1
Average nestand nest Average nestand nest - - tree tree characteristics characteristics D istance to bole = 1.6 m (± 0.4) Supporting stem = 4.8 cm (± 0.4) DBH = 64 cm (± 11.4) Heightto crow n = 9 m (± 2.3) NestHeight = 14 m (± 2.3) Nest-tree height = 23 m (± 3.3) Nest-site selection and nesting success of band- Nest-site selection and nesting success of band- tailed pigeons tailed pigeons Katie Hughes 1 , Chris Kirkpatrick 1 , Courtney J. Conway 1 , and Jim deVos 2 1 Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Natural Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 86721; 2 Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ 85023 New Mexico Mexico Tucson Santa Catalina s Chiricahuas STUDY AREA Introduction Introduction Enormous flocks (Bendire 1892) of band-tailed pigeons (Patagioenas fasciata) are no longer observed and numbers have declined >3% per year since 1966 (Peterjohn et al. 1995). Band-tailed pigeons are considered game birds in most states, yet annual estimates of both hunter participation and number of pigeons harvested decreased by 87% between 1970 and 1996 (Pacific Flyway Study Committee 2001). Consequently, the band-tailed pigeon has been identified as a priority species for conservation at both the state (Latta et al. 1999) and national (National Audubon Society 2002) level. More information on the breeding biology and habitat needs of band-tailed pigeons are necessary to effectively determine the underlying causes of observed population declines (Fitzhugh 1970, Braun 1994). Questions Where do band-tailed pigeons nest? Do vegetative features differ surrounding successful vs unsuccessful nests? Does low reproductive success explain the declines? Results Results We radio-marked 32 males and 18 females and located 12 nests. During aerial surveys, we found 3 males up to 105 km from where they were trapped. Arizona Methods Methods Management Considerations and Future Management Considerations and Future Research Research Nests were more successful in burned areas (P < 0.019). Areas around successful nests contained more snags than areas around unsuccessful nests (P = 0.028). Additional studies are needed to further clarify the preferred nest-site characteristics of band-tailed pigeons, identify what factors are responsible for population declines, and what factors contribute to the low nesting success observed during this study. Acknowledgments Acknowledgments Project Funded by: Arizona Game and Fish Department’s Heritage Fund, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Webless Migratory Game Bird Program, United States Geological Survey, University of Arizona,T&E Inc. Aerial radio tracking: Thory Smith, Jim Heffelfinger, Sandy Lanham. Coronado National Forest. Assistance with field work: Clait Braun, Dave Fox, Eduardo Martinez-Leyva, Eric Nolte, Chuck Seal, Dominic LaRoche, Greg Gryniewicz, Kristin Hemmelgarn, Chris Murray, Julie Warr. Landowners: Mike Cooper, Linda Currin, Mike Stanley, Arthur Faul, Debbie Fagan, Susan Literature Cited Literature Cited Bendire, C. E. 1892. Life histories of North American birds with special reference to their breeding habits and eggs. U. S. Natural History Museum Special Bulletin 1. Washington D.C. Braun, C. E. 1994. Band-tailed pigeon. Pages 61-74 in T. C. Tacha, andC. E. Braun editors. Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Management in North America. Allen Press Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A. Fitzhugh, E. L. 1970. Literature review and bibliography of the band-tailed pigeon of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Arizona Game and Fish Commission Special Report, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Latta, M. J., C. J. Beardmore, and T. E. Corman. 1999. Arizona Partners in Flight bird conservation plan. Version 1.0. Arizona Game and Fish Department Technical Report 142, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Mayfield, H. 1961. Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bulletin 73:255-261. National Audubon Society. 2002. Audubon Watchlist. <http://www.audubon.org/bird/watchlist/index.html> Accessed 9 May 2006. Pacific Flyway Study Committee and Central Flyway Webless Migratory Game Bird Technical Committee. 2001. Pacific and central flyways management plan for the Four Corners population of band-tailed pigeons. Pacific Flyway Council, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. We measured 13 features associated directly with nests. We also measured 11 landscape and vegetation features within a 25-m radius of each band-tailed pigeon nest and at 30 randomly selected points located within the Santa Catalina Mountains. We used the Mayfield method (Mayfield 1961) to calculate daily survival probability and overall nesting success for band-tailed pigeons. We used t-tests, Watson’s U 2 , and stepwise logistic regression to determine which characteristics best distinguish nest (n = 11) Tucson O riginally caughtin Santa Catalinas Galiuros (45 km ) Rincons (40 km ) H uachucas (105 km ) Band Band - - tailed pigeons preferto nestin tailed pigeons preferto nestin areas w ith… areas w ith… Steeper slopes Steeper slopes M ore large trees (> 100 cm DBH) M ore large trees (> 100 cm DBH) More More silverleaf silverleaf oak cover betw een 2 oak coverbetw een 2 - - 5 m 5 m P < 0.0001 Nestsites Random sites Probability ofnestsuccess w as low Probability ofnestsuccess w as low 32% 32% 55 55 - - 73% 73% Nesting success (AZ) Nesting success (AZ) (CA and O R) (CA and O R) 32% 32% 55 55 - - 73% 73% Nesting success (AZ) Nesting success (AZ) (CA and O R) (CA and O R) Picture ofBTPI nest 0 1 2 3 4 5 Predation Weather Unknown Num beroffailed nests Nestin silverleafoak 1841 m

Nest-site selection and nesting success of band-tailed pigeons Nest-site selection and nesting success of band-tailed pigeons Katie Hughes 1, Chris Kirkpatrick

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Nest-site selection and nesting success of band-tailed pigeons Nest-site selection and nesting success of band-tailed pigeons Katie Hughes 1, Chris Kirkpatrick

