Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEEMarch 21, 2018
Audio recordings are made of this meeting
ITEM 1 REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF JANUARY 24, 2018 MEETING MINUTES
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
ITEM 2REVIEW OF MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORTS:JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2018
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
MSP OPERATIONS
JANUARY 2018
30,703 1,865
Operations Nighttime Operations
(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)
FEBRUARY 2018
30,000 2,072
Operations Nighttime Operations
(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)
36
,22
7
33
,82
7
34
,37
7
35
,65
9
37
,30
6
36
,68
9
33
,08
5
34
,59
5
31
,25
6
32
,61
3
31
,37
1
29
,03
8
35
,11
9
32
,68
6
33
,40
9 35
,54
2
37
,13
2
36
,88
5
32
,88
7
33
,96
9
31
,89
6
32
,35
6
31
,59
7
30
,02
0
34
,96
6
33
,29
3
34
,33
1 36
,75
0
37
,88
0
37
,88
7
34
,05
2
34
,90
6
32
,10
2
33
,10
3
31
,86
8
29
,82
5
36
,23
5
33
,97
1
35
,40
7
36
,29
2
37
,66
5
38
,51
1
33
,31
3
35
,02
7
32
,26
8
33
,09
8
30
,70
3
30
,00
0
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
JANUARY 2018
30,703 1,865
Operations Nighttime Operations
(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)
FEBRUARY 2018
30,000 2,072
Operations Nighttime Operations
(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)
MSP OPERATIONS
1,7
25
1,5
27
1,5
62 1
,91
5
1,9
01
1,7
37
1,3
17
1,4
22
1,3
75
1,5
47
1,5
11
1,4
87
1,9
67
1,8
54
1,7
66
2,0
10
2,1
27
2,0
29
1,5
73
1,6
25
1,6
32
1,8
40
1,8
71
1,8
04 2,1
24
1,8
74
1,8
70
2,4
21
2,9
77
2,6
29
1,7
55
1,8
17
1,7
87 2
,15
2
1,9
10
1,6
39
2,4
41
2,1
43
2,0
19
2,2
64
2,3
46
2,2
13
1,5
51
1,8
07
1,7
89 2
,11
9
1,8
65
2,0
72
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
ARR DEP
JAN – FEB RUNWAY USE
30,373ARRIVALS RECORDED
66.9%RUNWAYS 30L, 30R OR 35
33.1%RUNWAYS 12L OR 12R
30,330DEPARTURES RECORDED
53.8%RUNWAYS 30L OR 30R
45.6%RUNWAYS 12L, 12R OR 17
48% 48%42% 41%
36%30%
28% 32%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
M N S
RUNWAY USE
NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW
42% 28% 21%
NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW
41% 32% 18%
JANUARY 2018 FEBRUARY 2018
STAGE 3
STAGE 4
STAGE 5
14
.1%
8.8
%
11
.7%
0.0
%
0.1
%
5.4
%
0.3
%
4.9
%
6.9
%
0.4
%
1.5
%
0.0
%
4.8
%
0.0
%
0.1
%
0.0
%
5.4
%
11
.2%
6.1
%
6.9
%
0.7
%
7.9
%
0.0
%
0.9
%
0.0
%
0.2
%
0.3
%
0.0
%
0.5
%
0.1
%
0.5
%
0.3
%
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
CR
J2
CR
J7
CR
J9
E13
5
E14
5
E17
0
E19
0
A3
19
A3
20
A3
20
NEO
A3
21
B7
37
-8
B7
17
B7
33
B7
34
B7
35
B7
37
7
B7
38
B7
39
B7
57
MD
80
MD
90
A3
00
A3
30
A3
50
B7
62
B7
63
B7
64
B7
77
B7
88
DC
10
MD
11
CU
MU
LA
TIV
E C
ER
TIF
ICA
TE
D N
OIS
E L
EV
EL
