42A15NE0017 2.15744 MORTIMER 010

. 1574 4

NORANDA EXPLORATION Co. Ltd. Geophysical Assessment Report

Pyne N Property claim 11201259 ( 3 units ) claim 11201260 ( 3 units ) Mortimer Township, Ontario

N.T.S. 42 - A - NE Larder Lake Mining Division

October, 1994. R.J. Daigle

Summary

Noranda Exploration Co. Ltd. investigates a train of aero

EM anomalies with 8.5 km of ground geophysics on the Pyne E

property. The ground HLEM survey noticing an anomaly of

concern, encourages more ground geophysics.

42A15NE0017 2.15744 MORTIMER

Table of Contents

01OC

Introduction Location/ Access Property Work History GeologyGeophysical agenda Magnetic Evaluation HLEH Evaluation Implications

page page page page page page page page page

l12555666

Addendum to report on Geophysical Surveys and equipment used.

List of Figures

Figure l.Figure 2.Figure 3.Figure 4,

Property Location Property Grid lay out Airborne Survey

l : 600,000 page ll inch = 1 /2 mile page 2

l : 20,000 page 3l : 20,000 page 4

Pocket

Plan l Plan 2 Plan 3 Plan 4 Plan 5

440Hz, Max-Min (HLEN) Profile Plan,1760Hz, Max-Min (HLEM) Profile Plan.3520Hz, Max-Min (HLEM) Profile Plan,

Magnetic Contour and labeled samples.Picket Line/ Compilation Map

l l l l l

5000,5000,5000,5000,5000,

Intreduction Page l

Noranda Exploration Co. Ltd, Timmins ON, investigates the Pyne N property with 8.5 km of ground geophysics. The company pursues a train of aero EM anomalies on claims 11201259 and 11201260, Mortimer Township. The property is 17 km north, along the NW industrial road out of Iroquois Falls Ontario.

M.C. Exploration Services Inc., Porcupine, ON., conducting line cutting, Mag, HLEM, completes the project in Feb., 1994.

Fifure 1

Location And Access

The two claim property is in Mortimer Township, found 17 km north of Iroquois Falls, Ontario. Next to the 17 km marker along the NW industrial road, the claims cover part of Doucette Lake.

The baseline start point for the grid is at post f 2, claim 11201259 (east side of road).

Property Page 2

Mortimer\ -- r- v*SM L '-"

- 1 200^21

?^?fe± itll!L- * t/-- -^

Figure 2

Claim 11201260 ( 3 x 16 hectares), covers SE1/4 of lot 10 in Sl/2 CON III and the Sl/2 lot 9 in Sl/2 CON III.

Claim 11201259 (3 x 16 hectares), covers Nl/2 of lot 9 in Nl/2 of Con II and the NW1/4 of lot 8 in the Nl/2 CON II.

The property is in Mortimer Township, Larder Lake Mining -Division.

Grid Page 3

1994 Selected Grid "Pyne N"

//A//.- .. , A - f *

Q 800M

Figure 3

The baseline extends from 00 to 1400W, having an

azimuth of N300Deg.T.

1400 meters of baseline7125 meters of xlines8525 meters, total lines cut

Baseline start point, post 12, claim 11201259.

Figure 4Plan of Claim Group and Input Response with Magnetic intensity from map ftgSO dated 1989 flown by Geoterrex Ltd., and

AnomtfylMMr

initiated by Ontario Geological Survey.

LEGEND

GEOTEM* Peak Response SymbolsANOMALY DECAY INTERVAL CLASSIFICATION

1-2 Channel (350.450 microseconds)

2-4 Channel (550.970 microseconds)

9-9 Channel (790.910 microseconds)

7-9 Channel (1050.1190 microseconds)

9-10 Channel (1350.1510 microseconds)

11-12 Channel (1990.1970 microseconds)

Magnetic Contours-———————— 10 Gamma Contour Line

/-4-•f Culture Response

50 Gamma Contour Line 250 Gamma Contour Line

Note: Responses dearly identifiable as overburden are not represented on this map

Mean magnetometer sensor attitude .......... 120 metres

Work History Page 5

No past work found on the property in the Resident Geologist's office. Larder Lake Mining Division.

Geology

No rock outcrop seen during the survey, with heavy snow cover.

