Upload
mariah-gibbs
View
321
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Non-HDL Cholesterol and Apo B:To B or Not to B?
非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇与载脂蛋白 B:选用载脂蛋白 B吗?
Dr Richard Pang
3 November (Thursday) 2005
Symposium on Laboratory Medicine
To (measure apo) BTo (measure apo) B
Or NOTOr NOT
To (measure apo) BTo (measure apo) B
Financial ConstraintsFinancial Constraints
LFT – ALTLFT – ALT RFT – CreatinineRFT – Creatinine TFT – TSHTFT – TSH Lipids (ASCVD) - ?Lipids (ASCVD) - ?
Heart Disease & StrokeHeart Disease & Stroke
Atherosclerosis
Artery Wall Lipid Metabolism Risk Factors Genetics
Pathology LDL/VLDL Hypertension Population
Cytokines HDL Coagulation Epidemiology
Oxidation Bile Diabetes Genetic Markers
Hemodynamics Cholesterol Obesity Candidate Genes
Virus Triglycerides Immune Factors Animal Models
Lp(a) Homocystinuria Environment
A.J. Lusis, J.I. Rotter, R.S. Sparkes Karger, 1992, ISBN 3-8055-5558-XMonography in Human Genetics: Vol. 14, Molecular Genetics of Coronary Artery Disease.
Heart Attack!Heart Attack!
The commonest form of heart disease, CHD killed 3719 people in 2003 and
accounted for 10.2% of the registered deaths…
Source: Mortality statistics, 2003 (provisional data). Department of Health, Census and Statistics Department. The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
DyslipoproteinaemiaDyslipoproteinaemia
Assessment of lipidrelated ASCVD risk in practice originally focused
on total cholesterol. In fact, it is thelipoprotein and apolipoprotein particles that exert
the beneficial or adverse effects.Measurement of the cholesterol carried within the
particles particularly LDL and HDLserves as the commonly used default estimate of
their concentrations
Courtesy of National Library of Medicine
The LipoproteinsThe Lipoproteins
VLDLVLDL == Very-low-density lipoproteinVery-low-density lipoproteinIDLIDL == Intermediate-density lipoproteinIntermediate-density lipoproteinLDLLDL == Low-density lipoproteinLow-density lipoproteinHDLHDL == High-density lipoproteinHigh-density lipoprotein
DensityDensity Particle DiameterParticle Diameter Flotation RateFlotation Rate ElectrophoretiElectrophoreticcLipoproteinLipoprotein (kg/L)(kg/L) (nm)(nm) (Sf)(Sf) MobilityMobility
ChylomicronsChylomicrons < 0.95< 0.95 80 - 120080 - 1200 > 400> 400 OriginOrigin
VLDLVLDL 0.95 – 1.0060.95 – 1.006 30 – 8030 – 80 60 – 40060 – 400 Pre-betaPre-beta
IDLIDL 1.006 – 1.0191.006 – 1.019 23 – 3523 – 35 20 – 6020 – 60 Broad betaBroad beta
LDLLDL 1.019 – 1.0631.019 – 1.063 18 – 2518 – 25 0 – 200 – 20 BetaBeta
HDLHDL 1.063 – 1.211.063 – 1.21 5 – 125 – 12 0 – 90 – 9 AlphaAlpha
Chylomicrons
LDL
VLDL
HDL
Free Fatty Acids
The ApolipoproteinsThe Apolipoproteins
HDLHDL == High-density lipoproteinHigh-density lipoprotein LCATLCAT == Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferaseLecithin:cholesterol acyltransferaseLPLLPL == Lipoprotein lipaseLipoprotein lipase HTGLHTGL == Hepatic triglyceride lipaseHepatic triglyceride lipaseVLDLVLDL == Very-low-density lipoproteinVery-low-density lipoprotein LDLLDL == Low-density lipoproteinLow-density lipoproteinIDLIDL == Intermediate-density lipoproteinIntermediate-density lipoprotein LRPLRP == LDL receptor-related proteinLDL receptor-related protein
Association withAssociation withApolipoprotein Apolipoprotein Main Functions Main Functions CHD RiskCHD Risk
Apo A-IApo A-I Structural for HDL. Ligand for HDL binding. LCAT cofactor.Structural for HDL. Ligand for HDL binding. LCAT cofactor. YesYes
Apo A-IIApo A-II Structural for HDL. Ligand for HDL binding. LCAT cofactor.Structural for HDL. Ligand for HDL binding. LCAT cofactor. NoNo
Modulator of LPL and HTGL activity (?)Modulator of LPL and HTGL activity (?)
