Upload
nataraja-upadhya
View
134
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
For more info, please contact Nataraja Upadhya at [email protected] Page 1
Negotiation Game – MonFinZen-Model-1 (15 Apr 2013)
A Background
Designed and played this simple yet very effective game for a recent summer workshop. It has been
played three different times since then, once with 4 teams, next with 3 teams and then with 6 teams. In
each instance, there was a clear winner.
Please feel free to use this game with modifications if necessary, but please do not claim this as your
own! For more details, you may please contact Nataraja Upadhya at [email protected]
B Objective
Teach the participants the art and science of negotiations through a real experience of negotiations
while playing a simple game that is an experience of fun and learning excitement.
C Approach
1. Divide the participants to a minimum of three or more teams.
2. Assign each team a fixed number (say 10) of objects of same color; the color varies from team to
team. Let us call the assigned colors as “native” colors.
3. Each team is required to interact with the other teams and exchange the objects assigned to
them with that of different color from the other teams.
4. At the end of all interactions, each team is given points per the following rules
a. No point at all for the remaining objects of native colors.
b. One point each for the objects collected from other teams in exchange.
c. One additional bonus point for each of the differential objects when a team collects
objects of same color more than that of the team for which the specific color was
assigned as native. The team which has less of the native colors compared to any
specific other team, will similarly attract negative mark for the differential.
d. A team can collect any number of bonus or penalty points with respect to its collection
of native colors against other teams.
e. For example, if team A was assigned 10 Green colors and ended with only 2 of them
while team B collected 5 of them and team C collected 3 of them, then the team B
collects 5 marks for the Green and additional 3 bonus points for having 3 extra objects
than team A for which Green was assigned as its native color. Team C collects 3 points
for the Green and also an additional 1 bonus point for having one more Green than
team A. Team A in this case will collect 3 penalty points due to team B and 1 penalty
point due to team C.
5. Track the results of each team at the end of each negotiation interaction to ensure audit and
data for debriefing.
6. Clearly debrief the teams on the objectives and winning strategy so that each team works very
hard to win.
For more info, please contact Nataraja Upadhya at [email protected] Page 2
7. Observe both the positive and negative behaviors of the teams and individuals during the
interactions to highlight the art and science of negotiations during the debriefing post game.
Highlight the best practices using the actual game experience.
8. Give at least one chance for each team to interact with every other team.
9. Keep the negotiation interaction private between the two teams. Use separate room for each
parallel interaction. The scoring observer needs to remain silent to ensure neutral influence on
the results of the negotiations.
10. Ask the teams not to reveal the status of their holdings with the other teams. Encourage all the
teams to share espionage information of other teams during interaction and at the same time,
warn them not to trust everything being said during the interactions.
11. If there is no clear winner after stipulated number of rounds, add an extra round of interactions
with or without the debriefing as to the current scoring status of each team.
D Case Study Sample
4 teams (Team A, Team B, Team C team D) were assigned the following colors. Each was given 10
objects of specific assigned colors.
Team A – 10 Yellow (10Y)
Team B – 10 Green (10G)
Team C – 10 Orange (10O)
Team D – 10 Black (10B)
Each team was asked to interact with the other teams for exchange. Each round of exchange totally
required 3 interactions across 4 teams. Totally 3 rounds of exchanges (9 interactions total) were
conducted to ensure ample negotiation experience for each team.
The negotiations interactions occurred privately in three distinct rooms with an observer to note the
results of interactions. Please note that the teams needed some practice to catch up with the winning
strategy.
The status of collections after each interaction in Round 1 is as follows:
Round 1 Interaction 1 Interaction 2 Interaction 3
Team A Y8G2
(With Team B)
Y5G2O2B1
(With Team C)
Y4G2O2B2
(With Team D)
Team B Y2G8
(With Team A)
Y2G7B1
(With Team D)
Y1G7O1B1
(With Team C)
Team C O8B2
(With Team D)
Y3O6B1
(With Team A)
Y4O5B1
(With Team B)
Team D O2B8
(With Team C)
G1O2B7
(With Team B)
Y1G1O2B6
(With Team A)
For more info, please contact Nataraja Upadhya at [email protected] Page 3
The native colors are shown in Bold. Please note that the Team A has been aggressive in collecting
colors from other teams.
The status of collections after each interaction in Round 2 is as follows:
Round 1 Interaction 1 Interaction 2 Interaction 3
Team A Y4G2O2B2 (No Deal)
(With Team C)
Y3G2O2B3
(With Team D)
Y4G2O1B3
(With Team B)
Team B Y1G6O2B1
(With Team D)
Y1G5O3B1
(With Team C)
G5O4B1
(With Team A)
Team C Y4O5B1 (No Deal)
(With Team A)
Y4G1O4B1
(With Team B)
Y5O5
(With Team D)
Team D Y1G2O1B6
(With Team B)
Y2G2O1B5
(With Team A)
Y1G3B6
(With Team C)
Please note that the Team A remains to be more aggressive in collecting colors from other teams.
Please note that one interaction went with no deal.
The status of collections after each interaction in Round 3 is as follows:
Round 1 Interaction 1 Interaction 2 Interaction 3
Team A Y4G2O1B3 (No deal)
(With Team C)
Y4G1B5
(With Team B)
Y4B6
(With Team D)
Team B G4O4B2
(With Team D)
G5O5
(With Team A)
G5O5 (No deal)
(With Team C)
Team C Y5O5 (No deal)
(With Team A)
Y5O5 (No deal)
(With Team D)
Y5O5 (No deal)
(With Team B)
Team D Y1G4B5
(With Team B)
Y1G4B5 (No deal)
(With Team C)
Y1G5B4
(With Team A)
Please note that three interactions went with no deal.
The results at the end of Round 3 are as follows:
Results Scoring Details Total Score Rank
Team A 6 for nonnative colors + 2 Bonus over Team D - 1 Penalty
over Team C
7 First; Winner!
Team B 5 for nonnative colors + No Bonus – No Penalty 5 Third
Team C 5 for nonnative colors + 1 Bonus over Team A – No Penalty 6 Second
Team D 6 for nonnative colors + No Bonus – 2 Penalty over Team A 4 Last
E Conclusions
1. This game is very simple to understand and play.
2. The winning strategy requires balancing aggression with defense here. It also requires
formulation of a winning strategy to target a particularly one team for its native colors collection
and at the same time a level of deception not to reveal its strategy and target.
For more info, please contact Nataraja Upadhya at [email protected] Page 4
3. The learning experience is significant while the joy and excitement prevails throughout the
game.
4. Recommend to play this game first, then debrief the game, spot the learning points, and only
then expand on the theory, winning techniques and losing behaviors.
5. After the class is fully educated on the art and science of negotiations, play the game again, and
debrief on the progress of teams due to learning and the challenges that still remain due to
behavioral issues and competition being tougher now!
6. As part of debriefing, have the teams do their debriefing first followed by the coach adding
additional observations and learning missed by the teams.