Upload
83jjmack
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
1/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
2/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 2 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
3/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 3 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
4/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 4 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
5/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 5 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
6/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 6 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
7/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 7 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
8/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 8 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
9/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 9 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
10/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 10 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
11/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 11 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
12/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 12 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
13/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 13 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
14/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 14 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
15/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 15 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
16/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 16 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
17/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 17 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
18/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 18 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
19/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 19 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
20/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 20 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
21/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 21 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
22/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 22 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
23/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 23 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
24/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 24 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
25/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 25 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
26/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 26 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
27/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 27 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
28/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 28 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
29/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 29 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
30/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 30 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
31/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 31 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
32/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 32 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
33/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 33 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
34/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 34 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
35/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 35 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
36/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 36 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
37/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 37 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
38/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 38 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
39/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 39 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
40/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 40 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
41/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 41 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
42/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 42 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
43/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 43 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
44/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 44 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
45/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 45 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
46/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 46 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
47/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 47 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
48/52
Case 3:11-cv-00135-RCJ -RAM Document 63-1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 48 of 48
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
49/52
Nevada AG Catherine Cortez Masto Destroys BofA in New Lawsuit
By: David Dayen Wednesday August 31, 2011 6:10 am
Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Mastos amended complaint in alawsuit against Bank of America has so many interesting nuances, I think Ineed a new Internet to catalog them all. But let me start by saying that thiscomplaint is a stick of dynamite to the foreclosure fraud settlement,exposing it as a useless whitewash that wont deter banks from theircriminal practices. Masto joins other skeptical AGs here in not acceding tosuch a dereliction of duty, and instead she lays out a thorough case ofsystematic fraud, in this case by Bank of America, at every step of themortgage process.First, the background. In October 2008, a group of twelve state AttorneysGeneral, including Nevada, entered into a settlement with Bank of America
over predatory lending at the mortgage lender Countrywide, which BofA hadpurchased in July. In the settlement, BofA promised to modify up to 400,000mortgages nationwide, at a cost of up to $8.4 billion. This was to includeprincipal reductions as well as refinancing, and all foreclosure operations onthe affected loans would be suspended.If any of this sounds familiar, thats because its the same basic structure forthe proposed settlement between all 50 AGs and leading banks over theirfraudulent foreclosure operations. The question looming over the entireenterprise was whether the states could ensure vigorous enforcement.Theres a model with this Countrywide settlement in 2008 that we can look
to. And apparently no AG but Catherine Cortez Masto has actuallyinvestigated whether or not BofA kept their promises. Turns out theyhavent. So Masto is seeking a pullout from the settlement, to pursueprosecution against the bank for multiple deceptive practices.Allow me to highlight the deceptive practices in question. This is going to bea somewhat long excerpt because I want to add as much detail as possible:In her filing, Ms. Masto contends that Bank of America raised interest
