24
FIG Working Week 2011 Bridging the Gap between Cultures Marrakech, Morocco, 1822 May 2011 1 FIG WORKING WEEK 2011, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011 New Design for Hydro Power Plant Structural Geodetic Monitoring Network Joël van Cranenbroeck, Director of Technology and Projects Development for Geodetic Monitoring Services GEOMOS AG, Switzerland – Heerbrugg Kaniv HPP Dniprodzerzhynsk HPP Dnipro HPP Dnister HPP Slide n° 2 /50 FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011 Hydro Electricity Hydroelectricity is the term referring to electricity generated by hydropower; the production of electrical power through the use of the gravitational force of falling or flowing water. It is the most widely used form of renewable energy. Once a hydroelectric complex is constructed, the project produces no direct waste, and has a considerably lower output level of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) than fossil fuel powered energy plants. Worldwide, an installed capacity of 777 GWe supplied 2998 TWh of hydroelectricity in 2006. This was approximately 20% of the world's electricity, and accounted for about 88% of electricity from renewable sources.

New Design for Hydro Power Plant Structural Geodetic ... · FIG Working Week 2011 Bridging the Gap between Cultures Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 1 FIG WORKING WEEK 2011, Marrakech

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 1

FIG WORKING WEEK 2011, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

New Design for Hydro Power Plant Structural Geodetic Monitoring Network

Joël van Cranenbroeck, Director of Technology and Projects Development for Geodetic Monitoring Services

GEOMOS AG, Switzerland – Heerbrugg

Kaniv HPP Dniprodzerzhynsk HPP Dnipro HPP Dnister HPP

Slide n° 2 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Hydro Electricity

Hydroelectricity is the term referring to electricity generated by hydropower; the production of electrical power through the use of the gravitational force of falling or flowing water.

It is the most widely used form of renewable energy.

Once a hydroelectric complex is constructed, the project produces no direct waste, and has a considerably lower output level of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) than fossil fuel powered energy plants.

Worldwide, an installed capacity of 777 GWe supplied 2998 TWh of hydroelectricity in 2006.

This was approximately 20% of the world's electricity, and accounted for about 88% of electricity from renewable sources.

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 2

Slide n° 3 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Selected and Placed (design) …

Every instrument on a project should be selected and placed to assist with answering a specific question : if there is no question, there should

be no instrumentation.

John Dunnicliff – Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Field Performance ( ISBN 0-471-00546-0 WILEY-INTERSCIENCE )

Slide n° 4 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Reasons to setup Geodetic Monitoring …

Hydro PP is a huge investment and must be maintained over years

There is a large trend to increase the power capacity (renewing the turbines is 15% increase ) with an impact of the structure ( vibrations )

Seismicity is a reality ( IRAN, CHINA, INDIA, … but also in UKRAINE )

New Hydro PP infrastructure must be monitored during the filling of the reservoir

We learnt out of the FUKUSHIMA disaster that a Nuclear PP needs also electricity to work …

Monitoring must be 24/7 and automatic …

Geodetic Monitoring can reduce significantly the number of Geotechnical sensors …

Geodetic Monitoring can be offset by Geotechnical sensors …

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 3

Slide n° 5 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Kruonio HAEDam Water Variations on Upper Reservoir

Geodetic Monitoring must be 24/7 … or the investment will be lost having no “results” !

Slide n° 6 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Wall Deflection vs Water Level on the upper reservoir

GMX2 0.0 mm

GMX3 0.0 mm

GMX1 +0.7 mm

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 4

Slide n° 7 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Wall Deflection vs Water Level on the upper reservoir

GMX2 +3.6 mm

GMX3 +3.4 mm

GMX1 0.0 mm

Slide n° 8 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

NIVEL210 Long Term MonitoringFluctuation on the Dam’s wall

∆∆∆∆MIN = 0.0 mm

∆∆∆∆MAX = + 3.2 mm

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 5

Slide n° 9 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Methodology The 7 seven steps approach …