GEOPHYSICAL AGENDA

From a baseline 1400 meters in length, running NSOODegT, shows lines at 90 degrees true north-south every 100 meters. A total of 8.525 km combining base line and cross lines exists ( Figure 3 ), with 25 meter station intervals. The contractor then applies Total Field Precession Magnetic ( TFM ) and Horizontal Loop Electromagnetic ( HLEM ) prospecting methods on the grid.

Magnetic readings taken every 12.5 meters on all lines tally 696 samples. The magnetic survey on Plan 4 (pocket) shows labeled samples with interpretive contours. The EDA PPM 350 Proton precession magnetometer and the EDA PPM 400 base station used, have a + J- 0 .02 nT sensitivity.

With the base station Mag on Stimson Grid D, the 8.525 km of TFM survey is smoothed using a reference field of 59464nT's. The PPM 400 monitors the magnetic drift every 30 seconds to then perform diurnal corrections on collected data.

The HLEM survey tallying 194 stations shown by profile interpretation on Plan's l, 2, 3 (pocket). Plan maps label both in-phase S out-phase elements and profile at a scale of lcm = 20% Operators read only cross lines at 25 meter intervals using the max-min 19 instrument. The survey uses a 200 meter coil separation with 440, 1760 and 3520 Hz frequencies selected by Noranda Exploration Co. Ltd.

Presenting 7.125 km of HLEM survey read on the grid.

Magnetic Evaluation Page 6

The weak diffuse contours reflect poor magnetic response from the deep underlying rocks. Postulating the underlying rocks to be of the sedimentary type, reference map 2205 (Timmins- Kirkland Lake). A NS diabase from 800W/ SOON to 300W/ 225S agrees with a high magnetic susceptibility plotted on aero mag map 81230. The propagation of this dyke disturbed by a fault bisecting the grid, runs grid EW or S of W. Another high mag feature arises along line 1400W, also coincides with another aero mag high. Therefore, speculating another NS dyke.

HLEM Evaluation

The HLEM ground survey is more implicate to geological noise than conductive materials. Another critical source of noise is the major powerline along the NW industrial road. The lower frequency, closest to 60Hz, disturbed more than the two higher frequencies, accountable to more grid coverage on the higher frequencies. Anomaly A, having complete coverage on line 1100W, interprets a depth of 30 meters and conductivity thickness of 5.4 mho's on 1760 Hz. The improving conductivity thickness on 440 Hz of 11 mho's, maintains concern. From compiling data on near surveys and the change of propagation of the dyke plotted on plan 4. Suspecting anomaly A conformable along a break up to line 700W, dispersed near the NS diabase. The magnetic survey does not refute this.

Implications

The gathered evidence encourages a shorter coil spacing on the HLEM survey. Line 1100W ensures good coverage.

An Induced Polarization Survey could certify the presence of metallic minerals, along this same line.

R. Daigle

SURVEY PROCEDURE

MAGNETICS

Theory:

The magnetic method is based on measuring alteration in the

shape and magnitude of the earth's naturally occurring magnetic

field caused by changes in the magnetization of the rocks in the

earth.

These changes in magnetization are due mainly to the

presence of the magnetic minerals, of which the most common is

magnetite, and to a lesser extent ilmenite, pyrrhotite, and some

less common minerals.

Magnetic anomalies in the earth's field are caused by

changes in two types of magnetization: induced and remanent

(permanent). Induced magnetization is caused by the magnetic

field being altered and enhanced by increases in the magnetic

susceptibility of the rocks, which is a function of the

concentration of the magnetic minerals.

Remanent magnetism is independent of the earth's magnetic

field, and is the permanent magnetization of the magnetic

particles (magnetite, etc.) in the rocks. This is created when

these particles orient themselves parallel to the ambient field

when cooling. This magnetization may not be in the same

direction as the present earth's field, due to changes in the

orientation of the rock or the field.

The most common method of measuring the total magnetic

field in ground exploration is with a proton precession

magnetometer. This device measures the effect of the magnetic

field on the magnetic dipole of hydrogen protons. This dipole

is caused by the "spin" of the proton, and in a magnetometer

these dipoles in a sample of hydrogen-rich fluid are oriented

parallel to a magnetic field applied by an electric coil

surrounding the sample. After this magnetic field is removed,

the dipoles begin to precess (wobble) around their orientation

under the influence of the ambient earth's magnetic field. The

frequency of this precession is proportional to the earth's

magnetic field intensity.

