Upload
trandieu
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
LINKING LINKING DISASTER RISK REDUCTION DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
TO DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGTO DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
SUSAN RACHEL G. JOSEDirector III and Officer-in-Charge
Regional Development Coordination StaffNational Economic and Development Authority
2
OutlineOutline• The Case for DRR-Development
Planning Linkage• Development Planning System of the
Philippines • Current Practices • Perspectives for Strengthening DRR-
Development Planning Links: The NEDA-UNDP-EC Mainstreaming Technical Assistance
3
The case for DRR The case for DRR and and DevPlanningDevPlanning LinkageLinkage
4
Disaster losses among Disaster losses among developing countriesdeveloping countries
Source: Munich ReSource: Munich ReWBWB
5
Estimated Damage of Disasters Estimated Damage of Disasters (In M P @ 2000 Prices)(In M P @ 2000 Prices)
010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,000
19 70 19 71 19 72 19 73 19 74 19 75 19 76 19 77 19 78 19 79 19 8 0 19 8 1 19 8 2 19 8 319 8 4 19 8 5 19 8 6 19 8 7 19 8 8 19 8 9 19 9 0 19 9 1 19 9 2 19 9 3 19 9 4 19 9 5 19 9 6 19 9 719 9 8 19 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6
On the average, annual direct damage is P15 B
Pinatubo Eruption(1991)
15 disasters (1978)
Droughts(1984; 1987)
1.2% of GDP
0.9% of GDP
Luzon Earthquake(1990)
For typhoons, average of 0.5% of GDP every year
Source: WBSource: WB--NDCC NDCC
6
Loss of Lives from DisastersLoss of Lives from Disasters
01000200030004000500060007000
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 19901991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 20012002 2003 2004 2005 2006
7
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
APPROPRIATIONS COST OF DAMAGE
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 20002001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
CALAMITY FUND APPROPRIATIONS VS. CALAMITY FUND APPROPRIATIONS VS. COST OF DAMAGE COST OF DAMAGE
(1991(1991--2007)*2007)*
*January to June 2007. Appropriations include 8 billion CARE fund
8
1 1 Billion PesosBillion Pesos
ClassroomsClassrooms2,5002,500 Elementary levelElementary level2,1742,174 Secondary levelSecondary level
161.29161.29 kilometers of new farmkilometers of new farm--toto--market roadsmarket roads
20,00020,000 Core Resettlement UnitsCore Resettlement Units
50,00050,000 Level III water supply projectsLevel III water supply projects
9
Development GoalsDevelopment Goals
Improving indicators of social and economic development
Short-term
Meeting the Millennium development Goals
Medium-term
Sustainable human development
Long-term
10
the pathway that we taketowards achieving
developmentdevelopment goals can lead to disastercan lead to disaster, just as disaster can interrupt disaster can interrupt the
development development process
11
disaster riskdisaster riskis a product of
inappropriate development choicesinappropriate development choices, just as much as it is a threat for
future development gainsfuture development gains
12
DisasterDisaster--Development NexusDevelopment Nexus
Building community cohesion, recognizing excluded individuals or social groups (such as women), and providing opportunities for greater involvement in decision making, enhanced educational and health capacity increases resiliency
•Access to adequate drinking water, food waste management and a secure dwelling increases people’s resiliency•Trade and technology can reduce proverty•Investing in financial mechanisms and social security can cushion against vulnerability
Development reduces disaster risk
Development paths generating cultural norms that promote social isolation or political exclusion
•Unsustainable development practices that create wealth for some at the expense of unsafe working or living conditions for others or degrade the environment
Development causes disaster risk
•Destruction of health or education infrastructure and personnel•Death, disablement or migration of key social actors leading to erosion of social capital
•Destruction of fixed assets•Loss of production capacity, market access or material inputs•Damage to transport, communications or energy infrastructure•Erosion of livelihoods, savings and physical capital
Disaster limits development
Social DevelopmentEconomic Development
Source: UNDP: Reducing Disaster Risk, A Challenge for DevelopmenSource: UNDP: Reducing Disaster Risk, A Challenge for Developmentt
13
Paradigm ShiftParadigm Shift
Disaster Response
Disaster RiskReduction
EmergencySpecialists, Hazard
Scientists
Risks Specialists, Development Planners & Economic Managers
14
Global Policy ContextHyogo Framework Action PrioritiesHyogo Framework Action Priorities
