19
NEXT GENERATION ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM DESIGN PHDSTUDENT:GUSTAVO SOUZA ADVISOR:VÍTOR LEAL 7 June 2011

NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

NEXT  GENERATION  ENERGY  EFFICIENCY  PROGRAM  DESIGN  

PHD  STUDENT:  GUSTAVO  SOUZA  ADVISOR:  VÍTOR  LEAL  

7 June 2011

Page 2: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Motivation  

Next  genera*on  energy  efficiency  program  design   2  

Several  countries  and  regions  are  building  energy  efficiency  (EE)  plans  in  order  to   follow   agreements   to   reach   sustainability   targets,   decrease   energy  dependence  and  improve  efficiency  of  the  economy.    

Evalua*ng  several  plans,   it  becomes  clear   that  current  planning  prac*ce  is  s*ll  missing  :    • A  transparent  simula*on  method  to  es9mate  the   impacts   from   technology-­‐oriented   EE  measures;  

•   A  methodology  to  select  the  most  fiBed  sets  of  measures.  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

Page 3: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%
Page 4: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%
Page 5: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%
Page 6: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Efficiency  planning  as  a  choice  problem  

Cogeneration

LED Street lighting LED semaphores Pathways for bycicles

Parking taxes

Bus pricing

Photovoltaic Solar thermal

Thermal insulation of roofs ??

Page 7: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

•  Measure  the  effect  of  a  plan  by  comparing  with  “the  future  without  a  plan”,  not  with  the  present;  

•  It  is  not  enough  to  develop  A  plan  that  achieves  the  targets:  It  is  important  to  develop  Many  alterna*ves  and  to  choose  the  “best”  one;  

•  The  targets  themselves  can  be  subjected  to  cost-­‐benefit  analysis  instead  of  being  chosen  s*ll  before  knowing  what  they  require;  

Without plan

With plan

Plan

eff

ect

X

time

Page 8: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

The  original  PhD  thesis  contributions    

8  

•   Development  of  Method  &    Tool  where  decision  makers  can   find   the  most   fiGed   sets   of  measures   in   rela9on   to  their  specified  chosen  criteria.    

•   A  method  to  structure  and  quan*fy  the  breakdown  per  energy  end-­‐use  in  the  sectors  of  the  economy,  considering  the  different  end-­‐uses  and  energy  carriers.    •    A  method   to   project   a   base-­‐line   scenario   and   compare  results  (EE  scenarios  and  base-­‐line)  in  the  future.    •    A  methodology   to   compare   and   evaluate   EE  measures  using  a  Mul*-­‐criteria  approach.    

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

Page 9: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

The  approach  to  the  problem  

9  

1.  Characterize  the  end-­‐uses,  their  technologies  and  the  respec*ve  energy  carriers,  from  the  main  sectors  in  order  to  model  an  energy  system  (regional  or  na*onal  level).  

2.  Develop  physically-­‐based  method  to  project  future  demand.  

3.  Systema*c  iden9fica9on  and  quan9fica9on  of  technology-­‐oriented  EE  measures  inside  each  sector.  

4.  Iden*fy  criteria  to  evaluate  EE  measures.  5.  Develop  Method  to  compute  impacts  of  

sets  of  measures  on  future  demand;  6.  Develop  MCDM  evalua*on  plaZorm;  

7.  Test  in  a  case  using  Portugal  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

Page 10: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

End-­‐use  breakdown    model  

10  

12  End-­‐uses  47  Technologies  

10  End-­‐uses  55  Technologies  

10  End-­‐uses  28  Technologies  

10  End-­‐uses  37  Technologies  

42  End-­‐uses  177  Technologies  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

Page 11: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

From  end-­‐use  model  to    energy  efPiciency  measures  

11  

End-­‐use   Measures  Domes*c  Hot  

Water  

Subs*tu*on  of  domes*c  hot  water  systems  for  most  efficient  natural  gas  storage  water  heaters  Subs*tu*on  of  domes*c  hot  water  systems  for  most  efficient  electric  heat  pump  water  heaters  Subs*tu*on  of  domes*c  hot  water  systems  for  most  efficient  solar  water  heaters  +  electric  storage  water  heater  

Ambient  Hea*ng  Replacement  of  ambient  hea*ng  systems  for  most  efficient  centralized  natural  gas  hea*ng  Replacement  of  ambient  hea*ng  systems  for  most  efficient  centralized  electric  heat  pump  systems  Replacement  of  ambient  hea*ng  systems  for  heat  distribu*on  systems  

Motors  Replacement  of  motor  with  output  range  between  0  and  0.75  kW  for  most  efficient  ones  (EFF3)  Replacement  of  motor  with  output  range  between  10  and  30  kW  for  most  efficient  ones  (EFF3)  Replacement  of  motor  with  output  range  between  130  and  500  kW  for  most  efficient  ones  (EFF3)  

