37
National Indian Health Board Exploring Tribal Public Health Accreditation Aleena M. Hernandez, MPH Red Star Innovations, LLC September 15, 2010

National Indian Health Board Exploring Tribal Public Health Accreditation Aleena M. Hernandez, MPH Red Star Innovations, LLC September 15, 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

National Indian Health Board

Exploring Tribal Public Health Accreditation

Aleena M. Hernandez, MPHRed Star Innovations, LLC

September 15, 2010

Overview• Historical Basis of Indian Health• Tribal Management of Health Programs• NIHB’s Exploring Tribal Public Health

Accreditation project• PHAB/NIHB Tribal Think Tank

• Recommendations• Next Steps

Promises to Keep: Public Health Policy for American Indians

and Alaska Natives in the 21st Century

Dixon M, Roubideaux YAmerican Public Health Association, 2001

American Indians and Alaska Natives

• 564 Federally-recognized Tribes in 35 States1

• Sovereign Nations• Distinct culture, language and traditions• Live on trust land and in urban areas• Economic Diversity• Tribal Membership

1 Indian Health Service Website www.ihs.gov

2000 Census

• AI/AN alone 2.5 million (0.9%)

• AI/AN in combination with 1.6 million one or more other races

• Total AI/AN 4.1 million (1.5%)

• Reported a specific tribal affiliation 74%• IHS Service Population 1.5 million

Historical Basis of Indian Health• Pre-Contact/Tradition Medicine• Impact of European Settlement• Constitution/Supreme Court/Treaties/Legislation

- Sovereignty- Federal Trust Responsibility- Government to Government Relationship

Significant Policy/Legislation Affecting Indian Health

1800’s – Responsibility of the War Department Indian Removal

Indian Removal Act of 1830 1836 – Medical services for land cessions

1849 - BIA/Department of Interior Dawes Act – General Allotment Act 1887

Reservation land divided into allotments Ban on traditional practices Introduction of boarding schools

Significant Policy/Legislation Affecting Indian Health

Indian Reorganization Act 1934 Termination Program of the 1950’s The Transfer Act of 1954 – Transferred health

services from the BIA to PHS 1955 - Indian Health Service established

Indian Health Service Under the US Department of Health and Human

Services Comprehensive, primary health care system and

some public health services• Only agency to provide direct medical care

Trust Responsibility: Members of federally recognized tribes

Divided into 12 Service Areas

Per Capita Health Expenditures• Indian Health Service (2005) $2,130

• Bureau of Prisons (2005 estimate) $3,986• In California and New Mexico over $4000

• Veterans Administration (2002)$4,653

• US General Population (2003) $5,670

Department of Health and Human Services, www.dhhs.gov, Source published January 2006

Tribal Management of Health Programs

The Indian Self-Determination and Educational Assistance Act 1975 P.L. 93-638

• Tribes can manage their health programs

- Title I: CONTRACT part or all of the services- Title V: COMPACT entire health programs

- Funding issues: shares, contract support costs

Putting Tribal Public Health Into Context for Accreditation

Direct service and 638 (contract/compact) tribes Geographic location (IHS Area, Rural/Urban)Landbase versus non-landbase tribes, checkerboardSingle tribe applicant versus consortium of tribesHealth Department Size Level of Public Health ActivityMulti-jurisdictional overlap and relations

National Indian Health Board

Exploring Tribal

Public Health Accreditation

Exploring Tribal Public Health Accreditation

National Indian Health Board involvement Grant: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 2008 Purpose: to assess the feasibility of the promotion

of voluntary public health accreditation and public health standards in Indian Country

Exploring Tribal Public Health Accreditation

Objectives of NIHB Project:Establish an Advisory PanelReview past accreditation efforts in Indian countryExplore/Discuss the potential for voluntary public health

accreditation in Indian countryBenefits, challenges, barriers, ideas…

Gather recommendations from Indian countryProcess, resources needed, potential partnerships

Produce a Strategic Plan

Call for Input Results Positive response to concept of public health

accreditation – broader than just health services Interest in tribes having a leadership role Opportunity to recognize the excellence in public

health across Indian Country Challenges include the diversity of public health

delivery in Indian country, time, capacity and cost to seek accreditation, multiple entities involved

Strategic Plan Recommendations Provide ongoing education/awareness to Tribes

Provide training, Technical Assistance, preparation, and readiness assessments relevant to tribal context

Consider Tribal version of Standards and Measures Explore PHAB’s role in strengthening relationships

among tribal, local, and state HDsConvene regional roundtablesFacilitate a “Tribal Think Tank” to address relations

Public Health Accreditation BoardNational Indian Health Board

Tribal Think Tank

December 16, 2009

Tucson, Arizona

TRIBAL THINK TANK

17 Participants Representing Tribal Beta Test Sites NIHB Tribal Public Health Accreditation

Advisory Board Members Tribal Health Directors/Administrators PHAB Staff/Board Members RWJF