1. Ensure that disaster reduction is a national and local priority with a strong institutional basis for implementation.
2. Identify, assess and monitor disaster risks and enhance early warning
3. Use knowledge, innovation and education to build a culture of safety and resilience at all levels
4.4. Reduce the underlying risk factorsReduce the underlying risk factors5. Strengthen disaster preparedness for
effective response at all levels
15
Mitigation
Rehabilitation Response
Preparedness
Continuing Implementation DRM Projects READY Project – 27 ProvGOP Multi-Hazard Mapg – 16 ProvPIP Project (DPWH & DepEd)NEDA Mainstreaming DRR in Dev’t Plans
Response Preparedness
Capacity Building
Build disaster resilient infrastructure and communities
Rebuild houses and restore damaged infrastructure
Address the immediate need for alternative livelihood
Strengthen disaster risk reduction measures
Strengthen institutional capacity
Provide for business continuity
Disaster Risk Management Focus vs. Disaster Risk Management Focus vs. Disaster ResponseDisaster Response
Pre-Event
Post-Event
Continuing Implementation of NDCC 4-pt Plan of ActionECLAC MethodologyOther NDCC Priorities
Flood Mitigation MasterplanKeeping the Phils. Bird-Flu FreeFormulation of a Comprehensive DRM Framework
Source: NDCC
16
Development Planning System Development Planning System of the Philippinesof the Philippines
17
Development Planning ProcessDevelopment Planning Process
PlanningPlanning Investment ProgrammingInvestment
ProgrammingRevenue
GenerationRevenue
Generation
Project Evaluation & Development
Project Evaluation & Development
BudgetingBudgeting
ExpenditureManagementExpenditureManagement
Programs/Projects/ Activities (PPAs)
ImplementationImplementation
Monitoring &ImplementationMonitoring &
Implementation
18
Development PlanningDevelopment PlanningProcess & OutputsProcess & Outputs
C/MDPC/MDPCLUP CLUP
NationalNationalExpenditureExpenditure
ProgramProgram
National/National/RegionalRegional
ProvincialProvincial
City/MunicipalCity/Municipal
19
Development PlansDevelopment Plans
Multisectoral plan which embodies the vision, sectoral goals, objectives, development strategies and policies within the medium-termIt contains corresponding programs, projects and activities which serve as primary inputs to investment programming
20
Physical Framework PlanPhysical Framework Plan
• 30-year land use policy agenda that synchronizes concerns for sustainable land use, economic growth and social equity
• Provides policy directions and options in the allocation and utilization land resources
• Covers proposals for settlements development, production land use, protection land use and infrastructure development
21
Investment ProgramsInvestment Programs
Investment schedule and financing plan consisting of a prioritized list of programs, projects and activities derived from the development plans and matched with financing resourcesannual component, AIP, is a major input for budgeting
22
Organizational Structure for Development Planning
NationalNational
Regional Regional
LocalLocal
NEDA BoardNEDA BoardNLUCNLUC
RDCRDCRLUCRLUC
Local Local DCsDCsPLUCsPLUCs
NEDA SecretariatNEDA Secretariat
NEDA Regional Office NEDA Regional Office (NRO)(NRO)
Provincial/City/Provincial/City/Municipal Planning & Municipal Planning & Development OfficeDevelopment Office
SanggunianSanggunian
23
GUIDELINES ON PROVINCIAL/LOCAL PLANNING EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
&
••••
MTPDIP
PDPFPPDIP/AIPAdditional sources ofrevenues
LDIP
RDIPRDP/RPFP
City/Municipal
DevelopmentPlan
MTPDP/NFPPMTPIP
PDPFP PDIP/AIP
City/ Municipal
DIP
RDIPRDP/RPFP
••••Annual budgetDisbursementcontrol system
Provincial Expenditure
Program
MTPDP/NFPP ••
Multi -yrexpend planAnnual budgetDisbursementcontrol system
National Expenditure
