Upload
jaiden-walbridge
View
218
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Naming and Measuring the
Impacts of Racism on Health
Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhDResearch Director on Social Determinants of Health
Emerging Investigations and Analytic Methods BranchDivision of Adult and Community Health
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Why discuss racism?
• To eliminate racial disparities in health, need examine fundamental causes– “Race” is only a rough proxy for SES,
culture, or genes– “Race” precisely measures the social
classification of people in our “race”-conscious society
• Hypothesize racism as a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health
What is racism?
A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of phenotype (“race”)
What is racism?
A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of phenotype (“race”)– Unfairly disadvantages some
individuals and communities
What is racism?
A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of phenotype (“race”)– Unfairly disadvantages some
individuals and communities– Unfairly advantages other individuals
and communities
What is racism?
A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of phenotype (“race”)– Unfairly disadvantages some individuals
and communities– Unfairly advantages other individuals and
communities– Saps the strength of the whole society
through the waste of human resources
Institutionalized racism
• Differential access to the goods, services, and opportunities of society, by “race”
• Examples– Housing, education, employment, income– Medical facilities– Clean environment– Information, resources, voice
• Explains the association between SES and “race”
Personally-mediated racism
• Differential assumptions about the abilities, motives, and intents of others, by “race”
• Prejudice and discrimination• Examples
– Police brutality– Physician disrespect– Shopkeeper vigilance– Waiter indifference– Teacher devaluation
Internalized racism
• Acceptance by the stigmatized “races” of negative messages about our own abilities and intrinsic worth
• Examples– Self-devaluation– White man’s ice is colder– Resignation, helplessness, hopelessness
• Accepting limitations to our full humanity
Institutionalized racism
• Initial historical insult
• Structural barriers• Inaction in face of
need• Societal norms• Biological
determinism• Unearned privilege
Personally-mediated racism
• Intentional• Unintentional• Acts of
commission• Acts of omission• Maintains
structural barriers• Condoned by
societal norms
Internalized racism
• Reflects systems of privilege
• Reflects societal values
• Erodes individual sense of value
• Undermines collective action
Who is the gardener?
• Power to decide• Power to act• Control of
resources
Dangerous when• Allied with one
group• Not concerned with
equity
“Reactions to Race” module
Piloted on 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System by:
CaliforniaDelawareFloridaNew HampshireNew MexicoNorth Carolina
Question 1
How do other people usually
classify you in this country?
Would you say White, Black or African
American, Hispanic or Latino, Asian, Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, American
Indian or Alaska Native, or some other group?
Two measures of “race”
White22,417
Black2,198
Hispanic2,694
White 95.2 0.9 3.0
Black 0.2 93.4 1.0
Hispanic
3.0 2.2 93.4
. . . 1.6 3.5 2.6
How
self-i
den
tify
How usually classified by others
Two measures of “race”
White Black Hispanic . . .
White21,658
98.6 0.1 0.4 0.9
Black2,197
1.6 93.5 1.2 3.7
Hispanic
3,39820.0 1.4 74.0 4.6H
ow
self
-id
en
tify
How usually classified by others
General health status
Would you say that in general your health is:
– Excellent– Very good– Good– Fair– Poor
020
4060
8010
0
39.4
55.1
63.1
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthHispanic-Hispanic Hispanic-White White-White
General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race"
020
4060
8010
0
39.4
55.1
63.1
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthHispanic-Hispanic Hispanic-White White-White
General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race"
24.8
18.9
12.7
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report fair or poor health
Asian NHOPI AIAN White . . .
Asian477
85.5 1.0 0.4 3.6 9.5
NHOPI
4914.3 32.7 8.2 16.3 28.5
AIAN479
0.6 1.7 57.8 24.4 15.5
How usually classified by others
How
self
-id
en
tify
020
4060
8010
0
33.7
66.263.1
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthAIAN-AIAN AIAN-White White-White
General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race"
020
4060
8010
0
33.7
66.263.1
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthAIAN-AIAN AIAN-White White-White
General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race"
37.6
15.312.7
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report fair or poor health
Question 2
How often do you think about your
race?
Would you say never, once a year, once a
month, once a week, once a day, once an
hour, or constantly?
