23
New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation for Paper and EDC Studies: A Collaborative Perspective Shannon Labout, CCDM Senior Consultant PSDM Meeting 22-May-2008 Weesp, The Netherlands

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation for Paper and EDC Studies: A Collaborative Perspective Shannon Labout, CCDM Senior Consultant PSDM Meeting 22-May-2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation for Paper and EDC Studies: A Collaborative Perspective

Shannon Labout, CCDMSenior Consultant

PSDM Meeting22-May-2008Weesp, The Netherlands

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: Outline Introduction

Background

Example project

Collaboration Opportunities (discussion points)

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Background

Six Sigma methodology - DMAIC

Define – process improvement goals / defects Measure – how many? what does each one cost? Analyze – how will making an improvement reduce

defects/costs? Improve - implement the improvement Control – control the defects so they don’t occur

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Project Background

Project Assumptions and Scope Use existing technologies Limit project to evaluate

SAE collection / reporting process SAE data query process Process for delivering safety data to

statisticians

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

What is our Current Approach?

Collect SAEs using parallel processes - clinical and safety Separate entry process Separate data collection forms Separate query process

Reconciliation process is required Differences between databases Potentially different responses to queries

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

SafetySOPs

Serious?Record on

CRF

No

Yes

Report to SponsorWithin specifiedReporting period

Event enteredInto Safetydatabase

Event enteredInto Clinicaldatabase

Current Approach to SAE Reconciliation

ExpeditedReporting

Clinical data

CDMSOPs

Site recordsevent

Safety Query

Process

CDMQuery

Process

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Current Approach: Problems

SAE Reconciliation must be done as a separate process Two databases with the same data

Duplicate queries may be sent to the site Two organizations managing the same data

Safety – for PV and reporting Clinical – for analysis and submission

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Current Approach: Problems

SOPs not aligned between clinical and safety They work in “silos” May not even know what the other group is doing

Site is confused and frustrated Queries from two groups on same data

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Current Approach: Problems

Possible for events to be unreported in one system

Potential need for query responses to be reconciled

Time is lost managing duplicate processes and then cleaning up the mess

Costs are higher than they need to be

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

SafetySOPs

Serious?Record on

CRF

No

Yes

Report to SponsorWithin specifiedReporting period

Event enteredInto Safetydatabase

Event enteredInto Clinicaldatabase

Current Approach to SAE Reconciliation

ExpeditedReporting

Clinical data

CDMSOPs

Site recordsevent

Safety Query

Process

CDMQuery

Process

complex

duplicate work

not aligned

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Project Plan

Identified that we have a problem

What exactly is causing the problem, though? How do we fix it?

Need to gather some data and analyze

Methodology chosen: DMAIC

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Project – Define/Measure/Analyze/Improve/Control

Defect

An SAE term that must be manually reconciled

Clearly defined Measurable operational defect Includes all reconciliation activities (including

data entry verification)

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

How many defects (SAEs)? We can count them We can put a cost to each one

1000 SAEs per year

60 minutes to reconcile each one Data entry verification Query management Database reconciliation

$5/minute to do this work

Project – Define/Measure/Analyze/Improve/Control

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Project – Define/Measure/Analyze/Improve/Control

Determine the cost to the organization N*T*C = cost to the organization N = Number of defects T = Time to reconcile each defect C = Cost per time unit

1000 * 60 * 5 = $300,000 / year

What can we change that will improve this?

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

SafetySOPs

Serious?Record on

CRF

No

Yes

Report to SponsorWithin specifiedReporting period

Event enteredInto Safetydatabase

Event enteredInto Clinicaldatabase

Current Approach to SAE Reconciliation

ExpeditedReporting

Clinical data

CDMSOPs

Site recordsevent

Safety Query

Process

CDMQuery

Process

WHY are we enteringthis data twice?

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Project – Define/Measure/Analyze/Improve/Control

Decision to simplify the process Single data collection process Eliminates duplicate query process

What would the results be Number of defects potentially reduced Time to reconcile reduced (data entry verification,

simple verification, query resolution) to 15 minutes per SAE

Single query process (data only queried once)

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Project – Define/Measure/Analyze/Improve/Control

How much improvement?

N*T*C = cost to the organization

1000 * 15 * 5 = $75,000

$300,000 - $75,000 = $225,000 saved each yearEven if the number of defects remains the same

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Project – Define/Measure/Analyze/Improve/Control Align SOPs and WPGs between clinical and safety

Monitor the process with audits and documentation

TRAINING!

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

New Approach: Solutions

Enter data into only one system Databases do not have to be reconciled with each

other

Safety manages SAE queries, clinical all others No duplicate queries are sent to the site Time is gained by managing a single query

process Site has only one query process to deal with

Reduces site frustration and confusion

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

New Approach: Solutions

SOPs aligned between clinical and safety Collaboration Cooperation Communication Shared responsibility

High Quality – Lower ongoing costs – Better Timelines

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Serious?

Yes

Report to SponsorWithin specifiedReporting period

Current Approach to SAE Reconciliation

ExpeditedReporting

Clinical data

CDMSOPs

Site recordsevent

Safety Query

ProcessEvent entered

Into Safetydatabase

SafetySOPs

simplified aligned

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Discussion PointsOther Opportunities for Collaboration

Process mapping – find what is necessary, what is not:

Align processes across other internal groups Different regulatory requirements –must meet all needs Different organizational goals

PV – safety for all drug products Clinical – analysis and submission data Clinical – site, science, patient safety, informed

consent Shared training / cross training

Build understanding Build cooperation

New technologies / EDC and eSource

New Approaches to SAE Reconciliation: An Integrated Approach

Thank you!

Contact [email protected]

www.cssinformatics.com