BE
LO
W S
TA
GE
3 L
IMIT
S (
EP
ND
B)
2018 MSP CARRIER JET USAGE WITH CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVELSJAN - FEB
REGIONAL JET NARROWBODY WIDEBODY
SOURCE: USAGE DATA: MACNOMS; NOISE CERTIFICATION DATA: EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY
CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVELS REPRESENTED AS A RANGE TO ACCOUNT FOR MULTIPLE CERTIFICATION VARIABLES (WEIGHT, MODEL, ENGINE TYPE, AIRFRAME CONFIGURATION, ETC)
CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVEL RANGE
CARRIER JET FLEET MIX
MSP COMPLAINTS
JANUARY 2018
COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS
5,834 186
Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median
5.3 7 31 4
FEBRUARY 2018
COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS
6,018 176
Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median
5.0 21 34 4
NE
W W
EB
SIT
E
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
JANUARY 2018
COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS
5,834 186
Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median
5.3 7 31 4
FEBRUARY 2018
COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS
6,018 176
Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median
5.0 21 34 4
MSP COMPLAINTS
7,9
39
7,8
55
7,4
44
9,6
29 11
,50
1
12
,13
9
11
,13
8
9,0
75
6,2
64
5,2
27
6,0
54
6,9
77
9,9
74
9,6
76
8,7
20
12
,82
7
11
,66
4
12
,47
5
12
,22
2
9,2
44
6,9
55
5,9
13
5,5
47 7
,59
4
13
,19
6
10
,04
0
11
,06
3
12
,22
7
10
,87
8
12
,03
5
10
,83
1
9,9
83
7,2
41
6,3
18
7,4
57
12
,01
2
13
,24
4
13
,90
7
12
,55
9 14
,61
7
16
,29
3
16
,72
7
15
,28
2
10
,84
4
8,9
29
7,1
84
5,8
34
6,0
18
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JUL
-14
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JAN
-15
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JUL
-15
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JAN
-16
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JUL
-16
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JAN
-17
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JUL
-17
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JAN
-18
JANUARY LOCATIONS
124 AREAS WITH AT LEAST 1 LOCATION
0AREAS WITH MORE THAN 10
LOCATIONS – 0%
3 AREAS WITH 6 – 10 LOCATIONS –
2.4%
3 AREAS WITH 4 OR 5 LOCATIONS –
2.4%
118 AREAS WITH 1 – 3 LOCATIONS –
95.2%
FEBRUARY LOCATIONS
113 AREAS WITH AT LEAST 1 LOCATION
0AREAS WITH MORE THAN 10
LOCATIONS – 0%
1 AREAS WITH 6 – 10 LOCATIONS –
.9%
5 AREAS WITH 4 OR 5 LOCATIONS –
4.4%
107AREAS WITH 1 – 3 LOCATIONS –
94.7%
TOTAL COMPLAINTS
149AREAS WITH AT LEAST 1 LOCATION
9AREAS WITH MORE THAN 300
COMPLAINTS – 6%
19 AREAS BETWEEN 60 AND 300
COMPLAINTS – 12.8%
51 AREAS BETWEEN 8 AND 60
COMPLAINTS – 34.2%
70AREAS WITH LESS THAN 8
COMPLAINTS– 47%
TOP 10 LOCATIONS
