87
AD-A1 7 0 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA F/6 13/6 NMEIRICAL OPTIMIZATION FOR INTERNAL EXPANDING BRAKE.U UUCL E MAR 81 M PEER NCLASSIFIEO NL mmhhhhhhmmhm mIIIIEEIhIhIEE lEElllllElhlhI IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIu *IIIIIIIIII IIIIN

NMEIRICAL OPTIMIZATION FOR INTERNAL … OPTIMIZATION FOR INTERNAL EXPANDING BRAKE.U ... D. STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS ----- 14 1 ... converted to thermal energy bj …

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

AD-A1 7 0 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA F/6 13/6

NMEIRICAL OPTIMIZATION FOR INTERNAL EXPANDING BRAKE.UUUCL E MAR 81 M PEERNCLASSIFIEO NL

mmhhhhhhmmhmENumIIIIEEIhIhIEElEElllllElhlhIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIu*IIIIIIIIIIIIIIN

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOLMonterey, California

• t!

THESISNUMERICAL QPTIMIZATION FORINTERNAL EXPANDING BRAKE

by

" ,XORDECHA I/ PEER

MarelIM81 - //

Thesis Advisor: G. N. Vanderplaats

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

L\ - •

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION Of THaIS P"6 fRon D.EWm.

REPOR DOCUMENTATION PAGE 8*3 OAD COMPLETINORM1. REPORT NMUER jGOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CAOGK~~ HUON

4. TIL.Krm subttle)S. TYP or REPORT 6 PERIOD COVERED

Numerical Optimization for Internal Master's Thesis;Expanding brake March 1981

S. PERFORMING ONG. 41EPoPT NMB~ER

7. AUTHOR(*) 9. CONTRACT OR GRNA-T NuMSERt(.J

Mordechai Peer

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION HNK AND ORESS 10- ROGAM ELEMENT. PROJECT. TASKAREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS

Naval Postgraduate School

Monterey, California 93940

11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME ANC ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATS

Naval Postgraduate School March 1981IS. NUMBER OFPAGES

Monterey, California 93940 8 ae1.MONITORING AGENCY NAME A AOESS(Ol dlff e 11MM Conevoljgin Office) S6. SECURITY CLASS. (of thee ,fuW)

Naval Postgraduate School unclassified

Monterey, California 93940 IS&. 01CLSI IC ATION/OWN GRAING

14. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (Of11114 flePO)

* Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstrat 40100 lot D*..h It f gre. 1mm RaPit)

IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

19. KEY WORDS (Cnens et reverse side ifoneser aw *miftr AV ee UMAube')

Brake, internal expanding rim brake, clutch, brake temperature,optimization, numerical optimization

20. ABSTRACT (Cm.Umm 40 eeOW01* a11411 81 00ee..eY aiirb Melb 1411001aA,)

/This report deals with design optimization of tinternal-txpandingIfim Brakes. A computer program was developed to calculate theactuating force, torque,stopping time and drum temperature.The drum temperature is calculated by the finite differencemethod. A comparison of results has been made using a simplifiedequation that is in common use in engineering texts.Numerical optimization is shown to be a convenient tool for brake

DO I 147 EITION OPPIMOV 69I1SOBSLETE Unclassified

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OFP TNIS PAGE (Whose mlos

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

Numerical Optimization forInternal Expanding Brake

by

Mordechai PeerMajor, Israeli Army

B.Sc. Technion, Haifa Israel, 1970

Submitted in partial fulfillment of therequirements for the degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

From the

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

March 1981

Author: A c- A c oh.

Approved by: .bod 44 Ad~,h 7 iL4S

Thesis Advisor

3 eaeSecond Reader

Chairman, partment of! ;cal Engineering

. -. Dean of Science and Engineering

2

ABSTRACT

This report deals with design optimization of Internal-

Expanding Rim Brakes. A computer program was developed to

calculate the actuating force, torque, stopping time and

drum temperature. The drum temperature is calculated by the

finite difference method.

A comparison of results has been made using a simplified

equation that is in common use in engineering texts.

Numerizal optimization is shown to be a convenient tool

for brake design.

Accesion For _

nTI S GRA&IDTIC TA ElUnannounced L

4f4 to---

D i t r Ibui I,./_-

Av.iiabl-i'tY CodesAkvra iln/or

3Special

3I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION ..................- 11

II. INrERNAL-EXPANDING RIM CLUTCHES AND BRAKES -12

A. GENERAL MECHANICAL PRINZIPLES-------------- 12

B. FRICTION FUNDAMENTALS AND MATERIALS----------12

C. BRAKE DRUMS ---------------------------------- 13

D. STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS ------------------- 14

1. Assumptions ----------------------------- 14

2. Pressure Concept --------------------------- 143. Actuating Force and Torque Calculation----15

4. Rate of Heat Generated and Deceleration---17

E. SURFACE TEMPERATURE CALCULATION--------------- 18

1. Assumptions ------------------------------- 19

2. Temperature Analysis ---------------------- 19

a. Thegry -------------------------------- 19b. Formulation --------------------------- 20

F. BRAKE DUTY CYCLE ------------------------------ 21

III. OPTIMIZATION -------------------------------------- 22

A. INTRODUCTION ---------------------------------- 22

B. DEFINITION OF TERMS ------------------------ 23

C. THE OPTIMIZATION PROCESS-24

D. COPES AND SUBROUTINE PN&LIZ- 26

IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRAM------------------------27

A. GENERAL PROGRAM ORGANIZATION ------------------ 27

B. SUBROUTINES ----------------------------------- 27

1. Subroutine ANALIZ------------------------- 27

2. Subroutine INPUT -------------------------- 27

3. Subroutine TEMP--27

4. Subroutine TEMA --------------------------- 28

5. Subroutine BRAK --------------------------- 286. Subroutine OUTPUT---------.......-28

V. TESr PROBLE AND RESULTS-.........-29

VI. TEMPERATURE RAISE-SI&PLIFIED CALCULATION ---------- 32

4

VII. CONCLUSIONS- 314

VIII. RECOMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE INVESTIGATION ....-. 34

APPENDIX k: LIST Of PARAdETERS --- 47

APPENDIX B: INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROBLEM DECK PREPARATION--50

APPENDIX Z: STANDARD DECK STRUCTURE----------------------53

appendix D: COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING--57

APPENDIX E: FIGURES ------------------------------------ 65

LIST OF REFERENCES -------------------------------------- 83BIBLIOGRAP---------------------------84

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST ------------------------------- 85

5

SYMB2LS AND ABBREVIATIONS

A. ENGLISH LETTER SY4BOLS

a Distance from pivot to the center of rotation (m).

A Are& of one lining shoe (M2,.

b Width of friction material (m).

B. Biot modulus.1

c Specific heat (J/Kg- °C).

C Thermal capacity (J/C).d Distance from actuating force to the hinged pin (m).

dc Rate of deceleration (m/sec. ).

E Kinetic energy (J).

f Frictional force (N)

F Actuating force (N).F0 Fourier modulus.

g Gravity constint (m/sec2 ).

h Convection heat transfer coefficient (W/32 IC).

k Thermal conductivity (W/m-OC).

Mf Friction moment (N-m).

M Normal moment (N-m).nN Normal force (N).

p Pressure between lining and drum at any point (N/I2 ).

Pa Maximum pressure between lining and drum (N/m2}.

Q Heat generated (W).

r Inside drum radius (m).

R Wheel radius (mi.

Rth Thermal resistance (°C/W).

t Tize (sec.)

tk Thickness (m).

T Temperature ('C)

T0 Torque (N-m.

V Velocity (m/sec.).

V0 Volume (M3').

W Vehicle weight (N).

6

S. NOTA'ION

R.. The thermal resistance between node i and theij

adjoining node J.TP The temperature of node i at time step p.

1

GREEK LETTER SYMBOLS

e The angle between the hinged pin and an element

area on the lining.

6 The angle at which the pressure between the lininga

and drum is maximum.

U Friction coefficient.

1c Coll friction coefficient.

11h Hot friction coefficient.

c Thermal diffusivity (m2/sec.).

A Finite increment.

7

LIST 0? TABLES

Table

1. Results Befora Jptimization ---------------------- 35

2. Results hfter The Optimization-....-373. Optimized Results-Simplifiel Way ------------------ 41

4. Results With Dimensions Achieved by Simplified

Way------------------------------------------------ 45

8

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure1. Dynamic Representation of a Brake-65

2. Brake Assembly -----------------------------------66

3. Finite Difference Model of the Drum-67

4. Blozk Diagram of the Program68

5. Maximum Inside Drum Temperature Vs. Inside Drum

Ralis -------------------------------------------- 69

6. Stopping Time Vs. Inside Drum Radius-------------70

7. Tocgue Vs. Inside Drum aadius-.....-71

8. Maximum Inside Drum Temperature Vs. Drum Width----72

9. Stopping Time Vs. Drum Width --------------------- 73

10. Torque Vs. Drum Width ----------------------------- 74

11. Maximum Inside Drum Temperature Vs. Drum

Thizkness ----------------------------------------- 75

12. Sto.ping Time Vs. Drum Thickness ----------------- 76

13. Torque Vs. Drum Thickness ----------------- 77

14. Maximum Inside Drum Temperature Vs. Theta2---------78

15. Stopping Time Vs. Theta2 ----------------------- 79

16. Torque Vs. Thet12--------------------------------- 80

17. Two Variable Function Space-Width and Thickness---81

18. Drum Temperature Vs. Time-Zomparison--------------82

9

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The aathor gratefully acknowledges the aid he has

received from the following faculty members; Professor G. N.