Field Method:

The magnetics data was collected with an EDA PPM 350 proton

procession magnetometer, which measures the absolute value of

the earth's magnetic field to an accuracy of + I- l gammas. The

magnetometer was carried down the survey line by a single

operator, with the sensor mounted on an aluminum pole to remove

it from any surface geologic noise. Readings were taken at

12.5m intervals.

The readings were corrected for changes in the earth's

total field (diurnal drift) with an EDA PPM 400 base station

magnetometer, which recorded readings every 30 seconds as the

survey was being conducted. The data from both magnetometers

was then dumped with a computer and base corrected values were

computed.

SURVEY PROCEDURE

MAX-MIN II

Theory:

The Max-Min II is a frequency domain, horizontal loop

electromagnetic (HLEM) system, based on measuring the response

of conductors to a transmitted, time varying electromagnetic

field.

The transmitted, or primary EM field is a sinusoidally

varying field at any of five different frequencies. This field

induces an electromotive force, (emf), or voltage, in any

conductor through which the field passes. This is defined by:

OE.dl^ O (the Faraday Induction Principle)t

where E is the electric field strength in volts/metre (and so

OE.dl is the emf around a closed loop) and O is the magnetic

flux through the conductor loop. This emf causes a "secondary"

current to flow in the conductor in turn generating a secondary

electromagnetic field.

This changing secondary field induces an emf in the

receiver coil (by the Farady law) at the same frequency, but

which differs from the primary field in magnitude and phase.

The difference in phase (the phase angle) is a function of the

conductance of the conductor (s), both the target and the

overburden and host rock.

The magnitude of the secondary is also dependant on the

conductance, and also on the dimensions, depth, and geometry of

the target, as well as on the interference from overburden and

the host rock.

These two parameters (phase angle and magnitude) are

measured by measuring the strength of the secondary field in two

components: the real field or that part "in-phase" with the

primary field; and the imaginary field, or that part in

"quadrature" or 90 degrees out of phase from the primary field.

The magnitude and phase angle of the response is also a

function of the frequency of the primary field. A higher

frequency field generates a stronger response to weaker

conductors, but a lower frequency tends to pass through weak

conductors and penetrate to a greater depth. The lower

frequency also tends to energise the full thickness of a

conductor, and gives a better measure of its true conductivity-

thickness product (conductance).

For these reasons two or more frequencies are usually used;

the lower for penetration and accurate measure of good

conductors, and the higher frequency for strong response -to weak

conductors.

Distinction between conductive targets, overburden, and

host rock responses are made by studying the shape of the

secondary field, and the difference in the frequency responses.

The transmitted primary field also creates an emf in the

receiver coil, which is much stronger that the secondary, and

which must be corrected for by the receiver. This is done by

electronically creating an emf in the receiver, whose magnitude

is determined by the distance from receiver to transmitter as

set on the receiver, and whose phase is derived from the

receiver via an interconnecting wire.

Field Method:

The Ma x-Mi n II survey was carried out in the "maximum

coupled" mode (horizontal co-planar). The transmitter and

receiver are carried in-line down the survey line separated by a

constant distance (in this case 200m) with the receiver leading.

Three transmitter frequencies were used: 440 Hz, 1760 Hz, and

3520 Hz and readings were taken every 25m. The transmitter and

receiver are connected by a cable, for phase reference and

operator communication.

lll 1 i

The PPM-350 is the latest addition to EDA's OMNIMAC*™ series of magnetometers and gradiometers. It is engineered to provide users with the latest state-of-the-art advances in microprocessor technology, including many features that are unique in the field.

Major benefits and features Include:* Significant increase in productivity* Lowered survey costs* Automatic diurnal correction* Programmable grid coordinates* Highly reproduceable data* Ergonomic design* Simplified fieldwork* Computer-compatible

PORlt\!

LEI-sEM

The MaxMin I ground EM Systems are designed for mineral and water explora tion and for geoengineering applications. They expand the highly popular MaxMin II and III EM System concepts. The frequency range is extended to seven octaves from four. The ranges and numbers off coil separations are increased and new operating modes are edded. The receiver can also be used independently for measurements with powerline sources. The advanced spheric and powerline noise rejection is further improved, resulting in faster and more accurate surveys, par ticularly at larger coil separations. Several receivers may be operated along a single reference cable.

