Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
In This Issue
From Bob McBride, Principal
MAY 2010
NEWSLETTERto ParentsPrincipal’s Message
NEUQUA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL
Over the course of this school year, every Wednesday has been a late arrival for students. For Neuqua Val-ley High School teachers, however, Wednesday mornings have been an early arrival. Over the course of the school year, you might have wondered how our school and faculty were using this Wednesday morning time. This entire newsletter is devoted to sharing with you our professional development work this year. Every Wednesday, faculty members have been engaged in professional development and growth. As a school, we have committed ourselves to a specific professional development model, Professional Learning Commu-nities. The concept behind this model is simple. In each academic depart-ment, faculty members are organized as small teams. These teams focus on a critical course in the department, and the teachers on the team all teach that course. Rather than an episodic or accidental discussion of the course or the students taught in it, teachers meet weekly on Wednesday to examine stu-dent learning and shape their instruc-tion around it. Professional Learning Community teams focus on three critical ques-tions first developed at Stevenson High School in Lincolnshire, IL where much of the PLC concept first took form: What is it we want students to learn? How will we know they learned it? What will we do if they have not learned it? The idea behind these questions and the PLC concept is that teachers look
weekly for gaps in student knowledge and understanding, and they collaborate to develop ways of addressing these gaps. The work of our teacher teams is designed to build a collaborative environment around instruction, technology, and assess-ment. It is also designed to focus faculty members on learning as the litmus test for effectiveness in the classroom. So why organize teachers into teams? When students are learning and succeeding, it is easy to operate as a solo act in the classroom. But when students struggle, when they fall short, and when they don’t learn, that is when professionals rely on each other to ana-lyze what students need. The pages of this newsletter illumi-nate samples of Professional Learning Community work that our departments and teachers have completed over the course of this school year. Our teachers have followed a cyclical process of de-veloping professional norms for collabo-ration, assessing student strengths and weaknesses, setting goals for achieve-ment, and pursuing those goals through teaching. We are proud of the work we have produced this year, and we continue to focus our efforts on creating a school culture that aligns itself to what students need when they struggle and fall short of the learning goals we have for them.
Sincerely,Bob McBride
We believe in fostering a climate that
encourages learning & personal growth
MISSION STATEMENT
RESPECT your building . . . RESPECT your school . . . RESPECT yourself
Main Building
2360 95th Street
Naperville, IL 60564
630.428.6000
630.428.6001 fax
Freshman Building
3220 Cedar Glade
Naperville, IL 60564
630.428.6400
630.428.6401 fax
Principal’s Message | 1
PLC Diagram | 2
Sample Goal Statements | 3 from PLC Teams
Sample Areas of | 4 Focus and Work
Thoughts About the | 5 PLC Process
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
M
A
M
PLC Timeline
2
9
16
23
30
7
14
21
28
3
10
17
24
7
14
21
28
5
12
19
2
9
6
13
20
27
4
18
5
12
19
26
= First PLC Meetings: 6:55am hard start
Norms, Protocols & Commitments
Goals
Monitor & Collect Data
= First Day of School
3
10
17
24
Learning Fair - During AM and PM sessions, teams present to one another, sharing what they discovered about their students and themselves.
Establishing shared guidelines for decision-making, timeliness, and engagement respects the time and talent of your team.
Pre-Assessement
Strategic & SpecificMeasurableAttainableResults-orientedTime-bound
Developing strategies, instruments and tools to explore what students know and don’t know, what they can and can’t do, narrows a PLC focus.
A focus on learning is at the heart of the PLC process. SMART goals help keep us accountable to student learning.
A SMART GoalThe percentage of English I students scoring a 3 or better on the writing standards rubric will increase by the end of Semester I.
Not a SMART GoalStudents will improve their writing skills in English 9.
A SMART GoalBy the end of Semester I, 80% of all 2D art students will be able to demonstrate the use of line, shape, value, color and texture as measured by the 2D drawing rubric.
Not a SMART GoalStudents will improve their drawing skills in 2D Art.
