29
New Partners for Smart Growth January 27, 2006 Steve Kinsey Supervisor, Marin County Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Smart Growth in the Bay Smart Growth in the Bay Area: Area: The Intersection of Evolution & The Intersection of Evolution & Intelligent Design Intelligent Design

New Partners for Smart Growth January 27, 2006 Steve Kinsey Supervisor, Marin County Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Smart Growth

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

New Partners for Smart Growth January 27, 2006

Steve KinseySupervisor, Marin County

Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission

Smart Growth in the Bay Smart Growth in the Bay Area: Area:

The Intersection of Evolution & The Intersection of Evolution & Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design

San Francisco Bay Area counties

Million people; almost 4 million jobs

Public transit operators

Municipalities

Elected Transit Boards in US

MPO and COG

Joint Policy Committee

Many Paths toSmart GrowthMany Paths toSmart Growth

9

7

26

101

2 of the 3

Separate

New

25 yr Transportation Plan Expenditures

Expansion

Operations & Maintenance

SF Bay AreaTop 19 Metro Areas

Expansion

Operations & Maintenance

25 yr Transportation Plan Expenditures

Transit TransitRoads Roads

SF Bay AreaTop 19 Metro Areas

Smart Growth Started with Smart Growth Started with Flexibility Flexibility Smart Growth Started with Smart Growth Started with Flexibility Flexibility

Federal ISTEA law (1991) brought Federal ISTEA law (1991) brought

flexibilityflexibility STP - Surface Transportation Program

CMAQ - Congestion Mitigation Air Quality

TE - Transportation Enhancements

SB45 - CA state law that devolves funds to SB45 - CA state law that devolves funds to

regionsregions Why the sun always shines in California

Evolution of our Smart Growth WorkEvolution of our Smart Growth Work Transportation/Land Use Policy 1996 TLC planning 1997 TLC capital 1998 Housing Incentive Program 2000 Transit Expansion Plan 2001 Bay Area’s Smart Growth Vision

2002 Transportation/Land Use Platform

2004 Station Area Planning Grants 2005

Jim Spering Jim Spering Solano Solano CountyCounty

Evolution of Annual TLC FundingEvolution of Annual TLC Funding

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1997 1999 2002 2005

Year

Millions

of Dollar

s

Station Area Plans

HIP

County TLC

TLC capital

TLC planning

Funding OverviewFunding OverviewFunding OverviewFunding Overview

TLC Planning ($3M) 67 community-led plans

TLC Capital ($67M) 70 capital projects - 40 cities - $67 million

Housing Incentive Program ($40M) 57 housing projects

11,800 market rate bedrooms 4,800 affordable rate bedrooms

Regional Bike/Ped Program ($8M)

Fruitvale Transit VillageFruitvale Transit Village

One of first of new generation of Bay Area transit villages. Library, clinic, senior center, retail and 47 rental units in phase 1. Three hundred plus housing units in phase 2.

OaklandAlameda County

TLC planning: $47,000

TLC Capital Grant: $2 million

Fund Origin: TDA, CMAQ, TEA (TEA-21 federal funds)

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

HIP & TLC Project

PrometheusPrometheus

A multi-family development with 218 housing units located near bus transit and Caltrain station in downtown San Mateo

San MateoSan Mateo County

HIP Grant: $682,500

Source: STP funds

HIP Project

HIP grants funded pedestrian and streetscape improvements along Third and Fourth Avenues in downtown San Mateo (same project area).

Mahon PathMahon Path

New Class 1 bike and pedestrian path along an abandoned rail line adjacent to Mahon Creek that connects downtown San Rafael to a major transit center

San RafaelMarin County

Capital Grant: $550,000

Source: STP funds (TEA-21)

TLC Capital Project

The Bay Area’s Smart Growth VisionThe Bay Area’s Smart Growth Vision

Completed in 2002

First Vision in California

2,000 participants

Three scenarios offered

Medium density chosen

Not enough local govt buy-in but good start

The Bay Area in 2030The Bay Area in 2030

2 million more people -- 1.4 million more jobs

Trend Scenario Network of Neighborhoods

Smart Growth Requires Staying Smart Growth Requires Staying FlexibleFlexibleSmart Growth Requires Staying Smart Growth Requires Staying FlexibleFlexible

Evolution -- TLC/HIP Evaluation in 2004Evolution -- TLC/HIP Evaluation in 2004 Tightened eligibility for TLC projects to avoid “potted

palms”

TLC planning tied to more discrete outcomes & projects

HIP density thresholds raised - affordability incentive

increased

Desire for new land use planning funds for cities

Devolution -- Giving programs & $$ to countiesDevolution -- Giving programs & $$ to counties 1/3 of TLC/HIP funds devolved to counties

Lifeline program devolved to counties

3/4 of bike/ped funding devolved to counties

Smart Growth Includes Smart Growth Includes EveryoneEveryoneSmart Growth Includes Smart Growth Includes EveryoneEveryone

10 of last 11 TLC grants to low income areas

New EJ Principles Being Developed for MTC New Community-Based Transportation

Pgm State Transit Assistance (STA)

“Lifeline” funding from MTC JARC CMAQ State Transit Assistance (STA)

The Next Frontier:The Next Frontier:MTC’s new TOD policyMTC’s new TOD policyThe Next Frontier:The Next Frontier:MTC’s new TOD policyMTC’s new TOD policy

Conditioning Transit Expansion funds on land use $11 billion in new transit expansion projects Opportunity to leverage large regional investment Corridor wide housing targets

Five key Bay Area transit projects under policy BART extensions, Commuter Rail and Ferry expansion

Providing cities planning funds to change land use

New Station Area Planning Program $2.8 million for 8 cities in pilot cycle – Non Federal

Funds TOD part of “local match” for transit project

MTC’s TOD Policy:

Key Transit Corridors

Cost-Effective Transit & Land UseCost-Effective Transit & Land Use

BART/ Heavy BART/ Heavy RailRail

3850 housing 3850 housing units per stationunits per station

50-150 50-150 units/acreunits/acre

Light RailLight Rail 3300 housing 3300 housing units per stationunits per station

40-80 units/acre40-80 units/acre

Commuter RailCommuter Rail 2200 housing 2200 housing units per stationunits per station

20-50 units/acre20-50 units/acre

Express BusExpress Bus No density No density requirementsrequirements

No density No density requirementsrequirements

TOD: If we build it, will they ride?TOD: If we build it, will they ride? Percent using transit based on residential proximityPercent using transit based on residential proximity

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

<1/4mi 1/4mi-1/2mi

1/2mi-1mi

>1mi,Urban

>1mi,High-Sub

>1mi,Low-Sub

>1mi,Rural

Total

Key TOD Questions to be Key TOD Questions to be AnsweredAnsweredKey TOD Questions to be Key TOD Questions to be AnsweredAnswered

Fiscal disincentives for housing & mixed use

Fiscal incentives for big box retail Desire for lots of Parking How to streamline local development

review Attention to design & pedestrian-scale

Hayward

Richmond

San Jose

Dublin

www.mtc.ca.gov