Upload
reese-anderson
View
34
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
NICE Guidelines on Community Engagement. Professor Chris Drinkwater NICE Community Engagement PDG. What are the challenges? What works? What should government and local statutory agencies do? Why should we bother?. Framework of NICE Guidance. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
NICE Guidelines on Community Engagement
Professor Chris DrinkwaterNICE Community Engagement
PDG
• What are the challenges?
• What works?
• What should government and local statutory agencies do?
• Why should we bother?
Framework of NICE Guidance
Aimed at policy makers, commissioners and providers including V & CS, community representatives and members.
• Prerequisites – challenges?• Infrastructure – what do agencies need
to put in place?• Approaches – what works?• Evaluation – why bother?
Prerequisites/Challenges
• Coordinated implementation of the relevant policy initiatives.
• Commitment to long term investment.• Openness to organisational and cultural
change.• A willingness to share power, as
appropriate, between statutory and community organisations.
• Development of trust and respect among all those involved.
Organisational and cultural change
• Identify how the culture of public sector organisations supports or prevents community engagement.
• Manage conflicts between communities (and within them) and the agencies that serve them.
• Incorporate community views into induction and in service training.
Levels of engagement and power
• Negotiate and agree how power will be shared and distributed
- defining project objectives - resource allocation - decision making• Jointly agree ways of working
Incre
asin
g c
om
mu
nit
y p
art
icip
ati
on
, em
po
werm
en
t an
d c
on
tro
l
Community control
Delegated power
Co-production
Consultation
Informing
More
appro
priate
and a
ccess
ible
se
rvic
e a
nd im
pro
ved u
pta
ke
Impro
ved h
ealth
sta
tus
& r
educe
d
health
inequalit
ies
Service outcomes
Intermediate social outcomes
Health outcomes
Pathways from community participation, empowerment and control to health improvement
Enhance
d c
om
munity
em
pow
erm
ent
impro
ved s
oci
al &
mate
rial c
onditi
ons
Impact
on s
oci
al c
apita
l
Jennie Popay (2006)
Infrastructure/Challenges
• Partnership working – will LSPs, LAAs, and CAA make a difference?
• Joint training for staff and community members.
• Accessible local venues and need to think through wider accessibility issues.
• Area-based initiatives.
Approaches/What works?
• Recruit and train people from local communities to plan, design and deliver health promotion activities.
• Use existing forums and networks.• Start with what the local
community feels is important.
Evaluation
• Identify and agree objectives with members of the target community.
• Be clear about the theory of change required to achieve success.
• Use a mixed-method approach and make use of participatory research.
Why Bother - Paradigm Shift
20th Century – formalising provision of professional knowledge through systems of training and provision (hierarchical/paternalistic)
21st Century – need to “fully engage” the public as co-producers of health (collaborative partnership)
Health,individual and community oriented preventative action
Health
Hazards
povertypoor housingunemploymentpoor food & nutritionpoor education
Environmental hazards
Community
oriented
preventative
action
Individually
oriented
preventative
action
Intersectoral action for Health. WHO. 1986
Best Value for Alzheimer’s
NICE – drugs to delay progression only available for people with moderate symptoms (MTS over 10).
(5,000 + words of newsprint)
Annals of Internal Medicine – 15 minutes of exercise 3x per week for people over 65 reduces risk of Alzheimer’s by 40%. Greatest benefit to the most physically frail.
(600 + words of newsprint)
Joining-up Locally to Address Inequalities
LA PCT
Public & patient engagement Engaging frontline staff
Public Health Team
Health
NeedsEquity audits
Evidence
SettingsStaff
Services
Outcomes
Locality clustersvaluing diversity
Community development
Community engagement
Training / employinglocal people
Community action
Locality clustersplurality of providers
Shared quality & outcome data
Collaborative approaches
New ways of workingPartnership
TRUST
CONTINUITY
LSPs
NICE Community EngagementWeb-link
Quick Reference Guidewww.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PH009CommunityEngagementQuickRefGuide.pdf
Full Guidancewww.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PH009Guidance.pdf