23
1 SAME NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs 17 March 2020 David Curfman, P.E. Chief Engineer, and Assistant Commander for Capital Improvements Naval Facilities Engineering Command

NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

1

SAME

NAVFAC Design and Construction

Programs

17 March 2020

David Curfman, P.E.

Chief Engineer, and

Assistant Commander for Capital Improvements

Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Page 2: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

2

Over 100 Points of DeliveryLocalized Engineering, Facility Services, and Contracting

2

Page 3: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

3

Worldwide Reach…• 100+ Points of delivery at Navy, USMC, and AF bases on five continents

• 22,000+ acquisition and sustainment professionals worldwide

• Global contracting capability for contingency construction, Base Operating Support (BOS), and related support across a

range of military operations (ROMO)

Mission: The Naval Shore Facilities, Base Operating Support, and Expeditionary Engineering

Systems Command that delivers life-cycle technical and acquisition solutions aligned to Navy and

Marine Corps priorities

…Stakeholder-Focused Approach • PRIDU, ADDU, and dedicated support

• Combatant Commanders, Fleets, CNIC,

MCICOM, State Dept, USAF, DHA, DLA etc.

• $1.1 Billion in mission funds execute $13

Billion in stakeholder funds

NAVFAC Enables Naval Forces

3

Page 4: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

4

National Security and Naval Strategies

Guide NAVFAC’s Strategic Design

NAVFAC Strategic Design 2.0

Navy

Marine Corps

Strategic Guidance

4

Page 5: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

5

NAVFAC Strategic Focus

6 FOCUS AREASDISTRIBUTED

MARITIMEOPERATIONS

3 LINES OF EFFORT

INFRASTRUCTURECAPABILITY

FINANCIALINTEGRITY

Enable Warfighter Lethality

PRODUCT AND SERVICE

PERFORMANCE

WORKFORCETALENT

ANALYTICALDECISION MAKING

13 Goals, 37 Initiatives

Q U A L I T Y S P E E D A G I L I T Y

Maximize Naval Shore Readiness Strengthen the SYSCOM team

5

Maximize Naval Shore Readiness

Page 6: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

6

• Facilities Technical Authority (SECNAVINST 5400.15)

• DOD Design and Construction Agent (DODI 4270.5)

• Design Engineering

• Construction Engineering

• Project Management

• Technology Innovation

• Engineering Studies, Contingency, and Unified Criteria

• All military operational theaters (peacetime to wartime & natural disasters)

EHW2 Kitsap

High Temp

Concrete JSF

Engineering Capabilities

We’re building lethality with quality, speed, and agility

Berth 11 PNSY

$-

$500.00

$1,000.00

$1,500.00

$2,000.00

$2,500.00

$3,000.00

$3,500.00

FY20 MILCON Program Planned Awards ($M)

Triton Hangar/FOB Mayport

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

$-

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

$9,000

$10,000

$-

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

$400

$450

$500

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

SRM

MC

ON

FLO

REN

CE

NAVFAC FY20 Planned Construction Obligations

Project Amount ($M) Cumulative Amount ($M)

Return 6

Page 7: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

7

Technical competency is measured by the level of Design-In-Place (DIP) that

our Echelon III/IV components deliver via In-house (IH) strategies

Targets: IH DBB > 20% || ( IH DB + IH DBB ) ~ 50%

Planning, Design & Construction – Initiatives

Schedule Adherence Cost Adherence

Requ

irem

ents

Plan

ning

Prog

ram

min

g

Des

ign

Cons

truc

tion

Cons

tr A

war

d D

ate

Cons

truc

tion

Com

plet

ion

Dat

e

464 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 2017 83.5 Under Construction 6/17 7/20

475 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 2022 66.6 Prelim Design 1/22 1/25 Early Prelim Design issued in POM 21

990 F-35B VERTICAL LIFT FAN TEST FACILITY 2018 15.7 Award Pending 9/19 5/21 2022 Field working to resolve cost risk

199 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 2019 60.0 Award Pending 9/19 3/22 2023

204F-35 TRAINING AND SIMULATOR

FACILITY2020 53.2

In Design

Cong Review8/20 9/21 2022

199AAIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR - INC

22020 74.0

In Design

Cong Review9/19 3/22 2023

197 AIRCRAFT HANGAR 2022 154.3Prelim Design

Pending1/22 1/25

239F-35 FLIGHTLINE UTILITIES UPGRADE

PHASE 22022 92.4

Prelim Design

Pending1/22 1/24

200AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR (2

MODULES)2024 110.0 Proj Development 1/24 1/27

209 F-35 CENTRAL ENGINE REPAIR FACILITY UP 18.9 Proj Development

378 F-35C HANGAR MODERNIZATION & ADD 2016 56.5 Under Construction 12/16 9/19 2019Q4 BOD on track

284 F-35 MAINTENANCE HANGAR 2019 112.7 Award Pending 9/19 10/21 2023Q2 Award on track

392 F-35 COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 2019 14.9 Under Construction 7/19 7/21 2023Q2 BOD on track