Vanderplaits whose generosity, assistance and patience were

appreciated greatly. Professor D. Salinas who gave of his

time and enginsering expertise. Professors P. F. Pucci and

M. D. Kelleher for their assistance with the heat transfer

analysis.

Thanks also to the personal at W. R. Church Computer

Zenter f o their assistance with the computer work involved

in this thesis.

10

I. INTRODUCTION

Brakes are mechanical devices for retarding the motion

of a vehicle or machine by means of friction. Because of the

similarity of their functions, many clutches may also be

included here, assuming centrifugal forces are accounted

for.

A simplified dynamic representation of a brake is shown

in Fig. 1. Two masses with inertias, I, and 12 r rotating

at the respective angular velocities w, and W 2 (one of which

may be zero), are to be brought to the same speed by

engaging the brake.

The friction brake has three basic elements; two

opposing friction surfaces and a mechanism for forcing the

friction surfaces into contact. Whenever a friction brake is

eagaged to Join two members having relative motion, there is

a period of slip which may last several seconds. This slip

is one of the chief merits of the friction brake; i: absorbs

siocks iad prevents excessive torsicnal stresses on the

power transmission system. On the other hand, slip is the

limiting factor in friction clutch and brake performance;

for heat is generated in proportion to slip, torque

transmitted, and period of slip.

The following parameters are of interest in analyzing

the performance of these devices;

1. The actuating force.

2. The torque transmitted.

3. The temperature rise.

4. The 3lip time.

This report deals with Int-rnal-Expanding Rim Brakes.

This formulation also applies to internal-expanding clutches

if centrifugal forces are accounted for.

LI

II. INTERNAL-EXPANDING RIN CLUTCHES AND BRAKES

A. GENERAL MACHANICAL PRINCIPALS

A brake or clutch assembly, uses a brake shoe to which

is attached a friction material, called lining. The liningis riveted or bonded to the brake shoe as shown in Fig. 2.

The brake shoe is pivoted at a fiKed point and the other end

is subjected to a force which presses the shoe in contact

with the drum. The force between the brake and the drum is

radial as the drum rotates. If a point on the rotating drum

surface first makes contact with the shoe at the end nearest

the pivot, the shoe is termed a "trailing shoe". If it first

makes contact at the other end the shoe is termed "leading

shoe,, the latter giving a higher braking torque than the

former for a given braking force.

The friction between the lining and the drum creates

heat which is basically the conversion of energy of motion

of the vehicle or machine to thermal energy at the friction

surfaces, namely the lining and the drum. This heat is then

dissipatel and absorbed by the drum by conduction,

convectioa and radiation into the atmosphere.

B. FRicrroN FUNDAMENrALS AND IATESIALS

Friction mechanisms, such as brakes, are systems for

converting mechanical energy into heat. Several basicfactors affect friction and wear of materials used in brake

systems. The main factors are temperature, pressure, speed,

surface roughness, and type of material. Some organic or

molded friction materials show no change in friction

characteristics with pressure, while others such as

sintered-metal materials decrease in friction coefficient as

pressure is increased. For metallic friction materials there

is also a decrease in coefficient of friction as speed

12

increases. Temperature effects upon the coefficient of

friction vary widely with the type of materials used.

In a two-shoe internal expanding brake there is a

tendency for the brake drum to deform under hard

application. Drums become elliptical and the force to do

this is guite high and contributes to friction force.

A brake or clutch friction material should have the

following characteristics to a legree which is dependent

upon the severity of the service:

1. A high and uniform coefficient of friction.

2. The ability to withstand high temperatures, together

with good heat conductivity.

3. Properties which are not affected by environmental

conditions such as moisture.

4. Good resiliency.

5. High resistance to wear, scoring and galling.

C. BRAKE DRUMS

One of the primary functions of a brake drum is that of

absorbing and dissipating the heat developed during the

application of the brake. A brake drum is a heat sink into

which heat goes after it is created by the rubbing friction

of the brake lining contact to drum. The brake shoe and

lining permanently fixed on the axle, when actuated,

contacts the drum under pressure to cause the friction to

stop the vehicle. The energy of motion of a vehicle is

converted to thermal energy bj the brake assemblies. A brake

drum must have the capacity to absorb and dissipate this

heat energy within the limits of the brake heat input. If

this is not the case, the drum expands and the brakes fade

or fail. The greater the mass of the drum, the more heat it

can absorb and store until such time as the heat can be

dissipated by convection and radiation [Ref. 1].

An ideal brake drum would have the following

characteristics;

13

1. High structural strength to resist bursting forces.

2. Uniform coefficient of friction.

3. Hard surface to resist scoring.

4. High heat conductivity to rapidly conduct heat away

from braking surfaces.

5. High emissivity factor to radiate heat from the drum

surface to the atmosphere.

6. High heat storage capacity to store heat from

successive brake applications until it can be

dissipated.

7. Good aachinability to permit boring of the drum.

D. STATIZ AND DYNAMIZ ANALYSIS

1. Assumptions

In developing the equations, the following

assumptions have been made;

a. The pressure at any point on the shoe is proportional

to the moment arm of this point from the pivot.

b. The effect of centrifugal force may be neglected.

c. The shoe is assumed to be rigid.

d. The friction coefficient is a linear function of

temperature and it does not vary with pressure, wear

and environment.

2. Pressure Concept

ro analyze an internal shoe refer to Fig. 2, which

shows a shoe pivotel at a fixed point with the actuating

force acting at the other end of the shoe. The mechanical

arrangement does not permit pressure to be applied at the

pivot, therefore the pressure at this point is zero. If the

shoe rotates through a small angle about A, the radial

movement of any point on the arc of contact, is proportional

to the moment arm of this point from the pivot. Assuming

that the material of the brake lining and support obey

Hooke's law, the pressure at this point will also be

proportional to this moment arm. The distance is

14

proportional to sin e . Therefore, the relations between

pressure at any point and the maximum pressure, pa' will be

given by the following formula;

P PasinG- sine (1)

a

From this formula it can be seen that the frictional

material at the heel, contributes very little to the braking

action, therefore it is better to begin the friction

material it an angle 61 greater than, say 0.15 ral. It can

be seen also that the pressure will be maximum when 8 =900

or if the toe angle 02 is less than 900, then the pressure

will be maximum at the toe. For good performance it is

recommended to concentrate as much frictional material as

possible in the neighborhood of the point of maximum

pressure [Ref. 2].

3. Actuating Force and Torque Calculation

From Fig. 2, it can be seen that the differential

normal f3rce on an eleament area of the lining will be;

dN = pdA (2)

where dA is an area element of the lining and it's magnitude

is;

dA = rbde (3)

In Equation 3, r is the inside drum radius and b is the drum

width. Sabstituting for p and dA gives;dN4 pabrsin(

dN a sine de (4)a

At the same point the differential frictional force is;

df = UdN (5)

where U is the coefficient of friction.

15

A..

rhe actuating force, F, can be calculated using the fact

that the summation of the moments about the hinge pin is

zero. The moment due to frictional forces is;

Mf =ef 2(r-cos0)df (6)

where a is the distance from the pivot to the center of

rotation. Substituting the value of dF and integrating

from el to 02 gives;

Mf = siae {(cos8 1-cos 2 )+ r(sin201- sin28 2 )} (7)

f sine 2a

where is assumed to be constant along the lining.

Similarly the moment due to normal forces is given by;

M = OeasinedN (8)n

Substituting the value of dN and integrating

from e to 82 gives;pabra

Mn = sinea-{0.5(6 2-01 )-0.25(sin6 2-sin01 ) (9)siOa

rhe actuating force must balance the moments,therefore;

Mn-Mnf

d (10)

where d is the distance from the hinge to the point of

application of F. rhe torque applied to the drum by the

brake shoe is;

= fe2rdf (11)

After substituting the value of df and integrating ;

To = sine (cose-cos6z) (12)sinea

16

4. Rate of Heat 3enerated and Deceleration Calculation

The differential rate 3f heat generated by an

element area of the lining is equal to the velocity of the

inside surface of the drum relative to the lining , times

the differential frictional force acting on the element

area;

dQ = V df (13)r

Assuming the brake is on a vehicle wheel with a radius of R,

the inside surface velocity is equal to;

V V (14)r R

where V is the velocity of the vehicle and is a function of

time.

