Nestle - Zaka (103)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    1/16

    CASECASE UkraineUkraine

    www.case-ukraine.kiev.ua

    Corruption in Ukraine: Behind and Corruption in Ukraine: Behind and Beyond the Orange RevolutionBeyond the Orange Revolution

    Vladimir Dubrovskiy Vladimir Dubrovskiy

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    2/16

    Th e 2004 Transparency International CorruptionPerceptions Index

    CASE Ukraine

    114. Rep. of Congo 2.3Ethiopia 2.3Honduras 2.3Moldova 2.3Sierra Leone 2.3Uzbekistan 2.3Venezuela 2.3

    Zimbabwe 2.3122. Bolivia 2.2

    Guatemala 2.2Kazakhstan 2.2Kyrgyzstan 2.2Niger 2.2Sudan 2.2

    128 Ukraine 2.2129. Cameroon 2.1

    Iraq 2.1

    Kenya 2.1Pakistan 2.1 http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781359.html

    Out of 147 countries

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    3/16

    CASE Ukraine

    160 Liberia -0.86

    161 Moldova -0.86162 Niger -0.87

    163 Pakistan -0.87

    164 Sierra leone -0.88

    165 Kenya -0.89

    166 Ukraine -0.89167 Indonesia -0.90

    168 Papua new guinea -0.90

    169 Belarus -0.91

    170 Georgia -0.91171 Libya -0.91

    172 Kyrgyz republic -0.92

    173 Togo -0.92

    174 Djibouti -0.94

    175 Venezuela -0.94

    Control of Corruption (2004), Point Estimate

    Governance Matters IV:Governance Indicators for 1996-2004Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, andMassimo Mastruzzi

    The World Bank, May 2005

    Out of 204 countries

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    4/16

    CASE Ukraine

    Petty corruption: medicine, education, trafficenforcement .

    Corruption in state-business relations

    Embezzlement and abuses of procurement

    Extortion

    Just increase t h e salaries and improve t h e control

    Improve t h e transparency and control

    Bribing

    State Capture by Corrupt Networks

    CollusionKarklins,

    2002

    Hellman,1998

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    5/16

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    6/16

    CASE Ukraine

    Business Environment in Ukraine. IFC, Septamber, 2003

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    7/16

    CASE Ukraine

    Business Environment in Ukraine. IFC, December, 2004

    Corruption is perceived as a seriousimpediment for doing business

    w h ile t h e ot h er impediments are connected to it

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    8/16

    Institutional legacy (following Nort h; Putnam)

    The severity of the Russian laws is alleviated only by discretionin their enforcement just this disorder makes life in Russia

    possible

    Institutional memory of t h e former empire:Institutional memory of t h e former empire:

    Legislation is designed intentionally? in such a way that almostEVERYONE must become a lawbreaker

    Discretion is the only resort from such a total guilt

    E very business is subject to the authorities E very business is subject to the authorities

    CASE Ukraine

    Karamsin, 19th centuryRussian historian

    Gertzen, 19th century

    Russian social thinker

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    9/16

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    10/16

    F ACILITATES

    CASE Ukraine

    Legislation(flawed,

    ambiguous,impracticable)

    Corruption

    Discretion

    ENHANCES

    INTERES T INTERES T

    Decreasing t h e demand for improvements

    ALLEVIATESALLEVIATES

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    11/16

    Un controlled and mostly

    affiliated wit h business

    Strictly controlled and

    separated from business

    Possesses the political power tomagnify ambiguity and non-transparency in legislation

    No decision-making power Clear separation of powers frombranches of State

    Controls politicians rather than viceversa. Tries to control mass-media toavoid public scrutiny

    Operates under constant publicscrutiny and political oversight

    Poorly-paid and dependent uponadministrative rents in money or barter ) Relies upon discretionary power andvague and arbitrary informal rules

    Highly-paid professional publicservants facilitating rational processesof control.Implements legislation in a strictlyformal impersonal ) way

    Administrative power in

    Ukraine

    B ureaucracy (Weber)

    Officials: not a bureaucracy

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    12/16

    CASE Ukraine

    Consequences

    Inh ibited business selection t h roug h th eentry and exit

    Suppressed entrepreneurs h ip and F DI

    Distorted political representation

    Poor governance

    Misuse and misallocation of resources

    Hig h social costHig h social cost

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    13/16

    CASE Ukraine

    Business Environment in Ukraine. IFC, December, 2004

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    14/16

    Wh ith er captured state: a deadend?

    Business:

    a Milk caw or

    a Rent pumpfor officials

    Administrativepower:

    Providesprotection andpatronage for

    business

    Residual rig h tsof control

    Public:

    a passive player

    Sources of rent ; permissions

    Perceived totallycorrupted

    Perceived

    totally rent-seeking

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    15/16

    CASE Ukraine

    Public is not passive any more

    B UT

    Societal structures are persistent

    Authorities are committed to fight corruption seriously

    Legislation did not change significantly

    Executive power officials have lesser impact on the legislature

    As a result of t h e revolution:

    Political market emerges

    F urt h er closing of

    corrupt networks

  • 8/8/2019 Nestle - Zaka (103)

    16/16

    T hanks for T hanks for your attentionyour attention! !