Upload
shanon-clifford-chapman
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NEESR-SG-2005NEESR-SG-2005SeismicSeismic Simulation and Simulation and
Design of Bridge Columns Design of Bridge Columns under Combined Actions, and under Combined Actions, and
Implications on System Implications on System ResponseResponseUniversity of Nevada, Reno
University of Missouri, RollaUniversity of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana
University of California, Los AngelesWashington University, St. Louis
ParticipantsParticipants
University of Nevada, RenoUniversity of Nevada, RenoDavid Sanders (Project PI)David Sanders (Project PI)
University of Missouri, University of Missouri, RollaRolla Abdeldjelil “DJ” Belarbi (co-PI)Abdeldjelil “DJ” Belarbi (co-PI) Pedro SilvaPedro Silva Ashraf AyoubAshraf Ayoub
University of Illinois-University of Illinois-Champaign-UrbanaChampaign-Urbana Amr Elnashai (co-PI)Amr Elnashai (co-PI) Reginald DesRoches (GaTech)Reginald DesRoches (GaTech)
University of University of California, Los California, Los AngelesAngeles Jian Zhang (co-PI)Jian Zhang (co-PI)
Washington Washington University, St. LouisUniversity, St. Louis Shirley Dyke (co-PI)Shirley Dyke (co-PI)
University of Mexico University of Mexico Sergio AlcocerSergio Alcocer
Causes of Combined Causes of Combined ActionsActions
System to Component to SystemSystem to Component to System Functional Constraints Functional Constraints - curved or - curved or
skewed bridges skewed bridges Geometric Considerations - Geometric Considerations - uneven uneven
spans or different column heightsspans or different column heights Multi-directional Earthquake Multi-directional Earthquake
Motions Motions -significant vertical motions -significant vertical motions input or near field fling impactsinput or near field fling impacts
Structural Constraints Structural Constraints - stiff deck, - stiff deck, movement joints, soil condition and movement joints, soil condition and foundationsfoundations
Significance of Vertical Significance of Vertical Motion Motion Effects of Vertical Motions on StructuresEffects of Vertical Motions on Structures
Direct Compressive FailureDirect Compressive Failure Reduction of Shear and Moment CapacityReduction of Shear and Moment Capacity Increase in Shear and Moment DemandIncrease in Shear and Moment Demand
Axial Force ResponseAxial Force Response
Santa Monica Freeway, Pier 6
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11
time: seconds
axia
l fo
rce:
kN
TransverseTrans + LongTrans + Vert
Significance of Torsion Interaction of Shear-Torsion results in
early cover spalling of non-circular/rectangular cross-sections due to circulatory shear stresses.
What are the effects of warping on the flexural and shear capacity of columns?
What is the impact of multiple loadings on thin-tube theory?
What are the effects on the curvature
ductility and location of the plastic hinge?
ParametersParameters Cross-section - Circle, Interlocking Spiral, Square Column aspect ratio - moment/shear ratio Torsion/shear ratio - high and low torsion Level of axial loads Level of detailing for high and moderate seismicity Bidirectional bending moment - non-circular
cross-sections Type of Loading – Slow Cyclic, Pseudo-dynamic and
shake table/dynamic
Pre-test System AnalysisPre-test System Analysis Perform seismic simulations of bridge Perform seismic simulations of bridge
systems under combined actions to study systems under combined actions to study effects of various bridge components on effects of various bridge components on global and local seismic response behavior of global and local seismic response behavior of bridge systembridge system Bridge superstructureBridge superstructure Columns (Piers)Columns (Piers) Foundations and surrounding soilFoundations and surrounding soil EmbankmentsEmbankments Nonlinear soil-foundation-structure interactionNonlinear soil-foundation-structure interaction Multi-directional motionsMulti-directional motions
Analysis Analysis Selected 4 ground motion suites that incorporate Selected 4 ground motion suites that incorporate
the site-dependent probabilistic hazard analysis the site-dependent probabilistic hazard analysis and ground motion disaggregation analysis.and ground motion disaggregation analysis.
Selected 2 bridge prototypes that are distinctive Selected 2 bridge prototypes that are distinctive in terms of structural characteristics and in terms of structural characteristics and dynamic properties.dynamic properties.