If V=V(t) then V =V (t) and the heat generated will be alsor ra functi3 of time. Substituting the values of V and df and

rintegrating from ei to 82 , we get the following formula for

the heat generated at any time t,

P bu 2a rQ(t) = sin ()(cosei-cose 2)v(t) (15)

4 . The kinetic energy of a vehicle of weight W is given by;

E =(.)v (16)

Note that if the brake is on a four wheel vehicle, there

will be eight shoes. Assuming all are leading shoes, each

will stop one-eight of the vehicle weight, so W/8 must be

used in Eguation (161. The rate of change in the kinetic

energy is;

dE ,W ddE (E) V~ (17)

From the energy conservation law the rate of change in the

kinetic energy is equal to the heat generated;

17

Q(t) dE (18)

Substituting the value of Q(t) aad dE/At, it is seen that

the velocity V(t) cancels and so the deceleration is not a

function of time. Therefore the deceleration, dc, is;

dV _ P a r-dc = dt (W sine()(COSel-cos6 2 ) (19)

The velocity at any time is;

V = V.-dct (20)

where Vi is the initial velocity. Substituting the velocity

i. Equation (16), yields the rate of heat generated as afunction of time,

Pabl4rP bP 2

Q(t) (-)(cose1-COSe 2 )(Vi-dct) (21)a

Ia this study the friction coefficient was taken as constant

up to a temperature of 900C and after 90 0C, decreases

linearly to zero at a specified temperature, Tmax;

T <90 C

P --E - (T-90) 90 0C < T < T (22)

0 T >Tmax.

where p is the cold coefficient of friction and Ph is the

hot coefficient of friction.

E. SURFAZE TEMPERATURZ CALCULATION

Since the function of a brake is to convert kinetic

energy into heat, surface temperatures of brake linings and

drums are most important. Therefore it is necessary to know

the temperature of the mechanism during and after any stop.

The temperatures were calculated by the finite difference

method.

18

1. Assumptionsa. One dimensional heat flow-The heat flow is from the

inner surface to the outer surface of the drum.

b. Constant heat transfer coefficient.

C. No heat dissipated by radiation.d. The heat is generated on the inner surface.

2. remperature Analysis

a. Theory

The differential equation to be solved in order

to find the temperature in the drum, based on the

assumptions, is;

2 = TT (23)

with the following boundary conditions:

at 1=0 heat is generated,

at x=tk heat is transferd to the atmosphere by

convection.

In the equation above k is the thermal conductivity, a is

the ther2al diffusivity, t is time and tk is the drum

thickness. This .luation can be solved by the finite

difference method "Ref. 3]. The finite difference model

used here is shown in Fig. 3. The rate of change with time

of the internal energy of a node i is approximated by;TP'lTP

AE _ ocVo 1 (24)At At

where p is the density, c is the specific heat and V0 is

the drum volume.

Now define the thermal capacity as

Ci = Dici AVoi (25)

rhe forward difference equation for all nodes and boundary

conditions is;

19

TP-T P TP TPRJ 1 C 1 (26)R th, ij i At

where th,ij is the thermal resistance

Solving the above equation for TP+ 1 gives;1TP A

p+l= (QpMR A 1 )TP (27)th,ij C i Rth,ij

The thermal resistance can be calculated from the geometry

and boundary conditions "Ref. 3]. To ensure

stability At must be equal or less than the following

nodal relation;C

At < ( ) (28)

th ij

With the assumptions made, the drum can be viewed as an

infinite plate, with heat generated at the surface of the

first node, as shown in Fig. 3. it is assumed that in every

drum, there are two shoes and that both are leading shoes.ptherefore, two times QP must be taken.

TP~l TP(2Qi J + (1- )TP (29)

th,ij 1 i th,ij

b. Formulation

In the computer program 5 nodes were taken. In

order to :heck accura-y, the program was run with 7 and 10

nodes. in each case the result was the same within 5 0C.

rhe heat is generated in the inner drum surface. Therefore Q

appears in the formula of temperature in the first node and

fir all the other nodes Q is equal zero. With the

assumptions mentionel above, the heat transfer through the

drum is solved as a heat transfer problem through an

infinite plate, with heat generation at the inner surface

aad with a heat convection boundary on the outer surface as

shown in Fig. 3. Equation (29) =an be simplified using two

dimensionless parameters, Biot and Fourier modulii,

20

B. = hAx (30)i k

FO aAt (31)(Ax) r

The final equations for calculating the temperatures at the

nodes now become;

For the first node;

Tl 1 2QPAtP+- C1 + (1-2Fo)TP + 2FGTP (32)

For the interior nodes;

TPl p + Tp + (1 2)TP} (33)i ~ ~ 1 0T_ +1 FO

For the last node;

T P+I - 2Fo{TP +B.T.+ (..-B.-l)TP} (34)n n- 1~ 2F 0 i nl

F. BRAKE DUTY CYCLE

In addition to tae parameters mentioned above the design

of a brake depends on the initial speed, final speed, number

of stops, and the rest time between each stop. In this

analysis a general daty cycle was considered so that the

initial speed, final speed ani the acceleration period

between stops can be different for each part of the design.

In the design examples presented here, a vehicle was

stopped four consecutive times with the following cycle;

Initial final Rest

Speed Speed

m/sec. a/sec. sec.

1 25.0 0.0 20.0

2 25.0 0.0 20.0

3 25.0 0.0 20.0

4 25.0 0.0 -

21

III. OPTIMIZATION

A. INTRODUCTIOV

Engineering analysis using the digital computer has

become commonplace. It is less common to use the computer

to make the actual design lecisions, such as sizing of

structural members or placement of mechanical linkages. This

may be largely attributed to the fact that fully automated

design requires techniques that ire unfamiliar to much of

the engineering community.

In many engineering problems, it is necessary to

determine the minimum or maximum of a function of several

variables, limited by various linear and nonlinear

inequality constraints. It is seldom possible, in practical

applications, to solve these problems directly, and

iterative methods are used to obtain the numerical solution.

Machine calculation of this solution is, of course,

desirable. The CON3IN program is available to solve a wide

variety of such problems [Ref. 4].

C03MIN is a FORTRXN program, in subroutine form, for theminimization of a multi-variable function subject to a set

of inequality constraints. The basic optimization algorithm

is the Method of Feasible Directions (Ref. 5]. The user must

provide a main calling program and an external routine to

evaluate the objective and constraint functions and to

provide gradient information. tf analytic gradients of the

objective or constraint functions are not available, this

information is calculated by finite difference. While the

program is intended primarily for efficient solution of

constrained problems, unconstrained function minimization

problems say also be solved, and the Conjugate Direction

Method of Fletcher and Reeves is used for this purpose

[Rqf. 6].

22

B. DEFINITION 3? TERMS

Most lisciplines have a unique set of nomenclature used

to describe the concepts within that discipline. Some of the

commonly sed terms in numerical optimization are summarized

here.objective- rha value of the function which is to be

minimized or maximized during the optimization process.

Synonyms ire cost, merit and payoff. The common mathematical

designation is F(X). In the present study the objective was

to minimize the material in the brake drum.

Design variables- Thi parameters to be changed

during the optimization process in order to minimize or

maximize the value of the objective function. Synonym;

decision variables. rhe common mathematical designation is

the vector X. Design variables considered in this study

include, drum thickness, width, the angle between the hinged

pin and the end of the lining, and the distance from the

pivot to the center of rotation.

Inequality constraints- one-sided conditions which

must be mathematically satisfied for the design to be

acceptable. The common mathematical term is G(X)<O or

G(X)>O. If the ineqality condition is satisfied on G(X), the

design is acceptable, (feasible). If it is not satisfied,

the design is not acceptable (infeasible) . Constraints

considered here include, vehicle stopping time, maximum drum

temperature, and actuating force.

Side constraints- Upper and lower bounds on the

individual design variables X . The common mathematical

representation is X .< Ii< Xi.

Design space- The n-dimensional mathematical space

spanned by the vector of design variables I.

&ctive constraint- Constraint G. (X) is called active3if its value is zero (or near zero for computational

purposes.

23

Inactive constraint- Constraint G. (X) is inactive if

JJG.(X)< O.

7iolated constraint- Constraint G (X) is violated if

3, (X) >0.J

C. THE JPTIHIZATION PROCESS

The general design optimization problem can be stated

mathematically as follows: Find the set of variables Xi,

i=1,2....a, which willminimize F(. (35)

Subject to:

Gj(X) < 0 j=1,2 ..... m (36)

X 1< X. < Xu i=1,2 ..... n (37)

Vector X contains the set of independent design

variables X., i=1,2....n. X may represent, for example1

width, thickness, and angles in the brake optimization. The

objective function used here is the drum volume.