FILED
8,067 (68.1%)
COMPLAINTS DURING THE PREVIOUS 2 MONTHS
8 OF 10 LOCATIONS WERE IN THE TOP 10
FOR NOVEMBER / DECEMBER DATA
172 (68.8%)
LOCATIONS FILED 10 OR LESS COMPLAINTS
SOUND MONITORING
JANUARY 2018
Time Above34s
TA65 per operation
291h 3m
TA65
Count Above1.99
N65 per operation
61,097N65
FEBRUARY 2018
Time Above31s
TA65 per operation
261h 17m
TA65
Count Above1.92
N65 per operation
57,731N65
38
7 H
39
M 4
1 S
47
4 H
50
M 3
5 S
45
7 H
11
M 5
4 S
48
8 H
40
M 4
0 S
47
0 H
28
M 2
5 S
45
1 H
39
M 9
S
44
7 H
42
M 6
S
49
6 H
43
M 2
4 S
35
2 H
20
M 2
9 S
37
4 H
36
M 5
4 S
33
7 H
44
M 2
6 S
26
8 H
15
M 4
8 S
43
1 H
8 M
58
S
43
6 H
40
M 3
2 S
47
4 H
6 M
9 S
48
3 H
12
M 1
4 S
47
4 H
44
M 2
5 S
50
0 H
27
M 4
7 S
45
5 H
51
M 1
S
51
8 H
27
M 5
5 S
48
4 H
41
M 5
4 S
44
7 H
0 M
21
S
34
2 H
53
M 1
3 S
36
3 H
21
M 1
5 S
52
0 H
10
M 3
8 S
50
6 H
10
M 3
2 S
47
0 H
22
M 2
9 S
49
9 H
53
M 5
1 S
48
7 H
26
M 3
1 S
50
3 H
50
M 4
8 S
50
0 H
41
M 4
9 S
54
3 H
51
M 3
8 S
49
0 H
4 M
28
S
38
8 H
27
M 4
5 S
36
3 H
58
M 4
5 S
39
1 H
31
M 5
9 S
48
1 H
6 M
28
S
50
9 H
7 M
5 S
51
3 H
41
M 2
6 S
48
1 H
47
M 7
S
45
4 H
29
M 5
2 S
50
6 H
47
M 3
7 S
44
4 H
17
M 9
S
50
5 H
44
M 2
3 S
43
7 H
46
M 1
4 S
36
5 H
26
M 2
5 S
29
1 H
3 M
14
S
26
1 H
17
M 5
S
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
JANUARY 2018
Time Above34s
TA65 per operation
291h 3m
TA65
Count Above1.99
N65 per operation
61,097N65
FEBRUARY 2018
Time Above31s
TA65 per operation
261h 17m
TA65
Count Above1.92
N65 per operation
57,731N65
SOUND MONITORING
77
,40
7
87
,09
8
88
,23
1
95
,13
8
92
,24
2
92
,01
8
85
,99
3
90
,83
0
68
,06
0
75
,41
5
68
,11
2
56
,93
0
83
,15
5
82
,74
4
89
,77
4
93
,82
7
95
,33
3
97
,91
9
89
,76
5
95
,85
9
89
,37
3
85
,90
9
70
,34
4
70
,42
4
98
,46
6
94
,14
9
91
,96
7
98
,24
4
99
,13
2
10
1,6
93
96
,60
2
10
1,9
46
92
,09
6
77
,12
5
74
,22
4
75
,45
4 93
,25
2
95
,55
3
97
,23
8
95
,36
5
94
,43
6
98
,84
7
87
,88
3
95
,47
2
83
,36
2
73
,94
9
61
,09
7
57
,73
1
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
NOISE ABATEMENT
JANUARY 2018
Runway 17 99.3%
Corridor 91.0%
RUS 57.1% Arrive – 71% Depart – 43%
FEBRUARY 2018
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
Cross Day 28.1%
Cross Night 37%
Runway 17 99.5%
Corridor 96.4%
RUS 55.3% Arrive – 63% Depart – 48%
Cross Day 30.4%
Cross Night 42.5%
Runway 17 99.3%
Corridor 91.0%
RUS 57.1% Arrive – 71% Depart – 43%
Cross Day 28.1%
Cross Night 37%
Runway 17 99.5%
Corridor 96.4%
RUS 55.3% Arrive – 63% Depart – 48%
Cross Day 30.4%
Cross Night 42.5%
80%
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
NOISE ABATEMENT
JANUARY 2018 FEBRUARY 2018
Runway 17 99.3%
Corridor 91.0%
RUS 57.1% Arrive – 71% Depart – 43%
Cross Day 28.1%
Cross Night 37%
Runway 17 99.5%
Corridor 96.4%
RUS 55.3% Arrive – 63% Depart – 48%
Cross Day 30.4%