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt
never yearly monthly weekly daily hourly constantly
White respondents (n = 21649, weighted)
57.1
14.6 12.4 7.9 5.4 0.1 2.5
"How often do you think about your race?", all six states, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt
never yearly monthly weekly daily hourly constantly
White respondents (n = 21649, weighted)
57.1
14.6 12.4 7.9 5.4 0.1 2.5
"How often do you think about your race?", all six states, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt
never yearly monthly weekly daily hourly constantly
Black respondents (n = 2093, weighted)
35.3
8.2 8.9 9.319
2.217.1
"How often do you think about your race?", all six states, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt
never yearly monthly weekly daily hourly constantly
White respondents (n = 21649, weighted)
57.1
14.6 12.4 7.9 5.4 0.1 2.5
"How often do you think about your race?", all six states, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt
never yearly monthly weekly daily hourly constantly
Black respondents (n = 2093, weighted)
35.3
8.2 8.9 9.319
2.217.1
"How often do you think about your race?", all six states, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt
never yearly monthly weekly daily hourly constantly
Hispanic respondents (n = 2619, weighted)
19.98.2 11.1 10.8 14.4
1.3
34.3
"How often do you think about your race?", all six states, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
California (n = 2737)
46.6
18 15.7 10.3 6.5 2.8
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
Delaware (n = 2828)
61.3
12.3 12.5 7.7 4.5 1.7
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
Florida (n = 4229)
66.8
11 9.1 5.6 5.1 2.5
How often do you think about your race? White respondents, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
New Hampshire (n = 4473)
62.8
15.4 11.4 5.7 3.4 1.3
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
New Mexico (n = 2703)
57.4
15 11.5 8.9 5.7 1.6
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
North Carolina (n = 4679)
69.8
11 8.7 4.9 3.8 1.7
How often do you think about your race? White respondents, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
California (n = 709)
16.4 8.4 11.6 11.9 16.735
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
Delaware (n = 64)
17.53.5 9.3 11.8 18.8
39
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
Florida (n = 397)
37.8
6.8 8.1 6.2 13.627.5
How often do you think about your race? Hispanic respondents, 2002 BRFSS
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
New Hampshire (n = 41)
39.9
6.9 10.4 18.5 11.3 13
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
New Mexico (n = 1191)
33.6
11.4 14 10.6 15.5 14.9
04
08
0
pe
rce
nt o
f re
spo
nd
en
ts
never 1/year 1/month 1/week 1/day constantly
North Carolina (n = 217)
9.5 4.7 10.2 6.7 3.9
65.1
How often do you think about your race? Hispanic respondents, 2002 BRFSS
Racial climate
• Pertinence of “race” as a basis for classification
• Rules for “racial” classification– Number and names of categories– Sorting rules
• Opportunities and value accorded the different “racial” groups
• Affects how often you think about your “race”
020
4060
8010
0
58.8
68.573.6
64.760.2
49.5
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthnever yearly monthly weekly daily constantly
General health status, by "How often do you think about your race?"
White respondents, all six states, 2002 BRFSS (n = 21649, weighted)
020
4060
8010
0
58.8
68.573.6
64.760.2
49.5
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthnever yearly monthly weekly daily constantly
General health status, by "How often do you think about your race?"
White respondents, all six states, 2002 BRFSS (n = 21649, weighted)
15.7
8.4 8.4 9.6
15.620.4
Report fair or poor health
020
4060
8010
0
45.341.9
55.451.1
34.4 32.2
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthnever yearly monthly weekly daily constantly
General health status, by "How often do you think about your race?"
Hispanic respondents, all six states, 2002 BRFSS (n = 2619, weighted)
020
4060
8010
0
45.341.9
55.451.1
34.4 32.2
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthnever yearly monthly weekly daily constantly
General health status, by "How often do you think about your race?"
Hispanic respondents, all six states, 2002 BRFSS (n = 2619, weighted)
20.517.3
14.6 16.6
28.931.8
Report fair or poor health
020
4060
8010
0
38.9
45.8
52.5
59.8 61.2
51.9
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthnever yearly monthly weekly daily constantly
General health status, by "How often do you think about your race?"
Black respondents, all six states, 2002 BRFSS (n = 2093, weighted)
020
4060
8010
0
38.9
45.8
52.5
59.8 61.2
51.9
perc
ent
of r
espo
nden
ts
Report excellent or very good healthnever yearly monthly weekly daily constantly
General health status, by "How often do you think about your race?"
Black respondents, all six states, 2002 BRFSS (n = 2093, weighted)
28.7
18.413.7
10.6 12.1
23.4
Report fair or poor health
Question 3
[For those who are employed for wages, self-
employed, or out of work for less than one year]
Within the past 12 months at work,
do you feel you were treated worse
than, the same as, or better than
people of other races?
