Natural Riparian Resources

  • Upload
    chacha

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Natural Riparian Resources. Water. Vegetation. Landscape & Soil. Standard Checklist (lotic). Riparian/Wetland Vegetation Groups. Stabilizers Colonizers Increasers/Invaders. Stabilizer Species. Stabilizer group. Establish along streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, springs, & seeps - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Natural Riparian ResourcesLandscape & SoilWaterVegetation

  • Standard Checklist (lotic)

    Yes

    No

    N/A

    VEGETATION

    6) There is diverse age-class distribution of riparian-wetland vegetation (recruitment for maintenance/recovery)

    Rationale:

    7) There is diverse composition of riparian-wetland vegetation (for maintenance/recovery)

    Rationale:

    8) Species present indicate maintenance of riparian-wetland soil moisture characteristics

    Rationale:

    9) Streambank vegetation is comprised of those plants or plant communities that have root masses capable of withstanding high streamflow events

    Rationale:

    10) Riparian-wetland plants exhibit high vigor

    Rationale

    11) Adequate vegetative cover present to protect banks and dissipate energy during high flows

    Rationale:

    12) Plant communities are an adequate source of coarse and/or large woody material (for maintenance/recovery)

    Rationale:

  • Riparian/Wetland Vegetation GroupsStabilizersColonizersIncreasers/Invaders

  • Stabilizer Species

  • Stabilizer groupEstablish along streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, springs, & seepsStrong, fibrous, deep root systemRhizomatousProvide protection against waters energy

  • Sedges (Carex)Leaves 3-rankedStem TriangularSolidSedges have edges

  • Beaked Sedge(Carex utriculata)Formerly(Carex rostrata)

  • Nebraska sedge(Carex nebarasensis)Emery Creek

  • Rushes (Juncus)Rushes are RoundSolid and Round or CompressedLeaves Alternate or2-Ranked

  • Baltic Rush or Wire Grass(Juncus balticus)

  • Wire Grass Roots

  • True GrassesLeaves 2-rankedStem HollowWithNodes and Intenodes

  • Fowl Manna Grass(Glyceria striata)Blue Joint Reedgrass(Calamagrostis canadensis)

  • Reeds Canarygrass(Phlaris arundicanacea)Little Wood River

  • Woody Species (Willow, Alder, Birch, etc.)

  • Willow Roots

  • Alder

  • Dogwood

    Red osier dogwood

  • ColonizersFirst to establish freshly deposited soilshallow open waterbarren areasRoot systemsstoloniferous or rhizomatousshallow and relatively weakCritical to recovery

  • Brook GrassSpike Rush

  • Short-awned Foxtail

  • Water-cress(Rorippa naturtium-aquaticum)

  • Coyote (Sand Bar) Willow (Salix exigua)Teton River

  • Cottonwood(Populus spp.)South Fork Snake River

  • Increasers/InvadersTolerant of heavy grazingIncrease with heavy grazing Low growing pointsShallow, less massive root systemsLess protective of streambanks against waters energyNoxious weeds

  • Kentucky Bluegrass and Red Top(Poa prentensis and Agrostis stolonifera) East Fork Castle Creek

  • Leafy SpurgePurple Loosestrife

  • 6) There is diverse age-class distribution of riparian-wetland vegetation (recruitment for maintenance/recovery)Multiple age-classes usually indicate that riparian-wetland areas can recover or maintain themselvesAt least 2 age-classes should be presentOne of the age-class should be youngOlder age classes can persist in degraded conditonsThis is presence/absence question, not an amount

  • Are there two or more age classes of stabilizer riparian/wetland species present within the riparian area?

  • Are there two or more age classes of stabilizer riparian/wetland species present within the riparian area?

  • Are there two or more age classes of stabilizer riparian/wetland species present within the riparian area?

  • 7) There is diverse composition of riparian-wetland vegetation (for maintenance/recovery)Diverse composition of riparian-wetland vegetation allows for recovery and maintenaceThis is a presence/absence question not amountAt least stabilizing species present

  • Are there at least two stabilizer riparian/wetland species present within the riparian area?

  • Are there at least two stabilizer riparian/wetland species present within the riparian area?

  • Are there at least two stabilizer riparian/wetland species present within the riparian area?