Cross Night 42.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
DAY USAGE NIGHT USAGE
NOISE ABATEMENT
JANUARY 2018 FEBRUARY 2018
Runway 17 99.3%
Corridor 91.0%
RUS 57.1% Arrive – 71% Depart – 43%
Cross Day 28.1%
Cross Night 37%
Runway 17 99.5%
Corridor 96.4%
RUS 55.3% Arrive – 63% Depart – 48%
Cross Day 30.4%
Cross Night 42.5%
10
,66
9
9,4
13
9,5
54
7,3
62
12
,28
1
9,3
62
8,6
85
12
,53
6
10
,42
0
8,3
57
9,5
70
9,4
73
11
,09
7
8,7
12
8,4
88
10
,20
7
8,7
63
9,4
66
5,2
29
8,4
18
6,0
45 9
,00
5
9,0
72
9,9
87
7,6
76
5,8
88 8,1
87
9,0
30
9,6
40
9,3
84
6,8
41
7,2
57
8,9
39
11
,17
6
9,9
64
9,9
89
9,1
40
9,3
69
10
,98
2
10
,88
1
7,9
18 11
,11
6
7,5
64 9,7
13
9,2
00
11
,85
3
10
,89
6
9,4
17
19
,95
32
0,3
13
8,2
61
7,9
99
8,3
74
11
,43
2
6,8
07
9,5
35
8,5
19
5,6
79
5,4
91
8,5
64
7,3
17
5,8
19
7,3
89
7,8
56
8,8
96
8,0
14
10
,99
3
10
,73
1
11
,65
6
9,1
75
10
,39
7
8,5
42
7,2
89
5,7
51
10
,46
3
11
,06
9
10
,36
9
10
,38
5
10
,94
7
11
,25
6
11
,12
2
11
,09
0
9,1
85
7,0
81
6,9
57
6,2
21 9,2
16
8,2
79
7,8
60
8,3
26
11
,72
0
10
,20
4
10
,33
5
9,0
25
8,2
60
6,3
98
6,6
36
7,1
86
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
MA
R-1
4
MA
Y-1
4
JU
L-1
4
SE
P-1
4
NO
V-1
4
JA
N-1
5
MA
R-1
5
MA
Y-1
5
JU
L-1
5
SE
P-1
5
NO
V-1
5
JA
N-1
6
MA
R-1
6
MA
Y-1
6
JU
L-1
6
SE
P-1
6
NO
V-1
6
JA
N-1
7
MA
R-1
7
MA
Y-1
7
JU
L-1
7
SE
P-1
7
NO
V-1
7
JA
N-1
8
ARR DEP RUS
NOISE ABATEMENT
JANUARY 2018 FEBRUARY 2018
ITEM 3RESPONSE TO MSP FAIRSKIES REQUESTS
(CONTINUED FROM THE JANUARY 24 DISCUSSION)
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
Item 3: Response to MSP FairSkies Requests
September 20, 2017 NOC Meeting representatives from MSP FairSkies addressed the Committee requesting that NOC/MAC:
1. Enhance the NOC with greater stakeholder (citizen) representation
2. Establish a goal to reduce noise
3. Produce a 55 dB and N65 NEM/Contour
Item 3: Response to MSP FairSkies Requests
In response to the first two requests, on January 24, 2018 the NOC discussed the following:
1. Enhance the NOC with greater stakeholder (citizen) representation
• Concurred that the current balance of six user representatives and six community representatives was appropriate for the NOC membership
• Took action to establish a NOC Bylaw Subcommittee to review the bylaws and recommend changes to enhance citizen engagement during meetings
2. Establish a goal to reduce noise
• Took action to solidify the goal to mitigate homes out to the actual 60 dB DNL contour by the year 2024
• Agreed that the establishment of this goal does not preclude further discussion to establish Committee goals in the future
Item 3: NOC Action – FairSkies Request: NOC/MAC Publish 55 dB DNL and N65 Contours & NEMs
Request 3:
Does the Committee recommend publication of 55 dB DNL and N65 noise contours and NEMs?