Ligh*ng  Subs*tu*on  of  lamps  for  most  efficient  compact  fluorescent  lamps  Subs*tu*on  of  lamps  for  most  efficient  high  intensity  discharge  lamps  Introducing  sensors  and  control  systems  

Process  Hea*ng   Increase  the  use  of  waste  hea*ng  Individual  

Transport  by  Road  

Subs*tu*on  of  individual  transports  for  most  efficient  hybrid  gasoline  cars  Subs*tu*on  of  individual  transports  for  most  efficient  CNG  cars  Subs*tu*on  of  individual  transports  for  most  efficient  PHEV  

Mass  Transport  by  Rail  

Subs*tu*on  of  trains  for  most  efficient  diesel  trains  Subs*tu*on  of  trains  for  most  efficient  electric  trains  Modal  shig  from  bus  to  trains  

Freight  Transport  by  Road  

Subs*tu*on  of  trucks  for  most  efficient  diesel  trucks  Subs*tu*on  of  trucks  for  most  efficient  CNG  trucks  

Around  200*  quan*fiable  technology-­‐oriented  energy  efficiency  measures  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

*1600  when  considering  specific  technology  and  energy  carrier  subs*tu*on  

Page 12: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Scenario  assessment  –  test  case  0  

12  

Energy  use  in  Portugal  in  2020  by  sector  with  and  without  EE  measures  

Energy  use  in  Portugal  in  2020  by  carrier  with  and  without  EE  measures  

EE  Scenario:  Change  of  10%  of  the  stock  relevant  to  each  measure  Measures:  Insula*on  of  houses,  changing  windows,  subs*tu*on  of  cold  appliances,  replacing  electric  motors,  introducing  electric  and  ethanol  cars,  solar  hot  water.    

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

Domestic Industry Services Transports0

2

4

6

8

10

12x 107

Sectors

Ener

gy u

se in

MW

h

BeforeAfter

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9x 107

Ener

gy u

se in

MW

h

Energy Carriers

Bio Gas

Biodies

el

BiomassCoal

Cold Wate

rDiesel

Diesel fo

r Hea

ting

Electric

ity

Ethanol

Fuel O

il

Gasolin

eHeat

Hydroge

n Jet

LiquorsLP

G

Methan

ol

Natural G

as

Oil for li

ghtingOthe

rSola

r

WithoutWith

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9x 107

Ener

gy u

se in

MW

h

Energy Carriers

Bio Gas

Biodies

el

Biomass Coal

Diesel

Diesel fo

r Hea

ting

Electric

ity

Ethanol

Fuel O

il

Gasolin

eHeat Je

t

Liquors LP

G

Natural G

as

Oil for li

ghtingOthe

rSola

r

BeforeAfter

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9x 107

Ener

gy u

se in

MW

h

Energy Carriers

Bio Gas

Biodies

el

BiomassCoal

Cold Wate

rDiesel

Diesel fo

r Hea

ting

Electric

ity

Ethanol

Fuel O

il

Gasolin

eHeat

Hydroge

n Jet

LiquorsLP

G

Methan

ol

Natural G

as

Oil for li

ghtingOthe

rSola

r

WithoutWith

Final  energy  savings:  6%  9%  (COM  2006/32)  

is  not  an  easy  target!!!  

Page 13: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Methodology  to  collect  objectives  and  attributes  

13  

This  work  follows  alterna*ve-­‐focused  suppor*ng  value-­‐focused  thinking1  to  iden*fy  desirable  decision  criteria  or  aBributes  to  evaluate  alterna*ves.    Alterna9ves:  Energy  efficiency  measures  or  groups  of  energy  efficiency  measures  constrained  by  target(s).    Three  decision  makers  were  interviewed:  

•   Prof.  Oliveira  Fernandes,  represen*ng  AdEPorto  •   Eng.  Paulo  Calau,  represen*ng  ADENE  -­‐  PT  •   Eng.  Raymundo  Aragão,  represen*ng  Brazilian  EPE  

 Main  sources  from  bibliographic  review:  

•   Direc*ve  2006/32/EC  of  the  European  •   L.M.P.  Neves,  Avaliação  mul*critério  de  inicia*vas  de  eficiência  energé*ca,  Universidade  de  Coimbra,  2004.  •   E.  Brown,  G.  Mosey,  Analy*c  Framework  for  Evalua*on  of  State  Energy  Efficiency  and  Renewable  Energy  Policies  with  Reference  to  Stakeholder  Drivers,  NREL,  2008.  

