New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool New Prague, MN

Facility Assessment and Project Study

- For -

New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool New Prague, MN

June 10, 2014

- By -

AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN

USAQUATICS INC.

AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool

Assessment and Project Study

June 10, 2014

Page 2

Executive Summary

Statement of Understanding

The City of New Prague owns and ISD #721 through its Community Education Department

programs/operates the existing municipal outdoor pool facility that is aging, the facility has a number of

operational concerns as well as a community / city concern for offering its pool users more facility amenities.

The existing outdoor facility only generates around half of the revenue required to stay operational. The

pools also have code and ADA compliance issues.

USAquatics first conducted an assessment of the existing municipal pool in 2009. Almost five years have

passed since the original assessment, and an updated study of this facility is clearly warranted to determine its

condition to date, and provide some options for renovation or expansion to serve the changing aquatic needs

of the community. The goal of this study is to aid in the making of important decisions concerning the

facility and its future, including options for expansion and adding amenities.

Assessment Process

Tom Schaffer and Ryan Johnson from USAquatics have completed an onsite evaluation of the existing

aquatic facility along with assistance from Maintenance Supervisor Glen Sticha, Operator Scott Warner and

Planning Director Ken Ondich. The purpose of the assessment was to determine the facilities condition and

usability to include record data from past seasons. In addition, a Community Survey has been created and

results will be reviewed and included as part of this Study.

Scope of Study

The scope of this study covers the following areas of the facility:

Swimming pool structure, recirculation, filtration, and sanitation equipment

Pool deck area, diving boards, features, etc.

Compliance with new Federal and State Main Drain Laws

Compliance with new Americans with Disabilities Act Laws

Attendance, revenues and expenses

Provide options for renovation/new facility

Provide possible location sites for a new facility

Study Criteria

The criteria used in our assessment include:

Previous assessment completed by USAquatics

Facility condition and other observable conditions

Facility code requirements and compliance

An understanding of cause and effect associated with various aquatic designs and operating

procedures as presented to us through the assessment, review, and design of several thousand aquatic

facilities

Study area demographics used in determining community aquatic needs

Study results of a Community Aquatics Survey

Intent of Report

The intent is to present a summary of needed improvements and added amenities including factors affecting

patron usage, revenue potentials, and expenses associated with the operation and management of the aquatic

facility. The goal is to provide stake holders with the necessary information to make informed decisions

regarding the future of Aquatics in New Prague.

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 3

Summary

Based on discussions with staff, a physical assessment of the existing outdoor facility, analysis of the existing

condition and evaluation of the community survey at the New Prague Municipal Pool Facility, USAquatics

has determined that the facility warrants a large number of improvements and expansion to better serve the

needs of the community. Several amenity options for the expansion of the outdoor pool facility have been

provided for consideration. These amenity options provide a range from repairing the existing outdoor

facility, renovation and expansion to an entirely new facility.

The main pool offers a very small variety of aquatic amenities including 1-meter diving, lap lanes, walk out

stairs and varying water depths to meet some of the community’s aquatic needs. This pool would be costly to

expand as any aquatic program expansion to the pool would require larger filtration, recirculation and water

treatment systems, as well as, major changes to the pool structure.

The wading pool is undersized to adequately serve the younger patrons of New Prague, as well as the growing

demand for an accessible zero depth beach type entry body of water. This pool would also be costly to

expand due to filtration and recirculation requirements. It would be far more cost effective to demolish the

existing wading pool and construct a new zero depth entry pool complete with a wide variety of amenities

geared toward younger children.

Neither pool meets requirements for ADA accessibility. Due to the size of the main pool, two means of ADA

ingress/egress are required of which the primary entrance needs to be a ramp or zero-depth entry. It should be

noted, the main pool having two means of ingress/egress for ADA was not a requirement at the time of the

previous assessment. A fixed ADA lift was ordered in May of 2014. There is a sizeable added expense to

make both pools ADA accessible.

The main cost difference from the original assessment and budget estimate to the current preliminary cost

estimate is simply inflation in construction costs since 2009 and current trends we have seen on outdoor

aquatic projects. Additionally, the earlier assessment was done on the pool and did not include bathhouse

work or associated costs. This study includes options and estimated pricing for expanding the current facility

and adding amenities such as play features, a climbing wall and waterslide – which were not part of the 2009

assessment. Regenerative media is shown as the replacement for the current sand filters as opposed to the

prior assessment replacing sand with sand.