Equation (36) defines the ineqality constraints imposed

on the design. For example, if the temperature on the inner

drum surface must not exceed a specified value T, the

associeted design constraint becomes, in normalized form

T 1 < 0 (38)Ti

The lower and upper bounds on the design variables,

given by Eq. (37) , limit the region over which the functions

F(X), and G(X) are defined. These constraints are often

referred to as side constraints because they form the sides

or bounds of the n-dimensional spaced spanned by the design

variables K.

If all the inequalities of Eqns. (36) and (37) aresatisfied, the design is said to be feasible; if any ofthese conditions are not satisfied, the design is not

24

feasible. If F(X) is a minimum and the design is feasible,

it is also optimum, or at least, a relative optimum. Note

that because the objzztive and constraints may be nonlinear,

there may be multiple minima in the design space that cannot

be identified using current methods. While this is a matter

for concern, since it is desired to find the true optimum,

it must be remembered that the same mathematical conditions

exist if the design process is not automated. However, using

optimization techniques, it is a simple matter to restart

the optimization from several initial points in the design

space and thereby improve the pribability of obtaining the

true optilum design, a process that would be quite time-

consuming in manual design.

Equations (35)-(37) define the nonlinear constrained

optimization problem. If Eqs. (361 and (37) are not imposed

on the design, the optimization problem is defined by

Ej.(35) aLone and is therefore an unconstrained minimization

problem.

Most 2onlinear optimization algorithms 1pdate the vector

of design variables by the iterative relationship;

Rq = Rq-1 + agq (39)

where q is the iteration number, vector S is the direction

of search in the design space, and the scalar a is referred

to as a aive parametar which,together with 9, determines how

such the vector i is changed luriag the q-th iteration. An

initial design defined by i must be supplied. The

optimization process then proceeds in two steps. First,

the direction S, whizh improves the design, is found, and

second, the scalar a , is determined which improves the

design as much as possible when moving in this direction.

rhe process is repeated until there is no further design

improvement, indicating that this is the optimum attainable

25

design. ?ir further details see Ref. 7.

D. COPES AND SUBROUTINE ANALIZ

In order to simplify the use of CONMIN and to further

aid in the design optimization process a Control Program For

Engineeriag Synthesis, COPES, was developed by Vanderplaats

[Ref. 7]. COPES is the main program (recall that CONMIN is

written in subroutine form). The user must supply an

analysis subroutine with the name ANALIZ, which will

calculate the various parameters. This subroutine has three

segments; INPUT, EXECUTION, OUTPUr.

All parameters which may be d9sign variables, objective

functions or constraints are contained in a single labeled

common block called GLOBC3.

Copes Terminology

The OPPES program currently provides six specific

capabilities;

1. Simple analysis, just as if ZOPES was not used.

2. Optimization-Minimization or maximization of one

calculated function with limits imposed on other

functions.

3. Sensitivity analysis- The effect of changing one or

more design variables on one or more calculated

fun:tions.4. Two-variable function space-knalysis for all specified

combinations of two design variables.

5. Optiaum sensitivity- The same as sensitivity analysis

except that, at each step, the design is optimized with

respect to the independent design variables.

6. Approximate optimization- Optimization using

approximation techniques. Usually more efficient than

standard optimization for up to 10 design variables or

if multiple optimizations are to be performed (Ref. 7].

26

IV. DESCRIPTION OF TKE COMPUTER PROGRAM

A. GENERAL PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

A functional block diagram of the program is presented

in Fig. 4. A general description of the subroutines

contained in the program is given here. Appendices A

t.rough D discuss the preparation of input data, list the

important computer program nomenclature, and list the

program.

B. SUBROU7INES

1. Subroutine ANALIZ

Subroutine ANALIZ organizes the basic analysis used

in the optimization. It controls the reading of the initial

design Jescription and calculation of the values of the

objective function, constraints, and all other parameters

necessary to solve the problem. COPES/COUHIN updates the

design to minimize/maximize the objective function,

iterating until no further iprovement in the objective

fanction is possible without violating one of the

constraints. COPES/CONMIN calls subroutine ANALIZ to obtain

the function value luring the optimization.

2. Subroutine INPUT

rhis subroutine reads all input data associated with

the brake analysis. Instructions for problem deck

preparation are given in appendix B.

3. Subroutine rE.PR

rhis subroutine calculates the heat transfer

constants such as the thermal capacity of each node and the

resistance of each node, determines the time increment in

order to insure a stable solution, and calculates the rate

of heat generation. In order to calculate the temperature of

each node, it calls two subroutines. From subroutine BRAK it

27

obtains the deceleration needed to calculate the rate of

heat gemn.ratel and from subroutine TEMA it obtains the

temperature rise of each node. Then it calculates the

temperatur-s during the time that the brake is not in use.

This subroutine is also c.apble of calculating the

temperature rise of a drum when a constant rate of heat

dissipation is given.

4. Subroutine rEIA

This subroutine calculates the temperature of each node.

As mentioned before, the heat is generated on the inner

s:irface, and on the outer side of the drum the heat is

dissipated by convection. The formulas used were developed

by the finite difference method, and are given in sectionII-E-2.

5. Subroutine BRAK

This subroutine calculates the torque, actuating force,

aad the friction moment of one shoe. It also calculates the

drum volume and the decelerat-ion of the machine. The

subroutine takes into consideration a constant friction

coefficient until a temperature of 90 0C is reached and a

linear decrease in the friction coefficient for higher

temperatures. More details are given in section II-D-4.

6. Subroutine 3UTPUT

This subroutine echos the input data and prints out

the thermal and meahanical information for the brake. An

example of the output obtained from this subroutine is shown

in Table I and Table 2.

28

V. TEST PROBLEM ANiD RESULTS

The computer program was tested with the data specified

in Table 1. The objective function which was minimized was

tae voluze of the drua material. Design variables were the

drum width, the angle between the hinged pin and the end of

the lining, the ratio of the pivot to center of rotation

distance to drum radius, and the drum thickness. The side

constraints (limitsi on the design variables were;

Design Lower Upper

Variable Bound Bound

1. (3) width,b 0.0 80 mm.

2. (51 Theta 2, 1.2 rad. 2.5 rad.

3. (12)Ratio,Bd 0.1 0.9

4. (18) Thickness,tk 40 mm. No bound

The number in parentheses is the location of the

variable in the COM33N block in the computer program.

Constraints were imposed on the actuating force F, the

maximum temperature, T , on the inner surface of the drummax

and stopping time, t.

Constrained Lower Upper

Variable Bound Bound

1. (91 Force,F 200.0 N-m 2500.0 X-m

2. (251 Time, t No bound 7.00 Sec.

3. (31 Temperature,T No bound 230.0 0C

The vehicle which weights 25700.0 Newtons is stopped

four consecutive times from a velocity of 90.0 Km/hr to

zero, with an acceleration period of 20.0 sec. between

stops. The values of the design variables and the

constraints before and after optizization are;

29

Before After

aptimization Ootimization

Objective

Function

Drum Volume 0.754 E-03 ml 0.159 E-02 ml

Design

variables

Width 0.08 m 0.08 m

Theta 2 2.10 Rad. 1.92 Rad.

a/r 0.75 0.755

Thickness 0.010 m 0.020 m

Constraints

Actuating

Force 2815.1 N 2086.3 N

Stopping

time (last stop) 7.04 sec. 7.00 sec.

Temperature

after list stop 348.7OC 229.2 0 C

Note that the objective function increased as a result

of optimization. This is because the initial design violated

constraints on stopping time and maximum temperature.

Further results are listed in Tables I and 2. In

addition to optimization, a sensitivity analysis of the

design variables and a two-variable function space analysis

for width and thickness were performed. The graphical

results ire given in Figs. 5 through 17. The results can be

summerizad as follows;

a. The effect of changing the inside drum radius with all

other design variables held zonstant;

As shown in Figs. 5-7, for small inside drum radii the

drum temperature is very high. The stopping time is

long and the torque is low. Inside drum radii over 130

mm give reasonaDle drum temperature and stopping time,

for the example considered.

30

b. As seen in Figs. 8-10, the affect of changing the drum

width with all other design variables held constant is

the same as described above.

c. The effect of changing the drum thickness with all

other parameters held constant is; For a drum thickness

up to 6 am, the stopping time and drum temperature are

consilerably high. Over 16 zm thickness, the stopping

time e ains almost constant. For a small thickness thetorlue is very low due to the high temperatures. For

thicknesses over 20 mm, the torque remains about

constant.

d. The effect of changing the angle between the hinged pin

and the end of the lining is; For a small e2 angle the

stopoing time is 7ery long because the torque is low.

The stopping time becomes reasonable when 6 2 >1.8 Rad.

2bvi:usly there is an increasa in the drum temperature

as e2 increases but the ovecall change in temperature

is small.

a. From the two variable function space, Fig. 17, it can

be seen that the constant volume line and the constant

temperature line are almost parallel, this leads to the

conclusion that for the cycle taken, the drum is a heat

sink, and the amount of heat dissipatel by convection

during this cycle is small.