1:  R.L.  Keeney,  Value-­‐focused  thinking:  Iden*fying  decision  opportuni*es  and  crea*ng  alterna*ves,  European  Journal  of  Opera*onal  Research.  92  (1996)  537-­‐549.  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

Page 14: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Objectives  and  attributes  

14  

Objec9ves   AGributes   DM  Minimize  CO2  emissions  or  maximize  emissions  saved

A  natural  aBribute  is  emissions  saved  in  tons  of  CO2 1,2,4  

Minimize  payback  *me The  Payback  period   2  

Maximize  the  security  of  supply  /  secure  of  economy  

A  natural  aBribute  is  imported  energy  saved  or  imported  energy  not  used.  If  harmoniza*on  is  needed  this  can  be  measured  in  savings  per  cost.  

1,2,3,4  

Maximize  the  dura*on  of  measures  (life*me)

This  is  measured  by  the  expected  life*me  of  a  measure  (life*me  of  the  technology)

1,3,4  

Minimize  implementa*on  costs

This  can  be  measured  in  total  costs  of  a  measure  or  costs  in  rela*on  to  energy  not  used

3,4  

Maximize  local  air  quality  /  Minimize  health  problems  

A  natural  aBribute  is  the  par*culates  (PM10  or  PM2.5)  from  energy  use.   4  

The  minimize  peak  load  /  avoid  building  new  power  plants  

A  proxy  aBribute  can  be  electricity  saved,  since  the  methodology  followed  to  build  the  energy  system  accounts  energy  use  by  total  energy  used  per  energy  carrier  per  year  and  not  in  an  hourly  basis.  

4  

Prof.  Oliveira  Fernandes  (1)  from  AdEPorto,  Eng.  Paulo  Calau  (2)  represen*ng  ADENE,  Eng.  Raymundo  Aragão  (3)  from  EPE  and  4  refers  to  bibliographic  review.  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

Page 15: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Some  Results  –  non  dominated  measures  

15  

1600  measures  evaluated  for  all  4  sectors  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

x 105

0

1

2

3

4

5

6x 109

Cost

s (⁄

)

CO2 Emissions Saved (tCO2)

DominatedNon-dominated

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

x 106

0

1

2

3

4

5

6x 109

Cost

s (⁄

)

Energy Saved (MWh)

DominatedNon-dominated

Page 16: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Some  Results  –  non  dominated  measures  

16  

1600  measures  evaluated  for  all  4  sectors  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

-1-0.5 0

0.5 11.5 2

2.5

x 106

-20

24

68

x 105

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

x 109

Energy Saved (MWh)CO2 Emissions Saved (tCO2)

Cost

s (⁄

)DominatedNon-dominated

Page 17: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Ongoing  work  

17  Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

•  Upgrading  tool  to  es*mate  the  impact  of  EE  measures  in  all  7  criteria  

•  Performing  a  mul*-­‐criteria  “screening”  process  to  select  the  most-­‐fiBed  measures  to  form  EE  plan  sets  

•  Mul*-­‐criteria  evalua*on  of  EE  sets  to  choose  the  most  relevant  

Page 18: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

Possible  integration  with  GIP  

18  

Drivers  Proxy  values    

(Portugal  -­‐  2006)  Examples  of  data  

sources  Needs  of  hot  water  per  day  per  household  

111  l   Surveys,  studies  

Temperature  difference  between  the  cold  water  and  desired  hot  water  

45oC   Sta*s*cs,  studies  

Ownership  of  the  technology  or  the  end-­‐use  by  energy  carrier  

%  Surveys,  studies,  

sta*s*cs  

Number  of  households   3,829,464   Sta*s*cs  Number  hours  of  use  per  light  point  per  household  per  year  

236   Surveys,  studies  

Number  of  light  points  of  each  technology  

5  (Halogen)  4  (CFL)  

3  (Fluorescent  Tube)  13  (Incandescent)  

Surveys,  studies  

…   …   …  

household  size     107  m2   Sta*cs,  surveys,  studies  

Model  Based  on:  • Iden*fying  the  main  end-­‐uses  • Iden*fying  the  end-­‐uses  drivers  • Iden*fying  technologies  to  sa*sfy  the  end-­‐uses  

• Finding  methods  to  translate  drivers  into  energy  use  

Possible  iden9fica9on  of  most  fiGed  technology-­‐oriented  EE  

measures  to  apply  to  GI  to  fulfill  desired  targets  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design  

Page 19: NEXT%GENERATION%ENERGY% …web.mit.edu/mppgreenislands/gip/Workshop_Presentations... · 2011. 7. 2. · next%generation%energy% efficiency%program%design% phdstudent:gustavosouza%

19  

Thanks  

Next  genera9on  energy  efficiency  program  design