Network Exchange Network Exchange Challenge GrantChallenge Grant

UIC Class II Data Flow:UIC Class II Data Flow:Montana, Mississippi, Alaska, Nebraska, Montana, Mississippi, Alaska, Nebraska,

North Dakota, Utah, North Dakota, Utah, and Californiaand California

April 25, 2007April 25, 2007Mark Layne/ALL Mark Layne/ALL ConsultingConsulting

AgendaAgenda

• Grant & IPTGrant & IPT• Current StatusCurrent Status• Experience of ProcessExperience of Process• Involved States Data Management Involved States Data Management

Systems (RBDMS)Systems (RBDMS)• Central Project NodeCentral Project Node• Application DevelopmentApplication Development• FutureFuture

Grant & State IPTGrant & State IPT

• Class II Primacy StatesClass II Primacy States• Challenge Grant to the State of Montana – Board of Challenge Grant to the State of Montana – Board of

Oil and Gas Conservation (Members: MT, AK, CA, Oil and Gas Conservation (Members: MT, AK, CA, NE, ND, UT & MS)NE, ND, UT & MS)

• MBOGC Chosen due to Favorable State Contract MBOGC Chosen due to Favorable State Contract Management (Low Overhead)Management (Low Overhead)

• Included two contractors – GWPC and ALL Included two contractors – GWPC and ALL ConsultingConsulting

• Formed own IPT Group and Joined EPA’sFormed own IPT Group and Joined EPA’s• GWPC – Management of Outreach, IPT and Node GWPC – Management of Outreach, IPT and Node

FundsFunds• ALL Consulting – Application Development & ALL Consulting – Application Development &

OutreachOutreach

Current StatusCurrent Status

• MT, AK, MS, NE, ND, UT – Logical MT, AK, MS, NE, ND, UT – Logical Mapping CompletedMapping Completed

• CA – In process of Development of DMS CA – In process of Development of DMS through separate effort (MS & OK)through separate effort (MS & OK)

• Montana – Focus as a test stateMontana – Focus as a test state– Physical Mapping, XML, In Application Physical Mapping, XML, In Application

Development Development

• Mississippi – Next for Physical MappingMississippi – Next for Physical Mapping

Experience of ProcessExperience of Process

• Challenges – Submission of UIC Summary Data Challenges – Submission of UIC Summary Data (How to use to gain National Picture)(How to use to gain National Picture)

• Concerns over how data to be interpretedConcerns over how data to be interpreted• Willing to meet and discuss concerns and try to Willing to meet and discuss concerns and try to

addressaddress• States decided to apply for Grant so that they States decided to apply for Grant so that they

could have cooperative effort with the Network could have cooperative effort with the Network Exchange effortExchange effort

• Consultants have acted as Middle MenConsultants have acted as Middle Men• Good working with IPT and having access to Good working with IPT and having access to

processprocess

States Data Management States Data Management SystemsSystems

• Risk Based Data Management System Risk Based Data Management System (RBDMS)(RBDMS)

• Application managed by the GWPC and State Application managed by the GWPC and State Stakeholders CommitteeStakeholders Committee

• DOE Top 100 projects (20DOE Top 100 projects (20thth Century) Century)• Current in-place in 22 Oil & Gas States and Current in-place in 22 Oil & Gas States and

with some success in other Classes of UIC with some success in other Classes of UIC WellsWells

• Core set of common UIC datasetsCore set of common UIC datasets• UIC Data Schema partially based on RBDMSUIC Data Schema partially based on RBDMS

Central NodeCentral Node

• Part of Proposal to House Central Part of Proposal to House Central Node at GWPC for member States to Node at GWPC for member States to Submit toSubmit to– States may have existing nodes but not States may have existing nodes but not

be located in same citiesbe located in same cities– Different Network configurationsDifferent Network configurations– Different PlatformDifferent Platform– Multiple DepartmentsMultiple Departments

• Control and make uniformControl and make uniform

Application DevelopmentApplication Development

• PlatformPlatform• Validation LocalValidation Local• Review Data PayloadReview Data Payload• Generate Payload & TestGenerate Payload & Test• Release Data to EPARelease Data to EPA

Application Development: Application Development: PlatformPlatform

• SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005– Mimic National UIC DBMimic National UIC DB

• Visual Studio Development 2005Visual Studio Development 2005– C # LanguageC # Language– WinForms ApplicationWinForms Application– Enterprise LibraryEnterprise Library

• IssuesIssues– Validation WSE 2.0 vs WSE 3.0 ProtocolsValidation WSE 2.0 vs WSE 3.0 Protocols– How to validate through own Node?How to validate through own Node?

Application Application Development: DataDevelopment: Data

Application Development: Application Development: Validation LocalValidation Local

• Validate Local Data for Accuracy Validate Local Data for Accuracy (RBDMS)(RBDMS)

• Validation Tool for SQL Server Validation Tool for SQL Server DatabasesDatabases

• Provides a means for Program Provides a means for Program Managers to review their data in Managers to review their data in familiar formatfamiliar format

Application Development: Application Development: Import and ValidateImport and Validate

Application Development: Application Development: Validate ReportValidate Report

Application Development: Application Development: Review PayloadReview Payload

• Provide for ability to review extracted dataProvide for ability to review extracted data• Provide ability to filter non-validated data Provide ability to filter non-validated data

from payloadfrom payload

Application Development: Application Development: Payload – Current Payload – Current

DevelopmentDevelopment• Develop XML PayloadDevelop XML Payload

– DoneDone

• SchematronSchematron• Review Schematron Validation Review Schematron Validation

(Repeat)(Repeat)• Review at UIC Data Store Review at UIC Data Store • Release Payload Dataset as Release Payload Dataset as

Validated SubmissionValidated Submission

FutureFuture

• Immediate:Immediate:– Discussion with Exchange Network Discussion with Exchange Network

Guru’s on Authentication ProcessesGuru’s on Authentication Processes– Complete Pilot of MT for IPT workgroupComplete Pilot of MT for IPT workgroup– Complete Physical Mapping of MSComplete Physical Mapping of MS

• Application available to all UIC Application available to all UIC Agencies and other Network Agencies and other Network Exchange members if desiredExchange members if desired

• Discussion on being 2.0 Node?Discussion on being 2.0 Node?

Contact InformationContact Information

Mark Layne, Ph.D., P.E.Mark Layne, Ph.D., P.E.

ALL ConsultingALL Consulting

mlayne@all-llc.commlayne@all-llc.com

www.all-llc.comwww.all-llc.com

QuestionsQuestions