The facility as a whole does not provide an appropriate aquatic venue for a community the size of New

Prague. The facility is too small in relation to the New Prague area demographics. Any proposed aquatic

facility solution should take into account the City demographics that show a high percentage of youth and

young families. We recommend the expansion of program elements to serve the New Prague aquatic

community. The aquatic expansion should also provide a secondary service area of approximately a 15-30

mile radius. Given the growth and size of New Prague, the current pool site may not be the best location to

service the community as a whole and alternative locations should be considered. The following is a list of

possible options for the future of the existing outdoor pool facility:

o Option – 1: Close the existing outdoor pool. This would mean swimming lessons would no longer

be offered in New Prague. The bathhouse, pools and decks would be demolished and removed.

Utilities would be capped. The voids would be filled in and sod/seed placed over to create a lawn

area. The current City subsidy would no longer be required. Patrons of the existing pool would

travel elsewhere for lessons, recreation, etc.

Estimated cost range: $47,400 - $55,200

o Option – 1A: Close the existing outdoor pool. Same as above; however, the bathhouse and utilities

would remain. The bathhouse could be utilized for other purposes (ex: baseball, etc.)


USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 4

o Option – 2: Repair Existing. Make only the recommended repairs to the existing pools and facility to

address operational issues, concerns and code issues including accessibility. This Option would not

expand the facility or add any aquatic play elements. The wading pool would be modified to 600 s.f.

splash pool and would include a zero-depth entry for accessibility. The coping brick around both

pools would be removed and a new poured concrete edge installed. Both pools would receive a new

epoxy paint finish. New pumps/filters would be installed along with associated piping. Decks would

be selectively demolished and replaced as needed. This Option would create little if any increase of

operational costs and revenues. The City subsidy would still be required to assist with operational

expenses. Attendance would remain at current levels while decreasing slowly.


o Option – 3: Renovate and Expand Existing. Make necessary repairs to the existing main pool and

demo and remove the existing wading pool. Install a larger 1,200 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool

more appropriate sized to meet the needs of the community. This Option would include the addition

of a climbing wall to the main pool and making necessary adjustments to the pool to allow for a

waterslide to be installed in the shallow-end of the main pool. Shade structures would be added

around the deck area. The coping brick around the main pool would be removed and a new stainless

steel gutter with grating installed. Both pools would have a new quartz aggregate plaster with

ceramic tile accents installed. New pumps/filters would be installed along with associated piping

necessary for the new gutter recirculation system. All decks would be replaced. This Option would

make for increased operational costs due to replacing the wading pool with a larger splash pool, as

well as the addition of a waterslide. Adding aquatic features and amenities may increase attendance

and revenue; however, the City subsidy would continue to be needed for operation. Attendance

would increase with this Option; however, numbers would drop off after the first few years.

Estimated cost range: $1,434,220 - $1,593,960

o Option – 4: Spray Pad/Wet Deck. The existing pools would be demolished and back-filled in. A

new 800-1,000 s.f. Spray Pad/Wet Deck would be constructed on the current site. The Spray

Pad/Wet Deck would be complete with pump/filter and recirculation system including piping.

Several spray features and interactive play features would be included. With this option, overall

attendance would decrease as this Option only targets the younger age groups. Operational expenses

would decrease due to less staffing being required, less water to treat with chemicals, etc. With this

option there would be little to no revenue generated as typically facilities of this type charge no

admission. The operational subsidy would decrease.

Estimated cost range: $491,400-$558,600

o Option – 5: New Aquatic Facility. This Option would allow for the existing facility to remain open

for use during construction of a new facility. The new facility would be appropriately sized to meet

the needs of the community while providing a wider range of aquatic amenities that better reflects the

demographics of New Prague. A new facility would also be designed to accommodate for future

growth and could potentially be located on the Armory site. No preliminary design work has been

completed; however, a City the size of New Prague could support a facility with an estimated total

project cost of around $4-$5 million.

Estimated cost range: TBD

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 5

Table of Contents

SECTION ONE: ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................. 6

Main Pool ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Recirculation System ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Pool Equipment - General ............................................................................................................................... 6 Pump .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Heater ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Pool Filter ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Flow Rate ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Chemical Control ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Wading Pool .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Wading Pool Recirculation System .................................................................................................................. 8 Wading Pool Heater ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Wading Pool Pump .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Wading Pool Filter ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Wading Pool Chemical Control ........................................................................................................................ 8 Bathhouse ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Concessions..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Deck Area ........................................................................................................................................................ 9

SECTION TWO: OPTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 10

Option – 1 (Close outdoor pool) .................................................................................................................... 10 Option – 1A (Close outdoor pool – Bathhouse remains) ................................................................................ 10 Option – 2 (Repair Existing) ........................................................................................................................... 10 Option – 3 (Renovate and Expand) ................................................................................................................ 12 Option – 4 (Wet Deck/Spray Pad).................................................................................................................. 14

SECTION THREE: EXISTING FACILITY ............................................................................................... 16

