13
National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card

NTOC Talks

February 23, 2005

Page 2: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card:Purpose

Determine how well the nation supports signals

Build a case for more attention and investment

Provide a benchmarking tool for agencies

Page 3: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card:Self Assessment

Self assessment – August 2004Proactive ManagementCoordinate Signal Systems Individualized Signal SystemsSpecialized OperationsDetectorsMaintenance

All responses are anonymous!

Page 4: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card:Participants

378 Responses49 states represented242 cities62 counties

Good distribution betweenPopulationSignal system size

Page 5: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card

• Overall score is low

• Management & detection scored lowest• Individual intersections scored highest• Large systems scored higher than

national

Page 6: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card:

Why such a low score?Signals turn green, yellow and redBUT,Not operating as an efficient, well-

integrated systemProactive management is limitedLimited resources spent fighting fires

Page 7: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card:Other Findings

Proactive Management68% have no documented management

plan or manage “ad hoc”

Coordinated Operations50%+ do not conduct timing reviews every

3-5 years

Page 8: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card:Other Findings

Individualized Operations75% have no documented process to

trigger timing reviews

Detectors1/3 have no regular process for collecting

data for timing

MaintenanceAgencies operate with minimum staffing

Page 9: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card:What We Learned

Nation doesn’t support signal operations wellResource limitations result in inefficient operationsAgencies manage signals by fighting firesSmall investments have big benefits (40:1 B/C)We can do better!

Page 10: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card:More Resources Needed

Signal Hardware - $265m/yearTiming Updates - $200m/yearMaintenance - $500m/yearTotal - $965m/year

$104B/year spent on highway transportation

99%

1%

Total Highway $ Traffic Signals

Page 11: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card

If we had the resources for a high score

Delay would decrease by 15-20%Travel time would reduce up to 25%Emissions would reduce up to 22%Fuel consumption would reduce up to

10%

Page 12: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card

Next StepsPresentation of results at ITE Technical

ConferenceScores sent to participantsPress packages sent to participantsPublicize to all practitionersReport released to participantsConduct national press event (mid

April)

Page 13: National Traffic Signal Report Card NTOC Talks February 23, 2005

National Traffic Signal Report Card

What you can doReview your scoreTalk with your agency’s PIOPrepare for the National Press EventConduct a local press event

What to do if you didn’t participateComplete the self assessment now (

www.ite.org)Baseline against the national scoreConduct a local press event