Upload
david-walton
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection
Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.)
Erice201321 Sept., 2013
Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012) 053001, EPJC73 (2013) 2484
1
Outline
• Motivation and b asic idea• Model and its features Neutrino mass and mixing Dark matter Leptogenesis• Dark matter direct search• Summary
2
Motivation The SM is a successful model to explain various
experimental results. However, several recent experimental results require to extend the SM.
existence of neutrino masses existence of dark matter baryon number asymmetry in the Universe
We consider the extension of the SM on the basis of these experimental results.
3
Basic idea
• Dirac mass terms exist at tree level ⇒ right-handed neutrinos should be heavy enough. ordinary seesaw mechanism• Dirac mass terms are forbidden at tree level by some symmetry ⇒ small neutrino masses may be induced radiatively even for rather light right-handed neutrinos. radiative seesaw mechanism
origin of neutrino mass origin of dark matter
Neutrino oscillation data suggest neutrino masses arevery small : ( @Planck)
The same symmetry may guarantee the stability of some neutral particle (a dark matter candidate).
4
A radiative neutrino mass model
Field contents
• Lightest one with odd parity is stable ⇒ DM • No Dirac mass term
Z 2 invariant interaction and potential
Ma
is imposed to forbid Dirac neutrino masses at tree level.
5
Neutrino mass
New physics is expected in lepton sector at TeV regions.
Correction to the ordinary Seesaw formula
small neutrino masses are realized
even if masses of are
6
Dark matterTwo dark matter candidates :
Neutrino mass
Dark matter abundance
Lepton flavor violating processes
Neutrino Yukawa couplingsNew particle massesconstraint
7
(real part of neutral components)
⇒ LFV constraint might be easily evaded.
Two scenarios for dark matter
• If is DM, the neutrino Yukawa coupling should be to explain its relic abundance.
• If is DM, the neutrino Yukawa coupling could be irrelevant to the relic abundance of DM.
Ma, Kubo, D.S.D.S., Toma, Yoshida ⇒ LFV imposes severe constraints.
Barbieri, et al.Hambye, et al.…….
the neutrino Yukawa couplings could be small consistentlywith DM relic abundance.
8
Dark matter abundance
Freeze-out
DM abundance follows the usual thermal relic scenario.
It is determined by the number density at the freeze-out temperature TF.
In the DM scenario, there is
Dominant parts of annihilation cross section could be determined by the scalar quartic couplings . Hambye, et al.,
Longitudinal components of gauge bosons give large contribution.
coannihilation among
9
Relic abundance of
or required relic abundance is realized Neutrino Yukawa couplings are irrelevant to the relic abundance.
⇒ Neutrino Yukawa couplings could be small.LFV constraints are easily satisfied. 10
Re
lic
abu
nd
ance
Re
lic
abu
nd
ance
Constraints on
DM direct search gives such a constraint.
Inelastic scattering can contribute to the direct search experiments.
Since the direct search finds no confirmed evidence, the mass difference should be δ > 150 keV . Cui, et al.
Arina, et al.
Neutrino mass satisfies
Neutrino mass has to be considered under this constraints.11
Constraint on is crucial.
Determination of model parameters
can be diagonalized by tri-bimaximal mixing matrix
To explain the neutrino oscillation data, we just assume flavor structure of the neutrino Yukawa couplings :
12
Normal hierarchy
One mass eigenvalue is extremely small
13
For out-of equilibrium decay of in leptogenesis
solutions
An example of favored parameters
Region consistent withall neutrino oscillation data
14
q2
q3Contours of neutrino oscillationparameters in (q2,q3) plane
Fixed parametersDiagonalization of
Inverted hierarchy
One mass eigenvalue is extremely small
15
For out-of equilibrium decay of
solutions
An example of favored parameters
Region consistent withall neutrino oscillation data
16
Contours of neutrino oscillationparameters in (q1,q2) plane
q1
q2Fixed parameters
LeptogenesisLepton number asymmetry is expected to be generated through the out-of equilibrium decay of at TeV-scale.
Generated lepton asymmetry ⇒ smaller than the required value
Washout effects are large
17
Lepton asymmetry
CP asymmetry
Resonant leptogenesisTo suppress the washout effects, we can make neutrinoYukawa couplings smaller.
neutrino masses become smaller.
CP asymmetry becomes smaller.
This can be recovered by taking a larger
This can be recovered by assuming the nearly degenerate
18
However, there appear other effects.
⇒ TeV scale resonant leptogenesis
The required baryon asymmetry can be generated for
This degeneracy is rather mild compared with the ordinary case
Normal hierarchy Inverted hierarchy
Required degeneracy
19
Bar
yon
num
ber
asym
met
ry
Generated Baryon number asymmetry
Dark matter direct search
Inelastic scattering
Inelastic scattering occurs only if the DM velocity satisfies
It might be difficult to detect this DM through this process by Xenon1T.
required for the present Xenon100 bound has already exceeded
20
Two possible scattering processes
Escape velocity from our galaxy
Elastic scattering due to Higgs exchangeDM-nucleon scattering cross section
Excluded by Xenon100
Xenon1T cannot reach
Xenon1T could find this DM for the parameters which are consistent with other phenomenological constraints.
Xenon1T cannot reach
Xenon1T cannot reach
21
Promising parameter region in for Xenon1T
SummaryNeutrino masses and dark matter could be closely related each other. The radiative neutrino mass model by Ma gives a simple example for such an idea. There are noticeable phenomenological features. The model could explain neutrino oscillation data, dark matter abundance, baryon number asymmetry, simultaneously.The observed baryon asymmetry can be explained through resonant leptogenesis. However, the required mass degeneracy can be rather mild compared with the ordinary TeV scale resonant leptogenesis.Inert doublet DM could be found through the direct search experiment at Xenon1T for the parameters which could explain other experimental results consistently.
22