Facility Layout ............................................................................................................................................... 16 2014 Admission Rates ................................................................................................................................... 17 2013 School Expenditures ............................................................................................................................. 17 2013 City Expenditures.................................................................................................................................. 17 Revenue vs. Expense (2013-2007) ................................................................................................................. 17 Revenue vs. Expenses ................................................................................................................................... 18 Census Information ....................................................................................................................................... 19 2010 Attendance Information ....................................................................................................................... 20 Existing Facility Photographs ......................................................................................................................... 21

SECTION FOUR: PRELIMINARY DESIGN ............................................................................................ 25

Option – 3 Renovate & Expand Existing Facility ............................................................................................ 25 Option – 4 Spray Pad/Wet Deck .................................................................................................................... 26 Option – 5 New Family Aquatic Center .......................................................................................................... 27

SECTION FIVE: NEW AQUATIC FACILITY ANALYSIS...................................................................... 28

APPENDIX A: EXISTING POOL DATA .................................................................................................. 29

APPENDIX B: 2010 COMMUNITY EDUCATION PLANNING SURVEY RESULTS ...................... 30

APPENDIX C: 2014 COMMUNITY SURVEY ........................................................................................ 30

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 6

SECTION ONE: ASSESSMENT

Main Pool

The main pool was built in 1983 and opened the following summer in 1984. The main pool consists of a 6-

lane lap pool with attached deep water diving well, as well as multi-use area. Pool depths vary from 3’-6” at

the shallow end to 12’-0” at the diving well. The diving well has two 1-meter diving boards. The 1-meter

diving boards are in fair condition

Since the pool perimeter is in excess of 300 feet, two means of ADA compliant access are required. Currently

the Main Pool does not provide any means of ADA access. We recommend the addition of a “fixed” ADA

lift to account for one means of access. In order to be compliant with ADA access requirements the primary

means of access into the pool must be a ramp or beach type zero depth entry, which would account for the

second means of access. It should be noted a fixed ADA lift was ordered in May and will be installed upon

arrival.

The Main Pool has very limited amenities for recreational aquatic activity, educational aquatic needs and

aquatic fitness. The pool vessel is in poor shape and a large crack, which appears to be located at the

construction cold joint, spans across the lap area. The main pool has been patched numerous times over the

years and continues to require additional work. There are several areas of spalling where the paint finish is

flaking off leaving bare concrete exposed. In addition, the ceramic tile in the pool and waterline tile is

coming off in several locations and all areas of ceramic tile are in need of grout replacement.

Due to the existing conditions of the main pool epoxy paint finish, we recommend sand blasting the shell to

sound concrete, and the troweling of quartz aggregate plaster with ceramic tile accents. This would also be a

longer lasting pool finish.

The coping brick surrounding the entire Main Pool is in extremely poor condition. The bricks have become

brittle with age and are cracking and breaking off in pieces or completely. This is a safety issue for patrons as

the broken coping bricks are left with several sharp edges which can easily cut feet or hands.

Overall, the main pool lacks the aquatic needs of the New Prague aquatic community.

Recirculation System

The Main Pool has surface skimmers rather than a gutter system, which would be ideal for a pool of this size.

Based on Aquatic industry standards, pools wider than 30’ or over 2,000 square feet should have a gutter

system that allows for skimming around the entire perimeter. Several of the existing skimmers are either

missing weirs or have broken weirs. In addition, the federal Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act

(VGB) requires certified grate covers over the skimmer equalizer lines. At the time of the assessment none of

the equalizer lines had covers; however, covers have since been installed.

The Main Pool is in compliance with the State of Minnesota Abigail Taylor Pool Safety Act (ATA), which

protects patrons from entrapment in pool suction openings. VGB requires all pool grates to be tested and

stamped compliant with ANSI A112.19.8-2007. The current grate covers were stamped in 2008 and should

be replaced prior to the 2015 swimming season.

Staff reported 2-3 broken pipe locations over the past few years that led to concrete decks settling. Those

pipes were repaired; however, there is still suspicion that there are leaks within the recirculation piping.

Pool Equipment - General

The pool equipment is largely original to the facility with a few exceptions. The equipment met the needs of

the community; however, for the most part it is outdated and inefficient in terms of operation. A number of

the valves are cast iron, rusting, and not holding their seal. Valves should be replaced with non-metallic

valves designed for pool use.

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 7

Pump

The main pool pump is a horizontal pump located above water level which can make priming and servicing

difficult. The existing pump is in poor condition and is very inefficient. A vertically mounted high efficiency

pump with a premium motor installed below water level would solve priming difficulties and provide higher

efficiency during operation. The current size and layout of the mechanical room does not allow for a recessed

pump pit. In addition to a new pump located in a pump pit, we recommend adding a variable frequency drive

to the motor. This provides significant energy cost savings and efficiency while extending the life of the

pump and reducing maintenance.