Conducted time history analysis of prototype Conducted time history analysis of prototype bridges subjected to multi-directional ground bridges subjected to multi-directional ground shakings and evaluate the effect of vertical shakings and evaluate the effect of vertical motions on seismic demand.motions on seismic demand.
Implemented nonlinear structural and Implemented nonlinear structural and foundation elements.foundation elements.
Examples of Prototype Examples of Prototype BridgesBridges
Structural Structural CharacterisCharacteris
ticstics
Design Example Design Example #4#4 Design Example #8Design Example #8
Span/Span Span/Span LengthLength
Three-span Three-span continuous, 320 ft continuous, 320 ft
longlong
Five-span continuous,Five-span continuous,
500 ft long500 ft long
Pier TypePier TypeTwo-column Two-column
integral bent, integral bent, pinned at basepinned at base
Two-column integral Two-column integral bent, monolithic at bent, monolithic at
top and basetop and baseAbutment Abutment
TypeType SeatSeat Stub Stub abutment/diaphragmabutment/diaphragm
FoundationFoundation Spread FootingSpread Footing PilePileExpansion Expansion
JointsJointsExpansion Bearings Expansion Bearings
& Shear Keys& Shear Keys Expansion Bearings Expansion Bearings
Force Force Resisting Resisting
MechanismMechanism
Longitudinal: Longitudinal: intermediate bents intermediate bents & free movement at & free movement at
abutmentsabutments
Transverse: Transverse: intermediate bent intermediate bent
columns & columns & abutmentsabutments
Longitudinal: Longitudinal: intermediate bents intermediate bents
and abutment backfilland abutment backfill
Transverse: Transverse: intermediate bent intermediate bent
columns and columns and abutment backfillabutment backfill
-1.0E-01
-5.0E-02
0.0E+00
5.0E-02
1.0E-01
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
rela
tive
dis
p._
x(ft
)
-6.0E-01
-4.0E-01
-2.0E-01
0.0E+00
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
6.0E-01
8.0E-01
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
rela
tive
dis
p._
z(ft
)
Column in Bent#3
Column in Bent#1
Column in Bent#1
Displacement Demand
-1.5E-02
-1.0E-02
-5.0E-03
0.0E+00
5.0E-03
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
axia
l re
lati
ve d
isp
.(ft
)
Tension
Bottom of Column in Bent#1
Structural Response of Structural Response of Bridge #8Bridge #8
Structural Response of Structural Response of Bridge #8Bridge #8
-2.5E+03
-2.0E+03
-1.5E+03
-1.0E+03
-5.0E+02
0.0E+00
5.0E+02
1.0E+03
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
axia
l fo
rce(
kip
)
-1.5E+02
-1.0E+02
-5.0E+01
0.0E+00
5.0E+01
1.0E+02
1.5E+02
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
shea
r fo
rce_
x(ki
p)
-8.0E+02
-6.0E+02
-4.0E+02
-2.0E+02
0.0E+00
2.0E+02
4.0E+02
6.0E+02
8.0E+02
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
shea
r fo
rce_
z(ki
p)
Bottom of Column in Bent#3
Top of Column in Bent#1
Force Demand
1986 N. Palm Springs Earthquake
Pre-test Component AnalysisPre-test Component Analysis Perform pretest simulations of test Perform pretest simulations of test
specimens with realistic loading and specimens with realistic loading and boundary conditionsboundary conditions Provide guidance for tests conductedProvide guidance for tests conducted Optimize number and parameters of test Optimize number and parameters of test
specimensspecimens Identify realistic loading and boundary Identify realistic loading and boundary
conditionsconditions Integrate various analytical models into the Integrate various analytical models into the
framework of UI-Simcor for pseudo-dynamic framework of UI-Simcor for pseudo-dynamic hybrid testinghybrid testing
Analytical ProgramAnalytical Program Development Inelastic Models for RC Sections Development Inelastic Models for RC Sections
under Combined Loadingunder Combined Loading
Modeling of Specimens tested under Pseudo-Modeling of Specimens tested under Pseudo-Dynamic/Dynamic ConditionsDynamic/Dynamic Conditions Complex and Simplified ToolsComplex and Simplified Tools
Parametric StudiesParametric Studies
Bridge System AnalysisBridge System Analysis
Development of Seismic Design CriteriaDevelopment of Seismic Design Criteria
Development Inelastic Models for RC Development Inelastic Models for RC Sections under Combined LoadingSections under Combined Loading
Deficiencies of Available Analytical Deficiencies of Available Analytical Models:Models:
Current Inelastic Frame software Current Inelastic Frame software Packages (e.g. OpenSees, Zeus-Packages (e.g. OpenSees, Zeus-NL, FedeasLab) focus on flexural NL, FedeasLab) focus on flexural behavior of RC members only.behavior of RC members only.