391 F-35 MAINTENANCE HANGAR ADDITION 2021 128.1 In Design 1/21 6/23 2018Q3 Programmed late-to-need

3271 F-35 SIMULATOR FACILITY & ELECT DISTR 2021 59.2 In Design 1/21 12/23 2018Q3 Programmed late-to-need

351 F-35C HANGAR 3 UPGRADE 2023 98.2 Proj Development 1/23 1/25 2025

385 F-35 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT UP 6.9 Proj Development 2025

395 F-35C UTILITIES UPGRADE UP 13.0 Proj Development 2024

Notes(29 July 2019)

MCAS BEAUFORT SC

MCAS CHERRY POINT NC

NAS LEMOORE CA

Proj

ect #

Project Title

Budg

et F

Y

Prog

ram

med

Am

t ($M

)

Status

Development

Solic

itat

ion

Construction

Nee

d D

ate

On track, no issues

Recoverable. Med Risk of Mission/Schedule impact

Recoverable. High Risk of Mission/schedule impact

Mission or Need date impacted. Not recoverable

F-35: PEO for Joint Strike Fighter

Technical Capability

We’re using data, metrics & initiatives to drive projects to the left

• Industry Engagement

• DOD MILCON Reform initiatives

(Project Management Agreements)

• Key Performance Indicators and

Project Risk Registers

• Cradle to Grave Project

Management

• Stronger Planning (scope, cost,

criteria, Project Readiness Metric)

• Cost, Schedule, Risk Analysis,

Impact of market trends

• In-House Design (Navy-unique

facility focus)

• Acquisition Strategies

(ECI/Packaging)

• Submittal Approval Reduction

• Partnering Template

• Building and Cyber Commissioning

7

Page 8: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

8

Military Construction Budget News

Department of Navy• FY21 MILCON program (PB21) submitted to Congress February 2020

• FY20 MILCON authorized (NDAA) and appropriation enacted 20 Dec 2019

• FY20 MILCON Projects (132 projects / $7,632M)

– DON 53 projects $2,701M

(Current Navy = $1,542M and 30 projects; USMC = $1,159M and 23 projects)

– Disaster Relief 35 projects $3,388M (Earthquake and Hurricanes)

– Defense 34 projects $1,238M *(1) 2808 deferred project

– GoJ 2 projects $227M

– ERCIP 8 projects $78M

• Carryover MILCON Projects (89 projects / $3,226M)

– DON 32 projects $1,292M *(15) 2808 deferred projects

(Carryover Navy = $714M and 15 projects; USMC = $578M and 17 projects)

– Disaster Relief 14 projects $582M

– Defense 25 projects $670M *(9) 2808 deferred projects

– GoJ 3 projects $560M

– ERCIP 15 projects $122M

https://www.navfac.navy.mil/products_and_services/sb/opportunities.html

10

Page 9: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

9

NAVFAC MILCON Construction

Navy

Reserves

Gov of

Japan

Guam

Family

Housing

CON

Oversea

Contingency

Operation

Support/European

Deterrence

Initiative

Hurricanes

Guam Def

Policy

Review

Initiative

China Lake

MCON (excludes MC Guam)

DEFENSE

11

Page 10: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

10

FY 20 MILCON Workload (MCON, MCNR, Family Housing, Defense, Disaster Relief, 2808 Deferred)

CATEGORY % WORKLOAD

Operational & Training Facilities 37%Housing and Community Facilities 16%Maintenance & Production Facilities 12%Utilities, Land, & Site Improvements 12%Administrative Buildings 7%Supply Facilities 7%RDT&E Facilities 6%Medical Facilities 3%Real Estate <1%

COMPONENT % WORKLOAD

Mid-Atlantic 36%Southwest 20%Marianas 13%Southeast 10%EURAFCENT 8%Washington 6%Hawaii 4%Northwest 3%Far East 2%

12

Page 11: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

11

MILCON Navy Projects

12

$0 - $5M $5M - $10M $10M - $20M $20M - $50M >$50M

FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20

NAVFAC EURAFCENT 1 1 2 3 1 2 2

NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic 2 2 2 3

NAVFAC Southeast 1 1 4 2 2

NAVFAC Washington 1 1 1

NAVFAC Far East 1 1 1

NAVFAC Hawaii 1 1

NAVFAC Marianas 1 1 1

NAVFAC Northwest 1 1 2 1 1

NAVFAC Southwest 1 4 5 4 4 22

Total 1 4 2 6 3 16 11 13 32

Page 12: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

12

MILCON USMC Projects

13

$0 - $5M $5M - $10M $10M - $20M $20M - $50M >$50M

FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20

NAVFAC EURAFCENT 1

NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic 2 1 4 3 11 2 13

NAVFAC Southeast 1

NAVFAC Washington 1 1

NAVFAC Far East 2

NAVFAC Hawaii 1 1

NAVFAC Marianas 3 3 4

NAVFAC Northwest

NAVFAC Southwest 1 3 4 1 3

Total 2 1 5 7 11 12 6 22

Page 13: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

13

Department of the NavyO&M-funded Projects

• Provides for the Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) of

facilities– “Special Projects” are centrally-managed and have higher $ value

– May be design-build or design-bid-build

– Additional smaller $ value SRM projects are managed and executed locally

• Operations & Maintenance (O&M) projects are more fluid than MILCON

• USMC FY19 and FY20 figures include Hurricane Florence Recovery SRM

projects ($1.7B total) at MCB Camp Lejeune, MCAS Cherry Point and MCAS

New River

• Navy FY20 figures include China Lake projects ($420M)