Program
••••Annual budgetDisbursementcontrol system
City/Municipal Expenditure Program
NEDANEDA DBMDBM
DILGDILG
DOFDOF
RevenueGeneration & Administration
Budgetary Issuances
PLPEMGuides
CDP Manual
City/Municipal Dev’tPlans
JMC No. 1 (s. 2007)JMC No. 1 (s. 2007)
25
Current PracticesCurrent Practices
26
DRR in the MTPDP/SERDRR in the MTPDP/SERChapter 23: Environment and Natural Resources
Thrust 5: Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters to prevent the loss of lives and properties
• Geohazard mapping
• Gephazard assessment including Leyte, Biliran, Surigao del Sur and Surigao del Norte
• Identification of resettlement sites in Ginsaugon, Southern Leyte
• Implementation of structural measures: Mt. Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Mitigation Project
• Construction and rehabilitation of drainage facilities by DPWH and MMDA
• Flood management projects facilitated (ROW resolution, ICC processing)
27
DRR in the MTPDP/SERDRR in the MTPDP/SERChapter 12:Responding to the Basic Needs of the
Poor
Protection of the Vulnerable
• Periodic risk assessments
• Updating of land use policy based on risk assessments
• Disaster/management orientation/training for LGUs
• Institutionalization of community-based disaster risk management
• Advocacy of passage of the DRM bill, “An Act Strengthening the Philippine Disaster Risk Management Capability, Appropriating Funds Thereof and for Other Purposes
• Disaster response, relief and rehabilitation
28
DRR in the MTPDP/SERDRR in the MTPDP/SERChapter 12:Responding to the Basic Needs of the
Poor
Protection of the Vulnerable (continued…)
• Emergency loan from GSIS and loan moratorium by GSIS and SSS
• Coordinated disaster recovery plan to ensure undisrupted operations or timely opening of financial sector institutions after a catastrophic event
Development concern raised:
• need for an overall framework for disaster smanagement
• Better and functional coordination system among national and local governments, donors, private sector and communities
• Adequate and working human and institutional capacities on DRM at both national and local levels
29
DRR in the MTPDP/SERDRR in the MTPDP/SERChapter 15: Peace and Order
Organization of community-based institutions (CBIs), which include Disaster Coordinating Councils, in the LGUs which are instrumental in better maintenance of peace and order and public safety in the communities.
Chapter 18: Science and Technology
Priority areas in ICT include better delivery of critical information on disaster mitigation
30
DRR in the MTPDP/SERDRR in the MTPDP/SERChapter 23: Defense Against Threat to National
Security
Disaster Response
• Implementation of the forecasting capabilities of PAGASA and PHIVOLCS under the close supervision and coordination with DOST
• Launching of public awareness program on disaster preparrredness
• Capacity building for LGUs
• Government-Private Sector collaboration in relief and rehabilitation
• Disaster preparedness Capacities of REINA to Geologic and Meteorological Hazards
• Hazards Mapping and Assessment for Effective Community-based DRM (READY)
31
DRM Policies/Strategies in the NFPPDRM Policies/Strategies in the NFPP
• Identify and demarcate boundaries of hazard-prone areas on the ground
• In general, areas that pose extreme and frequent danger to the most number of people, whether direct or indirect, should be given priority in resolving land use conflicts
• Establish and disseminate standard parameters and databases that will aid in the identification and management of high-risk, hazard-prone areas and in the application of appropriate planning measures
• Identify and implement appropriate physical planning measures as part of comprehensive disaster mitigation plans for hazard-prone areas
32