The pump strainer is original to the facility and is poor condition. It is cast iron and is badly rusted. Strainers

of this age and condition become very difficult to open and close properly and have limited capacity. We

recommend replacing the strainer at the same time the pump is replaced. It should be replaced with a non-

metallic strainer with a clear lid and large strainer basket.

Heater

The main pool has is serviced by a large Raypak natural gas fired heater. This heater was installed in 2013.

Staff reported no issues or concerns with this equipment.

Pool Filter

The existing sand filter is original to the 1984 construction of this facility. As noted in the prior assessment,

due to its age and condition, this filter poses a number of concerns and operational issues. The filter is

constructed of mild steel and is completely covered in rust. Often times the interior of these tanks are in even

worse condition and the integrity of the tank is of concern. The pressure gauges noted in the earlier report as

not functioning properly have been replaced.

According to the operator, the pool is backwashed on Monday, Wednesday and Friday during the regular

swimming season. Backwashing should only take place when required based on pressure differential. As

long as flow rates are met, backwashing the filter should be kept to a minimum to save on water, chemicals

and heat. In addition, the filter sand has not been looked at in at least the past 17 years. Typical filter sand

media should be replaced every 3-5 years. The pool filter also lacks the air gap to waste that is required. The

valves on the face piping do not work properly due to age and corrosion.

We recommend the installation of new regenerative media filters that are more efficient, take up a fraction of

the current footprint, and are green friendly using 1/50th of the water used by traditional sand filters. In

addition, replacing the existing sand filters with regenerative media filters would allow for more ‘open space’

in the mechanical room to service other equipment. Although we recommend regenerative media filters, we

will provide filter replacement options for both regenerative media filters and traditional sand filters.

At a minimum, if the filter is not replaced - the manholes should be removed and the filter sand should be

inspected. The sand media should be loose with no clumping or hard top coating.

Flow Rate

The required flow rate for the Main Pool based on the maximum allowed 6-hour turnover is 584 gpm. Due to

the facility being closed at the time of the inspection, we were unable to verify the current flow rate. The

prior assessment noted the flow rate at 450 gpm; however, the accuracy of the flow meter was in question. It

is possible the original design flow rate was greater than a 6-hour turnover. Additionally, the 6-inch suction

pipe is limited to 529 gpm by code. The suction pipe should be sized at 8” to allow for full flow suction.

Chemical Control

The chemical control system is a Strantrol System 3. This controller is outdated technology and inadequate to

meet the needs of the facility. We recommend a new, user-friendly, web-based chemical controller that can

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 8

reduce operational and maintenance issues. This new technology also allows operators the ability to access

and control settings remotely.

Wading Pool

The Wading Pool is square in shape and located adjacent to the main pool. The wading pool depth varies

from 1’-0” to 1’-6”. There is a 3ft. chain link fence as a barrier separating the wading pool from the rest of

the facility. As was the case with the Main Pool, the coping brick is in poor condition, with several cracks

and broken pieces.

The Wading Pool lacks any interactive features or water play elements and is not sized appropriately to

service the younger demographics of the New Prague community. The wading pool also lacks any form of

ADA access. The Minnesota State Department of Health now requires all wading pools to have a zero-depth

entry. Due to the size, depth and condition of the Wading Pool – we have determined that renovating it is not

a viable option. We recommend demolishing the wading pool to allow for a larger splash pool with a zero

depth entry. At a minimum, we recommend replacing the coping brick as needed or utilizing a form to pour a

new coping as a short term solution.

Wading Pool Recirculation System

The Wading Pool has one surface skimmers located on a side wall. The Wading Pool has four inlets and a

single main drain. The Wading Pool main drain is compliant for State and federal law; however, due to

standing water in the pool at the time of inspection we were unable to verify the date on the grating. It is

assumed the grate cover was purchased at the same time as the Main Pool cover meaning it is due for

replacement.

Wading Pool Heater

There is no heater on the wading pool. Heated shallow water is the #1 or most commonly asked for amenity

for aquatic facilities. We recommend the addition of a heater that is adequately sized to handle loads required

for a new splash pool.

Wading Pool Pump

The Wading Pool is serviced by one pump, a 1.5HP high-rpm pump that is located above water level. This

pump is aging and very inefficient. This pump handles recirculation with suction from the main drain and

skimmer. As with the Main Pool pump, a vertically mounted high efficiency pump with a premium motor

installed below water level would solve priming difficulties and provide higher efficiency during operation.

Based on our recommendation to completely replace the existing wading pool, a new zero depth splash pool

would require a new pump to handle the increased volume. At that time we recommend installation of

vertical mount high efficiency pump in a recessed pump pit below water level, with a premium motor and

variable frequency drive.