Norms, Protocols& Commitments
Pre-Assessment
SMART GoalsMonitor andCollect Data
Reflection
Revise
PLC
Once you’ve developed what you’re going to collect and how you’re going to collect it, begin archiving that information and sharing it with your PLC.
PLC’s are an organic process bound by basic guidelines. Within those parameters, teams will move at different rates. For the first two months, we’re asking teams use the above calendar as a guide to govern the pace of their work. This collective commitment will set a foundation for successful experiences.
Professional Learning Communties require patience, leadership and communication. Working with colleagues builds our capacity to serve students and our confidence in the goals we set for them.
I
B A D
S I P
PLC Diagram
RESPECT your building . . . RESPECT your school . . . RESPECT yourself
Page 2
RESPECT your building . . . RESPECT your school . . . RESPECT yourself
Page 3
Sample Goal Statements from Professional Learning Community Teams To answer the question “What do we want our students to learn? Profes-sional Learning Community teams at Neuqua Valley set SMART goals at the beginning of the school. SMART is an acronym for goals that are Strategic, Measurable, Results-oriented, and Time-bound. These goals guided discus-sions about students, curriculum, in-struction, assessment, and educational technology. The goals provided a target for students and teachers and provided a focus. Teams set goals, revised them, reached them, and wrote new goals over the course of the year.
BuSINeSS
100% of the students will demonstrate an understanding of the stock market by effectively completing the stock market project. This will be shown by achieving a score of 80% or above on the summa-tive project as measured by the stock market rubric.
eNGLISh
70% of all junior Contemporary Litera-ture students will be able to correctly in-troduce, blend, properly cite, and explain quotations within their writing by January 14, 2010.
ForeIGN LANGuAGe
In Spanish I students will be able to earn a grade of 85% or better on weekly assessments that focus on subject/verb agreement by December 9th.
GuIDANCe
By the end of the 3rd quarter atten-dance will increase at academic re-source and classroom performance will improve for sophomore students who
have been recommended for academic resource and have not previously at-tended.
MATheMATICS
In Algebra 1 on summative exams dur-ing the current school year all students will achieve proficiency of 65% on commonly assessed topics and 71% in honors/AP courses.
MuSIC
By the end of the first semester, 75% of all woodwind, brass, and percussion stu-dents will be able to interpret rhythmic organization and identify the durational symbols within the context of a musical composition as measured by a multiple choice exam.
heALTh
90% of students will show improve-ment in their writing skills utilizing vo-cabulary terminology throughout the semester.
PhySICAL eDuCATIoN
75% of students by the end of the 1st Quarter will know all 12 muscle groups as shown on the quarter exam.
SCIeNCe
In Chemistry by the end of the second semester, the majority of students will show improved graphing and graphing interpretation skills as measured by the graphing rubric.
SoCIAL STuDIeS
In US History after collecting pre-as-sessment data we expect 75% of stu-dents to be able to write an average or above average thesis statement based on the prompt. n
SMART is an acronym for
goals that are Strategic,
Measurable, Results-ori-
ented, and Time-bound.
Measura
ble
Strategic
Results- Oriented
Time- Bound
Sample Areas of Focus and Work
Page 4
We focused on
creating the best
possible measures
of assessments for
student learning.
We reviewed and
revised assessments
that were already
in place.
Throughout the year, PLC teams se-lected specific areas of work in curricu-lum, instruction, assessment, or technol-ogy to work on pursuing their student goals. The following descriptions sum-marize how some teams approached their work week to week.
FroM BuSINeSS
“We analyzed each exam and em-bedded or altered related questions and stems to continually determine the level of mastery with regards to the four management functions. We dissected each question and tracked progress from each course section to compare and contrast mastery levels across our different teachers.”
FroM eNGLISh
“Across the board, students improved their writing skills and scores when these two groups of scores were com-pared. Some interventions or adapta-tions used included additional practice in class, reviewing examples, and addition-al practice with structure in study skills for students with IEP’s. These changes benefitted students because the first writing PLC study created further dia-logue.”
FroM FAMILy AND CoNSuMer SCIeNCe
“We focused on technical reading, vocabulary building, note taking, and summarizing. We believe that if students mastered certain strategies then it would improve their performances overall.”