DRM Policies/Strategies in the NFPPDRM Policies/Strategies in the NFPP
• Increase public awareness on the value of disaster preparedness
• Increase public participation in the conservation and disaster mitigation efforts within their communities
• Others
- Assess areas in terms of their vulnerability to natural hazards, determine the risks involved and make appropriate decisions on how the development of these areas should be planned and implemented
- Early warning for tsunamis
- Hazard zonation maps showing areas prone to particular hazards featuring permanent danger zones
33
NFPP Policies incorporated in RPFPs
RegionNFPP Basic Policy/Strategy
CAR, 1, 4A,4B, 5, 6, 11
Fostering public awareness on the value of disaster preparedness
All except Regs. 7, 9
Identification, implementation of planning appropriate measures as part of mitigation plans for hazard-prone areas
All, except Regs. 3, 8, 9
Identification, mapping and delineation of hazard-prone areas
34
DRR in DRR in RDPsRDPs
In general, implicit policies/strategies on DRR were indicated
DRR concerns are webbed in the environment, physical planning aspects of the RDP
DRR included as sub-section of Environmental Protection (e.g., Forest Management), Infrastructure Development (Flood control and Drainage) such as in RDPs of ARMM
In selected regions where disaster-related concerns are eminent, there are separate sections on DRR/DRM, e.g., Central Luzon, Bicol, or where DRR was treated as an issue of governance, e.g.,Davao Region, Caraga
35
Sectoral InitiativesSectoral Initiatives
• DPWH: mainstreaming DRM in their project development cycle for roads and bridges
• DepEd: design of safe schools• DOH: design of safe hospitals• MGB, PAGASA, PHIVOLCS, DA (BSWM),
NAMRIA- hazard mapping, IEC
36
PerspectivesPerspectives for Strengthening DRRfor Strengthening DRR--Development Planning Links at the Development Planning Links at the
SubnationalSubnational Level: Level: The NEDAThe NEDA--UNDPUNDP--EC Technical Assistance on EC Technical Assistance on
MainstreamingMainstreaming
37
• Make available hazard maps and other technical information
• Enhance LGU capacity to institute preventive/mitigating measures
• Prepare DRR enhanced RPFPs
NLUCNLUC’’ss DRR Action AgendaDRR Action Agenda
Strengthen disaster mitigation
38
Why special attention for integrating Why special attention for integrating DRR at the subnational levelDRR at the subnational level
• DRR is a critical part of development plans and programs at all levels of governance
• Subnational means interregional/special areas such as riverbasins and watersheds, regional and provincial/local
• Hazards are location specific• Hazards do not respect political boundaries;
thus efficient to address it at the provincial, regional and interregional levels
• More specific interventions can be designed at the subnational level
• Community participation is critical for success
39
General Framework General Framework
1. Analysis of the Planning EnvironmentExplore the role of natural hazards
and related risks in meeting developmentgoals and objectives
2. Set development objectivesDetermine whether and how to build disaster risk reduction into key
merium- and long-term objectives
3. Define, prioritize and programs interventionsConsider actions to reduce vulnerability to
Natural hazards in designing macroeconomic, structural and social policies and programmes
4. Establish M and E ProceduresInclude DRR in short- and long-term targets and inidcators as relevant , in
particular, capturing impacts of related initiatives on the poor and reduced vulnerabilities and reduced losses
5 Implementation , evaluation and feedbackAssess disaster risk reduction achievements and shortcomings, including adequacy
of initial disaster risk analysis
Significant disaster risk?Significant disaster risk?