Special Projects FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

USN $772M $521M $675M $673M $1,025M

USMC $343M $196M $358M $1,090M $1,396M

16

Page 14: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

14

Navy Special Projects

• SRM projects depicted on this table are typically >$500,000 and funded by

Commander Navy Installations Command (CNIC)

• Additional SRM projects are also executed:

–Funded by other Navy Commands

–Smaller $ value projects managed at the local installation

17

$0 - $5M $5M - $10M $10M - $20M $20M - $50M

FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20

NAVFAC EURAFCENT 4 2 2 1

NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic 3 5 1 4 3 3 3 7

NAVFAC Southeast 12 1 1 1 1 3 2

NAVFAC Washington 5 3 1 1 3 1

NAVFAC Far East 2 1 2 1 3 2

NAVFAC Hawaii 2 2 1 1 2 3

NAVFAC Marianas 2 1 1 1

NAVFAC Northwest 3 4 1 3 1 2

NAVFAC Southwest 10 2 1 5 2 6 4 2

Page 15: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

15

USMC Special Projects

Notes:

• USMC projects in the NAVFAC Southeast area of responsibility are managed by

NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic, with the exception of projects at MCSF Blount Island.

• Additional smaller $ value SRM projects are managed and executed locally

$0 - $5M $5M - $10M $10M - $20M $20M - $50M

FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20

NAVFAC EURAFCENT

NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic 136 80 21 30 9 14 12 16

NAVFAC Southeast 1 2 1 1

NAVFAC Washington 34 2 1 1

NAVFAC Far East 11 35 5 2 3

NAVFAC Hawaii 11 11 2 1 1

NAVFAC Marianas

NAVFAC Northwest

NAVFAC Southwest 37 69 2 7 3 1

18

Page 16: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

16

Questions?

18

Page 17: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

17

SAMEFY2020 DOD & Federal Agency Program Briefings

-----

NAVFAC Design and Construction

Programs

17 March 2020

Cindy Readal

Assistant Commander for Acquisition

Page 18: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

18

NAVFAC Contracting

• Contracting Spend for FY19:• Total Spend: $10.8B

• CON: $3.6B

• A-E: $957M

• Services: $5.4B

• Total Number of Actions: 27K

• Firm-Fixed-Price Awards: $10.2B

• Small Business Awards: $3.9B

• Competed Contract Dollars: 87%

• 1102 Attrition Rate: 15%

• Contracting Community: 1,088

Page 19: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

19

Updates

• Industry Collaboration

• Draft RFPs

• Industry Forums

• One-on-One Sessions

•Policy Updates

• DFARS Design-Build Clause Update

• FY20 NDAA did not increase Davis Bacon threshold

• NAVFAC Small Business Subcontracting goals revised

•MACCs Necessary Tool

• Typical Capacity Range $1B+; larger capacity becoming more common (GCC, China Lake, etc.)

•Base Operating Support (BOS) Tri-Services Industry Forum

• (tentative) July 27-31, 2020 in San Antonio, TX

•NAVFAC CPARS Focus

• No increase in backlog

Page 20: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

20

Small Business Command Achievements

$ 8.11B $ 9.53B $ 3.07B

Target Dollars Actual Target Dollars Current Target Dollars Current

Small Business

(SB)46.25% $ 4.04B 49.83% 46.5% $ 4.24B 44.49% 37.44% $ 1.05B 34.38%

HUBZone 8.5% $ 850.4M 10.48% 8.5% $ 819.4M 8.59% 6.04% $ 266.4M 8.69%

Service-Disabled

Veteran-Owned

(SDVOSB)

6% $ 540.2M 6.66% 6% $ 584.7M 6.13% 4.22% $ 131.9M 4.31%

Small

Disadvantaged

Business (SDB)

30.5% $2.6B 32.09% 31% $ 2.61B 27.33% 23.57% $ 677.9M 22.10%

Woman-Owned

(WOSB)9.5% $ 687M 8.47% 9% $ 740.6M 7.77% 6.11% $ 153.5M 5.01%

US Prime

Awards

FY18 FY19* YTD FY20*

Eligible = Eligible = Eligible =

Page 21: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

21

Subcontracting Achievements

Page 22: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

22

Contract Listings and Acquisition Forecastshttp://www.navfac.navy.mil/products_and_services/sb/opportunities.html

Regional Opportunities – Command specific lists

Subcontracting Opportunities – Potential leads through various lists

Current contract listings and acquisition forecasts

POC information for both government and industry

For preliminary planning purposes only – see www.fbo.gov for solicitation announcements

Page 23: NAVFAC Design and Construction Programs

Questions?