-PUFA supplemented
group and non-supplemented group.
Similar findings were reported by a Cochrane review
[24] in which there were no clear differences in the relative
risk of high blood pressure (5 trials, 1,831 women) or the
incidence of preeclampsia (four trials, 1,683 women)
between marine-oil-treated and control groups.
A subsequent meta-analysis of 4 RCTs focused on the
effect of LC-PUFA supplementation during high-risk
pregnancy [26] demonstrated that no difference in the rate
of preeclampsia was found (one RCT involving 321
woman).
Despite observational literature supported an association
between lowered maternal n-3 LC-PUFA levels and pre-
eclampsia, RCTs have not demonstrated any benefit for
supplementation. Therefore, this clinical uncertainty is a
prerequisite for more large-scale RCTs to evaluate the
influence and the available treatment options of such
interventions.
Postpartum depression
Because a mother actively transfers DHA to her fetus and
nursing infant [4], a deficiency may result if dietary intake
is not adequate. Observational studies suggest an associa-
tion between a low maternal DHA status after pregnancy
and the occurrence of postpartum depression (PPD) [34,
35].
There has been conflicting evidence of efficacy from the
available clinical trials because the effect of n-3 LC-PUFA
supplementation during pregnancy on maternal depression
has been addressed in very few and not very well-con-
ducted studies.
In a recent systematic review of 7 placebo-controlled
trials of n-3 LC-PUFA for prevention or treatment of
perinatal depression, which involved 612 women who were
supplemented during pregnancy and/or post partum, Jans
et al. [36] did not find significant change in depressive
symptoms.
Interestingly, the authors reported that only one study
randomized double-blind placebo-controlled reported a
beneficial effect of n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation (2.2 g
EPA ? 1.2 g DHA) on perinatal depression in Taiwanese
women [37]; therefore, Jans et al. advocated the impor-
tance of replicating this finding using a larger and multi-
ethnic study population [36].
Authors also reported that the results of this meta-ana-
lysis were not in agreement with two previous meta-anal-
yses on the efficacy of n-3 LC-PUFA for unipolar major
depression in which n-3 LC-PUFA treatment showed
benefits when compared to placebo group; these discrep-
ancies were probably due by the significant heterogeneity
of the two previous meta-analyses [36].
Even if the available evidence seems to suggest that
EPA and/or DHA supplementation is more likely to be
beneficial in treating existing symptoms of perinatal
depression than in preventing perinatal depression, to date,
literature doesn’t support n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation
in order to prevent or treat perinatal depression.
Conclusions
Maternal n-3 LC-PUFA status during pregnancy may
influence a number of maternal and infant outcomes.
Actually, as shown in Table 1, there are some evidences
from meta-analyses and review articles that maternal n-3
LC-PUFA supplementation may reduce risk for early pre-
term birth \34 weeks and seems very promising for pri-
mary allergy prevention during childhood.
On the contrary, there are not sufficient data proving that
the consumption of oils rich in n-3 LC-PUFA during
pregnancy optimizes child’s visual and neurodevelopment
and reduce the risk for preeclampsia and perinatal
depression; the implications of these findings remain to be
elucidated.
Maternal lifestyle and nutrition have long been recog-
nized as important factors for both perinatal health and for
the long-term health of the infant; particular attention
should be paid to population groups at risk such as smokers
and vegans and non-fish-eating vegetarians.
The relationship between n-3 LC-PUFA and smoking
status is a controversial topic [38, 39].