rates on troubled borrowers when modifying their loans even thoughthe bank had promised in the settlement to lower them. The bank also
failed to provide loan modifications to qualified homeowners asrequired under the deal, improperly proceeded with foreclosures
even as borrowers modification requests were pending and failed tomeet the settlements 60-day requirement on granting new loan
terms, instead allowing months and in some cases more than a year to goby with no resolution, the filing says [...]The complaint says the bankadvised credit reporting agencies thatconsumers were in default when they were not, and contends that
Bank of America employees deceived borrowers about why their
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
50/52
requests to modify loans were denied. In addition, it says, the bank
falsely claimed that the actual owners of loans had refused to allowchanges to their mortgages, and it incorrectly claimed that
borrowers had failed to make payments on trial loan modificationswhen in fact they had. Bank of America also misled borrowers, the Nevada
attorney generals filing noted, byoffering loan modifications with oneset of terms only to come back with a substantially different deal.Among the more troubling findings in the Nevada complaint is the contentionby several Bank of America employees that the companyimposed strict
limits on the amount of time they could spend on the phone assistingtroubled borrowers seeking help with their loans.One worker said in a deposition cited in the complaint thatemployeeswere punished if they spent more than seven minutes or 10 minutes
with a customer. Even though these limits allowed almost no time forassistance, Bank of America employees who did not curtail their
conversations were reprimanded, this employee said.This is a portrait of a criminal enterprise, and to anyone who thinks the othermortgage servicers are somehow more chaste than Bank of America, I havesome Bank of America stock to sell you.But Masto didnt stop there. She also pulled out a bazooka. Sheaccused BofA of failure to properly securitize mortgages, breakingthe chain of title and nullifying their standing to foreclose. This is
from the amended complaint:Bank of America misrepresented, both in communications withNevada consumers and in documents they recorded and filed, thatthey had authority to foreclose upon consumers homes as servicer
for the trusts that held these mortgages. Defendants knew (andwere on notice) that they had never properly transferred [text
redacted] these mortgage to those trusts, failing to deliver properlyendorsed or assigned mortgage notes as required by the relevant
legal contracts and state law. Because the trusts never became
holders of these mortgages, Defendants lacked authority to collector foreclose on their behalf and never should have represented they
could.We know that Countrywide didnt convey the mortgage notes properly to thetrust, their own officials testified to that in Countrywide v. Kemp (which is
quoted in the complaint). Masto joins Eric Schneiderman in blowing thewhistle on this corrupt securitization enterprise.The entire complaint is here. (Ive attached it...Chas) Masto is seeking civilpenalties of $5,000 per violation in the complaint, upping that to $12,000when the violation affected a elderly or disabled person. She also wantsrestitution costs for wrongful foreclosures and the costs incurred bymunicipalities and homeowners from unnecessarily vacant foreclosedproperties. Given that Nevada has so many foreclosures, the total liability
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
51/52
could range higher than the original $8.4 billion settlement, and thats justfor Nevada alone.So much else to say here. Mastos lawsuit is as much about the currentsettlement talks as it is about the 2008 Countrywide settlement. She issaying, in no uncertain terms, that you simply cannot trust the banks to
actually abide by settlement terms. As Masto says in the complaint, Bank ofAmericas misconduct cut across virtually every aspect of the Defendantsoperations, and they materially and almost immediatelyviolated theConsent Judgment agreed upon in the settlement. At the time, Jerry Brown,then Attorney General of California, said that the settlement would beclosely monitored and enforced in the months ahead. It clearly wasnt. BofAdidnt wait for the ink to dry before violating the terms. And Masto has notonly the accounts of borrowers to back this up, but also testimony fromBank of America employees.Knowing this, seeing it fully documented in Nevada, how could there still beany negotiations on a settlement with the same people? The negotiationshould be about whether there will be a public or private perp walk for BofAexecutives.So why hasnt any other state done the same basic investigation as Nevada,and sought to pull out of the Countrywide settlement? Arizona actuallyjoined this lawsuit back in 2010, but that was when Democrat Terry Goddardwas the AG. Republican Tom Horne became the AG after the 2010 elections,and hes too busy literally trying to overturn the Voting Rights Act to worryabout whether or not his constituents are being systematically ripped off bya bank, I guess. (Horne, by the way, is still on the executive committee ofthe foreclosure fraud settlement, I assume because he doesnt want to do an
investigation, and thats the prerequisite, it seems.)As for the others, let me tell you who one of the leaders on the Countrywidesettlement was: a guy named Tom Miller, the Attorney General of Iowa andthe leader of the 50-state settlement talks on foreclosure fraud. Heres whathe said at the time.Miller said the Countrywide agreements program of loan modifications to
prevent foreclosures is a win for all parties. Foreclosure is the enemy. Most
important, loan modifications can help homeowners avoid foreclosures andkeep their homes. Avoiding foreclosures also helps the companies, helps
communities and neighborhoods, and helps our overall economy by
stabilizing the housing market, he said.This is what we have been looking for. This agreement provides for the kindof systematic and streamlined loan modification program that is critical right
now, Miller said. I strongly urge other servicers to undertake similaraggressive programs to prevent foreclosures.Do you think Tom Miller, who wants a foreclosure fraud settlement in theworst way, is going to bother to check to see if BofA managed to actuallygive Iowans the loan modifications they promised? Of course not. And hes
8/4/2019 NEVADA AG MASTO PLANTS A STICK OF DYNAMITE UNDER THE PRIOR BANK OF AMERICA SETTLEMENT-LOANS WERE
52/52
likely to bully all the other states in the Countrywide agreement to shut upabout how that settlement was basically unenforced, because people wouldget the message that this new settlement would go the same way.He must have got to all of them, but not Masto. And she has ruined his bestwishes, not to mention the best wishes of Bank of America. They are
denying any wrongdoing and still claiming that the best way to get thehousing market going again in every state is a global settlement thataddresses these issues fairly, comprehensively and with finality. Bullshit.The best way to restore the housing market, the rule of law, and
faith in the American system is by rounding up criminal enterprisesmasquerading as banks.And the investigation that would lead to that will surely happen now. Masto,Schneiderman and colleagues like Beau Biden, Martha Coakley and anyoneelse who actually takes their job description seriously will ensure that.