31

1I

VI. TEMPERATORS aAISE - SIZMPLIFIED CALCULATIOV

A simplified way of finding the temperature rise of the

drum is by using the equation;Q = WcAT (40)

and setting Q equal to the amount of heat generated using

Eguation (21) from section II-D-4. This equation is in

common use in engineering texts (See, for example, Refs. 2

and 8). The temperature rise calculated this way, is the

average temperature of the drum, and not the temperature on

the interface, which can be much higher (depending on the

rate of heat generated). Extreme temperature gradients cause

distortion and excessive surface wear. Therefore it isn't

always acceptable to use the simplified formula. From

experience, it has been found that the surface wear

increases dramatically as inerface temperatures approachL430 to 5) OF (205 to 260 °C), [Ref. 8].

A comparison of the temperatures calculated on the inner

drum surface, outer drum surface, and the average drum

temperature calculated, using equation (40), is given in

Fig. 19. The graph shows the temperature rise for a vehicle

stopped from a velocity of 90 km/hr. From this graph, it can

be seen that the drum temperature, based on equation (40),

after the vehicle stopped is about the average temperature

of the inner and outer surface temperatures.

The results show that the drum will reach an uniform

temperature of about 58 0 C, in 15 sec, after the vehicle has

stopped.

Calculating the temperature with the simplified formula,

can lead to errors in the time needed to stop the vehicle.

Because the temperature calculated with the simplified

32

formula is lower than the temperature at the friction

interface, the calculated friction coefficient is higher

than the actual friction coefficient. Therefore the

calculatel stopping time will be shorter than the real

stopping time. All this is true , provided the friction

material behaves as assumed in seztion I-D-4.

Because high temperature is detrimental to both the

stopping ability and the wear characteristics of the brake,

it is important that the interface temperature be calculated

with reasonable accuracy in design. Fig. 18 clearly shows

the temperature differences resulting from the two

approaches.

This difference in results is compounded when the

simplified equation is used for design. Table 3 presents the

design results based on the simplified approach. This design

represents an apparent material savings of 27%. However,

when this optimum is analysed using the finite difference

heat transfer solution, the maximum temperature is 268.8 0 C

and the last stopping time is 7.54 sec. This time violates

the constraint by 7.7%. Perhaps more importantly, the

temperature at the interface of about 269 0C would surely

lead to premature failure. Therefore this design is clearly

*. too unconservative to be acceptable.

33

VII. CONCLUSION

In summary, a numerical optimization program is an

effective way of finding a solution to an engineering

problem, provided reasonable care is used in formulating the

problem.

VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE INVESTIGATIOUS

The study has shown the feasibility of using numerical

3ptiaization in the design of Internal-Expanding Rim Brakes

with two leading shoes. Further studies on the same design

may be pursued by eliminating some of the restrictions. For

example;

1. To add heat dissipation by radiation.2. To investigate drum temperatures for a drum with fins.

3. To take into consideration changes in the surface

pressure as a function of friction coefficient.

4. To r-peat all the calculations for a drum in which

there is one trailing shoe and one leading shoe.

5. To add the effect of centrifugal forces for clutches.

34

000~~ a 0 aOOO OO OO 0ONC~ In 't 4O~ 0 .- A '0 r- Q 7J Q 0 - N m~ -- LA 0 tP- .50

z z ~ J NN NN z z z tz z m z

m 00 a I

I :D (Jm 1% n i 0

a 0 0 n

+I +I t 01 f If 1 1 0 f i

4 w 000000000. c0 0 *n LULU Z UJ L 6 LU D L

44 r-% W6600000000W

W LU wA U. !- c z 0.~*~Z~ ~ :r--O O 0 0 0 0

I. 44 + I ' 0 >I N I I if II (A XI-U CC LUJ 0. P" _ULL .7 ".D .

4. 004 0M :D U UJ U.00cc ~ 0 wa 6L. Q. 0 a U

N mO 'A xJ WU X o

0~ Z wZ -

I I if I I 9 0

W I 4 35

0 000 0 0 0 000000a0 0 0e1)0000 00 0

4x44 444 444444 L

ri (0

0 0 -4 f% LU 0

0 LU LU LU LU 00 LU00 A-. 4. 00 c n0

I.- -44f a!x I r 08~~~ C0@-. : e . L

0 aA '0 '0 (; o o!J '

01 If + + 1- 00 0If o I I 1 1 LU uj Z X:

L - t . I 00 0 L LU LU LUP- 0 co 00 0 -c

0LU I- ( U.1 LU LU 'A-4 U

I f It z l'- 16- 6-CL 0 e z

w z a Lj 1%LU ( 36

4 Ln Q~ P- w 0% 0 -* N m 't in 'o r- w Q% 0 N4~%

zz z zz z z 2z 7zz z z zz zz z

vI) A)

