Upload
others
View
11
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
SAME
NAVFAC Design and Construction
Programs
17 March 2020
David Curfman, P.E.
Chief Engineer, and
Assistant Commander for Capital Improvements
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
2
Over 100 Points of DeliveryLocalized Engineering, Facility Services, and Contracting
2
3
Worldwide Reach…• 100+ Points of delivery at Navy, USMC, and AF bases on five continents
• 22,000+ acquisition and sustainment professionals worldwide
• Global contracting capability for contingency construction, Base Operating Support (BOS), and related support across a
range of military operations (ROMO)
Mission: The Naval Shore Facilities, Base Operating Support, and Expeditionary Engineering
Systems Command that delivers life-cycle technical and acquisition solutions aligned to Navy and
Marine Corps priorities
…Stakeholder-Focused Approach • PRIDU, ADDU, and dedicated support
• Combatant Commanders, Fleets, CNIC,
MCICOM, State Dept, USAF, DHA, DLA etc.
• $1.1 Billion in mission funds execute $13
Billion in stakeholder funds
NAVFAC Enables Naval Forces
3
4
National Security and Naval Strategies
Guide NAVFAC’s Strategic Design
NAVFAC Strategic Design 2.0
Navy
Marine Corps
Strategic Guidance
4
5
NAVFAC Strategic Focus
6 FOCUS AREASDISTRIBUTED
MARITIMEOPERATIONS
3 LINES OF EFFORT
INFRASTRUCTURECAPABILITY
FINANCIALINTEGRITY
Enable Warfighter Lethality
PRODUCT AND SERVICE
PERFORMANCE
WORKFORCETALENT
ANALYTICALDECISION MAKING
13 Goals, 37 Initiatives
Q U A L I T Y S P E E D A G I L I T Y
Maximize Naval Shore Readiness Strengthen the SYSCOM team
5
Maximize Naval Shore Readiness
6
• Facilities Technical Authority (SECNAVINST 5400.15)
• DOD Design and Construction Agent (DODI 4270.5)
• Design Engineering
• Construction Engineering
• Project Management
• Technology Innovation
• Engineering Studies, Contingency, and Unified Criteria
• All military operational theaters (peacetime to wartime & natural disasters)
EHW2 Kitsap
High Temp
Concrete JSF
Engineering Capabilities
We’re building lethality with quality, speed, and agility
Berth 11 PNSY
$-
$500.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
$2,000.00
$2,500.00
$3,000.00
$3,500.00
FY20 MILCON Program Planned Awards ($M)
Triton Hangar/FOB Mayport
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
$500
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
SRM
MC
ON
FLO
REN
CE
NAVFAC FY20 Planned Construction Obligations
Project Amount ($M) Cumulative Amount ($M)
Return 6
7
Technical competency is measured by the level of Design-In-Place (DIP) that
our Echelon III/IV components deliver via In-house (IH) strategies
Targets: IH DBB > 20% || ( IH DB + IH DBB ) ~ 50%
Planning, Design & Construction – Initiatives
Schedule Adherence Cost Adherence
Requ
irem
ents
Plan
ning
Prog
ram
min
g
Des
ign
Cons
truc
tion
Cons
tr A
war
d D
ate
Cons
truc
tion
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e
464 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 2017 83.5 Under Construction 6/17 7/20
475 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 2022 66.6 Prelim Design 1/22 1/25 Early Prelim Design issued in POM 21
990 F-35B VERTICAL LIFT FAN TEST FACILITY 2018 15.7 Award Pending 9/19 5/21 2022 Field working to resolve cost risk
199 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 2019 60.0 Award Pending 9/19 3/22 2023
204F-35 TRAINING AND SIMULATOR
FACILITY2020 53.2
In Design
Cong Review8/20 9/21 2022
199AAIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR - INC
22020 74.0
In Design
Cong Review9/19 3/22 2023
197 AIRCRAFT HANGAR 2022 154.3Prelim Design
Pending1/22 1/25
239F-35 FLIGHTLINE UTILITIES UPGRADE
PHASE 22022 92.4
Prelim Design
Pending1/22 1/24
200AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR (2
MODULES)2024 110.0 Proj Development 1/24 1/27
209 F-35 CENTRAL ENGINE REPAIR FACILITY UP 18.9 Proj Development
378 F-35C HANGAR MODERNIZATION & ADD 2016 56.5 Under Construction 12/16 9/19 2019Q4 BOD on track
284 F-35 MAINTENANCE HANGAR 2019 112.7 Award Pending 9/19 10/21 2023Q2 Award on track
