2:00 Welcome and Overview of Call Steve Klein

2:05 Open Space & Updates:

■ Office of Career, Technical, andAdult Education (OCTAE) - Division of Academic and TechnicalEducation (DATE) updates

OCTAE-DATE Staff

2:10 How Are We Doing?: State Assessment Sharon Miller, OCTAE, DATE

and ESSA Indicators 1S1 and 1S2 Cathie Raymond, Arizona Department of

EducationLuke Rhine and Melvin D’Souza, Delaware

Department of Education

2:35 You Want It When?: Preparing for andSurviving the CAR Submission Process

Steve Klein, RTI International

2:55 Closing OCTAE-DATE Staff

3:00 Adjourn

Next Steps Work Group

Agenda

July 12, 2018

Next Steps Work Group

• Your observations needed on the Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) submission process: – For veteran submitters: What are some tips you can share with the larger group? – For those newer to the process: What are some questions you have or challenges you

face in the CAR submission process?

We will discuss the question in the second portion of the call.

Next Steps Work Group

How Are We Doing?: State Assessment and ESSAIndicators

Presenters:

Sharon Miller, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education: U.S. Department of Education Cathie Raymond, Arizona Department of Education Luke Rhine and Melvin D’Souza, Delaware Department of Education

Percentage of CTE concentrators meeting State-established reading/language arts standards

Average Target Average Performance 3 Year Performance Average

100.00%

90.00%

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

62.84%

80.19%

66.38%

74.82%

67.44%

75.31%

69.74%

75.09%

70.70%

76.96%

70.51%

77.48%

66.90%

72.69%

63.67%

70.91% 70.91%

60.88%

68.16%

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Percentage of CTE concentrators meeting State-established mathematics standards

Average Target Average Performance 3 Year Performance Average

100.00%

90.00%

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

55.11% 54.05%

58.93% 59.56% 59.66% 63.20% 63.97% 62.97%

58.84%

77.32% 79.98%

69.92%71.29% 71.90%

69.85% 65.37% 64.82%

60.87% 63.69%

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

1S1 and 1S2 Indicator Performance - Arizona

Years Performance measure State adjusted level of performance (SALP)

90 percent Actual

Academic Year (AY) 2013-14

1S1 86.00 77.40 96.51

1S2 75.00 67.50 89.10

AY 2014-15

1S1 88.00 79.20 96.50

1S2 79.00 71.10 87.38

AY 2015-16

1S1 30.00 27.00 26.81

1S2 30.00 27.00 15.37

AY 2016-17

1S1 28.00 25.20 29.34

1S2 17.00 15.30 28.05

1S2 Indicator Performance - Delaware

# Proficient

# All Students

Percent Proficient

Percent Proficient Target

Notes

AY 2014-15

CTE 3,462 4,426 78.2 70.2 • 1S2 data reported for seniors taking assessment two years prior • Assessment = Delaware Comprehensive Assessment System (DCAS) • CTE = CTE concentrators in their primary CTE program. Number may

be less than all CTE concentrators who may have taken assessment All students

6,382 9,223 69.2 70.2

AY 2015-16

CTE 887 4,343 20.4 70.2 • 1S2 data reported for seniors taking assessment one year prior • Assessment = Smarter Balanced • Drop in proficiency expected as multi-state normed Smarter

Balanced test is more rigorous than DCAS All students

1,752 7,520 23.3 70.2

AY 2016-17

CTE 1,626 5,984 27.2 20.5 • Starting 2016-17, denominators of 1S1 and 1S2 changed to reflect all CTE concentrator seniors exiting in reporting year (before, denominator was CTE seniors taking assessment two years prior).

• Assessment = SAT taken in prior year (paid for by Delaware schools and taken by nearly all students)

• 2016-17 is a new base year for sub-group comparisons

All students

2,619 8,793 29.8 20.5

1S2 Indicator Performance - Delaware

Next Steps Work Group

You Want it When?: Preparing for and Survivingthe CAR Submission Process

Presenter:

Steve Klein, RTI International

CAR Submission Resources

CAR Submission Resources

CAR Submission Resources

User guide can be found here: https://s3.amazonaws.com/PCRN/docs/CAR_User_Guide_2017.pdf

Your CAR Observations

– For veteran submitters: What are some tips you can share with the larger group? – For those newer to the process: What are some questions you have or challenges you

face in the CAR submission process?

Please indicate that you would like to share using the “Raise Hand” function and wait for the moderator to call on you.

Next Steps Work Group

• Thank you to the 2017-18 NSWG Planning Team and members! • Evaluation and next year’s topics:

https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/4416803/2017-18-NSWG-Evaluation

• Interested in becoming a 2018-19 NSWG Planning Team member?Contact Rebecca Moyer: rmoyer@rti.org