Eur J Nutr
123
Ta
ble
1S
um
mar
yo
fth
em
eta-
anal
ysi
san
dsy
stem
atic
rev
iew
sd
escr
ibin
gth
eef
fect
so
fn
-3L
C-P
UF
Asu
pp
lem
enta
tio
nd
uri
ng
pre
gn
ancy
and
/or
lact
atio
no
nin
fan
tan
dm
ater
nal
ou
tco
mes
Infa
nt
and
mat
ern
alo
utc
om
es
Vis
ual
dev
elo
pm
ent
Co
gn
itiv
e
dev
elo
pm
ent
Ges
tati
on
al
len
gth
Pre
term
bir
th(\
34
wee
k
ges
tati
on
;\3
7w
eek
ges
tati
on
)
Gro
wth
mea
sure
at
bir
th
Bir
th
wei
gh
t
All
erg
icd
isea
ses
Pre
ecla
mp
sia
Po
stp
artu
m
dep
ress
ion
Lo
etal
.[1
2]
$$
Go
uld
etal
.[9
]$
$S
zaje
wsk
aet
al.
[2]
:$
:(h
ead
circ
um
fere
nce
)
$
Mak
rid
eset
al.
[24
]:
:(\
34
wee
kg
esta
tio
n)
$S
alv
igan
dL
amo
nt
[25
]:
::
Ho
rvat
etal
.[2
5]
:(\
34
wee
kg
esta
tio
n)
Sim
mer
etal
.[2
7]
$(h
ead
circ
um
fere
nce
and
len
gth
)
$
An
and
etal
.[2
9]
$K
lem
ens
etal
.[3
0]
:(a
sth
ma
and
resp
on
se
tosk
inp
rick
test
s)
Kre
mm
ida
etal
.[3
1]
:
Ho
rvat
het
al.
[26]
$Ja
ns
etal
.[3
6]
$
:si
gn
ifica
nt
dif
fere
nce
bet
wee
nsu
pp
lem
ente
dg
rou
pan
dco
ntr
ol
gro
up
$n
osi
gn
ifica
nt
dif
fere
nce
bet
wee
nsu
pp
lem
ente
dg
rou
pan
dco
ntr
ol
gro
up
Eur J Nutr
123
Mothers’ smoking habits are associated with reduced
pools of LC-PUFA in their infants at birth. As previously
described by Agostoni et al. [40], the product/precursor
ratios, markers of LC-PUFA synthesis, are progressively
reduced in infants born to smoking mothers according to
smoking duration during pregnancy because maternal
smoking could, at least partly, interfere with the biosyn-
thesis and consequently the incorporation of LC-PUFA,
particularly DHA, in infants’ tissues [40]. In addition, the
pro-oxidative state characteristic of smokers might be
expected to accelerate the destruction of LC-PUFA like
EPA and DHA [39].
Although conversion from ALA to EPA and DHA
occurs, this is limited, and diets that do not include fish and
eggs (e.g., vegans and non-fish-eating vegetarians) gener-
ally guarantee a low EPA and DHA dietary intake.
Therefore, vegetarian and vegan diets, which are generally
rich in n-6 LC-PUFA, may be marginal in n-3 LC-PUFA
[41, 42], and vegetarians, particularly vegans, tend to have
lower blood levels of EPA and DHA than nonvegetarians
[43].
The implications of n-3 LC-PUFA supplementation on
fetal development, maternal outcomes and later infant
growth is worth being elucidated and is promising in its
potential for a positive impact on fetal and maternal
outcomes.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict
of interest.