w z

CNN

L6 LL N

0%z w4

0I.- z z44 4c

ca .4 V) (A 0149 4 cm A (A

b- ae z ZL

9'--

I zzIL. 9 L" LU ZLL I L- cc -J -Z N

I-I-- cc -O

z a - -

I 1 40 M- 0L-4 IU Z w W -~W 0

00 x x >

4 9 JZ LU Wicc 1(Zu CO -j~Z

37

0 00 00000 0 0 0 0 0 00 n0

IA . - co (% 0- N m 'r Ln 1O 1- 0 C" 0- N (n It LA

0000m0 0 P000 ,000 0 %0 00 0 00m4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

~~~ Oww

Q.L 000

-4 NC of00

_j~~W 000 .

C. 01 00C)~ 0 0

S-4 0 C1 ) % 0

S 0 (J I 0 N. N I-+ + I U

C3 N0 N 0 NO

0Dr-00 N0

Ico m U 10 N 0 (

0 0004'00

0000 Z LU U

-N I.- 01 14 x x

UIa i

LI4

38

0 00000000 0 0 0 0 00 0 000~ ~0 - rN rl Xt -0 r- m~ 07 C -4 N In 4 6n o r- 0000 - '-4 -4- 6 .4 -- 4 -4 N N N NV N N (% N~ N

LA

0+ +

* ~LU LU t LU LU W u 'U UJ LU U.) L LUJ

4 44S X 0 0000 00In0 000

cc~ ac 0x 0 00 00 (5n0e* 00+ I 0 Po - 1!3 - LAO0 m -0 00LU Wj L m .r'- m19 en r- cm N r 4 4

OOOOOLA co+.~ 4 4 I It a% If 11 1 11 11 11 H1 1 It 11 II

LUi LU U LU LU -4 14 LU U. i Lu0-4 co0 0 0 0 QI. (..). LI z0 LA 0 nA 1'- 0 0 LL 0 *Z Lu U. :3N r- 0' 0 LU LL LL LU OW i

L % U, 40 H 11 I 0 U.L u. cc 0 4.- 0 Q ~ ~ lLJ W L Ll. z 'U

z " -0 0 LA. L

44ci : <U I->wLa 4 0 .J1 4.CA

I-- (n f w - le Q > wXU.; L

X-I I-I I- Z >LJ Q *.4 0 9- Z LU: LU

39

-I Cf S L( ' f~ ~ 0 -4 0 ~ 0~ .0m It .dA- 10 1 z (% -t 0 't

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04444444a444444444 0 0

z zz zz z zzz z zz zz z

LU P-0

I~1 IN-

0 a.

aU LU LU LU LW I-

C% rt Ln 00 04 c

> 10 0 -4 0I- LU > - 7 (A 0

LJ 1- (1 M. I 0 -0X Z -: c1 00x LUL LU 11

ZXZOW%,, LU0 i. 4% x 0%

LJ~ 0 I-Ic LU '- t~- C4l V) I- )- L) co

0 49U. Z 4 0c I

40

t L00 00 0 1% 0000 00000It tn m Ln LA InU A A inz '0 10 10 .0 4O '0 %0 Q

0

4L.

LL.-

'0a I z -

aI 4 c A L"

01cr wf Ln- 2-

-J ,L -U pL - 0U c -

w i w U..14 Ij > Z .J t

W~ Z W Z~z m

0 W " 4 >

Cf. - ) ui 00

44

r- -000 *-1- -0%000wc0w0 00 0m00w0 0

-4 -40 O

xn(I 0 Ln WLU 0

LU~0000

=. 0 0 -4 r-f C-L-j c U 0% co 00

0 0 % A) ~UJ

rl-~Q ?0 0 1-4Lu.J . V t

0 0~0 U 4

+ 44 1 0 0 C3 QL LU LU LU LUi w w w N

3I - 0 0 IA CL m

M000

c 0 m 4U '40 N w -0 ' N .f .-4 wU w.4 w ws fli cc 0 0 0 LU LaU-

> r- 00 3% NU L LU>j -4 0n if %0 c 4

0i Nn N N% c 0 a 0 0

I L Ja 00 0 00.0

4~~~~- -. WNO 00 I- I

*U * uj ULU L U L

000 AO 00 (A

420 0

.~~ o '- C 0 0 0 0 n 0t ' 0 0 -0'0'<'0%0'<%<000<00000

M-

00

0 .4 0I

0 0 in0

+ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 + +. .4 4 + 4.4.I 1 f I 1 f I t if I 1 1w 0 w w' W LU0 Lii LL LU LU L U L ..

0 44 L. 0 U. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0kn m 00 0 L.00 00 00zwL

Ln 4 Ul 0 4.i If 0n U.- LL, lty 0 00

00 P r- V) 0 w 0 0z

LU vi LU L U -0 Ll . z LU

0" z Io0 0 - aI x. U.D

o 4c4 0' 00 LU U.0.U U

uU -0 ki w' I U. x LI 0

m =) LU 8. L. X

1, UJ- aIL > uU. x LU '.4 U ' Z wL I X .

x C9~ - Z -4 0 C L 4 -1 x U

43

L o r- oo 7% 0 (1) -t~- 4 - P N N N N N

Ln f4A i lAl I LN in M tin In

0 0

00

:z 44444 0'. LU J. wU LU L

'It It4

. * * .0 4

44 44

0 ' 0 -4 In 10 t A~ r- (D 0a% o o~ ND r- . n

tn LN In In In LA LA tn 1%In LA LN LA LIn n 4~A iAIn A in LA L %

)i I

4,C3,

LU L

U.1I

4U w IlI l l

-. 1

LI,

V) Il w 0 4

V)141 aaU.I

U.1 U. 3(j z (x WI "0 0

CA =I IA .:

X9 19 aI

01 QI N ~ ~00 N4 LA

-4 N m -. tn QO I- w ON 0 -4 N m -t LA '0 t.- m ON% nLA L L tA ALA LA '0 00 o 'o 'o O o 'o o--

tn .A In tn Ln in A UNL Ln LA L LA m A Ln ui Ln LA L L t tA LA0 0000 0 a000 00 0 00015D000 00a0

~U.

0 0U

LU Ul LU

N c

I a 00 ~0 C 0N0 ~ ~ ' r-L L U L 0 LA A L A0 'LA I'dP 4 t-I

0 10 Cl N' 0'

0 0 0 00 0 LU LU 1-- 0 0 o * 1+I 4 + 1- 0 10 0 r-

it 11 If if if 11 LU WL j rI-. 4LU 0 '

I- LU> 0o LA LA 0

LU U -. 4 0. LUUS J I- LU m. 1I 0 w~ w -

z 44 * w0 I-- x-L x x xwU LI L w w 0n -aoa "" :

Z ~ x~ z- La~f W~ -A004 .9I 4- 4 0 0)m f-L A L M (

U.1 '& 40X 1-00 -- Q L m

46

APPENDIX A

LIST OF PARAMETERS

A complete listing and description of all variables used

ia the program, is not practical. The variables listed in

this appendix are common to several subroutines of the

program and will assist the reader in a study of the

program. The Global location is the location of the

parameter in the common block called GLOBCM. This common

block is the means by which information is transfered

between the subroutines and the C)PES/CONMIN program.

Global Fortran Math. Definition

Location Name Symbol

1 RI r Inside drum radius (m)

2 T T o Torque of one shoe (N-m)

3 WDTH b Drum width (m)

4 PRSA p Pressure between lining

and drum (N/I3 2 )

5 TETAI e, The angle between the

hinged pin and the (Rad.)

begining of the lining

6 TETA2 e2 The angle between the

hinged pin and the end

of the lining (Rad.)

7 FRMNT Mf Friction moment (N-m)

8 ANMRT kn Normal moment (N-2)

9 ACFRC F Actuating force (N)

10 C d Distance from actuating

force to the hinged pin(m)

47

11 Q Heat generated (J/sec.)

12 RD a Distance from pivot to

center of rotation (m)

13 C!IU Cold friction coefficient

14 HNIU Hot friction coefficient

15 TMIU Friction coefficient at

any temperature

16 SRFC Drum surface area (m2)17 RO Outside drum radius (a)

18 THK tk Drum thickness (m)

19 DX An incremental thickness

(m)

20 RIIER R Wheel radius (m)

21 W W Car's weight (N)

22 DCCE dc Deceleration (M/sec.2 )

23 TOT Total time (sec.)

24 ECEN a Ecentricity (a)

25 NWRT Write statement control

26 TIME t rime (sec.)

27 VOL Vo Drum volume (m3)

28-32 TEPL(5) T Temperature at time p 1

(sec.)

33 NWR Write statement control

34 NWRA Write statement control

35 NWRQ Write statement control

36 NEL Number of elements

37 3SEG Number of segments

38 ?1 T Constant

39 G g Gravitational constant

40 K k Thermal conductivity

(J/m2c)

41 HCNV h Convection heat coeff.

(W/m2 -c).

42 SPHT c Specific heat (J/Kg-C)

48

43 aHO P Density (Kg./M )

14 DTAU Time increment (sec.)

45 DFTM T ilax. temp. difference(3 C)

46-50 TEMP T Temp. at time p (sec.)

51-57 RES Heat resistance (OC/J)58-63 TC C Heat capacity (J/ 0 C)

64 BIO Bi Biot moduli

65 FUR Fo Fourier moduli

66-72 NVT Control parameter

73-79 VT Control parameter

80 NELO Number of elements+1

81 NELT Number of elements+282 TETAA e The angle at which the

apressure between the

lining and drum is

maximum. (Rad.)

83 ACOF Constant

84 TII T Initial temperature(3 C)

85 ZMAN t Time increment (sec.)

86 NSHU Number of shoes

49

APPENDIX B

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROBLEM DATA PREPARATION

Although the procedure is straight forward, preparation

of input data for te program requires attention. Errors are

easy to make and difficult to locate. Input data is

described here for the brake analysis. For instructions on

data preparation for optimization see Ref. 7. Input data

should, in general, follow the steps outlined below. The use

of the standard FORTRAN Eighty Columm Coding Sheet is