392 F-35 COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 2019 14.9 Under Construction 7/19 7/21 2023Q2 BOD on track
391 F-35 MAINTENANCE HANGAR ADDITION 2021 128.1 In Design 1/21 6/23 2018Q3 Programmed late-to-need
3271 F-35 SIMULATOR FACILITY & ELECT DISTR 2021 59.2 In Design 1/21 12/23 2018Q3 Programmed late-to-need
351 F-35C HANGAR 3 UPGRADE 2023 98.2 Proj Development 1/23 1/25 2025
385 F-35 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT UP 6.9 Proj Development 2025
395 F-35C UTILITIES UPGRADE UP 13.0 Proj Development 2024
Notes(29 July 2019)
MCAS BEAUFORT SC
MCAS CHERRY POINT NC
NAS LEMOORE CA
Proj
ect #
Project Title
Budg
et F
Y
Prog
ram
med
Am
t ($M
)
Status
Development
Solic
itat
ion
Construction
Nee
d D
ate
On track, no issues
Recoverable. Med Risk of Mission/Schedule impact
Recoverable. High Risk of Mission/schedule impact
Mission or Need date impacted. Not recoverable
F-35: PEO for Joint Strike Fighter
Technical Capability
We’re using data, metrics & initiatives to drive projects to the left
• Industry Engagement
• DOD MILCON Reform initiatives
(Project Management Agreements)
• Key Performance Indicators and
Project Risk Registers
• Cradle to Grave Project
Management
• Stronger Planning (scope, cost,
criteria, Project Readiness Metric)
• Cost, Schedule, Risk Analysis,
Impact of market trends
• In-House Design (Navy-unique
facility focus)
• Acquisition Strategies
(ECI/Packaging)
• Submittal Approval Reduction
• Partnering Template
• Building and Cyber Commissioning
7
8
Military Construction Budget News
Department of Navy• FY21 MILCON program (PB21) submitted to Congress February 2020
• FY20 MILCON authorized (NDAA) and appropriation enacted 20 Dec 2019
• FY20 MILCON Projects (132 projects / $7,632M)
– DON 53 projects $2,701M
(Current Navy = $1,542M and 30 projects; USMC = $1,159M and 23 projects)
– Disaster Relief 35 projects $3,388M (Earthquake and Hurricanes)
– Defense 34 projects $1,238M *(1) 2808 deferred project
– GoJ 2 projects $227M
– ERCIP 8 projects $78M
• Carryover MILCON Projects (89 projects / $3,226M)
– DON 32 projects $1,292M *(15) 2808 deferred projects
(Carryover Navy = $714M and 15 projects; USMC = $578M and 17 projects)
– Disaster Relief 14 projects $582M
– Defense 25 projects $670M *(9) 2808 deferred projects
– GoJ 3 projects $560M
– ERCIP 15 projects $122M
https://www.navfac.navy.mil/products_and_services/sb/opportunities.html
10
9
NAVFAC MILCON Construction
Navy
Reserves
Gov of
Japan
Guam
Family
Housing
CON
Oversea
Contingency
Operation
Support/European
Deterrence
Initiative
Hurricanes
Guam Def
Policy
Review
Initiative
China Lake
MCON (excludes MC Guam)
DEFENSE
11
10
FY 20 MILCON Workload (MCON, MCNR, Family Housing, Defense, Disaster Relief, 2808 Deferred)
CATEGORY % WORKLOAD
Operational & Training Facilities 37%Housing and Community Facilities 16%Maintenance & Production Facilities 12%Utilities, Land, & Site Improvements 12%Administrative Buildings 7%Supply Facilities 7%RDT&E Facilities 6%Medical Facilities 3%Real Estate <1%
COMPONENT % WORKLOAD
Mid-Atlantic 36%Southwest 20%Marianas 13%Southeast 10%EURAFCENT 8%Washington 6%Hawaii 4%Northwest 3%Far East 2%
12
11
MILCON Navy Projects
12
$0 - $5M $5M - $10M $10M - $20M $20M - $50M >$50M
FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20
NAVFAC EURAFCENT 1 1 2 3 1 2 2
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic 2 2 2 3
NAVFAC Southeast 1 1 4 2 2
NAVFAC Washington 1 1 1
NAVFAC Far East 1 1 1
NAVFAC Hawaii 1 1
NAVFAC Marianas 1 1 1
NAVFAC Northwest 1 1 2 1 1
NAVFAC Southwest 1 4 5 4 4 22
Total 1 4 2 6 3 16 11 13 32
12
MILCON USMC Projects
13
$0 - $5M $5M - $10M $10M - $20M $20M - $50M >$50M
FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20
NAVFAC EURAFCENT 1
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic 2 1 4 3 11 2 13
NAVFAC Southeast 1
NAVFAC Washington 1 1
NAVFAC Far East 2
NAVFAC Hawaii 1 1
NAVFAC Marianas 3 3 4
NAVFAC Northwest
NAVFAC Southwest 1 3 4 1 3
Total 2 1 5 7 11 12 6 22
13
Department of the NavyO&M-funded Projects
• Provides for the Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) of