Wading Pool Filter

The sand filter dedicated to the Wading Pool is a Triton TR-100, which is a smaller residential style filter that

has likely exceeded its life expectancy. Since the previous assessment, the multi-port valve has been replaced

and staff reported no issues with the filter. It was unknown when the sand was last replaced. As noted

earlier, sand media has an average life expectancy of 3-5 years and should be replaced.

Wading Pool Chemical Control

The chemical control system is a Strantrol System 3, the same as is used on the Main Pool. Again, this

controller is outdated technology and inadequate to meet the needs of the facility. We recommend a new,

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 9

user-friendly, web-based chemical controller that can reduce operational and maintenance issues. This new

technology also allows operators the ability to access and control settings remotely.

Bathhouse

The bathhouse is in fair condition for its age. The bathhouse had been modified recently to include a

chemical storage addition on the south end of the building. The change rooms and shower facilities are also

in fair condition; however, ADA accessibility is an issue and the building lacks appropriate ADA toilets and

shower amenities. In addition, multiple showers are not allowed to have a single drain point. The current

layout has the appropriate number of fixtures based on patron bather load: two urinals, two toilets and three

sinks in the Men’s locker room and the Women’s has four toilets and three sinks. The women’s change room

has two private change booths that have partitions. The hot water heater for the showers is undersized to keep

up with the demand required.

Current trends show a need for family change rooms that allows for a parent or guardian to keep young

children of either sex with them, rather than sending them into a locker room alone or bringing them into a

locker room of the opposite sex. To remedy this, we recommend the addition of two family style change

rooms. Other current trends for bathhouses include a central entrance from curbside to pool side with change

rooms on one side of the entry and admissions, staff and concessions on the other side of the entry. This

results in better control of users with minimal staffing.

Concessions

The current bathhouse configuration has the main entry area doubling as a concession area which is not very

effective and lack of space is an issue. The current layout and amenities allows for a very limited number of

products to be sold. A permanent dedicated concession area complete with a three compartment sink would

be more efficient and allow for increased serving options such as pre-packaged food, etc. This is also an

option that would allow for the facility to increase its revenue.

Deck Area

The majority of the deck area surrounding the Main Pool and Wading Pool is in good condition. There are a

few areas around the diving well where shifting and settling has created a number of raised areas or “toe

stubbers”. Sinking of slabs and extensive cracking has been caused by pipes leaking under deck along the

south side of the Main Pool. The sunken deck areas should be replaced after compacting fill underneath.

Several depth markers located around the Main Pool are missing the notation for inches. Code requires that

water depths be plainly marked in feet AND inches. The Wading Pool lacks any depth marking notation. If

the Wading Pool is not replaced, depth marking should be added.

The surrounding fence has a few spaces where gaps between posts and between mesh and concrete deck

exceeds the maximum allowed. Vinyl coated fence is preferred for aquatic facilities as it is more aesthetically

pleasing and has a longer life expectancy. The gate into the Wading Pool area must be self-closing, latching

and capable of being locked. The fence mesh should be adjusted as needed, as well as spacing between posts.

A self-closing mechanism should be installed on the Wading Pool gate.

The facility offers a small amount of shade and minimal table seating that allows patrons to stay longer which

would result in additional revenue. We recommend the addition of several shade structures around the pools.

Lighting for recreational swimming is required to be 10-foot candles and 30-foot candles for training and

competition. Light readings were not taken as the inspection occurred during the day. We recommend

reviewing lighting levels when lights are on, at least 1-hour after sunset.

The deck along the east side of the Main Pool has starting block anchors; however, State Health Code

requires a minimum pool depth of at least 5ft. Currently, starting blocks are not installed – and should not be

unless new anchors are installed where depth requirements are met.

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 10

SECTION TWO: OPTIONS

Option – 1 (Close outdoor pool)

Demolition

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to prepare for closing the

facility:

Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool, and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $22,000

Demolition of non-reusable Mechanical/Equipment Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000

In-fill existing pools Probable cost estimate: $3,000 - $4,000

Demo Bathhouse & Cap existing utilities Probable cost estimate: $9,000 - $10,500

Seed/sod lawn area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,500

Subtotal: $39,500 - $46,000

Soft Costs (20%) $ 7,900 - $ 9,200

Estimated Demolition Cost Range: $47,400 - $55,200

Option – 1A (Close outdoor pool – Bathhouse remains)

Demolition

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to prepare for closing the

facility:

Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool, and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $22,000


In-fill existing pools Probable cost estimate: $3,000 - $4,000


Subtotal: $30,500 - $35,500

Soft Costs (20%) $ 6,100 - $ 7,100


Option – 2 (Repair Existing)

Main Pool

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the main pool area:

Install new main drain covers prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500

Replace missing/damaged skimmer weirs Probable cost estimate: $700 - $800

Demolition of decks and installation of ADA access ramp along west side of pool Probable cost estimate: $70,000 - $80,000

