Upload
nimesh-jain
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
1/21
Group 6- Ritabrata Bhaumik (2008044)
- Vivekanand Bollapinni (1012075)-Mekhala Govinda (2008036)
-Nimesh Jain (2008134)-Sheetal Gupta (2009059)
What is the Network Neutrality DebateReally About?By J. Gregory Sidak
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
2/21
e t w o r kN e u t r a l i t y ?
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
3/21
OK, So what's all the fussabout?
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
4/21
Is it ability to pay & willingness to pay?Payment for prioritized delivery of packets can be considered fair (Eg: Youtube)
Prioritization does not imply degradation (zero sum game)
Some Data Points
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
5/21
Some Data Points
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
6/21
Debate
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
7/21
Debate
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
8/21
What other say?
-Official Sponsor for Youtubelive streaming.-Offered 2 Mbps for Free
Google on Airtel :
We do not have any commercial arrangementwith Airtel for preferential access to YouTube or tothe IPLs channel. We did not ask for nor did weapprove of giving YouTube any preferentialtreatment. This is independent of their sponsorship
arrangement with us and is not a component of it.
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
9/21
What others Say?
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
10/21
What others say?
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
11/21
Recommendations!!
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
12/21
Questions
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
13/21
m p li ca t io n s fo r Re g ul a to r s
Making ex ante provisions can be socially costly a solution insearch of a problem
Consumer welfare maximization need to be carefully examined
& calibratedConvergence occurring among 2 very diff sets of players in
telecom & media that currently employ diff business models
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
14/21
Network Neutality
Advocates no restrictions by Internet
service providers or governments onconsumers' access to networks thatparticipate in the internet.
2 sided demand is a very important economic feature
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
15/21
, wabout?
SiliconValle
yCultu
re
>>Washingtonregulatory culture>> Welfare ofmarginal consumer- Policy instrument
(Price in a particularWay)>> NOT about censorship, ratherabout content and applications whichare bandwidth intensive>> Best Efforts approach ProhibitAccess Tiring>> Avoid Vertical Integration
s t h e r e a p o s s i b l e c o m m o n g r o u n d ?
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
16/21
Debate
For
Would allow end usercomplete control overthe content &
application that theyaccess.
Deep pocketed consumerswould be able to gain
access.
Two sided market analysis :Allowing networkprovider to charge more
would force consumer toa more.
Against
Maximize choice amongthe a constrained set ofapplications.
Consumers would choosethe service based onlevel of requirement.
Pricing flexibility allows torecover the cost ofbuilding additionalbandwidth and reduceeconomic burden borne
by end users.
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
17/21
Debate
For
Key to internetrevolution is
commitment toarchitecture thatdecouples contentand applicationproviders
Standardizationprovides pricecompetition &interoperability.
Innovation is best
Against
Would chill innovationas part of innovation
would be capturedby network provider.
Loss of product variety.
No protocol is
optimized for everyapplication.
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
18/21
FCCs contribution to NN
2005 classified broadband services as Title 1 informationservices, thereby subjecting them to a less rigorousregulatory framework
than those services classified as telecommunications services.
Issues Policy Statement, saying consumers are entitled to:
access the lawful Internet content of their choice. run applications and use services of their choice, subject to the
needs of law enforcement.
connect their choice of legal devices that do not harm the network.
competition among network providers, application and serviceproviders, and content providers.
* In Oct 2009 2 additional rules were passed:
- ISPs must not discriminate against any content or applications
- ISPs are required to disclose all their policies to customers. * On December 21, 2010, the FCC approved new rules banning cable
television and telephone service providers from preventing accessto competitors or certain web sites such as Netflix.
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
19/21
Google The Big Brother
Has supported net neutrality from the beginning
Jan 2010 Contract with IPL for live streamingon Youtube
August 2010 Google writes to TRAI pushing forNet Neutrality
October 2010 Google and Verizon submits jointfiling to FCC:
- Wireless carriers should be exempt fromthese strict net neutrality rules.
- Verizon agrees with tenets, but makesexception for future services.
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
20/21
8/4/2019 Net Neutrality Paper Group#6 v5 Nimesh
21/21
But Then
IPL2010
-Official Sponsor for
Youtubelive streaming.-Offered 2 Mbps for Free--
Google: We do not have any commercial arrangementwith Airtel for preferential access to YouTube or to theIPLs channel. We did not ask for nor did we approve ofgiving YouTube any preferential treatment. This isindependent of their sponsorship arrangement with usand is not a component of it.