  • 8) Species present indicate maintenance of riparian soil moisture characteristics Indicators that water table level is being maintained or raisedIncised ChannelAggrading ChannelRiparian VegetationObligate Wetland (OBL) > 99%Facultative Wetland (FACW) 67% to 99%Facultative (FAC) 34% to 66%Upland VegetationFacultative Upland (FACU) 67% to 99%Obligate Upland(UPL)> 99%

  • Are stabilizing riparian/wetland species regenerating? Are upland species encroaching into the riparian/wetland area? Has the channel incised leaving remnant riparian/wetland vegetation on the terrace? Is there a water source independent of the stream? (Refer to Question 4)

  • Are stabilizing riparian/wetland species regenerating? Are upland species encroaching into the riparian/wetland area? Has the channel incised leaving remnant riparian/wetland vegetation on the terrace? Is there a water source independent of the stream? (Refer to Question 4)

  • Are stabilizing riparian/wetland species regenerating? Are upland species encroaching into the riparian/wetland area? Has the channel incised leaving remnant riparian/wetland vegetation on the terrace? Is there a water source independent of the stream? (Refer to Question 4)

  • 9) Streambank vegetation is comprised of those plants or plant communities that have root masses capable of withstanding high stream flow eventsStreambank VegetationStreambank is the part of the channel between bankfull and the streambedNot a quantity questionPresence or absenceObligate wetland or facultative wetland plantsVegetation must be directly effecting the streambank.

  • Streambank

  • Are there stabilizing riparian species or riparian communities on the streambank?

  • Are there stabilizing riparian species or riparian communities on the streambank?

  • 10) Riparian-wetland plants exhibit high vigorDetermine if plants are healthy and robustSufficient leaf area for adequate food productionTo actively reproducedGrow strong deep root systems

  • Plant Vigor-Leaves and RootsCaring for the Green Zone, Riparian Areas and Grazing ManagementAlberta Riparian Habitat Management Project, Cows and Fish Project

  • Winward, 2000

  • Are the herbaceous stabilizer (late seral) species obvious individual plants? Are there new stabilizing herbaceous plants around the perimeter of the mat? Are leaf blades of the sedges relatively wide?

  • Are the herbaceous stabilizer (late seral) species obvious individual plants? Are there new stabilizing herbaceous plants around the perimeter of the mat? Are leaf blades of the sedges relatively wide? Are non-rhizomatous woody species short with over 10 stems at the base? Do woody specie have a club look, multiple branching, at the end of the stems?

  • Are the herbaceous stabilizer (late seral) species obvious individual plants? Are there new stabilizing herbaceous plants around the perimeter of the mat? Are leaf blades of the sedges relatively wide? Are non-rhizomatous woody species short with over 10 stems at the base? Do woody specie have a club look, multiple branching, at the end of the stems?

  • Are the herbaceous stabilizer (late seral) species obvious individual plants? Are there new stabilizing herbaceous plants around the perimeter of the mat? Are leaf blades of the sedges relatively wide? Are non-rhizomatous woody species short with over 10 stems at the base? Do woody specie have a club look, multiple branching, at the end of the stems?

  • 11) Adequate riparian-wetland vegetative cover present to protect banks and dissipate energy during high flowsAdequate amount of vegetation along streambanks and floodplainDissipate energyPrevent erosionFilter sediment, etc.

  • Root LengthManning, M.E., et al, 1989

  • Channel Stability Rating (Vegetation)Winward 2000Appendix BAdequate Root Strength

  • Key to Greenline Riparian Capability Groups (Winword 2000)Percent gradient and substrate classes modified from Rosgen (1996).Abbreviations Used:

    Sl ......................Silt ...............................250 mm ......................>9.8 inConsol. ...........Consolidated MaterialNon-Consol. ..Non-Consolidated Material

    (Co Consolidated material refers to situations where at least one major soil horizon with within the root rooting zone consists of strongly compacted, cohesive, or Ce cemented particles.Values in parentheses refer to percent of the greenline that should be represented by late seral community types or anchored rocks/logs when riparian areas fitting each capability group are functioning properly.USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-47. 2000

  • Are the streambanks covered with sufficient stabilizing species to protect it from them from erosion (See Winward 2000, p34)? Is the stabilizing riparian vegetation adequate on the floodplain? Are the stabilizing species vigorous (see question 10)?8 Mile Creek

  • Are the streambanks covered with sufficient stabilizing species to protect it from them from erosion (See Winward 2000, p34)? Is the stabilizing riparian vegetation adequate on the floodplain? Are the stabilizing species vigorous (see question 10)?