Mating plug in data acquisition computer is available for use with Maxmin l for automatic digital data acquisition and processing. The computer specifications are in a separate data sheet.

I* Richard Daigle of Timmins, Ontario

Certify

1. Three years of HLEM (max-min) evaluation under the supervision of Mr. J. Betz ( 1979 - 1981 ).

2. Five years conducting, evaluating Geophysical surveys for Kidd Creek Mines Ltd under supervision of Mr. D. Londry (1981 - 1985 ).

3 Six years contracting various geophysical surveys in Bathurst, N.B. ( 1986 - 1991 ).

4. Third year as geophysical evaluator for M. C. Exploration Services Inc., Timmins Ontario.

6. I have no direct interest in the property reported upon,

Dated

Timmins,Ontario. M// R. J. Daigle

I, Warren Oilman of Timmins, Ontario

Certify

1. I am a Graduate of the University of Toronto with a B.Se and M.Se degrees in Geological Science.

2. I have been practicing my profession in North and South America and Africa for 50 years.

3. I have no direct interest in the property reported upon.

DatedTimmins, Ontario

Mr. Karren Gilman

Mnttyof

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mnlng Ad

l to fra PnMncW Sudbury. OK.no. P3E 6A6. fcHphoro (70S) 670-7264.

MMnQ LaVios* MbiMiy of NoiuMfn uMWOpiMfat Mtd MaDM* Fourtn Hoofv 190 C0daV SlrMt,

lnaliucUona; - Please type or print and submit in dupBcate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulation* for requir

2.1574 4

- A separate copy of this form must be completed f- Technical reports and maps must accompany this- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assignee

42A15NE0017 2.15744 MORTIMER 900

fo fee* Kor. 40 SLV\M Sk So*(K t M M foryaMorOPhm

Work Perfonned (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup

Geotachnfcal Survey•** — -^a — — a a** —— *-rnyBW IVUIK. InchMfno DrMng•%-a —— a^*^.-^ ——nonaDMmon

Other Aumortzadlilnafcnun

AssaysA^t^kltf^M^AHk^k*^ fctfMMABBijron6ni H wu i

Type

LC , itUa. * WU *tk WU H Ittrveifl

RECEIVEDPFC 1 3 1994

MINING LANDS BRANCH

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs

Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit aB or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name

POM tco

(attach a

Certification of Beneficial No. 1 on reverse

l cwtty that at fra tbm fra report war* recorded hi fm ourrar

id. tra cWiw cowrod in tMi workm hohtor's miw or Md undw a

by fra currant i vdadhoUvr.

Certfflcatlon of nepott\a^9*\*M*ptna*lHUi1^*to1tt*1utoln9*YMi to compMIon md anmnd report to tru*.

it. having parfonnad the work or swiw during and/or

i^or. Go

For Office Use Only

OM1(09M1)

Details for Hart Reoort t NEOKT34.GS7?aoe

Work Reoort! IClaii Nuiber for ADO lv ing !!see note 2'.

Reserve 1i

!L 1.201.253l

!l 1.2GU651

i11l

ii i ii ii

i i ii ii

ii i

!l

l

i

iii

tli

ii

1i

—————— j ——————————— i ————

!1 i

l

i

!

i ii i

t i ii i

iii i

i i

i 2Total Kuiber

of Clans

It of ! iValjC of Assesient! Value Aoolied ! iClaiii i Vork tone ! to this Clan ! '.Units! ! en this Clan ! !ill i i

1*1! 4 CC* AA 1 4 Cft* A* *

i J 1 : 1.B9V.UC t I.OQL'.UV 1 (li 1 1

! 3 ! i ',. 589.6S ' 1 .5C3.CO !\ — — ! \ ————————— i ————————— sIII 1 1

lil ' i

| 1 1 i 1

J i 1 i i

lil i i

i — l i —————— l —————— i• li j iili i J

ill i 1 : : : ' i III 1 1

i i i i i

j l i j i

1 —— : i ————————— 1 ————————— 1ill l l

lit i i

i;; s ; i i i i i1 ! ! ! !ill l l

1 ! ! ! l { —— ! ' ————————— i ————————— !! ' !lit i i

lit i i

iii i i

1 ! ! ! 1

lil l 1

ill 1 1

• li 1 l

: ! ! ! !

j —— : s ————————— i ————————— ilil l l

l t i i i

iii l l

iii i i

iii i i

iii i i

i ! ! \ i iii i iiii i iiii i i

iii i i

iii 1 i

III 1 1

i —— j \ ————————— 1 ———————— jIII 1 1 ir: : l iii i i

1 ! ! 1 iii i i

i ! 1 1 1i ——— \ ' ———————————— \ ———————————— !