References
1. Calder PC (2012) The role of marine omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids in
inflammatory processes, atherosclerosis and plaque stability. Mol
Nutr Food Res 56:1073–1080
2. Szajewska H, Horvath A, Koletzko B (2006) Effect of n–3 long-
chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation of women with
low-risk pregnancies on pregnancy outcomes and growth mea-
sures at birth: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Am J Clin Nutr 83:1337–1344
3. Mozurkewich EL (2012) Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24:72–77
4. Hanebutt FL, Demmelmair H, Schiessl B et al (2008) Long-chain
polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA) transfer across the pla-
centa. Clin Nutr 27(5):685–693
5. Larque E, Demmelmair H, Berger B et al (2003) In vivo inves-
tigation of the placental transfer of (13)C-labelled fatty acids in
humans. J Lipid Res 44(1):49–55
6. Haggarty P, Ashton J, Joynson M et al (1999) Effect of maternal
polyunsaturated fatty acid concentration on transport by the
human placenta. Biol Neonate 75(6):350–359
7. Morse NL (2012) Benefits of docosahexaenoic acid, folic acid,
vitamin D and iodine on foetal and infant brain development and
function following maternal supplementation during pregnancy
and lactation. Nutrients 4:799–840
8. Dziechciarz P, Horvath A, Szajewska H (2010) Effects of n-3
long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation during
pregnancy and/or lactation on neurodevelopment and visual
function in children: a systematic review of randomized con-
trolled trials. J Am Coll Nutr 29(5):443–454
9. Gould JF, Smithers GL, Makrides M (2013) The effect of
maternal omega-3 (n-3) LCPUFA supplementation during preg-
nancy on early childhood cognitive and visual development: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled
trials. Am J Clin Nutr 97:531–544
10. Larque E, Sanchez GA, Prieto-Sanchez MT, Koletzko B (2012)
Omega 3 fatty acids, gestation and pregnancy outcomes. Brit J
Nutr 107:S77–S84
11. Luchtman DW, Song C (2013) Cognitive enhancement by
omega-3 fatty acids from child-hood to old age: findings from
animal and clinical studies. Neuropharmacology 64:550–565
12. Lo A, Sienna J, Mamak E et al (2012) The effects of maternal
supplementation of polyunsaturated fatty acids on visual, neuro-
behavioural, and developmental outcomes of the child: a sys-
tematic review of the randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol Int.
doi:10.1155/2012/591531
13. Judge MP, Harel O, Lammi-Keefe CJ (2007) A docosahexaenoic
acid-functional food during pregnancy benefits infant visual
acuity at four but not 6 months of age. Lipids 42(2):117–122
14. Malcolm CA, Hamilton R, McCulloch DL et al (2003) Scotopic
electroretinogram in term infants born of mothers supplemented
with docosahexaenoic acid during pregnancy. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 44(8):3685–3691
15. Helland IB, Saugstad OD, Smith L et al (2001) Similar effects on
infants of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids supplementation to pregnant and
lactating women. Pediatrics 108(5):E82
16. Helland IB, Smith L, Saarem K et al (2003) Maternal supple-
mentation with very-long-chain n-3 fatty acids during pregnancy
and lactation augments children’s IQ at 4 years of age. Pediatrics
111(16):E39–E44
17. Helland IB, Smith L, Blomen B et al (2008) Effect of supple-
menting pregnant and lactating mothers with n-3 very-long-chain
fatty acids on children’s iq and body mass index at 7 years of age.
Pediatrics 122(2):E472–E479
18. Judge MP, Harel O, Lammi-Keefe CJ (2007) Maternal con-
sumption of a docosahexaenoic acid-containing functional food
during pregnancy: benefit for infant performance on problem-
solving but not on recognition memory tasks at age 9 months.
Am J Clin Nutr 85(6):1572–1577
19. Dunstan JA, Simmer K, Dixon G et al (2008) Cognitive assess-
ment of children at age 2 (1/2) years after maternal fish oil
supplementation in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.