Question 4
Within the past 12 months when
seeking health care, do you feel
your experiences were worse than,
the same as, or better than for
people of other races?
Question 5
Within the past 30 days, have you
felt emotionally upset, for example
angry, sad, or frustrated, as a
result of how you were treated
based on your race?
Question 6
Within the past 30 days, have you
experienced any physical symptoms,
for example a headache, an upset
stomach, tensing of your muscles, or a
pounding heart, as a result of how you
were treated based on your race?
States using “Reactions to Race”
Arkansas 2004California 2002Colorado 2004Delaware 2002 2004 2005District of Columbia 2004
Florida 2002Mississippi 2004New Hampshire 2002New Mexico 2002North Carolina 2002
Ohio 2003 2005Rhode Island 2004South Carolina 2003 2004Wisconsin 2004 2005
w
ww
w
w
01
02
03
04
05
06
0
Education level
Pe
rce
nt "
fair"
or
"po
or"
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
b
bb
b
b
General health status by education, 2002 BRFSS
w
ww
w
w
01
02
03
04
05
06
0
Education level
Pe
rce
nt "
fair"
or
"po
or"
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
b
bb
b
b
02
46
81
01
2
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
Education level
Pe
rce
nt d
istr
ibu
tion
non-blackblack
General health status by education, 2002 BRFSS
w
ww
w
w
01
02
03
04
05
06
0
Education level
Pe
rce
nt "
fair"
or
"po
or"
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
h
hh
h
h
General health status by education, 2002 BRFSS
w
ww
w
w
01
02
03
04
05
06
0
Education level
Pe
rce
nt "
fair"
or
"po
or"
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
h
hh
h
h
01
02
03
04
0
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
Education level
Pe
rce
nt d
istr
ibu
tion
non-hispanichispanic
General health status by education, 2002 BRFSS
w
w
w
w
w
02
04
06
08
0
Education level
Pe
rce
nt "
exc
elle
nt"
or
"ve
ry g
oo
d"
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
bb
b
b b
General health status by education, 2002 BRFSS
w
w
w
w
w
02
04
06
08
0
Education level
Pe
rce
nt "
exc
elle
nt"
or
"ve
ry g
oo
d"
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
bb
b
b b
02
46
81
01
2
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
Education level
Pe
rce
nt d
istr
ibu
tion
non-blackblack
General health status by education, 2002 BRFSS
w
w
w
w
w
02
04
06
08
0
Education level
Pe
rce
nt "
exc
elle
nt"
or
"ve
ry g
oo
d"
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
h
h
h
h
h
General health status by education, 2002 BRFSS
w
w
w
w
w
02
04
06
08
0
Education level
Pe
rce
nt "
exc
elle
nt"
or
"ve
ry g
oo
d"
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
h
h
h
h
h0
10
20
30
40
16+ 13-15 12 9-11 K-8
Education level
Pe
rce
nt d
istr
ibu
tion
non-hispanichispanic
General health status by education, 2002 BRFSS
Measuring institutionalized racism
• Scan for evidence of “racial” disparities– Routinely monitor outcomes by “race”– “Could racism be operating here?”
• Identify mechanisms– Examine structures and written policies– Query unwritten practices and norms– “How is racism operating here?”
Policies of interest
• Policies allowing segregation of resources and risks
• Policies creating inherited group-disadvantage
• Policies favoring the differential valuation of human life by “race”
• Policies limiting self-determination
Our tasks
• Put racism on the agenda– Name racism as a force determining
the distribution of other social determinants of health
– Routinely monitor for differential exposures, opportunities, and outcomes by “race”
Our tasks
• Ask, “How is racism operating here?”– Identify mechanisms in structures,
policies, practices, and norms– Attend to both what exists and what
is lacking
Our tasks
• Organize and strategize to act– Join in grassroots organizing around
the conditions of people’s lives– Identify the structural factors creating
and perpetuating those conditions– Link with similar efforts across the
country and around the world
Resources
Levels of Racism: A Theoretic Framework and a Gardener’s Tale.Am J Public Health 2000;90(8):1212-1215.
“Race”, Racism, and the Practice of Epidemiology.Am J Epidemiol 2001;154(4):299-304.
Confronting Institutionalized Racism.Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22.
E-mail me: [email protected]