! ! i ! i • •i i i

iii i iJ ——— l ! —————————— i —————————— ii i ! i ! iii 1 i

1 i A j*A A A i * *fitt A A ' 1 ! i.iOJ.VU 1 J.lSi.UU 1 II 1 i

Total Value York Total Value Dons Vork Aoolied

l Va-ues AssiQped -Reserve: Vork to be ! froi this Clan ' Claned at ! l a ruture Datei tI T 1 i

! !i l

i l

i i

l ii : i ii i i ii ii '

1 11 1

1 1! : i i

i i ! 1 i l

1 i! : * ii i

! i 1

1 i 1t i

! ! ' ii i! 1! —————————— 1 —————————— ,i l

i i* i i ii ii i

; i i i

! ! l i

i 1

i i

i i : ! i i

i i

i i

i i

! —————————— ! ——————————1 1

1 1

i i

i i

i ii :——— i ———i —————— i ——————l !1 ————————— ! ——————————1 i ! 1- ————————— j ————————— j: : ;1 —————————— i —————————— !

i i i

! 0.00 ! 3.00 ! i i i

Total Assianed Total Reserve Froi

l Credits you are claiiing in this reoort uv be cut back. In order to rinnize the adverse affects of such deletions, lolease indicate froi flinch clans vou msh tc onorize the deletion of credits. Please Mr* izi one of the following:i ^

il.n Credits are to be cut back starting pith the clans listed last. torKing backwards.

i i—i\t.i j Credits are to be cut back eoualli over all clans contained in this reoort of uork.

' i—i13.1 l Credits are to be cut back as on on zed on the attatched aooendijt.

l—!r—i

4.1x1 Credits are to be cut back starting trith the clans that have reserve credits.

Jln the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one Mill be iroleienteti.

Vote i: E moles of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, ootion oaywnts. wioranc-ui of agreements, etc..

with resoect to the lining clans. Sote 2: If W* has been oerforied on oatented or leased land, olease coiolete the fo

l! certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in {signature {the patented or leased land at the tile the aork MS oerforied. j^^^^

iSate

OntarioMinister* du

duNordat des

Statement of Costs for Assessment Creditiitat des coQts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur les mines

Transaction NoJN* de transaction

Personal Information cosseted on this form is obtained under the authority of thesJMng Act This information wB to used to maintain a record and ongoing etstui of the mining daim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. MMngs Lands. MMstry of Northern Development and lines. 4th Floor. 158 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (70S) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contends dans la presents formute sort recueMs en vertu de la Lot sur lea mines at serviront a tenir a Jour un ragistre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute question sur la coSoce de ose

Devetoppement du Nord et des Mines. 150. me Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6AS. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoQts directs

Type

Wagea

Contraclor'eWU V^ejiiB)ijiliBwPt V

Feea Orate de•^•ntrapcwMUf etderexpert-

Supples Ueed

Location de

n*m m inaki cmuoacnpDon

LabourMain-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type LCWl*j UL6*4

Type

Type

Amount Montant

*4frCD

Total Direct Costa Total des couts directs

Totals Total global

*IWCD

31 Woi)

2. Indirect Costs/Couts bxflrectm ** Note: When claiming RerMMtation ww tdkect costs are not

Pour to rembouraemert des travaux de rehabilitation, toe coflts induectsne sort pas admlsslito* en tart que travam (fevaJuation.

Type

Transport

^---a ^ ̂ ^rOOO eVMLodtsfcM•j^W^MBVBJ

Hpurrttureet

gg*g"*"*|

Amount AftmraMe (*™ " i^Birt Bilfnli aHilB

Ynfl^ Wak.* tj m — — —

DescriptionType

Amount

Sub Total of Indirect Coats Total partial des coots Imflrects

not greater than JO* of Ok pi'excedert pas M H dee i

(ToM et Obvet end MomM* d'evstosde bidhvct cede) IToM dM ei

loots directs)to ducted! n

Totato Total global

Wf^O

Hole: The recorded holder vrii to required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. M verification to not made, the Mntoter may reject tor assessment work

— •J —- — —-* f̂ ek^ m mtmmmMnne^ ^^M*ftV mm^**u*itt^*tVi Of pwi Ol W10 aSS89SmOni WOfK SUDIIMHQ.