YesYes
Adopted (with modifications) from Adopted (with modifications) from ProVentionProVention (2007)(2007)
No further needNo further needto considerto consider
Disaster riskDisaster risk
NoNo
On
goin
g co
nsu
ltat
ion
wit
h s
take
hol
der
s,
On
goin
g co
nsu
ltat
ion
wit
h s
take
hol
der
s,
Incl
udi
ng
rep
rese
nta
tive
s fr
om h
igh
ly v
uln
erab
leIn
clu
din
g re
pre
sen
tati
ves
from
hig
hly
vu
lner
able
segm
ents
of
the
com
mu
nit
yse
gmen
ts o
f th
e co
mm
un
ity
40
Risk Identification, Assessment, Quantification
Goals and Objectives of Risk Management
Evaluation and Risk Management Decisions
• Avoidance or Elimination• Reduction or Mitigation• Sharing or Transfer• Retention
ImplementationEvaluation of Risk Assessments Disaster Reduction DecisionsBest Practices
Expenditure Plan/Budget
Alternative Financing Schemes Risk Transfers (i.e., insurance)
Formulation of DRR Policies, Implementation Tools:
Settlement, Protection, Production and Transportation/
Infrastructure
Incorporate risk concerns
Sustainabledevelopment
Disaster/risk free
Jnstitutional Strengthening
Monitoring & Evaluation
Adoption
Feedback
Feedback
Risk Identification, Assessment, Quantification
Goals and Objectives of Risk Management
Evaluation and Risk Management Decisions
• Avoidance or Elimination• Reduction or Mitigation• Sharing or Transfer• Retention
ImplementationEvaluation of Risk Assessments Disaster Reduction DecisionsBest Practices
Expenditure Plan/Budget
Alternative Financing Schemes Risk Transfers (i.e., insurance)
Formulation of DRR Policies, Implementation Tools:
Settlement, Protection, Production and Transportation/
Infrastructure
Incorporate risk concerns
Sustainabledevelopment
Disaster/risk free
Jnstitutional Strengthening
Monitoring & Evaluation
Adoption
Feedback
Feedback
General Concept General Concept Of DRROf DRR--Plan MainstreamingPlan Mainstreaming
41
Project BriefProject Brief
DIPECHO (Grant) – Euros 350,000/NEDA & UNDP (Counterpart)
Financing
NEDA-RDOUNDP
Implementing Agencies
• Land use planners at the sub-national level• Regional Land Use Committees• Selected Provincial Land Use Committees• ARMM-Regional Economic and
Development Planning Board
Target Beneficiaries
15 June 2007 to 14 May 2008 (11 months) Duration
Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Management in Sub-national Development and Physical Planning in the Philippines
Title
42
OutputsOutputs• Guidelines for Mainstreaming DRR in
Subnational Development and Physical Framework Planning
• Input Studies (e.g., assessing cost effectiveness of DRM measures, alternative financing schemes/risk transfer, technical and communication issues on hazard and vulnerability mapping, inputs to CDRMF)
• DRR-enhanced regional and provincial plans• Trained national, regional and local planners on DRM
Mainstreaming
43
Risk Identification, Assessment, Quantification
Goals and Objectives of Risk Management
Evaluation and Risk Management Decisions
• Avoidance or Elimination• Reduction or Mitigation• Sharing or Transfer• Retention
ImplementationEvaluation of Risk Assessments Disaster Reduction DecisionsBest Practices
Expenditure Plan/Budget
Alternative Financing Schemes Risk Transfers (i.e., insurance)
Formulation of DRR Policies, Implementation Tools:
Settlement, Protection, Production and Transportation/
Infrastructure
Incorporate risk concerns
Sustainabledevelopment
Disaster/risk free
Jnstitutional Strengthening
Monitoring & Evaluation
Adoption
Feedback
Feedback
Risk Identification, Assessment, Quantification
Goals and Objectives of Risk Management
Evaluation and Risk Management Decisions
• Avoidance or Elimination• Reduction or Mitigation• Sharing or Transfer• Retention
ImplementationEvaluation of Risk Assessments Disaster Reduction DecisionsBest Practices
Expenditure Plan/Budget
Alternative Financing Schemes Risk Transfers (i.e., insurance)
Formulation of DRR Policies, Implementation Tools:
Settlement, Protection, Production and Transportation/
Infrastructure
Incorporate risk concerns