Item 3: Background – FairSkies Request: NOC/MAC Publish 55 dB DNL and N65 Contours & NEMs
OBJECTIVES
Objective #1: Help advance a more restrictive noise metric/threshold in before FAA returns to MSP for RNAV SID implementation
Objective #2: Acknowledge and validate that residents who live beyond the 60 DNL noise contour experience aircraft overflights and noise
Item 3: Background – FairSkies Request: NOC/MAC Publish 55 dB DNL and N65 Contours & NEMs
EVALUATING TACTICS TO ACHIEVE OBJECTIVES
Are there relevant situational factors?
Are there unintended consequences/risks that should be considered?
Do the proposed tactics provide the most effective means to achieve the objectives?
Item 3: NOC Action – FairSkies Request: NOC/MAC Publish 55 dB DNL and N65 Contours & NEMs
Does the Committee recommend publication of 55 dB DNL and N65 noise contours and NEMs?
ITEM 4MSP NOISE MANAGEMENT BENCHMARKING STUDY SCOPE
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
MSP Noise Management Benchmarking Study Proposed Scope Presented to: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC)
Mary Ellen EaganMarch 21, 2018
Agenda
HMMH Overview
Mary Ellen Eagan bio
Proposed Approach
Anticipated Schedule
30
HMMH’s Aviation Services
NEPA
Noise
Air Quality
Outreach/NextGen Communications
Airport and Airspace Design
Sustainability/Renewable Energy
Software Tools
Training
Expert Noise Services
Environmental Assessments / Environmental Impact Statements
Part 150
Part 161
Noise Modeling
Noise Monitoring Systems
Sound Insulation
Airport Ground Noise
ResearchNoise Exposure Map, Newark Liberty International Airport, 2016
US Clients
International Clients
Mary Ellen Eagan
34 years airport noise consulting experience
ACI Noise Working Group Chair; ACI World Environment Standing Committee
TRB Aviation Group Chair
25 years support to Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise
Principal Investigator, ACRP Research Study on Effects of Aircraft Noise on Children’s Learning
35
Benchmarking Study Objectives
Understand the constraints imposed on U.S. airport noise programs due to the highly-regulated environment in contrast with airports in other countries
Provide an independent and transparent review of the MAC Noise Program Office and related noise abatement activities as compared with peer airports in the U.S.
Identify improvement opportunities for the MAC Noise Program Office and MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC).
36
Proposed Scope of Work
Identify noise program
components and activities to benchmark
Develop data gathering strategy
Data collection
Data analysis Draft report Final report
37
Task 1: Identify noise program activities to benchmark
HMMH will work with MAC Noise Program Office and NOC to develop list of activities to benchmark, including:• Operational Measures
• Mitigation and Land Use Measures
• Program Management and Innovate use of Technology
• Stakeholder Engagement
• Research and policy
38
Task 2: Develop survey
HMMH will develop an online survey (e.g., SurveyMonkey)
Survey respondent list will be developed from ACI-NA and AAAE mailing lists
HMMH will review draft and final survey recipient list with MAC staff
39
Task 3: Data collection
Survey link will be sent from MSP to survey recipients
After two weeks, HMMH will send recipients a reminder
After another week, HMMH will call recipients and offer to assist with completion
HMMH will research and document current laws/rules/regulations/policies in the U.S. related to noise and mitigation
40
Task 4: Data/Policy analysis
HMMH will summarize the data collected through online and telephone survey
HMMH will summarize implications of U.S. laws/rules/regulations/policies
41
Task 5: Draft report
HMMH will prepare a draft report; proposed sections include:• Background (i.e., motivation for the benchmarking study)
• Study methodology
• Findings
• Recommendations
HMMH will review this report with NOC
42
Task 6: Final report
HMMH will finalize report based on input received from NOC
HMMH will prepare and present the study results to the MSP Noise Oversight Committee
43
Anticipated Schedule
44
Task 1: Identify components to benchmark
Task 2: Develop data gathering strategy
Task 3: Data collection
Task 4: Data analysis
Task 5: Draft report
Task 6: Final report
Milestone Dates:
Draft Report to MAC: June 29
Draft Report to NOC: July 11
Prentation of draft findings to NOC: July 18
Final Report to MAC: Aug 31
Final Report to NOC: Sep 12
Prentation of final report to NOC: Sep 19
August SeptemberJune JulyMar April May
Discussion
45
Item 4: NOC Action – MSP Noise Management Benchmarking Study Scope
REQUESTED ACTION
APPROVE THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK BY HMMH FOR THE MSP NOISE MANAGEMENT BENCHMARKING STUDY.