  • 12 - Plant communities are an adequate source of coarse and/or large woody material (for maintenance/recovery)Source of coarse or large woody material dissipate energy, trap sediment, build floodplainsSufficiently large to act as a hydrologic modifierCoarse wood 4inches X 4 feet and achoredLarge wood 12 inches X 4 ftRangeland streams without aspen, cottonwood, etc. usually does not require large wood

  • Is the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? Is large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? Is the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? Has the site had the trees removed from the site? Are there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel?

  • Is the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? Is large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? Is the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? Has the site had the trees removed from the site? Are there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel?

  • Is the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? Is large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? Is the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? Has the site had the trees removed from the site? Are there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel?

  • Is the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? Is large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? Is the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? Has the site had the trees removed from the site? Are there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel?

  • Is the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? Is large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? Is the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? Has the site had the trees removed from the site? Are there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel?

  • Natural Riparian ResourcesVegetationLandscape/SoilWater

    Vegetation is the second leg of the triangle. It is provides the rebar for the streambanks with deep strong root system. It provides protection to the soil surface with the leaves and stems. It helps filter sediment and build banks. There are seven questions that pertain directly vegetation. Questions 6 and 10 are important as to the relative health of the important riparian plants. Questions 7 through 9 are not an amount rather they are presents or absence. Question 11 is the amount.At this point, we need to discuss riparian-wetland vegetation and some of the functional groups. For our purposes today, we will group the riparian plants into three groups, colonizers, stabilizers, and increasers/Invaders. The definitions for colonizers and stabilizers are from Dr. Alma Winward, US Forest Service, Ogden, Utah. Increasers/invaders were added because these species are important indicators of current riparian conditions.Grasslike Plants

    Beaked sedge (Carex rostrata), is one of the most common stabilizer plants in riparian areas at mid to low elevations in Idaho. It is very aggressive if given an opportunity and provides a large amount of forage.

    Beaked sedge develops a continuous buffer for water energy along Upper Portnuef River. By the way, sedges have triangular stems. I learned it by "sedges have edges."

    Wire grass or baltic rush (Juncus balticus) the dark areas on the slide is a common riparian plants. It will help stabilize with an extensive and strong root system, but also will thrive in a little drier conditions. Baltic rush in the darker colored plants in this picture.

    Wire grass or baltic rush again has extensive root that are hard to dig up. Rushes have round stems. I learned the saying "rushes are round." Here we have an example of the extensive root system under baltic rush. Note the amount, depth, and size of the roots.Stabilizers

    Plant species that become established along the waters edges of streams, rivers, ponds, and lakes. They also become established at springs and seeps where ground water provides the necessary wet conditions. Some can persist in drier conditions once they are established. These plants commonly have strong, cord-like rhizomes and deep fibrous root masses. The root masses along with the typically coarse leaves and strong crowns are able to protect streambanks from the erosive forces of water. These same characteristics filter sediment and with the forces of water build or rebuild eroded portions of streambanks. They also are important to improving water quality. These species play an important role in properly functioning riparian areas and aquatic ecosystems

    Many of the important riparian stabilizing species are not true grasses. They area classified as grass-likes that include the sedges and rushes.

    This chart provides an indication of the amount of above ground biomass to the below ground. Riparian vegetation has a root to shoot ratio of over 3 to 1. Meaning that there is more than three times as much growing vegetative material below ground as there is above. This is compared to the dry or upland site which has a ratio of about 1.5 to 1. Here we can see a comparison of the wet, moist, and dry plants root system. At all levels, there is almost two times as much root mass as the moist and dry plants. The sedges (Carex) are one of the important riparian species. They are characterized by solid triangular stems with leaves that are 3-ranked or come of the stem on three sides. The leaves are usually relatively wide. As a result, I learned that sedges have edges.

    These are some of the common growth characteristics of sedges. The sedges we will discuss usually have well distributed leaves. The seeds are usually distributed along the stem also.

    The stabilizers have rhizomes or underground stems that produce new plants. We will discuss four species common to much of Idaho. In reality it is not iThis picture is of beaked sedge, a common sedge in the mid elevations. Note the wide leaves and the seed heads distributed along the stems.

    This is a typical growth location in very wet soils along the stream and in low places where the water table is very shallow.

    Nebraska sedge (Carex nebraskensis), is one of the most common stabilizer plants in riparian areas at mid to low elevations in Idaho. It is very aggressive if given an opportunity and provides a large amount of forage.

    Nebraska sedge develops a continuous buffer for water energy along Birch Creek. It is the bluish colored plant. By the way, sedges have triangular stems. I learned it by "sedges have edges."

