Upload
ibrahim-sener
View
231
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
1/25
Spontaneous symmetry breaking in particlephysics: a case of cross fertilization
Yoichiro Nambulecture presented by Giovanni Jona-Lasinio
Nobel LectureDecember 8, 2008
1/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
2/25
History repeats itself1960 Midwest Conference in Theoretical Physics, Purdue University
2/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
3/25
Nambus backgroundY. Nambu, preliminary Notes for the Nobel Lecture
I will begin by a short story about my background. Istudied physics at the University of Tokyo. I wasattracted to particle physics because of the three famousnames, Nishina, Tomonaga and Yukawa, who were the
founders of particle physics in Japan. But these peoplewere at different institutions than mine. On the otherhand, condensed matter physics was pretty good atTokyo. I got into particle physics only when I came backto Tokyo after the war. In hindsight, though, I must say
that my early exposure to condensed matter physics hasbeen quite beneficial to me.
3/25
http://find/http://goback/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
4/25
Spontaneous (dynamical) symmetry breaking
Figure: Elastic rod compressed by a force of increasing strength
4/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
5/25
Other examples
physical system broken symmetry
ferromagnets rotational invariancecrystals translational invariance
superconductors local gauge invariancesuperfluid 4He global gauge invariance
When spontaneous symmetry breaking takes place, the ground
state of the system is degenerate
5/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
6/25
SuperconductivityAutobiography in Broken Symmetry: Selected Papers of Y. Nambu, World Scientific
One day before publication of the BCS paper, BobSchrieffer, still a student, came to Chicago to give aseminar on the BCS theory in progress. . . . I was verymuch disturbed by the fact that their wave function didnot conserve electron number. It did not make sense.. . . At the same time I was impressed by their boldnessand tried to understand the problem.
6/25
http://find/http://goback/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
7/25
The mechanism of BCS theory of superconductivityY. Nambu, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 76, 111002 (2007)
The BCS theory assumed a condensate of chargedpairs of electrons or holes, hence the medium was not
gauge invariant. There were found intrinsically masslesscollective excitations of pairs (Nambu-Goldstone modes)that restored broken symmetries, and they turned intothe plasmons by mixing with the Coulomb field.
7/25
http://find/http://goback/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
8/25
Quasi-particles in superconductivity
Electrons near the Fermi surface are described by the followingequation
Ep,+ = pp,+ + p,
Ep, =
p
p, + p,+
with eigenvalues
E = 2p +
2
Here, p,+ and p, are the wavefunctions for an electron and a
hole of momentum p and spin +
8/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
9/25
Analogy with the Dirac equation
In the Weyl representation, the Dirac equations reads
E1 = ppp1 + m2E2 =
ppp2 + m1
with eigenvalues
E = p2 + m2
Here, 1 and 2 are the eigenstates of the chirality operator 5
9/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
10/25
Nambu-Goldstone boson in superconductivityY. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 117, 648 (1960)
Approximate expressions for the charge density and the currentassociated to a quasi-particle in a BCS superconductor
(x, t) 0 + 12
tf
jjj(x, t) jjj0 fwhere 0 = e
3Z and jjj0 = e(ppp/m)Y with Y, Z and
constants and f satisfies the wave equation
2 12t2f 2e2Here, = (
1, 2)
10/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
11/25
Plasmons
The Fourier transform of the wave equation for f gives
f 1q20 2q2
The pole at q20
= 2q2 describes the excitation spectrum of theNambu-Goldstone boson.
A better approximation reveals that, due to the Coulomb force,this spectrum is shifted to the plasma frequency e2n, where n is
the number of electrons per unit volume. In this way the field facquires a mass.
11/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
12/25
The axial vector currentY. Nambu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 380 (1960)
Electromagnetic current Axial current
5
The axial current is the analog of the electromagnetic current in
BCS theory. In the hypothesis of exact conservation, the matrixelements of the axial current between nucleon states offour-momentum p and p have the form
A
(p, p) = i5 2m5q/q2F(q2) q= p p
Conservation is compatible with a finite nucleon mass m providedthere exists a massless pseudoscalar particle, the Nambu-Goldstoneboson.
12/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
13/25
In Nature, the axial current is only approximately conserved.Nambus hypothesis was that the small violation of axial current
conservation gives a mass to the N-G boson, which is thenidentified with the meson. Under this hypothesis, one can write
A
(p, p) i5 2m5q
q2 + m2
F(q2) q= p p
This expression implies a relationship between the pion nucleoncoupling constant G, the pion decay coupling g and the axialcurrent -decay constant gA
2mgA 2GgThis is the GoldbergerTreiman relation
13/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
14/25
An encouraging calculationY. Nambu, G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961), Appendix
It was experimentally known that the ratio between the axialvector and vector -decay constants R = gA/gV was slightlygreater than 1 and about 1.25. The following two hypotheses werethen natural:
1. under strict axial current conservation there is no
renormalization of gA;
2. the violation of the conservation gives rise to the finite pionmass as well as to the ratio R > 1 so that there is somerelation between these quantities.
Under these assumptions a perturbative calculation gave a value ofR close to the experimental one. More important, therenormalization effect due to a positive pion mass went in the rightdirection.