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
ITEM 52017 ANNUAL NOISE CONTOUR REPORT AND MITIGATION
ELIGIBILITY
Report Overview
• The amended Consent Decree requires the MAC to prepare an annual noise contour analysis for MSP by March 1 of each year.
• On February 28, 2018, the MAC published the 11th Annual Noise Contour Report consistent with the requirements in the Consent Decree.
• The 2017 actual noise contour was developed in partnership with HNTB using the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT).
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
2017 vs 2007 Statistics• 2017 total operations - 415,703*
A 28.6% reduction from 2007 forecast operations
• During 2017, one Hushkit Stage 3 jet operated every 10 days on average The 2007 forecast average is 274.9 Hushkit
flights per day
• Nighttime operations in 2017 decreased by 3.2 average daily operations from the 2007 forecast number
• The 2017 actual noise contour is smaller than the 2007 forecast contour by 27% in the 60 DNL contour and 38% in the 65 DNL contour
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
*Based on airport operations counts documented by the FAA for MSP in 2017.
Two areas of the 2017 contour have extended beyond the 2007 forecast contour
• 2017 had more balance between North Flow and South Flow operations compared to the previous 2 years due to the FAA’s efforts to refine traffic management during Converging Runway Operations
• Reduction of noise exposure in 2017 compared to 2016 under the arrival lobes of Runways 12L and 12R (dark blue)
• Increased noise exposure in 2017 under the arrival and departure lobes of Runways 30L and 30R (light blue)
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
Overview of Mitigation Eligibility per the Amended Consent Decree
The current program will provide mitigation to eligible homes until 2024 based on actual noise exposure 5 dB DNL further into the community than the federal threshold of 65 dB DNL
The home must meet the following 2 criteria:
(a) The community in which the home is located has adopted local land use controls and building performance standards to ensure the practices are consistent with the noise mitigation provided by the MAC.
(b) The home is located for 3 consecutive years in the actual 60 DNL noise contour and within a higher mitigation area when compared to the original program.
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
Overview of Mitigation Eligibility per the Amended Consent Decree
The MAC will provide 2 different packages depending on exposure area:
• Eligible homes within the 63 dB DNL contour receive the Full 5dB Reduction Package, designed to reduce interior noise levels by an average of 5 decibels
• Eligible homes within the 60 db DNL contour receive the Partial Noise Reduction Package, which comes with two options:
Central air conditioning + $5,503* of mitigation products and services; or
$19,262* of noise mitigation products and services
The MAC will provide mitigation to homes the year following eligibility determination.
The only residential properties that currently meet the mitigation eligibility criteria are located in the City of Minneapolis.
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
*Any reimbursement or mitigation improvements previously provided by the MAC will be deducted from the dollar amounts; dollar amounts will be adjusted according to the project year CPI.
