Upload
wylie
View
20
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Nonlinear Spectroscopy of Cold Atoms, Preparations for the BEC Experiments. Jerzy Zachorowski M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University. Tomasz Brzozowski Maria Mączyńska Jerzy Zachorowski Michał Zawada Wojciech Gawlik . IF UJ. The Group. I. I. Magneto-Optical Trap. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Jerzy ZachorowskiM. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics,
Jagiellonian University
Nonlinear Spectroscopy of Cold Atoms, Nonlinear Spectroscopy of Cold Atoms, Preparations for the BECPreparations for the BEC
ExperimentsExperiments
The GroupThe Group
Tomasz BrzozowskiMaria MączyńskaJerzy ZachorowskiMichał ZawadaWojciech Gawlik IF UJ
Magneto-Optical TrapMagneto-Optical Trap I
I
85RbN 108
T 100 K
Spectroscopy of Cold AtomsSpectroscopy of Cold Atoms
-40 -20 0 20
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
I = 22.4 · I 0
Detuning from the 3 - 4 resonance [MHz]
trap - probe [MHz]-2 -1 0 1 2 -2 -1 0 21
Laser systemLaser system
Master laser
Laseramplifier
Probelaser
Rb
Trap beamLaser
monitoring
Probe beam
PD
Frequency stabilization
AOM
AOMAOM
AOM
OIOI OI
Central StructureCentral Structure
• Raman transitions between light-shifted Zeeman sublevels
• Raman transitions between vibrational levels in the optical lattice
Zeeman sublevelsZeeman sublevels
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
1-2
0-10-1
a
b
c
d
p L - [MHz]
abso
rptio
n si
gnal
[arb
. uni
ts]
23,
13,03,
0-1
1-2
-13,
-23,
Vibrational levelsVibrational levels•Electric field in the trap: 6 beams of different polarizations.
•Relative phases not fixed, but relatively stable.
•Interference: intensity and/or polarization modulation.
•Additional optical forces (dipole forces).
•Atoms cooled and localized in the lattice nodes.
•Atomic movement quantized: vibrational energy levels.
RemarksRemarks
New experiments: trap modulation
Difference absorption-wave mixing
p L - [MHz]
abso
rptio
n si
gnal
[arb
. uni
ts]
FWM
sig
nal [
arb.
uni
ts]
-2 -1 0 1 2 3
Ultra-narrow central resonance
-2 -2-1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2
abso
rptio
n [a
.u.]
four
-wav
e m
ixin
g [a
.u.]
probe-pump beam detuning [MHz]
Bose-Einstein Bose-Einstein CondensationCondensation
de Broglie wavelength:TmkB
dB
22
density n, distance n1/3,
condensation when: )(3/1 Tn dB
Ketterle, PRL 77,416 (1996)
Lower temperaturesLower temperatures• Spontaneous emission: temperatures limited to 10 – 1K
• „Dark traps”: optical dipole or magnetic forces
• Cooling by evaporation
100 nK100 K300 K
MOT MT
Three steps to BECThree steps to BEC1. Magneto-Optical Trap:Magneto-Optical Trap:
temperature 10 mK, density 1010 cm-3
limit – interaction with light.
2. Magnetic Trap:Magnetic Trap:trap in field minimum - only „low-field-seeking” stateslosses at B = 0.
3. Evaporation cooling:Evaporation cooling:forced evaporation of hot atoms, thermalisation by collisions.
400 nK
200 nK
50 nK
1995 - E. Cornell & C. Wieman Rb87
Evidence:Evidence:• narrow peak in velocity distribution• peak’s amplitude when T• cloud shape same as that of the potential well
Over 30 laboratories produce BEC87Rb, 23Na, 7Li, ↑H , He*, ...
Experiments with BECExperiments with BEC•Matter-wave optics: condensate interference, atom laser•Nonlinear atom optics•Superfluidity, vortices•Ultra-low density condensed-matter: Mott insulatorCold fermions
NowNow
Matter-wave OpticsMatter-wave Optics – Atom Optics– Atom Optics coherent waves interference
MIT
”atom laser”
MPQ
NIST
a) b)
c)
Nonlinear atom-opticsNonlinear atom-optics kin = kout
in = out
a) light waves
(material medium nonlinearity)
b) matter waves (always nonlinear)
BECBEC
1999 NIST (W. Phillips)1999 NIST (W. Phillips)
& Marek Trippenbach (UW)& Marek Trippenbach (UW)
Superfluidity, VorticesSuperfluidity, Vortices
MIT
LENS, Florence
Ultra-low density Ultra-low density condensed-mattercondensed-matter
Mott transition
MPQ – Garching
6000 87Rb atoms loading time 8 scooling time 2,1 scurrent 2A
Micro-BEC Micro-BEC
Garching
Micro-BEC 2 Micro-BEC 2
Tubingen87RbNumber of atoms in BEC: 106
Condensation at T=1KCooling time 27s
Cold fermions Cold fermions Do not thermalize (Pauli exclusion)Sympathetic coolinge.g. fermion 40K & boson 87Rb, fermion 6Li & boson 7Li
2001 R. Hulet (Rice)
Li7 Li6
1999 D. Jin (JILA) 40K
Our way towards BEC Our way towards BEC
MOT
MT
Magneto-optical trappingMagneto-optical trapping T 30 K, N 108
Transfer to mTransfer to magnetic trapagnetic trap by radiation pressure, by radiation pressure, recapture in a MOTrecapture in a MOT separated vacuum regions
differential pumping (10-8 mbar 10-11
mbar)
Magnetic trapping:Magnetic trapping: forced evaporation of hottest atoms,
thermalization by collisions T 100 nK, N 105 - 106
Element 87Rb
Transfer of atoms Transfer of atoms • repetitive pushing by resonant light beam, recapture
in lower MOTcollection speed: 108–1010 s-1
loading of lower MOT: 107–109 s-1
• constant pushing by narrow light beam (Dalibard) flux: ~108 s-1
• magnetic transfer directly into magnetic trap (Hänsch)30% efficiency, complicated.
Magnetic traps Magnetic traps
QUIC = Quadrupole + Joffe configuration: B ≠ 0 at trap center
Dalibard Hänsch
September 2002September 2002
• Laser system prepared• Upper MOT ready & operating• Next steps: transfer & recapture
magnetic trapping