facilities– “Special Projects” are centrally-managed and have higher $ value
– May be design-build or design-bid-build
– Additional smaller $ value SRM projects are managed and executed locally
• Operations & Maintenance (O&M) projects are more fluid than MILCON
• USMC FY19 and FY20 figures include Hurricane Florence Recovery SRM
projects ($1.7B total) at MCB Camp Lejeune, MCAS Cherry Point and MCAS
New River
• Navy FY20 figures include China Lake projects ($420M)
Special Projects FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
USN $772M $521M $675M $673M $1,025M
USMC $343M $196M $358M $1,090M $1,396M
16
14
Navy Special Projects
• SRM projects depicted on this table are typically >$500,000 and funded by
Commander Navy Installations Command (CNIC)
• Additional SRM projects are also executed:
–Funded by other Navy Commands
–Smaller $ value projects managed at the local installation
17
$0 - $5M $5M - $10M $10M - $20M $20M - $50M
FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20
NAVFAC EURAFCENT 4 2 2 1
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic 3 5 1 4 3 3 3 7
NAVFAC Southeast 12 1 1 1 1 3 2
NAVFAC Washington 5 3 1 1 3 1
NAVFAC Far East 2 1 2 1 3 2
NAVFAC Hawaii 2 2 1 1 2 3
NAVFAC Marianas 2 1 1 1
NAVFAC Northwest 3 4 1 3 1 2
NAVFAC Southwest 10 2 1 5 2 6 4 2
15
USMC Special Projects
Notes:
• USMC projects in the NAVFAC Southeast area of responsibility are managed by
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic, with the exception of projects at MCSF Blount Island.
• Additional smaller $ value SRM projects are managed and executed locally
$0 - $5M $5M - $10M $10M - $20M $20M - $50M
FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20 FY19 FY20
NAVFAC EURAFCENT
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic 136 80 21 30 9 14 12 16
NAVFAC Southeast 1 2 1 1
NAVFAC Washington 34 2 1 1
NAVFAC Far East 11 35 5 2 3
NAVFAC Hawaii 11 11 2 1 1
NAVFAC Marianas
NAVFAC Northwest
NAVFAC Southwest 37 69 2 7 3 1
18
16
Questions?
18
17
SAMEFY2020 DOD & Federal Agency Program Briefings
-----
NAVFAC Design and Construction
Programs
17 March 2020
Cindy Readal
Assistant Commander for Acquisition
18
NAVFAC Contracting
• Contracting Spend for FY19:• Total Spend: $10.8B
• CON: $3.6B
• A-E: $957M
• Services: $5.4B
• Total Number of Actions: 27K
• Firm-Fixed-Price Awards: $10.2B
• Small Business Awards: $3.9B
• Competed Contract Dollars: 87%
• 1102 Attrition Rate: 15%
• Contracting Community: 1,088
19
Updates
• Industry Collaboration
• Draft RFPs
• Industry Forums
• One-on-One Sessions
•Policy Updates
• DFARS Design-Build Clause Update
• FY20 NDAA did not increase Davis Bacon threshold
• NAVFAC Small Business Subcontracting goals revised
•MACCs Necessary Tool
• Typical Capacity Range $1B+; larger capacity becoming more common (GCC, China Lake, etc.)
•Base Operating Support (BOS) Tri-Services Industry Forum
• (tentative) July 27-31, 2020 in San Antonio, TX
•NAVFAC CPARS Focus
• No increase in backlog
20
Small Business Command Achievements
$ 8.11B $ 9.53B $ 3.07B
Target Dollars Actual Target Dollars Current Target Dollars Current
Small Business
(SB)46.25% $ 4.04B 49.83% 46.5% $ 4.24B 44.49% 37.44% $ 1.05B 34.38%
HUBZone 8.5% $ 850.4M 10.48% 8.5% $ 819.4M 8.59% 6.04% $ 266.4M 8.69%
Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned
(SDVOSB)
6% $ 540.2M 6.66% 6% $ 584.7M 6.13% 4.22% $ 131.9M 4.31%
Small
Disadvantaged
Business (SDB)
30.5% $2.6B 32.09% 31% $ 2.61B 27.33% 23.57% $ 677.9M 22.10%
Woman-Owned
(WOSB)9.5% $ 687M 8.47% 9% $ 740.6M 7.77% 6.11% $ 153.5M 5.01%
US Prime
Awards
FY18 FY19* YTD FY20*
Eligible = Eligible = Eligible =
21
Subcontracting Achievements
22
Contract Listings and Acquisition Forecastshttp://www.navfac.navy.mil/products_and_services/sb/opportunities.html
Regional Opportunities – Command specific lists
Subcontracting Opportunities – Potential leads through various lists
Current contract listings and acquisition forecasts
POC information for both government and industry
For preliminary planning purposes only – see www.fbo.gov for solicitation announcements
Questions?