Apo A-IVApo A-IV Ligand for HDL binding. LCAT activator.Ligand for HDL binding. LCAT activator. NoNo
Apo A-VApo A-V Intracellular VLDL assembly. Down regulation of LPL (?)Intracellular VLDL assembly. Down regulation of LPL (?) ??
Apo (a)Apo (a) Structural for Lp(a). Structural analogy with plasminogen.Structural for Lp(a). Structural analogy with plasminogen. YesYes
Apo B-48Apo B-48 Structural for chylomicrons.Structural for chylomicrons. NoNo
Apo B-100Apo B-100 Structural for VLDL, IDL and LDL. LDL receptor ligand.Structural for VLDL, IDL and LDL. LDL receptor ligand. YesYes
Apo C-IApo C-I LCAT and LPL activator.LCAT and LPL activator. NoNo
Apo C-IIApo C-II LCAT and LPL activator.LCAT and LPL activator. NoNo
Apo C-IIIApo C-III LPL inhibitor. Modulator of uptake of triglyceride-richLPL inhibitor. Modulator of uptake of triglyceride-rich NoNo
lipoproteins by LRP.lipoproteins by LRP.
Apo DApo D Unknown.Unknown. NoNo
Apo EApo E Ligand for B/E receptors, LRP and apo E2 receptor.Ligand for B/E receptors, LRP and apo E2 receptor. Phenotype, yesPhenotype, yes
Apo FApo F Unknown.Unknown. NoNo
Apo HApo H Unknown.Unknown. NoNo
Apo JApo J Membrane protection(?)Membrane protection(?) NoNo
Apo MApo M Structural for HDL. Transfer of cholesterol.Structural for HDL. Transfer of cholesterol. ??
Apolipoproteins Phospholipid Cholesterol
Triglycerides Cholesterol Esters
Lipoprotein Structure
Apo B-containing Lipoproteins
Segrest et al. Structure of apoB and LDL. J Lipid Res 2001 42:1346–1367.
Apo B, which has a Mr of 550 kD, is the major protein found in LDL and is responsible for the cellular uptake of LDL particles from the plasma (Goldstein & Brown 1982).
Apo B-containing Apo B-containing LipoproteinsLipoproteins
LDLLDL Triglyceride-rich lipoproteinsTriglyceride-rich lipoproteins
VLDLVLDL IDLIDL
Lp(a)Lp(a)
N C E P
G U I D E L I N E S
LIPID
HYPOTHESIS
ANIMAL DATADATA
DEC
REA
SED
OVE
RA
LL
MO
RTA
LITY
1 O
PREVENTION
STUDIES
2O
PREV
ENTI
ON
STUD
IES
REGRESSION
STUDIES
The Full Report of NCEPThe Full Report of NCEP ATP-III ATP-III
http://www.nhlbi.nih.govhttp://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
Executive Summary of The Third Report of The Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults
(Adult Treatment Panel III)(Adult Treatment Panel III)JAMA May 16 2001, 285(19) p2486-97JAMA May 16 2001, 285(19) p2486-97
Should the goal of lipid Should the goal of lipid therapy be based on LDL-C, therapy be based on LDL-C, apo B-100 or non-HDL-C?apo B-100 or non-HDL-C?
Sueta et al. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 1303-1307
Source: http://www.lipidsonline.org/
LDL-C as primary target of therapy
Limitations of LDL-C in general LDL particles can be heterogeneous in size, the LDL particle number may be a better indicator of t
he atherogenic potential of the LDL fraction than is LDL–C concentration.
Limitations of LDL –C in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia
Friedewald FormulaFriedewald Formula(Calculated LDL-C)(Calculated LDL-C)
LDL-C = TC –(TG/2.2 + HDL-C)LDL-C = TC –(TG/2.2 + HDL-C)
Estimated value of VLDL-C from TG
BUT does not apply to
chylomicrons (non-fasting)
Friedewald FormulaFriedewald Formula(Calculated LDL-C)(Calculated LDL-C)
Based on two assumptionsBased on two assumptionsFastingFastingTriglyceride <4.5 mmol/LTriglyceride <4.5 mmol/L
IMPORTANT
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Triglycerides level (mmol/L)
diffe
renc
e of
LDL
betw
een
calc
ulat
ion
and
mea
sure
men
t(m
mol
/L)
Chylomicrons LDL VLDL
HDL
TC = 31.5
TG = 4.3
HDL-C = 0.52
LDL-C = 29.0 (by calculation)
LDL-C = 5.0 (by direct method)
Apo A1 = <0.25
Apo B = 2.77
99CA074094
Cholestasis & Jaundice
Lp-X?