Arch Dis Child 93(1):F45–F50
20. Szajewska H, Makrides M (2011) Is early nutrition related to
short-term health and long-term outcome? Ann Nutr Metab
58:38–48
21. No authors listed (2009) Alternative medicine review
14(4):391–399
22. Olsen SF, Hansen HS, Sorensen TI et al (1993) Intake of marine
fat, rich in (n–3)-polyunsaturated fatty acids, may increase
birthweight by prolonging gestation. Lancet 1986(2):367–369
23. Olsen SF, Grandjean P, Weihe P, Videro T (1993) Frequency of
seafood intake in pregnancy as a determinant of birth weight:
evidence for a dose dependent relationship. J Epidemiol Com-
munity Health 47:436–440
24. Makrides M, Duley L, Olsen SF (2006) Marine oil, and other
prostaglandin precursor, supplementation for pregnancy uncom-
plicated by pre-eclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19(3): CD003402
25. Salvig JD, Lamont RF (2011) Evidence regarding an effect of
marine n-3 fatty acids on preterm birth: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica C
_ 2011 Nordic Federation of Societies. Obstet Gynecol
90:825–838
Eur J Nutr
123
26. Horvath A, Koletzko B, Szajewska H (2007) Effect of supple-
mentation of women in high-risk pregnancies with long-chain
polyunsaturated fatty acids on pregnancy outcomes and growth
measures at birth: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Br J Nutr 98(2):253–259
27. Simmer K, Patole SK, Rao SC (2011) Long-chain polyunsatu-
rated fatty acid supplementation in infants born at term. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858
28. Calder PC, Kremmyda LS, Vlachava M et al (2010) 3rd inter-
national immunonutrition workshop session 5: early program-
ming of the immune system and the role of nutrition is there a
role for fatty acids in early life programming of the immune
system? Proc Nutr Soc 69:373–380
29. Anandan C, Nurmatov Sheikhconduct A (2009) Omega 3 and 6
oils for primary prevention of allergic disease: systematic review
and meta-analysis. Allergy 64:840–848
30. Klemens CM, Berman DR, Mozurkewich EL (2011) The effect
of perinatal omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on inflammatory
markers and allergic diseases: a systematic review. BJOG
118:916–925
31. Kremmyda LS, Vlachava M, Noakes PS et al (2011) Atopy risk
in infants and children in relation to early exposure to fish, oily
fish, or long-chain omega-3 fatty acids: a systematic review. Clin
Rev Allergy Immunol 41(1):36–66
32. Lauritzen L, Kjaer TMR, Fruekilde MB et al (2005) Fish oil
supplementation of lactating mothers affects cytokine production
in 2 1/2-year-old children. Lipids 40:669–676
33. Zhou SJ, Yelland L, McPhee AJ et al (2012) Fish-oil supple-
mentation in pregnancy does not reduce the risk of gestational
diabetes or preeclampsia. Am J Clin Nutr 95:1378–1384
34. De Vriese SR, Christophe AB, Maes M (2003) Lowered serum
n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) levels predict the
occurrence of postpartum depression: further evidence that low-
ered n-PUFAs are related to major depression. Life Sci
73:3181–3187
35. Golding J, Steer C, Emmett P et al (2009) High levels of
depressive symptoms in pregnancy with low omega-3 fatty acid
intake from fish. Epidemiology 20:598–603
36. Jans LAW, Giltay EJ, Van der Doesdid AJW (2010) The efficacy
of n-3 fatty acids DHA and EPA (fish oil) for perinatal depres-
sion. Br J Nutr 104:1577–1585
37. Su KP, Huang SY, Chiu TH et al (2008) Omega-3 fatty acids for
major depressive disorder during pregnancy: results from a ran-
domized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry
69:644–651
38. Kim YJ, Jeong DW, Lee JG et al (2012) Omega-3 index and
smoking in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction
taking statins: a case-control study in Korea. Lipid Health Dis 11:43
39. Block RC, Harris WS (2008) Determinants of blood cell omega-3
fatty acid content. Open Biomark J 1:1–6
40. Agostoni C, Riva E, Giovannini M et al (2008) Maternal smoking
habits are associated with differences in infants’ long-chain
polyunsaturated fatty acids in whole blood: a case-control study.
Arch Dis Child 93:414–418
41. Craig WJ (2009) Health effects of vegan diets. Am J Clin Nutr
89:1627S–1633S
42. Sanders TAB (2009) DHA status of vegetarians. Prostaglandins
Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 81:137–141
43. Craig WJ, Mangels AR, American Dietetic Association (2009)
Position of the American dietetic association: vegetarian diets.
J Am Diet Assoc 109(7):1266–1282
Eur J Nutr
123