:Lettu egislre tonu de verifier to* cle present etat des coats dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a cat eflst. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee. to iranistra peut rejeter tout ou une partto des travaux (revaluation presertes.

FMng Meeounte Remises pour depot

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed etlOOto of the above Total Value of Assessment Credft.

1. Les travaux deposes dans les dam arts suivant tour achevemert sort

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 504* of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit See calculations below:

TOM vi M Gr Tote] Assessment

x 0.50

2. Les travaux deposes troto.quatreou cinq ans apres tour achevement sort iwnbourses s 50 * de to vatour totato du cnkft d*evahiation susmentionne. Voir les caJculs ci-dassous.

Vatour Mate du credK d*eveJualianx 0,50 -

Evaluation Male Kttt

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des coOts

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possMe and these costs wore incurred white conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

JLPOsjsswn In Company)

J'atteste par la presents :que toe montarrts imfiquss son! le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont Me* engagees pour effectuer tos travaux d'evaluation sur lee terrains inrjquss dans la formule de rapport de travaHcHoim.

. l am authorized Et qu'a titre de

to make this certification a fair* cette attestation.

: Dans cette fm mule. torsQeil dteigne des psrsofmeSi Is est uUHes au sens newtre.

OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

January 30, 1995

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

Geoscience Approvals Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Our File: 2.15744 Transaction /: W9480.00562

Telephone: Fax:

(705) 670-5853 (705) 670-5863

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Mr. Spooner:

Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS OH MINING CLAIMS 120125* i 1201260 IH MORTIMER TOWNSHIP

Assessment work credits have been approved as outlined on the report of work form. The credits have been approved under Section 14 (Geophysical) of the Mining Act Regulations.

The approval date is January 30, 1995.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steven Beneteau at (705) 670-5858.

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division

SBB/jl Enclosures:

cc: Resident GeologistKirkland Lake, Ontario

ssessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario

No 5 Stimson Twp.

-•w

t- ty •o. ^ .n.-'l

i*.SS's.'Htjv '

.v .'*f L2S

t*

'f

N̂X*"',

.'V' ~"" . . **

MMATIQN THAT]

VAR!Ol*ACQURACY M N

, THOS TAKS

^BUN PIV6U

i FOR i M^

n^ Of ,. F i 8HOWN HERfOlf

V-1* *JJ' ™

APPLICATION) PENDING UNDER "A* PUBLIC ^LAND8 ACT

(toting fo

1200263

I20Q2I8J. l L V* ~

l' ) L akeLO |/ LO

\l

1200^26 1200229 1200^38

No.1200219

. 4HT6

1200225

\,

1200220

"tll9^567 l ^fl

1200230

-?1^

-\^v 1200)231

I200E23 1200232

1 109J7BI

1091790 j

IO9I789 '

en io /X-•B73* 1200222to'

1200235

J*-

^3712,

10

\

0024p

8 7 , .6 5J

Edwards Twp. '

937

120023'TV

1200236M

4200^35

I2OQ234

1193714

\

COPY OF THIS MYLAR ARCHIVED JUN 18/93

x -vi' v

x .y J, f

•' ' St''•' \

t .f IK,-

DAiF.or:r,s(!i-™. ^ * '*. iOft 12 1994

THE TOWNSHIP - OF .

MORTIMER"DISTRICT OF

COCHRANELARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

SCALDI-INCH*40 CHAINS

LEGENDPATENTED LAND - ' .

, CROWN LAND SALE LEASESLOCATED LAND , LICENSE OF OCCUPATIONROADS *IMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYRAILWAYSPOWER LINE9MAR6H OR MUSKEGMINESGEODETIC STATION

\

. LD 255i to Abitibi Elfctnc Development* Co5 Feb 1932, coders Power Line *

*-~8**lt \OA 'KJouj^nViIJWS ""L 0.5958 to Abitibi Power Si Paper Co Ltd6 May. 1942, covers Noilway '6 Grovel Pit

400' Surface Rights heservat(0n

all Lakes and Rivers.