1.Site visit and meeting with the Director of the HPP, engineers and surveyors

2.Site inspection and final Design

1. HPP infrastructure, surrounding environment

2. Selection of GNSS Reference Station location

3. Selection of TPS location

4. Location of the GNSS Monitoring stations with 360° reflector

5. Location of passive control points (360° reflector)

6. Visit to the control centre, processing facility

7. Report to partners on communication and accessories

3.Simulation on the final design proposal (Least Squares Adjustment)

4.Report delivered to the authority for approval

5. Planning on instruments and accessories delivering

6. Installation and initialisation (network processing)

7. Fine tuning and acceptance, contractual maintenance and support.

Slide n° 10 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the site and infrastructure

Existing Geodetic Assets Environment and location for

GNSS Reference & TPS

Understanding the structure

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 6

Slide n° 11 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the site and infrastructure

Existing Geodetic Assets Environment and location for

GNSS Reference & TPS

Understanding the structure

Slide n° 12 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the past Geodetic history (X,Y)

Previous Geodetic Monitoring Campaign executed by University, Geodesy Department using

GPS on pillars. Control points and monitoring points on red steel pillars anchored on massive

concrete foundations.

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 7

Slide n° 13 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the past Geodetic history (X,Y)

Previous Geodetic Monitoring Campaign executed by University, Geodesy Department using

GPS on pillars. Control points and monitoring points on steel pillars anchored on massive

concrete foundations.

Slide n° 14 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the past Levelling (H) history

Previous Levelling Monitoring Campaign executed by the surveyors of the HPP on a yearly

basis. Levelling benchmark anchored on stable foundation. Levelling operations will continue

using Digital Levelling instrument and Invar bars with software.

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 8

Slide n° 15 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

The original design of the structure and the construction are important elements to understand

the HPP structure and how it is supposed to behave under water load. The turbines and electro-

mechanical parts management for electricity production planning are influencing the way the

structure will react as well.

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the infrastructure

Slide n° 16 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

The original design of the structure and the construction are important elements to understand

the HPP structure and how it is supposed to behave under water load. The turbines and electro-

mechanical parts management for electricity production planning are influencing the way the

structure will react as well.

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the infrastructure

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 9

Slide n° 17 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the HPP Structural Behaviour

Slide n° 18 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the HPP Structural Behaviour

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 10

Slide n° 19 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the HPP Structural Behaviour

Slide n° 20 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

1. Site Visit and Meeting with HPP authority

Understanding the HPP Structural Behaviour

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 11

Slide n° 21 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Automatic Total Station

TM30

360°Reflector

Circular Reflector

GNSS Control Point

GNSS Reference

Station

INNOVATIVE PROPOSAL

GNSS and TPS mixed Network

Slide n° 22 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Active GNSS Control PointsConcept

For each GNSS stations (control points and reference ) a 360°reflector will be collocated with the antenna in order to be measured by the Total Stations ( Active Control Points ).

Antenna cable will be

protected by a resistant

coating against

vandalism.

GRZ121 360°Reflector

PRO. Reflector with 5/8”

thread adapter for

mounting of GNSS

antenna

Leica GNSS AR10 Antenna

(24 cm x 14 cm)

Stub to screw 5/8” adaptor

or stub support from the

mast top.

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 12

Slide n° 23 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Monitoring Leica Total Station TM30

Automatic Target Recognition of Angle, Distance

Slide n° 24 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Circular Prisms and location

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 13

Slide n° 25 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

WORKFLOW Post-Processing

TPS GNSS Base GNSS Control

∆∆∆∆X, ∆∆∆∆Y, ∆∆∆∆Z

Data Reduction T°, ppm

Store

Epoch of

ReferenceEpoch of Reference ?

Yes

No

S-TransformationStatistical Analysis

Deformation Analysis

Visualisation

Reporting, Archiving

Quality Analysis

Data Snooping, Filtering

Least Squares Adjust.