recommended. Intege. constants aust be right justified in

the appropriate field. There are eight input cards, read by

subroutine INPUT, to describe th? initial design, material

properties and constants. Card format is given in

parenthesis followei by specific instructions where

n-cessary.

1. First Card (I10) - Duty cycle information.

Cols 1-10 : Total number of consecutives stopsand accelerations (NSEG)

2. Second Card (I10,3F10.01 - Duty cycle information.

a. Cols 1-10 : Control number.

1 means-deceleration,

2 means-brake not in use,

b. Cols 11-20 : Velocity at start of deceleration.

c. Cols 21-30 : The velocity at the end of the

deceleration.

A. Cols 31-40 : The time the trake is not in use.

3. Third Card (5110) - Thermal analysis information.

a. Cols 1-10 : Number of nodes (NEL).

b. Cols 11-23 : An integer number that controls the

amount of printout when detailed

output is required during the

vehicle deceleration. The amount of

50

lines written, depends on the

stopping time and time increment.

(NWR).

a. Cols 21-30 : An integer number that controls

the amount of printout when

detailed output of the temperatures

is required during the period that

the vehicle is not in use. TheL amount of lines written depends on

the period length that the brakes

are not used (NWRA).

1. Cols 31-40 : An integer number that controls the

amount of printout when detailed

output of the temperatures are

required during the period of

constant heat generation. (NWRQ).

e. Cols 41-50 : Number of braking shoes in the

machine.

4. Fourth Card (7F10.0) - Brake dimensions.

a. Cols 1-10 : Inside drum radius (RI).

b. Cols 11-20 : Drum width (WDTH).

c. Cols 21-30 : Drum thickness (THK).

d. Cols 31-40 : Ratio of distance from pivot tocenter of rotation and insideradius (RD).

e. Cols 41-50 : Drum density (RHO).

f. Cols 51-60 : Angle between hinged pin and the

begining of the lining (TETAl).

g. Cols 61-70 : Angle between hinged pin and the

end of the lining (TETA2).

5. Fifth Card (7F10.0) - Thermal and friction

information.

a. Cols 1-10 : Heat conduction coefficient (K).

(real number).

51

b. Cols 11-20 : Heat convection coefficient (HCNV).

c. Cols 21-30 : Specific heat of the drum (SPHT).

d. Cols 31-40 : lax. temperature difference between

cold friction coefficient and hot

friction coefficient (DFTM).

e. Cols 41-50 : Cold friction coefficient (CMIV).

f. Cols 51-60 : Hot friction coefficient (HMIV).

g. Cols 61-70 : Initial temperature (TINI).

6. Sixth Card (2F10.0) - Machine information.

1. Cols 1-10 : Vehicles weiaht (W).

b. Cols 11-20 : Wheel ralius (RTIER).

7. Seventh Card (5F10.0) - Analysis constants.

a. Cols 1-10 : maximum pressure between lining

and drum (PRSA).

b. Cols 11-20 : Constant 3.1415927

c. Cols 21-30 : Gravitational constant (G).d. Cols 31-40 : Increment of time (ZMAN).

a. Cols 41-50 : The angle of maximum pressure(TETAA).

8. Eight Card (110.0) - Print control.

Cols 1-10 : An integer number can be zero or 1.

If zero (or a blank card) - only

the final results are printed.

If 1- the temperature at time

increments are printed.

52

-t Ln 'o r~- co 0 -4 C4 'nl 'r U-% I- CO 3 0 .- N C4 't LA 0 r.-AM LA nA UN Ln LA tA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA tA LA LA LA LA LA UN LA

zzZzzzz z z z zzz z z zz zz z z z z

44 4 4 4 4 44 4 4 4 4 4

Q Cc zx (Az ce C

I- a

zM

cm LU 0

a 0 04

CL 0 Z j c

44L

44

-5

00000 0 rCA00r '0 07%0 000000 1-00000Ln LA C\0 cfl' Q 10 0 10 0 1 0 4 C'Q 10 a 4 .4 0 1 10 4Lfla'0 '0 a0 04 0 C)0 '0 ' 0'0. '0444 '0 '04

< < At 4 4 44 4< 4 <4% < < 4 % -i -1 < < 4 < 4 -4 4cT z zz zz z z zzz zz zz z zz z z z

44 44 44 44 44 44ON44

.7

* c1o

(L Cr V) -c

0 0 -4 .

(I 4 04 0%00

*1 54

in. Q 4 A . r- W~ 1% 0 - 14 fn 't in 0 P. OS) 0' -4 N (4 -r Ln

-0 '0 0 -0 '0 %0 o0 0 a0 0 '0 0 0 '0 0 '0 '0 '0 '0 0 10 10 %a -4

4 < <At 4444 4 44 4 4444 <4 4 44<4 4d

000

10

N --

8 0n04 0

0 o 0 cc0*U m' N 0 r- o

N zN ON

O 1 49 0 0

0n N m LC% '-A

00- -4 0 0 in W 0 a

LA . -. 4 . 4 S55

It 0 kn Ln Ln L n Ln W Ln Ln~ '0 0 10 '0 '0,0 10 10 10 .0 10 '0 '0 -0 40 10 40 10 '0 0 40 -0 4

C

0 -t 0

0 It -00

I-n

6~1 (T.0 ~N~~~ N LoA

01

56~

*.. Adi -

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZI4444444444444444ZZZ ZZZ ZZZOzZ ZZIZZZ ZZ1444444444444-k. 444 4 44 4 44 4

Cm .:-' .

Z- 4?I

z 04 -e

1l I- vAIoU-4 O~

= NU O-Z ft c-ON.DZ 0'W -4z O* C.-

0" V) .Wu jd .4mNC

- NJ 4- Pi- 1SC

- .JLU e-- . LLJ4 .

LU x .4 5 -cS *.W >0C. d4 W L0. cc x .ZxLI7. LI

CL LA 0.... .4

ujg 0It -j e -J-JI.-- < ^

z NJO-A i.. 'JcD L

Win 041'4 cv)4 * JOUJ - t57 - Q-

4"

00000000000000000000000000

2ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

I--4e4u4 44

o- -Z w

l- -u -. 6-

Ln~J am-4J

(A .X.14.W.M.-O .

e-XCLI0 - 4-.

t4 -0 LJ -4 .Z-Z0X3LU i 0-I.-

1- .4-XAz )~ -fol.Z

JO -Z .,- w

0. 0l-c(0 *I- 1- 0d--co tn.GAL CY> Zf-j 0

a fO: - - C X -

Z .b -Z

-t -.- 9w " 0:D .. X0.Z. W _j J

(LW X49La> LnO Zu- . 0-e~ -L

S-O .ZM .Wz- ~-wa. -40

I-U =Z .-. 4 - NM MM w .3)-.g-

'-a CIO:).x X 0

ul ..o.j~aCi 0 .0 000000 .- iLL-Z30O000090~ UO' L LLP-Sq

0 000-4 CI 1

58

OoOO00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

cyo~ O~OO~%OO0OOOQ0O.-

W-x-

4: a2=0*

- .Z ' a

4 -01- .4-CNZUZZ4%0m2

OZf-I'-Z

... LUO.I--

i'- OkiJ a41-

Si) &nLL) a

oc WI-C -LUJ -W 0.0 ft0. 0I-(0.F-

xLU -(-n tA 0

LU 0U Sj-lZ - t

w -l---.jj 0l -4 .4 4)

v4*0 *U U.; 0J -0 *M %V~. Cd> Z wZ * * ftI

cc Lu .Ot:)1 oz M- .4)~ . -=' i oct +WU.7 o- )( " f4*( - 1

(A 0 I~ )0I 0* X0 + W4 ILL F-...&flE- - S -0A Wo- * LU .1> 0* 0 P>ii 0

W J m J-Nao 4 11 1 >- ZLL *N 04 1- LU"Z'-=Z +.. +S. -. o. M* < <. - -zN 11~ 1,

LU% ftU~ -10 z-.1-. .W- *1 LUO If MW If P.-W d It *CA'j * I2 -t i-.M-.i0ZZ 0 If 0.-. -Zj. I

- )(n2-xo-dzz -4Z 44 .42 0- ' -ZWW 4 a 1Zj) 1149oz rL 020g if OZw~ 11 It 0-P4d-gogg CA oo.-.-ozz CL CC--O"w I. o

Li11.W4I.. Z3-N '-Z2 W 11 CAZd)U U w .. 4.,.a -z 'w Doawwo-o-~ Xo~wcLWw~ UJou f-I.

.4 -4VJf4~ 44 49LULU l'-

59

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz- zz.zz6

O0 .0000000000000000000000

- L

+ -f

LU -z (m 0-

LOa

LUWO

+ % . - 1-

x I.-C.

Lu U. 00

aJ Z 0 --a ILII - -04M oi~

A -o

*U - M. 11- 0~ ~ LLU

MO-0 mI-- l -.-

0 09. I-LU 3 W O- * wmc (n 0.0c x Q4uzwMW-

LU-C Z~ 0 L Z-LJ 0 -g .. i-WNO W4- x aU a o 0 -4 o- --

I-* 00 cc n *% 0 -Z-.f -X ow.(.lU o x (.DI- ft3 .c: fwtOZ (21 L

*Wao-Z0 a- 00 :DD wooo4 V) *Q 1I- J0

tn- Z) 0 Z1 :D - y t--is -o d )4Q*LU *. Wa0%X 00 0 M Q- W -4 4

NI1MIAo a a. c3NrD Q z-z if .41j --z z> <1 Z

N~~I.~4c A W e --!D LULdV7 cc 0~J W

AaO.. ~ 0 0.Z WW.. - ..

WNAC~a4 * 4 4 4 0* LQQ -aN 04*i t.-40

A - LU 6 0 (~. - 4 I

OO00 04 04f- w mm m 0000000 00400

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Lu LU LU wi

CL L 0 - (n .

Lu Lu LU Lu -v9 %

9- 0- 0 0-6 ~0. Z<

C5 a -00 0

aJ .j 00 ON0 _-- 7-Z a..a. a. a.

