Upload
zachary-nelson
View
22
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Near Earth Survey Telescope (NEST) NEO Survey Concept. NEST. Led by JHU/APL, a Joint Study with GSFC and JSC November 15, 2010. NEO Survey Mission Objectives. Search for NEOs potentially suitable for human exploration missions Search for NEOs that potentially impact Earth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Near Earth Survey Telescope (NEST)NEO Survey Concept
Led by JHU/APL, a Joint Study with GSFC and JSC November 15, 2010
NEST
22
Search for NEOs potentially suitable for human exploration missions
Search for NEOs that potentially impact Earth• Physical characterization
• Refine orbital trajectory• Measure physical properties (mass, size
and rotation)• Measure composition and internal structure
(requires spacecraft visit)• Objectives for human exploration precursors
and for planetary defense are overlapping
NEO Survey Mission Objectives
5/13/2011
33
The number of known targets meeting HSF accessibility criteria, with size > 30 m, is few or zero
Ground-based surveys will not discover suitable targets in time for HSF in 2025-2030 time frame These targets have Earth-like orbits, are almost
always in the daytime sky, and have long synodic periods
They are discovered when close to Earth, and there is typically not enough time to target a mission
A dedicated space-based NEO survey is needed to discover such targets sufficiently in advance of close encounter to Earth
Suitable targets for HSF are also of interest for planetary defense
Human Spaceflight (HSF) Survey Objectives
5/13/2011
We need to find affordable targets for 2025-2030 HSF:When: 2015 - 2020From where: spaceHow: either searching close to Sun in the sky, or searching from <1 AU orbit
The plot at the left shows the position of 20 ‘affordable’ NEAs 10 years before (open symbols) and 5 years before (closed symbols) Earth close approach. None of these objects is in the night sky at 10 and 5 years prior to their discovery periods.
CONCLUSION: For missions in 2025 – 2030, a platform in space is needed to find the most affordable targets in a timely manner.
5/13/20114
55
View the region ~40° - 70° angular distance from Sun, ± 20° from ecliptic (“sweet spot”)
Asteroids in accessible orbits are always near 1 AU and close to the ecliptic, and they must pass through the sweet spots in the years before Earth close approaches
Two sweet spots (leading, trailing)
Expect ~200 m objects to be ~24 mag in sweet spot Typically they will be detected at
~1 AU distance
Searching close to Sun in the sky:Sweet Spot Surveys from near the Earth
Red dots, NEOs. Green dots, main belt asteroids
Sun
Sweet Spot (leading)
Sweet Spot (trailing)
5/13/2011
66
Searching from trailing Venus orbit (viewing away from sun) Targets are generally outside the observatory orbit Observatory orbits the Sun faster than Earth: catch
targets with long synodic period relative to Earth Targets are generally detected <1 AU from the
observatory under optimal lighting conditions This option is recommended by the Defending Planet
Earth study for planetary defense Searching from trailing Venus orbit can be done with
optical or with mid-IR telescopes
Searching from ~0.7 AU heliocentric orbit
5/13/2011
77
Low mission cost (less than Discovery mission) Includes launch vehicle (smallest suitable)
Launch readiness in 2015
High technical maturity (current state-of-art)
Discover and characterize NEOs for human exploration More than double the known inventory of objects
within 2 yr of operation Include follow-up characterization of all discovered
objects (orbit trajectory, rotation rate, etc.)