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 11

Replacement of damaged brick/coping, form pour new edge (353’) Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $18,000

Re-paint pool floor Probable cost estimate: $14,000 - $15,000

Cold joint repair around entire pool perimeter Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000

Replace missing ceramic tile Probable cost estimate: $1,800 - $2,200

Re-grout all pool tile Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,000

Subtotal: $112,000 - $126,900

Soft Costs (20%) $ 22,400 - $ 25,380

Estimated Main Pool Repair Cost Range: $134,400 - $152,280

Wading Pool

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the wading pool area: For

this option we recommend select demolition of the existing wading pool to allow for a zero-depth entry splash

pool, poured concrete coping with no additional above ground features:

Select demo of wading pool and removal of decks needed for zero-depth entry area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,000

Modify wading pool to into 600 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool with imbedded ground sprays Probable cost estimate: $100,000 - $115,000

Replacement of damaged brick/coping, form pour new edge Probable cost estimate: $3,800 - $4,200

Install new splash pool heater Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,500

Re-paint pool floor Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500

Install new main drain cover prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $500 - $750

Subtotal: $ 114,300 - $131,950

Soft Costs (20%) $ 22,860 - $ 26,390

Estimated Wading Pool Repair Cost Range: $137,160 – $158,340

Mechanical/Equipment

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the pool equipment:

New pump strainer Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000

Replace pool pump with vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motors and vfd Probable cost estimate: $13,000 - $14,000

Replace existing sand filters with regenerative media filters Probable cost estimate: $72,000 - $80,000

Construct pump pit Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $18,000

Update equipment room piping and valves Probable cost estimate: $10,000 - $12,000

Backwash standpipe Probable cost estimate: $1,600 - $1,800

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 12

Subtotal: $116,600 - $131,800

Soft Costs (20%) $ 23,320 - $ 26,360

Estimated Mech. Repair Cost Range: $139,920 - $158,160

Bathhouse

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend any work for repair of the Bathhouse.

Modify bathhouse, shower & toilets for proper ADA access Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $17,000

Adjust shower area/drains to meet code requirements Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000

Subtotal: $ 20,000 - $23,000

Soft Costs (20%) $ 4,000 – $ 4,600

Estimated Bathhouse Repair Cost Range: $24,000 - $27,600

Site

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the site area:

Select demo and removal of sunken/extensively cracked deck, compact fill and pour new Probable cost estimate: $11,000 - $12,500

Adjust fencing as needed, add-on to fencing around zero depth area & install self-closing gate Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $4,500

Subtotal: $ 15,000 - $17,000

Soft Costs (20%) $ 3,000 – $ 3,400

Estimated Site Repair Cost Range: $18,000 - $20,400

Option – 2 Total Estimated Cost Range: $471,480 - $516,780

Option – 3 (Renovate and Expand)

Main Pool

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for renovation and expansion of the

main pool area to include added amenities and features:

Install an aquatic climbing wall on side of the diving well. Installation of gutter cup anchors and rope

& float to be included Probable cost estimate: $36,000 - $38,000

Install new main drain covers prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500

Replace missing/damaged skimmer weirs Probable cost estimate: $700 - $800

Demolition of decks and installation of ADA access ramp along west side of pool Probable cost estimate: $70,000 - $80,000

Demo & remove coping, installation of new stainless steel perimeter gutter and surgetank Probable cost estimate: $190,000 - $210,000

Prep surface & install new quartz aggregate plaster finish with ceramic tile accents Probable cost estimate: $85,000 - $95,000

Cold joint repair around entire pool perimeter

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 13

Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000

Replace missing ceramic tile Probable cost estimate: $1,800 - $2,200

Re-grout all pool tile Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,000

Demo pool as needed for waterslide run-out Probable cost estimate: $6,000 - $6,500

Install waterslide, tower and related piping, etc. Probable cost estimate: $185,500 - $200,000

Subtotal: $585,500 - $645,000

Soft Costs (20%) $117,100 - $129,000

Estimated Main Pool Expansion Cost Range: $702,600 - $774,000

Wading Pool

Based on our review and analysis, we have determined it is not feasible or cost effective to attempt to repair

or renovate the existing wading pool. For this option we recommend the demolition of the existing wading

pool, and installation of a new larger splash pool with embedded sprays and several additional above ground

features:

Demo and remove existing wading pool Probable cost estimate: $4,500 - $5,500

Construct new 1,200 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool complete with interactive play features &

quartz aggregate plaster finish Probable cost estimate: $265,000 - $290,000

Installation of new 3’ fencing to replace existing Probable cost estimate: $1,500 - $2,000

Install new splash pool heater Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,500