Sustainabledevelopment
Disaster/risk free
Jnstitutional Strengthening
Monitoring & Evaluation
Adoption
Feedback
Feedback
General Concept General Concept Of DRROf DRR--Plan MainstreamingPlan Mainstreaming
Risk Identification, Assessment, Quantification
Goals and Objectives of Risk Management
Evaluation and Risk Management Decisions
• Avoidance or Elimination• Reduction or Mitigation• Sharing or Transfer• Retention
ImplementationEvaluation of Risk Assessments Disaster Reduction DecisionsBest Practices
Expenditure Plan/Budget
Alternative Financing Schemes Risk Transfers (i.e., insurance)
Formulation of DRR Policies, Implementation Tools:
Settlement, Protection, Production and Transportation/
Infrastructure
Incorporate risk concerns
Sustainabledevelopment
Disaster/risk free
Jnstitutional Strengthening
Monitoring & Evaluation
Adoption
Feedback
Feedback
Risk Identification, Assessment, Quantification
Goals and Objectives of Risk Management
Evaluation and Risk Management Decisions
• Avoidance or Elimination• Reduction or Mitigation• Sharing or Transfer• Retention
ImplementationEvaluation of Risk Assessments Disaster Reduction DecisionsBest Practices
Expenditure Plan/Budget
Alternative Financing Schemes Risk Transfers (i.e., insurance)
Formulation of DRR Policies, Implementation Tools:
Settlement, Protection, Production and Transportation/
Infrastructure
Incorporate risk concerns
Sustainabledevelopment
Disaster/risk free
Jnstitutional Strengthening
Monitoring & Evaluation
Adoption
Feedback
Feedback
General Concept General Concept Of DRROf DRR--Plan MainstreamingPlan Mainstreaming
NDCC Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management FrameworkNDCC Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management Framework
Benchmarking the planning machineryin key areas of mainstreaming:•Policy•Strategy•Geographical Planning•External Relations•Institutional Capacity
(Based on Tearfund Template)
44
Key Areas and Performance IndicatorsKey Areas and Performance Indicators
Policy on disaster risk reduction with realistic achievable goals for mainstreaming understood and accepted.
Policy addresses 3 critical issues:•Ensuring development programs are protected through DRR elements•Ensuring that DRR programs are managed in a developmental manner•Ensuring programs to not increase people’s vulnerability to disasters
Conceptual framework ofrdisaster management available which recognizes vulnerability as contributing to risk of disasters
Wide cross-section of staff engaged in consultative process to inform of policy to mainstream diasater risk
General awareness of disasters including extent of threat
Recognition of need to link development in a coordinated approach to reducing disaster risks
No or little understanding of relevance of DRR to development planning practice
Policy
Level 4Level 3Level 2Level 1Key Area
45
Risk reduction policy endorsed by senior management
Risk reduction policy is reflected in internal and external documents
Policy
Availability of a comprehensive mainstreaming strategy based on conceptual work and policy
The strategy is endorsed by senior management
The strategy is reflected in internal and external documents
A wide cross-section of staff are engaged in consultative process to:•Develop a strategy which mainstreams DRR in operations•Ensure that mainstreaming DRR is part of strategic framework
Ad hoc decision making for DRR is recognized as inadequate
There is widespread awareness of the need to develop a strategi approach to DRR in response to policy directives
DRR is done on an ad hoc basis and there is little or no recognition of the need for strategic approach to reducing risks
Strategy
Level 4Level 3Level 2Level 1Key Area
Key Areas and Performance IndicatorsKey Areas and Performance Indicators
46
There is ongoing analysis of the disaster environment on any given location (I.e., assessment of hazards, disaster impact, vulnerabilities and risks). This analysis involves perspectives of local communities, NGOs and other stakeholders.