LU ) 4 LiU Luj ILU

1. $.0 *- tiz Z- SczP-P 00O I-LO C- I-sO sO LUOI.Xgcc 0i 0-' 0v 0c 0c4 A ~ M kn cL)

Q r 4 -- w w~ -> r-": c 0 0- - 0~ 0 9-3 O UX

La La *I aa -I Ou Lo OW4LA0 <ZO 0 0 0 0 00D41io19

:3 OOZ 0-0 3b 9- 1000Mz Z- 0 1-X z- Z "- if 1 *Xz O

-. 0 %lum W4 4 LU +*U-~ 11 4 *L *cL aC0- I- ~ i- SI-c.,ip I-I-. wo~wC.D

- 0 IJ -4 -0.a LoJ( -> O..-0% 4 S aSS S.~:

3 3 Z'.4Z (~ -t~l Zw-.4 3 ui~61l

O00M 000000000000-(mlto* O00

ZzZzzZZzzzzzzzZZz~zZzzzrz

-ur -Z.

LU e'Nzz- .*

>ZLUjOZ. 6.

LUJ Z< -=t-J* 43. 'J

LU ~ ~ LU -m

> -eccuwo.- -LU .JU.(J.) "P-s4

z wc,.0>c3o. I.4 -Ztz cc ..i

a4-3LJ4W 3 LuJLU -wL -= 04- U. Zcc 01,-cct -4* % -

4q <<4IOU:)1- LlUCC **C 4-U. I

LU -wL -* -* +. *

A.O..1-X -J- + M

I J<4wzg.I -4 " +4 =t -OML~.0 -X LU .- e-z ow . -..

LU -% w . .J-.0- x W~4- 00.w.W4I wu z

ZU LU a Q -. 4 +I.- U aUw.uCa>%w- -4 LU

-C 4XCc-ccoe -- I -

cic Qj -o0~n ZM- 0. cc4 i Un -. 444 -<

4 qccce. Lu LL'.3 Z.314Emm 0 4~* .

u.iSZQ -Zu.*W..j- 0 .jLU I--LUD= - - 7(3* N W..lz 1--cCO* *zcc I ZO.

LU J:X~zww * "M

11 1Z1Z -. u. j 11-11 -

CO ozorw ~~-.0-c0 OZ ccLUXL- wNC. Ix

4-4

62

,ooo-m -titm~O-co~

44444 44 4 4Z~zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzZZZZzzZZZZZZzzzzzzZz~z

4t -LJ4 g

CA 4oO0AC

cc LU I- L4U Of 49ZLI- -. 0

Q- zZl0 Iic 1- z~ .4

ZX -=P-4 ifz -f( a"

.1 2 x -a..o-I - *

QLQV UUJ~-( 6 W0 0.1.1. 4 X

w- 44N >OW - I.--I-4 -. - -- U1 MI o40 N'1. U.1J

01-7390O.JW4 0W - I--

Wgq.4W 5-0-0%

:n1. .. JL .. 4 ftr OX4Lf.. *n LL1-4 ol_-1-ON 0% 0.W0 l- N4L1 U.

In -0 .2-Jt 0I-~' 1 - LU 4 4' ~ ~ - V- ~ ni. ~ -'4 U. N 4 .- I <~~ 4Z 0-'%Z 1.e 0 0*L 0 L4- -U J L

ccI- n JU.@ O." I (A W4W1 -00 - W sLU. ~ w w*Z1- *(Je I- I.- ~ .. Lx (.1*o - 1-

U.Z( -Jo -Z - - .... vW C.,* -QCCI- aW Q wU q Qz wL u .. JBt3 . I* *Z.3 d) -* N%- X I cc 0

- JL Zc3I7N> w 0 .f %'44I*01- 00 ~ I U. 2

0 I-CjC o-- :)cc*.n- clc-*c - LL. U.C) "-ft"2~ sZ>00* *.-. 0"W 0 -%-L I % jN z LuccQ -c: 0ZO aW-- (5-Z hI ~I4.il * 0. 1-I4 2 49 2:

4c d U-ad 0 wU 0 *:D* 0 4 u..0 ce I - - C4 LA I.-

Q <QXo -4u* U.-o 'u i. 0= L LU* Z l-L Iw CA a otXXC AL CAOriEO 4 4 LuQ-Lfl 0 uC* Z - (n4 UL

U. : NVLJO: - 0LI SQ s I e Q

I U. It (

ootJj.)J . CX - CJZ --) QL J C..I

63

.4zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I- .U4 1Lz I L f

)OO00r0000000000000000000of04r U

I:k cL- UQWWO IIo- M-z L LU(AWu _j JO

14zzi-~L'QU G.N0j" XU<U yo -um -4 01 *zl.,L1:)L1 x

iac 0. U .)Z J

>ZUJOZ :of-%

Z-9 vx- 3 ie Z=X3 Ztn~Un w= 00000 =.-O.$ * On

!30,-Z - =-N - NN- -44.4 Cl)

-nxW0.b- cf m LO ox(-EZ ft*fl

QLL k..) C4 Am. 00 11'%% ~ f *gI-- O 04A. z4 -4 I, fl~u~notInNX-4

NC3J>0 "f U w o 0u 0 *. * * *&vrA a

0-304%= 1-Cf (~(%(JN

uIwL 0= ftl- :D ft 0 x SX aWwwLJLw -4 *%%0D-( cc 40r -Z 0 --4tnx a. .a -- N OUMLCCY 2.

"i b . .4~ 3 w ma. ".., na iti1it iit W-4 II cc x

LJJ-4 * 'J. ft =L. T.% JUn*%, . 0 O *%%LJ it )(-4 %.

0%- P- 'cOoO'. :) & C3N NNSI e- U.GJ= 1

g-- Lu (Jw~ wo IIQ _ M-N WO-w Af-xW-QI. x- - LWTWGWIo.Ntj.WW.1i

0 A W 1_j - .. 0 N oIIIju % Z L I.

- - W'Z OLU *L4 Ll .4 11 CCUN~~0 W 0 00 IJU .OIIUN

ce -'NZ3.L a a- 0 000 00

64.LI-L

APPENDIX E

W1 W 2

Clutch or Brake

Fig. 1 Dynamic Representation of a Brake or Clutch

65

p4

Direction of Rotation

A 62 Shoe

Lining

Rim

Fig. 2 Brake Assembly

66

Drum Thickness

AX

1 2 3 5

Heat Generated Convection BounderyCondition

Outer SurfaceInner Surface

Fig. 3 Finite Difference Model

67

COPES CONMIN

INPUT ANALIZ

OUTPUT

TEMPR TEMA

i,- -

BRAK

Fig. 4 Block Diagram of the Program

68

(z2

= E1-4

1-4

z

*1l

1 2 20 In -- a r)

N 0 cZtu cu cu c

(:))Od31 n~a3aINI XW

69V

U)

LIU)

z

tbb

cuj

(*03S) 3WI.L DNIddOIS

70

cr.

ix

C3

LLI 2

z

bD

(W-N) 3flowi

71

I

iT'

TO

68'

-4

2

II-

z2

2

-4ci,

-4

22-4

so'-f

bD-4f p us'3333 31S

31 -

72

.Iwo

.we

1r'4

-I-

bb

*:6.

04

U) U U) U VI

(003S) 3WID DNIddO.S

73

Nor

E--

74.

0J-%1

U)Li,p6 z

cz

C)

-4

'dW31wnma3alSI X2

75 29-

Le.

'S.

.mo

U 0

low 4 l

16 ~ ~ ~ 1 L ----AC33S)3WII!)N~~dO2

76)

Iw

*mF

91 " ,

((TS"i-. cW

.Is* 0 E-

(W-N) 3flowO

77

Sl

.4-I

8*1

raft'

(00) dW31wn~a alSN 'me

78s

ix

9.9-

902

.. 9-

(*03S) 3WIJ. DNIddOLS

79

EA

IxI

s8.1 1

m

0:

.4. 6

,. .0

(W-N) 3nomo.

o

Si

E-44

0a 0

00

0 PL4

*186 CO

0.

0W HIM

81 -

Cd)

-44 C)

-4

5.4 0.4

E. C)

5.4 C)

C) .;-4

ILL4

S -4-

4V 4 C)

Co. 3alNdW1wiaIlN

C 82

LIST OF REFERENCES

1. White, J. A., Bcake Dynamics, 1st Ed. Published by

Research Center Of Motor Vehizle, Research Of New

Hampshire Lee, New Hampshire, 1963.2. Shigley, E. J., Mechanical En.ineering Design,

3rd. Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1977.

3. Holma, J. P., Heat Transfer, 4th Ed., ScGraw-Hill 1976.

4. Vanderplaats, G. N., CONMIN- A Fortran Program For

Constrained Function Minimization, User's Manual,

NASA TMX-62282, August 1973.

5. Vanderplaats, G. N. and Moses Fred, Structural

Optimization By Methods Of Feasible Direction. J.

Computers and Stractures, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press, July

1973.

6. Fletcher, R. and Reeves, C. M., Function Minimization

By Conjugate Gradients, British Computer J., Vol.7,

No. 2, 1964.

7. Vanderplaats, G. N., COPES- A Fortran Control

Program For Engineering Synthesis. Course Notes, Engr.

Desiga Optimization, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey

California, undated.

8. Ranks, J., A Study In Pneumatic Brake Selection. Horton

Manufacturing C3., Minneapolis, MN 55414, undated.

83

-II I! .. . .

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Baumaeister, A. B., Mark's Standard Handbook for

3ngineers, 8th. Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1978.

Dusinberre, G. I1., Heat-Transfer Calculations by

Finite Difference, International Textbook Company,

1961.

Hanks, J. and Dayan, L., Efficient Clutching and Braking

of High Input Energy Loads, ASHE Publication,

S0-C2/Det-97.

Hannah, J., Mechanics of Machines, 2nd. 31I.,,

Edward Arnold (Publisher) Ltd, 1972.

Limpert, R., The rhermal Performances of Automotive

Disk Brakes, SAS 750873, 1975.

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST

1. Library, Code 0142 2

Naval Postgraduate School

Monterey,california 93940

2. Professsor G.N. Vanderplaats, Code 69Vn 3

Department of Mach. Engineering

Naval Postgraduate School

3onterey, California 93940

3. Professor David Salinas, Code 69Zc

Department of Mach. Engineering

Naval Postgraduate School

Monterey, California 93940

4. Defense and Armed Forces Attache

Embassy of Israel

3514 International Drive, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20008

5. Major Mordechai ?eer 2

Military P.O.B. 2128

ISRAEL

6. Dr. Jim Bennet

Engineering Mechanics Dept.

G. 3. Research .ab

Warren Michigan 48090

7. Defense Technical Information Center 2

Cameron Station

Alexandria, Virginia 22314

85