13
1 N-OCTADECYL MERCAPTAN (ODM) N-Octadecyl mercaptan is one of these chemicals where no or little data is available regarding their environmental impact. The chemical fate and pathways of ODM to the environment has not been assessed before along with its PBT status. An assessment of the PBT status of N-Octadecyl mercaptan (ODM) using the algorithm described in the toolbox is explained below step by step. Step 1: Substance identification Identifiers on ODM have been obtained from the most recent reliable sources chemfinder and chemspider which is listed in step 1 . Unfortunately no IUCLID data is available for this chemical. The smiles notation for N-OCTADECYL MERCAPTAN was obtained from the chemspider source. These identifiers are shown in Table 1 below. Identifier of N-Octadecyl mercaptan EINECS or ELINCS number 220-744-1 CAS name and CAS number 2885-00-9 Name(s) in the IUPAC nomenclature or other international chemical name(s) 1-Octadecanethiol Other names (usual name, trade name, abbreviation) 1-Mercaptooctadecane, n-Octadecyl mercaptan, Stearyl mercaptan, n- Octadecanethiol Information related to molecular and structural formula of N-Octadecyl mercaptan Molecular Formula C 18 H 38 S Structural formula Smiles Notation CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCS Table 1: N-Octadecyl mercaptan identification parameters. SH

N-OCTADECYL MERCAPTAN (ODM) report.pdf · 2019. 10. 10. · Octadecyl mercaptan is not highly bioaccumulative. 3- Degradation data of N-Octadecyl mercaptan. The following table provides

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1

    N-OCTADECYL MERCAPTAN (ODM)

    N-Octadecyl mercaptan is one of these chemicals where no or little data is available

    regarding their environmental impact. The chemical fate and pathways of ODM to the

    environment has not been assessed before along with its PBT status. An assessment of the

    PBT status of N-Octadecyl mercaptan (ODM) using the algorithm described in the toolbox is

    explained below step by step.

    Step 1: Substance identification

    Identifiers on ODM have been obtained from the most recent reliable sources chemfinder and

    chemspider which is listed in step 1. Unfortunately no IUCLID data is available for this

    chemical. The smiles notation for N-OCTADECYL MERCAPTAN was obtained from the

    chemspider source. These identifiers are shown in Table 1 below.

    Identifier of N-Octadecyl mercaptan

    EINECS or ELINCS number 220-744-1

    CAS name and CAS number 2885-00-9

    Name(s) in the IUPAC nomenclature orother international chemical name(s)

    1-Octadecanethiol

    Other names (usual name, trade name,abbreviation)

    1-Mercaptooctadecane, n-Octadecylmercaptan, Stearyl mercaptan, n-Octadecanethiol

    Information related to molecular andstructural formula of N-OctadecylmercaptanMolecular Formula C18H38S

    Structural formula

    Smiles Notation CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCS

    Table 1: N-Octadecyl mercaptan identification parameters.

    SH

    http://chembiofinderbeta.cambridgesoft.com/http://www.chemspider.com/http://www.reach-serv.com//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=58&Itemid=82MoonyTextBoxN-octadecyl mercaptan (ODM)

  • 2

    Step 2: Data needed for the assessment

    These are divided into the followings:

    Physical-chemical properties (water solubility, Partition coefficient n-

    octanol/water, Soil Adsorption Coefficient (KOC/Kd), and Henry's Law Constant)

    Degradation, (biodegradation, half lives)

    Accumulation (BCF)

    Environmental Partitioning (MacKay)

    Ecotoxicity data of the substance (LC50, NOEC)

    Step 3: Collecting the available information and identifying the data gap

    1- Information on the physical-chemical properties for N-Octadecyl mercaptan

    The following table provides a summary of the

    1. Chemical and physical properties required for the assessment as explained in the

    algorithm.

    2. The available chemical and physical properties of N-Octadecyl mercaptan along with

    the source for these data. As explained in the algorithm, in this step you have to make

    sure that the data studies were conducted according to EU-approved methods (e.g.

    those specified in Annexes V and VIII of Directive 67/548/EEC, or REACH Annex X

    methods) and in compliance with the principles of GLP.

    3. The data gap which is highlighted as red in the table

    Required Property Value SourceWater solubility Insoluble but no measured value is

    available.MSDS and NIOSH PocketGuide to Chemical Hazards

    Partition coefficient n-octanol/water

    Log Kow = 9.12 (estimated notmeasured)

    ChemID plus and chemspider

    Soil AdsorptionCoefficient (Koc/Kd)

    No measured log Koc value isavailable for N-Octadecylmercaptan.