    Rushes or wire grass has a solid or compressed stem that appears to be solid. The leaves are compressed or two-ranked. As I learned it Rushes are round. So now we have sedges with edges and rushes are round.

    There are various growth forms, but we are interested in the rhizomatous plants the develop course deep roots, such as baltic rush.This is wire grass or Baltic rush. It is usually a less preferred feed by livestock, but it is very effective in erosion control on streambanks.

    This is a typical growth pattern. Rushes usually grow in slightly drier sights than sedges. Although it is not uncommon for them to grow on the streambank. Especially in a recovering stream. In saturated conditions, sedges will gradually replace the rushes.Here we have an example of the extensive root system under baltic rush. Note the amount, depth, and size of the roots.

    There are a few true grasses that are important streambank stabilizers. They are are different from the grass-like plants we just discussed in that the leaves are two ranked and the stems are hollow. The stems also have nodes (joints) and space between the nodes called internodes.

    The stabilizing species we will discuss are whose with rhizomes.Fowl mannagrass (Glyceria striata) shown here is one of the stabilizing grasses. Mannagrass stabilizes rapidly as shown in this slide on Crow Creek. It develops a dense root system and a good greenline. Here the mannagrass is growing in recently high water deposition.

    Blue joint reedgrass (Calamagrostis canadensis) is a native species that has a deep tough fibruousroot system that stabilizes streambanks. This is an example of a reedgrass community on Little Sand Creek in northern Idaho.

    Another stabilizer is Reeds canarygrass (Phlaris arundicinacea). There is disagreement as to whether it is a native or introduced species. It has been used as a pasture grass in the past. Although it is effective for streambank stabilization and very aggressive, it can become a weed problem along many waterways. Woody Species

    Willow, alder and birch are typical woody communities that provides an extensive and tough root systems. They provide excellent streambank stability. Willow communities most frequently occur on coarser textured soils. They stabilize streams and filter sediment making condition for herbaceous plants.

    Geyers willow (Salix geyeriana) in combination with sedges make the highest protection possible by vegetation. On low gradient systems, herbaceous species can provide adequate protection. Many riparian areas have several species of willow in them.

    Willow roots are very deep (six feet plus) and strong. It protects the banks and dissipates water energy. Some like to say that coarse willow roots act as rebar.

    Some common woody species include willow, alder, birch, and dogwood.Colonizers

    Colonizers or pioneers are plant species that establish in freshly deposited soil or they may establish in the shallow open, barren areas and are often the first plants to occupy open sites. They can establish along the edge of a stream in slow moving fringes along a stream or pond. They are usually rhizomatous or stoloniferous with shallow roots and relatively weak stems. Although some of the plants are short lived, they grow very rapidly, up to an inch and a half per day. Their root systems catch fine sediment and hold it in place so the more permanent stabilizer species can replace them. It is part of the streambank building process. Another apparent function of colonizers is to narrow the channel during low flows allowing sufficient current to keep sediment moving through the channel. These plants play a critical role in the recovery and maintenance of stream channels.

    Some common colonizers are:

    Brookgrass (Catabrosia aquatica) a very shallow rooted rapid growing (up to 1 inches per day) colonizer. It traps sediment and provides habitat for stabilizers in which to establish roots. This grass will also establish in good condition streams at low water, narrowing the channel even more, allow sediment to be flushed through the system. The grass is usually removed during high flow events.

    At lower elevations, common spike rush (Eleocharis palustris)) is a common colonizer. It establishes along the stream margin in slow water and filters sediment. Spike rush is more permanent than some of the other colonizers with moderately strong root systems and are more difficult for stabilizers to move into. Here on Shoshone Creek spike rush has narrowed the stream. If Nebraska sedge is established, the rhizomes will penetrate the spike rush and very slowly replace it. On Hardtrigger Creek the spike rush is the dominant vegetation in the early stages of recovery, but can withstand high flow events.

    Water foxtail (alopecurus geniculatus) a colonizer of fine sediment. It can be found along the shallows and still water along streams. It is a tufted grass, without rhizomes. Thus, it only begins to prepare the site for stabilizer species. It is common from mid elevations up.Water-cress (Rorippa naturtium-aquaticum) is a broadleaf plant that most of are familiar with. Again it will establish along the stream margin in shallow water and can go into the stream. It collects fine sediment and narrows the stream in low flow and allow much sediment to pass through the system. It provides hiding cover for fish.Coyote or sandbar willow (Salix exigua) usually starts in gravel or sandy soils. It has a wide spread shallow root system that sends up shoot, thus does not form a clump. It will form very dense colonies which is unique among willows in Idaho. It filters sediment and provides habitat for other stabilizers.