Subtotal: $276,500 - $304,000

Soft Costs (20%) $ 54,200 - $ 60,800

Estimated Wading Pool Renovation Cost Range: $330,700 - $364,800

Mechanical/Equipment

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the pool equipment:

New pump strainer Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000

Replace pool pump with vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motors and vfd Probable cost estimate: $13,000 - $14,000

Replace existing sand filters with regenerative media filters Probable cost estimate: $92,000 - $110,000

Construct pump pit Probable cost estimate: $18,000 - $20,000

Update equipment room piping and valves Probable cost estimate: $10,000 - $12,000

Backwash standpipe Probable cost estimate: $1,600 - $1,800

New slide vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motor Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $23,500

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 14

Subtotal: $159,600 - $187,300

Soft Costs (20%) $ 31,920 - $ 37,460

Estimated Mech. Repair Cost Range: $191,520 - $224,760

Bathhouse

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for renovation and expansion of the

bathhouse area:

Reloconfigure bathhouse to create a dedicated concession area facing the pool deck to include

required amenities needed for pre-packaged food service/sales. Probable cost estimate: $27,500 - $30,000

Add two family change rooms complete with bathroom/showers on to existing bathhouse. Probable cost estimate: $76,000 - $80,000

Modify bathhouse, shower & toilets for proper ADA access Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $17,000

Adjust shower area/drains to meet code requirements Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000

Subtotal: $123,500 - $133,000

Soft Costs (20%) $ 24,700 - $ 26,600

Estimated Bathhouse Renovation Cost Range: $148,200 - $159,600

Site

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for the renovation and expansion of the

site area:

Demo and remove all decking, install new decking properly sloped to new deck drains. Probable cost estimate: $25,000 - $30,000

Addition of six shade umbrellas around site Probable cost estimate: $21,000 - $23,000

Adjust fencing as needed, install new fencing around waterslide tower, zero depth area & install self-

closing gate Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000

Subtotal: $ 51,000 - $59,000

Soft Costs (20%) $ 10,200 - $11,800

Estimated Site Renovation Cost Range: $61,200 - $70,800

Option – 3 Total Estimated Cost Range: $1,434,220 - $1,593,960

Option – 4 (Wet Deck/Spray Pad)

Pool Demolition

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to allow for the site to be

prepared for a new Spray Pad/Wet Deck:

Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $24,000 - $26,000


In-fill existing pools

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 15

Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000


Subtotal: $35,500 - $40,500

Soft Costs (20%) $ 7,100 - $ 8,100


Spray Pad/Wet Deck

Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to allow for the site to be

prepared for a new Spray Pad/Wet Deck:

800-1,000 s.f. Spray Pad/Wet Deck with recirculation system, imbedded features and surrounding

concrete decking Probable cost estimate: $245,000 - $270,000

Above ground play features Probable cost estimate: $125,000 - $150,000

New 4’ fencing around Spray Pad/Wet Deck Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000

Subtotal: $374,000 - $425,000

Soft Costs (20%) $ 74,800 - $ 85,000

Estimated Spray Pad/Wet Deck Cost Range: $448,800 - $510,000

Option – 4 Total Estimated Cost Range: $491,400 - $558,600

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 16

SECTION THREE: EXISTING FACILITY

Facility Layout

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 17

2014 Admission Rates

Daily Pass $4.25 (includes tax)

Punch Card (10 sessions) $35 + tax

Punch Card (over age 65) $20 + tax

Season Pass

o 1 adult $90 + tax

o 1 couple or 1 child & parents $115 + tax

o 2 children & parents $140 + tax

o 3 children & parents $190 + tax

o 4 or more children & parents $240 + tax

2013 School Expenditures

Category Budget

Salaries $56,173

Professional Services $2,320

Communications/Phone $182

Postage/Printing $740

Utilities $8,181

Liability Insurance $2,649

Travel/Mileage $400

General Supplies $9,377

Concessions Purchase $4,403

Credit Card $1,173

Red Cross fee $1,027

Total $86,625

2013 City Expenditures

Category Budget

Repairs & Maintenance Supplies $3,777

Professional Services $10

Insurances $4,016

Repairs/Maintenance $170

Training/Seminars -

License, Fees & Registration $650

Donation Civic Org. $6,500

*Capital Outlay $53,749

Pool Fill (water costs) $972

Salaries (staff time) $31,295

-

Total $101,139

2013 Expense total (School & City): $187,764

*Capital Outlay costs covered the added chemical room and pool heater

Revenue vs. Expense (2013-2007)

2013

Category Budget

Revenue $85,247

Expense $187,764

Profit (Subsidy) ($102,517)

2012

Category Budget

Revenue $86,681

Expense $144,847


2011

Category Budget

Revenue $78,649

Expense $123,703


2010*

Category Budget

Revenue $76,495

Expense $120,768


USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 18

2009*

Category Budget

Revenue $71,833

Expense $117,437


2008*

Category Budget

Revenue $69,667

Expense $121,488


2007*

Category Budget

Revenue $63,908

Expense $115,576


*Indicates year(s) with estimated City operational expenses.