Appropriate risk reduction strategies are developed on the basis of the above and integrated into new geographical plans
Inclusion of disaster risk assessment in national framework
The organization is developing a process to ensure that all planning frameworks include DRR
Widespread understanding of the disaster-risk-vulnerability relationship at relevant geographical levels
Widespread understanding of the need to apply policy commitment to RR within geograohicalplanning including financing support mechanisms
Organization is considering how existing geographical planning tools can be redesigned to take account of hazards, risks and vulnerabilities
Little or no awareness of the need to consider disaster risks within geographical planning
Geographical planning
Level 4Level 3Level 2Level 1Key Area
Key Areas and Performance IndicatorsKey Areas and Performance Indicators
47
Project cycles routinely incorporate DRR in planning, implementation and evaluation
Recommendations arising from M and E inform project redesign
Where explicit DRR programs are established, these are linked to organizations’humanitarian/development programs
An approach to ensure hazards, risks and vulnerabilities are addressed within project planning, implementation and evaluation according to the local context
Need for reducing disaster risks within every aspect of project cycle management recognized for dual purpose of:•Protecting projects from disaster impact•Ensuring that new projects do not increase disaster risks or enhance vulnerability
•Considering how project cycle management tools can be redesigned to take into account hazards, risks and vulnerabilities
Little or no understanding of importance of addressing hazards, risks and vulnerabilities within project cycle management
Project Cycle Management
Level 4Level 3Level 2Level 1Key Area
Key Areas and Performance IndicatorsKey Areas and Performance Indicators
48
Supports, enables and invests in capacity development for DRR within its implementing partners
Collaboration with other key players and relevant regional and global coordinating or networking bodies, and information expertise and resources are shared as required. Common policies and strategies may be developed.
“Public face” of the organization reflects its DRR policy and strategy
All relevant stakeholders including implementing partners and collaborating bodies are identified through stakeholders analysis
Linkages are being made with key stakeholders at local, national and international levels to raise awareness of DRR policy and strategy; to develop collaborative work; and to learn from others’ approaches/ research
Organization recognizes that it cannot act alone in the field of DRR
Works independently in DRR and has little or no awareness of the need to collaborate with others
External Relations
Level 4Level 3Level 2Level 1Key Area
Key Areas and Performance IndicatorsKey Areas and Performance Indicators
49
Institutional capacity is sufficient to support all processes:•Financial resources•Skills and knowledge (staff training and development, materials and appropriate technical support)•Strong commitment and ownership of risk reduction policy and strategy at all levels
•Strong links between CO-Ro staff who have access to services and exchange of information
Plans are being made to develop supportive institutional environment for mainstreaming DRR
Tools are being developed to assess the organization’s progress with mainstreaming
Recognition of the need to develop appropriate capacity including sufficient resources to support the process of mainstreaming risk reduction
Little or no capacity to mainstream DRR, and little or no recognition of the need to increase/develop its financial and human resources for this purpose
Institutional Capacity
Level 4Level 3Level 2Level 1Key AreaKey Areas and Performance IndicatorsKey Areas and Performance Indicators
50
Tools are routinely used independently and comprehensively to assess the organization’s progress with mainstreaming
Institutional Capacity
Level 4Level 3Level 2Level 1Key Area
Source: Tearfund, Mainstreaming DRR: A tool for development organizations
