8/8/2019 New York Times Guest Column Submission
1/3
Office of Leon R. Koziol1518 Genesee Street
Utica, NY 13502Phone: (315) 796-4000
[email protected]
Andrew RosenthalOpinion Page Editor December 1, 2010New York
Times
Dear Mr. Rosenthal: Re: Guest Column
In April, 2008, the New York court system brought action against
the other branches ofgovernment demanding pay raises. Predictably,
the court system won because its lawsuit wasfiled in its own
courts. The losers then ignored the final judgment, maintaining
that the judiciaryhad exceeded its constitutional powers over the
other branches where the People had vested
budgetary authority.
A host of anomalies followed along with a dangerous precedent
for constituents. When two-thirds of an elected government declares
void the edicts of its courts, residents are invited to dothe same
under the human rights provisions of both the federal and state
constitutions. The Ninthand Tenth Amendments provide additional
legal authority for this.
Certain rights are deemed inalienable, and our supreme laws can
contemplate no greaterprotection than the liberty of parents to
raise their offspring. Unfortunately, like the pay raisefiasco, New
Yorks court system has been exceeding its powers by trampling all
over this rightin its own tribunals.
The transgression carries far greater implications than those
associated with annual judicialsalaries of $136,000. State
infringements upon parent-child relations produce violations of a
fullrange of other rights protected by our Constitution. These
include free speech, free association,free religion and privacy
interests, among others.
However, not unlike child control doctrines championed by Adolph
Hitler, the state simplydeclares that it is acting in our childrens
best interests, and these precious human rights incura disappearing
act. The magic show has been underway for decades all across
America, but wiservictims are recognizing their domestic courts for
what they have become.
Virtually every social ill of our day can be traced to divorce
and custody laws which coerceparents to fight over their own
children in public court contests. These needless and
barbaricprocesses exploit children for profit. Employers, forensic
witnesses and entire families are hauledinto them with a collective
impact that is harming the productivity of an entire nation.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
8/8/2019 New York Times Guest Column Submission
2/3
Andrew RosenthalPage two12/1/10
Family Court litigants do not grasp the enormity of rights they
surrender when setting out to
compensate strangers at their childrens expense. Like Pavlovs
dogs, they are conditioned topetition government for the answers to
all their parenting failures, only to find that the state
isoverburdened, underfinanced and wholly incompetent to raise those
same children.
This responsibility remains, as it always has, in the hands of
two very distinct persons: a fatherand a mother. While many
settings do not permit one or both figures, government is
renderingthem obsolete. Mainstream parents who simply choose to
live apart are lumped together withunfit characters and forced to
prove themselves in search of a gender merged award of
custodialparent.
So alien is this state creation that it is empowered to believe
that a child is better off with money
than the other parent. Custodial parents across the country are
demanding imprisonment of theirnatural counterparts simply because
an arbitrary federal formula requires greater cash transfers tothe
state (support collection unit). The formula has little regard for
parental agreement or themaintenance of a non-custodial family
unit.
Overriding constitutional reform, judges are finding no issue
with debtor prison practices, inmany cases jailing good parents
without counsel (the subject of an upcoming Supreme Courtcase).
Interest revenues are then collected off of mass produced support
orders to pay for raisesand additional intrusions. When coupled
with federal incentive grants, it is plain to see that
amulti-billion dollar child industry has moved our courts well
beyond their founding framework.
Transfer payments through power (custody) and money (support)
awards comprise the longantiquated vehicles for generating
controversy, fees, revenues and scrutiny of diverse familyunits.
Unless parents are found to be unfit or dependent on public
assistance, the state has nopower under an American form of
government to micromanage private affairs.
As a new leadership enters Congress, policymakers would do well
to overhaul the welfaresystem known as Title IV-D of the Social
Security Act. Designed to target absentee fathers, itwas expanded
over time to mainstream parents in order to fund the entire system.
This socialistexperiment has backfired to produce more costly
impacts upon crime, education, our economyand future generations of
Americans.
Very truly yours,
Leon R. Koziol, J.D.
Leon Koziol is a civil rights advocate who has practiced
constitutional law for more than 23years in New York State.
Recently, he established the Parenting Rights Institute with
anationwide support base. For more information, visit him
atwww.leonkoziol.com.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39262064/Parenting-Rights-Institute-Prospectus-Version-5http://opt/scribd/conversion/tmp/scratch6593/www.leonkoziol.comhttp://opt/scribd/conversion/tmp/scratch6593/www.leonkoziol.comhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/39262064/Parenting-Rights-Institute-Prospectus-Version-5http://opt/scribd/conversion/tmp/scratch6593/www.leonkoziol.com