Revenue vs. Expenses

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 19

Census Information

Total Population: 7,378 (2012 estimate)

Households: 2,727

Families residing within the city: 1,910

Families with children under 18 = 42.5%

Population distribution by age:

o 17 & under 31.5%

o 18-24 6.6%

o 25-44 29.1%

o 45-64 20.4%

o 65+ 12.4%

When analyzing the estimated 2010 New Prague Census information the following information was

determined:

o The highest percentage of the population is those 17 and under at 31.5%. The second highest

age range is 25-44 at 29.1%, followed by the age range of 45-64 that accounted for 20.4% of

the population.

o This suggests an aquatic facility and added amenities that focuses on young families.

o The aquatic need is for a facility that offers a wider range of aquatic activities

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 20

2010 Attendance Information

Total afternoon and evening swim users 7,837

Average afternoon open swim users 101

Average evening swim session 29

Pool passes sold 120

10-session punch-cards 102

Swim lesson totals 693

o Afternoon admissions were split as 46% daily fee, 44% daily pass, 10% punch-card

o Evening admissions were split as 60% season pass, 32% daily fee, 8% punch-card

o Open swim was daily from 1-5pm and between 6pm – 8:30 pm on various evenings and

weekends

o Average attendance for afternoon open swim was 100.66 patrons

o Average attendance for evening open swim was 28.68 patrons

*Note: attendance data was only collected during the 2010 swim season

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 21

Existing Facility Photographs

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 22

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 23

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 24

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 25

SECTION FOUR: PRELIMINARY DESIGN

Option – 3 Renovate & Expand Existing Facility

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 26 of 30

Option – 4 Spray Pad/Wet Deck

(Sample shown on Existing Site)

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 27 of 30

Option – 5 New Family Aquatic Center

(Sample shown on Armory Site)

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 28 of 30

SECTION FIVE: NEW AQUATIC FACILITY ANALYSIS

The following are approximate construction costs for similar facilities. These numbers should be used for

planning purposes only as a guide in determining the relative cost of a new facility versus renovation of an

existing facility.

City: Population: Approx. Budget: Year Built:

Glencoe 5,628 $2,500,000 2000

Stewartville 5,926 $2,800,000 2006

Waseca 9,410 $3,600,000 2006

Redwood falls 5,253 $3,600,000 2008

Sleepy eye 3,598 $3,000,000 2009

Gaylord 2,307 $3,400,000 2009

La Crescent 4,860 $3,200,000 2010

Kasson 5,978 $3,200,000 2012

Cannon Falls 4,083 $3,990,000 -

Byron 4,965 $5,100,000 -

Pine Island 3,272 $2,600,000 -

Hutchinson 14,178 $5,500,000 -

Farmington 21,086 $7,077,000 -

New Prague 7,378 TBD -

*Primary Service area of 15 miles

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 29 of 30

APPENDIX A: EXISTING POOL DATA

SWIMMING WADING

POOL POOL

SIZE: 44 ft. x 75 ft. – 1 in. 20 ft. x 20 ft.

42 ft. x 38 ft. – 4 in.

15 ft. x 24 ft.

SURFACE AREA: SHALLOW WATER (< 5 FT) 3,469 sq. ft. 400 sq.ft.

DEEP WATER (> 5 FT) 1,609 sq. ft. ---

TOTAL: 5,078 sq. ft. 400 sq.ft.

SURGE CAPACITY:

REQUIRED (in gal.) 5,078 gallons 400 sq.ft.

SUPPLIED (in gal.) 5,078 gallons (in pool) 400 sq. ft. (in pool)

POOL CAPACITY: 210,000 gallons ~2,500 gallons

RATE OF FLOW:

FLOW RATE REQUIRED 548 gpm (6 hr turnover) 37.5 gpm (30gpm skimmer + 20% m.d.)

ACTUAL RATE OF FLOW ~ 450 gpm ~70 gpm

TURNOVER: ~7.8 hours ~36 min.

(6 hour max requ.) (2 hours max. requ.)

FILTER SIZE: 300 sq. ft. 25 sq. ft.

FILTER FLOW RATE: 7.33 gpm / s.f. 14.4 gpm / s.f.

BATHER LOAD: SHALLOW WATER 231 26

DEEP WATER 60 ---

TOTAL 291 persons 26 persons

USAQUATICS INC.



June 10, 2014

Page 30 of 30

APPENDIX B: 2010 COMMUNITY EDUCATION PLANNING SURVEY RESULTS

APPENDIX C: 2014 COMMUNITY SURVEY

Documents

New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool New Prague, MN