Free fatty acids
In many cases of fasting In many cases of fasting hypertriglyceridaemia common in hypertriglyceridaemia common in
diabetesdiabetes The clinician has no reliable estimate (usuThe clinician has no reliable estimate (usu
ally an ally an underestimateunderestimate) of the LDL choleste) of the LDL cholesterol by calculationrol by calculation
No objective index of lipid-associated CHD No objective index of lipid-associated CHD risk unless the LDL cholesterol is available risk unless the LDL cholesterol is available (by labour intensive ultracentrifugation)(by labour intensive ultracentrifugation)
Significant bias (usually an Significant bias (usually an overestimateoverestimate) i) in the direct methodn the direct method
Chylomicrons
LDL
VLDL
HDL
Free Fatty Acids
TC = 5.9
TG = 14.3
LDL-C = 2.2 (by direct method)
HDL-C = 0.71
Apo A1 = 0.93 HbA1 = 11.2
Apo B = 1.10 Glucose = 14.2
01C9214160
Poor glycaemic control
To (measure apo) BTo (measure apo) B
Or NOTOr NOT
To (measure apo) B?To (measure apo) B?
All that remains is for its All that remains is for its reliabilityreliability as a predictor as a predictor of CHD risk that may be of CHD risk that may be
superior to LDL-C?superior to LDL-C?
Relative riskRelative risk Much emphasis was placed on estimates of reMuch emphasis was placed on estimates of re
lative risk for CHD accompanying different lipolative risk for CHD accompanying different lipoprotein fractionsprotein fractions
Lipidologists have championed one fraction or Lipidologists have championed one fraction or another as the best predictor of CHDanother as the best predictor of CHD LDL cholesterolLDL cholesterol HDL cholesterolHDL cholesterol Total cholesterol/HDL cholesterolTotal cholesterol/HDL cholesterol Small LDL particlesSmall LDL particles Remnant lipoproteinsRemnant lipoproteins Total apolipoprotein BTotal apolipoprotein B Lipoprotein(a)Lipoprotein(a) Non-HDL cholesterolNon-HDL cholesterol
Predictive Power of Predictive Power of LipoproteinsLipoproteins
Total Cholesterol: Strong independent Total Cholesterol: Strong independent relationrelation
LDL Cholesterol: widely accepted as LDL Cholesterol: widely accepted as independent risk factorindependent risk factor
Reduced levels of HDL cholesterol: Reduced levels of HDL cholesterol: independently predict CHD incidenceindependently predict CHD incidence
High triglyceride levels carry independent High triglyceride levels carry independent predictive power has been less robustpredictive power has been less robust
Total apo BTotal apo B
Signifies atherogenic potential and a Signifies atherogenic potential and a strong predictor of CHD riskstrong predictor of CHD risk
Sniderman AD. Counterpoint: To (measure apo) B or not to (measure apo) B: a critique of modern medical decision-making. Clin Chem 1997; 43: 1310-1314
Apo B as a better treatment index than LDL-C
?In general, statins produce closely similar percent
reductions in concentrations of LDL-C andapo B, and therefore the reasons whyapo B is a better index than LDL-C to
assess adequacy of statin therapy may not be immediatelyobvious. However, in patients with small dense LDL, by
definition, LDL particle number will be higher than LDL-C. Thus, on-treatment LDL-C
concentration will give an inaccurate impression of theextent to which atherogenic particle number has been
reduced, and treatment guided by this value could result inundertreatment.
Sniderman et al. Apolipoproteins versus lipids as indices of coronary risk and as targets for statin treatment. Lancet 2003; 361: 777–80
Practical IssuePractical Issue
What if the laboratory does not What if the laboratory does not measure apo B?measure apo B?
Current MethodologiesCurrent Methodologies
Rate immunonephlometric assays (INA)Rate immunonephlometric assays (INA) Immunoturbidometric assays (ITA)Immunoturbidometric assays (ITA) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)
International Reference Material SP3-07
Relatively expensive
Non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in the dysliNon-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in the dyslipidemic classification of type 2 diabetic patients - Epipidemic classification of type 2 diabetic patients - Epidemiology/Health Services/Psychosocial Research - hdemiology/Health Services/Psychosocial Research - h
igh density lipoproteinigh density lipoprotein
CONCLUSIONS: Non-HDL cholesterol and apoB CONCLUSIONS: Non-HDL cholesterol and apoB are equivalent risk markers in hypertriglyceridemiare equivalent risk markers in hypertriglyceridemic patients, but apoB identifies additional patients c patients, but apoB identifies additional patients with high-risk dyslipidemic phenotypes in normotwith high-risk dyslipidemic phenotypes in normot
riglyceridemic type 2 diabetic patients…riglyceridemic type 2 diabetic patients…
Wagner et al. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 2048-51.
