24
New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA, Trieste Italy 3. Sincrotrone Trieste SCpA, Trieste Italy Mauro Melli 1,2 , Marco Lazzarino 1 , Matteo Castronovo 2,3 , Loredana Casalis 3 and Giacinto Scoles 2,3

New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches

1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy

2. SISSA, Trieste Italy

3. Sincrotrone Trieste SCpA, Trieste Italy

Mauro Melli 1,2 , Marco Lazzarino 1, Matteo Castronovo 2,3, Loredana Casalis 3 and

Giacinto Scoles 2,3

Page 2: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Outline

ssDNA hybridation Density The nanografting on a cantilever Cantilever as balance Experimental Setup Conclusion and Outlook

Page 3: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

ssDNA hybridization

Monolayer of single-stranded DNA (ss-DNA) have an important role in many biotechnology applications

The hybridization of self assembled monolayers (SAM) of ssDNA was found to be inversely proportional to the molecular density of the probes on the surface [Tarlov et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 8916 (1997) ]

Recently our group (E. Mirmomtaz, M. Castronovo, F.Bano, L. Casalis) has observed that grafted-ssDNA nanostructures even at high density hybridize

Disorder vs. density effects

Page 4: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Density DNA monolayer

Actually, in most cases nobody knows the REAL density of both a SAM and a grafted monolayer!!

The used technics are all indirect and different High and low density have no quantitative meaning Which is the most incontestable and direct way to misure the

density ?

weight directly the molecules

Page 5: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Cantilever as balance

Dinamic Resonance Mode For the first oscillation mode (vertical) a cantilever can

be approximated as a mass linked to a spring

where m* is the “effective mass” of the cantilever ad

k is given by (Y is the Young’s modulus)

k

m*

3

3

4 l

wtYk

Page 6: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Cantilever as balance

The resonance frequency is

If a mass is added to the free end of cantilever the resonance frequency changes according to

where is a geometric parameter <1

*0

2

1

m

kf

ff

mm

0

*2

mm

kmf

*2

1)(

Page 7: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Dna-patch by grafting

ssDNA patch are produced with alkanethiol-DNAmolecules on very flat gold substrate

Using nanografting an atomic force microscope (AFM) based lithography

The hybridization is monitored by measurements of heigth and compressibility with the AFM

Page 8: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

The Hybridization on a cantilever

Sensitive to DNA mass Geometry parameter (length, width,thickness) minimize

the mass and maximize the resonance frequency of cantiliver

The oscillation frequency should be in a accessible range

Allow grafting Stiff enough for grafting: k » k grafting (~ 0.6N/m)

Ultra flat gold surface (RMS < 1nm)

Page 9: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

The Hybridization on a cantilever

Sensitivity

1 base ssDNA -> 330 Da = 5.48•10-22 g 20 base ssDNA -> 6600 Da = 1.1•10-20 g

  Surface 9•10-8 cm2 (3x3m2) Max density 2.5 1013 molecules/cm2 2.25 106 molecules 2.48•10-14 g

10%-hybridation => 2.48•10-15 g

Page 10: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

The Hybridization on a cantilever

Cantilever 25x5x2.5(l•w•t(m))

f0 = 5,519,907 Hz

k = 213 N/m ·m*/f06.40·10-17 g/Hz =

5819 molecules/Hz

Cantilever 15x5x2.5

f0 = 15,333,075 Hz

k = 984 N/m ·m*/f01.38·10-17 g/Hz

= 1257 molecules/Hz

Page 11: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

The fabrication of cantilever

Cantilever fabrication is the results of several process steps (i.e., Lithographical process, Etching, Sacrifical layer release Superficial treatment)

Problems:– Microfabrication damages surfaces– Gold grows by islands on silicon

Page 12: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

The fabrication of cantilever

Cantilever fabrication is the results of several process steps (i.e., Lithographical process, Etching, Sacrifical layer release Superficial treatment)

Problems:– Microfabrication damages surfaces– Gold grows by islands on silicon

Solutions:– 200 nm of silicon oxide is grown on the starting wafer– Interface of palladium (10nm) between gold and silicon

Page 13: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Grafting on cantiliver

Page 14: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Grafting on cantiliver

Page 15: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Experimental Setup

Optical microscope to align the laser

s R T

Turbo Pump

x-y stage

laser

CCD

microscope

Network Analyzer

4-quad photodiode

Vibration actuated by a piezo element

Page 16: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Experimental Setup

Optical microscope to align the laser

s R T

Turbo Pump

x-y stage

laser

CCD

microscope

Network Analyzer

4-quad photodiode

Vibration actuated by a piezo element

Page 17: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Experimental Setup

Optical microscope to align the laser

s R T

Turbo Pump

x-y stage

laser

CCD

microscope

Network Analyzer

4-quad photodiode

Vibration actuated by a piezo element

Page 18: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Experimental Setup

Optical microscope to align the laser

s R T

Turbo Pump

x-y stage

laser

CCD

microscope

Network Analyzer

4-quad photodiode

Vibration actuated by a piezo element

Page 19: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Experimental Setup

Optical microscope to align the laser

s R T

Turbo Pump

x-y stage

laser

CCD

microscope

Network Analyzer

4-quad photodiode

Vibration actuated by a piezo element

Page 20: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Experimental Setup

Optical microscope to align the laser

s R T

Turbo Pump

x-y stage

laser

CCD

microscope

Network Analyzer

4-quad photodiode

Vibration actuated by a piezo element

Page 21: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

First Test

1st peak 2nd peak 3rd peak

Position (Hz) 4259210 4260850 4261990

Width (Hz) 966 1620 1620

Frequency

Page 22: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Outlook

Characterization of reproducibility Calibration with known mass Start a systematic analysis of DNA

hybridization

Page 23: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,

Bridge

Reduce mass without reducing significantly k

Sensible increase of sensitivity

Heat and set the temperature of the surface

Page 24: New approach for the determination of the hybridization efficiency of ssDNA nanopatches 1. CNR-INFM, Laboratorio Nazionale TASC, Trieste, Italy 2. SISSA,