Minimum Constraints

Hz, Vz, Ds

Slide n° 26 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

The design must fit with structural analysis

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 14

Slide n° 27 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

The design must fit with structural analysis

Slide n° 28 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

GNSS and TPS location to insure accuracy

GNSS 2 and TPS 2 NIVEL

PASSIVE CONTROL

POINTS

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 15

Slide n° 29 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

GNSS and TPS location to insure accuracy

GNSS 1 and TPS 1 NIVEL

PASSIVE CONTROL

POINTS

Slide n° 30 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

Site survey using GNSS RTK

The site survey is an important operation consisting of validating the existing geodesy (coordinate

system), the designed location of instrumentation (GNSS and TPS) and to obtain information for

the final design validation using “Least Squares Simulation” processing.

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 16

Slide n° 31 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

Comparison and DatumTransformation

Slide n° 32 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

Site survey using TPS

The site survey with TPS is an important operation consisting of validating the designed location

of instrumentation (TPS and Reflectors), the performances on site and to obtain information for

the final design validation using “Least Squares Simulation” processing.

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 17

Slide n° 33 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

Site survey using TPS

Slide n° 34 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

2. Site Inspection and Final Design

Validation of EDM over Water

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 18

Slide n° 35 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

3. Simulation of Final Design Proposal

Least Squares Adjustment Simulation

Slide n° 36 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

3. Simulation of Final Design ProposalLeast Squares Adjustment Simulation

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 19

Slide n° 37 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

3. Simulation of Final Design Proposal

Least Squares Adjustment GNSS Simulation

Slide n° 38 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

3. Simulation of Final Design Proposal

Least Squares Adjustment TPS Simulation

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 20

Slide n° 39 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

3. Simulation of Final Design Proposal

Least Squares Adjustment Mixed Simulation

Slide n° 40 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

3. Simulation of Final Design Proposal

Relative Error Ellipse ~ 1mm

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 21

Slide n° 41 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

3. Simulation of Final Design Proposal

Reliability (marginal detectable error) ~ 1mm

Slide n° 42 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Sensors and Data Fusion

Rigorous Least-Squares Adjustment Analysis

Web distributor

Final Report

SQL DB’s

Results per epoch

Sensor Management Data Logger

Adjustment

SQL DB

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 22

Slide n° 43 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Least Squares Adjustment – Work Flow

GNSS + TPS Best Linear Unbiased Estimates

Free Network Adj. Weighted Constraint Fully Constraint

Data Snooping

Blunder Detection

Identify

Fixed Control

Points

NO FIXED POINTS ! MINIMUM FIXED POINTS !

Slide n° 44 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Least Squares Adjustment – Work Flow

Automatic Deformation Analysis

Epoch Reference ( any )

Epoch i

ixx xQ , ixx xQ ,

S-Transformation

∆x,∆y,∆z,rx,ry,rz

Residuals

Analysis

Deformation

on Object

points ?

Deformation

Reference

points ?

referencexx xQ , referencexx xQ ,

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 23

Slide n° 45 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Methodology The “Mock-up” approach

Slide n° 46 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Sketch of GNSS Reference Station and TPS Station monumentation

GNSS ANTENNA + 360°REFLECTOR

Automatic Leica TM30

CABINET

INSIDE

CONCRETE

STEEL MAST

FIG Working Week 2011

Bridging the Gap between Cultures

Marrakech, Morocco, 18‐22 May 2011 24

Slide n° 47 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Conclusion

Every instrument should be selected to answer a specific question !

Site reconnaissance and understanding of the structure is fundamental background to design a monitoring network

Site qualification and survey are mandatory

Least Squares Simulation allows the project engineer to check and improve the design to match the accuracy requirements

Geodetic Monitoring is the σ = 1 mm ( 95% ) market segment

“Eine Messung is Keine Messung” ( Karl Friedrich GAUSS )

The Marginal Detectable Error is one of the main criterion

Precision without Reliability is zero quality

Geodetic Monitoring is just … more than surveying !

Slide n° 48 /50FIG 2011, Working Week, Marrakech Joël van Cranenbroeck / 18.05.2011

Большое спасибо за внимание

Thanks for your attention