14/25
http://find/http://goback/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
15/25
The NambuJona-Lasinio (NJL) modelY. Nambu, G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961)
The Lagrangian of the model is
L = + g()2 (5)2
It is invariant under ordinary and 5 gauge transformations
e i, ei e i5, e i5
15/25
Th f h NJL d l
http://find/http://goback/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
16/25
The spectrum of the NJL model
Mass equation
22
g2= 1 m
2
2ln
1 +
2
m2
where is the invariant cut-off
Spectrum of bound states
nucleon mass spin-parity spectroscopicnumber notation
0 0 0 1S00 2m 0+ 3P00 2 > 8
3m2 1 3P1
2 2 > 2m2 0+ 1S0
16/25
O h l f BCS SSB
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
17/25
Other examples of BCS type SSB
3He superfluidity
Nuleon pairing in nuclei
Fermion mass generation in the electro-weak sector of the
standard model
Nambu calls the last entry
my biased opinion, there being other interpretations as tothe nature of the Higgs field
17/25
B k d h f
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
18/25
Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesonsP. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 130, 439 (1963)F. Englert, R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964)P. W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964)
A simple example (Englert, Brout). Consider a complex scalar field = (1 + i2)/
2 interacting with an abelian gauge field A
Hint = ieA
e2AA
If the vacuum expectation value of is = 0, e.g. = 1/
2,the polarization loop for the field A in lowest orderperturbation theory is
(q) = (2)4ie212 g qq/q2Therefore the A field acquires a mass
2 = e212 and gaugeinvariance is preserved, q = 0.
18/25
N b t
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
19/25
Nambus commentY. Nambu, preliminary Notes for the Nobel Lecture
In hindsight I regret that I should have explored inmore detail the general mechanism of mass generation for
the gauge field. But I thought the plasma and theMeissner effect had already established it. I also shouldhave paid more attention to the Ginzburg-Landau theorywhich was a forerunner of the present Higgs description.
19/25
El t k ifi ti
http://goforward/http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
20/25
Electroweak unificationS. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967)
Leptons interact only with photons, and with theintermediate bosons that presumably mediate weakinteraction. What could be more natural than to unitethese spin-one bosons into a multiplet of gauge fields?
Standing in the way of this synthesis are the obviousdifferences in the masses of the photon and intermediatemeson, and in their couplings. We might hope tounderstand these differences by imagining that thesymmetries relating the weak and the electromagnetic
interactions are exact symmetries of the Lagrangian butare broken by the vacuum.
20/25
The NJL model as a lo energ effecti e theor of QCD
http://find/http://goback/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
21/25
The NJL model as a low-energy effective theory of QCDe.g. T. Hatsuda, T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994)
The NJL model has been reinterpreted in terms of quark variables.
One is interested in the low energy degrees of freedom on a scalesmaller than some cut-off 1 Gev. The short distance dynamicsabove is dictated by perturbative QCD and is treated as a smallperturbation. Confinement is also treated as a small perturbation.The total Lagrangian is then
LQCD LNJL + LKMT + (Lconf+ LOGE)
where the KobayashiMaskawat Hooft term
LKMT = gD deti,j
[qi(1 5)qj + h.c.]
mimics the axial anomaly and LOGE is the one gluon exchangepotential.
21/25
The mass hierarchy problem
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
22/25
The mass hierarchy problemY. Nambu, Masses as a problem and as a clue, May 2004
Unlike the internal quantum numbers like charge and spin,mass is not quantized in regular manner
Mass receives contributions from interactions. In other words,it is dynamical.
The masses form hierarchies. Hierarchical structure is anoutstanding feature of the universe in terms of size as well ofmass. Elementary particles are no exception.
22/25
http://find/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
23/25
Einstein used to express dissatisfaction with hisfamous equation of gravity
G = 8GT
His point was that, from an aesthetic point of view, theleft hand side of the equation which describes thegravitational field is based on a beautiful geometrical
principle, whereas the right hand side, which describeseverything else, . . . looks arbitrary and ugly.
. . . [today] Since gauge fields are based on a beautifulgeometrical principle, one may shift them to the left handside of Einsteins equation. What is left on the right are
the matter fields which act as the source for the gaugefields . . . Can one geometrize the matter fields and shifteverything to the left?
23/25
Hierarchical spontaneous symmetry breaking
http://find/http://goback/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
24/25
Hierarchical spontaneous symmetry breakingY. Nambu, Masses as a problem and as a clue, May 2004
The BCS mechanism is most relevant to the mass
problem because introduces an energy (mass) gap forfermions, and the Goldstone and Higgs modes aslow-lying bosonic states. An interesting feature of theSSB is the possibility of hierarchical SSB or tumbling.Namely an SSB can be a cause for another SSB at lowerenergy scale.
. . . [examples are]1. the chain crystalphononsuperconductivity. . . . Its
NG mode is the phonon which then induces the Cooper
pairing of electrons to cause superconductivity.2. the chain QCDchiral SSB of quarks and
hadrons and mesonsnuclei formation and nucleonpairingnuclear and modesnuclear collective modes.
24/25
Update of the NJL model
http://find/http://goback/8/2/2019 Nambu Slides
25/25
Update of the NJL model
25/25
http://find/http://goback/