To (measure apo) BTo (measure apo) B
Or NOTOr NOT
To (measure apo) B?To (measure apo) B?
Apo B vs Non-HDL cholesterolApo B vs Non-HDL cholesterol
Apo B vs Non-HDL Apo B vs Non-HDL cholesterolcholesterol
Because there is one apo B molecule per Because there is one apo B molecule per lipoprotein particlelipoprotein particle
Total apo B concentrations are a measure of Total apo B concentrations are a measure of total particle number of the “atherogenic” total particle number of the “atherogenic” lipoproteinslipoproteins
HDL is a “good” cholesterol. Non-HDL HDL is a “good” cholesterol. Non-HDL cholesterol provides the cholesterol content of cholesterol provides the cholesterol content of all the atherogenic lipoproteinsall the atherogenic lipoproteins
Total apo B was acknowledged (NCEP ATP III) Total apo B was acknowledged (NCEP ATP III) as an alternative to non-HDL cholesterol but as an alternative to non-HDL cholesterol but non-HDL cholesterol was highlighted because of non-HDL cholesterol was highlighted because of wide availability and reliability of estimationwide availability and reliability of estimation
Non-HDL Cholesterol: A Logical Extension Non-HDL Cholesterol: A Logical Extension of the Priority Given to LDL Cholesterol?of the Priority Given to LDL Cholesterol?
Pang et al. Plasma lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels in a random population sample of 2875 Hong Kong Chinese adults and their implications (NCEP ATP-III, 2001 guidelines) on cardiovascular risk assessment. Atherosclerosis 2005 (in press).
Overall 39% Men
29% Women
Non-HDL Cholesterol into the Non-HDL Cholesterol into the SpotlightSpotlight
Just a simple calculationJust a simple calculation Easily available with every lipid profileEasily available with every lipid profile Eliminating any additional costsEliminating any additional costs Circumvents the measurement of triglyceriCircumvents the measurement of triglyceri
desdes Patient does not require in the fasting statPatient does not require in the fasting stat
e e (?(?!!)) Avoids the potential inaccuracy of calculatAvoids the potential inaccuracy of calculat
ed LDL cholesteroled LDL cholesterol
Medline SearchMedline SearchYearYear Non-HDLNon-HDL TitleTitle
19971997 88 00
19981998 88 22
19991999 66 11
20002000 1010 11
2001 2001 NCEP ATP-IIINCEP ATP-III 1414 33
20022002 1818 55
20032003 2929 1212
20042004
2005 2005 (~October(~October))
3939
3030
1515
1111
The advantages of using The advantages of using Non-HDL cholesterol in Non-HDL cholesterol in
the diagnosis and the diagnosis and treatment of treatment of
dyslipidaemia?dyslipidaemia?
??Type 2 Diabetes????Type 2 Diabetes??(Metabolic Syndrome)(Metabolic Syndrome)
Jiang et al. Non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B predict cardiovascular disease events among men with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2004 Aug;27(8):1991-7.
Non-high-density lipoprotein Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: why lower is better?cholesterol: why lower is better?
Recent comparative trials of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A Recent comparative trials of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) suggest that lower is better and that redreductase inhibitors (statins) suggest that lower is better and that reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to below 100 ucing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to below 100 mg/dL can provide additional clinical benefit. Non-high-density lipoprmg/dL can provide additional clinical benefit. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) contains more atherogenic cholesterol otein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) contains more atherogenic cholesterol than LDL-C and is considered a more accurate measurement of the than LDL-C and is considered a more accurate measurement of the total amount of atherogenic particles in the circulation. Therefore, the total amount of atherogenic particles in the circulation. Therefore, the principle that "lower is better" may also apply to lowering levels of noprinciple that "lower is better" may also apply to lowering levels of non-HDL-C. In persons with high triglycerides (200-499 mg/dL), LDL-C n-HDL-C. In persons with high triglycerides (200-499 mg/dL), LDL-C remains the primary target of therapy, but non-HDL-C is an important remains the primary target of therapy, but non-HDL-C is an important secondary therapeutic target. Non-HDL-C is strongly correlated with secondary therapeutic target. Non-HDL-C is strongly correlated with small dense LDL as well as apolipoprotein B, an established predictosmall dense LDL as well as apolipoprotein B, an established predictor of cardiovascular disease risk. Current evidence indicates that statir of cardiovascular disease risk. Current evidence indicates that statins not only rapidly and dramatically reduce LDL-C, but also have a sins not only rapidly and dramatically reduce LDL-C, but also have a similar effect on non-HDL-C, and that the greater the reduction in LDL-milar effect on non-HDL-C, and that the greater the reduction in LDL-
C, the greater will be the reduction in non-HDL-C.C, the greater will be the reduction in non-HDL-C.