The combined The combined axial/shear/flexural/torsional axial/shear/flexural/torsional behavior is not considered in behavior is not considered in current models.current models.
Experimental ProgramExperimental Program
Experimental investigation of columns Experimental investigation of columns under multi-directional loadings with under multi-directional loadings with varying levels of axial force and axial-varying levels of axial force and axial-flexure interaction ratios linked to flexure interaction ratios linked to analysis.analysis.
Slow cyclic tests at UMR.Slow cyclic tests at UMR. Pseudo-dynamic tests at UIUC Pseudo-dynamic tests at UIUC Dynamic tests at UNRDynamic tests at UNR Integrated bridge test managed by Integrated bridge test managed by
UMR, tested at UIUCUMR, tested at UIUC
Position of (2) Horizontal Actuators. Actuators Position for S-Pattern loading
Test Unit (Interlocking Spiral Column Setup for Bi-Axial Bending Shown)
Loading Frame
Loading Frame Rotation Angle – Twist/Torsion
Test Unit Offset Angle for Bi-Axial Bending
UMR Test SetupUMR Test Setup
Shape Ht. Scale Design Directions Description
M01 - 24 108 1:2 High U, A1 Level 1axial-high shear-flexure(I01) (a)
M02 - 24 108 1:2 High U, T, A1 M01 with torsion (e) M05 - 24 108 1:2 High U, T, A1 M02 with high torsion (c) M06 - 24 150 1:2 High U, T, A1 high torsion (d) M07 - 24 150 1:2 Mod. U, A1 M01 with moderate details (b) M08 - 24 150 1:2 High T, A2 Level 2 axial-torsion (g) M09 - 24 150 1:2 High U, T, A2 Level 2 Axial (f) M10 -24x48 150 1:2 High U (m) Level 1 axial-low shear- (b) M11 -24x48 150 1:2 High U (M) M10 with bidirectional M (b) M12 - 24x48 150 1:2 High U, T (m) M10 with torsion (d) M13 - 24x48 150 1:2 High U, T (M) M11 with torsion (d) M14 - 24x24 108 1:2 High U Level 1 axial-high shear (a)
M15 - 24x24
108 1:2 Mod. U, T M14 with high torsion and moderate details (c)
M16 - 24x24
156 1:2 Mod. U, T M15 with high torsion and moderate details (d)
M17 - 24 - 24 - 24
144 156 108
1:2 1:2 1:2
High High High
Earthquake Prototype bridge evaluation – DONE AT UIUC by UMR.
Testing in June
UMR Test MatrixUMR Test Matrix
Large Testing Facility, Large Testing Facility, UIUCUIUC
Experiment Module
Static Analysis Module
UIUI--SimCorSimCor
Disp.Disp.
Forc.Forc.
Experiment Module
Static Analysis Module
UIUI--SimCorSimCor
Disp.Disp.
Forc.Forc.
