New Report Card Presentation

7/29/2019 New Report Card Presentation

1/52

AccountabilitySystem

March 20, 2013


2/52

No Child LeftBehind Waiver


3/52

HB 555Passed in December 2012


4/52

Accountability Committee

Members Michael Collins Stephanie Dodd Tom Gunlock,

Chair

C. Todd Jones Mark Smith Debe Terhar Bryan Williams


5/52

Report CardMeasures Grouped

into 6 Components

Component grades

and overall gradebegin in August 2015

New Report Card

Based on Letter Grades


6/52

Measures Phased In


7/52

Prepared for Success

K-3 Literacy

Graduation Rate

Gap Closing

Progress

Achievement

OverallGrade

Overall Grade & Components


8/52

Report Card Components


9/52



10/52



11/52



12/52

Achievement

Component

Performance IndicatorsPerformance Index


13/52

State Indicators 75% Proficient

State IndicatorsLetter Grade

State IndicatorsPercentage

A 90% - 100% **

B 80% - 89.9%

C 70% - 79.9% **

D 50% - 69.9%

F < 50% **

** Specified in legislation


14/52


School Districts

Community SchoolsTraditional Buildings


15/52


Urban 8 Districts

Community SchoolsUrban 8 Buildings


16/52


State IndicatorsLetter Grade

State IndicatorsPercentage

A 90% - 100% **

B 80% - 89.9%

C 70% - 79.9% **

D 50% - 69.9%

F < 50% **



17/52


School Districts



18/52


Urban 8 Districts



19/52

Performance Index

Performance IndexLetter Grade

Performance IndexPercentage

A 90% - 100% **

B 80% - 89.9%

C 70% - 79.9%

D 50% - 69.9%

F < 50% **



20/52

Performance Index

School Districts



21/52

Performance Index

Urban 8 Districts



22/52

Weighted Acceleration

3302.01(A) the department shall assign additional weights tostudents who have been permitted to pass over a subject inaccordance with a student acceleration policy If such a studentattains the advanced score the department shall assign to thestudent an additional proportional weight, as approved by the state

board.

1.3 Selected for Consistency


23/52

Graduation Rate

4 Year Rate

5 Year Rate


24/52

4 Year Graduation Rate

Grad Rate FourYear Letter Grade

Grad Rate FourYear Percentage

A 93% - 100% **

B 89% - 92.9%

C 84% - 88.9%

D 79% - 83.9%

F < 79%



25/52


School Districts



26/52


Urban 8 Districts



27/52


Grad Rate FiveYear Letter Grade

Grad Rate FiveYear Percentage

A 95% - 100% **

B 90% - 94.9%

C 85% - 89.9%

D 80% - 84.9%

F < 80%

New Measure** Specified in legislation


28/52


School Districts



29/52


Urban 8 Districts



30/52

Gap Closing

Annual Measurable Objectives(AMOs)


31/52

Ohios ESEAFlexibility Waiver


32/52

Annual Measurable Objectives(AMOs)

AMOLetter Grade

AMOPercentage

A 90% - 100%

B 80% - 89.9%

C 70% - 79.9%

D 60% - 69.9%

F < 60%


33/52

AMOs

School Districts



34/52

AMOs

Urban 8 Districts



35/52

Progress

Value Added:Overall

Gifted StudentsLowest 20%

Students with Disabilities


36/52

Value-Added

Value-AddedLetter Grade

Value-AddedGain Index

A > = 2.0

B >= 1 and < 2

C >= -1 and < 1

D >= -2 and < -1

F < -2


37/52

Value-Added: Overall

School Districts



38/52

Value-Added: Overall


Urban 8 Districts


39/52

Value-Added: Gifted

School Districts



40/52

Value-Added: Gifted

Urban 8 Districts



41/52

Value-Added: Lowest 20%

School Districts



42/52

Value-Added: Lowest 20%

Urban 8 Districts


Value Added:


43/52

Value-Added:Students with Disabilities

School Districts


Value Added:


44/52

Value-Added:Students with Disabilities

Urban 8 Districts



45/52

K- 3 Literacy

2013-2014 Measure Graded

2014-2015 Component Graded


46/52

2013-2014 Measures Reported

2014-2015 Component Graded


LRC R ll t Ti li


47/52

LRC Rollout TimelineAugust 2013

New Graded Measures

Performance Indicators

Performance Index



Annual Measureable Objectives(AMOs)

Value-Added: All Students

Value-Added: Gifted StudentsValue-Added: Lowest 20% inAchievement

Value-Added: Students with Disabilities

New GradedComponent

None

NoComponent orOverall Grade

Calculated

LRC R ll t Ti li


48/52


New GradedComponent

None

New Graded Measure

K-3 Literacy Improvement

New ReportedMeasures

College Admission Test

Dual Enrollment

Industry Credentials

Honors Diploma

Advanced Placement

International Baccalaureate

NoComponent orOverall Grade

Calculated

LRC R ll t Ti li


49/52


Component and Overall GradeCalculated

New GradedComponents

Achievement

Progress

Gap Closing

Graduation Rate

K-3 Literacy


New Graded Measure

None

New Reported Measure

College & Career Ready Assessment

LRC Rollo t Timeline


50/52


New Graded Measure

Value-Added: High School

New Reported Measure

None

New GradedComponent

None

Component and Overall GradeCalculated


51/52

Safe Harbor

The recommendation shall include amethod to exempt [schools and

districts] from sanctions and penaltiesprescribed by law based on report card

ratings.

House Bill 555


52/52

Questions

Documents

New Report Card Presentation