Key Areas and Performance IndicatorsKey Areas and Performance Indicators
51
Management ArrangementsManagement ArrangementsOverall supervision and policy directions
• Chair: DDG-RDO
• Members: UNDP, ECHO, DILG, OCD, MGB, PAGASA, PHIVOLCS, League of Provinces, 2 RDC Chair, 2 Governors
Project Board
Oversight, monitoring functions
• Delegated to UNDP
Project Assurance
For day-to-day operations, implementation of project activities
• NEDA-RDCS in coordination with UNDP, concerned NEDA Regional Offices and consulting team
• RLUCs/PLUCs
Project Management Team
52
Collaborative ArrangementsCollaborative Arrangements
Collaboration with mapping & risk assessment activities of the ongoing READY Project and other related government initiatives
Project will use multi-hazard maps and risk assessment data from the READY Project
UNDP to provide Rapid Earthquake Damage Assessment System (REDAS) GIS software through the READY Project
53
Potential Pilot AreasPotential Pilot Areas
BenguetBenguet
QuezonQuezonAlbayAlbay
LeyteLeyteSurigao del NorteSurigao del Norte
Surigao del SurSurigao del Sur
54
Susceptibility to Hazards:
Ground rupture, liquefaction, landslides, floods, and erosion
Capacity:
Risk identification – between Barely sufficient and Sufficient
Policies, Structures – Barely Sufficient
Commitment - between Barely sufficient and Sufficient
On going initiatives:
READY Phase 2
Land Susceptibility Mapping
Maps:
Available through PhiVolcs, MGB, BSWM
1. Benguet1. Benguet
55
2. Quezon2. QuezonSusceptibility to Hazards:
Ground rupture, Ground shaking, Liquefaction, Landslides, Volcanic Hazards, Tsunami, Floods
Capacity:Risk identification – between Barely sufficient and SufficientPolicies, Structures – Barely SufficientCommitment - Barely sufficient
Ongoing DRR Initiatives:Disaster Mitigation Measures to Minimize Damages Caused by Natural Hazards (PhiVolcs)Geohazard Mapping (MGB)Capacity Building on Geohazards and Geoharzards Mapping (MGB, UNDP)
Maps:
Available through PhiVolcs, MGB, PAGASA
56
3. Albay3. AlbaySusceptibility to Hazards:
Ground rupture, Ground shaking, Liquefaction, Landslides, Volcanic Hazards, Tsunami, Floods
Capacity:Risk identification –SufficientPolicies, Structures – Very SufficientCommitment – Between Sufficient and Very
Sufficient
Ongoing DRR Initiatives:Socio-Economic and Physical Profile System (NEDA
Region 5/RDC)Rapid Disaster Risk Assessment (Manila
Observatory in partnership with various agencies)Disaster Mitigation Through Enhanced Forecasts
Using Numerical Prediction Products and Satellite Data (PAGASA-DOST-GIA)
Institutionalization of Provincial Disaster Management Office Networking with warning agencies/stakeholders
Integration of DRR in policies/ programs of LGUs
Maps:Available through MGB, PhiVolcs, BSWM
57
4. Leyte4. Leyte Susceptibility to Hazards: Ground Rupture, Ground Shaking, Liquefaction, Earthquake-induced Landslide, Tsunami, Flash floods, Erosion, Storm Surge
Capacity:Risk identification – SufficientPolicies, Structures – SufficientCommitment - Sufficient
Ongoing DRR Initiatives:READY Phase 2MGB National Geohazards Mapping AssessmentVarious IEC Programs Multi-hazard Mapping
Maps:Available through READY, PhiVolcs, MGB, BSWM
58
5. Surigao del Norte5. Surigao del Norte Susceptibility to Hazards:
Ground Rupture, Ground Shaking, Liquefaction, Landslide, Tsunami, Volcanic Hazards, Flash floods, Storm Surge, Mass Movement/Fluvial/Earthquake-related Flooding, ErosionCapacity:
Risk identification – Nearly SufficientPolicies, Structures – Barely SufficientCommitment – Nearly SufficientOngoing DRR Initiatives:READY Phase 2MGB National Geohazards Mapping AssessmentVarious IEC Programs Multi-hazard MappingPhysical/Structural Mitigation
Maps:Available through READY, PhiVolcs, MGB, BSWM
59
6. Surigao del Sur6. Surigao del Sur Susceptibility to Hazards:
Ground Rupture, Earthquake-induced landslide, Erosion
Capacity:Risk identification – Nearly SufficientPolicies, Structures –SufficientCommitment –Sufficient
Ongoing DRR Initiatives:READY Phase 2MGB National GeohazardsMapping AssessmentMultihazard mappingVarious IEC Programs
Maps: Available through READY, PhiVolcs, BSWM