FroM GuIDANCe
“We wanted students to learn how to take responsibility for their learning. The tools utilized were academic resource
opportunities and time management dur-ing option. The target group of students consisted of students that had one ‘F’ or more on the weekly progress report.”
FroM MATh
“We focused on creating the best pos-sible measures of assessments for stu-dent learning. We reviewed and revised assessments that were already in place. Based on the students’ scores on these assessments we were able to determine if they had reached our learning targets.”
FroM PhySICAL eDuCATIoN
“Using CPS as a test form has al-lowed us to collect data with all eight dance classes offered in PE. We have been able to compare what questions students struggled with and what areas students’ excelled in. Once we evalu-ated our questions, we made modifica-tions to tests as needed.”
FroM SCIeNCe
“We wanted to create a set of goals related to graphing skills. This goal is linked to the ACT. We designed a graph-ing assessment to evaluate the progress of their graphing skills, and we incorpo-rated graphing activities into each unit with varying difficulties.”
FroM SoCIAL STuDIeS
“We adjusted lessons and assignment for next year, as well as both formative and summative assessments. In the short term, we began utilizing CRISS strategies to help us achieve our goals. We didn’t necessarily adjust the pace, but rather improved upon what we were already doing to enhance our curriculum and help students be more successful
overall.” n
RESPECT your building . . . RESPECT your school . . . RESPECT yourself
Bob Mc [email protected]
Mark TruckenbrodAssociate PrincipalResponsibilities include oversight of Deans, Special Education, and Student [email protected]
Lance FuhrerAss’t. Principal for Curriculum & Instruction. Responsibilities include all academic programs at Main and Gold, School improvement initiatives, and professional development
Mark KolkmanAss’t. Principal for OperationsResponsibilities include oversight of classified staff, direction of buildings and grounds, facility use scheduling, budgeting, purchasing and [email protected]
Maree RussavageAssistant Principal Responsibilities include Lead Administrator at the Gold [email protected]
Tyrone SmithAss’t. Principal for Student Support. Responsibilities include coordinator of student programs, focused student intervention efforts, data assessment, and school/district equity [email protected]
Barb BarrowsAthletic [email protected]
Charles BibbsLead Administrator at [email protected]
Administration
Page 5
After our first year in this small
group learning structure, we are
currently working on revisions to
it and adjustments. The focus is
making the most of our time and
the most of our collaboration with
each other. The below comments
represent some of the reactions we
gathered about the Professional
Learning Community Team process:
“This year’s structure seems a
good balance between freedom and
mandate. Flexibility is needed and
appreciated. A somewhat flexible
deadline for SMART goal formation,
mid-year reflection and end-of-the
year summary is all that is needed.
The benefits of focusing on one
concept/course/goal are great. This
has led to very pertinent information
sharing, discussion, and discovery
for each of us – veteran and young
teachers alike.”
“A benefit of our PLC was being
able to focus on one specific course
with the same team members,
which allows us to keep a good
rhythm within one course. The only
drawback is that we do not spend
time on other courses that we teach
during that time.”
“In regards to the PLC structure,
we feel that less structure for next
year would be more beneficial to
our PLC work. We understand that
structure was needed, as this was
the first year of PLC work, however,
from here on out, we understand the
PLC process and cycle and can be self-
motivated and self-monitored.”
“The composition of our team, that
being directly focused on one compo-
nent of our department has enabled
the team to be exceedingly productive.
The more focus dictated to the PLC the
more potential it has of simply becom-
ing task driven and less productive. For
our PLC a semester-driven timeline
was appropriate. We should continue to
allow each department to decide how to
form and steer PLC’s. The make-up of
the PLC is what determines the direct
benefit to the students.”
“Weekly gives us a timely opportunity
to discuss and reflect upon our goals.
The current amount of time seems
appropriate although given the current
morning schedule we do sometimes
feel rushed and do not have the option
to continue the conversation because
of time constrictions. Having our PLC
focused on one course allows us to
build common expectations for our
course and uniformity in the way it is
presented.” n
Thoughts About the PLC Process
RESPECT your building . . . RESPECT your school . . . RESPECT yourself