    Another colonizer is cottonwood (Populus spp.). It must have damp freshly deposited soil for the seed to germinate and establish. Here on the South Fork Snake River which has a regulated flow, age classes show a several years differences. Only after the floods in 1997, cottonwoods sprouted and became established along the South Fork Snake River after the 1997 floods. You can also see the linear patterns showing the bare ground habitat associated with flood deposition.

    Increasers/Invaders

    Increasers are plants species that are more tolerant of disturbance or heavy grazing. Plant communities in many of our riparian areas have species that fit into this group.

    Increasers and invaders have shorter, shallower, and less massive root systems. Thus, they have less ability to protect streambanks, dissipate energy, and filter sediment. They usually produce few pounds of forage, although Kentucky bluegrass is very palatable.

    Invaders are plant species that invades or rapidly increases following disturbance or heavy grazing or noxious weeds may invade any plant community.

    Examples of increasers and invaders include:

    Two common increasers are Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and red top (Agrostis stolonifera). Both are shallow rooted rhizomatous sod forming grasses. They are very palatable for livestock and tolerates grazing. They are poor streambank stabilizers, will dominate drier sites and with proper management, stabilizers will replace much of the Kentucky bluegrass.

    Other common increasers/invaders include fox tail (Hordeum jubatum), Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), and Woods rose (Rosa woodsii). Other common increasers/invaders include fox tail (Hordeum jubatum), Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), and Woods rose (Rosa woodsii).

    Noxious Weeds

    Noxious weeds are a concern riparian areas. Disturbed area without dense, deep rooted plants provide an area for weeds to germinate. Because of potential water contamination, there is only a limited number of chemicals that can be used. Here leafy spurge is invading a riparian community.

    Purple loosestrife shown invade disturbed areas and are very difficult to control. Healthy riparian vegetation can help control, probably not eradicate, many of the these species. Noxious weeds should be addressed in each riparian or allotment management plan.

    Question 6 - There is diverse age-class distribution of riparian-wetland vegetation (recruitment for maintenance and recovery)

    Purpose

    For a riparian-wetland area to recover or maintain itself, it has to have more than one age class of riparian-wetland plants. This question is not asking whether all possible age classes are present; it is asking whether the number of age classes that provide recruitment for maintenance of an area or to allow an area to recover are present. Most riparian-wetland areas will recover or maintain themselves with two age classes, as long as one of the age classes is young (recruitment) and the other is middle-aged (replacement). Older age classes (mature) usually take care of themselves, as they are well-attached to existing water tables. Older age classes can persist even with degraded conditions.

    Examples

    For riparian-wetland areas that require woody vegetation to achieve functionality, a yes answer would be given if there are seedlings and saplings present on the reach being assessed. A no answer would be given if either recruitment or replacement age-classes are absent.

    Here Castle Creek has only a single age diversity of riparian vegetation. The answer would be no

    Answering question 6 for riparian-wetland areas that only need herbaceous vegetation to achieve functionality is a little more difficult. Many plants expand or colonize a site by stem and root extension (e.g. Nebraska sedge). If there is dense matting of herbaceous plants the answer to question 6 would be yes. If there are individual plants of Nebraska sedge scattered along a reach being assessed, the answer to question 6 would be no. The same can be said for questions 7-11.

    Many riparian-wetland areas have potential for both woody and herbaceous vegetation. If a combination of woody and herbaceous, either young, and/or middle aged, plants are present the answer to question 6 would be yes.

    It is important to note that this question if for evaluating diverse age class for riparian-wetland vegetation, not for upland vegetation. For example, if an area being assessed contains six age vegetation, not for upland. For example, if a area being assessed contains six age-classes of upland plants, the answer to question 6 would be "no." The same can be said for questions 7-11.

    An "N/A" answer would apply for channels that are entrenched and confined in bedrock (e.g. Al channel type-Rosgen 1996).This picture shows at least two age-classes of willows.This slide of Shoshone Creek shows multiple age-classes of willow and a continuous mat of sedges indicating reproduction and Question 7-There is diverse composition of riparian-wetland vegetation (for maintenance/recovery)

    Purpose

    Not only does a riparian-wetland area require a diverse age class, it has to have a diverse composition of vegetation present if is going to maintain itself or recover. This question is not asking whether all the plants that an area can support are present.