Average nest and nestAverage nest and nest--tree tree characteristicscharacteristics

Distance to bole = 1.6 m (±0.4)

Supporting stem = 4.8 cm (±0.4)

DBH = 64 cm (±11.4)

Height to crown = 9 m (±2.3)

Nest Height = 14 m (±2.3)

Nest-tree height = 23 m (±3.3)

Nest-site selection and nesting success of band-tailed Nest-site selection and nesting success of band-tailed pigeonspigeons

Katie Hughes1, Chris Kirkpatrick1, Courtney J. Conway1, and Jim deVos2 1Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Natural Resources,

The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 86721; 2Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ 85023

New Mexico

Mexico

Tucson

Santa Catalinas

Chiricahuas

STUDY AREA

IntroductionIntroduction

Enormous flocks (Bendire 1892) of band-tailed pigeons (Patagioenas fasciata) are no longer observed and numbers have declined >3% per year since 1966 (Peterjohn et al. 1995). Band-tailed pigeons are considered game birds in most states, yet annual estimates of both hunter participation and number of pigeons harvested decreased by 87% between 1970 and 1996 (Pacific Flyway Study Committee 2001). Consequently, the band-tailed pigeon has been identified as a priority species for conservation at both the state (Latta et al. 1999) and national (National Audubon Society 2002) level.

More information on the breeding biology and habitat needs of band-tailed pigeons are necessary to effectively determine the underlying causes of observed population declines (Fitzhugh 1970, Braun 1994).

Questions

•Where do band-tailed pigeons nest?

•Do vegetative features differ surrounding successful vs unsuccessful nests?

•Does low reproductive success explain the declines?

ResultsResultsWe radio-marked 32 males and 18 females and located 12 nests. During aerial surveys, we found 3 males up to 105 km from where they were trapped.

Arizona

Methods Methods

Management Considerations and Future Management Considerations and Future ResearchResearchNests were more successful in burned areas (P < 0.019). Areas around successful nests contained more snags than areas around unsuccessful nests (P = 0.028). Additional studies are needed to further clarify the preferred nest-site characteristics of band-tailed pigeons, identify what factors are responsible for population declines, and what factors contribute to the low nesting success observed during this study.

AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments

Project Funded by: Arizona Game and Fish Department’s Heritage Fund, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Webless Migratory Game Bird Program, United States Geological Survey, University of Arizona,T&E Inc.

Aerial radio tracking: Thory Smith, Jim Heffelfinger, Sandy Lanham. Coronado National Forest. Assistance with field work: Clait Braun, Dave Fox, Eduardo Martinez-Leyva, Eric Nolte, Chuck Seal, Dominic LaRoche, Greg Gryniewicz, Kristin Hemmelgarn, Chris Murray, Julie Warr. Landowners: Mike Cooper, Linda Currin, Mike Stanley, Arthur Faul, Debbie Fagan, Susan Bensen

Literature CitedLiterature CitedBendire, C. E. 1892. Life histories of North American birds with special reference to their breeding habits and eggs. U. S. Natural History Museum Special Bulletin 1. Washington D.C.Braun, C. E. 1994. Band-tailed pigeon. Pages 61-74 in T. C. Tacha, andC. E. Braun editors. Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Management in North America. Allen Press

Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A.Fitzhugh, E. L. 1970. Literature review and bibliography of the band-tailed pigeon of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Arizona Game and Fish Commission Special Report, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.Latta, M. J., C. J. Beardmore, and T. E. Corman. 1999. Arizona Partners in Flight bird conservation plan. Version 1.0. Arizona Game and Fish Department Technical Report 142, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.Mayfield, H. 1961. Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bulletin 73:255-261.National Audubon Society. 2002. Audubon Watchlist. <http://www.audubon.org/bird/watchlist/index.html> Accessed 9 May 2006.

Pacific Flyway Study Committee and Central Flyway Webless Migratory Game Bird Technical Committee. 2001. Pacific and central flyways management plan for the Four Corners population of band-tailed pigeons. Pacific Flyway Council, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.Peterjohn, B. G., J. R. Sauer, S. Orsillo. 1995. Breeding bird survey: population trends 1966-92. In Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems (LaRoe, E. T., G. S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M. J. Mac, Eds.). U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, D.C.  

We measured 13 features associated directly with nests. We also measured 11 landscape and vegetation features within a 25-m radius of each band-tailed pigeon nest and at 30 randomly selected points located within the Santa Catalina Mountains. We used the Mayfield method (Mayfield 1961) to calculate daily survival probability and overall nesting success for band-tailed pigeons. We used t-tests, Watson’s U2, and stepwise logistic regression to determine which characteristics best distinguish nest sites from random sites, and successful vs. unsuccessful nests.

(n = 11)

Tucson

Originally caught in Santa Catalinas

Galiuros (45 km)

Rincons(40 km)

Huachucas(105 km)

BandBand--tailed pigeons prefer to nest in tailed pigeons prefer to nest in areas with…areas with…

Steeper slopesSteeper slopes

More large trees (>100 cm DBH)More large trees (>100 cm DBH)

More More silverleafsilverleaf oak cover between 2oak cover between 2--5 m5 m

P < 0.0001

Nest sites Random sites

Probability of nest success was lowProbability of nest success was low

32%32%

5555--73%73%Nesting success (AZ)Nesting success (AZ)

(CA and OR)(CA and OR)32%32%

5555--73%73%Nesting success (AZ)Nesting success (AZ)

(CA and OR)(CA and OR)Picture of BTPI nest

0

1

2

3

4

5

Predation Weather Unknown

Num

ber

of fai

led

nest

s

Nest in silverleaf oak 1841 m