NOTICE OF FORESTRY ACTIVITYTHIS TOWNSHIP l AKCA FAW* flTHIN fMCIROQUOIS FALLS MANAl ANOMXYM-*T*^J-lf5T( THEMNR UNTFOWTER CONTACTKO ATi

-x , t

PH? 7

I* ^1

PLAN No.-:M.Ey irlXWft*

IMINISTRYPF NATURAL. l i Ahl) MAKING 8i ANCH.

y* V"

* r *

1' 1 NI (1111 / ^ 1',M4 MOKIIMI H 200

lot 3

D N

IS

D

SCAE 1 :5000rsi

LEGENDINTERPRETED HLEM CONDUCTOR•i Very Good (30mho's - Inf)

Hi Good (16mho's - 30mho's)

Moderate (11 mho's - 15mho's)

Poor (4mho's - 10mho's)

Very Poor (1 mho's - 3mho's) d ^ Interpreted depth in meters

HLEM Survey Settings Cable = 200m Freq. 1760Hz

INTERPRETED MAGNETICS

Narrow Magnetic Models

Wide Magnetic Models Interpreted Contact Interpreted Fault

D Located Claim/ or Line Post

o Power Line Pole/ or Tower

0 l #7 4

NORANDA EXPLORATION Co. LTD.Compilation Map

Pyne-N GridMortimer Twp. NTTS: 42A/ NE

Larder Lake Mining DivisionM. C. Exploration Services Inc. Feb 1994.

oCM (N

-xx

^ -^ -^ •^

/v•s ^ ^ -•^

-v x/ .^D

n

R l sin

L1201259

1 :5CXX)100 (rnelres) ^00 JQO

N

f 'O M I Lontour l ri le r val

Levd l, SOnl from S8000 to

Level / ; ^ OOnF from hGOOO to bOOOOnl':,

Level J; lOOOnf from SbOOO to hOOOOnT':,

bSOOOnl Babe Subtracted

Base Station Location; Stimson Grid D

BLO/ 18bOW, Reference Field; b9464nT'b

INSTkLIMLNI : OMNI IV PPM - 6 bO

: O MNI IV PPM - 400

NARROW MAGNETIC MODELS

WIDE MAGNETIC MODELS

INTERPRETED CONTACT

INTERPRETED FAULT

2.1574 4

NOHANDA EXPLORATION Co. LTD.Magnetic Survey

Pyne-N GridMortimer Twp. NTS: 42A/ NL

Larder Lake Mining DivisionL xploration Services Inc. heb 1994.

o co CN

i ^inio

Iz li 1^

Xy

K: •^

L1201259

a

^ #Vy Vy

#

SOLE 1 :5000

Isin 3100 100 300 300

fN

MAX-MIN HORIZONTAL LOOP LEGEND1 cm. = 20 %

FREQUENCY 3520 HzIN PHASE —— OUT PHASE *——x

+203COIL SEPARATION

200 m.

POSTING IN t PHASE OUT PHASE

2. 1574 4NORANDA EXPLORATION Co. LTD,

HLEM SurveyPyne-N Grid

Mortimer Twp. NTS: 42A/ NE Larder Lake Mining Division

M. C. Exploration Services Inc. Feb 1994.

l

N

a

SCftE 1 :5000

F* l sin 100

MAX-MIN HORIZONTAL LOOP LEGEND1 cm. = 20 %

FREQUENCY 1760 HzIN PHASE ——— OUT PHASE *——^

COIL SEPARATION 200 m.

-20*

POSTING IN t PHASE OUT PHASE

15?4 4NORANDA EXPLORATION Co. LTD.

HLEM SurveyPyne-N Grid

Mortimer Twp. NTS: 42A/ NE Larder Lake Mining Division

M. C. Exploration Services Inc. Fob 1994.

o in(M

ii

l wl Z

D

1 :5000F* l an VXL 100

\N

MAX-MIN HORIZONTAL LOOP LEGEND1 cm. = 20 %

FREQUENCY 440 HzIN PHASE —— OUT PHASE *——^

+203COIL SEPARATION!

200 m.

-20*

POSTING IN t PHASE OUT PHASE

r 1*574 4

NORANDA EXPLORATION Co. LTD.HLEM S urveyPyne-N Grid

Mortimer Twp. NTTS: 42A/ NE Larder Lake Mining Division

M. C. Exploration Services Inc. Fob 1994.