Three 6 DOF loading and Three 6 DOF loading and boundary condition boxes of boundary condition boxes of capacity 3000kN to 4500kNcapacity 3000kN to 4500kN
Displacement capacity +/- Displacement capacity +/- 250 mm per box250 mm per box
Reaction wall ~15x9x8 Reaction wall ~15x9x8 metersmeters
Three advanced high speed Three advanced high speed DAC systemsDAC systems
Video and J-Camera data Video and J-Camera data capturecapture
Simulation Coordinator UI-Simulation Coordinator UI-SIMCOR for multi-site SIMCOR for multi-site hybrid simulationhybrid simulation
UIUC ExperimentUIUC Experiment MISST test (previous multi-site test at UIUC) will provide MISST test (previous multi-site test at UIUC) will provide
the test bed for the loading protocolsthe test bed for the loading protocols Tests of 3 large scale and 4 small scale bridge columns Tests of 3 large scale and 4 small scale bridge columns
with different aspect ratios and seismic design details with different aspect ratios and seismic design details using MUST-SIM Facilityusing MUST-SIM Facility
Column test with UMR under different loading conditionsColumn test with UMR under different loading conditions Verify local and global analytical part of the hybrid simulationVerify local and global analytical part of the hybrid simulation Provide an opportunity for researchers outside of a NEES Provide an opportunity for researchers outside of a NEES
facilityfacility Detailed design of UIUC and UNR experiments will be guided Detailed design of UIUC and UNR experiments will be guided
by bridge system analysisby bridge system analysis
Test at UIUC
Small Scale Test Large Scale Test Test with UMR
NEES-R
Small-Scale TestingSmall-Scale Testing Current testing Current testing
Several 1/16 scaled piers are currently being testedSeveral 1/16 scaled piers are currently being tested Used to evaluate system and material/pier designUsed to evaluate system and material/pier design
Test Setup After Test
UNR Shake Table FacilityUNR Shake Table FacilityPrevious Tests have Focused on Unidirectional Motion.
System of Decoupling the Vertical Load and Inertial Mass has been used.
Vertical Load was Held Constant.
A system will now be used to decouple variable axial load from the inertial load with bi-directional lateral shaking.
UNR ProgramUNR Program Shape Ht. Scale Design Directions Description
N01 - 16 104
1:3 High CA,E1,E2,T
Constant axial, low shear, torsion
N02 - 16 104
1:3 High VA,E1,E2,T
N01 but with variable axial load
N03 - 16 72
1:3 High CA,E1,E2,T
Constant axial, high shear, torsion
N04 - 16 72
1:3 High VA,E1,E2,T
N03 but with variable axial load
N05 - 12x20 72
1:4 High VA,E1,E2 Variable axial, high shear
N06 - 12x20 72
1:4 High VA,E1,E2,T
N05 with torsion
N07 - 12x20 72
1:4 High VA,E3,E4,T
N06 with near field motions
N08 - 12x20 72
1:4 High VA,E1,E2,T2
N07 with high torsion
Tested Structure
Soil & Foundation
Module
(OpenSees)
UI-UI-SIMCORSIMCOR
Disp.Disp.
ForceForce
Structural Module
(Zeus-NL)
UMR Test at UIUCUMR Test at UIUC
International CooperationInternational Cooperation
University of MexicoUniversity of Mexico Shape Ht. Scale Design Directions Description X01 - 20 x 20 80 1:1.2 High CA, U Strengthened prior
to testing X02 - 20 x 20 80 1:1.2 High CA, U X01 with second
repair scheme X03 - 20x80 120 1:2 High CA, U1 Bidirectional
Motion 1 X04 - 20x80 120 1:2 High CA, U2 Bidirectional
Motion 2
Educational ActivitiesEducational Activities UCIST shake UCIST shake
tables tables incorporated for incorporated for hands-on hands-on exercises and exercises and experimentsexperiments
Existing K-12 outreach programs will Existing K-12 outreach programs will be enhanced with additional modulesbe enhanced with additional modules UNR: Summer camps and ME2L programUNR: Summer camps and ME2L program UIUC: Engineering Open HouseUIUC: Engineering Open House UMR: High school engineering summer UMR: High school engineering summer
coursecourse WU: GK-12 ProgramWU: GK-12 Program
Educational ActivitiesEducational Activities
Modules to be developed to enhance Modules to be developed to enhance curriculum on undergraduate and graduate curriculum on undergraduate and graduate levelslevels
Undergraduates involved in research through Undergraduates involved in research through REU programsREU programs
Encourage students from underrepresented Encourage students from underrepresented groups through Minority Engineering groups through Minority Engineering Program, GAMES, MERGE, and GetSet Program, GAMES, MERGE, and GetSet programprogram
Online continuing education course to be Online continuing education course to be developed at UMR for practicing Engineersdeveloped at UMR for practicing Engineers