    The intent of question 7 is to document that species composition present is sufficient for maintenance or recovery. For most riparian-wetland areas, this means having two or more riparian-wetland species present, depending on site potential and/or capability. The presence of only one species makes a site very vulnerable to disease or extreme changes in climate, which may result in degradation of an area. There are some areas, though, that will have only one species, but these are uncommon and usually limited as a result of a unique soil property, vegetative characteristics, or water regime.

    Examples

    Areas such as shown in this slide of Cedar Creek shows the diverse vegetation on a healthy riparian area. This is typical of healthy riparian-wetland areas. We can see rushes, sedges, at least two kinds of willows and aspen.

    There are no stabilizing species in this picture. The tall plants are annual forbs.Here there is willow, sedge, and fowl manna grass.Here there is 3 or 4 species of willow, at least two species of sedges, and rush. A healthy riparian area.Question 8 - Species present indicate 'maintenance of riparian-wetland soil moisture characteristics

    Purpose

    The intent of this question is to look for evidence that the water table level is being maintained or is moving towards its potential extent as indicated by the presence of riparian-wetland vegetation. Recovering an existing water table is vital to the maintenance or recovery of a riparian-wetland area.

    Riparian-wetland plants are divided into categories relative to their likelihood to occur in wetlands or nonwetlands (e.g., Reed 1988). These categories are Obligate Wetland (OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW), Facultative (FAC), Facultative Upland (FACU), and Obligate Upland (UPL). Obligate wetland and Facultative wetland plants are usually indicators of maintaining the water table. Facultative plants are not good indicators and facultative upland and obligate upland plants would indicate a lowering of the water table.

    Plants that occur in wetlands are hydrophytes, and they have contact with the water table, which is why they can be used as indicators of soil moisture characteristics.

    Species present indicate the level of the water table is being maintained. This example of riparian vegetation along Emery Creek. Riparian-wetland species include sedges, rushes, and willows. Notice the sagebrush, an obligate upland plant, is dying near the stream, an indication the riparian area is maintaining or raising its level.

    The deed incision will lower the water table. The willows in the background have a deep root system and may live for many years, but will not reproduce under these conditions. The current water table is associated with the stream and on the terrace or upper level. Be sure to recognize the appropriate level for the water table under the current climate and geomorphic features.Question 9 - Streambank vegetation is comprised of those plants or plant communities that have root masses capable of withstanding high streamflow events

    Purpose

    The intent of question 9 is to document that the right plants or community types are present on the streambanks for recovery and maintenance of the riparian-wetland area.

    Streambanks dominated by vegetation that lacks extensive root masses are undercut during high flow events and collapse. This collapse results m a change in the active channels width/depth ratio, gradient, and sinuosity, which reduces a riparian-wetland areas ability to dissipate energy. Most plants that are OBL and FACW have root masses capable of withstanding high-flow events, while most plants that are FACU or UPL do not.

    The streambank is the area between bankfull and the channel bottom. The terrace wall is the area above the floodplain. Examples

    Riparian-wetland species, such as willow, alder, aspen, birch, and cottonwood, and or deep- rooted herbaceous species, such as sedges, rushes, bulrush, and some wetland grasses, have root masses along the streambank capable of withstanding high flow events. If the plants dominate plant communities along a streambank, the answer to question 9 would be yes. An exception would be for intermittent systems. For many intermittent systems the community domination of FAC plants is all that is required for a "yes" answer, as this is all these systems can produce.

    Here, on Castle Creek there is a dominance of Kentucky bluegrass, there are sedges and willow along the stream that do not provide the streambank protecting measures of the riparian species, the answer is Yes, because there are willow and Nebraska sedge, very low vigor, along the streambank.

    Some species, such as Kentucky bluegrass, redtop, blue grama, and sagebrush, do not have the root masses capable of withstanding high-flow events. If these plants dominate plant communities along a streambank, the answer to question 9 would be "no."

    There are exceptions, such as high gradient, bedrock, or boulder/cobble stream types (Rosgen 1996), where the vegetation community contributes little, if any, to bank stability. For these the answer would be "N/A."