  • 3

    Henry's Law Constant No experimentally determinedHenry’s law constant information isavailable.

    Table2: Physical chemical data available for N-Octadecyl mercaptan.

    2- Accumulation data of N-Octadecyl mercaptan

    According to MITI result (Biodegradation and Bioaccumulation Database on Existing

    Chemicals, Japan (MITI), see step 3 for link), bioaccumulation of N-Octadecyl mercaptan

    was studied with common carp (Cyprinus carpio). The mean BCF measured from this study

    was approximately

  • 4

    5- Aquatic toxicity information of N-Octadecyl mercaptan

    Not measured data is available.

    Required Property Value Source

    FishAcute toxicity to fish(96hrs LC50) mg/l

    No data available IUCLID

    Long term toxicity to fish(28days NOEC) mg/l

    No data available IUCLID

    DaphniaAcute toxicity to Daphnia(48hrs EC50) mg/l

    No data available IUCLID

    Long term toxicity to Daphnia(21days NOEC) mg/l

    No data available IUCLID

    AlgaeAcute toxicity to algae(72hrs EC50) mg/l

    No data available IUCLID

    Table4: Aquatic toxicity data available for N-Octadecyl mercaptan

    Step 4: Filling the data gap by using QSAR

    In this step the above endpoints (both the available and not) will be predicted using QSAR

    tools and software listed in step 4 of the algorithm (EPIWIN, Danish(Q)SAR data base and

    PBT profiler). The reason for doing this is to compare the QSAR results with the

    experimental one to identify the accurate of the QSAR. However, as seen above no

    experimental data is available for ODM and hence no comparison could be carried out.

    1- Results obtained by using EPIWIN

    Table 5 provides the predicted values for the above endpoints using EPIWIN software along

    with the name of the programme used. The output obtained by EPIWIN for each end point is

  • 5

    given. Also included is explanation, which in the toolbox would be obtained by clicking on a

    link to view.

    Required Property EPI QSARProgramme

    Predicted Value

    Water solubility WSKOW

    (result output)

    2.36*10-4 mg/l at 25 0C

    Partition coefficient n-octanol/water

    KOWWIN log KOW = 9.12 ( not very accurate since it is outside theregion of log Kow 0-5).

    Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) BCFWIN LogBCF2 (Syracuse) = 0.5

    Soil Adsorption Coefficient(Koc/Kd)

    (PCKOCWIN) KOC= 4.26*105

    Henry's Law Constant HENRYWIN 3.23*10-1 atm-m3/mole

    Half lives-t1/2

    1-Hydrolysis as a function of pH HYDROWIN can not be estimated.

    2-Photolysis (Atmospheric OHRate Constant)

    AOPWIN Atmospheric OxidationRate Constant = 63.972 *10-12 cm3/molecule-secHalf-Life = 2.006 hrs

    ( Atmosph. Oxidation, Ozone) AOPWIN No Ozone Reaction Estimation

    Biodegradability

    BIOWIN1 BIOWIN 0.7196 (Biodegrades fast)

    BIOWIN2 BIOWIN 0.6864 (biodegrades fast)

    BIOWIN3 (Ultimatebiodegradation)

    BIOWIN 2.8642 (weeks)

    BIOWIN4 (PrimaryBiodegradation)

    BIOWIN 3.7034 (Days)

    BIOWIN5 BIOWIN 0.7001 (Readily Degradable)

    BIOWIN6 BIOWIN 0.8283(Readily Degradable)

    BIOWIN7 BIOWIN 0.8806 ( biodegrade fast)

    Ready Biodegradability Prediction BIOWIN Yes

    Environmental Partitioning

    (MacKay) EPI V3.2

    (Results output)

    Level III Fugacity Model:

    Mass Amount Half-Life

    (percent) (hr)

    Air 0.147 4.01

    http://www.reach-serv.com/uploads/ODMEPIWIN output results.pdfMoonyTextBoxResults output

    http://www.reach-serv.com/uploads/ODMEPIWIN3.2 output results.pdf

  • 6

    Water 3.75 360

    Soil 28 720

    Sediment 68.1 3.24e+003Aquatic toxicity:

    FishAcute toxicity to fish

    (96hrs LC50) mol/lLong term toxicity

    (28days NOEC) mol/l

    ECOSAR LC50 (96hrs) = 0.002 mg/l (not reliable because Chemicalmay not be soluble enough to measure this predicted

    effect)