NEO Survey Telescope (NEST) Constraints
5/13/2011
88
Our strategy is to target an optimized mission that meets ESMD’s needs for identifying and characterizing NEOs for potential human exploration
Looking for the most cost efficient solution to meet these needs Considered the “good enough” solution rather than the “be all things to
everyone” or Cadillac solution that attempts to detect all NEOs
Telescope Trade Space
5/13/2011
99
CCD camera, 16 Mpx assumed, passively cooled
Telescope conventional R-C, 90 cm aperture
Filter wheel Limiting magnitude
~24
Camera Assumptions
5/13/2011
1 0 1 0 2 6 k 4 . z m xC o n f i g u r a t i o n 1 o f 1
3 D L a y o u tR i t c h e y - C h r e t i e n T e l e s c o p e1 0 / 2 6 / 2 0 1 0
X
Y
Z
1010
Both search scenarios are assumed to use continuous search sequence
Continuous search sequence is modular (can change number of patches observed in each successive search)
Allows for characterization of selected objects with extended observations Measure colors, rotations Characterization interrupts continuous search
Characterization
5/13/2011
1111
Simulations done with the known MPC distribution, 7103 NEOs known as of end of August 2010, and with debiased distributions (following the model of Bottke et al. 2002) Two NEO size distributions considered, a “low” case and a “high” case
0.7AU/opposition search and Earth/sweet spot search Inputs are the date of the search (assumed instantaneous) and the
observer position (various positions along Earth orbit or 0.7 AU orbit, depending on the case; data from JPL Horizons, geodetic centers of the planets)
Simulation finds sky positions of all the objects at the search date and then finds if they are within the search area seen by the observer; also calculates apparent magnitude of each object in the search area of sky
NEO Search Simulations
5/13/2011
High population
Low population
5/13/201112
1313
Survey Performance Examples
The actual population of NEOs at sizes down to 50 m is highly uncertain Two models used, assuming high and low
population assumptions The actual population of highly
accessible NEOs with Earth-like orbits is even more uncertain
The Earth-based sweet spot survey is more efficient for larger objects (> 140 m), the trailing Venus/opposition survey is more efficient for smaller objects Similar discovery rates in the two cases Population uncertainty is more significant
In two years, a survey will increase total number of objects known with 0.8<a<1.2 and e<0.2 by 3 to 5 times
Survey is likely to discover several tens of targets suitable for human exploration.
40% completion in 2yr
5/13/2011
14
NEO Survey Simulations
14
≤ 180 day round trip
Re-entry speed ≤ 11.8km/s
Survey simulations performed for two NEST concepts (Sweet Spot & Opposition)• Two models used, assuming high and low population assumptions
Estimates for detected NEOs are increasingly uncertain for each successive row in the table below (represented by deepening shades of gray)
• Due to lack of knowledge of NEO population with Earth-like orbits obtained from current and past ground-based surveys
10 to several 10s of affordable NEOs in 2025-2030 should be discovered by either survey type
• Estimated from the currently known population and scaling is uncertain
Survey Duration
NEA Population Filter
Sweet Spot Survey, High NEA Pop.
Sweet Spot Survey, Low NEA Pop.
Opposition Survey, High NEA Pop.
Opposition Survey, Low NEA Pop.
Total Detections (18<H<24)
31,752 8,664 37,641 6,735
NEAs with Earth-like orbits
(0.8 < a < 1.2, e < 0.2)1093* 258 1410** 218
Estimated affordable NEAs in
2025-2030~50 ~10 ~60 ~10
Total Detections (18<H<24)
47,191 12,056 65,494 11,995
NEAs with Earth-like orbits
(0.8 < a < 1.2, e < 0.2)1532 338 2422 374
Estimated affordable NEAs in
2025-2030~65 ~15 ~100 ~15
2 years
4 years
*mean H = 21.7 (150m @ 14% albedo) **mean H = 23.0 (90m @ 14% albedo)
15
NEST mission cost without launch vehicle is ~$300 M to ~$350 M
Launch vehicle capability can be as small as Taurus II
Nominal 48 month development for 2015 launch, with 2 year prime mission
The 0.7 AU option is slightly more expensive than the L2 option
NEST Mission and Spacecraft Summary
04/19/202315
1616
NEO survey mission is an excellent opportunity for international cooperation
No new technology development is required
Between COROT and GAIA in technical requirements
Survey Mission Opportunities
5/13/2011