    The bank is eroding or has only Kentucky bluegrass or redtop along the streambank. The answer is no.PurposeThe intent of this question is to ascertain if riparian-wetland plants are healthy and robust or weaken/stressed and leaving the area. The above ground expression is reflection of the below-ground and ability for riparian-wetland species to hold the area together. As riparian-wetland plants weaken or leave an area, the is subject to degradation.This slide shows the difference in the root growth associated with vigor of the above ground part of the plant. On the far left, the plant has been continually clipped to a short height, may be one inch. Not that the individual plants are obvious with little root growth. Other characteristics of low vigor in sedges are relatively narrow leaves, individual plants are distinct with leaves growing close to the ground. It take adequate leaves above the ground to maintain a strong healthy root system.If we look at a cross-section of the stream, this is where we would find the greatest water velocity. As you can see, this is the area of greatest root concentration of the stabilizing species. Shallow rooted species allow the water to use its energy on the soil underneath the vegetation.This question is very important, but is difficult to answer. For most riparian-wetland areas, plant size, shape, and leaf color during the growing season can be used to discern vigor. For example, if the willows for a given reach are well-rounded and robust, the answer to question 10 would be "yes." If these same plants are highlined/mushroom- shaped, contain a lot of decadent material, etc., the answer to question 10 would be "no.

    Another example of a "no" answer would be if the willow leaves are turning yellow during the growing season. This usually happens as a result of water being removed or added to a system, which stresses the plants. However, change in color can also indicate a disease problem or climatic factors.

    Abundance of herbaceous plants can be used to assess vigor. If Nebraska sedge composes a dense mat on the reach being assessed, the answer to question 10 would be "yes." If Nebraska sedge occurs as isolated plants or broken clumps not forming communities, the answer to question 10 would be "no."

    "N/A" would be used for channel types that have no potential to produce vegetation.

    Are the herbaceous stabilizer (late seral) species obvious individual plants? Yes Are there new stabilizing herbaceous plants around the perimeter of the mat? NoAre leaf blades of the sedges relatively wide? NoAre non-rhizomatous woody species short with over 10 stems at the base? Do woody specie have a club look, multiple branching, at the end of the stems?Are the herbaceous stabilizer (late seral) species obvious individual plants? Are there new stabilizing herbaceous plants around the perimeter of the mat? Are leaf blades of the sedges relatively wide? Are non-rhizomatous woody species short with over 10 stems at the base? Do woody specie have a club look, multiple branching, at the end of the stems?

    Shrubs show severe hedging and very little growth. Herbaceous riparian vegetion is sparce with narrow leaves and individual plants instead of wide leaves and dense mat.

    Are the herbaceous stabilizer (late seral) species obvious individual plants? Are there new stabilizing herbaceous plants around the perimeter of the mat? Are leaf blades of the sedges relatively wide? Are non-rhizomatous woody species short with over 10 stems at the base? Do woody specie have a club look, multiple branching, at the end of the stems?Question 11 - Adequate riparian-wetland vegetation cover is present to protect banks and dissipate energy during high flows

    Purpose

    Vegetation filters sediment, aids floodplain development, protects streambanks, etc., all of which dissipate stream energies associated with high flow events. But this can only happen if there are enough plants. The purpose of this question is to determine if there is an adequate amount of vegetation present to dissipate stream energies from high flow events.

    This question is crucial for areas where vegetation is required for proper functioning. For a riparian-wetland area to recover, composition of the right plants, recruitment, etc., are necessary, but until the right amount is present, the riparian-wetland area will not cross the threshold that would allow it to function properly.

    It is important to understand that question Il deals with an amount, while questions 6-10 deal with composition, age class, etc., not amount. Generally question 11 will be answered no if one or more of the other vegetation questions are answered no.

    Riparian plants are the glue or resin that holds streambanks together. They very strong and can resist the forces of water. This maintains productive and diverse plant species that provide for the many values that we have learned the riparian areas provide.

    Mary Manning in a Masters research project provides some indication of the mount of roots under some sedges, grass, and rush. Note the miles of roots in a cube 12"X12"X16" under Nebraska sedge, baltic rush, Douglas sedge, and Nevada bluegrass. Nebraska sedge has about 22 miles compared with baltic rush with about 8 miles. Douglas sedge, that is similar to Kentucky bluegrass (Mary Manning, Personal communications) is about 6 miles. The difference between Douglas sedge and Baltic rush is the baltic rush as much coarser roots with fewer fine roots.

    Although the length of the roots under Baltic Rush appears much less (Root Mass Graph), when the roots were weighed, there is not the disparity between baltic rush and Nebraska sedge. This shows that the roots are larger with fewer fine roots. As a result, this is one of the stabilizing species.Dr. Alma Winward has developed a list of riparian communities and their relative root strength or their ability to withstand water energy. The scale is from 1 to 10, with one being bare ground and 10 being anchored rock. You can see the strength of willow/sedge communities compared to Kentucky bluegrass or even willow/Kentucky bluegrass.Dr. Winward developed capability groups that can give you a good idea of the amount of riparian wetland vegetation cover needed to adequately protect a stream. It is based on the slope and streambank material type. One of the handouts provide this information.