Tribal Think Tank ObjectivesBased on NIHB Advisory Board Recommendations: Identify and discuss strategies to ensure ongoing

Tribal input into the accreditation process Identify strategies for PHAB to strengthen

Tribal/State relations in accreditation Explore the adaptation of the PHAB Public

Health Accreditation Standards and Measures to create a Tribal version

Strategies: Involving Tribes Convene local, regional and national meetings Provide outreach and education to tribes Hire/contract individuals with experience in tribal

public health systems (culturally competence) Identify opportunities for communication and

collaboration among tribal, local and state health department

Accreditation Incentives Potential to identify model Tribal Public Health Systems Opportunity to strengthen tribal public health

infrastructure Improve the quality of care Build credibility and Strengthens a tribe’s ability to advocate for health

Cost Issues – funding is needed to support tribal infrastructure development, technical assistance, and capacity building.

Tribe/State Relations

Government to Government relationshipOverlapping JurisdictionsResponsibility and AuthorityFederal transfer of responsibility and

funding for public health functions to states

Tribal Consultation

1994 – Bill Clinton introduced Tribal Consultation PolicyFacilitates formal government to government relationsRequires federal executive departments and agencies to

consult with tribes prior to making decisions that would affect them

November 2009, President Barack Obama convened all tribal leaders in Tribal Consultation

Strategies: Tribe/State Relations Conduct regional/national roundtables with tribal, local,

and state health departments Use the Beta Test to develop a “Model Partnership for

Accreditation” Provide education about tribal public health systems to

local and state health departments Utilize the accreditation process/documents to

encourage coordination and collaboration among tribal, local and state health departments

Next Steps – In Progress Conduct outreach to tribes at the regional and

national level Convene tribal, local and state health departments

to dialogue about partnership and accreditation Utilize input from the Tribal Beta Test Sites to

identify lessons learned and to inform future work Develop tribal version of the Standards, Measures

and documentation

PHAB – Tribal Standards Workgroup Conducted a call for Workgroup volunteers in July

People with knowledge and understanding of Tribal Public Health Systems

Workgroup volunteers selected in August Includes members of original Standards and Measures

Workgroup 1st Workgroup meeting to be held in conjunction with

NIHB Annual Consumer Conference Scheduled to be completed in March 2011

2010 NIHB Tribal Public Health Profile Assess readiness for public health accreditation Provide a baseline to measure growth and change in

tribal public health capacity Prioritize development and resource allocations Advocate for resources and policy on behalf of

Tribes and public health Identify technical assistance and quality

improvement needs

Tribal Standards WorkgroupTribal Representatives

Michael Allison, MPH Donald Vesper, REHS,MPH Loren Sekayumptewa, MSW Debra Smith, RN, PHN, MSN JT Petherick, JD, MPH Annette James, RN Gary Quinn, MSW Glenda Davis

Standards Development WG Jane Smilie Barbara Worgess, MPH Steve Ronk, MPH Torney Smith, MSHE

Profile Participants

Tribal Health Organizations Tribal Health Departments Indian Health Service Units (Hospitals, clinics,

and satellites) Indian Health Boards or Intertribal Councils with

Tribal Epidemiology Centers Urban Indian Health Centers

Profile Highlights: Assessment 44% conducted community health assessment in the

past 3 years 47% of Tribal Health Departments; 46% percent of

IHS Facilities: 60% Area Indian Health Boards and 74 % of Urban Indian Health Centers have data sharing agreements with state health departments

66% evaluate public health activities and/or services

Profile Highlights: Policy Development

Regulatory activities are provided primarily by the Tribal Health Departments or IHS in tribal communities

Less than 40% receive funding from their state health agency through the CDC public health preparedness cooperative agreement.

Over 40% have a research policy or ordinance for reviewing and approving health research.

Profile Highlights: Assurance

59 % serve populations that travel 50 miles or more to access their services

83% help enroll eligible individuals into public benefit programs, such as Medicaid/Medicare.

Collaborative relationships with other Tribal Health Organizations were most frequently rated effective or highly effective

Profile in Summary

Tribes are providing a wide range of public health activities across domains

Further exploration is needed to understand:Tribal public health performance Readiness for public health accreditationTechnical assistance and quality improvement needs

http://nihb.org/docs/07012010/NIHB_HealthProfile%202010.pdf

RWJF – PHSSR Grant 2010 RWJF Grant: Public Health Systems and Services Research

Partnership with Nat’l Opinion Research Center (NORC) Enhance data analysis and conduct initial comparison to state

and local health departments Gather additional qualitative data Recommend future data collection enhancements to produce a

profile for harmonization with State and Local Profiles (ASTHO and NACCHO)

Thank You

Aimee Centivany, MPH

National Indian Health Board

[email protected]

Aleena M. Hernandez, MPH

Red Star Innovations, LLC

[email protected]