    DaphniaAcute toxicity to Daphnia

    (48hrs EC50) mol/lLong term toxicity

    (21days NOEC) mol/l

    ECOSAR

    AlgaeAcute toxicity to Daphnia

    (72hrs EC50) mol/l

    ECOSAR

    Table5: EPIWIN predictions of the required endpoints

    2- Results obtained from Danish(Q)SAR database

    The Danish (Q)SAR report for N-Octadecyl mercaptan is shown below (Figures 1 and 2)

    with some comments. This output contains predictions for physical-chemical, environmental

    and human health endpoints, however, as we are only interested in selected physical-chemical

    endpoints along with the environmental endpoints these are highlighted in yellow or blue in

    the report. The yellow highlighter identifies the values that have been predicted in the Danish

    (Q)SAR using the EPIWIN suite and therefore we can check whether the results obtained

    directly with the EPIWIN suite agree (Table 5). The blue highlighter indicates to the values

    predicted using other QSAR models such as multicase which is used to predict the

    biodegradability.

  • 7

    Figure1: Danish(Q)SAR report for N-Octadecyl mercaptan

  • 8

    Figure2: Danish(Q)SAR report for N-Octadecyl mercaptan

  • 9

    Before proceeding to step 5, it is useful to compare the predicted values obtained from

    EPIWIN with the Danish(Q)SAR database (see Table 6). In this way the reproducibility of

    EPIWIN predictions can be tested as explained previously.

    As expected, we could see that t the predictions from the EPIWIN suite are consistent with

    the one obtained from the Danish(Q)SAR ( Log Kow, Log Koc and Henry's Law Constant, see

    Table 6). However, the predicted parameters from using QSARs other than EPIWIN which

    are listed in Danish(Q)SAR report are different form EPIWIN. An example for this can be

    seen in the biodegradability result. This is an important aspect for the assessment as these

    numerical values are crucial for determining if the PBT criteria are met.

    Required Property Predicted Value usingDanish(Q)SAR database

    Predicted Value using EPIWIN

    Water solubility 0.002mg/l 2.36*10-4 mg/l at 25 0C

    Partition coefficient n-octanol/water

    log Kow =9.12 log KOW = 9.12 ( not very accurate since it isoutside the region of log Kow 0-5).

    Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) LogBCF2 (Syracuse) = 0.5, BCF =3.16Log BCF(Bintien) = 1.68, BCF =47.86

    LogBCF2 (Syracuse) = 0.5

    Soil Adsorption Coefficient(Koc/Kd)

    log Koc = 5.629 log Koc = 5.629, KOC= 4.26*105

    Henry's Law Constant 0.232 atm-m3/mole 0.323 atm-m3/mole

    Half lives-t1/2

    1-Hydrolysis as a function of Ph N/A

    2-Photolysis (Atmospheric OHRate Constant)

    0.167 days which is equal to2.006hrs

    Atmospheric OxidationRate Constant = 63.972 *10-12

    cm3/molecule-sec

    Half-Life = 0.167 Days (12-hr day; 1.5E6OH/cm3)Half-Life = 2.006 hrs

    ( Atmosph. Oxidation, Ozone) N/A Can not be estimated

    Biodegradability

    BIOWIN1 0.7196 0.7196 (Biodegrades fast)

    BIOWIN2 0.6864 0.6864 (biodegrades fast)

  • 10

    BIOWIN3 (Ultimatebiodegradation)

    2.8642 2.8642 (weeks)

    BIOWIN4 (PrimaryBiodegradation)

    3.7034 3.7034 (Days)

    BIOWIN5 0.7001 0.7001 (Readily Degradable)

    BIOWIN6 0.8283 0.8283(Readily Degradable)

    BIOWIN (Ready BiodegradabilityPrediction)

    Yes

    Multicase (Ready BiodegradabilityPrediction) NEGEnvironmental Partitioning

    (MacKay, (III)) Air(%) 0.293

    Water (%) 7.28

    Soil(%) 27.9

    Sediment(%) 64.5

    Air (%) 0.147

    Water (%) 3.75

    Soil (%) 28

    Sediment (%) 68.1FishAcute toxicity to fish (96hrs LC50)mol/lLong term toxicity

    (28days NOEC) mol/l

    LC50 (96hrs) for Bintein:

    = 140.4mg/l (non-polar)

    =296.33mg/l (Polar)

    LC50 (96hrs) for Syracuse:

    = 738.6mg/l (non-polar)

    =172.19mg/l (Polar)

    LC50 (96hrs) = 0.002 mg/l (not reliablebecause Chemical may not be soluble

    enough to measure this predicted effect)

    DaphniaAcute toxicity to Daphnia (48hrsEC50) mol/lLong term toxicity

    (21days NOEC) mol/l

    Value can not be considered since itis outside the model domain

    AlgaeAcute toxicity to Daphnia (72hrsEC50) mol/l

    Value can not be considered since itis outside the model domain

    Table6: Comparison between the results obtained from EPIWIN, Danish(Q)SAR and theexperimental one.