    First determine the stream gradient or slope and second the streambank material. For example, the stream gradient is between 2 and 4 percent gradient with non-consolidated silt, sand or clay is group VI. This indicates an need for at least 80% of the streambank covered with vigorous riparian-wetland vegetation, coble, rock, or anchored coarse or large wood.Are the streambanks covered with sufficient stabilizing species to protect it from them from erosion (See Winward 2000, p34)? Is the stabilizing riparian vegetation adequate on the floodplain? Are the stabilizing species vigorous (see question 10)?

    For a wide, flat valley bottom with a sinuous channel, 90 to 95 percent cover of streambanks within a reach may be required. If an area has the appropriate percent cover of riparian-wetland plants, the answer to question 11 would be "yes." For other valley bottom types, stream types, with different site potential a streambank may only need 80 percent cover for the answer to be "yes."

    Streambank vegetation such as this sedge and willow provide adequate cover for streambank protection. These this community provides the toughest root system of any riparian plant community.

    Inadequate cover of deep rooted riparian plants leads to streambank erosion. Kentucky bluegrass and other plants with relatively shallow root systems do not afford protection to the streambank.

    Are the streambanks covered with sufficient stabilizing species to protect it from them from erosion (See Winward 2000, p34)? Is the stabilizing riparian vegetation adequate on the floodplain? Are the stabilizing species vigorous (see question 10)?

    Here we can see the lack of stabilizing vegetation and the effects of livestock use making false banks that are susceptible to damage by high stream flows.

    If a streambank for a reach being assessed is dominated by upland plants, the answer to question 11 would be "no." If this same streambank is 50 percent riparian-wetland plants and 50 percent upland plants, the answer to question 11 would still be "no."

    N/A" would be used for channel types that do not need vegetation to achieve PFC.

    Question 12 - Plant communities are an adequate source of coarse and/or large woody material (for maintenance/recovery)PurposeStream side and upland vegetation produces the size of woody material over time to capture bedload, aid floodplain development, and dissipate energy where appropriate for stream size and ecological setting where woody material is required. Without course and/or large wood, these areas cannot handle normal high_flow events because of their intensity. This wood has to be large enough to stay for a period of time to operate as a hydrologic modifier. This is usually at least 4 inches in diameter and 4 feet long. Willow, alder, and birch are not usually considered coarse wood.

    Before answering question 12, it has to be determined if large wood in necessary for a given area to function properly. Many rangeland and meadow riparian-wetland areas do not require woody material to maintain channel stability.

    Is the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? YesIs large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? Yes Is the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? Yes Has the site had the trees removed from the site? NoAre there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel? YesIs the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? Is large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? Yes Is the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? NoHas the site had the trees removed from the site? YesAre there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel? No Is the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? Yes, CedarIs large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? YesIs the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? NoHas the site had the trees removed from the site? YesAre there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel? No

    This would be a no.

    Example

    If course and/or large woody material is necessary and there are trees present, it is important to then ascertain if they are sufficient in number and size. If a reach contains a adequate number of mature trees and they are large enough to serve as hydrologic modifiers, the answer to question 12 would be "yes."

    Some streams like Big Sand Creek in northern Idaho require large wood to help dissipate energy.

    If a stream reach requires large wood and there are no living mature trees present that will access the stream in the future, then the answer to question 12 would be "no." If there is only an isolated tree here and there, the answer to question 12 would still be "no."

    This question will be answered N/A" for many channel types throughout the West, as course and/or large wood is not required for the stream to dissipate energy and to function properly.

    Is the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? Yes, Cottonwood, conifersIs large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? YesIs the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? NoHas the site had the trees removed from the site? YesAre there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel? No

    No to this questionIs the reach capable of growing trees, e.g. cottonwood, aspen and conifers? NoIs large or coarse debris a necessary hydrologic controls? NoIs the site dominated by stabilizing shrub species? Shrubs and HerbaceousHas the site had the trees removed from the site? Are there trees growing within one tree height of the stream channel?

    Not applicableWe have talked about vegetation and water. Now we will talk about the landscape and soils. Again, the stool needs all three legs in the proper length to fully support the load. If one leg is damaged, it can fail and cause a sudden letdown. Thus it takes all three parts to maintain healthy, functioning, and productive systems.