Garg R; Vasamreddy CR; Blumenthal RS. Prev Cardiol 2005 8(3):173-7.
ArgumentsArguments (in favour) (in favour) Both non-HDL cholesterol and apo B are markerBoth non-HDL cholesterol and apo B are marker
s for all of the potentially atherogenic lipoproteins for all of the potentially atherogenic lipoproteins ie, LDL, IDL, Lp(a) and atherogenic VLDL (incls ie, LDL, IDL, Lp(a) and atherogenic VLDL (including remnant-like particles)uding remnant-like particles)
Among these, LDL, IDL and Lp(a) are widely accAmong these, LDL, IDL and Lp(a) are widely accepted as being atherogenicepted as being atherogenic
Evidence is growing that most of the apo B-contEvidence is growing that most of the apo B-containing lipoproteins in VLDL contribute to atherosaining lipoproteins in VLDL contribute to atherosclerosisclerosis
Use of non-HDL cholesterol adds an element of Use of non-HDL cholesterol adds an element of simplicity to guidelines by combining all atherogsimplicity to guidelines by combining all atherogenic lipoproteins into a single “fraction”enic lipoproteins into a single “fraction”
JAMA, July 20, 2005 Vol 294, No. 3 (Reprinted) ©2005 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Non–HDL Cholesterol, Apolipoproteins A-Iand B100, Standard Lipid Measures,Lipid Ratios, and CRP as Risk Factorsfor Cardiovascular Disease in Women
ArgumentsArguments (Not in favour) (Not in favour) Earlier ATP reports, making use of both Earlier ATP reports, making use of both
epidemiological data and clinical trial results, epidemiological data and clinical trial results, designated LDL cholesterol as the primary targetdesignated LDL cholesterol as the primary target
This designation has been widely accepted by This designation has been widely accepted by medical communitymedical community
Such that LDL is recognized by most physicians Such that LDL is recognized by most physicians as first target of treatmentas first target of treatment
Modification(s) without stronger evidence would Modification(s) without stronger evidence would introduce considerable “confusion” into the introduce considerable “confusion” into the general practice i.e., the pharmaceutical general practice i.e., the pharmaceutical company company “Market”“Market” interventions interventions
Take Home MessageTake Home Message
The LDL-C test is still The LDL-C test is still valuable, But the Apo B test valuable, But the Apo B test adds valuable information. adds valuable information.
One should also bear in One should also bear in mind that…mind that…
The use of apo B or non-HDL cholesterol will not The use of apo B or non-HDL cholesterol will not completely eliminate the need for a fasting triglycompletely eliminate the need for a fasting triglyceride levelceride level
When an elevated apo B-containing lipoproteins When an elevated apo B-containing lipoproteins or non-HDL cholesterol warrants drug treatment, or non-HDL cholesterol warrants drug treatment, the clinician must determine whether to use as fithe clinician must determine whether to use as first-line therapy an agent that targets LDL cholesrst-line therapy an agent that targets LDL cholesterol (e.g., Statins) or one that targets VLDL cholterol (e.g., Statins) or one that targets VLDL cholesterol (e.g., Fibrates)esterol (e.g., Fibrates)
In such cases, a measure of fasting triglycerides In such cases, a measure of fasting triglycerides and calculation (or a direct measurement) of LDand calculation (or a direct measurement) of LDL cholesterol will still be neededL cholesterol will still be needed
Allan D. Sniderman. Applying apoB to the diagnosis and therapy of the atherogenic dyslipoprot
einemias: a clinical diagnostic algorithm. Curr Opin Lipidol 15:433–438; 2004.
I’m good
ProgressionProgression
RegressioRegressionn
?
?
??
?
?HDL
LDL
VLDL
IDL
RLP
Lp(a)
If treatable, we’re not that bad!
To (measure apo) BTo (measure apo) B
Or NOTOr NOT
To (measure apo) B?To (measure apo) B?
Thank you for your attention