Blocks completed under the original Part 150 program and 2007 Consent Decree
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
Blocks completed under previous programs
Blocks eligible for 2017-2018 Partial Noise Reduction Package
Outside any previous areas of mitigation
Blocks eligible for 2017-2018 Partial Noise Reduction Package
Eligible for reimbursements under the previous mitigation program
Blocks eligible for 2018 Full 5 dB Reduction Package
Eligible for Partial Noise Reduction under the previous mitigation program
2017 and 2018 Mitigation Programs
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
By the Numbers:145 Single-Family Homes158 Single-Family Homes and 88 Multi-Family Units118 Single-Family Homes
Blocks completed under previous programs
Blocks eligible for 2019 Full 5dB Reduction Package
Previously eligible for Partial Noise Reduction Package
Blocks eligible for 2019 Partial Noise Reduction Package
Eligible for reimbursements under the previous mitigation program
2019 Mitigation Program:Determined Eligible this Year
Blocks eligible for 2019 Partial Noise Reduction Package
Outside any previous areas of mitigation
Blocks completed as part of the 2017-2018 programs
By the Numbers:177 Single-Family Homes72 Single-Family Homes181 Single-Family Homes
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
Blocks completed under previous programs
Candidate Blocks for Full 5dB Reduction Package
Previously eligible for Partial Noise Reduction Package
Candidate Blocks for Partial Noise Reduction Package
Eligible for reimbursements under the previous mitigation program
A Look beyond 2019
Candidate Blocks for Partial Noise Reduction Package
Outside any areas of previous mitigation
Blocks completed in the 2017, 2018 and 2019 programs
1
2
Achieved Year 1 of Candidate Eligibility this Year(If these blocks remain in a higher impact area for 2 more years, they will be eligible for mitigation in 2021.)
Achieved Year 2 of Candidate Eligibility this Year(If these blocks remain in a higher impact area in the 2018 Actual Noise Contour, they will be eligible for mitigation in 2020.)
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
Blocks completed under previous programs
Candidate Blocks for Full 5dB Reduction Package
Previously eligible for Partial Noise Reduction Package
Candidate Blocks for Partial Noise Reduction Package
Eligible for reimbursements under the previous mitigation program
A Look beyond 2019
Candidate Blocks for Partial Noise Reduction Package
Outside any areas of previous mitigation
Blocks completed in the 2017, 2018 and 2019 programs
1
2
Achieved Year 1 of Candidate Eligibility this Year(If these blocks remain in a higher impact area for 2 more years, they will be eligible for mitigation in 2021.)
Achieved Year 2 of Candidate Eligibility this Year(If these blocks remain in a higher impact area in the 2018 Actual Noise Contour, they will be eligible for mitigation in 2020.)
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
The MAC will contact eligible homeowners. A this time, there is nothing for the homeowners to do to initiate the 2019 mitigation process.
Materials regarding the Residential Noise Mitigation Program are available at http://www.macnoise.com/noise-mitigation-program
Item 5: 2017 Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation Activity
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
ITEM 6VORTEX GENERATOR NOISE MONITORING STUDY
Study Results
Noise monitoring began on August 30, 2017 concluded on October 12, 2017
• 9,181 total noise events recorded
• 4,033 correlated to MSP aircraft operations (3,527 arrivals and 506 departures)
• 453 correlated to Airbus A320 family arrivals (excluding United Airlines)
• 29 were determined to be equipped with vortex generators and 424 were non-equipped
Item 6: Vortex Generator Noise Monitoring Study
Study Results
The vortex generator data had Lmax noise level differences from -0.4 to +1.6 dBA, SEL noise level differences from -1.0 to +1.2 dBA and average duration from -1 to +5 seconds.
When taking aircraft noise measurements from the ground during this phase of flight, staff found the measured aircraft noise events struggled to exceed the ambient noise level in the community. Therefore, quantifying the noise reduction benefits provided by these devices from the ground becomes extremely difficult.
The study limitations included the low threshold settings required to collect aircraft arrival events between 5,000 and 9,000 feet in altitude, which resulted in noise level data that was impacted by louder community events; and the small sample of vortex generator-equipped aircraft operations that were available to analyze.
Item 6: Vortex Generator Noise Monitoring Study
ITEM 7SUPER BOWL ACTIVITY DEBRIEF
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
Item 7: Super Bowl Activity Debrief
0
2 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
8 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
1 , 2 0 0
1 , 4 0 0
1 , 6 0 0
T U E W E D T H U FR I S A T SU N M O N
CHART 1 - MSP OPERATIONS BY DAYSU P E R B O W L AV E R AG E
22
1 25
3
19
5
28
4
22
1 26
4
26
9
27
7
27
8
26
5 32
1
31
2
30
7
26
1 31
7
27
5 32
3 38
5
31
6
23
4
0
5 0
1 0 0
1 5 0
2 0 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
3 5 0
4 0 0
4 5 0
2/
2/
14
2/
9/
14
2/
16
/1
4
2/
23
/1
4
2/
1/
15
2/
8/
15
2/
15
/1
5
2/
22
/1
5
1/
31
/1
6
2/
7/
16
2/
14
/1
6
2/
21
/1
6
2/
28
/1
6
2/
5/
17
2/
12
/1
7
2/
19
/1
7
2/
26
/1
7
2/
4/
18
2/
11
/1
8
2/
18
/1
8
CHART 4 - MSP OPERATIONS8:00 PM SUNDAY - 8:00 AM MONDAY
AR R D E P
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
1 2 0
0:0
0
2:0
0
4:0
0
6:0
0
8:0
0
10
:00
12
:00
14
:00
16
:00
18
:00
20
:00
22
:00
0:0
0
2:0
0
4:0
0
6:0
0
8:0
0
10
:00
12
:00
14
:00
16
:00
18
:00
20
:00
22
:00
SU N M O N
CHART 5 - MSP OPERATIONS
AV E R AG E SU P E R B O W L
Item 7: Super Bowl Activity Debrief
20 26
83154
0
5 0
1 0 0
1 5 0
2 0 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
3 5 0
4 0 0
4 5 0
2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7
J AN FE B
CHART 6 - MSP COMPLAINTS BY DAY
L O C AT I O NS C O M P L AI NT S
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
T U E W E D T H U FR I S A T SU N M O N
CHART 7 - MSP COMPLAINTS BY DAY
L O C AT I O NS F I L I NG C O M P L AI NT S D U R I NG SU P E R B O W L W E E K
AV E R AG E L O C AT I O NS
C O M P L AI NT S D U R I NG SU P E R B O W L W E E K
AV E R AG E C O M P L AI NT S
Item 7: Super Bowl Activity Debrief
ITEM 8REVIEW OF THE WINTER LISTENING SESSION
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
Item 8: Review of the Winter Listening Session
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEEMARCH 21, 2018
40 residents attended the Winter Listening Session at Mount Olivet Lutheran Church in the Lynnhurst neighborhood of Minneapolis.
The majority of the attendees were from Minneapolis and Edina.
The meeting was also attended by representatives from FAA air traffic, MAC Commission, Minneapolis and Bloomington City Councils, NOC, Minneapolis Staff, and Metropolitan Council.
MAC staff opened with an introduction and presentation. Slides are available at:
The open floor conversation focused on:• MSP nighttime operations• Frequency of arrivals to Runways 12L and 12R• Balancing arrivals to Runways 12L and 12R with
departures from Runways 30L and 30R• Noise monitoring locations and data• Creation of DNL noise contours and eligibility criteria
for the Residential Noise Mitigation Program• Area Navigation (RNAV) procedures at MSP• Departures flying runway heading straight-out over
Minneapolis• The DNL noise metric and its representation of actual
noise impacts• Alternative noise metrics • Anticipated air traffic demand in the future• MSP Fairskies requests to the NOC
ITEM 9PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
ITEM 10ANNOUNCEMENTS
NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
MARCH 21, 2018
Spring Listening Session
Wednesday, April 25, 2018 @ 7:00 PM
MAC General Offices
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55450
Next NOC Meeting
Wednesday, May 16, 2018 @ 1:30 PM
MAC General Offices