    Step 5: Assess your substance to identify whether it is PBT or vPvB

    Is your substance persistent? (Degradation properties)

  • 11

    The assessment of persistence is based on the degradation data. As seen above, no measured

    data is available on the rate of degradation of N-Octadecyl mercaptan in the environment.

    Where no measured environmental degradation data are available, the predicted one can be

    used as a screen to indicate persistence.

    The predicted rate constant and estimated half-life for the reaction of hydroxyl radicals with

    N-Octadecyl mercaptan in the atmosphere indicated that when N-Octadecyl mercaptan is

    released to the atmosphere is likely to be rapidly degraded (not persistence) by this fate

    process. Moreover no data was available with regards to aquatic degradation. As a result a

    definitive conclusion cannot be reached regarding persistence of N-Octadecyl mercaptan in

    the Environment. Further testing would be needed to determine the rate of aquatic

    degradation.

    In this case the ready biodegradability result can be used to determine if a substance meets

    the P criteria. The DEPA Multicase (Q)SAR (see Table 6 ) gives a prediction that the

    substance is not readily biodegradable. This is in contrast with BIOWIN v4.02 which gives

    an overall prediction that the substance is readily biodegradable. In this condition when two

    different predictions for the same endpoint exist, the one, which indicates the higher risk, will

    be used. Moreover, the PBT Profiler has estimated that ODM is expected to be found

    predominantly in sediment and its persistence estimate is based on its transformation in this

    medium. Its half-life in sediment, 140 days, exceeds the EPA criteria of >= 2 months but not

    the EU criteria of 180 days. Therefore, ODM is estimated to be persistent in the environment.

    As a conclusion, based on the ready biodegradability prediction results (multicase) and PBT

    profiler, N-Octadecyl mercaptan is considered to meet the screening criteria for persistence.

    Is your substance bioaccumlative?

    The assessment of bioaccumlative is based on the measured BCF. According to MITI result,

    bioaccumulation of N-Octadecyl mercaptan was studied with common carp (Cyprinus

    carpio). The mean BCF measured from this study was approximately

  • 12

    profiler and multicase. Both BCFWIN v2.17 and PBT profiler predict BCF of 3.16 for N-

    Octadecyl mercaptan based on logKOW of –1.08. Multicase prediction for BCF is slightly

    higher but still does not exceed the EU bioconcentration criteria and therefore, N-Octadecyl

    mercaptan is considered not to meet the screening criteria for bioaccumulation.

    Is your substance toxic to the environment organisms?

    No data is available for toxicity of ODM to fish, Daphnia and algae. In the absence of reliable

    toxicity data, the predicted one can be used as a screen to indicate toxicity to aquatic

    organisms. Unfortunately, results from a (Q)SAR investigation of the acute and chronic

    toxicity to fish and Daphnia cannot be considered since ODM is appeared clearly outside the

    applicability domain of the ECOSAR models (log KOW>6). Therefore, the criteria for toxicity

    cannot be determined and further testing will be required to confirm if the criteria for toxicity

    are met.

    Is your chemical classified as potential PBT?

    On the basis of the available data, the screening criteria for PBT/vPvB cannot be determined

    due to the lack of the information regarding its toxicity. ODM is considered to be persistent

    but not bioaccumulative based on the screening criteria. This is in agreement with PBT

    profiler estimate for N-Octadecyl mercaptan. The PBT Profiler has estimated that N-

    Octadecyl mercaptan is persistent not bioaccumulative while its toxicity could not be

    estimated. Further testing will be required to confirm if the criteria for persistence,

    bioaccumulation and toxicity are met.

    What is the preferred environmental compartment of your chemical? (Environmental

    Distribution )

    The PBT Profiler has estimated that N-Octadecyl mercaptan is expected to be found

    predominantly in sediment and its persistence estimate is based on its transformation in this

    medium. This is in agreement with Mackay level III predictions which shows that that

    sediment is the preferred environmental compartment (68%). Its half-life in sediment, 140

    days, exceeds the EPA criteria but not EU. Therefore, N-Octadecyl mercaptan is estimated to

    be persistent in the environment under the EPA criteria.

  • 13

    Text1: