Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
New targets for plant breeding and the challenge of sustainable intensificationsustainable intensification
Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Stockholm, 29-30/01/13
J A Pickett Rothamsted ResearchJ.A. Pickett, Rothamsted Research
New directions for agriculture in the 21st Century
There is a pressing need for the ‘sustainable intensification’ of global agriculture in which yields are increased without adverse environmental impact and without the cultivation of more land
A second green revolution which is knowledge intensive rather than input intensive?rather than input intensive?
Royal Society (2009) Policy Document 11/9
SustainabilitySustainability
Now Future
No loss to pests, diseases and weeds because carbon footprint from land
Delivery, via the seed/planting material, of yield traits nutrition and cropfootprint from land
preparation, fertilizers, seed and pesticides, and their delivery is already committed
traits, nutrition and crop protection, plus move from annual to perennial crops (new issues of pest control indelivery, is already committed (new issues of pest control in rhizosphere)
Influence of different crop plant species on organic : conventional yield ratios
Seufert et al. (2012), Nature, 485: 229
Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing d L d S i C dand Land Sparing Compared
Abstract
The question of how to meet rising food demand at the least cost to biodiversityrequires the evaluation of two contrasting alternatives: land sharing, whichintegrates both objectives on the same land; and land sparing in which high yieldintegrates both objectives on the same land; and land sparing, in which high-yieldfarming is combined with protecting natural habitats from conversion toagriculture. To test these alternatives, we compared crop yields and densities ofbird and tree species across gradients of agricultural intensity in southwest Ghanabird and tree species across gradients of agricultural intensity in southwest Ghanaand northern India. More species were negatively affected by agriculture thanbenefited from it, particularly among species with small global ranges. For bothtaxa in both countries land sparing is a more promising strategy for minimizingtaxa in both countries, land sparing is a more promising strategy for minimizingnegative impacts of food production, at both current and anticipated future levelsof production.
Phalan et al. (2011), Science 333: 1289
Production of Behaviour-Controlling Chemicals by Crop Plants
Abstract
The possibilities of breeding crop plants that produce insect pheromonesThe possibilities of breeding crop plants that produce insect pheromonesand other behaviour-controlling chemicals and of obtaining antifeedantsfrom natural sources for protection against invertebrate pests arediscussed The possible role of genetic manipulation in these approaches todiscussed. The possible role of genetic manipulation in these approaches tocrop protection is also considered.
Pickett (1985), Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. B 310: 235
Zeyaur Khan Charles yMidega
Push-Pull or Stimulo-Deterrent Diversionary Strategy (Vuta Sukuma)
Main CropMain Crop
Trap Crop
Attract moths
Attract naturalenemies
Moths are pushed away
Intercrops – Melinis, Desmodiump ,Cook et al. (2007), Ann. Rev. Ent. 52: 375;
Hassanali et al. (2008), Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B, 363: 611; Tamiru et al. (2011), Ecol. Lett. 14: 1083
Commercial decision support
Hooper et al. (2007), Tet. Lett. 48: 5991
Current highly effective pesticides are small lipophilic molecules (SLMs) derived from natural product leads and, for some, are natural products
Insecticide Target Natural product lead
pyrethroid sodium channel/activators pyrethrin Ipyrethroid sodium channel/activators pyrethrin I
indoxacarb/ sodium channel/blockers xmetaflumizone
organophosphate/ acetylcholinesterase/inhibitors xcarbamate physostigmine
neonicotinoid nAChR nicotine/epibatidine
spinosad nAChR spinosyns
cyclodiene/ chloride channel/gaba xfiproles
abamectin chloride channel/glutamate avermectins
diamide calcium release channel (muscle) (ryanodine)
tetronic acid acetyl CoA carboxylase/inhibitor x
Tanacetum cinariifolium
pyrethrin I
HYDROXAMIC ACIDS IN WHEAT (benzoxazinones)
Insects (chewing and sucking) and
MeO O OH
DIMBOA
and sucking) and airborne pathogens
N O
OH
DIMBOA
APHIDS, artificial diets
Fungi, bacteria and nematodes
Moraes et al. (2008), Phytochem. 69: 9
Allelopathy, weeds
Intrinsic rate of population increase of the cereal aphid Rhopalosiphum padi on diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid wheat (hydroxamic acids, active against aphids and other pests and diseases, are present but only effective in ancestral species)
diploid tetraploid hexaploid
0,45
0,35
0,4
0,25
0,3
0,2
spe
ltoides
MDR 04
9
8116
longissima
MDR0
43
8404
MDR0
50 102
MDR0
44 Ae …
MDR2
98
8150
Napier
Tasm
an
920/2
W32
3
L58
L69
920/9
920/3
T. dicoccum
Istabraq
920/10
L112
Svilena
Welford
W32
0
920/1
Turtsikum
920/4
920/11
Robigus
Solstice
MV4
Alifen
Hum
ber
L124 L61 L3
Largo
L25
PI29
4994
L122
Ae
Ae T
Intrinsic rate of population increase of the cereal aphid Rhopalosiphum padi on diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid wheat (hydroxamic acids, active against aphids and other pests and diseases, are present but only effective in ancestral species)
diploid tetraploid hexaploid
0,45
0,35
0,4
0,25
0,3
0,2
spe
ltoides
MDR 04
9
8116
longissima
MDR0
43
8404
MDR0
50 102
MDR0
44 Ae …
MDR2
98
8150
Napier
Tasm
an
920/2
W32
3
L58
L69
920/9
920/3
T. dicoccum
Istabraq
920/10
L112
Svilena
Welford
W32
0
920/1
Turtsikum
920/4
920/11
Robigus
Solstice
MV4
Alifen
Hum
ber
L124 L61 L3
Largo
L25
PI29
4994
L122
Ae
Ae T
F1 hybrids between the aliens and normal wheat are treated with colchicine to double the chromosome number and produce fertile amphidiploids
F1 hybrid shedding pollen:Ae speltoides 2140008 XAe. speltoides 2140008 X Chinese Spring Euploid 94
C l hi i t t d F1 h b id l t
F1 hybrid setting seed:Ae. mutica 2130004 X Chi S i E l id 94Colchicine treated F1 hybrid plants Chinese Spring Euploid 94
Ian & Julie King, University of Nottingham (unpublished)
BX1
rye, diploid wheat
maize, hexaploid wheat
Frey et al (1997) Nomura et al (2003) Sue et al (2006)
Activation by glucosidases
Frey et al. (1997), Nomura et al. (2003), Sue et al. (2006)
Moraes et al. (2008), Phytochem. 69: 9
Ahmad et al. (2011), Plant Physiol. 157: 317
It is time now, in planning the new generation ofGMOs for delivery of pest control, to target the
l d h i b i d fnatural products that, acting by non-toxic modes ofaction, affect, in more sophisticatedways behavioural and developmental processes inways, behavioural and developmental processes inthe pest organisms. Such natural products areexemplified as insect pheromones and otherp psemiochemicals, i.e. those chemicals that affectdevelopment or behaviour of organisms generally( d ill i l d “ it hi ” f th(and will include “switching on” genes for thebiosynthesis of semiochemicals by means ofanother set of natural products that act as plantanother set of natural products that act as plantactivators).
Coupled gas chromatography-electrophysiology
EAG/SCRsample
FIDFIDsplitter
GC
air N2
a. Two hypotheses for host location:-
Plant Volatile1. Ratio-specific odour recognition:
ORN
Plant VolatilePlant Volatile
Plant VolatileORN
ORNORN
plant odour specificity is achieved by a particular ratio between constituent volatiles, distributed generally among
CNS
Plant VolatileORN
, g y gplant species
2. Species-specific odour recognition: host plant odour recognition relies upon
Plant Volatile
host plant odour recognition relies upon taxonomically characteristic volatiles not found in unrelated plant species
ORN
CNSCNS
Bruce et al. (2005), Trends in Plant Sci. 10: 269Bruce & Pickett (2011) Phytochem 72: 1605Bruce & Pickett (2011), Phytochem. 72: 1605Pickett et al. (2012), Physiol. Ent. 37: 2
Female Sitodiplosis mosellana responses to semiochemicals identified from wheat, cv. “ECO22”, in the olfactometer, ,
7
*5
6
n) *
*
2
3
4
pent
(min
0
1
2
Tim
e sp
-2
-1
0
4-comp 5-comp (natural ratio) 5-comp (unnatural ratio)-2
7ng a-pinene5ng 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one10ng 3-carene
7ng a-pinene15ng 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one10ng 3-careneBruce et al (2005) Trends in 10ng 3-carene
4ng acetophenone4ng 2-dodecanone
10ng 3-carene 4ng acetophenone4ng 2-dodecanone
Bruce et al. (2005), Trends in Plant Sci. 10: 269
a. Two hypotheses for host location:-
Plant Volatile1. Ratio-specific odour recognition:
ORN
Plant VolatilePlant Volatile
Plant VolatileORN
ORNORN
plant odour specificity is achieved by a particular ratio between constituent volatiles, distributed generally among
CNS
Plant VolatileORN
, g y gplant species
2. Species-specific odour recognition: host plant odour recognition relies upon
Plant Volatile
host plant odour recognition relies upon taxonomically characteristic volatiles not found in unrelated plant species
ORN
CNSCNS
Bruce et al. (2005), Trends in Plant Sci. 10: 269Bruce & Pickett (2011) Phytochem 72: 1605Bruce & Pickett (2011), Phytochem. 72: 1605Pickett et al. (2012), Physiol. Ent. 37: 2
Pests of oilseed rape
Meligethes aeneus
Psylliodes chrysocephala
Ceutorhynchus assimilis
GC-EAG of cabbage stem flea beetle, Psylliodes chrysocephala, with volatiles from oilseed rape
Biosynthesis of methionene-derived glucosinolates in Arabidopsisthaliana: methylthioalkylmalate (MAM) synthase, the condensingy y ( ) y genzyme of the chain elongation cycle
Etc
Textor et al. (2004), Planta 218: 1026
H
OPP
Pickett (1985), Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B 310: 235
Biosynthesis of (E)-β-farnesene and (1R,4E,9S)- caryophyllene
H
b
OPP
aa
b
H
HH
H
The Eβf (alarm pheromone) synthase gene for aphid control
Mentha piperita chemotype no longer synthesising Eβf; two genes having high overall amino acid sequence identity with known Eβf synthase.
H
MpSS1, when cis-muurola-3,5-dienep ,expressed in E. coli plus FPP, gave:
,[and cis-muurola-4(14),5-diene]
MpSS2 (with 2 aas different from Eβf synthase), when expressed in E. coli plus FPP, gave nothing.
BUT with L531S (site-directed mutagenesis product restoring one of the Eβf synthase aas) it gives highly selective production of Eβfsynthase aas), it gives highly selective production of Eβf.
Prosser et al. (2006), Phytochem. 67: 1564
GC of volatiles from flowering Arabidopsis thaliana (A) wild-type and (B) transformed line: (1R,4E,9S)-caryophyllene (1), (E)-β-farnesene (2)
pA
(B) transformed line: (1R,4E,9S) caryophyllene (1), (E) β farnesene (2)
p
2000
2500
3000
A
500
1000
1500
1
min0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350
pA
3000
2
1000
1500
2000
2500
B2
min0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350
5001
Beale et al. (2006), PNAS 103: 10509
Wheat transformation
• Transformation of a plant to emit an insect pheromone was shown for the first time in Arabidopsis
• Now achieved in wheat cv ‘Cadenza’ but with a different• Now achieved in wheat, cv. Cadenza , but with a different transformation process
• Alarm pheromone-emitting GM wheat– repels aphids
tt t th i t l i– attracts their natural enemies
• The next step is to test GM wheat under field conditionsThe next step is to test GM wheat under field conditions
Analysis of GM wheat pollen in honey
Background:
• ECJ ruling 6/9/11 - honey containing pollen from unauthorised GM events could not be soldECJ ruling 6/9/11 honey containing pollen from unauthorised GM events could not be sold.• Local Hertfordshire bee-keepers concerned about GM wheat pollen.• Honey bees known to forage over several Km, but do not normally collect wheat pollen.• May occasionally collect ‘honeydew’ from aphids feeding on wheat.
We set out to answer two questions:
Does honey from local hives usually contain wheat pollen?Does honey from local hives usually contain wheat pollen?Did honey from sentinel hives intentionally placed close to GM trial contain GM wheat pollen?
We used a PCR-based TaqMan method to detect specific DNA sequences in honey d i d t th t land carried out three separate analyses:
1. We determined the limit of detection for the method using honey spiked with GM pollen.2. In 2011 (before the trial was planted but after local wheat had flowered), we tested2. In 2011 (before the trial was planted but after local wheat had flowered), we tested
honey from hives on the Rothamsted farm and surrounding areas for wheat pollen.3. In 2012 (after the trial and local wheat had flowered), we tested honey from sentinel
hives placed close to the GM trial for the presence of GM and non-GM wheat pollen.
Analysis of GM wheat pollen in honey
Establishing a limit of detection:Honey (collected in 2011 when no wheat was flowering) was spiked with 0 1 10 100 1000 and 10 000 GM wheat pollenspiked with 0, 1, 10, 100, 1000 and 10,000 GM wheat pollen grains (all in triplicate).
TaqMan assay applied to all samples Designed to detect 3 genes:TaqMan assay applied to all samples. Designed to detect 3 genes:1. COX (cytochrome oxidase) internal general plant control gene.2. WPAL (wheat phenylalanine ammonia-lyase), wheat-specific.3. EBF transgene.
Results:
COX gene was abundant in all samples g p(indicated by lower CT value) due to OSR and other pollen species.
Wh t PAL d t d t t dC
Tva
lue
Wheat PAL and transgene were detected in honey containing 100 pollen grains or more.
LOD lies between 10 and 100 grains.No. of pollen grains
A l i f h l d b f d d i GM t i lAnalysis of honey sampled before and during GM trial
Was GM pollen found in honey?
In summer 2012, after GM trial wheat had flowered, we collected and tested honey from six sentinel hives placed close to the trial sitesentinel hives placed close to the trial site.
No GM pollen was detected.
Does honey ever contain wheat pollen?
Honey collected from hives on the Rothamsted Farm in 2011 and from sentinel hives inHoney collected from hives on the Rothamsted Farm in 2011, and from sentinel hives in 2012, was tested for wheat pollen. None was detected in 2011 and a trace level was found in some samples from the sentinel hives in 2012.
Pollen analysis done by Fera
SLM
Pickett & Poppy (2001), Trends in Plant Sci. 6: 137 Bruce & Pickett (2007), Curr. Op. Plant Biol. 10: 387
SLM
Pickett & Poppy (2001), Trends in Plant Sci. 6: 137 Bruce & Pickett (2007), Curr. Op. Plant Biol. 10: 387
O
Bi k tt t l (2000) PNAS 97 9329Birkett et al. (2000), PNAS 97: 9329Bruce et al. (2008), PNAS 105: 4553
Characterisation of a cis-jasmone responsive promoter: t ti f t / t f i f CYP81D11construction of a promoter/reporter fusion for CYP81D11
stop
At3g28750
Start P450
At3g28750
luciferaseorGUSAt3g28750 At3g28750 GUS
= exon
Promoter
= exon
= intron Ca. 1 kb
- cis-jasmone + cis-jasmone - cis-jasmone + cis-jasmone
Matthes et al.
Matthes et al. (2010), Planta 232: 1163
(2011), Plant Sig. & Behav. 6: 1
H
Signal SLMOPP
O
g
Field trial with wheat
1.2 *1
control
cis-jasmone
P = 0.036
0.8
ds /
Tille
r
cis jasmone
0.6
n N
o. A
phid
*
0 2
0.4
Mea
n
0
0.2
28-May 8-Jun 16-Jun 24-Jun 6-Jul
Bruce et al. (2003), Pest Man. Sci. 59: 1031
Aphidius ervi foraging on cis-jasmone treated wheatp g g j
25
15
20
10
min
0
5
Significantly longer time spent on i d d l t
Treated Control
induced plants
Potential for enhancement of useful traits in crop plants by cis-jasmoneby cis jasmone
Putative biosynthesis of (E,E)- 4,8,12-trimethyl-1,3,7,11-tridecatetraene in Arabidopsis thalianatridecatetraene in Arabidopsis thaliana
CYP82G1 (Insect-induced)
CYP81D11 / CYP72A13?
(CJ-induced)
Bruce et al. (2008), PNAS 105: 4553
Lee et al. (2010), PNAS 107: 21025
Matthes et al. (2010), Planta 232: 1163
Dewhirst et al. (2012), Pest Man. Sci. 68: 1419
O
Blassioli-Moraes et al. (2009), Ent. Exp. App. 131: 178
“Smart maize”: indirect defence elicited by herbivore eggs
Smart plants detect egg-laying by pests and call in natural enemies (parasitic wasps) to attack eggs and larvae before plant damage occurs
Bruce et al. (2010), Biol. Lett. 6: 314; Tamiru et al. (2011), Ecol. Lett. 14: 1083
GC profiles of systemically released headspace volatiles from a representativeheadspace volatiles from a representative maize landrace line C-2101 (Cuba), with or without Chilo partellus eggs
EAG active compounds:
(a) (E)-ocimene(a) (E) ocimene(b) (R)-linalool(c) (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene (DMNT)(d) methyl salicylate ( ) y y(e) decanal (f) methyleugenol(g) (E)-(1R,9S)-caryophyllene(g) ( ) ( ) y y(h) (E)-β-farnesene (i) (E,E)-4,8,12-trimethyl-1,3,7,11-tridecatetraene (TMTT)
Tamiru et al. (2011), Ecol. Lett. 14: 1083
Smart sensing to optimise farm inputs:sensitive sentinel plants detect problem, not just pests, diseases andweed competition but also depleted or excess nutrients and water, andsignal to main crop of smart plants, with natural response to signal SLMslinked to gene expression (by GM) to deal with problem (or opportunity)
Sentinel plantSentinel plantMain crop
Smart sensing to optimise farm inputs:sensitive sentinel plants detect problem, not just pests, diseases andweed competition but also depleted or excess nutrients and water, andsignal to main crop of smart plants, with natural response to signal SLMslinked to gene expression (by GM) to deal with problem (or opportunity)
Sentinel plantSentinel plantMain crop
Problem detected
Response to problem
Destruction of global soybean crop?
Phakopsora pachyrhizi, soybean rust (with C B Hoffmann(with C.B. Hoffmann-Campo and S. Lima, EMBRAPA, Brazil)
OHHO
OHThe most Striga-inhibitory chemistry from Desmodiumspp, and biosynthesis by C-glycosylation
OH Onaringenin chalcone
HOOH
FLAVANONE
spp, and biosynthesis by C glycosylation
OHO
OH O
OH
XY
OHO
OHOHHO
OH
OOH
FLAVANONE
OH O
OHOH
naringeninX
OH OHO
OH D. uncinatum CGT
CYP450X-Y = CH2CH or CH2COH
OHO
OH O
OH
2-hydroxynaringeninOHO
HOOH
HHO
OH
OHFLAVONE
OHO
OH O
OOH
HOOH
OHO
OH O
OH
R = H; apigenin
R3'Hamilton et al. (2009), Tet. Lett. 50: 565
Hooper et al. (2010), Phytochem. 71: 904R3' = H; apigeninR3' = OH; luteolinKhan et al. (2010), J. Exp. Bot. 61: 4185
Hamilton et al. (2012), Phytochem. 84: 169
Broader opportunities: delivery by the seed
• Suppression of methane production by ruminants
• Interference with N20 release from fertilized soils
CH4
CH4
Perennial crops
Perennial rice (Oryza sativa/O. longistaminata)Perennial rice (Oryza sativa/O. longistaminata)
Food Crops Research Institute, Kunming
Beijing Genetics Institute, ShengzhenBeijing Genetics Institute, Shengzhen
Perennial wheat (Thinopyrum spp)Washington State University, Pullman
Chemistry
Mik Bi k ttVisiting Scientists/
RI F llMike BirkettStephen BarasaJohn Caulfield
Keith Biology
RI Fellows
Andrea BirkeH i G l tKeith
ChamberlainTony Hooper
Patrick Mayon
Biology
Gudbjorg Inga AradottirToby Bruce
Henrique GoulartMarilene Fancelli
Salvador LimaMarlene LimpalaerPatrick Mayon
John PickettToby Bruce
Jason ChapmanJames CookSam Cook
Marlene LimpalaerCarol Moraes
Paulina PowolowskaAlessandro RiffelPlant Mol Biol Sam Cook
Sarah DewhirstHenriette ElekJanet Martin
Alessandro RiffelBenisio Silva-Filho
Jozsef Vuts
Plant Mol. Biol.
Shakoor AhmadHuw Jones Janet Martin
Lesley SmartBen Webster
Christine Woodcock
Huw JonesMichaela MatthesJohnathan Napier Retired
Technical Development
Insect Mol. Biol.
Lin Field
Margaret BlightDavid Griffiths
Wilf Powell L W dh
p
Barry PyeXiaoli He
Jing-Jiang ZhouLester Wadhams